Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+Exclusive content
+Large collection of photos and videos
+Quite a few "name" models who appear elsewhere
+Fast download speeds (1-1.5 Mbps)
+Zips of photos at 3000 pixels from 2008 to present
+Some zips of photos at 1500 pixels (earlier)
+Videos in wmv HD (1280x720), wmv standard (640x360), and MP4 (more recent); wmv standard for earlier; many videos stream also
+166 "hi def" videos are hardcore b/g or g/g videos; but there are lots more of interviews and solo footsie fun
+Allows use of download manager
+Foot fiend navigation niches: find only the stuff for dangling shoes, or tickling, or food, or another of many choices.
Cons:
-Navigation is too complicated; well, the site is too complicated, really
-Inconsistencies in video formats available even in the same part of the site history
-Quality of wmv "standard" videos not so good
-Photos in 1500 pixels not in zip files once they began offering "full scene" zips in Jan 2008
-They don't make it clear that the "full scene zipped photo sets" usually contain ALL of the photos of a model, even the ones that are shown in earlier sets such as "Meet" and "Living" and "Self-Sucking" and so on.
Bottom Line:
I'm not much of a foot fan, but overall I liked the content of this site. In fact, my hunt for nice pictures of girls showing their asses was my "sole" (a-hem) purpose in joining.
The photos from 2008 on are nice quality, if not super professional. There are plenty of hot models (Veronica Rodriquez, Ashley Jane, Jynx Maze, Marlena, Sammi Rhodes, Elle Alexandra, Emma Mae, Georgia Jones, Nikki Brookes, etc.). And it's all exclusive material, and it goes all the way back to 2004. (Wow, the quality sure has improved since then!)
You can also watch interview videos of the girls telling you about their sexual experiences and turn-ons. Beyond that, well, you can watch a lot of them getting down to gentle foot-and-pussy play with another girl, and/or foot/pussy fucking with a hardened male.
But there are problems with consistency in the offerings and with how things are presented. You can get hi def versions of many videos, but not all. You can get zips of some sizes of photos, but not all. You see the thumbs of only the hardcore photos, but actually the zip file has hundreds of photos that include the softcore and solo foot stuff of a model. You click the "Hi Def" movies link, but that's not all of the hi def movies. And the foot niches drop-down menu appears on some pages, but not on all of the pages you'd like it to. You may find yourself opening multiple tabs or windows just to keep part of the navigation at hand, which means that you're having to compensate for less-than-stellar web design. And in so doing, you'll wind up making the experience of the site more complicated.
About the complexity of the site, some may say that it just has a lot of navigation options, which can only be a good thing. After all, you can look at content that's only "Kick Ass Feet," or only "Flowers Exclusive," or only "Mark Archer Exclusive," or only "Barefoot Confidential." But do these terms mean anything to you? The term "exclusive" got me thinking they were different from what I was seeing on the page until I realized (by looking at the bottom of the page) that each entry is color-coded for these terms. Oh, well, now that's nice. Flowers is blue; Mark Archer is green; Kick Ass is pink; and Barefoot is purple. Well, I don't have to learn the color system, but I have wasted my time by wondering if I should.
Plus, there are 16 bonus sites included, but each one contains only 8 galleries and/or videos. Some are only videos ... And some are really old stuff (but not all). And you're given an offer in the bonus sites to join the "Kick Ass Network" for only $14.95. The "Kick Ass" bonus section includes that offer as well. So there's "Kick Ass" bonus and "Kick Ass" network and they're probably not the same thing. You know what? Fuck it.
I mean, I've already spent $30.
Anyway, I do recommend this site for its abundant quality exclusive content, but be forewarned that if you're not careful, the design and complexity could lead you to needless distraction.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A big foot fetish site with an emphasis on regular foot fetish -- meaning the male and sometimes or female enjoy kissing, touching and licking her feet.
They have 618 scenes, each scene has a photo set and video. They add 1 new scene per week.
Includes access to Adult Time, it changes the original navigation and feel of the site, but works without any major differences or problems.
Someone at the site has a good, working knowledge of foot fetishism. There aren't a lot of male talents used on this site, but the ones that are seem to be real foot fetishists.
High production values for a fetish site.
Cons:
General lack of reverse foot fetish content -- meaning the woman whose feet and legs are being licked, kissed and caressed is only aroused by being the one having it done to her. The women in the scenes seem to be as much into their feet as the men are.
Even as a reverse foot fetishist, I recognize the redundancy of a niche like this one.
I would be happier with it if they focused more on the legs and feet with clothing choices (hose, stockings and leggings) instead of having most of the newer scenes focusing on the bare feet and legs.
Bottom Line:
Foot fetishists are viewed as strange. People generally believe a foot fetishist is someone that walks around with toes on their breath. A foot fetishist doesn't even have to include the feet. It can be the gait of a woman's walk that starts the attraction to her legs and on down, instead of on up.
The newer scenes are disappointing to me. They are shot from an already ready view. The woman is usually already out of her hose or stockings or leggings. A body part fetish -- in my opinion -- should focus on that body part and include what would be called "worship".
The worship here is relegated to kissing, licking, sucking on feet, legs and toes. Did they run out of fishnet stockings? Tight leggings that seduce the man from her ankles up to her knees and back down? It might sound like these are not legitimate negatives, but in a fetish of a body part, that body part should be the most wanted by the person fulfilling the fetish.
They do seem to put a lot of work, time and even money into the scenes, but they have also fallen into the "if ain't broke" mantra. I am sure there are foot fetishist that are happy with that. It just does not appeal as much to a reverse foot fetishist.
The producers of this site -- 21 Sextury -- also have the site 21 Foot Art. It has more content for reverse foot fetishists. This site is a good site for foot lovers. I have heard a lot of male foot fetishists love to see the woman alternate sucking on her own toes and the guy's penis. They feature that "position" in a lot of their scenes. I am surprised they don't have a category for it.
Four of the male actors are prominently featured on foot fetish sites -- Charlie Dean, Toby, Kristof Cale and Vince Carter. This is one niche that requires the male to do more than get it up, stick it in, last 20 minutes and give a good ejaculation. They have to be able to focus on the feet, legs and toes while doing all those other parts.
The female models are mostly very pretty, European and do at least enjoy having their feet kissed and licked. As someone that discovered their own interest in this niche, I sometimes wonder about he female model's enjoyment and real interest in the fetish. I am saying this is one time I would like to see the female models talk about which parts (toe licking/sucking, sole licking, entire leg licking) turns them on most, but their inability to speak English limits that interaction.
Minor improvements are needed, but most of those are subjective. It would rate a little higher if they relied more on clothes than shoes/strap sandals. It's a very good deal within an Adult Time membership.
It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some.
Bottom Line:
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Unique focus. I know there are foot fetish sites out there but most are amateur sites that don't bring all the weight kink.com can bring.
- Lots of model diversity: Pregnancy, interracial, female-female, male-female.
- great imagination: everything for kinky nuns to squirting strippers. I like the unpredictability of what the next update might have brought.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Lots of my favorite fetish models have shot here - plus a good mix of up and comers. Penny Paz and Christy Mack were smoking hot.
- Allows download managers
Cons:
- Defunct site. Last update was March of 2015
- Just over 100 scenes
- Foot insertions were a turn off for me. But I can't complain too much it's a foot fetish site.
- Organization is hurting. Shoots are uploaded chronologically, while there are keywords they're misapplied and overly broad (bare pussy for example). You can search by model but if you don't know what you're looking for you have a hard time finding it.
No way to "favorite" things for future viewing
Bottom Line:
I'm not a foot fetish guy but there was still enough her for me to enjoy. Lots of different set-ups and model types kept things interesting. Part of what kept it's score down was the lack of content, no longer updating, and being too far out of the mainstream for me (I wrestled with that after all it is a foot site in a network named kink - but all the foot insertions were too much for me)
Had the site kept updating and had they been a little more sparing with the insertions I probably would have scored this site closer to a 90.
Streaming and multiple formats keep things simple.
The price is too high for just this site. That said if you are into kinky stuff this network is a gold mine. There's so much here it's certainly worth a months membership to explore. I intended to join for just a month but stayed longer and will return later now that my membership has lapsed
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
07-23-1002:56am (Update History) Reason: This is a new review, I don't know why it was catalogued as "expired review"...
Pros:
-The archive is not huge, but big enough (248 scenes)
-Exclusive sets, mostly
-Gorgeus European models (including Sophie Moone, Blue Angel or Eve Angel)
-Excellent video quality and different download options
-Reasonable price: 19.95$ with the PU offer, and you also get this site in the 21st Sextury pack (which is probably the best option)
-Good artistic look in all the videos
-All-in-one zips for pictures
-Some variety in the type of sets: mostly solo and b/g sets, with some g/g
Cons:
-Only 1 update a week
-No bonus content
-The style in the videos is elegant, but a little repetitive at times
-Some models do not look like they are enjoying themselves too much
Bottom Line:
I was totally convinced that at some point I had made a review of this site, but apparently, I hadn't. So here I go. I was a member of this site some years ago, when it first opened and it worked as an individual site, and I am now a member again, thanks to the 21st Sextury pack offer. When it was just the one site, I remember that I used to get a little frustrated, because the updates were too slow (they used to "slice up" the sets through a whole week) and I didn't get any extra content. Now, with it being a part of this site-pack, it's easier to be patient and wait for the updates to come.
After visitting other few sites in this same niche, I think Footsie Babes is up there with Hot Legs and Feet and Foot Fetish Daily, as one of the top foot fetish sites available anywhere, probably in a close third place (HL&F being my absoluto favorite). It has classy and sexy models with beautiful feet, the quality of the videos is great, and the size of the archive is acceptable.
The bigger problem with this site, as with most 21st Sextury sites, is that it updates quite slowly (at least for my standards): just one update a week is not enough, and it can be really frustrating if you opt for a short membership and you don't like one or two of the last updates, for whatever reason.
And I have to say, that although it is difficult to say why, Footsiebabes tend to dissapoint me a little with their scenes. They have gorgeus models, they have good material, and yet, they tend not to hit the exact spot when dealing with foot worship, footjobs or foot fucking. I think the directors and editors should take a look at DDF and Kick Ass for inspiration on how to treat feet in a video, and also on how to set the appropriate mood for the scene... Anyway, I am well aware that this is just my personal taste, and other users may love the 21st Sextury way of doing foot fetish videos...
My bottom line, to sum up, is quite simple: I like this site, but I recommend getting access to it by getting the whole 21st Sextury pass, not as an individual site. If you are a foot fetish man like myself, you will enjoy it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A good sized archive of pictures. Probably 400-700 models
- A large variety of model types from every category (young/old, vanilla/ethinic, skinny/voluptous etc.
- picture sets are sorted by either model or by "specialty sets" including peeping Tom, Socks, Panty pudding, undercurrent, hose beast etc.
- There is a real paper and ink magazine (remember those) that goes with the site and you can also navigate that way.
- Models go from good to excellent
- Content also has a large variety including sets featuring generic stripping, toys, and boy/girl, girl/girl scenerios.
- There are sets with slow peeling of clothes and many photos in various stages of undress.
- Well maintained site - includes forum, frequent updates, what's new, etc.
Videos are presented by model or directly in video window. There are both short and long videos and most can be either downloaded or viewed streaming.
- Got in on the 19.95 special
-Picutres are avaiable in medium or large size (800 vs 1600)
Cons:
- Picture quality was not always up to current standards. Many pictures are small and washed out looking.
- Also many pictures look highly air brushed. Others have white clothes on white background which lose definition.
- Many models have only a single 20 picture photo set. Others have only a single 60 picture photo set. Very few have more than one or two photo sets, so when you find a model you really like you don't have the quantity of her to go after.
-Pictures appear out of sequence. The girl many strip down and the next ten photos have her with here clothes on again.
- I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights/
Bottom Line:
I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights and came away a bit disappointed. I am a photo guy not a video guy and about half the pictures are too old and washed out to be useful. The most recent content is much better and there are about 5 or 6 models that hit it right on the nail - Extravagant lingerie or tight clothing, slow stripping, nice posing in clothes and out.
My bottom line is I think in this age of specialization, this sight is too broad based. Are they a lingerie/glamour sight? Are they a foot fetish sight? (What is a leg fetish anyway)
Are they a standard photo sight? Are they a pantyhose sight?
I don't want to trash LEGSEX because I got some really good photos out of it - just not enough.
For example I am just about done with my membership and I have downloaded 403 pictures from LEGSEX. I went to my Only Tease directory and the total from there was 1,919.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Great download speeds that are at my maximum.
Comes with 23 high quality interracial sites on the Dogfart Network
The combination of two unusual niches, interracial porn and foot porn makes for a rare, maybe even unique site.
Uses Epoch as a biller and you can pay with Paypal, as well as any of 100 gift cards.
Easy site navigation and excellent download speeds.
PU has a discount
Cons:
A small site with only 56 updates.
4K costs extra per scene.
Bottom Line:
We on Pornusers have very few reviews for foot focused porn sites. The scenes have a variety of sex acts, including oral, vaginal and anal. However, the scenes use the female model’s feet for foreplay, as a break from other sex acts, as well as for the cumshots.
The scenarios vary and use themes that are common on other pornsites. A good example is a recent update where a mother, Kay Carter, and her stepdaughter Percy Sires, are the female talent. The mother teaches her stepdaughter how to be sexy with her feet. The male stars are black and well hung, of course. Prince Yashua is one of the most prolific of male black pornstars and he is accompanied by Donny Sins as the recipients of the female attention. The premise here is that the stepdaughter got into a car accident and does not have the money to pay for the repairs to the other car. Her stepmother makes a deal for foot sex in this fantasy scene.
This site has many big name American pornstars such as Aidra Fox, Kenzie Reeves, Shona River, Brooklyn Chase, Riley Reid, Casey Calvert, Veruca James, Chastity Lynn, Kagney Lynn Karter, Eva Angelina, Remy LaCroix, Darcy Tyler, and Giselle Leon. The male models are some of the best black male stars in the business. Leading the group is Rico Strong with 11 scenes, Brian Pumper with 9, JonJon with 8, and Prince Yashua with 6. All of them are simply huge down there and the contrast in color with the white models is striking.
The video download choices are Full HD 1920x1080, 10,000 kbps and 30 frames per second, HD 1280x720 4600 kbps and 30 frames per second, Medium at 768x432 and Small at 688x384. Despite 4K being mentioned in other reviews as available for an extra fee, I saw no mention of this on the site. A recent photoset had 243 photos, 3000x2003 and there is a mix of portrait photos and landscape screenshots.
One criticism I feel is valid is that there are only 56 videos, despite the fact that the site has existed since 2011. That is not much for a ten year old site. In the past few years, it has hardly updated at all. So far in 2021 there are only two. In all of 2020 there were only four. Often sites die and go archive when models are difficult to find. I am no expert, but I can’t imagine models being unwilling to do a site that focuses on feet. The scenes are pretty much sex that you find on most sites and are not extreme. This is far from circus porn that would wear out a female model.
The site navigation is easy and is very logical. You can search by model, by site, by network or by tags. I found the download speeds to be at about the maximum my computer is capable of.
Pornusers has a discount for a monthly join. Epoch is the biller and it is one of the best you can use. Through them, you can pay with Paypal, as well as using your choice of about 100 gift cards.
Between a nice discount and the network having a huge archive, I recommend that this site is worth checking out if you are into feet as sex objects.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- mobile site worked well on my iphone
- all content is exclusive
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well.
- All interracial.
- Still updating
- shoots can be rated and favourited
- Stand out talents include RILEY REID (is she even capable of shooting a bad scene!?), Kate England, Edyn Blair (who manages and an anal scene in a foot fetish site).
- most scenes end with cum play (on the feet; no surprise. Not unusual to then lick it off)
- Focus on feet is apparent. The cameraman seldom takes eyes off the model's legs & feet
Cons:
- Only updates a few times a year. In all of 2018 there were only four updates. Sometimes there as long as 6 months between updates.
- Not enough updates. With less than 50 total updates it's hard to justify the high price of this site (unless you're looking for the entire network)
- the scenes feel repetitive because it is almost always the same basic set up. Although I was pleasantly surprised that there was hardcore action on top of the foot fetish
- Older content maxes out at a resolution of 640X480 3.2 mbps.
- Every shoot seems to end with a bukkake (maybe that's a plus?). To me, I like my porn to be varied. I prefer to not have the action move in predictable ways.
- The picture downloads are mostly screenshots of the shoot. (However the newer stuff has the model holding posterboard of a hot message or two - some are witty and fun)
Bottom Line:
While I don't have a foot fetish I thought I could give an objective review of this site. (So if this is your kink you may want to take my review with a grain of salt) I've enjoyed the rest of the network for the last three month and will reup for at least another 3 months.
I really appreciate the way the book top-notch talent. While they have a small catalogue ever model is a home run.
I also like the way they tease who is coming next. For example one of the next upcomers is BANDI LOVE (another one that can do no wrong in my opinion).
The biggest reasons for the low score on this site is the lack of updates and the lack of an extensive catalogue. I might be able to forgive one - but not both.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent site functionality (including mobile) makes it easy and quick to locate and watch scenes.
Scenes have linked categories such as anal, MILF, etc.
Paged scene listing provides complete scene info and provides all functionality for each scene: stream and download the scene, view and download photos, watch scene trailer and BTS footage, link to model info page, link to other scenes featuring a selected linked category, all from the scene listing and without having to jump to a scene detail page.
Can add scene to favourites, rate and leave comments for each scene.
Model index can be sorted and filtered by name and rating and shows number of scenes for model.
Variety of download sizes including 4K, 1080p and 720p HD formats and 480p SD format.
Good download speeds.
Responsive customer service.
Works with download managers.
Includes DogFart network content.
Epoch biller means sign-up is safe and easy.
Cons:
No detailed model info - model page only lists scenes.
Infrequent updates.
4K downloads are charged per scene.
Not all scenes are hardcore.
Live cams sidebar affects page loading performance.
Downloaded video file sizes are excessive for 1080p and 480p content.
Older scenes are listed as HD when they're really only 480p SD.
Download filenames aren't unique so there's a chance you might overwrite a previously downloaded scene.
Can't resume downloads from a previous session.
Bottom Line:
Features 54 scenes featuring US models with content dating back to June 2011 and updating every 3 months.
-Scenes last between 20 and 40 minutes and feature attractive women in hardcore action with one or more BBCs. There's no storyline to speak of, just the girl getting it on with one or more BBC, with some scenes featuring hardcore sex and others just the girl sucking and playing with the BBC. Scenes end with the guy cumming on the girl's feet after a foot job. Some of the hardcore scenes feature anal but not many.
-Scenes are good production quality with decent camera angles, though at 10Mbps encoding for the 1080p content, download file sizes are 25% larger than they need to be. Despite being labelled as such, HD MED and HD SMALL isn't HD at all but is 768x432at bit rates 1500Kbps and 800Kbps, though HD BIG is 1280x720 at 3Mbps which I guess is HD, just not full HD.
-The web site is very functional and quite responsive on both normal and mobile sites. The design of the scene listing/updates page is a departure from the usual convention of lots of scene thumbnails (each with minimum scene info) per page, requiring you to click the thumbnail or scene title to view the scene on a separate scene detail page. Instead this site shows all the scene info with a large scene preview image per scene, with the ability to stream and download the scene, all from the scene listing page, which arguably means less mouse-clicks and waiting for pages to load when you're browsing the content. The trade-off is that there are only 5 scenes per page.
Personally I prefer this design over the usual, as I tend to flick through every page of site updates from start to end, and having a large scene photo plus being able to stream the scene trailer (or the whole scene) at various resolutions is much quicker than otherwise. I also very much like that the list of scene names/models is presented as a drop down list from which you can jump to a selected scene. You can also jump to a specific page number in the scene updates listings by selecting the desired page number from a drop-down list.
You can also filter scenes by one or more categories but this works across the network rather than just this site.
Scenes can be listed by date order or rating order.
-Each scene listing provides complete scene info and provides lots of functionality: add to favourites, stream in-place or in a new window, download scene, stream trailer, watch behind the scenes video, view and download photos, link to other scenes sharing linked categories, link to model info page, rate scene and leave comments - all whilst browsing the scene listing and without having to jump to a scene detail page.
Scene info includes model name/title, release date, rating, duration, complete scene cast, applicable (and linked) categories and scene description/storyline.
-Login sessions last for as long as the browser window is open - if you're downloading scenes and you close your browser (but leave your DL manager open) it's very likely your current and pending downloads will fail. Because a unique session id is part of the site URL, you can't close your browser and resume downloads in a later new login session as the site URL will have changed and the download URL will be invalid, so make sure you finish downloading before closing your browser window/tab that's open on this site.
-Photosets are presented as a gallery or can be downloaded as a ZIP file. The gallery presents pics as a paged list of thumbnails, clicking on one zooms to full page size, from which you can navigate back and forth, open the pic in a new in a new window or - rather amusingly - send the pic to Twitter!
The photos are 3000x2000 resolution though older scenes are 1600x1067.
-Whilst the design of this site is refreshing and fairly responsive, the main negative is the chat sidebar which slows down the loading of each page whilst it links to the DogFart Live camming site, which despite the title, doesn't provide access to DogFart stars.
-Despite the limited content and infrequent updates, I still think this site is worth joining, mainly thanks to the inclusion of much more IR content from Dogfart network, but if you like seeing guys cum on girls feet then you'll enjoy it even more.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ZIP downloads of both 800 and 1600px versions of the galleries offered
+A lot of models
+Star directory with headshots
+There is a model search but it is only accessed on the model directory page
+They have all the picture sets categorized by model, yes, but they also categorize them by magazine issue, going all the way back to their 2001 series.
+Good mix of American and Non-American models
+All updates are archived back to 2004, retaining their addition date (however that date is not displayed on the actual page for the update)
+A little fun addition - feet around the office. A few feet pics every couple of days. This is a leg/feet site.
+Downloads work with download managers
Cons:
-A good portion of the galleries are small...very small
-All images watermarked
-All videos watermarked
-Because LegSex has been around for a while (in magazine form, not so much for the website) they feature girls before their prime, and as such the girls use very old aliases (or other unknown ones). Maxxx=Brooke Stone, Scotti Andrews=Clare, Sheila Rossi=Tina.
-Most models are one-and-done, meaning only one update.
-They have movies, but they are so hard to find. You click the section titled "Move it!". Nope, its not called "videos" or "movies"..."Move it!"
-Downloads have generic file names (scene.wmv, 1600.zip)
-Videos offered only in WMV
-Solo content outnumbers hardcore content by a wide margin
-Update schedule stinks...2-3 updates per week, most are just image updates, not many video updates
-The tour page looks better than the actual members page.
Bottom Line:
Just another porn site...put it that way. Not enough is offered to put it in the same league as DDF Productions' HotLegsAndFeet.
There are some old models on here who I certainly like and were looking for (Sheila aka Tina, Brooke aka Maxxx, Scotti aka Clare, etc.) but the site does not offer much OF THEM. It is one gallery here, one gallery there...and all the galleries are 20 pictures, standard. I think the pictorals are more, but there aren't many pictorals...most galleries are just the pics which were featured in their magazine, in other words, 20 pictures :P.
It says a lot when the TOUR page looks better than the MEMBERS page. The TOUR model directory looks so much better than the MEMBERS model directory.
It also is a pain in the neck that everything is so hard to find. I spend quite some time looking for the movies, briefly going so far as just assuming there were none. Everything is not named properly...Videos section is called "Move it", pictorals are called "Pic-toe-rals". Quit the fancy and just stick with what works.
If you want a Legs and Feet site, stick with HotLegsAndFeet from DDF Productions...its a hell of a lot better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
hot leggy models
intimate situations
models talk to camera
Cons:
Download limit disables your account. They should at least warn you that you are approaching limit.
Limited selection.
Model Tiffany removed and yet she is still shown on the front page (before joining)
Instead of consolidating sites to bring more content for less money, they decided to split off content to multiple sites.
No ZIP files for pics.
Bottom Line:
If you are into intimate videos of leggy women, then this site has some better models.
On the other hand, they are taking a rip off the customer approach with download limits that shutdown customer accounts, and splitting up the content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- tasteful stuff, videos and pictures
- good amount of stuff
- the "right" kinky viewing angles for nerds in pictures and videos
- mostly european-style, well-proportioned models
- site seems to update regularly
Cons:
- videos not in HD, video-quality varies according to release date
- picture resolution varies, not state of the art of today
- picture-sets not as zip-files
- explicit download-limit of 3 GB per day
- defacto download-limit is clearly much less and lesser, you download 10 or 12 videos and your account gets disabled, account then has to get reanimated by sending email to webmaster, this game repeats every day
Bottom Line:
Site has some good approach but needs to strain according to content quality and customer friendlyness.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Unique content for those seeking lots of ass play without looking at any dicks. They get down to business. Kelsey, the main model is reasonably cute.
Cons:
Models numbers are very limited, and other than Kelsey, most are overweight and unattractive. Video composition is poor and shaky. The site has an archaic 3-tiered membership setup where you can buy an only-streaming membership, or a more expensive streaming membership, or just like the 1990's, you buy "tokens" to download. This isn't as simple as logging in and having easy access. When you buy the streaming +downloads membership, it will not allow download managers or downloading more than one video, and the page gets locked up for 5-10 minutes or longer while the one video spools and buffers to load up. The worst thing is all these levels of membership require a secondary authentication when you download - despite the fact that you logged in as a downloading member. The secondary authentication is touchy, and in 3 weeks I was only able to download 3 videos.
Bottom Line:
For an expensive ($40 per month)site, it is slow and frustrating to navigate - and impossible to download videos. For all this money the site should be easier to use, and not full of bugs and lock-ups of the site.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
