Big Cocks Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Blacks on Blondes (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
This sight has all exclusive updates. Most of the new stuff is in HD a lot of the older stuff has been re posted in HD. The main sight updates like clock work every week. The episodes are well done with zipped photos for easy down load. Search options are easy. Episodes are in order but, there is a search and model index. |
| Cons: |
The one main weakness is that some of the themed sights only update once every two months. Most of the individual sights such as Spring Thomas say they update but just run recycled episodes as new.
Very dishonest!!! |
| Bottom Line: |
Great sight over all if your looking for interracial
and can accept its shortcomings. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Blacks on Blondes (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Well known stars
- Good quality video
- downloadable scenes
- network |
| Cons: |
- expensive for the number of sites
- older scenes are not compressed in single scenes
- older scenes are of poor quality
- In the solo girl sites, the scenes are recycled and dead
- plain design |
| Bottom Line: |
It has some really good quality recent scenes and stars. And a good network for the interracial fans. Unfortunately the price will stop some people. The design of the website is rather plain and much to be desired. A major thing for me is that the girl sites(Spring Thomas, Candy Monroe,etc.) the scenes have been recycled (older scenes are redated to appear recent). They have been dead for a while now. This practice is never good for a website to continue to do. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Blacks on Blondes (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
* Good quality (but not super high-res) pictures in Zip files
* Full download speed for cable connection
* No problem using download manager
* Server seems well tuned, never ‘dropped’ a download
* Easy Navigation, old style but no problems with site set-up
* Almost all male stars have huge tools and are often matched with petite girls
* Very large network, you will probably need all 30 days to select and download
* Network includes 19 sites
* Video quality is ‘only’ good (camerawork is not so good, resolution is too low)
* Several very cute girls, Kitty, Kennedy Kressler, Alexia Skye, Amai Liu and others
* Good Lighting in most scenes |
| Cons: |
* Poor camerawork, face & ass style, hardly ever see action from proper distance
* Video resolution is too low, best quality is only 640x360
* Logo/watermark too big, very obstructive of view, badly placed and distracting
* Almost every video is about 70% nonsense, 30% action worth viewing
* Way too much emphasis on oral sex, leans toward being a BJ site
* Far too many unnecessary “fades” and shifting to different angles
* Camera movements are mostly way too fast, zooming is at warp speed
* Cameraman sometimes tries to be the star, talks too much
* Girl’s movements into new positions often edited out --- why?
* At $34.99 the membership price is too high considering the competition |
| Bottom Line: |
Seldom have I seen a site that focuses on the face as much as this site. This is supposed to be a porn site --- right? I can see girls faces at the grocery store, I don’t need to pay money and join a site for that.
I, like many here at Porn Users, like to see a girl’s entire body, NOT just her face and her ass. But this is the old porn paradigm that refuses to die. I notice that sites that finally figure it out and break away from this type of camerawork consistently get much better ratings, (from the users anyway).
In my opinion, this type of camerawork is the curse of modern porn, they are still doing it just like they did in the 1970’s. Wake up guys, move the camera back and keep the camera steady. I know YOU can see everything YOU want to, but WE can only see what comes through the camera lens. It’s not that there is never a time for a close-up --- but that time is NOT all the time. And it should not be nearly all the time either.
One silver lining with sites that practice the face & ass camerawork style, is that you at least get a full length glimpse of the girl’s body when they move into another position. But not at this site, they normally edit that part out.
The best thing about this site is it has a good number of petite girls staring with some of the most well endowed men in porn. Its a shame they don’t back the camera up so WE the viewers can see it. Oh well, I guess this old paradigm will never die in the American and Euro porn industries, so I’m off to the Russian sites again where most of them know how to run a camera, like Teen Mega World for example.
Porn camerawork is not rocket science but considering the small percentage of sites that get it right, you would think it was.
1) This site lost 20 points for poor camerawork and editing
2) And lost another 10 points due to a large logo, cameraman won’t shut-up, too much nonsense, too much oral, not enough action and the video resolution is too low
If these things were fixed, it would be an awesome site, as it stands now, its pretty much run of the mill. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
