Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- One of the all time stalwarts among spanking sights
- Long reliable track record.
- A huge number of girls. The large majority are very young and cute looking.
- Each girl is given an introductary spanking that is moderate and an accompanying interview - some never make it past this stage others move on to harsher and harsher spankings
- there are a variety of different themed shoots. The best are "school paddling" which is a realistic and I mean realistic reenactment of school paddling. These are GREAT and worth the price of admission.
- There is also a faces series which shows a lot of reaction shots that I like.
- Level of spanking is from moderate to severe. There is also a variety of implements used. Hand, small paddle, belt, graduating up to big paddle, lexon paddle, and canes.
- There are some cute new girls here as well as many legendary spankees. Kaylee a punky girl with a great butt and a perpetual smirk on her face was "discovered here".
-
Cons:
- they were not adding content as much in the last few years. I rejoin about once every 18 months.
- The biggest criticism is that sometimes it tends to get mechanical and one spanking looks like the next.
- Also they do two or three shoots a day and the girl starts out red at the beginning of the scene.
- They seem to cut the scene right as soon as the spanking is over. I like to see post spanking rubbing and there are only a few of these.
- Picture sets are fairly limited.
- A little too much chatter sometimes
Bottom Line:
This sight once dominated the spanking scene and is still among the top five or so. The girls are cute and the spanking pretty hard. There is a good mix in the type of girls, but most fit the 18-23 year old mold. One exception is the wife of Coach Daniels. She is a middle aged blonde women who both dishes out and takes some real hard ones.
There is a large network of related sights to this one and they usually run specials if you want to join more than one. They have individual girls sights for the lithe Brandi, the red headed step child Jessica and new recruit Bailey.
There is also a bulletin board where you can ask questions and make suggestions.
Navigation is good with a list of all the girls' pictures. When you click on their face, you get a list of all their videos with a brief preview.
You can also sort by different scenerio type - these include School paddlings, Naked school paddlings, school canings, Faces, cheerleaders, multiple girl scenes, and probably a half a dozen more.
Another way to sort is by implement - cane, paddle, lexon paddle, hairbrush etc.
I have joined this sight probably every 18 months for the past five years, plus grabbed freebees when I can. If you are a spanker, this is probably stil a top four or five sight.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- The models here are the best looking anywhere
- the spankings are in the moderate to hard category
- very good emphasis on the showing both front and back angles of scene
- videos are of excellent quality with short scenerios and set ups
- also have many continuing series like spanked stewardesses
- many of the girls are in progressively better videos beginning with soft spanking and moving up to harder ones
- some reality based scenes - school paddling in Texas take off. Some of these are very imaginative.
- some of the ladies are both tops and bottoms
- there are MF and FF scenes. About evenly split.
- This is one of the older sights on the web. There is a large archive of older stuff and movies from models
- Most models are nice and curvy on the rear. There are many videos featuring Amy Denson, Shannon Carson etc from the old days.
- Almost all models are either pretty or gorgeous.
- There are some bonus areas - spanking in movies, photo shoots only etc.
Cons:
- Spankings are from medium to hard, but not usually super hard like Dallas, RGE or Mood.
- Latley many of the models are recyled from other sights. Although Samantha Woodley is gorgeous she is featured in dozens of videos, many repetitive.
- The guys (spankers) on this sight are horrible. One guy in almost all the videos is super fat and talks in a boring monotone.
- I would like to see a little more post spanking rubbing etc.
- Picture sets are not always satisfying
Bottom Line:
This is one of the standard sights to join if you are a spanking fan. I come back about once a year and gobble up everything they have.
The women are slways beautiful. Samantha Woodley, AJ Rutherford, Michaela McGowen, N. Peachey are awesome have great butts and get spanked pretty hard. You can see that are in slight discomfort but not really in pain or crying like some other sights.
Also the clothing and scene set ups are great. The series where Samantha and McGowen dress like stewardesses is really hot and if you have traveled much by air lately you probably would like to spank an air hostess or two.
There are probably 30 good models and many movies to enjoy with a variety. I like several of the other models also. Two of my favorites are Natasha Edwards who is a pretty honey blonde with a nice body and snotty attitude and another petite blonde named Rachel Young whose rear always gets turned super red.
Overall, if you are a spanking fan this sight should be in your top 3 or 4 stops. It is a bit on the "glam" side rather than reality but is clearly an niche leader.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
There is a model index.
They have an updates calendar.
Most of the models are attractive girl next door types (or would be if the girl next door ever really looked like that).
A massive catalogue of material to choose from.
Old and experienced site with a good reputation, and reliable billing agents, so you shouldn't be risking your money.
They do have photos.
No DRM.
No download limit.
No regional discrimination for subscribers.
Very good value at $21.95.
The clips are quite often filmed in real time, without too many cuts or unnatural breaks.
There are usually 2 camera angles. One for the girl's ass, and one for the face.
Cons:
Poor and confusing navigation, although it has improved in the past year.
The videos are even at the highest 700 kb/sec rate, not great quality by today's standards. Some of the old clips are very poor quality.
No WMV, only a choice of Flash Player or Real Media.
The clips have watermarks that can sometimes be obtrusive and annoying.
The best spankers have disappeared. The more recent productions have been weak.
They went nearly 2 years without new material, relying mostly on what had already been shot, while they waited to move to a new studio.
Not that many models, few new ones recently. So you see the same faces, (or whatever) a lot of the time.
Far too many clothed spankings, especially in recent years.
Being American the cane is hardly ever used, and then only very lightly.
The photos are posed, and not from the actual spanking clip.
Too much talking.
Some of the clips are cut up into ridiculously short segments, sometimes straight down the middle of the action.
Bottom Line:
Bottom line - very appropriate given the niche.
I was last a member of this site about a year ago. I rejoined because my computer got a virus and all my files were wiped out. I wouldn't have joined for the more modern clips. The best spankers Lady D left long ago, and Mr M is not to be seen, most of the time.
The recent clips I find far too light and usually with the model partially or fully clothed. I find this boring. The old clips are by far the best, but the drawback is the quality is quite poor on a lot of these. They are redoing some of them in a new bit rate of 700kb/sec.
The picture quality and sound has improved over the years as the content quality has decreased IMO.
Here is roughly the bit rate over the years.
2001 - 75kb/sec
2002 - 150 kb/sec. Some clips redone in 750kb/sec or 350 kb/sec from here onwards.
2003 - 225 or 450kb/sec.
2004 - 225 or 450kb/sec.
2005 - 225 or 450kb/sec
2006 - 350/700 kb/sec mostly from here.
Despite all the negatives I would still recommend this site as the No.1 choice for anyone who is interested in spanking but has never joined a spanking website. Some other sites deliver harder spankings, but here they are usually around moderate severity, which is reasonably safe, and almost old fashioned, for those who have an interest in this sort of thing. It is not my favourite spanking site because of all the negatives, but I still find it good value. It is almost the Video Box of the spanking world. It is like finding a 3 story warehouse of spanking clips. If you are looking for a clip in particular, it is quite hard to find. At least they have a reasonable model directory and calendar of updates. Last year I would have said this site has the worst navigation in the known universe, with the one exception of my girlfriend's map reading, but things have improved a little. The site now looks like something from the 21st century. A lot of faults, but is worth a look given the price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I won't repeat all the stats that others have done so eloquently here. So, I will keep it brief and relevant.
In terms of quality, it is excellent. The newer movies are top notch with good editing.
The women are well known but the slant on their presentation makes for a refreshing change. I have seen Trinity Post a gazillion times but not the way she is portayed on this site. The same goes for all the 'known' babes.
I like this site because it is not just focused on the S&M action but includes sex which, for me, is crucial.
The guys certainly know their thing and it always makes for a smoother experience.
Great 'feel'.
Sensible layout with multiple download options for movies and pics.
Cons:
Not much content.
Old films are grainy.
Older films are grainy and almost invisible. I believe a gnat would have a better change of ascertaining the action within.
Misleading star search. I searched for Adriana Nicole and found many links for her but the way the links were presented they lead the user to believe the star is on the sexandsubmissive site. However, you are led to another Kink.com site whereby you have to sell an organ or two to join. This form of clever external linking is a new trend that is both annoying and underhand. Spreading content by the same star across sites under the same umbrella that require further subs is not something I like.
Could do with some different scenery and situations.
Could do with some fresh faces that we have not come across.
I need more ethnic babes, more fukin' stockings and classy outfits and maybe some bush would be a refreshing change.
Bottom Line:
Refreshing and fucking sexy even if you are not into the S&M type of content, which I am not.
Great quality on the newer films and it's about time others followed suit.
Needs more content and more updates.
Needs an all-in umbrella membership so we can get all the babes under one roof. Hell, I'd pay the difference in price.
One of my favourite sites and very cleverly thought out to grab the middle market of dudes like me who like lovely babes getting a tad roughed but not bludgeoned beyond recognition.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Spankings quite severe and real
- Attractive, young girls
- Most girl have pubic hair.
- Good navigation
- Pics & vids each set.
- Sets not just in isolation: set within context of aims of the 'Real Spanking Institute', which gives shoots greater focus.
- Range of implements used: paddles, canes, straps, broad perspex plastic canes (real brutes of things. At least one really good scene with this)
Cons:
- School uniform seems to dictate that standard shool underwear is but, white, baggy things which come out of grandma's wardrobe. Would have greater appeal of far more girls were caught wearing 'non-regulation' underwear.
- Not enough nudity.
- Use of hands for spanking. Get real! A hand spanking really does "hurt me more than it's going to hurt you." With all the wonderful implements available, why use hands?
Bottom Line:
This is a convincing site. The introductory information presents the site within the context of how prison was not working for young female inmates, so the Government set up the Real Spanking Insitute as an experiment to bring these troubled young women back onto the straight and narrow. (Good to know the US Governent has some sensible policies. Someone should have a word in the ear of our man in Australia, Kevin Rudd, about this policy!)
The spankings vary in severity, according to the girl's misdemeanors, scenarios framed according to how much punishment and nudity the model has opted for.
On this point, the pay for the girls varies according to the severity of the spanking, and the amount of nudity they show.
I'm surprised at how little full nudity there is - If their butts are going to be beaten to a pulp, (which many of the girls obviously opt for) I can't understand why they don't go fully nude and get paid more.
There are, however, some really good scenes - and at least a few full nude scenes where the girls get a fairly severe buttock padding.
overall a good site, if you like this sort of thing.
One of the models featured is Jessica, whio also has her own site: Spanking Teen Jessica.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Many very attractive pornstars.
-Multiple scenes from Eva Angelina, Bobbi Star, and Jada Fire. Jada's best workever.
-Ethnic mix of white, black, Latina and Asian models.
--No DRM or download limits.
-Archive of 205 videos, going back to May 2005.
-Newest videos are about an hour long.
-Supports download managers with excellent download speeds. Mine was 2500kb.
-Videos available as excellent DVD quality MP4 or as WMV 1280x720,7158kbps. Older videos are lower quality.
-Videos can be streamed. Downloads come as clips, while whole videos can be zipdownloaded, and in a few cases can be downloaded as whole videos as well as in clips.
-Photosets for every video. Can be zipdownloaded. They are screenshots that are 1200x675 and very sharp.
-Exclusive material. Mostly known pornstars.
-Mostly the girls seem to be really into the action. They don't come across as acting. The site claims the girls are told not to pretend, but to have genuine reactions.
-Updates at least once a wk
Cons:
-Too many pornstar looking typical bleach blondes.
-All videos shot in the same location. A little variety would be better.
Bottom Line:
This is a light BDSM site, so it is not for everybody. This is my second membership in this site. It has gotten better and better over the last two years since I was last a member. This is the highest that I have ever rated any site, regardless of niche. There is a lot of great sex along with the BDSM, and can be VERY hot. The only site in this niche that comes even close is fuckedandbound.com, but this is much better both in the sex and in the dominance. I am much more into the sex than in the BDSM aspects and can tell you that the sex is amazing. If you like the niche, you cannot do better than to join this site. It has a very large archive of high entertainment value videos and great quality that can be compared to the best videos available on the net.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. The quality of videos has improved as time goes by, camerawork is excellent in general.
2. Many beautiful ladies participating in S&M sessions with spanking, bondage, and rough (but smiling) sex.
3. Site goes out of its way with before and after shoots to show that sex was TOTALLY consentual and enjoyed by all parties.
4. Much more creative than other sites, often including more than one girl in a session, something I find much more interesting.
Cons:
1. While I enjoy the site and it does have some outdoor shots, the general dungeon, rusty factory kind of scenes get old. I'd enjoy some hot scenes in more luxurious surroundings.
Bottom Line:
I've been enjoying Sex & Submission for a long time (I think I first joined when it was pretty new a few years ago). It now has tons of content for those who enjoy spanking, bondage, and rough sex. At about $30 USD its a bargain for the quality and quantity.
The girls either really enjoy it or are great actresses, smiling and saying how they'd love to come back and do more sessions. I've been coming back periodically for a few years myself.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-More than enough content for several months of subscription.
-Attractive performers all of them, no matter the body type (and they do vary) they are each attractive.
- Enthusiastic (as in real) reactions of pain and arousal from the women.
- For those than love hardcore sex in bondage scenarios, Sex and Submission delivers the perfect hybrid.
Cons:
- Some fairly well-known performers kinda takes some of the street cred from the site. Kind of replaces the whole dirty, underground feel with a mainstream vibe. (Maybe I just don't want to be seeing Steven St. Croix...)
- The "I totally didn't hate this" testimonial at the end is pretty lame, though I understand why they have it. Yeah, I'm stretching.
- Scenes do mirror each other somewhat.
Bottom Line:
The site is amazing. Great balance of video quality and download speed. The scenes are just plain hot, despite the sometimes routine approach. For those that love hardcore fucking delivered with their BDSM instead of just whipping for whipping's sake, then this is just another in a whole family of sites with memorable scenes , incredibly sexy performers, and tons of content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The newer films are high quality, with decent res still images too.
- The bondage ropework is superb.
- The equipment - from collars to racks to cages - is great.
- Most of the women are suitable for their roles.
- A couple of the Doms seem to know their onions, especially Mark Davis and Steve Holmes.
Cons:
- The older films are not great quality and the stills are just blurred frame grabs.
- The scenarios can be formulaic.
- Some of the Doms are not convincing.
- It's not really a con, but I'd like to see more ethnic variety amongst the girls and the men.
Bottom Line:
A very good niche site, and with the newer films taking the visual quality up, well worth joining.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ femsub training (by both males and females, but mostly males) combined with sex
+ strong psychological element
+ Safe, Sane and Consensual BDSM
+ most models (both male and female) really love it
+ ability to leave feedback
+ ability to download whole episode as a ZIP
+ video/image quality is good
+ cameraguy work is excellent
+ setups are good
Cons:
- still less content than other kink.com sites
- training of the same girl is divided into several episodes (which is ok), but these episodes appear not one after another, which is annoying
Bottom Line:
TheTrainingOfO is quite a recent addition to kink.com sites. It is quite similar to SexAndSumbission, but also is very different. The idea is that the same guys take one girl and train her as a good slave. It takes them 4 days to do it (actually 5 with 1 day rest), which means ability to see gradual progress of the girl. Not all girls succeed in training, but most are trained well. Site has very strong psychological element in play, and it's a bit more geared towards domination/submission theme, than towards SM or sex (though there is plenty of both SM and sex too, with all kinds of sex present, including anal).
As all other kink.com sites, TheTrainingOfO is all about SSC (Safe, Sane and Consensual) BDSM, with most models being really into the scene. Chemistry is usually excellent, and overall feeling is just great.
Site is new, but at this point they've already got about 50 episodes (which is still less than other kink.com sites, but quite enough for me).
Bottom line: one of the best BDSM sites out there, with strong emphasis on psychology, a bit physics, with lots of sex added to the mix. Highly recommended (in a sense, it's "advanced version" of SexAndSubmission, at least for me).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Site is large and accurately described - bondage etc.
Large range of activity with much deep throat and anal
Quality of videos constantly improving and up to avi (few) and wmv hd
Pictures of good quality
Interviews add sense of models as people
Some good role play scenes
Feedback pages
Cons:
As usual, virtually all models are shaved - reduces variety
Most scenes set in amorphous dungeon
Model search possible, but only off the screen featuring photo/videoset
Old videos 340x240 and RM
Bottom Line:
Good quality site focused on the BDSM niche with attractive models undergoing submission and offering all orifices!
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- maledom/femsub submission combined with sex (as site name suggests)
- most models (both male and female) really love it;
- variety; new ideas all the time
- ability to leave feedback (and sometimes even get the answer :-); also they're open to users ideas for future shoots)
- ZIPped downloads (ability to download whole episode as a ZIP)
- video/image quality is good
- cameraguy work is excellent
- setups are very good
- navigation is extremely easy and obvious
Cons:
- thrashy billing and authentication system; recurring intermittent problems with logging in
- number of models is rather limited (though models that keep appearing are very good).
Bottom Line:
One of kink.com sites (the same company that is famous for their hogtied.com and fuckingmachines.com sites); lots of models are the same with other kink.com sites, though content is unique (sharing models with other sites of similar niches can be good or bad depending on point of view).
As usual for kink.com sites, most (if not all) of the models are really into it, which (if chemistry of specific models matches) creates very strong feeling of the real Safe Sane Consensual BDSM encounter.
Site has very convenient system of member comments, which helps to create 'community feeling'; also it seems that they do read comments and take them into account.
Bottom line: Highly recommended for lovers of this specific niche (Safe, Sane and Consensual BDSM, as opposed to sites simulating rape/violence); definitely best in class.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
•Very unique – it’s more about the training than hardcore sex, though there is sex
•Fast download speeds
•It may not look like there is a lot of content, but the clips are long
•Beautiful women
Cons:
• Updates are only once a week (but since this is entirely their own product I can forgive that)
• Updates appear to be staggered (in other words they don’t upload one training day per girl in sequence – that means that if you like a particular girl you may need to hang around for a couple of months to get all her stuff)
• There is a lack of continuity in the scenes which takes away from the realism. For example, the girl might have welts on her ass that are ‘gone’ right after that.
Bottom Line:
Excellent site and promises to get better as more material is added. I’ve never seen a site quite like this. I also plan to take out memberships on other sites on the Kink network based on my positive experiences with this site.
Obviously if you have little or no interest in , or are offended by BDSM, D/s, stuff then you shouldn’t bother with a membership. If you do like this stuff I can’t imagine that there is a better site out there. The premise is pretty simple: take a willing woman and submit her to four days of training. At the end she’s a submissive slut.
I highly recommend this site if you are into this kind of kink.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
A very good site for those into bondage, submission and fucking. Females are trim, for the most part, but some like Claire Dames and Katja Kassin have generous attributes. Acting by most females is very good. There are now over 121 shoots, and more on the way. Downloads, even for ipods are available.
Quality of submissives is excellent. Most are restrained in intriguing ways that will appeal to anyone into this kind of fetish.
Cons:
Lighting can be poor at times, and some of the clips do not seem to be edited well, making a download of a particular sequence troublesome. Male doms try to rough and look buff. However, the acting of male doms leaves something to be desired. For a site like this, the guys need to look rough and menacing.
Some of the restraint positions for the females do not allow good camera angles for viewing. Focusing more on female faces rather than male butts would help.
Bottom Line:
While there are others that do the restraint and fucking scenarios, this site, so far, is the best and largest. Some of the submissives like Jade Marxx and Tawni Ryden alone make visiting this site worth while.
This site could stand some new kinds of torture and punishment for the females, such as better acted whippings and suspension scenes. The use of creative double penetrations and even gangbangs for the submissives would attract a wider audience and offer a new dimension to this site.
The acting of some females, like Isis Love, is a bonus, and should encourage this group to get their actresses to play their roles with an added sense of being punished or ravaged. Also, males could stand to be better built and hung, and give the impression of being very menacing.
Overall, for the money, this is an enjoyable and entertaining site. However, their competition is not far behind and in a few instances, doing things that will lure paying visitors to their sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. Just joined Real Spanking again for about the fourth time in four or five years because it still has some of the best spanking on the internet when it comes to good hard belt, strap, paddle, or hand action. Great spankers and a few great spankees.
2. New design allows you to look over a long gallery of girls' faces and click to get to the scenes each girl has done - a GREAT feature.
3. Site has girls spanked on tight jeans as well as bare bottoms, great for a jeans enthusiast like me.
Cons:
1. The great variety of sessions, but it also has a great variety of quality (from excellent to very boring) and it takes lots of time to find the wonderful gems among all the boring stuff.
The reaction of the girls is important. Watching a totally stoic, silent girl get spanked (even if she's pretty) is not a turn-on for me. But then there are great sessions with passionate, vibrant, and loud reactions. However, you have to really spend time looking for them.
Bottom Line:
I keep coming back to this site, despite its flaws, because it has some of the best, strong spankers on the internet (not mild patty-cake stuff here).
The quality varies from boring to excellent with a wide variety of girls from "OK" to "really cute."
I enjoy variety of scenarios and actually look forward to see girls get apanked with jeans on as well as with with bare butts. I like the strong reaction some of the girls give (yell a little...hey, it hurts!), but am bored by the quiet and strong models who often just stoicly wait for it to be over.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
1. Large variety of girls, some of whom are very pretty.
2. Schoolgirl theme with schoolgirl skirts and panties, then bare-bottom spankings.
3. Spankings range from moderate to quite severe.
4. Variety of spanking impliments.
5. Usually good view of faces are included, as well as the sore backside.
6. Very reasonable price, less than $20 USD/mo
Cons:
1. "You were a naughty girl" lectures are distracting, time-consuming and very boring after a few videos. Shorter spankings without lectures would improve the site.
2. Only real video, not MPEG or WMV.
3. Only schoolgirl uniform spanking, no tight jeans (my favorite) or other costumes.
4. Only punishment fetish, no sexual content.
Bottom Line:
For moderate to severe spanking of uniformed "schoolgirls" at a reasonable price, this is a good deal. Be warned: the verbal lectures are really boring and time-consuming. "Real Spankings" main website is a site with more content and variety, but also slightly more expensive. If you love the "uniformed schoolgirl" spanking fetish and don't mind the long lectures, this site is for you.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
