Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Kink.com is among the best (if not the best) BDSM provider on the internet
- Very user-friendly – easy to navigate and download
- Part of a larger network of BDSM sites
- All exclusive videos
- A mix of settings (some outdoors in Europe and some inside at Kink’s Armories
- Excellent value for the monthly fee
- Very unique content. I’m not aware of any other content quite like this on the web
- Discount access to other sites on the network
- Excellent customer service
- Regular updates
Cons:
None. I mean that. In my last review of this site it was just new and didn’t have a lot of scenes up. Now there are in excess of 90 with more being added regularly.
Bottom Line:
It’s certainly no secret to anyone who has read any of my other reviews of sites on the Kink.com network, but I’m a huge fan of this company. Obviously it’s essential that I’m a fan of BDSM too, and for anyone who is, Kink.com offers the best BDSM sites available.
When I last reviewed Public Disgrace it was a relatively new site to the network that catered to a very unique niche: BDSM and BDSM-related activities outdoors and indoors in public settings. As the site has grown it has continued to serve this niche and serve it very well.
The niche, as you can tell from past reviews, puts a woman in a BDSM situation, with various forms of bondage and discipline, and brings her into public. In my opinion, the site can be divided into two broad but distinct categories: public outdoor with real public looking on, and public but in a controlled environment. The site is relatively equally divided between these two sub-niches.
The public outdoor scenes are very unique. They are shot in Europe, where the religious right obviously hold little influence. A woman in some form of bondage may be made to walk in a public square with her arms bound and her skirt around her ankles. Or perhaps on a bus. Sex is often included, but not normally right out in public, though it is outdoors and the public is nearby. These scenes are very unique and very interesting, though sometimes I can feel a little uncomfortable for the public who happen by.
The second broad sub-niche are scenes filmed in some setting like a bookstore, a bar or a hardware store. These seem to be a bit more staged than the real public ones, and part of that feeling comes from the ability to control access. The result is that there is usually more sex involved. This sub-niche also includes scenes shot at the Kink.com Armories in San Francisco. These scenes are more like a BDSM gangbang. Both of these types of scenes are very well done and are also interesting.
On the technical side, the site offers video in various formats and scenes that are downloadable in segments or as a whole. There are pictures, and zips are available.
For a site with this amount of very unique photos and videos, the price offers excellent value. Once you’re a member of any of the Kink.com sites you can get discounted access to the others. While some sites, like Society SM and their related sites, now offer five sites with one membership, I can’t fault Kink.com for not doing this. The sites within Kink.com are all unique and are easily able to stand on their own.
Public disgrace is an amazing site offered by a company that obviously cares about its product and customers. I highly recommend taking a membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Content appears original
- Fairly easy to navigate
- Can use download manager
Cons:
- Videos poor quality
- Complete vids not available
- Updates very few and far between (doesn't appear to be much new at all)
- Basic design
- Content is poorly directed
Bottom Line:
I have a biased view when it comes to my porn (anyone who doesn't needs professional help imho) and when it comes to sites that rely on pics as much or more than vids it is about the quality and eroticism.
Exhibitionism can be very erotic and not something that has to "hit you in the face" with its bluntness. Unfortunately for UK Flashers, it falls sqaurely into the category of "blunt" in its approach.
Before I get onto the aspects of quantity, I'd like to look at the quality of the content, mostly as it is what is sticking out most to me.
Many of the models are not actually models by trade (yeah, obvious to many that they are working girls, but there are still those out there who believe that they are simply models trying to break into the industry.)
Whilst the models will have a concept of poses etc, a majority of the work and direction is carried out by the photographer. The photographer used for this site appears to have a complete lack of imagination (or interest) and the results are the same poses with the only variation being the location.
As for the poses themselves and the camera angles used? Unflattering on the models to say the very least, amateur in production, completely lacking in eroticism (many are plain seedy.) It's as though a bored 18 year old has gone out with his dad's camera, collared a few girls and led with the direction, "Show us yer gash!" There are user submitted sites out there with more professional content than here!
Harsh? Maybe, but combined with so few updates, a basic and tired design and layout and vid quality from early dsl days, this is a site that I'd struggle to recommend for even half the price that I paid.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Models seem to know what they're doing
- Site created by people who understand the niche
- Good range of models / situations
- Appears natural (not forced or heavily scripted)
Cons:
- Photos cannot be downloaded in .zip format
- Vids have to be watched/downloaded in clips only
- Appears to be no recently update photo sections
- Average number of shoots
- Get impression of recycled content
- Some content non-exclusive
- Site needs some work to bring it up to the standards that other sites have adopted as they have evolved over the years.
Bottom Line:
As a brand new user (not a former site member who's returned) this content all looks new to me, although the odd shoot with 1999/2000 imprinted on it is a bit of a give away with a lot of video quality and a few other artefacts in the background.
If you are a previous member, my advice, stay away there is a very good chance that you've seen all this material already and would be wasting your money reinvesting. This is no Met-Art when it comes to purity of archiving.
For new members though; I'm glad to say that the site is what it sets out to be, with a broad section of models and the producers make the most of the fairly limited number of variables that you can have in public exposure.
However, the site does then begin to let itself down in its presentation.
The design of the site tells you that it has seen little updating to code etc in the years that it has been live. Navigation is reasonable with a rudimentary gallery for each section.
Picture and vid quality then begins to show the age of both the site and shoots, and the lack of .zip downloads for photo galleries and only being able to view vids as clips leaves the site out there with other turn of the millenium businesses that have failed to move on. It is a shame really as with a few basic updates and more shoots this could be a great site that is already aiming well at a niche category.
Overall quality of shoots (other than viewing quality) is good, although it is bizarre that on some shoots where a model has clearly been out for about an hour there are only about 12 pics???? With basic flashing, maturbation, public participation and even oral sex/facials so plenty to go round and the site producers know exactly where to be aiming (unlike some sites who aim for a niche and completely miss as they've no idea or interest in it themselves, so well done there.
My view. Not bad; with a bit of work it could be great, but not bad.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 20 or at least 15 scenes/parties where male strippers show up, as far as I could tell (navigation made it hard to see all videos) but each video/scene is divided in multiple video clips (around 10-14 each) and there are multiple women/girls who have sex in each larger scene.
- Each scene has screencaps as well as actual photos (around 400 per scene at 800px × 600px each). Couldn't find any zipped files though.
- The scenes are kinda fun as one stripper is dressed as a bear and never removes his mask. Also the girls, look relatively amateur-ish/ new to porn.
- Supposedly updates every Wednesday, but I couldn't vouch for this as I have only been a member for a week and nothing updated yet.
15
Cons:
- No downloads of videos.
- Quality for streaming videos is "madman" whatever that means in pixels.
- Had trouble streaming many of the videos. The "madman" quality setting makes the videos very slow. They do look pretty good though...
- The whole site feels like a bad jock related joke. I know I complained about this before regarding some of the Porn Pros sites but it's even worse here. Comments like: "OMFG she swallows!" or "Was it as good for you as it was for me?" or the "Madman" streaming option make the whole site have a run by teenagers feel to it. I guess it's okay if you like that but sometimes it can get frustrating.
- The light and camerawork can get a bit frustrating at times. The quality could be improved.
- The navigation was frustrating and the live cam ads were very poorly placed on the home page.
Bottom Line:
Overall I'd give this site a miss. The idea is cool and some of the reactions the girls have to the guy's dick on top of their head made me laugh. Furthermore some of the girls are really cute and the crowd around the stripper could be a real turn-on for people who prefer group sex, nonetheless when you consider the difficulties in streaming the videos, lack of download options, funky navigation, and sometimes frustrating camerawork. It's simply not worth it.
The small amount of content also doesn't help. I felt like the webmasters knew they only had a few videos so they chose to make them streaming because otherwise members would download them in a month and never return.
Also i had a personal problem with the attitude of the people involved in running the website. I like my porn to be funny once in a while but I don't like to feel like I'm watching a bunch of frat boys high-fiving each other. A more mature approach to the site design and the directing of the videos could help improve the overall feel.
Finally, I didn't really enjoy the way the scenes were structured. I realize this might be a very personal thing but I prefer it when a scenes has only a few actors that go all the way. The very design of this site means that the male stripper will be walking around and random ladies will suck on his penis for a few minutes before he moves on. This can be hot but when a cute girl is replaced by one that doesn't do it for me I kinda feel bored...if that makes any sense...
Anyhow, the last two points are rather personal so I will try not to deduct any points from the final score for that. I just wanted to convey that the site was a tad bit disappointing in what it offered.
On the bright side Dancing Bear comes as a bonus in a bunch of other network deals so it may be worth checking out like that; otherwise, unless you have a really big fetish for dudes in bear costumes or sex at a party this is not really worth the membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. A Kink.com site, one of the most user-friendly group of fetish sites on the web. Quality of videos/photography is in the upper tier of all fetish sites on the web (and I've checked out most of them over the last few years).
2. Gangbang and public humiliation theme with the spice of some bondage, spanking, rough sex similar to others found on Kink.com websites.
3. Quantity of videos is smaller than other Kink websites, but improves with regular updates.
4. Lots of outdoor action with an audience sometimes participating.
5. Interesting before and after interviews with models gives a good understanding of this type of consentual sex.
Cons:
I could suggest minor ways to improve the shoots to fulfill my fetish preferrences, but I can't begrudge the overall attempt by the producers to include a variety of material in scenes (some of which I'm not particularly interested in), but it's fun searching for the stuff I like with fast forward.
Bottom Line:
Overall a worthwhile user friendly site for fetish fans, especially public outdoor and gangbang, at a reasonable price $29.95/mo USD.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Epoch.
-No DRM or download restrictions.
-Supports download managers.
-All exclusive content.
-47 beautiful quality WMV HD at 1280x720, 7158 kbps. Competes with the best available on the internet.
-Can stream or download as WMV HD, MP4, ipod MP4, or lesser quality WMV as 960x540, 2140 kbps.
-Both clips and whole movie options.
-Photosets for every video. Zipdownloadable screenshots, 1200x675.
-Updates once a week.
-Discounted membership for joining other kink.com sites.
Cons:
-In spite of the growth this site has had, it is still too expensive at $29.95.
-The outdoor scenes did nothing for me. They are more like exhibitionism than really hot sex.
Bottom Line:
The videos here come in three types.
The one I enjoyed the least were shot outdoors in Eastern Europe, and just did not work well. I like exhibitionism, but not these videos. They seem to lack a focus. I couldn't figure out if they want to be an exhibitionist site or a sex focused site.
However the other two types of video were excellent. One was of BDSM gangbangs held at the armory that is often seen in other kink.com sites. The two themes combined lends a feeling of depravity that the participants, the girls and the viewer can really get into. The girls are humiliated in a very sexy way. Highly recommended if this is something you might like.
The other type of video is shot on location. Sometimes they are gangbangs in a lesbian, biker or heterosexual bar, or in a bookstore, pastry shop etc. I am sure the location was closed to limit the involvement to those who are preselected and tested for disease, but the spontaneous amateur feel is intense. Also highly recommended for those this may appeal to.
My general feel here is that the site has the best HD quality, adequate quantity, and a very unusual intensely erotic theme. Very highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Discounted join price. See below.
-Part of network of 21 sites. However, only 3 or 4 are worth checking out.
-162 videos, 720x480, 2139kbps, averaging about 20 minutes.
-Can download segments as well as whole video. WMV is the only option.
-162 photo sets.
-Genuine amateurs, so attractiveness varies. Very much look like girls you could know.
Cons:
-Videos are very grainy and blurry. I would guess that the originals were shot as low resolution and poor quality, despite being upgraded later.
-Download limit of 12 hours of content, which is less than 4GB. If you go over the limit, you get banned for 6 hours.
-No streaming option for videos.
-No update schedule. The videos are not dated. I saw a review from 2007 that had only 2 fewer videos, so I think it is no longer updating.
-None of my download managers worked.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable. Horrible quality screenshots that are 150x100.
Bottom Line:
If you go to the webpage you can get an idea of what the site is like. If you x to navigate away, you get an offer of half price, $14.95 per month.
The site consists of content that is very similar to the dreamgirls dvd series that now has over 500 titles and has been around since 1995. The similarity is so strong that I suspect that this material is from those videos. However, this site appears not to be updating.
The videos consist of scenes from Mardi Gras in New Orleans, Fantasy Fest, spring break t shirt contests in Key West, and dancing in clubs. The girls are quite natural looking amateurs, with many being quite attractive.
As you would expect with amateurs, you never know how far they will go in exposing themselves. Some go only topless, some completely nude. Occasionally you get a few seconds of lesbian sex or cock sucking, but that is rather rare and not what the site is about.
If you can get into basically just flashing, you will like the content. BUT, the video quality here is really poor and much is virtually unwatchable. The site has a great concept, but not at all well done.
If you like this material, your choices are very limited. You can buy the dreamgirls DVD's, which can be found for about $10 each for 90 minutes. Another alternative is to go to dreamgirlsvod.com for on demand streaming that can get expensive, or sign up at dreamgirlsmembers.com, which is streaming only with no downloads available.
I would like the site to be much bigger than 62 videos and the quality is just too low. Not recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM or download limits.
-Supports download managers with excellent download speeds. Mine was 2500kb.
-Videos available as excellent DVD quality MP4 or as WMV 1280x720,7158kbps.
-Videos can be streamed. Downloads come as clips, while whole videos can be zipdownloaded, and in a few cases can be downloaded as whole videos as well as in clips.
-Photosets for every video. Can be zipdownloaded. They are screenshots that are 1200x675 and very sharp. Mostly landscapes.
-Exclusive material. Some are known pornstars, many are not.
-Mostly very attractive women. Better than the overall quality on sexandsubmission.com.
-Mostly the girls seem to be really into the action. They don't come across as fake, just going through the motions until it is over.
-Updates at least once a week. Sometimes they update in only 3 or 4 days. Should grow fast if they continue.
-Very active member forum with suggestions for future shoots.
-Discounted membership for joining other kink.com sites.
Cons:
-The site is still young and small. With 20 videos it is growing fast, but seriously needs growth.
-At the moment it is still too expensive.
-The same male actor in all of the outdoor videos. Boring guy, not my cup of tea. I don't generally care about male actors, but I just don't like him. The videos need a variety of males.
-The outdoor sex videos could have more interaction with the public. In a few of the videos they are included in some way, but mostly they are there doing nothing erotic, such as walking by. In some cases they have their faces blurred. This makes the videos have a real feel to them, but I can see this done better.
Bottom Line:
This is only my second site that I would rate as 90. Very few sites have the type of appeal that this one does for me. The videos come in two types. Those shot in the US are shot in the same armory as is used in other Kink.com sites. These are a combination of bdsm and gangbangs. On the forum there is an ongoing discussion among the members as to whether or not these fit the theme of "public". I thought they were exceptionally hot and don't care if they fit the theme. I would definitely join just to see these. At the moment the site has 20 videos and 7 of these are the gangbang ones. The other 13 involve bdsm, humiliation, and sex in public. Shot in Eastern Europe, they are very interesting, but not as much as the gangbang videos. Overall the site is very hot, with great quality videos and pictures. It most definitely works for me. If you like light bdsm with a focus on male domination and sex, I expect you will love this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Kink hits another home run.
- Very unique videos if you're into bondage and voyeurism together.
- Videos, sound, locations, models are all up to Kink's usual standards (which is to say excellent)
- Download speeds are decent.
Cons:
- Site is small as it just opened (as of the date I'm writing this).
Given it's current size the price is a bit high.
Bottom Line:
Kink has knocked another one out of the park.
Just for the benefit of those who don’t know Kink’s work, they are a BDSM-themed group with a number of sites. Because of the twists that they add to the BDSM theme the sites tend to be very innovative, like Fucking Machines or Water Bondage. The tone of the videos isn’t demeaning though like you get with Max Hardcore or some of the stuff from Sweet Entertainment Group. Kink goes out of its way to make it clear that this is all consensual, but they also do that in a way that doesn’t interfere with the overall fantasy of the scene.
Public Disgrace is the newest addition to the Kink stable. The theme is public humiliation, public bondage and public sex. If that is something that you’re interested in, this site warrants a look. As of today (October 7, 2008) there are only nine videos posted. While that doesn’t seem like a lot you have to consider the production values of those nine scenes. Kink’s standards are second to none in the industry. Consider that Kink bought and uses a huge old armory in San Francisco. They take their business seriously.
As it stands now with the nine available videos, they can be classed into two distinct types. There are the videos shot (apparently) in Eastern Europe using Eastern European models on public streets, buses, etc, and then there are the videos shot in Kink’s armory in San Francisco. Obviously the American authorities would be less likely to turn a blind eye to a bound girl walking naked down the street, so the ‘public’ element in the American videos means bringing in a bunch of guys to have their way with a bound woman. I know this sounds like just a gangbang, but adding bondage adds a whole new and unique element. (Check out Sarah Jane Ceylon’s video for proof of that)
As for the Eastern European videos that are truly public, I find that there is a bit of a cringe factor. I have no idea how many of the people watching are warned, but I suspect that Kink does go to some effort to make sure that no minors are around and that no one who doesn’t want to be exposed to this is exposed. There is a bus scene with Valentina Blue that has to have the cooperation and consent of everyone on the bus. If Kink does get those permissions they keep them hidden so as not to spoil the public fantasy.
Price will be an issue, and I agree with that. Right now the price seems high for only having nine videos available. (I’m assuming that Kink will follow its normal weekly update schedule.) I can’t argue with someone who says that the price is too high right now, but I can add this: if you like this kind of material, you will not find better on the ‘net. If you have only a passing interest in this, then the value may not be there. If, like me, you have an interest in this, the value is there even with only nine videos right now.
Overall this is an excellent site that will undoubtedly get larger over time.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Newer videos 720x480, many older ones 640x480.
-Nice archive, presently 117 video shoots.
-Many natural, attractive girls who seem to really enjoy flashing. Most of them are very enthusiastic.
-Attractive price through the link from TBP.
-Member forum. Provides news about future updates and you can post suggestions and comments.
Cons:
-Many videos do not have photo shoots and many photo shoots do not have videos.
-Videos do not have a link to download the entire video at once. In the member forum the webmaster recently promised to add a link.
-Updates may take as long as two weeks for an entire shoot. Updates a few clips at a time.
-Photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file. Many photos poor quality. Apparantly not adding new photo shoots.
-May not be all exclusive as the main photographer has videos on other flashing websites.
-Bonus sites streaming only with poor quality videos.
Bottom Line:
Most of the videos were a lot of fun and better than I expected. I counted three with oral sex and a few with a little masturbation, so not only skin. A lot of the videos were quite explicit. A variety of races and ethnicities as well as body types, although most were thin. Most appear to be amateurs, although the shoot of Hannah Hilton was good. I would definitely sign up again in a few months.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Is Part Of a Huge Network access (19 + websites).
Few Bonus Feed Areas Too.
Several download formats for videos.
Navigation Good But Average.
Downloading was average 400k per file 220 up to 5
Items seen only here.
No Banwidth Limit same as Network
No DRM videos protection.
Very Attrative Looking Site.
Hot Girls, very playful.
Cons:
Site is Severely Repetitive Niche'
Average Download Speed ( could be slightly better)
At Times Camera Shakes
Navigation and site the same as network.
About 50 Videos So Far.
Bottom Line:
Ok This site is another well produced Brazzer Network Quality site,
However I am being tougher on the bigger sites now days since they rake in the cash to do a excellent job not just a good one.
The site really doesnt meet the overall network feel. While I agree it's new. Talk in the forum shows that the Network is even considering dropping that extra site.
Heres MHO, a girl goes out in the city etc, is sexxy playful and teases guys and gives random sex and BJ TJ's around town.
Ok now once youve done that in the park, in and alley, and at a store etc, youve pretty much covered the jist of the site. The fantasy doesnt hit the same mark as the other sites in the network.
What makes the site hard to watch is at times Camer Shakes, feels like and episode of Cops.
While its part of the mistique here, its just to much to watch. And street shooting is very hard to pull off and stay at the top of your game.
Bottom Line, its a fun site its hard-core and playful. But it rough around the edges, and repetitive for my liking. Video HD is remarkable though given this is done outside so that a huge plus. "awsome" Downloads were average 400k on the west coast at most times on my 5mb conection.
ToadMix's Take: Join for the network, not the site its self. Its a good site, true its new, I do not see time changing much. Would be better spent finding a new Nich'.
Oh Say perhaps. Make a solo section that Brazzers doesnt have anywhere That would really complete this network.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Orgies with plots: the wedding reception, the recording deal celebration, ladies night out, etc.
Refreshing after viewing the gonzo-style of US porn.
One of the few sites offering orgy scenes shot outdoors. I'd guess about one fourth of their scenes are outdoors, a strong preference of mine.
Cons:
The same 12 or 13 guys appear...now I'm watching for the women, but they still need to flesh out their male ranks.
All hardcore is by adult stars: visit the companion site 'PartyHardCore' to see (mostly) amatuers swapping body fluids.
Bottom Line:
No longer modestly priced now that the dollar is worth peanuts compared to the euro. Some of its sister sites, 'Fully Clothed Pissing' & "Pissing in Action' should not be watched directly after a full meal.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of nice voyeur videos from (russian?) beaches
- Navigation is ok and easy to check
- Trial available
- multi filetype support
- some videos are high definition
Cons:
- some videos are realy bad quality or wiggly
- increased amount of FAKE voyeur videos found in last months
- most "video episodes" are discontiguous :(
- very rare closeups scenes
Bottom Line:
if you like couples or naked women and men on beaches doing nasty things you will love beachhunters!
The amount of videos (seperated in several categories like "sex on the beach" or "topless") is huge and there are even HD videos available.
Good is that there are several oppotunities of downloading the files in different filesizes and formats.
Not so good is that there are no or very rare closeups videos or scenes :(
Even if the most beachhunters videos are REAL i have noticed that they upload a non irrelevant amount of FAKE VIDEOS that are staged and NOT real voyeur! Thats why i have to diminish my rating from 80 to 77.
In general beachhunters is absolutely worth a look for everyone who is in voyeur videos!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Girls are daring in public
Part of Brazzers network which gives full access
$10 per month retention discount
Exclusive
Extremely large picture sets
Great download speeds
Very nice navigation and search ability
Multiply download options
ZIPS!
Cons:
Pictures need to be larger
Videos need to be clearer
Needs to grow, but it is young
Must relogin a lot
A few of the models for this site are not as attractive
Bottom Line:
Site was launch on the network December 6th and has update weekly since then. They now have a total of 27 videos for this section as of March 29.
The videos here a fairly large, many are 750 MB and several around 1 GB. They allow downloading in chunks or the whole thing at once. They offer WMV, MPEG1, MPEG4, and IPOD/PSP for video downloads. The resolutions are 620x480 on the videos and they do not look bad at all. They could of course be better, but that could be said for most sites!
The photos sets are HUGE, we are talking over 2000 pictures in some of them! There is sure to be a few in there that you will like. Unfortunately the picture size is less impressive at 900x675 they are not large enough to do the job. I would think I big boob network would be the first to understand the importance of size!
A few of the models here do not live up to par with the other sites on the network though. A few are less pretty and have smaller boobs, but this is only a few.
Navigation is nice here, other than having to relogin a lot. Site was redisgned!
Downloading everything from this site would not take a whole month with a reasonable internet connection, However, if you want the rest of the network you better get a 750 GB hard drive for it because the network is approaching that size!
This site is worth every penny of the price especially with full network access. Just dont bother with the trial because it does not work. Join this outright, you will not regret it!
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Network access (19+ websites).
- Multiple download formats for videos.
- ZIP download option available for photosets and vidcaps.
- Cool website design.
- Navigation is very easy.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Exclusive content.
- No download limit.
- No DRM videos protection.
- Regular updates.
- Bonus feeds (streaming websites,live cams).
- Very helpful customer support.
- Members forum.
- Site has it's own personality.
Cons:
- Needs growth.
- Few annoying adds in members area.
- Photosets size could be larger.
- Videos quality could be even better.
- Updates could come faster.
Bottom Line:
Asses In Public is a very good reality website that it has it's own personality but surely needs growth.
First of all, when you join you will have full access to Brazzers Network and that means that you will gain access to 19 adult websites, so surely there is lots of variety waiting.
Website's design is very good and navigation is easy especially with new Brazzers network's search features. Members can easily find their favourite pornstar's scenes by using this cool new search feature.
Videos can be downloaded in multiple formats (.wmv, .mpeg1, .mpeg4, iPod/PSP) in parts or as full scenes. You can even stream them online if you don't want to download them. Videos quality is very good but could be even better. ZIP option for photosets and vidcaps is available in here as well making downloading simple and easy. Their sizes could be larger at my opinion but that doesn't mean that their quality isn't good.
There is no download limit or DRM videos protection and downloading was fast for me (most hours of day). Content is exclusive and dated and site updates once per week. As site's collection is tiny at the moment (24 scenes) I think that updates could come faster.
There are some bonus feeds for members and a cool members forum. Girls and scenes rating system is a nice feature as well. Customers support is very helpful and quick in responses. Sadly, there are a few annoying adds in members area.
This site has it's own personality and surely worths it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of Video Content
Very Easy Navigation
Updated Often with Lots of Content
Cheap and Long Trial Period
Newer Videos are High Quality
Decent Download Speeds
Pictures are Zip
You can Download different video formats(avi, mp4, wmv)
No DRM
Cons:
Video Editing is Horrible Video Clips are Redundant
Older Pictures are Screen Captures (poor quality)
Some Videos are Set-Up (fake)
Videos can be Too Short
Some "HD" videos aren't really HD
Very few pussy close-up videos/pics
Bottom Line:
If you are into casual public nudity and public sex then this site offers the most content for the price. There are about 110 pages of video clips with about 40 videos per page and 80 pages of pictures/screen captures, also with 40 sets per page.
You can download the videos in 3 different formats (avi, wmv, mp4) or stream them (except for HD videos). The pictures are available in zip files and sorted by date. In all there is a lot of content here, especially for first time subscribers.
The downfall, however, comes with how the content is presented. In some cases you get 15-30 seconds of a particular woman, and then in other videos (mostly the sex on the beach kind) you get 10-20 minuets. Also, a decent amount of the updates are continuations of previous scenes. There is one couple on here that appears in about 20% of the sex videos. They obviously swing a lot, but man how many times can you show them!
Also, the editing of the clips is horrible. You may get 5-7 seconds of one woman and then it cuts to another woman and then back to the first woman. It is annoying if you like one of them and not the other. Finally, some of the videos are fake (i.e. fake public sex or fake changing rooms). This takes away from the other "voyeur" content that is real and many of the members post complaints on the forums about this.
But when taken as a whole this is probably the best nude beach site on the net I have found. It just needs variety of content and better presentation.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Another of the sites in the Orgy Max network, of fetish sites.
- Movies are 640 on high end and 1400+ speed
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped
- Very believable content, true amateur feel to it
- Getting better speeds on this one than the others, almost 1400 kb/s on a 10 M connection
Cons:
- Hey, I saw that guy on the other sites! Same men from their other sites are on this one too.
- Price is a major issue with this network and even as standalone sites, this is a cheaper one by itself, but it will still set you back 30+ in dollars
- Sets are very similar, kind of a "Seen one, seen them all" feel.
- Have no idea what they are saying, not even for sure what language they are speaking. I speak and understand English, Spanish, Portugese and Italian, but have no clue on here!
Bottom Line:
I had forgot to review this network and its sites, so I will do this one too since it is one of the more popular sites in the network.
The basis, bunch of guys go to a college party or just a party with nothing but women. Give them women beer until they get naked and have a big orgy. Sounds just like college in the USA! We've been doing this stuff for years here.
One thing I want to add here is that I do like that the men in these videos do not push these women around or try to force them to swallow. They hug the women after having sex with them. They seem to be very geniune and fun-loving men, though I would think so, getting sex from 5 college women per night will make you fun-loving.
This one is a little more organized than Party Hardcore, but I'm now wondering if that is a good thing. This site's sex seems very planned. The girls though do look like that it up to them whether they have sex or not. Some of the sex is very mechanical, which I think is with the paid women. Other parts is very wild. You will see this plain average girl suddenly jump on one of the guys and give him the riding of the century! Which is where the believability of the site comes into play.
Still, unless you love a good drunk room full of girls, I can't recommend it for the price. You actually get pissed at the guys in it for not picking the one really hot woman you notice. It is probably no different than any other orgy site, except the high price. Good content, but not this high.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Some very attractive European Girls which is always a plus with me and in orgies and look to be having a fun time indeed.
Cons:
Right here we go, very frustrating site indeed, the girls seem to keep their clothes on a lot and just move their panties to a side, why I'll never know, very strange practice and just makes the vids a little boring , I want to see a room full of naked girls getting fu**ed, but just not as good when you hardly see much pussy. Its very obsessed with blow jobs which certainly isn't what I want to see.
Bottom Line:
The idea for the site is fantastic, love seeing loads of girls together and wish there was loads of orgy sites on the net, sadly there isn't, so this concept is great. Just needs to get the girls completly naked and have more all girl parties with loads of great sex we can see.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Flashing looks to be 100% real and in locations that I have seen in person.
- Some of the girls are really cute, some are pretty, some are average.
- Models walk up to strangers and talk to them while flashing.
- Everything is average quality or better, pics and vids
Cons:
- There really isn't a whole lot to see on here
- Extreme softcore, very little touching, just quick flash, stop, start over.
- Person videoing talks through the whole thing
- 3rd party content wasn't interesting either
Bottom Line:
I've always been intrigued by exhibitionism and voyeurism, and had saw some samples from this site. I was expecting much more. The samples I saw were the most hardcore parts of the site, and those were even tame. I only downloaded maybe 4 of the girls' videos and pictures, but have never went back to them since downloading them. I would rate it lower, but it does say public flash, not public sex or public masturbation. It just left a lot to be desired for me. If they added maybe 1-2 more clips furthering the tease, then it would rate higher.
My best way to describe my feelings towards the site would be to say I feel like I was in a gym with nothing but women and I walked into the dressing room only to get the door slammed in my face at the last minute!
Definitely need more content and more skin for me and more touching. To put it plainly, it is a very vanilla site. Not recommended if you are wanting more than just basic flashing.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
