Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+You get access to about 19 sites.
+A large percentage of the content is exclusif.
+You can downoad the videos in WMV and MP4.
+They offer each video in HD 1920x1080.
+Most of the videos have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution appeas to be about 1200 x 800 fo most pics.
+Each scene is tagged with some key words so it's possiible to search using those one or more of those keywords.
Cons:
-Each page on the site is loaded with third party advertising.
-The site isn't really updating all that often anymore.
-A large part of the content is leased material which is available on many other sites.
-They mention access to first anal date but if you try the site then you are sent back to teens analyzed because they used all the content on first anal date to fill this site.
-They have a general search system but I tried using different keywords or names of performers and the results were bad to awful.
Bottom Line:
*The reason why I joined this site is because my membership gave me access to a bunch of sites that I've had my eye on for a few years now and there was no way I could pass up the opportunity to try them. Of course what often happens is that anticipation is never really satisfied and this time was no different. The vast majority of the sites have either badly shot, badly lit or downright crappy porn. There is an abundant amount of leased material aas well. Some of the sites don't have all that much content and they haven't actually updated in years.
*Now it's not all bad because I did find a few videos that were worth keeping and maybe someone else who is maybe less picky can find stuff that they want but be forwarned that expectation may need to be lowered.
*It's hard to say who will be happy with the content on this site or the other ones because it's quite possible that you already have some of their scenes from similar sites out there. I think that if you aren't too picky and prefer a certain amateur feel to your porn then you might find some nice gems here.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-3,200+ videos for the network.
-The network is still updating.
-Free lifetime access for ex-members. After your membership expires, you can still see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in the member zone.
-You can save your favorite videos, models and photosets.
-Low annual membership price. I joined for $60/year.
-The network has at least 9 sites you get access to.
-Telephone live support is supposed to be 24/7. But I never used it, to try it out.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading (at least, I never found any limits. However, I don't download a lot, so, based on my personal history, I wouldn't usually encounter any download limits if there were any.).
-You can steam the videos in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-You can download the videos in 240p, 720p, 1080p, 4K.
-The network updates with 3 to 5 new videos and matching photosets per week.
Cons:
-Login and member pages are not secure (no https).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-There is a live sex cams channel. I'm not interested in live sex cams. And when I click on the channel, I get a notice, in Spanish, that:
A problem has been detected with your account.
You can contact live support if you have questions.
(Why the notice is in Spanish I have no idea, since the rest of the network is in English.)
-Your login details are computer generated, instead of allowing you to choose your own.
-There is only 1 definition for the zip file for the photosets. But the photoset is mainly a screencap collection of the video. And hardly worth collecting.
Even when the models are cute, the photoset is not worth collecting.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: A variation of kinky sex.
From the site description:
"They must be total perverts to sit there and watch their GFs get fucked for cash
For some of these guys watching their girlfriends get banged by another man is a real turn-on while for others it's a painful pleasure
Watch these hot amateur chicks get their brains fucked out by horny strangers right before their boyfriends' eyes"
If you get off from watching a guy sell his girlfriend for some needed cash, and enjoy the guy's humiliation, or it turns you on as a voyeur to watch a girl having sex in front of her boyfriend, this site will scratch that itch.
The vibe of the site: this is a home-movie collection of videos. They are not trying to make glamcore porn, but home-based porn, where you get the stunt cocks in cheap clothes, the models in cheap street clothes, a low-rent apartment where the sex takes place. The guy is selling his girlfriend for needed cash, and he watches some other guy having sex with his girlfriend.
Not only is this home-based porn, but it's Russian home-based, low-rent porn, where the attitude is, "She my girlfriend, I'm making money off her pussy." So, not a lot of romance or glamour to the attitudes or settings or costumes or makeup to make the girls look attractive.
The girls are young teens, mainly naturally attractive, but the sex is like a bologna sandwich where you grab two slices of bread, maybe swipe a bit of mayonnaise with a kife, slap in one or two slices of bologna, and start chomping away.
This isn't even bread-and-butter porn.
It's more like two slices of bread, slapped together, and eaten.
No pickles, no mayonnaise, no mustard, no lettuce, maybe a slice of bologna, nothing else.
So if you're tired of the normal glamcore porn, and want to go back to the good-old-days of low-rent porn, this site and network can fill that need.
The only problem is that a lot of the teens are cute girls.
And they deserve better treatment, to make their videos and photosets more enjoyable.
If you want simple teen porn, with attractive teen models that are attractive yet presented simply without a lot of glamour, I recommend the Teen Mega World network, which has thousands of attractive teens, that are fucked in a variety of ways.
In spite of the low membership price of this site and network, I would recommend looking for other sites to join.
Note: I'm not a fan of the home-based porn style of shooting.
I've seen videos from this network at tube sites (like PornHub and others), where those videos were attractive. That's why I joined this network, because the videos I saw from this network were attractive. The same videos, at the network, are far less attractive. I assume that either the tube sites, or the network, upgraded the sample videos.
I just wish the network did the same upgrades on the videos at the network.
Then, I would recommend the site and network as worth joining.
Normally, you think that the quality of a video at the original network is higher quality than the version at a tube site.
Site stats:
Site videos: 269
Site updates with one new video and photoset per month.
The network updates with 3 to 5 videos and photosets per week.
Network stats:
Network videos: 3,236
Network photos: 212,691
Network models: 2,254
Photosets: Average 50 photos per set, for the site and the network.
The network started offering 4K videos in late 2016 for their newest videos.
In February 2017, the network gave free access to expired members.
From now on all expired members get free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. Even with network access and a low membership price, I would not recommend joining.
Which is a shame. Because the network has a lot of cute teen models.
However, maybe I'm being too hard.
In all of the videos I watched at the site, the boyfriend stayed to watch the guy fucking the girl.
Maybe he was checking to see if the buyer was getting his money's worth.
Maybe the guy doing the selling wanted to make sure his girlfriend was enjoying the sex.
Maybe the guy selling, and the guy buying, were true friends and the money was just a device where they could share the girl without telling the girl the two guys were really interested in each other, and the girl was just a beard used to hide the fact the two guys are gay?
Questions like this could raise the score by a few points.
A listing of the sites included in network access is included in the first reply to this review.
As well as a few notes on the listing.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You can sometimes find a low-priced membership of around $60 for 1 year.
-A lot of cute models at the site and network.
-Videos offered in your choice of definition:
Download from mobile up to 4K.
Streaming offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-Video runtime around 25-30 minutes, so easy to watch.
-Sex is basic, with oral, vaginal, anal.
-You get access to around 15+ sites in the network.
-Network has 3246 videos, 2256 models.
-Site has 182 videos.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update was May 29, 2020. Before that, the update rate was 1 or 2 videos per month.
-Login and member pages are not secure, so prone to hacking. A few days ago, I got a message my account was blocked, due to password sharing. I've never shared my password with anyone. I don't know if the account was hacked, or it's just a glitch with the site server.
-Navigation is poor. Multiple reasons for this:
-The search engine is messed up.
-1. It only returns a minimal number of hits if you enter a phrase such as "redhead model".
I got 3 hits. Surely, there are more than 3 redheaded models at the site and network.
2. The search engine freezes your search term. After entering the phrase "redhead model", I tried entering a different phrase to search for. The seach engine returned the previous search, "redhead model", and wouldn't search for a new phrase. Even when I logged out of the site and re-logged in, and tried use the search for a different phrase, the site still showed me
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
"redhead model" as my search term.
I don't know what to call it, except messed up. And worthless.
3. They have a model listing, but it's only for the network, not for the site.
And they mix in the stunt cocks in the model listing. So you have to manually page through thousands of mdoels in the model listing to find the models you might like. Which takes a lot of time. The model thumbnails are small and not flattering to the models, and the thumbnails for the individual videos are small and not flattering to the models, which decreases your interest in the videos.
It's just a poor presentation of the site and network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Network advertises "most beautiful amateur girls ultimate hardcore action".
But that is standard porn hype. Many of these girls are Eastern European models you've seen at many different porn sites. And I wouldn't call the action the ultimate hardcore. If you want over-the-top hardcore, visit Rocco Siffredi, or the Porn Fidelity sites.
-The photosets download in only 1 file definition. But the quality is just OK to poor. The photos are more like screen caps. What is surprising is the size of the downloaded photoset. Around 245 MB for a photoset of 102 photos. MetArt's high grade high definition photos are in that size range, and First Anal Date's photos are more like screen caps than real photos, so I don't know why the First Anal Date photos are so large.
The First Anal Date photosets are not worth collecting, even when the model is cute, because the quality of the photos is poor.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
In spite of a number of attractive models, the site does not impress me much.
The videos seem like home-shot videos, even though they are probably professionally shot.
The sets are just OK, not as nice as what you find at many competing teen hardcore sites.
Stats:
Videos: 182 videos.
Video runtime: 20-30 minutes.
Photosets: around 100 pics per set.
Photoset size: around 245 MB.
Photo quality: poor.
I would rather spend a few more dollars and get a membership in a porn site/network that will give me better quality content. It's not the attractiveness of the models, but the overall impression of watching home-made sex videos that is poor.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Chicks are sweet and nearly innocent looking amateurs
+ Photos are crisp and movie action is always a tasteful turn-on
+ Hi-Res pics
+ Professional looking design
+ Exclusive teen-amateur content
+ Updates are made on a daily basis
+ Simple navigation
+ Loaded with a lot of masturbation and self pleasuring
+ Lots of original movies available for instant download
+ No DRM protection
+ No download limit
+ ZIP file is provided for pictures
Cons:
- Not many hardcore action
- No bonus sites
Bottom Line:
18 Pussy Club is all about the sexiest teens showing off their hot bodies and their sexual skills in exclusive videos and photo sets. This site is fresh, clean-looking and combines explicit softcore and hardcore. I've found simple navigation. Under the header which is located at the top I have the following links: Girls, Movies, Features, Feedback, Reviews, Members, Join now. I was impressed by the 18 Pussy Club photo sets which can be downloaded in ZIP files. These are high quality, professional shots and are over 1200 pixels on the long side. The thumbnails are nice and sharp and some girls have a nice round asses which will make you happy for good. Even when the chicks are being nailed by a dick, there's a softness to the images that make the scenes seem more dreamy than explicitly nasty and tasteless. The videos usually display at 640x480, 1500Kbps in WMV format. It is mostly solo stuff, but this in itself has lots of variety. Bonus content in the form of third party feeds is available to members and there are plenty of features like a members’ forum and rating system to keep things interesting. If you enjoy soft core material presented from young girls that will dip their finger inside their womanly well for you, then you’ll like what 18 Pussy Club has to offer.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Young couples, Girls are young and hot
+ Access to Other Websites
+ Good amateur content
+ Good downloading speed
Cons:
- Needs to up date more on movie archives
- Can be a little confusing when searching for a particular couple
Bottom Line:
This website features hardcore amateur couple sex movies/pictures and softcore solo girl pics. Choices seem endless, however there are more picture selections than movie archives. Individuals who endure amateur porn, this is a website you will like.
There was a small disappointment I found when I joined. I basically joined this this website because of a sample movie advertised on its front page, the scene with Kattie and Jim. I selected that archive sample and it brought me to the access page, so I figured if I joined the website, I would get to see that particular scene with Kattie and Jim. After I joined, I never found Kattie and Jim the whole 3 months I was a member.
Besides the nice amount and quality of the movie selections, the site does need a little work on making it easier for the user to locate desired content and actual selected archives. Downloading speed is good. Updates for not as frequent as they should occur.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good download speeds. I get 1 to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Down Them All download manager works at this site.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Site uses Epoch.com as the billing agent, a nationally recognized bill agent.
-The content is dated when posted to the site.
Cons:
-Site needs a complete makeover to make it easier to use.
-Search function is poor. You enter the name of a model, and it turns out that the model is not even in the videos or photosets that are returned from the search. So either different models are given the same name, or the search function is crap. Either way, if you want to search for videos that a model appears in, it seems like you will have to manually search through all the videos at this site, which is a complete waste of time.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like.
-Lots of advertising for other sites on members pages.
-There is an amateur feel to the videos. They seem to shot by an amateur videographer who has an amateur camera: the focus could be better, the shots could be better framed, the lighting is ok but not professional, the colors are not super-crisp, the sets/background is cheap furniture inside a house or apartment.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Videos download with a poor default filename such as "high.MP4, so you have to rename them to tell them apart.
-The site structure is poor. To go through the videos, you have to click on a number to go to a page that lists 5 videos, then click on the higher number go to the next page. But you get duplicates of videos that were found on earlier pages. A video that appears on page 3 might also appear on page 4. So it's not easy to navigate the site, and the duplicate listings make it harder.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like. Trying to identify who the models are in the videos is a waste of time. Unless you recognize a model in a video from some other site, you don't know who the models are in a video, because the names the site lists (for who appears in a video) are useless.
-Videos have subtitles to translate the Russian the models speak. But the video download files do not have the subtitles. Not a big deal, because the subtitles are mainly boring. The sex action is what counts.
BOTTOM LINE:
Sorry for the poor language, but these site/network really needs a makeover to make the site contents easier to use.
When you compare Teen Mega World or Diesel Access networks or X-Art or other high grade sites to this site, you begin to realize how much thought was put into making the other sites/networks easier to use. At Young Sex Parties, there is little to no thought to making the site user-friendly. They opened a site, dumped cheap amateur-style, home made videos into the site, and let the members sort through the mess without any helpful model list, without any effort to name the models on a consistent basis, without bothering to add a listing of the models in the videos.
Choice of file types for download:
FLV For Windows,
MP4 For Windows, Mac, iPad, iPhone4
MP4 For iPhone3/iPod
MP4 For Sony PSP
3GP For mobile phones
Number of site videos:
The Best Porn (the parent of the PU site) lists the number of site videos at 117.
I believe The Best Porn site reviewer just took the number of videos from the site facts, instead of counting the videos themselves.
You have a sort-of-listing of the videos pages, 24 pages in all, with most pages showing 5 videos. The last page has 3 videos. But like I mentioned, there are duplicate listing of at least several videos on those pages.
So the 117 video count at this site means you have 117 videos if you include the duplicate videos.
If you want to follow that system, then if a site has 10 video, and they list those 10 videos twice, then the site can claim 20 videos. Or even 100 videos, if they are sloppy enough to list their videos duplicate times in a list.
The models are real teens. Both the girls and the boys. The girls are OK, not really cute or super-attractive. On average, the models are less attractive than the teens you will see at random at a hometown mall. Maybe that's partly because the models appear to wear very little make-up to make themselves more attractive. The models' clothes are what they could buy at a thrift shop or the Salvation Army store.
The bottom line is, after watching a number of these videos, I start to find them mostly boring and a waste of time to watch. I much prefer the glamcore videos at X-Art or Diesel Access network, where an effort is made to present the models attractively. Or even Teen Mega World videos, where less effort is made to make the models attractive, but the physical attractiveness of the models is higer than the models at Young Sex Parties, and the overall quality of the videos is better than the Young Sex Parties videos.
In my opinion, the amateurish feel of the videos just means cheap production values, unattractive selection of models, cheap clothes and cheap settings.
I hope that I will find better videos at the other bonus sites in this network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 38 videos and around 34 image sets (updates seem to happen more frequently recently.The last few updates are as follows: 15 Oct 2011, 7 oct, 15 sept, 9 sept, 07 aug and april before that )
- Around 25 minutes for each video WMV available as 1920x1080 and around 480x270
- Images are available as zipped archives and look good (anywhere from 50 to 200 per scene)
- On average very good looking models and we get oral, vaginal sex and anal in a few different positions (almost all scenes have doggy and reverse cow) The finish is mostly on the girls back although we have a few facials and anal creampies.
- Navigation works pretty well and if you hover the mouse over the preview scenes you get to see a few images from the scene (It makes getting an idea of the video you're about to see much easier)
- You get access to (I believe all) Pink Visual streaming sites as well as I shoot my girl, they caught on camera and a few more and if you stay with the site longer they give you more sites.
Cons:
- All the models have different names from other sites making it hard to tell what model you're looking at (I believe they have a few new girls here, but I can't be 100% sure) The lack of a models index makes this even harder. I'd like too see more focus on the models, but maybe that's just me
- The scenes tend to have very poor lighting and some of the older ones look closer to amateur porn than something professional.
- More search options will become necessary as the site grows.
- Pretty huge ads for other sites
- A lot of the action is pretty generic Russian porn. There are a few scenes that look really good with the actors getting really into it, but a lot of the girls look bored/ mentally checked out.
- All videos save as fulllength-high.wmv, which seems to be a plague of Russian sites. Makes organizing your downloads harder.
- I hate that the PinkVisual sites don't allow downloads (I know they are just offering those sites as a bonus, but I love complaining about them :)
Bottom Line:
I joined this site because I am a "completist" and wanted all scenes with Aspen (who is named Olga or something like that on this site). However, I was surprised at the quality of some scenes here as well as the nice bonuses they offer.
The videos, especially the large option look great(honestly don't even bother with the low resolution stuff since the poor light and the 420x resolution will make for a horribly looking movie). They have a lot of good looking models and while the action is not the most diverse, there are a few really good moments here.
Some highlights of the models they have are Aspen, Agnessa and Henessy as well as a bunch of other girls I didn't recognize (Vanessa and Lucie are were very adorable).
The scenes range a lot in quality with some girls who look like they are drunk or half asleep to some girls that push themselves into the guys cock. I remember one particular scene where the girl is eager to get him in her anus and grabs a bottle of lube herself. It was incredibly hot seeing her lube the dude and force him into her ass.
What is also pretty darn cool is that they have a bunch of videos where the girl seems really hesitant to go for the anal sex. For a site that calls itself FIRSTanal date that makes a lot of sense and a level of "realism" that ads a lot to the feel of the site. (Sadly for the most part the girls don't even seem to notice a difference between vaginal and anal sex)
Overall, I'd say they come pretty close in type of content to sites like Teenmegavideos or maybe Firstanalquest (Firstanalquest has a lot more stockings and cute outfits, something this site avoids entirely).
The big difference, of course, is that firstanaldate only has around 40 scenes so far. Just comparing the number of videos you'd get those other two sites are better deals or even better go to 21sextury or Teencoreclub and get a hell of a lot more content with better light and more variation in outfits/ action.
Now don't get me wrong if the site continues to grow at the pace they showed for the past few weeks this will become a hell of a deal. (And if you're like me and need all videos of a certain model this is is also a great deal :)
What is nice though is that the site seems to know that it's not offering enough content so they give out a ton of nice bonuses. The Pink Visual network is pretty great (except for their streaming only policy) and if you hang around for 100 days or so you get around 20 bonus sites (of course a bunch are old and don't update anymore but Bang my teen ass, Nasty angels,18 pussy club, I shoot my girl are all nice sites with similar content. Sadly young libertines and casual teen sex don't seem to be available as part of this "stick around get bonus sites" deal)
Considering the bonuses offered, the limitations of almost all Russian porn sites (why the hell does everyone have to re-name models? ) and the bonuses this site offers the whole package is not bad, not great, but not as bad as many other sites out there. I still stand by my opinion that 21 sextury or Teencoreclub are miles ahead of this place, but if you're bored with those more mainstream places and love anal scenes this place is not bad.
Bottom-line: average, worth checking out if you're a huge fan and looking for new sites to join.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Small site. 25 videos. Why is that a positive? Because the videos are crap, you can see this right off from the first video to the last video. So it doesn't take a long time to realize the site is crap.
-The models at the site are Markus and Nicky. They are in all the videos. Two below-average people in looks (Markus is a plain guy, Nicky is an unappealing girl). How is that positive? Because you quickly realize that you will either find the videos appealing or not, because this is home-style porn that you either like or dislike. Not a lot of variety in the style.
-One thing that is positive is the text description of the videos: it's short, direct, and covers the plot of the video:
Examples:
"When me and Nicky got to the bath together and I touched her wet body my cock became so hard that I couldn't stand any second and not to put it in her. I even shot it on camera to remind that horny moment sometimes."
Cons:
-Joining the site directly is expensive: $29.95/month.
There are often sales that offer $14.95/month if you join the network directly, or $60/year.
Except there are better networks around that are more expensive, but offer better quality content.
-This is an archive site. The site has has 25 videos. That was the count in 2008, that is the count in 2020.
-Resetting your password is easy, if you get locked out. However, there is a captcha that is difficult to solve, and usually takes a few tries to get correct.
-Login and member pages are not secure. Your browser will probably have a popup that states the login and member pages are not secure and prone to hacking.
-Username and password are computer-generated. Can't choose your own.
Bottom Line:
The site advertises the content is 100% homemade. This is plus and minus: Plus, that you know it's probably true, because the videos are so cheaply made: cheap sets, jerky filming technique, poor lighting, a stunt cock and the girlfriend model that are, to put it kindly, below-average-in-looks.
That's the plus side.
The minus side: I look at two of the videos at the site, and that's more than enough for me.
Why would I waste my time on this crap?
Why?
Because I want to post a review to qualify for one of the raffle prizes.
That's the only reason I'm writing a review on this throw-away porn site.
The site advertising or site description is false.
Maybe I'm being harsh.
The site says the stunt cock is 23 years old, the model is 19.
That might have been true in 2008, when the site was launched, but it's now 2020, 12 years later, so the models must be slightly older today.
However, the site contents were probably shot in 2008, and have never been updated.
So, in that sense, the models were 23 and 19 when the videos were made.
The site states the model is sexy and gorgeous.
Maybe she's sexy. But gorgeous? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: To me, this is one fug ugly girl.
Porn and life is a learning experience.
I'm still learning that people can believe wildly separate things about the same object.
To call this model gorgeous is to claim that Donald Trump, our beloved president, is the kindest, most caring person in the world.
And Trump is also the most honest person in the world.
Earth shaking ideas that rattle my brain.
The videos have a posting date of 2013. That is probably a lie.
They were probably first posted around 2008, when the site was first launched. And then the posting date for the videos was changed to 2013, to make it appear that the site was updating, even though there were no updates. Some sites change the posting dates of their content to try to fool the casual viewer that the site is updating.
The site had 25 videos in 2008.
The site has 25 videos in 2020.
I can't swear the 2020 videos are the original 2008 videos, but I strongly suspect that they are the original videos.
I would give the site a score of 55.
That's being generous.
The site advertises homemade-style videos. That is true. The sets (I call them sets, but they used whatever was available: a cheap apartment, sex in a car at a park, and lots more videos at the cheap apartment in the living room, the bathroom, the bedroom.
On the positive side: with membership to this site you get access to the entire network of about 20 sites. Almost all the sites are going for the homestyle vibe. Many of the sites are throw-away sites that no longer update. There are a number of cute models, and maybe you can find some videos worth watching. But I would rather spend more money and find a network with better quality content that I can enjoy more.
The network is surprisingly large, with 3,258 videos, around 20 sites.
Mostly the sites go for a home-based amateur style of shooting: cheap sets, teen-based porn that requires little scripting, not a lot of care put into making the models or videos look good.
The vibe is home-based videos. Except a lot of the girls are cute, and the videos could be so much better if they changed their style to make the girls more attractive, to upgrade the videos with better lighting and equipment.
Actually, that is what the network has been doing with a few of the sites that still update: they are changing the video approach from home-style to more mainstream style: better lighting, better sets, that present the models more attractively. So if you joined the network, and have the time, there are videos that are worth watching.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Apparently one username and password will work to gain entry to all the bonus sites I am supposed to have access to.
-Get access to 21 bonus sites with membership.
-Download manager works. I use Down Them All, which is very helpful at this site.
-Homepage has a link to "YOUNG TIGHT PUSSY new for your ultimate pleasure", which opens an ad for fleshlight, which has differently named models of the fleshlight, also different color options, which is really more than I wanted to know.
Cons:
-You are assigned a random-generated username and password for site login.
-Primitive site design.
-Download speeds can vary from less thant 200 KB/sec to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-You have to be patient with their hot links. They often don't work on the first or second click.
-Download manager is really helpful. If a video file stops downloading, you can resume the download with the download manager. Several files stopped downoading in mid-download, and I was able to resume the download in each case.
-Video files download with the default filename of "download.zip". So you have to rename the files to keep them separate.
-Site contents have no posting date.
-No search function. If you want to find the videos with a model, have to manually search through the entire videos and hope her name is listed on the tiny thumbnail that represents the video listing.
-No streaming offered. If you want to examine a video, have to download the video, and then play it.
Bottom Line:
This is not a tiny site. There are over 300 videos at this site. The theme of the site is young teens doing nasty things with sex.
The poor site structure makes navigation difficult. No search function, no model listing with thumbnails to show what the models look like, no model bios. They opened this site, and dumped a bunch of videos into it. And that's a shame. Because many of the models are cute or attractive. Many of the videos are nicely shot.
Videos are grouped into two categories:
Softcore movies, and hardcore movies.
Their definition of softcore includes lesbian sex, blowjob, masturbation.
Their definition of hardcore includes boy-girl fucking. Blowjob can be found in both the softcore and hardcore movie categories.
The videos are better than I thought they would be.
Sample data rates:
The frame width x height is: 1024x576.
Total bitrate: 2548kbps
Frame width x height is: 632x512
Total bitrate: 1181 kbps
The videos are professionally shot: good color, good focus, good lighting, nicely framed shots.
They also have some very attractive models at this site.
It's a shame they have some nice videos of attractive models that they just dumped the videos into a site without making much effort to making the site easier to use. Because of the unsorted, jumbled videos, most people would not realize that some of the videos are really excellent.
I'm giving the site a score of 75 because some of these videos are worth viewing and saving. That's in spite of the site problems which I've detailed: no search function, no streaming, no model iist with thumbnails to show what the models look like, hot links that barely work to download the videos.
I certainly can't recommend the site. Except that if you stumbled across some of the videos that I thought were really nice, maybe you would think the site might be worth joining, after all.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Exclusive content. I believe the content is basically 100% exclusive. I've joined a lot of teen porn sites, and I've never seen any of the Young Sex Parties videos at other sites (except for tube sites, which seem to have a smattering of most teen porn sites in edited versions).
-Low membership price. You can get an annual membership for $60/year, with a PU discount. The listed price is $120/year.
Join through the PU link to 18 Videoz, which opens the offer to join at $60/year when you hit the join link. Or you can join for $15 for the first month, with a PU discount.
Joining the YoungSexParties.com directly, even using the PU link, shows a price of $120/year or $30/month, so don't join Young Sex Parties directly; instead, join through the PU 18 Videoz link, which gives you the lower prices.
-Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network of around 18 sites. There are no premium sites requiring an extra payment.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The network updates with 1 new video and photoset around 5 or 6 times a week. With covid slowing porn production, that's pretty good.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Videos offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p, 4K. That's both for streaming and downloads. The older videos don't have the 4K option.
CONS(START OF):
-Comparing the quality of the site/network to the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films), to the 18 Videoz network, this is defintely a step down.
The Wow network gives you a catalog of cute to lovely teen models that are filmed in high quality videos and high quality photosets. And the Wow models are cute to lovely, and would qualify to appear at any softcore glamor site such as Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, whatever.
The models at Young Sex Parties aren't up to the Wow network standards, but they are mainly attractive. You wouldn't kick any of these girls out of your bed, if you were lucky enough to snag one.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The sets at Young Sex Parties are less expensive than the Wow network sets. The lighting and filming and colors are not as vibrant and exciting as the Wow network standards.
Don't get me wrong: the Young Sex Parties videos are definitely watchable. It's just that they are step below what the Wow network offers.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site has 272 videos
Each video has an accompanying photoset.
Photosets average around 60 to 80 photos or screenshots.
Personally, I don't think the photosets are worth collecting, unless you're a real fan of some model, because the photos (and screenshots) are not high quality, and don't present the models that attractively, even when the model is naturally attractive.
The videos at Young Sex Parties fall under the "Reality Porn" category. The plots are basically very simple. They don't feature the stupid dialog and parody style of many porn sites. Instead, you get one or more teen girls, mainly attractive, one or more teen guys, passable looks, and they look at each other, touch each other, and start to fuck and suck. Not a lot of dialog. Not a lot of motivation, except the girls are horny, and the guys are horny, so that's the plot (internal horniness leads to sex).
I much prefer this simple plot to the stupid plots and stupid dialog featured at many hardcore teen sites.
(The Wow network gives better plots that aren't stupid. And you can sometimes catch a special discount to the Wow network for $60 or $70 per year, which a great price for an excellent teen network.)
The Nubiles Porn network also offers a ton of attractive teen models in high quality videos and photosets that are superior to what the 18 Videoz network/sites offer.
If you wait for a holiday discount, you can join the Wow network for around $63/year or $70/year (through one of their email offers, if you sign up for their weekly newsletter).
That gives you access to their 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films.
You can join Young Sex Parties through their 18 Videoz network for $60. Joining Young Sex Parties directly, which gives you the same access, costs $120/year.
I definitely think the Wow network is a better choice over 18 Videoz.
The Wow network content is better:
The models are more attractive, the videos are higher quality: crystal clear videos, excellent quality photosets that are worth collecting, better sets, better editing.
The price of membership to Wow network is close to the price of 18 Videoz network.
But if you have the extra money, I think the Young Sex Parties and 18 Videoz network is worth joining.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hi resolution videos--1920x1080
-Hi resolution Pictures--1500x1125
-Nice fresh looking girls.
-Option for lower resolution DL--480x270
-Videos are decent quality with nice action. Up close with good face shots as well. I am picky but kept all video sets. I don't collect pictures.
-Material appears to be original
-There are extras, streaming from Pink Visual
Cons:
-Only 18 video sets
-Only 12 picture sets
-No updates in last 3 weeks
-No dates on updates
-Extra sites not that great-poor video quality
Bottom Line:
I would only recommend joining this site if you like anal sites and you don't mind spending $29.95 for 18 videos. For me $1.66 per video is an ok deal. Definitely don't buy the 60 or 90 day option.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Occasional videos with real sexual excitement and orgasms.
- Beautiful young bodies (both men and women).
- Occasionally what might be real couples with real chemistry in homemade videos.
- No super closeups! Few closeups at all. You get to enjoy the beautiful writhing bodies!
- The stunt cocks are generally nice, gentle and non-abusive (if boring).
- I asked several questions via a support form, and got prompt and helpful answers.
- Photos can be viewed online, downloaded individually or in zipped sets.
Cons:
- Most videos are mechanical, there is no chemistry, so they are un-erotic. Perpetual optimist that I am, I was hoping for better at this site!
- Video quality varies widely. Some shot by a cameraperson (those are best). Some homemade with fixed camera. Some POV (usually too jerky). Some low-res, most OK resolution.
- Way too many videos end with the guy jerking off in girl’s face. I hate that.
- About five guys are the stunt cocks in many of the videos. None have any personality. They bang hard with no imagination. Its up the girl to make something good in these. Most fail.
- When you download a video, the default filename is a useless fulllength-high.wmv, or fulllength-low.wmv. Its up to you to rename every one.
- Several ads for other sites interspersed on every page! Annoying!
- Static images (1500 px) modest quality (inferior cameras?), poor lighting (flash), and red-eye not removed. Models’ teeth often yellow. Generally unexciting.
OUT OF ROOM, CONTINUED IN 1ST "REPLY".
Bottom Line:
Overall, I was disappointed with this site (as with nearly all), but it was not a total loss, as I was able to find 20-some videos that I really liked to add to my collection. However, as seems nearly universally the case, the truly erotic videos seem to be accidents that happened in spite of bad direction and lack of imagination.
WMV is the only video format offered. “High quality” is 640 x 480 but quality varies. There is also a “low bitrate” video download option, which I never used.
Video download speed was so so, taking about 20-some minutes for the typical 400 megabyte file. However, after I got the first few, I could keep occupied watching them while downloading more, so I didn’t have to wait. I was able to downloade up to 6 or 8 concurrently with no problem (other than reduced speed per file, of course).
They list a large number of bonus sites and feeds listed as “coming up”, but no bonus sites actually available. Some bonus feed sites are available – e.g., not downloadable. I took a look at a couple and they seem really boring.
Very few of the videos have anal penetration. That is a pro for me and a con for some. Many use condoms openly. That is a plus for me. Most of the girls were shaved, but some were just trimmed – I like the mix. A few of the videos end in creampies, and refreshingly, they don’t belabor the dripping pussy.
There are about 150 videos available. Navigation is by date added, or you can search for the name of the video. Descriptions of the videos are ridiculous and useless, and seem to have no connection to the content (same for the titles). There is a 5-star rating system, which seemed somewhat useful. Generally, I found the 2-star videos to be boring, while some of the 3-star videos were good.
I downloaded and watched about 80 videos. I deleted 40-some immediately as I would never want to watch them again, simply because the sex was mechanical, no chemistry, no excitement. I kept about 25 that had some excitement, chemistry, intimacy, fun, laughing, and most of all, female orgasms. I much prefer when the guy comes from real excitement “right out of the box” over the girls tits or butt. If your tastes are similar to mine, you can save time by starting with these (search for the titles). Remember, the titles bear no relation to the contents. These are in 3 groups, best first, alphabetical within each group. Sorry I can’t put them in a column because of PU’s annoying 40-line restriction here.
Silly chick is in a movie now (my favorite).
Depraved couple; Fyl018; Marki peeping on Silvia; Real homemade video; Red-haired goddess; Silly Cathy; Summer day suck and fuck; W041; W108.
Excited Joyce; F061; H005; Lucky guy and two girls; So nice ass; Too-young-to-have-sex; W047; W111; While her parents are home.
Don’t pull my hair you goon; Every day work on sex skills; F032; Sexy tattooed girl; Shy Marta; W093.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Note: This site consists of some exclusive content as well as some leased content that can be found on other Russian-based porn sites. I will address the exclusive scenes as well as the leased scenes.
-The scenes that are exclusive to this site feature good camera work. Nice zoomed-out camera angles, not too many closeups.
Cons:
-the lighting in some scenes is amateurish, sometimes "dim".
-There is a large amount of leased content that can be found on other sites (if you know Russian porn, you'll recognize a lot of these scenes are from what I call the "Timo Hardy crew"...I call this production group the "Timo Hardy crew" because many of their scenes feature the male actor Timo Hardy. Their scenes all have a very similar look and similar camera work. You'll instantly recognize the look of these scenes if you're familiar with Russian porn. This production group seems to lease out their content to most of the Russian porn sites out there).
-all the scenes on this network are only 25 fps (frames per second). I know some European sites use the 25 fps format, but in this day and age it's about time everyone jumped to 29 fps.
-I wish the "medium" quality downloadable videos were a bit bigger and had higher bit rates. however, the high quality downloadable videos are good, if a bit large (1 to 1.5 gigabytes).
Bottom Line:
Like I said above, this site consists of some exclusive content as well as some leased content that can be found on other Russian-based porn sites, so it's a bit of mixed bag. Teens Analyzed seems to be a collection of all the the anal scenes from this network. It seems that recently this network has taken all of the scenes from it's other anal sites (First Anal Date, and Bang My Teen Ass) and combined them all here to form one large anal site. Once you are a member, when you sign in to First Anal Date, or Bang My Teen Ass, it goes to a page that says all of the scenes have been moved to Teens Analyzed. Since this is the case, they should probably just shut down First Anal Date and Bang My Teen Ass.
There are 3 types of scenes found on this site:
1. There are the leased scenes from the "Timo Hardy crew" which have the typical look that you see in most Russian porn...annoying camera work with way too many closeups. I would guess that many of these scenes can be found on other Russian porn sites like Hardcore Youth, teen mega world, etc. The drawback is that here the scenes are only offered at 25 fps.
2. Then there is another group of scenes from the other site on this network, bangmyteenass.com. These scenes appear to be leased and I found a lot of them available on another network. These scenes feature good camera work and were definitely worth downloading. Great zoomed-out camera angles show of the girls bodies, no time-wasting closeups that plague the "Timo Hardy crew" scenes. Very good stuff.
3. Then there is the exclusive content, which is mostly from the other site on this network, firstanaldate.com. These scenes have their own look and have very good camera work. They have nice zoomed-out camera angles and don't use too many closeups. These exclusive scenes have a bit of an amateurish look, with more amateurish lighting where they often use the light from the camera itself since the room is usually not lit well enough on its own. But overall the quality on these scenes is great and the good camera angles more than make up for the amateurish lighting.
I joined this site for content found in categories 2 and 3 above, since the "Timo Hardy crew" scenes could probably be found elsewhere and with a better frame rate than they are on here. I found some scenes on this site that I already had from other sites, but on this site the scene was dropped to 25 fps, while the version I had from another site was 29 fps. So, if you're joining this site, I would probably avoid the "Timo Hardy crew" scenes, since they are only 25 fps here.
The sex is slower and more sensual which I like (not too much hardcore pounding that plagues many porn sites). There are some very cute girls here that are more rare and aren't as common on the other major Russian porn sites.
Overall Teens Analyzed is a very good Russian anal site. In the end, I found close to 100 scenes here from categories 2 and 3 above. If you are into Russian porn and are looking for some new scenes, I would check this site out. As someone who doesn't like the camera angles used in most Russian porn sites, the zoomed-out camera angles found in some of these scenes were much appreciated. If you are picky about camera angles like me, and you are annoyed by porn that focuses too much on extreme closeups, then there are some great scenes for you here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
01-27-2007:30pm (Update History) Reason: Technical problem that the site fixed.
Pros:
*Added 20 points to score. My membership started out saying it was a trial even though I paid full price. A few days later, the trial part was removed and I had full access and downloads of all scenes.*
I took a risk on an interesting premise and can't say it's bad, but the experience was. The content itself is good.
The concept is recording sex with what I believe are complete amateurs while wearing glasses that record the action.
Very high quality 1080p, I assume that's high quality for recording with their eyeglasses.
A lot of content, but there are multiple buts in this, they have 122 videos and over 1,000 photosets just on this site.
It was not advertised as a network, but once inside it has 15 other sites and says a total of over 1,000 videos and 90,000 photos.
They use Epoch as the billing agent.
Cons:
It took 30 minutes to access the site as it kept telling me my account doesn't exist even though I was using the username and password they sent me!
Once inside the members area it says my account is a trial. It was $15. I have access to I'm going to say maybe 20% of the videos. The others have a pink X on the them and say not for trial members. To see those, I have to upgrade and pay more money. I'm not an angry person, but what's the fucking point of me joining a site for $15 a month then telling me it's a trial that doesn't include everything?
Their frustrating first login was made worse by the login page not being secure. I'm guessing when someone hacks my non-secure login they'll blame that on me too.
Bottom Line:
I saw an advertisement for this and I really thought it was a site about women with glasses. After taking the tour, I saw that it's about video camera glasses recording the pickup, the sex and whatever else goes on (talking, getting to know, etc...)
Here's just a random thought from a scene I watched. Nerdy girl in the library, guy walks up and starts talking to her, they end up in what looks like a hotel having sex. It became very confusing. She had on glasses. The recording wasn't from the guy's eyes perspective. I don't know if they even know what Fucking Glasses is based on. The part that surprised me was this very full network that came with it. There's a reason for that, Fucking Glasses hasn't been updated since 2014. These other network sites have been updated and most of those are NOT for "trial" members.
Just focusing on Fucking Glasses, I have access to TWO of 112 videos.
So, I went ahead and upgraded since I do like how this content looks. It's not worth the trial + upgrade price. The full price came to $44.95. It was $29.95 to upgrade to full membership.
It does seem to be amateur content and it looks like any other amateur site. There's times where the cameraman looks like he/she has a clue and there's time the cameraman looks like he/she is watching a fly on the wall. There's too much going on in some scenes with more than one couple and the one couple scenes are surprisingly formulaic for amateur porn.
The more I've signed in I've noticed there seems to be a hub site called Dirty Flix or that's what the network is called.
The sites amount of content ranges from 1 scene to 368 scenes. With full access they do have 4K on the newer videos and even though I believe it's amateur content it feels more like a Reality Kings Lite or Brazzers Lite.
My opinion of it has went up and down since joining. Since I'm still a member, I don't know if there's a way to join it without going through the $14.95 trial and upgrading for $29.95. At best, this is a $19.95 a month site and that includes downloads.
They advertise 1,000+ videos, 90,000 photos and 620 models. That's not really a very high amount for 16 sites.
The majority of the content is straightforward male/female sex and it follows the pattern most porn sites follow. You can tell I'm more on the down side of my feelings towards the site as my membership is nearing the end and I feel like I wasted $45.
I am figuring price in with my score since if I didn't pay the extra price I wouldn't have been able to access 80-90% of the content. I can be nice about it and say they should look into a new way of billing, a more honest way or I can be blunt and say there's no way I would recommend this site for $44.95. I wouldn't even recommend it for $29.95.
There are a few of the sites that might hit a fetish for some like the Sell your GF site where a boyfriend agrees to let his girlfriend have sex with another guy while he sits and watches. Another is the Fucking Glasses site and She is Nerdy which has the nerd/cum on glasses fetish, but overall, I just can't recommend this network until they figure out how their site is going to work.
They have an updated box on the network in the members area that says once your membership is expired you can still access the site, look at the photos and a few of the videos, which is exactly what my $15 membership fee got me. I'll just write this one up to experience and try to be more careful about joining sites. I went to the site with a different browser and sure enough, it says nothing about the membership being a limited $15 trial. It even says multiple ways to download and stream.
If I had received all the content it said I would for $14.95, I would have scored it in the mid-80s as a network. As it is, I wouldn't score it over a 65.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Hardcore update every two days!!! And most of the girls are gorgeous!
-Great camera work
-Huge amount of back content--23 pages so far with 5 girls each page, all hardcore scenes.
-Exclusive content!--i havent seen any of these scens anywhere else so far...but actually i think i just saw another site that had a few scenes with one of the girls so maybe its not exclusive.
Cons:
-Slow download time for videos, but this isnt a big deal trust me. They come in one big file or in 8 different parts.
Bottom Line:
The best porn site I have ever subscribed to besides Club Sandy. It seems like everytime I come to this site there is a new update..which is great, not to mention the back content is excellent so im never bored with it.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the network sites.
-Network has 1517 movies, 779 models, 1514 photosets. Most of the models are young teens. Many are very attractive.
-Newer movies have both MP4 and WMV file format for downloads. The MP4 format has more options for definition. MP4 has a file definition for Sony PSP, iPhone3 and iPod, a higher definition for iPhone4+ and iPad and Android, then 1080p for Mac and PC, and 4K version.
For steaming, the same movie only has 240p, 720p, 1080p.
That seems like plenty of optins for both streaming and downloading.
But if you're a high-end enthusiast, you're probably going with the 4K, which is only available for downloads, not streaming.
-Regular price for the site (and network) is high:
$120/year
$30/month
But you can find a yearly price of $60/year during holiday specials.
Or $15/month if you don't want a year-long membership.
-There is a zip file for each photoset.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can favorite your favorite movies.
-Navigation is basically simple. You can list the movies by chronology, top rated, most downloaded, etc. Search engine is basic, but does the job.
CONS(START OF):
-Login is not secure. Your browser shows a popup message, when you enter your login details,
"This connection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
A poor way to reward your members who pay for a membership.
-The site update rate is irregular. They tried to update with 2-4 updates per month in 2019 or earlier, but when covid hit, the updates slowed to 1-2 per month. That's for movies. Each movie normally comes with a photoset.
Bottom Line:
X Sensual theme is young girls having sex. With a boy, with another girl, one guy with 2 girls, one girl with 2 guys.
The main draw of the site (and network) is the cute young girls. They are mainly young teens (18-19), and attractive.
They call the videos movies. There's not much plot. You have one or two girls, one or two guys.
They usually start with clothes. There's very little dialog or talking. The girl or girls grab the guy and kiss him and undress him. (There's no seduction or lead-in to the sex. You watch these videos and realize: why bother with plot: let's get to the good stuff, already. And these Russian teens go with the script, which calls for the girls and guys to strip within the first 2-3 minutes and, with maybe some kisses and touches thrown in, start to lick and suck and fuck.
The site title is "X Sensual", but a more apt title would be "Let's Fuck". Because I didn't find much sensual or teasing build-up to the sex.
You can find videos where there's more of a lead-in. That's because the girl or guy is alone, he or she is taking a shower, he or she gets dressed, and then the girl or guy shows up, they talk for a couple of minutes, the girl loosens the guy's belt, pulls down his pants, and starts sucking on his dick.
Actually, the bare-bones plots are probably the result of covid.
If you watch the videos posted in 2019 and earlier, there was more interaction between the models before the sex. There was often some seduction, playfulness, teasing, and the sex scenes were better.
The sets were better. More varied. More expensive-looking. They didn't use the cheap apartments, but apartments that looked nice, or the setting starts in a park, before they move to a nice apartment.
Instead of trying to improve the videos, the site, because of covid, was trying to save money by producing cheaper videos with low-rent apartment buildings, low-rent furniture, and using a plot where you find girls and guys having sex, instead of having some interaction between the players before the sex.
Bare-bones sex becomes boring after a while.
And the cheap sets and cheap clothes the models wear doesn't help.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
The videos from 2019 and earlier are much better to watch than the videos posted in 2020 and later. More build-up to the sex, nicer sets, they were trying to create a quality sex video, instead of mass-produced, cheap sex tapes they've been shooting starting around 2020.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large network of 14 sites
- Nearly 900 scenes on offer
- Updates regularly
- Good mix of Eastern European/Russian and American models
- Wide range of niches offered
- Bills through Epoch
- Effective search function
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- No model names given on main pages
- Download speeds much lower than with similar sites
- No TBP discount
Bottom Line:
I joined this network specifically to get a few scenes with a model whose scenes I collect; otherwise, it would be unlikely that I’d have joined this network. It is a good network of generally mainstream porn and it has a lot to offer but my preference these days is for sites that are more specifically targeted to my interests.
The network is made up of 14 sites, each with a specific niche. These are, in the order they are listed on the network (note that the network offers a mix of American and Eastern European/Russian models. For ease of reference I’ll just refer to these as “EE” in describing the proportion of American to EE):
• Fucking Glasses: POV with the male talent wearing a camera on his head, 116 scenes, adds a scene approximately every three months. Mix of models but older scenes skewed to EE
• She is Nerdy, “nerdy” in this context seems to be that the model wears glasses, 48 scenes, adds one scene per month, mostly EE
• Tricky Agent, casting niche, 57 scenes, new scene approximately every six months, almost entirely EE
• Moms Passions MILF, 11 scenes, no updates since 2014, all EE
• Make Him Cuckold, 60 scenes, last update May 2017, all EE
• Young Courtesans, escort theme with emphasis on beauty and sensuality, 59 scenes, was adding a scene per month but last update was August 2017, All EE
• Disgrace that Bitch, rough sex, 21 scenes, updates monthly, mix of models
• Private Casting X, casting, 86 scenes, adds approximately one scene per month, mix of models
• Trick Your GF, model is duped into sex with someone other than her BF, 43 scenes, adds approximately one scene per month but last was June 2017, All EE
• X Sensual, passion and sensuality, 237 scenes, adds multiple scenes per week, Mostly or all EE
• Brutal X, rough sex, 22 scenes, last updated January 6, 2017, mix of models
• Massage X, massage with sex, 58 scenes, updates monthly, All EE
• Spy POV, POV with an element of hidden cameras, 18 scenes, last update May 2017, All American
• Kinky Family, step-siblings, 31 scenes, two updates per month, All American
It may not be obvious from the list above, but the network does update regularly with approximately two scenes being added per week on the network. If you’re joining for a specific niche check the list above for more specifics on updates.
It appears that the network started with EE models exclusively but as it grew they began using more American models. The most recent sites are almost all American though the older sites that still update use mostly EE models. If you have a preference for one group over the other there are lots of scenes of both, though it is fair to say that the site has many more EE models than American models.
The scenes are offered as both MP4 and WMV. The MP4 scenes are all offered in 1080p (9000kb/s), 720p (2000kb/s), 480p and 320p. 4K has recently been added as an option on the newest scenes. The WMV offers less choice with just 1080p and 480p.
My specific interest is anal sex and there are some here (85) they are all with the EE models. There is no specific anal niche and the scenes are scattered throughout the network. There is a search function that seems to work well.
I found all of the scenes I downloaded to be very good. The porn is all ‘mainstream’ in that it is similar to what is offered by hundreds of other sites. That’s neither good nor bad; it just is what it is.
The site allows download managers and I had no issue with links timing out. I didn’t find any download limits and I downloaded a lot of scenes one weekend so either there is no limit or it is high enough to not impede the average user.
The site bills through Epoch so you can join knowing your personal information is safe and that you can cancel easily.
The site has two major flaws that could be easily fixed. Some readers may not even see these as flaws. The first is that the network and sites only have small thumbnails on the main pages and those don’t list the model. To find who the model is in that scene you need to open the link. I’m not sure why the network would opt to not provide that key information on the main page. The other flaw is that download speeds were, at best, less than one-quarter of what I’m used to seeing and would occasionally drop even lower than that. In 2017 it is rare that I see download speeds this low.
The bottom line is that this is a solid network that has a lot going for it but could also make some key improvements. It is a very good value for someone looking for mainstream porn with a mix of EE and American models. It could be an excellent value if the network offered a TBP discount. While there is nothing specific to recommend this site over any other like it, it is still worthwhile considering a membership.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network.
-Many of the models used are young teens. Many of them are cute or attractive.
-Verotel is the default billing processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but when I had a problem once, Verotel was quick to respond and solve it.
-PU has a link to a discounted membership price of $60/year. Or $15 for the first month.
-Most videos are available in 240p, 720p, 1080p for streaming.
For the last few years, there is a 4K option for video downloads.
-There is photoset of each video, that can be streamed or downloaded.
Cons:
-The last update to the network was Feb 22, 2022. The last update to the site was Feb 11, 2022. Site updates are always slower than network updates, but it looks like the site and the network might have stopped updates.
Until recently, the site gave 2 or 3 updates per month. But it's been 44 days since the last site update. And 33 days since the last network update.
-Regular membership price to Dirty Flix is $120/year. But you can often find a holiday special for $60/year. PU has a link to the Kinky Family site for $60/year membership.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Normal login and member pages are non-secure. But if you put "https" in front of the address bar, you get a secure login, less chance of being hacked. (A tip from PU member exotics4me)
-Ads on every member page. Again, standard for porn sites.
-The photosets are more like a set of screencaps. There is one definition for the zip file, and the photosets are not worth collecting.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The mechanism for playing a slideshow online is primitive. Much better to download the zip file and use your computer's program to play the slideshow. Except most photosets are low quality screen caps that are not worth viewing.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Kinky Family focuses on what I call fake incest: sex between step-relatives, which is one of the more popular niches in the last few years.
I don't know why people think sex between step-relatives is thrilling or perverted, but I guess that most people have a legal bent that wants to criminalize sex, because sex is dirty and illegal and let's make whoopee and fuck over as many people as we can. That's always a fun thing to do.
You sit on a curb and smoke a cigarette, and a guard or cop can accuse you of loitering.
And tell you to move on. That's true, even if it's still legal to smoke in that area.
The site has 144 movies.
All the movies feature late teen, early 20s models.
Many of them are cute or attractive.
The plots are girls fucking with their step-brothers, or their step-fathers. The plots are thin, but the girls are attractive. So who cares if the dialog might be trite, the situations unrealistic. These girls are fucking attractive.
You watch these videos, and your body responds.
Kamryn Jayde, Ellie Idol, Paris White, etc.
Ellie Eilish is named "Ellie Idol" at this site, and her age is given as 33 for the video posted Feb 10, 2020.
My guess is that Ellie Eilish is being confused with some other model.
The video was posted Feb 10, 2020, when Ellie Eilish was 18 or 19.
Ellie Eilish is an American model/porn actress, who first appeared in porn in Nov 2019 at FTVgirls.com, and has since appeared at over 25 other sites.
A cute girl, slender, white, expressive face, puts on a great show. She's one of the better actresses in porn. No matter how stupid the plot or dialog, she comes across as a young teen with issues, and you believe her, she establishes an instant connection, you feel for her, and God, you wish it was you pounding away on that slim, tender young body.
Porn is fantasy. And she draws you into that fantasy.
I'm saying the videos are good to great. That's not because of the stupid plots. But the models are young and attractive. The video style is fake reality porn, but it works. Because you focus on the girls. And their bodies. And the videos can make you horny. Which is the purpose of porn.
Bottom line: This is a large site. 144 movies. It's not updating currently. So that's a negative. And the stupid plots are a negative. But the girls are attractive, and the sex is what I call bread-and-butter, which means you get a mixture of pussy licking, cock sucking, vaginal sex. The taboo of fake-incest is supposed to add heat to the scenes. Step-brother fucking his step-sister, step-father fucking his step-daughter.
So if you are into teen porn, and can ignore the stupid plots, this site (and network) is a worthwhile join.
The $60/year membership price is a bonus.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price:
With a PU discount, first month is $14.95, recurs at $29.95/month.
But PU has a discounted price of $59.95/year (recurring).
-3,100+ scenes for the network.
-The network has current updates (around 2 new videos per week).
-The billing processors are Segpay, Epoch and Vendo, all trusted names.
-Network provides access to 17 sites.
-Free lifetime access for ex-members. Ex-members still get limited access to network content.
-They recently updated the login to a secure page (https). But the member pages are still not secure.
-Most content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-Although login is now secure, the member pages are not secure.
-The homepage and video listing is out-dated. The thumbnails are small, need to be brighter and more attractive, to make the content more appealing. This is basic marketing: the videos themselves can be poor to very good, but they deserve a more appealing presentation.
-Member pages have ads on every page.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
This is a teen-orientated network. Almost all the models are late teens, early 20s.
Many of them are cute or attractive.
You will find many of the same models at other teen networks like Teen Mega World, Wow network, even some at the Metart network.
There are 17 sites in the network. So the sites cover a wide range of teen niches. Most of the sites are archives that haven't updated in years.
The newer vidoes have a 4K definition download option. Videos from about 4 years old and older mainly have a 720p or 1080p download option. The videos from Jun 2009 have a resolution of 320x240p through 720x576p. The streaming for the videos prior to that date is limited to 240p or 480p.
A lot of the oldest videos are not worth watching or collecting. The problems are poor lighting, poor focus and cheap sets. The lighting is so dim in some early videos it's difficult to see what the model looks like.
The older photosets are also not worth collecting. They are screencaps, with poor lighting, poor focus, cheap sets, cheap costumes (the costumes are cheap street clothes that look like they were bought at a rummage sale). The earliest videos are even worse than the earliest videos at Teen Mega World, which also started out as a low-rent teen hardcore network, but even when Teen Mega World was starting out, with low-rent clothes, low rent settings, they still did a better job with their videos and photosets than the 18videoz network. And as time went on, the Teen Mega World network spent their profits on better lighting, better equipment, to make the videos and photosets have higher production values, so that today, the Teen Mega World videos and photosets are good to excellent, and are just a few steps below the Wow network videos and photosets. Teen Mega World is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks, just below the Wow network. The models at Wow network are among the finest looking teens on the internet, and the production values, the clear crisp videos and photosets are borderline glamour in quality and style.
For teen hardcore porn, Teen Mega World and the Wow network are my two favorite networks.
I'm giving the 18Videoz network a score of 82.
Negatives are that most of the sites stopped updating years ago.
The network only updates with 1 new video every 3 or 4 days.
The videos and photosets have improved over time. But there's too much old content that is ultra-low quality.
The low membership price is one of the strengths of the network.
But I prefer Teen Mega World network and the Wow network over the 18Videoz network.
Bottom line:
The 18Videoz network should deserve a higher score. There are some really cute models at the network. And there are some worthwhile videos to see. But there's too much trash that buries the good videos, so it's really hit or miss if you want to find the better quality videos at the network.
I've listed the 17 sites you get access to in the 18Videoz network in the first reply to this review:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
None
Cons:
Inadequate content updates
Current updates are older content with new download choices
Bonus feeds and sites require long term membership
Too pricey for available content
Unable to find specific advertised clips
Nonexclusive content
Old, unoriginal material
Bottom Line:
Near as I can tell, all updated material in the past month are old footage being updated for DIVX downloads. About 30% of the content can be found on others sites. Bonus material requires commitment to access. There are better ways to waste $30.00 USD. Recommend choosing something else.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Part of large network of Russian teens
* Very good quality videos
* Maintains an amateur feel with typical Russian sets - this is not intended to be a glamour site
* Hot Russian teens
* Heaps of bonus sites
* Download managers with no issues
* Good download speeds
* No spam
* Easy to navigate your way around
Cons:
* The sites could be better organized
* Model names are inconsistent not only across the different sites but also within the same site
Bottom Line:
These sites seem to have gone through a revamp and tidied up their act - but there is still room for improvement. If you join one site, you get access to all the others - except for TeenCasualSex; for some reason, this site doesn't give you access to the other networks.
The video quality is very good for the newer videos (from 2012) with 1080p and bitstream rate of 6000+. Of course, the older content is not as good - but then isn't that true for all sites?
There are a lot of beautiful Russian (and some Czech) teens here. Yes, you'll see them on Teen Mega World but I really liked this network - maybe I just got bored with TMW. The sets are nothing glamorous, which I liked because it gave the scenes are more realistic feel rather than the typical white-washed, overexposed, glamour sites that seem to be the fashion right now. If you've been to Russia or to a Russian home, then you'll know that the settings are authentic.
What I liked is seeing the teens doing their stuff. You see teen couples - unlike most American sites where it's "teen" girls with much, much older men.
There are model names listed for each scene and you can search them but the names can be inconsistent. Also, it was irritating that despite being a network, you have to enter your username and password for each site - and you cannot elect your own username or password.
When joining I looked at several sites and noticed that not all offer the same terms. Some offer 1 month + 7 days for the full price, but I joined through this one and got a reduced price for 1 month.
Updates are not that frequent: on average there is one or two across the entire network.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price. I joined for $59.95 for a yearly membership. I don't think this was a special discouted price, just the price I paid when I clicked on the network link at PU.
Note: when I click on the link from PU, I see much higher prices now:
$29.95/month
$119.95/year
If I had seen those prices, I would not have joined.
-Young Sex Parties is part of the 18Videoz network. So you get access to about 8 different porn sites at the 18Videoz membership.
Edit: I joined through the 18Videoz site, which includes the Young Sex Parties site.
If you join through the Young Sex Parties site, the much higher prices are what is shown. But you also get access to more sites. However, I believe the lower price of the 18Videoz is the better deal, because it gives you the flavor of the content offerings.
-The 18Videoz network advertises 3,200+ scenes, 2,246 models, 2,454 photosets.
-Edit: I don't know whether it's a mistake or not, but I see about 17 different sites at the 18Videoz network.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Which would seem to include all sites included with a Young Sex Parties membership.
So if you want to join Young Sex Parties, I would definitely join through the 18Videoz membership, which is far cheaper.
Sometimes you come across sites which have different membership prices, and the cheapest membership gives you all the privileges of the higher priced memberships. It's just sloppy marketing, but it happens.
-Young Sex Parties has 255 movies. So it's a fairly large site.
-It't still updating. But at a slow rate. One new video per month. But you have a large site, and access to the rest of the 18Videoz network, which includes over 3,000 videos. Plus, the network advertises daily updates. However, many sites or networks advertise daily updates, and don't deliver.
I think this is because they maybe did offer daily updates, and when they stopped, they didn't change the advertising/description to reflect the current reality
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
I've seen many sites that still advertise update rates, that is not currently true.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
Edit: I rarely download any more. But I don't see any notice of a download limit. And The Best Porn states there is no download limit.
-I believe the content is exclusive. I've never seen the content duplicated at any porn site, except for the tube sites, which seem to sample almost ever porn site I've ever joined, even content from MetArt, if you can believe. Not the MetArt photosets, but the MetArt videos.
-Downloads are offered in MP4 and WMV formats.
-The videos stream smoothly. No buffering problems.
-You can view the photosets online, manually, or as a slide show.
-I believe the photosets are screencaps, but good screencaps made from a good software program.
The photos are OK to good quality, but I wish the quality was better, because some of these girls are really cute. Note: almost all the girls are attractive to really attractive. These are real teens. Not thirty-year-olds trying to look like teens.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Login and member pages are non-secure. So easier for hacking.
-I wish the thumbnails on the video listing were larger, so I could see the models more clearly.
-I also wish they put the name of the model(s) on the video listing, so I could tell who the model is more easily, rather than needing to click on the video to bring up the video itself to see what the model looks like.
-There are ads for other sites, in large thumbnails, but in my current mood, I can ignore them somewhat, but I'm always looking for cute models, and sometimes I click on the ads to see what the site is (that's being advertised), and what the models at that site look like.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Young Sex Parties theme: Going to a party, having sex. Very casual sex. Not a lot of romance or build-up.
Categories: Amateur, Anal Fingering, Anal Sex, Asian, Ass Licking, Behind The Scenes, Big Boobs, Big Cock, Bisexual, Blonde, Blowjob, Brunette, Cream Pie, Double Penetration, Fetish, Foursome, Group Sex, Hairy, Handjob, Interracial, Lesbian, Masturbation, Mature, Outdoor, POV, Pornstar, Public Fucking, Redhead, Small Tits, Solo, Squirt, Teens, Threesome, Toys, Voyeur
Movies: 255 currently.
Both MP4 and WMV formats are offered for download.
Videos download in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
The models are real teens. Cute or attractive. From Eastern Europe, I assume.
Most of the videos I've seen have no subtitles, but who needs subtitles when most of the words I hear them speaking are "UUUUUhhhhh, AAhhhhhh, GGGrrroooannnhhh, UU, AA, uuunnnn, (choking sounds as she's sucking a dick).
Some of the sex parties videos are not real parties, but just a boy and girl fucking, or two boys on one girl fucking.
Or some other combination of one or more boys, and one or more girls.
I would say the site features bread-and-butter sex. There is little build-up, everyone knows they are they to put on a show, and they start to have sex. Vaginal, anal, cock sucking, slapping the girl's ass, with lots of moaning and groaning from both the girls and boys. Usually, most porn, it's the girl who is moaning and screaming, but at this site, the boys are equally vocal.
I'm afraid that in my current frame of mind, I get easily bored by straight fucking. I much enjoy plot-driven sex to add some meaning to the sex. Or maybe some nice costumes or nice settings.
Here the settings are plain: not cheap, but not expensive. Just an ordinary room or bedroom, with a couch or bed where the action takes place.
I must say, the girls really appear enthusiastic about sucking dick, and getting fucked.
And the stunt cocks are good or excellent. You've probably seen them at different porn paysites, because, while I don't know their names, I've seen over a hundred videos at Teen Mega World and the Wow sites and elsewhere, featuring some of these stunt cocks. And the stunt cocks still look like teens, or at least in their early twenties, even though they've been in the business for years.
Starting Feb 17, 2017:
Free access for expired members
From now on all expired members get free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help.
I think that is a fine offer. I'm still an active member, but even if your membership expires, you will still be able to access the sites, and see all the picture sets, plus some other features.
Bottom Line: If you are satisfied with plain bread-and-butter sex, this site (and the network) should prove a good choice. You get, for a very low price ($60/year for the 18Videoz network), a ton of hardcore teen videos. I'm giving the site (with network access) a score of 85.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The girls are young and really beautiful.
- Most videos start with a pick-up scene, on the street, a bridge, a party, a mall, etc. These are badly acted but the scenery is interesting, it is nice to see the girl in clothes, and these are the most creative part of this site.
- Quite a few different men.
- Lighting in videos is uniformly good.
- The location is not always the same.
Cons:
- Only 50-some videos.
- The price is way too high for the small number of videos and their bad quality.
- Girls rarely get aroused, and are very quiet when they do have orgasms.
- The camerawork is unbelievably bad, extremely jerky nearly all the time, like the camera-person has Parkinson's? Just horrible, consistently so.
- Jackhammer mechanical sex.
- Some fake ejaculations.
- No names given for actors/actresses, so you can't search for their other videos.
- There is often a lot of distracting traffic noise outside the apartment, and/or amazingly squeaky beds.
- Still photos poor. Even when the actress was gorgeous, I usually couldn't find stills that I wanted to keep.
- Poor support. I emailed a question before subscribing and received no answer.
Bottom Line:
- All videos are boy-girl (some threesomes).
- Most girls have smallish breasts (yay!), but a few have large gorgeous natural ones. Implants are rare (yay!).
- No anal (yay!).
- Few if any facials (yay!). Ejaculation on the belly and tits, or a few creampies. Often the guys jack themselves off for way too long (boo).
- Condoms rare (boo!).
- The guys are young and slim and good looking but don't seem to know how to do anything except jackhammer with a deadpan face (sound familiar?).
- Very few closeups. I would have liked some brief closeups of the girls' faces.
I was quite disappointed with this site. The couples have a mindset that they're being paid to fuck, and fuck they do, but very few of the girls or guys take any erotic pleasure in it. The girls seem really inhibited about showing any enjoyment, and they seem embarassed to show any pleasure during cunnilingus (which is sometimes skipped and often brief). Nobody seems to be having fun.
This site is done by the same group as YoungLibertines. (See my review of that site for some technical points that I won't repeat here.) The website design is identical, but the content is worse. I was able to find about 20 videos at YoungLibertines that were worth keeping (out of 80 that I watched, so 25%), while here, I found only a few, but barely worth keeping (~5% -- I watched all 50). Overall, I felt that I wasted my time and money.
In my opinion (see my profile for my tastes), the best are Spontaneous Sex, Girl At The Student Party, Splashes of Champagne and cum, Welcome Fuck.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
New reality Boy/Girl sex site
30 exclusive scenes and growing
Fresh faces, normal models
Regular updates
Download full length scenes or 6-7 clips WMV
1 month membership with bonus 7 days added
Entire Photo gallery zip files
Cons:
Only one update added every other week
Camera work leaves a lot to be desired
Full Length clips are very large 250-400 MB
The only bonus content are non-exclusive feeds
Bottom Line:
This is a reality site where a camera man and
young guy seduce a willing woman into having
sex on film. Not sure why the term Abused is
in the title. The ladies look like normal
everyday Girl-Next-Door types. The cool thing
is a lot of the scenes include dildo or toy usage.
To me, this site is a good one to check out when
you get tired of watching non-exclusive content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-197 videos. Not huge, but still good sized for a hardcore teen site.
-They updated the online video player in 2016.
-Expired members get free limited access to the website. You can see all picture sets, some videos, and a preview of the latest updates.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not the biggest name in payment processors, but I've used them many times, and never had a problem.
-The models are late teens or early 20s. Not super attractive, but not ugly.
-PU gives a discount of $14.95 for the first month.
-PU also gives a discounted yearly membership of $59.95/recurring.
-Membership in 18Flesh gives you access to over 9 main hardcore teen sites.
-More recent videos are up to 4K definition for other sites in the network.
-Althogh 18 Flesh is not updating, the network is updating, so there is fresh material to enjoy.
-After you've logged in to the site/network a few times, the site will normally recognize you, so you don't need to re-enter your login details each time.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can vote on each video, up or down. Considering the last video was posted over 8 years ago, there are very few votes on most videos, and the number of downloads of most videos is often less than 1,000, which means very few people have bothered to collect these videos.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-This is an archive site. The last update was on 2011-12-15.
-Non-secure login. Meaning your login details are easily hacked.
-Non-secure member pages. Meaning the pages you visit are recorded by your ISP and available to spy agencies and the police as needed.
-The username and password are computer generated, so you need to write them down.
-The video definition is low: you have a choice of 240p or 480p. Most PU members would require a far higher definition, if possible.
Bottom Line:
Site Videos 197
Site Models 2241
Site Photosets 2439
The Best Porn states the 18 Videoz network had 3,027 video on 2018-06-27.
On 2020-03-12, the number of videos is 3198.
171 videos added in 20 months indicates a slow update rate to the network.
The 18 Flesh site itself stopped updating on 2011-12-15.
You get 2 additional bonus sites with a membership (the 1-day trial membership do not get access).
The sites are Teens Analyzed and 18 Pussy Club.
The also have a live sex cams channel, with over 2,300 models.
Many of the models are men, so I assume that is for gay audiences.
(Man, not interacting with a woman.)
I'm not interested in cam shows, so I didn't investigate the cam shows, even though there are both "online", "party", and "gold" shows available.
The cam shows can be viewed in English, French, Spanish, Italian, German, Swedish, Portuguese, Dutch, Norwegian.
You can also select the chat show by geographic region:
North America/UK/Australia
Western Europe
Central Eastern Europe
Central/South America
Asia
Africa
The live cams also have a calendar, where they list the time and date of special chat events: WildOnCam, Squirtamania, ErotiqueTV.
The calendar only lists 3 or 4 days of upcoming days' events.
Although I believe the videos at 18 Flesh are professionally shot, with good lighting, framing, color and sound control, and ok-looking models, the videos are just hardcore sex with little eroticism or flavor. I quickly found them boring.
I enjoy the videos at Teen Mega World much better: I think the models are more attractive, and the girls put on a better show.
And the videos at Wow Girls and Wow Porn are at a higher level, because of how fucking attractive the models can be: and the technical factors (lighting, color, sound, framing) are excellent.
I'm giving 18 Flesh a score of 76.
Because in addition to 18 Flesh, you get access to a number of other sites in the network.
And if you are into cams, the cam shows might be interesting.
Except I can't evaluate the cam shows, because I have no interest in them.
What I do find interesting about the cam shows is that there is apparently a large number of shows for gay clients.
If you don't require girls that are very attractive, that put on a good show of enjoying a sexual experience, if you only require a guy plugging a girl's mouth, pussy and ass, then you could score the site higher. I want to watch attractive girls, and I hope that they will put on a show that convinces me they are enjoying themselves, so I'm willing to pay more for an upgraded experience.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
