Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- email alerts for when your favorite star/site updates
- Includes access to over 34 sites each with its own focus
- 50 "channels" with limited access to other sites' content. I've had good luck finding new sites to join based on these samplings.
- Over 500 videos each video about an hour long.
- Videos 1280X720 approx 5 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour
- great production value. As part of the kink.com family, there's never a time when you don't see good action. Camera work and direction are tip-top
- Allows download managers
- Casting seems to be top line professional. But if you look in the background (and sometime in the main shoot) there are what I assume to be local members of the kink community. I find that very hot
- Billing by rocketpay
- scenes are rated and you can heart them. I like this because I can then mark the ones I've already viewed/downloaded.
- tags help you find more of what you like
Cons:
- pix available as .zip files
- Some of my favorites (and it was hard to pick) were:Lauren Philips (they say redheads can handle more pain - she seems to be an example!), Aidan Starr is one of the main doms and she is hot as hell, Dee Williams (I love the MILFs), Penny Pax (red head and MILF). In short the talent is always good and the scenes are always hot. It's unusual to find a bad shoot)
CONS:
- zips are available for pix but they are small sets. Typically less than 50
- download limit but it doesn't say what it is
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- Expensive (but high quality)
- Occasionally I feel like the camera is panning too much - but I'm really being nit-picky here.
- Last update was June 2020 I'm willing to bet that's covid related. To pull a shoot like these off with Covid protocols must be a mess. I'm sure this site will be back in time
Bottom Line:
I love this site. Shooting gangbangs is really hard (well or so I imagine anyway). This site and the ameature CathyCreampie.com I think do it the best of anyone. I seldom feel like I'm missing out on good action when the camera moves on.
I don't think there's a better BDSM site than kink.com and I think the upper floor is one of the top 5 sites on the network.
Action centers on a sub or two need to be challenged and prove herself. It's always hot seeing the dynamic play out. There's normally side activities that can just have hot as the main attraction
I thought about throwing down a 100 because when it comes to gangbang BDSM I think no one does it better (even with the competition within the network I think this site does it best because they make it hot without making it over the line - for me - a very subjective call to be sure.)
In the end, I decided that the lack of new updates and the historic inconsistent updates kept them from a top score. But the whole kink team should be proud of this site. It is truly top-notch.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Premier kink content. Scenes are very heavy on BDSM - lots of spanking. There's a good mix of partner action and multiple partners. Most scenes have a interesting set up everything from revenge to naughty maids.
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Updates once/week
- Close to 700 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top fetish models. If she's a big name she's probably worked here. There's also more diversity of ethnicity/body type/pregnant etc. than any other network I can think of.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
Cons:
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- Shoot have some stills that you can preview before loaded the video - but no downloads.
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- photo zips have been added back - but when I was last a member they didn't reapply that for the whole back catalog
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here
-That quality comes at the cost of large files. This can be a little frustrating because each video contains an approximate 10 minute post interview were the model explains the good time she had
Bottom Line:
***April 22, 2017***** After reviewing some wise comments from the community I decide to back away from the 100 point score I previously entered. I hate the notion that "you can't score a 100", but they are correct this is not the site to exemplify that notion. THANK YOU for taking the time to critique me.
I know some people will challenge my rating of 100. Please read this before killing me in the comments. I rate a site based on what it reports to be. And S & S does exactly what it says. They deliver hardcore kinky BDSM content with flawless production values. You can see and hear all the action. The camera doesn't jerk around wildly and there are interesting "plots". I could knock them down to a 98 or 99 because "no one is perfect" but to me it's not about an arbitrary measure of perfect; it's how close did you come to delivering what you promised. Sex and Submission hits the mark.
Kink is a huge player and I view Sex and Submission as their flag ship site. It is one of the more frequently updates; gets the bigger talent, and has the broadest appeal. That said: Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here.
Although it is pricy I think everyone should check out kink.com; and S&S in particular. They allow 5 previews a day and the previews give a good taste of what's inside. Along with Brazzers, Reality Kings,and Naughty AmericaI I view kink.com as something you owe it to yourself to at least get a months membership once.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Premier kink content. Scenes are very heavy on BDSM - lots of spanking, whippings, gags, and discipline. Most scenes have an interesting setup with why the
- Includes access to 24 sites each with its own focus
- Updates once/2 weeks (approximately)
- Over 550 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top fetish models. If she's a big name she's probably worked here. There's also more diversity of ethnicity/body type/etc. than any other network, I can think of.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- pix available as .zip files
Cons:
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site has had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- Rather pricey - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here
-That quality comes at the cost of large files. This can be a little frustrating because each video contains an approximate 10-minute post-interview in which the model explains the good time she ha
Bottom Line:
The theme of most shoots a "slave" is trained. The earlier shoots typically show several "days" of training with new skills being developed each day.
I give this site a solid buy. The action is hot. There's a lot of it. Updates keep coming. There's plenty of variety. I think kink should keep this site going.
I enjoyed this site a lot - in fact, it's one of my favorites in the network. Like the rest of kink it's not for the faint of heart. There's lots of electricity play, fisting, gagging, anal, and "impact play". That said there is a pre and post interview to make clear that everyone enjoyed themselves during the shoot. I especially like the fact that top talent will shoot for kink. The scenes with Riley Nixon, Holly Micheals, Lyla Storm, and Allie James were particularly good
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ The sister site of the almost as impressive Slave Mouth.
+ As good of unscripted porn as I have seen.
+ Leans heavily on dom/sub scenes.
+ One of the few sites I download each video from.
+ Scenes are filmed outdoors.
+ Attractive subs and believable.
Cons:
- I could see a site like this being grouped with every other BDSM site, but definitely should not be.
- It is a small site in quantity but the quality makes up for me.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed Slave Mouth several months ago and was blown-away by the authenticity and realness of the content. I decided to try Dom The Nation and I am happy to say, I like it even better. The obvious reason is I like the less focus on oral.
Dom the Nation looks like a tour of debauchery. I did not list it in cons because I think people know what they are getting into with a site like this one. Some of the scenes and actions might be seen as lewd and that's okay, none of the actresses seem to mind. It is one of the strongest pros of the site. The females appear as legitimate submissives looking for their dominant male. It adds an authenticity most BDSM sites lack. There is never the feeling of these women are doing these actions just for a paycheck. It feels natural and though rough and maybe lewd and rude, if it's what the woman likes and desires, I have no problem with it and even believe in celebrating it.
While BDSM and bondage content is often viewed as restraining, it's anything but to a submissive who finally finds the dom she can trust and give herself to.
The size of the site will be a downside to those used to mega networks with heavily scripted and nearly all scenes seeming identical. Slave the Nation only has 60 videos right now, but all 60 are an adventure and vert different from each other.
Every video is worth downloading or watching just to see what is going to happen. There is a freedom the subs experience that can be felt and even shared with by the viewer.
The scenes are all filmed outside. I do believe that's a bonus for the subs and incites their exhibitionist side. The video quality is excellent especially considering the outside scenery, natural light changing and even sounds.
The subs range from cute to pretty. I am not familiar with any of them from other porn sites and assume they are all amateurs. The content also delivers that feeling. These are subs finally experiencing what they have always wanted and maybe even needed. I do not know if everyone who views these scenes will have as strong of a positive feeling as I have, but I do know I feel more watching these scenes than I do watching hundreds of everyday porn. I do like Dom the Nation a little more than Slave Mouth, but give both my highest recommendation.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great orgy scenes. A lot of times I can't follow the action. Upper Floor doesn't jerk around like some other sites so you can see what's happening.
- About 550 scenes
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Lighting and sound are well done. I give them a lot of credit that especially hard when there's so much action going on.
- Lots of guy on girl and girl on girl action. Almost always multiple partners.
- zip downloads are back.
- more model diversity here than many other places. Mostly in ethnicity somewhat in body shape.
- Lots of big name talent. If you favorite porn star shoot fetish content she's probably worked for Kink - and UF in particular.
- Updates about 3 times per month
- scene length is usually over an hour I think one of the longest I saw was almost and hour and a half.
Cons:
- While I'm happy to see picture access is back. I'm still frustrated with the user interface. It is deviling to find more of what you're looking for. There are keywords available but they are both very broad and not ever shoot is tagged correctly.
- Cross sells inside the member side. It frustrating to see search results come up for another site offering for you to buy more- especially because Kink.com is not a cheap membership
- Expensive (but high quality)
- Occasionally I feel like the camera is panning too much - but I'm really being nit picky here.
Bottom Line:
The theme of most shoots a "slave" is proving herself to the community and finishing a final ordeal of submission/service. It is certainly hot. Many of my favorites were ones that deviated from this worn route.
Competition is often used - blow job, who can go without coming longer, that sort of thing. It made the site a lot more fun than it might otherwise be.
I give this site a solid buy. The action is hot. There's a lot of it. Updates keep coming. There's plenty of variety. I think kink should keep this site going.
While I have a couple of complaints they really are small. I'm unaware of any better orgy BDSM site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge collection of innovative videos
- Unique niche
- Multiple download options
- Photos available
- Beautiful models
- Hardcore sex in BDSM settings
Cons:
- Limited search function
- Organization could be improved
- File names vary and are of limited use
- No tags assigned to videos
- Some missing scenes
Bottom Line:
TTOO was the first Kink site I joined several years back and it remains my favourite. Most BDSM sites put a woman in bondage and inflict some pain. Some sites have a unique theme (Water Bondage) but the underlying premise is the same. TTOO is different: there is bondage, humiliation and pain, but the premise is the training of a submissive woman. The niche is the making of a sub, not what can be done after the sub is created.
The traditional TTOO shoots are broken down into days, with the normal training regime being conducted over four days. The intensity of the training is increased as each day passes. Bondage, humiliation, demeaning work, pain and training are all here. Sex occurs in the shoots. The sex is very well done but isn’t the main focus: it occurs as part of the training, not just for the sex itself. The end product is near four hours of some intense video per shoot with exceptional production values.
In the past couple of years TTOO has added a new kind of shoot to keep things interesting. This is still about training, but they’ll bring in multiple girls to audition to be trained. These can last from one to four days and involve much of the same kinds of training as the main scenes, but have an extra element of competition. These share the usual high production standards that Kink has. These are innovative and a welcome addition to the site.
The technical stuff is standard for all Kink sites. Each scene has its own page where the video can be streamed or downloaded. Downloads are available in either WMV or Mp4 format. Two resolutions are available for both formats. The highest resolution for both comes in at 1280x720.
Like all Kink sites, TTOO offers photos as singles and zips, but this really isn’t a photo site so I won’t go into any detail.
I’m a HUGE fan of the Kink sites and I may have been blind to some faults because of that. The faults are fairly minor but just look more serious given the overall quality of the site. I think that for a site to be exceptional it has to provide excellent porn, make that easily available to members and has to be well organized. Obviously the first element is the most important, and Kink delivers: this is incredible porn. They succeed in the member access by allowing download managers and having servers that never slow down and give some of the highest download speeds I’ve encountered. Where Kink falls down is in site organization.
To keep this succinct, here are my specific concerns:
- Limited search function – the search function is limited and doesn’t work well. The problem appears that when you search a term the only thing it searches is the scene title, not the performers. So searching for star X won’t get you a scene if the scene is titled “Rope Slut.” You can search the model index but that isn’t great either. You can locate scenes on specific Kink sites but you can’t download them from there. The solution is to take a few key words from the title and go back to the main site page and search those terms.
- File names vary and are of limited use – this is likely subjective, but the file naming convention has no standardization. If you want to have any hope of organizing the scenes into related groups you’ll need to do it as you download. One bright note is that each scene has a unique shoot number as part of the name and that can be searched. The issue is you may download “1234_Bobbi” as the Day 1 scene in Bobbi Starr’s training, and then download “1100_Bobbi_S” as Day 2. The problem is that unless you rename the files as you go, the Bobbi in day 1 might not be Bobbi Starr, and if you’re sorting your files numerically you’re apt to get Day 1 and Day 2 mixed up. In most instances, model’s last names aren’t included as part of the file. I think a file-naming standard that captured the shoot number, model’s full name and day of the shoot would work much better.
The lack of a search function and odd naming are bad enough when dealing with the traditional multi-day shoots, but organizing some of the multi-girl, multi-day shoots is a lot of work.
While this sounds like I’m being overly fussy, keep in mind that TTOO goes out of it’s way to produce multi-day shoots. These are amazing, but grouping the whole shoot together is a lot of work and their own file names make organizing the files difficult.
Other more minor concerns are the lack of tags. I’m not saying that they need tags for everything, but for narrow, specific and hard to find niches they could work. Finally, while rare, there are missing scenes. The training scenes lose continuity when a day is missing.
The bottom line is this: when you weigh the good things about TTOO against the things that need improvement there is no contest. This is compelling, unique porn with stunning models in high-quality scenes. The negatives pale in comparison. If you have even a passing interest in BDSM I’d highly recommend a membership.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. The quality of videos has improved as time goes by, camerawork is excellent in general.
2. Many beautiful ladies participating in S&M sessions with spanking, bondage, and rough (but smiling) sex.
3. Site goes out of its way with before and after shoots to show that sex was TOTALLY consentual and enjoyed by all parties.
4. Much more creative than other sites, often including more than one girl in a session, something I find much more interesting.
Cons:
1. While I enjoy the site and it does have some outdoor shots, the general dungeon, rusty factory kind of scenes get old. I'd enjoy some hot scenes in more luxurious surroundings.
Bottom Line:
I've been enjoying Sex & Submission for a long time (I think I first joined when it was pretty new a few years ago). It now has tons of content for those who enjoy spanking, bondage, and rough sex. At about $30 USD its a bargain for the quality and quantity.
The girls either really enjoy it or are great actresses, smiling and saying how they'd love to come back and do more sessions. I've been coming back periodically for a few years myself.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Many very attractive pornstars.
-Multiple scenes from Eva Angelina, Bobbi Star, and Jada Fire. Jada's best workever.
-Ethnic mix of white, black, Latina and Asian models.
--No DRM or download limits.
-Archive of 205 videos, going back to May 2005.
-Newest videos are about an hour long.
-Supports download managers with excellent download speeds. Mine was 2500kb.
-Videos available as excellent DVD quality MP4 or as WMV 1280x720,7158kbps. Older videos are lower quality.
-Videos can be streamed. Downloads come as clips, while whole videos can be zipdownloaded, and in a few cases can be downloaded as whole videos as well as in clips.
-Photosets for every video. Can be zipdownloaded. They are screenshots that are 1200x675 and very sharp.
-Exclusive material. Mostly known pornstars.
-Mostly the girls seem to be really into the action. They don't come across as acting. The site claims the girls are told not to pretend, but to have genuine reactions.
-Updates at least once a wk
Cons:
-Too many pornstar looking typical bleach blondes.
-All videos shot in the same location. A little variety would be better.
Bottom Line:
This is a light BDSM site, so it is not for everybody. This is my second membership in this site. It has gotten better and better over the last two years since I was last a member. This is the highest that I have ever rated any site, regardless of niche. There is a lot of great sex along with the BDSM, and can be VERY hot. The only site in this niche that comes even close is fuckedandbound.com, but this is much better both in the sex and in the dominance. I am much more into the sex than in the BDSM aspects and can tell you that the sex is amazing. If you like the niche, you cannot do better than to join this site. It has a very large archive of high entertainment value videos and great quality that can be compared to the best videos available on the net.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ femsub training (by both males and females, but mostly males) combined with sex
+ strong psychological element
+ Safe, Sane and Consensual BDSM
+ most models (both male and female) really love it
+ ability to leave feedback
+ ability to download whole episode as a ZIP
+ video/image quality is good
+ cameraguy work is excellent
+ setups are good
Cons:
- still less content than other kink.com sites
- training of the same girl is divided into several episodes (which is ok), but these episodes appear not one after another, which is annoying
Bottom Line:
TheTrainingOfO is quite a recent addition to kink.com sites. It is quite similar to SexAndSumbission, but also is very different. The idea is that the same guys take one girl and train her as a good slave. It takes them 4 days to do it (actually 5 with 1 day rest), which means ability to see gradual progress of the girl. Not all girls succeed in training, but most are trained well. Site has very strong psychological element in play, and it's a bit more geared towards domination/submission theme, than towards SM or sex (though there is plenty of both SM and sex too, with all kinds of sex present, including anal).
As all other kink.com sites, TheTrainingOfO is all about SSC (Safe, Sane and Consensual) BDSM, with most models being really into the scene. Chemistry is usually excellent, and overall feeling is just great.
Site is new, but at this point they've already got about 50 episodes (which is still less than other kink.com sites, but quite enough for me).
Bottom line: one of the best BDSM sites out there, with strong emphasis on psychology, a bit physics, with lots of sex added to the mix. Highly recommended (in a sense, it's "advanced version" of SexAndSubmission, at least for me).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Kink.com family of sites
- 480+ scenes
- Updates weekly
- Standard-setting production values
- Many viewing / downloading options
- Many A-list models
- Rare niche (bondage AND sex)
- Supports download managers
- Clear model consent
- Excellent value
- Photos available as singles and zips
Cons:
- None
Bottom Line:
For those who know Kink.com’s sites, Sex and Submission needs no introduction. S+S is one of their older sites and dates back nine years. All Kink’s sites focus on consensual BDSM play with each site adding a twist. Here the twist is sex. That may seem self-evident, but many of Kink’s sites don’t have a lot of actual sex and when they do it is secondary to the specific niche. Here the sex is front and center. The sex isn’t plain vanilla though, as there is always an element of D/s play and sex while in bondage or restraint. Kink.com is, in my opinion, the best BDSM company operating today.
For those unfamiliar with Kink, don’t confuse them with “Abuse” sites. Those sites seem to revel in making the model miserable. Kink is the opposite: the models get to explore this facet of their sexuality in a controlled environment and it is clearly all about their pleasure. It’s hard to explain, but this isn’t misogynistic BDSM.
As with other Kink sites, this one goes out of its way to ensure that the model fully consents to the play. There is an interview in each one where the scene is discussed and the safe word is made known. I know there are some who reject this approach and think that the consent itself is forced, but there is no evidence to support that position. One factor that, in my opinion, speaks well for Kink’s professionalism are the numbers of A-list stars who shoot scenes here, and many of them shoot multiple scenes. I suspect that if Kink coerced the models that no A-list star would work for them, let alone shoot multiple scenes. Adding to this position is the fact that many of the A-listers are definitely not fetish models.
The site currently has 480 scenes. Older scenes start with an interview and jump right into the action. Newer scenes are scenario-based which can add to the heat. There is bondage in several positions, with sex in most of them. If the model does anal, there is usually some anal. The scenes close with an interview which can be interesting to watch to see what the model liked about the shoot. The average length of the scenes is a little over an hour. The scenes can’t be said to meet usual standards in that Kink.com sets those standards. Set creation and production values are the best there are. For scenes that strive have a dark feel about them, they succeed but they don’t look actually dark. They are all well light, shot and edited.
The site updates with one new scene being added per week.
As with all Kink sites there are a lot of options to watch the scenes. (Obviously the older scenes have fewer options) There is streaming in four available resolutions. Downloads are available for portable devices, in WMV and MP4 formats. Each of those offers a choice of resolutions. I opt for the highest quality MP4s and those come in at 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. My experience with the next largest is that they are 960x540 at 1500kb/s. A few of the older scenes appear to have been remastered to a higher quality, but some haven’t. The highest resolution for some of the older scenes is 640x480 at 825 kb/s, but keep in mind that these were shot in 2005 so they were up to standard then..
Another difference exists between the oldest and newer scenes on the site. When Kink first started the scenes were relatively simple: ropes, chains, spreader bars, etc. were common implements. As Kink matured the scenes became a lot more innovative in the means to bind the models. Kink clearly has some creative minds at work. A majority of the scenes are innovative and very interesting.
Photos are available, though this is really a video site so those are secondary. I don’t collect those so I have no information on them.
Download managers work for queuing scenes. I found the links timed out at about an hour, which is reasonable.
Kink.com isn’t a network so each site requires a membership. The good news is that when you’re a member to one site you get a discounted price for the others. I usually take advantage of this by joining the cheapest site I want at the full price and then get the discounted price on the others. I’m on their mailing list but haven’t seen an offer in several years.
The bottom line on this site is simple: if you have any interest in this niche you should seriously consider joining. For the price, you get access to almost 500 scenes, regular updates and many big-name porn stars doing some interesting fetish work for the best company in the BDSM business. The scenes look great, the bondage gear is innovative and the models really seem to enjoy the play. This is an excellent value and I highly recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Almost 350 scenes to date. The site has been running since 2007
-Very high quality company in general, they seem to be the good guys in porn if you can look past that one non voluntary bruising of a model case that was reported a while back
-Armory in San Francisco proveides for a great site to shoot this kind of material
-Very high production and innovative bdsm ideas
-Great selection and variety of models
-Good amount of hardcore sex included
-Makes a creative mix of the different niches on various Kink sites
Cons:
-Scenes are sort of splitted into "days". That means you get usually 3-4 updates from the same model in similar settings. However the are full length each so this might turn out to be pro when you particularly like the model in question
-Humiliating, slave training, doing chores and so on might not be to everyones tastes even if they are generally into bdsm niche. Often a bit too non sexual in my opinion
-Always the same with Kink: No kind of network subscription or ability to mix between sites available
-Dedicated photo sessions would be nice touch but obviously they'd require lot of extra effort
-On the pricier side when it comes to cost per update
Bottom Line:
The Training of O is a themed site on Kink.com network that focuses on slave training. The material is divided into "training days" of each individual slave trainee where they are tested for different skills like pain tolerance, anal
sex, cleaning the toilet and what not. Usually there is up to four days of each slave's training. Occassionally they throw in an auditioning scene where they are selecting candidates fo their training that are made to look like slave market of some sort. In the end of the training they might be presented to the master of the Armory in their "Upper Floor" setting.
There is lot of role playing and acting involved. Scenes or days may start with the slave waking up with some kind of diary writing, instruction or grade giving and such activity that is nice touch for those who really can get into make believe. Personally I'm more int the actual sex in this scenes so there is quite much overhead in these videos.
When you look past the make believe, you'll find that this site is quite nice mix of much of the non gay niches found on this network in general. There are scenes that look like Hogtied or Device Bondage with some Sex And Submission thrown in. The only difference is that especially lately the penetrating male performer tends to be a gimp kind of guy, usually in bondage himself too and wearing some full body latex suit. Lots of whipping, caning, forced bj's too. Fetishwear, stocks, wooden boxes over the girls's heads, you name it, they probably got it.
The site and it's functionality really doesn't need another round of praise from me. It all works flawlessly and smoothly with download speeds exceeding what most can get through their broadbands. DL managers work fine. Photos are zipped but as with other sites here, the photos are more like a side product taken during shooting video. The sites are not really cheap if you consider the once a week update rate but you can always sign in and wait for a 19,99$ rebate. Higly recommendable site, especially for the variety.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ A very good BDSM site which currently includes two bonus sites
+ Varied female bodies and looks
+ It’s quite hardcore if that is your cup of tea
+ Excellent use of story and even solid acting to enhance the scenes
+ Updates each week
+ Good use of genders in the scenes
Cons:
- It’s a fact with any BDSM site, the scenes if fitting the genre, will be repetitive
- Download limit though I cannot confirm and have not hit
Bottom Line:
BDSM is a gem in the porn industry. It’s often presented as a bondage precursor and our minds even see bondage, whips and other contraptions when thinking about BDSM. We just are not fully aware of BDSM when we think that way. Regular porn scenes, cookie cutter even, employ BDSM with typical gender roles of the male being dominant and the female being submissive. We just do not think about that being BDSM.
Damsels in Peril pushes the genre forward by having damsels in peril, but not just to men. Some scenes have one woman dominating another. This at least breaks the monotony of men dominating women. The flip side of that is the basic beliefs in BDSM and domination/submissiveness come from age old beliefs in human nature.
Where porn usually strays in BDSM is in humiliation and degradation. A dominant being does not want to hurt their subservient submissive. It’s just to a viewer, the need of physical visualization is often required to see the dominance. Damsels in Peril is one of the better sites at not needing extreme degradation or humiliation.
Scenes are often including bondage ties on wrists and feet, some gags, but the action shows more enjoyment and arousal than degradation and humiliation. It’s one of the hardest parts of viewing porn based on a concept. The director and producer has to figure out a way to convey the “weakness” of one and the “strength” of the other.
As a good example of this, if you ever watch pegging porn where a woman wears a strap-on and uses it on a man, that is a very easy to see form of who is dominant and who is submissive, but maybe it’s not that simple. What if the woman doesn’t want to wear a strap-on and the man loves being pegged while getting a handjob?
Damsels in Peril fixes that – for the most part. Their models are highly effective actors and the scripts or actions if not scripted, come across as authentic.
I mentioned the con for the download limit. I have seen it listed as 6GB per day. I have not tried to download that much and would rather not hit it anyway. I usually download a few scenes each day and try to give every scene a fair chance to earn a spot in my collection. That is one of the strengths of BDSM porn. What may not look like a great scene based on the preview could be the best BDSM scene you have seen in a long time. The chemistry between the actors and as important, with the producer and director, is what makes a great BDSM scene.
Better known sites have tried the formula, like Pure Taboo and Deeper, but the viewer’s level of interest in the BDSM aspects are the only way to know if the scene is good or not. My interest heavily revolves around the actors and producers seemingly being on the same page. I want to walk away from watching a BDSM scene thinking the dominant one has to be satisfied with the result and the submissive has to be satisfied with the result.
Damsels in Peril is an excellent site all by itself and stands on its own, but currently they are providing access to F-F-Fights and FemmeFight, neither are sites I would normally join, making them both very good additions to Damsels in Peril.
Because I am not convinced of the importance of the types of models in BDSM porn, it is worth mentioning – the models, in the scenes I have watched are excellent in this type of porn and seem to be genuine to their role (dominant or submissive). It takes quite a few parts to come together to make a good BDSM scene and these are some of the best I have seen!
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
For the spanking niche this is a great (and greatly improved)site. Almost since the internet was first available I have been a member off & on, but not so often in the last several years.
It has lots of what I like when I feel like watching real spanking: red asses, pretty girls, and (sometimes) tears. I am also partial to spanking girls clothed in blue jeans and there seems more of it here now than ever before.
It has greatly improved in having far less verbal nonsense ("shame on you, you will have to be spanked"). I, personally see spanking as a sexy part of pain/pleasure and don't care for the false notion of it as punishment, especially when the spanker talks way too much (as is found a lot at Firm Hand Spanking).
They have put in wonderful new features since I was here last including model indexes, a favorites (scenes & models) section and an updates calendar going back to 2001. The calendar links with the videos & pictures, making finding things more interesting.
Cons:
Limited to punishment spanking only with a variety of implements.
I find little sexual material here. A girl might seem to be masturbating (horrors!), but it is not hard-core.
Bottom Line:
I was delightfully surprised by the great improvements in quality on this site at a very reasonable price (about $22/mo).
Definitely a wonderful site for those who find the sexy red asses of pretty girls being spanked a turn-on.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Creative, innovative site
- Beautiful models
- Extreme BDSM
- Outdoor settings
- 25 scenes and growing
- Updates with at least one scene per month
- â€Clips’ and photos too
- Downloads and streaming
- Multiple resolutions for downloads
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Slower than average download speeds
- 4K files cost extra
Bottom Line:
Dom the Nation (DtN) is a relatively new site by the creative minds behind Assylum and Slave Mouth. If you aren’t familiar with either of those older sites, I recommend checking them out and reading the reviews. Those sites are two of the most unique and creative BDSM sites I’ve ever seen. In terms of creativity, I’ve not seen anyone else come close. DtN is every bit as good as it’s sister sites but adds creativity.
What differentiates DtN is the setting for the scenes. Where both Assylum and Slave Mouth are shot indoors, DtN scenes are shot outdoors. Some of the elements that the two original sites are known for, namely bondage, extreme S&M, rough anal sex (there is no vaginal penetration here at all), face-fucking, watersports, degradation, humiliation and general depravity are all present here, but in outdoor settings. For me, shooting scenes outdoors adds a whole new element to these already-unique scenes. It adds an element of risk that, for me, heightens the allure.
Instead of using creative devices to bind and restrain the models, in most instances they are bound on bare ground including dirt, gravel and even jagged rocks. Sometimes softer surfaces such as grass are used.
Most of the scenes have been shot in the US though the crew recently did go to Italy and some of the scenes shot there are now making their way onto the site. Unlike the sister site, there is no unifying premise here. Here, it simply bondage and sadism for the sake of that alone. The site labels itself as having BDSM “documentaries” and that is an apt description.
This site began in earnest in early 2020, just before the pandemic hit. Lockdowns hindered site growth but they are back to shooting and uploading. There are currently 25 scenes uploaded. Here, a scene is called a movie and tends to be 40 minutes on average. There are also currently eight “clips.” These are shorter, more focused videos where there may just be oral sex or some specific act or bondage. Blended in among all of these are seven photo sets.
The site has made the unusual decision to not have any means to separate the videos, clips or photos. There are simply six thumbnails per screen and a description below that outlines what the file is. I suspect that not being able to filter for just videos, for example, is a creative choice because it is obvious that the site is trying to create a flow. While there isn’t necessarily a story behind these videos and clips, they do tend to flow together. And, even if you don’t want to view the photos, they are very easily skipped over.
The models who appear on the site are generally mainstream, though models who also are known for some extreme acts. Models such as Charlotte Sartre, Lydia Black and Rebel Rhyder all have scenes here. But there are also models that I don’t normally associate with BDSM who have scenes here. Those would include Rory Knox, Brooke Johnson and Claire Roos. Regardless of the model, they all give over-the-top BDSM performances. Many of the scenes feature multiple models in the same shoot. In some cases, all of the models are being subjected to BDSM and in other cases one of the subs is assisting the Dom.
For the basic subscription price you get access to stream or download files at 480p, 720p, and 1080p. 4K videos are available but require a premium membership. A note if you are streaming: the scenes default to the trailer so make sure to select the full scene.
An ongoing minor complaint that I have had with the two older sister-sites is that download speeds are much slower than I’m used to seeing on other sites. Unfortunately, that continues here. I suspect that since all these sites are related that they are all run off the same servers. This is simply a minor concern, however, because while the speeds are slower, I’ve never had a problem with the downloads timing out or crashing.
One other minor negative for me, though it may not be an issue for everyone, is that many of the scenes are shot over several hours and some extend into the night. While the lighting can make up for some of that, my preference would be for scenes shot entirely in the daylight.
DtN is certainly not a site for the faint of heart. Make no mistake, this is not a playful, vanilla BDSM site. This is a site where the BDSM is degrading and, in many cases, likely quite painful. If, however, you like what Assylum or Slave Mouth offers, then I strongly encourage you to look at DtN. Moving the scenes into a less controlled outdoor environment really adds an illicit element to them. If you do like extreme BDSM, you owe it to yourself to take a look at the trailers here. But, as with my conclusions regarding the sister-sites, DtN is class-leading but most definitely not mainstream porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Close to 400 scenes with video and photoset all the way from 2005 to this day
-Weekly update with a long scene
-720p HD from 2006 already. Most of the scenes are 720p
-These guys are the pioneers of sex in bondage kind of material. There is lots of variation and little bit for everyone as long as you like the subject
-Active community on site with forums and commenting
-Well known models as well as total amateurs
-Good download speeds, works well with DL manager, no timeout on login that I've noticed. Technical side works
-Kink.com membership is not tied to any subscription. You can stay and subscribe what and when you feel like it waiting for possible special price offers
Cons:
-Site could use some work. No relevant search or any kind of tagging to find scenes, instead of preview page you are thrown into streaming video when you click on a scene etc.
-Strongly subjective but I prefer European models which this site doesn't feature that often. I'd also prefer even more hardware and less ropes
-Acting too much (I guess it is acting). Screaming, shouting, stupid dirty talk about masters, asking for permission to cum, rolling eyes and making faces etc.
-Relatively pricey unless you wait for a discount either on Kink.com or on some other site
-Not really for photography freaks. Pictures look like non flash pics taken during action or even screenshots
-No 1080p although 720p in mp4 is very good
Bottom Line:
Without any doubt, this is the most significant sex in bondage site around with strong take on topic and no filler scenes in between. You can see the whole history of them tiptoeing around US legislation in 2005 and quite quickly starting to produce full action in bondage instead of the "catch and release" stuff they were probably forced to do for first few dozen scenes. There is probably no need telling that the site is part of the Kink.com which offers various sites in different fetish themes. However all sites must be individual subscribed to and there is no kind of network pass, only other option being buying overpriced on site currency one can use to unlock scenes.
The content of this site is simply put sex in bondage with various forms of light to semi hard SM with whips, electric prods and such, acting and role play included. There is always at least some kind of master/slave set up in place but occassionally the plots are more elaborate with scifi, medical or some other acting with props and all. The acting is the general porn quality and luckily the focus is still on the action. Sometimes I wish there was a little less of the "Yes master!" shouting as I find it awkward. These people have probably the best shooting locations and hardware for this kind of stuff available in their San Francisco Armory. Personally I think it's still a bit too rope heavy but of course they have a separate site for even more hardware bondage.
Models are the quality factor that varies a lot on this site and it too is of course all subjective. Many of them are American or big name international stars. The most glaring lack is my favorite group, East Europeans. The models aren't all that young or fit and some of them are total amateurs too which is actually cool. The strong American presence leads to lots of awkward dirty talking, shouting and screaming which I personally find a bit too much. There is one particularly frightening case called Chloe Camilla. She looks cute in photos and before the action starts but then it turns into one huge epileptic fit where she makes scary noises and rolls her eyes. Impossible to look for prolonged times.
Video quality is very good, especially if one is willing to download 720p mp4 which can end up in huge files way over three gigabytes. 1080p is a glaring omission by todays standards but I'm not sure if there'd be much to gain with it compared to already very good 720p. The only complaint is that most of the scenes are shot in quite dark conditions although lighting is good. Photo sets are available for every scene but they aren't anywhere near the offerings of sites with more focus on photography and appear to be non flash snapshots taken while filming the scene.
Technically the site itself leaves me little cold. Searching is not happening, there are no tagging on the scenes and the overall appearance is (probably intentionally) dark and minimalistic. The scene links lead directly to streaming scene so be aware of your speaker level. Personally I think they should change it to take user to the site preview.
This site is quite slow updater by today's standards. One scene per week is all you get so prolonged membership might end up not being the most attractive choice. However almost 400 past scenes is certainly a lot and probably takes up to one terabyte of HD space if downloaded at the best 720p mp4 quality so there is a lot for your money. Also once you have made a Kink.com account, you can watch for special offers to join varying sites while leaving others behind. Still I wish they had some system in place where you'd gain credits while subscribing to any of theire sites that you'd be able to buy occassional scene from another one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I won't repeat all the stats that others have done so eloquently here. So, I will keep it brief and relevant.
In terms of quality, it is excellent. The newer movies are top notch with good editing.
The women are well known but the slant on their presentation makes for a refreshing change. I have seen Trinity Post a gazillion times but not the way she is portayed on this site. The same goes for all the 'known' babes.
I like this site because it is not just focused on the S&M action but includes sex which, for me, is crucial.
The guys certainly know their thing and it always makes for a smoother experience.
Great 'feel'.
Sensible layout with multiple download options for movies and pics.
Cons:
Not much content.
Old films are grainy.
Older films are grainy and almost invisible. I believe a gnat would have a better change of ascertaining the action within.
Misleading star search. I searched for Adriana Nicole and found many links for her but the way the links were presented they lead the user to believe the star is on the sexandsubmissive site. However, you are led to another Kink.com site whereby you have to sell an organ or two to join. This form of clever external linking is a new trend that is both annoying and underhand. Spreading content by the same star across sites under the same umbrella that require further subs is not something I like.
Could do with some different scenery and situations.
Could do with some fresh faces that we have not come across.
I need more ethnic babes, more fukin' stockings and classy outfits and maybe some bush would be a refreshing change.
Bottom Line:
Refreshing and fucking sexy even if you are not into the S&M type of content, which I am not.
Great quality on the newer films and it's about time others followed suit.
Needs more content and more updates.
Needs an all-in umbrella membership so we can get all the babes under one roof. Hell, I'd pay the difference in price.
One of my favourite sites and very cleverly thought out to grab the middle market of dudes like me who like lovely babes getting a tad roughed but not bludgeoned beyond recognition.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-More than enough content for several months of subscription.
-Attractive performers all of them, no matter the body type (and they do vary) they are each attractive.
- Enthusiastic (as in real) reactions of pain and arousal from the women.
- For those than love hardcore sex in bondage scenarios, Sex and Submission delivers the perfect hybrid.
Cons:
- Some fairly well-known performers kinda takes some of the street cred from the site. Kind of replaces the whole dirty, underground feel with a mainstream vibe. (Maybe I just don't want to be seeing Steven St. Croix...)
- The "I totally didn't hate this" testimonial at the end is pretty lame, though I understand why they have it. Yeah, I'm stretching.
- Scenes do mirror each other somewhat.
Bottom Line:
The site is amazing. Great balance of video quality and download speed. The scenes are just plain hot, despite the sometimes routine approach. For those that love hardcore fucking delivered with their BDSM instead of just whipping for whipping's sake, then this is just another in a whole family of sites with memorable scenes , incredibly sexy performers, and tons of content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Site is large and accurately described - bondage etc.
Large range of activity with much deep throat and anal
Quality of videos constantly improving and up to avi (few) and wmv hd
Pictures of good quality
Interviews add sense of models as people
Some good role play scenes
Feedback pages
Cons:
As usual, virtually all models are shaved - reduces variety
Most scenes set in amorphous dungeon
Model search possible, but only off the screen featuring photo/videoset
Old videos 340x240 and RM
Bottom Line:
Good quality site focused on the BDSM niche with attractive models undergoing submission and offering all orifices!
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- maledom/femsub submission combined with sex (as site name suggests)
- most models (both male and female) really love it;
- variety; new ideas all the time
- ability to leave feedback (and sometimes even get the answer :-); also they're open to users ideas for future shoots)
- ZIPped downloads (ability to download whole episode as a ZIP)
- video/image quality is good
- cameraguy work is excellent
- setups are very good
- navigation is extremely easy and obvious
Cons:
- thrashy billing and authentication system; recurring intermittent problems with logging in
- number of models is rather limited (though models that keep appearing are very good).
Bottom Line:
One of kink.com sites (the same company that is famous for their hogtied.com and fuckingmachines.com sites); lots of models are the same with other kink.com sites, though content is unique (sharing models with other sites of similar niches can be good or bad depending on point of view).
As usual for kink.com sites, most (if not all) of the models are really into it, which (if chemistry of specific models matches) creates very strong feeling of the real Safe Sane Consensual BDSM encounter.
Site has very convenient system of member comments, which helps to create 'community feeling'; also it seems that they do read comments and take them into account.
Bottom line: Highly recommended for lovers of this specific niche (Safe, Sane and Consensual BDSM, as opposed to sites simulating rape/violence); definitely best in class.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
•Very unique – it’s more about the training than hardcore sex, though there is sex
•Fast download speeds
•It may not look like there is a lot of content, but the clips are long
•Beautiful women
Cons:
• Updates are only once a week (but since this is entirely their own product I can forgive that)
• Updates appear to be staggered (in other words they don’t upload one training day per girl in sequence – that means that if you like a particular girl you may need to hang around for a couple of months to get all her stuff)
• There is a lack of continuity in the scenes which takes away from the realism. For example, the girl might have welts on her ass that are ‘gone’ right after that.
Bottom Line:
Excellent site and promises to get better as more material is added. I’ve never seen a site quite like this. I also plan to take out memberships on other sites on the Kink network based on my positive experiences with this site.
Obviously if you have little or no interest in , or are offended by BDSM, D/s, stuff then you shouldn’t bother with a membership. If you do like this stuff I can’t imagine that there is a better site out there. The premise is pretty simple: take a willing woman and submit her to four days of training. At the end she’s a submissive slut.
I highly recommend this site if you are into this kind of kink.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. Like "Big Brother" with naked women and sex, this sight offers a live-in atmosphere of sexy women in kinky servant positions serving men and women at a variety of sex parties.
2. Seems very real with participants talking and fondling, eating, drinking, and having sex in a way that seems very random and unplanned. This is both a positive and a negative feature.
3. Includes LIVE sex parties Wednesday nights that invite (but often ignore) member comments while several party participants go about fondling, eating, and drinking.
4. Includes the excellent and user-friendly Kink.com service where a member seldom needs to enter the password and can cancel membership very easily when it comes time. Of the hundreds of sites I've belonged to in the last decade, Kink.com seems to have the very best service.
More talk and social-party atmosphere with several naked ladies serving the party-goers, with fondling and ass-slapping, but fewer blowjobs and actual sexual intercourse than other party sites.
Bottom Line:
I took a long time before joining this sight, but find it an interesting one after having been a member of many more intensely sexual sights. Watching people at a party can be interesting.
While there are more performers per scene, there seems to be less actual intercourse per scene than most other sights.
If you enjoy watching lots of naked ladies walking around fancy parties being fondled and ass-slapped with some actual sex this would be your perfect sight.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I have joined the site again after more than a few memberships over the years. The beautiful models keep on enticing me back.
For those who love playful spanking, the great models at this site bare their beautiful butts in a huge quantity of scenes (over 1000 at this point).
Regular updates, good lighting, and crisp photography make this a great site for lovers of pure, friendly spanking.
Cons:
Not a site for those who are looking for tears or real pain. The models here are having fun and enjoy the butt-slapping. While a few butts turn cherry red, most butts get just warmly pink here.
No sex or even promises of sensuality in most of the scenes. This is just playful fun.
With so much content there are a great number of scenes for many of the models (like Allison Miller). This may be a plus or a minus depending on your enjoyment of individual models.
Very repetitive in format, like most spanking sites.
Bottom Line:
What can a guy who keeps coming back to this site say? The models are just terribly attractive and I enjoy watching the spanking.
Price is not a bargain, but still reasonable considering the tons of content. For those who love spanking, it's hard not to make this a site one of those to periodically join.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- The models here are the best looking anywhere
- the spankings are in the moderate to hard category
- very good emphasis on the showing both front and back angles of scene
- videos are of excellent quality with short scenerios and set ups
- also have many continuing series like spanked stewardesses
- many of the girls are in progressively better videos beginning with soft spanking and moving up to harder ones
- some reality based scenes - school paddling in Texas take off. Some of these are very imaginative.
- some of the ladies are both tops and bottoms
- there are MF and FF scenes. About evenly split.
- This is one of the older sights on the web. There is a large archive of older stuff and movies from models
- Most models are nice and curvy on the rear. There are many videos featuring Amy Denson, Shannon Carson etc from the old days.
- Almost all models are either pretty or gorgeous.
- There are some bonus areas - spanking in movies, photo shoots only etc.
Cons:
- Spankings are from medium to hard, but not usually super hard like Dallas, RGE or Mood.
- Latley many of the models are recyled from other sights. Although Samantha Woodley is gorgeous she is featured in dozens of videos, many repetitive.
- The guys (spankers) on this sight are horrible. One guy in almost all the videos is super fat and talks in a boring monotone.
- I would like to see a little more post spanking rubbing etc.
- Picture sets are not always satisfying
Bottom Line:
This is one of the standard sights to join if you are a spanking fan. I come back about once a year and gobble up everything they have.
The women are slways beautiful. Samantha Woodley, AJ Rutherford, Michaela McGowen, N. Peachey are awesome have great butts and get spanked pretty hard. You can see that are in slight discomfort but not really in pain or crying like some other sights.
Also the clothing and scene set ups are great. The series where Samantha and McGowen dress like stewardesses is really hot and if you have traveled much by air lately you probably would like to spank an air hostess or two.
There are probably 30 good models and many movies to enjoy with a variety. I like several of the other models also. Two of my favorites are Natasha Edwards who is a pretty honey blonde with a nice body and snotty attitude and another petite blonde named Rachel Young whose rear always gets turned super red.
Overall, if you are a spanking fan this sight should be in your top 3 or 4 stops. It is a bit on the "glam" side rather than reality but is clearly an niche leader.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
