Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Public Disgrace

Public Disgrace (0)

rearadmiral (388) 04-06-10  01:29pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Kink.com is among the best (if not the best) BDSM provider on the internet
- Very user-friendly Ė easy to navigate and download
- Part of a larger network of BDSM sites
- All exclusive videos
- A mix of settings (some outdoors in Europe and some inside at Kinkís Armories
- Excellent value for the monthly fee
- Very unique content. Iím not aware of any other content quite like this on the web
- Discount access to other sites on the network
- Excellent customer service
- Regular updates
Cons: None. I mean that. In my last review of this site it was just new and didnít have a lot of scenes up. Now there are in excess of 90 with more being added regularly.
Bottom Line: Itís certainly no secret to anyone who has read any of my other reviews of sites on the Kink.com network, but Iím a huge fan of this company. Obviously itís essential that Iím a fan of BDSM too, and for anyone who is, Kink.com offers the best BDSM sites available.

When I last reviewed Public Disgrace it was a relatively new site to the network that catered to a very unique niche: BDSM and BDSM-related activities outdoors and indoors in public settings. As the site has grown it has continued to serve this niche and serve it very well.

The niche, as you can tell from past reviews, puts a woman in a BDSM situation, with various forms of bondage and discipline, and brings her into public. In my opinion, the site can be divided into two broad but distinct categories: public outdoor with real public looking on, and public but in a controlled environment. The site is relatively equally divided between these two sub-niches.

The public outdoor scenes are very unique. They are shot in Europe, where the religious right obviously hold little influence. A woman in some form of bondage may be made to walk in a public square with her arms bound and her skirt around her ankles. Or perhaps on a bus. Sex is often included, but not normally right out in public, though it is outdoors and the public is nearby. These scenes are very unique and very interesting, though sometimes I can feel a little uncomfortable for the public who happen by.

The second broad sub-niche are scenes filmed in some setting like a bookstore, a bar or a hardware store. These seem to be a bit more staged than the real public ones, and part of that feeling comes from the ability to control access. The result is that there is usually more sex involved. This sub-niche also includes scenes shot at the Kink.com Armories in San Francisco. These scenes are more like a BDSM gangbang. Both of these types of scenes are very well done and are also interesting.

On the technical side, the site offers video in various formats and scenes that are downloadable in segments or as a whole. There are pictures, and zips are available.

For a site with this amount of very unique photos and videos, the price offers excellent value. Once youíre a member of any of the Kink.com sites you can get discounted access to the others. While some sites, like Society SM and their related sites, now offer five sites with one membership, I canít fault Kink.com for not doing this. The sites within Kink.com are all unique and are easily able to stand on their own.

Public disgrace is an amazing site offered by a company that obviously cares about its product and customers. I highly recommend taking a membership.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (14)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


mbaya (366) I was a member a while back when they had a lot less content. I have never rated a site as a 99, but for this one I can see why you would. I agree that is a fair rating for a truly great site.
04-06-10  08:48pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (388) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

I honestly never figured that Iíd give a 99 to anyone either, but this site deserves it. The volume of material they have, the uniqueness of it, the download speeds and the customer service all support a high rating. The fact that they produce some of the most innovative BDSM available is a big factor. The fact that it is easy to access at a fair price clinches the deal.

Iíve never gone wrong with a Kink site. Iíve had recurring memberships to several sites and have never been disappointed. There are some sites that Iíd not have any inclination to join, but I suspect that they would reflect the same high standards that Iíve seen.

04-07-10  03:54am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) Just took the tour because of your review and because the site looks really promising but noticed that all updates have seven, or six videos listed above the update. Could you please confirm that all videos are downloadable as one complete video rather than in segments? Thanks.
04-20-10  06:29pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (388) REPLY TO #3 - messmer :

Yes. All the videos have multiple download options for format and size. These are mp4 HD, mp4 Ipod, wmv and wmv HD. Within each of those options there are usually five or six clips but above the clips there is an option to "download full movie." I can confirm that this option exists throughout the site and that it is the full movie.
04-21-10  02:09pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - rearadmiral :

Thank you, rearadmiral! I'm about to join a Kink.com site for the first time! :-)
04-21-10  06:08pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (388) REPLY TO #5 - messmer :

Please let everyone know what you think. I'm a big fan and I hope that it meets your expectations too.
04-21-10  06:45pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #6 - rearadmiral :

You've come to the right person, rearadmiral, I can't help but let everyone know what I think! Give me a few days to look things over. :-)
04-22-10  02:29pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (388) REPLY TO #7 - messmer :

I only hope that the site lives up to the praise that I've heaped on it! This (and many other Kink sites) are among the most innovative and well done sites on the internet, provided that you're into BDSM.
04-22-10  05:00pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #8 - rearadmiral :

Just a quick inquiry. Do you have any difficulties today getting into and navigate within the site itself? The individual pages seem to take eons to load. Downloads are quite fast and so far I am happy with the quality of the material I've downloaded but logging in and moving within the site are horrible for me while the other sites I subscribe to are moving along at their usual fast speed.
04-22-10  06:29pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (388) REPLY TO #9 - messmer :

I'm a day later than when you posted this message, but I check just now and I have no problem with the site loading quickly. I've never experienced that problem. Maybe it was a server issue or upgrade or something. Are you still experiencing it?
04-23-10  04:12am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #10 - rearadmiral :

All's well, rearadmiral. I got in very quickly just a few minutes ago, and moving around within the site was a breeze, and I can tell you already from having watched one full episode last night that this site indeed deserved your praise. Technically and otherwise the scenes are very well done.

I only have one small personal complaint: I wish they would do away with the initial interview with the model before the action starts, I feel this takes away from the fantasy. The interview upon conclusion is fine because it gives you the assurance that everything shown was consensual.

04-23-10  08:53am

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (388) REPLY TO #11 - messmer :

messmer - I'm glad the site stands up to the praise and high marks I gave it. I wondered if I was just blinded by personal preference, but with you liking it too that makes my opinion a bit more objective.

I agree with you on the interview thing. The closing interview is probably sufficient. But given that Kink is really pushing some limits I suspect that they want (or have been told by their lawyer) to make everyone 100% certain that this is all consenual. Maybe if Max Hardcore had done something similar he wouldn't be a guest of the State in a prison now. Not that I think what Max did and what Kink does are really comparable... Max really tried, and usually succeeded in being degrading. With Kink, it's all part of the consenual fun.

04-23-10  01:06pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #12 - rearadmiral :

Yes, that's what I really like about this site, that, despite its BDSM theme the obvious willingness of the models to test their limits (or to give in to their natural inclinations) puts them in control, even though they may play (or be) submissives. Kink is far removed from Max Hardcore in that respect.
04-23-10  01:43pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (388) REPLY TO #13 - messmer :

That's also a clear theme that runs through the other Kink sites that I've had memberships in. Kink has really mastered the 'illusion' of extreme BDSM while still making it clear that the model not only consents but is also having a lot of fun. I like that about Kink.
04-24-10  05:34am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.