Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 57 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Webcam Hackers

26. Webcam Hackers (0)

Pay
Active
70
dracken (246) 10-29-11  04:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Around 50 videos with updates pretty regularly (every 7 days it seems).
- The scenes are supposedly in HD (1250x720), but in my opinion even the HD looks grainy and rather poor quality (I guess it's all part of the webcam look, but to me they took it a step too far with some scenes looking as bad as a live cam strip show)
- As the title suggests this site is all about girls with webcams. Some of them strip in front of said webcam, some get fucked (sadly only one camera angle) and a few masturbate solo.
- They have the same high quality of models the rest of the site has and I believe all "amateurs" on here have scenes on other sites in the network.
- Most scenes have a bit of a story. A girl talks to her boyfriend and strips for him, a foreign exchange student has sex with her boyfriend, etc. Nothing too crazy, but it all stays in the same theme of a webcam hack and it's rather hot.
- Access to the network is included (tons and tons of good sex scenes here.)
Cons: - Like I mentioned above the videos although good resolution are still a bit on the grainy side and several of them have the webcam specific delay, which really makes the scene hard to get into. Also some scenes have serious color issues (when a girl's vagina looks purple something is seriously wrong)
- Some scenes are very short (5 minutes) and there are some scenes that feel like they belong together in one video but were split into two in order to make the site look bigger. (There is one Madison Ivy scene where she masturbates then another scene where has sex in the exact same place).
- The entire network needs a better way to preview videos. Right now their thumbnails are not very clear.
- Some girls are really not that interesting in solo action. There is one scene where a girl pulls on her labia and asks if we can tell which one she pulls on more. Titillating stuff indeed.
Bottom Line: Overall this site suffers from some limitations that are inherent in the type of content it's trying to produce. When you're trying to generate amateur content you pretty much force yourself to have rather poor camera work, only one angle and sometimes awkward interactions (like I mentioned above some girls do well alone with a camera and some are just weird)

Also they have a scene where two girls get into adult diapers and pretend to be sumo wrestlers. I guess that fits the site and it's rather funny, but I'm not sure if it's content that I want to pay 25 bucks for. I guess you have to look at this site as a bonus along with the much, much better sites like Massage Creep and 18 Years Old.

Aside from the sometimes questionable content I would have loved longer scenes. The average video is around 10 minutes with many running under that. Give the girls some more toys and more outfits and there should be no issue making longer videos.

So, we have rather poor action, short scenes and bad camerawork. So far the site manages to fail on every count possible. We do have several hot models, but why bother trying to watch the scenes here when a click away they are showing off with good lighting and multiple camera angles?

Now don't get me wrong, the premise of the site is good, we need more amateur content even if amateur means pornstar paid to masturbate in front of an expert camera crew. But for the love of God don't settle with actual webcam footage. That is never going to look good, it's just a waste of time and money.

Bottom line: the latest updates on here show improvement. Maybe it's just my hopeful optimism but the camera work seems cleaner and they are starting to focus on sex scenes as opposed to solo masturbation. Also the u8pdates are coming regularly and they seem to really want to push this amateur-like content, which is great.

More HD updates, more hot models and longer scenes and we should have a great site with a unique premise. (please no more adult diapers though... there is no need for that.)

P.S. The score reflects mu hope that the site will improve, right now I would not join this network just for the violation series of sites.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Voy Zone

27. Voy Zone (0)

Pay
Newbie
67*
TheMoreYouKnow (4) 06-05-14  07:13am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Update Frequency: Updates Daily

Video Resolution Quality: Fairly decent ranging from 720X576 to 1280X720.

Image Quantity: There are an incredible amount of photos on site.

Subject Matter: Some gorgeous women captured in the available content.
Cons: Image Set Quality: Images are random, not at all visually tied together in a given scene and are by average 4X6” in size, pretty small for a pay site. Also to note many of the images are low res versions from other pay sites, such as BeachVoy.

Overall Business Practice: Incredibly poor due to blatant deception in advertisement in updates and distribution/recycling of material.

Video Quality In Terms of Content: Majority of the videos are in dire need of editing, since many of them have minutes of inactivity.

Price: Way over priced considering the content given quantity and quality of material.
Bottom Line: Before even deciding on investing 30 bucks on a month with Voy-Zone.com, I noticed the “Last Updates” indicated on their non-member main page were all given (current month/year, but no exact date of entry) when hovering over them individually with the mouse. Suspicion ran over me, telling that these images/videos were not really updates at all, rather these images were the same and the dates were automatically set to change with the current month. So I waited till the next month passed and sure enough, the same images stayed on page, but their attached month auto-adjusted to the current month.

Video Count: 462 video clips (some are however repeats).

Despite this blatant deception toward prospective customers, I was still curious what content was held within their site, and thought maybe Voy-Zone’s page intro was simply a by-product a lazy web management and thought perhaps they still held some exclusive fresh content that maybe worth while, so I still forked over my 30 bones to see what’s up.

First impressions… Once joining Voy-Zone.com, and logging in, the site’s main page was completely different, filled with actual updates with complete dates of when they were posted. As to whether this material has been recycled from any previous posts, I would consider to be quite feasible, due to the fact there’s a huge gap of time where no posted material is to be found on site! Strangely enough between September 9, 2011 and February 5, 2014, there was absolutely no material to be found inside their video collection. Also to note, what little material that has been left on site posted in 2011 has been reposted in 2014! With this in mind, it’s an easy guess that periodically material is withdrawn from the site, then probably reposted later in the site in order to keep material fresh as well as keeping customers from downloading the majority of their archive in a month’s membership. Also if you’re more into high quality image sets (i.e. related pics of a particular scene), than movies of beach voyeurism, stay clear from this site, the image “sets” here are pretty much random unconnected pics, by average 4X6” in size, fairly poor in resolution given their from a pay site.

EDITING: Many of the movies are riddled with mouth breather moments, that being many of these 3 plus minute clips contain women on their backs barely fidgeting an inch, all the while they could have simply taken a photo which would’ve consumed hundreds of megabytes less than a video… It’s often a wonder at times to think if these guys ever consider the topic of conceptual editing; meaning if nothing is happening in a half minute or so through a scene, hit the pause button or at least edit it out the inactivity in the material later when the footage has been captured. And these guys definitely have plenty of experience in editing software, since much of the footage has been divided into individual clips in order to increase appearance of having more content, a common practice among voyeur sites.

QUANTITY VS QUALITY: To say that all Voy-Zone films are like the ladder would be unfair, there are some nice gems scattered through out and about 1 out of 10 films are hard drive keeper worthy, at least to my standards not sparing the smiles and womanly curves, while the rest are simply mouth breather fillers kept on site, just so that it would appear their collection is immense in size: mission accomplished. As of June 04, 2014, to my count there were 462 video clips, including some repeated material peppered within the sets.

De ‘Rena, who has distributed content on other sites, actually captures the best material on site, but still at times have moments of stagnant mouth breather scenes, also having tendencies of attention deficit disorder (ADD) moments with the camera shifting away from main subject at hand toward random uninteresting views, then shifting back toward main subject; this probably is due to the lack of activity with subjects not being in motion, but for the viewer (at least to me) these odd shifts get quite annoying, and the answer again to resolve these mouth breather moments and odd off-base subject shift, is that good ol’ fashion pause button, patience, and/or perhaps the use of editing software as well. Also repeated posts of the same material are not uncommon to find.

VOLUME: Also another tip, lowering the volume is quite an effective measure in reducing self-noise which is another annoyance entirely on its own.

RATING SYSTEM: Each page does provide users a means to rate the material, however there is no way to see the accumulation of others' ratings. The accumulation of these ratings apparently determine the “Top 7 Video Sets” of the site, but unfortunately there’s no optional page viewing system given to see material rated from best to worst, which would be an ideal feature as well.

In short, this is a pass due to their price is a bit steep considering the limited quantity of quality movies on site.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Nude in Public

28. Nude in Public (0)

Pay
Active
68
asmith12 (124) 11-20-07  08:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + original idea
+ real girls in nude on real streets
+ creativity (different scenarios and setups)
+ frequent updates
+ quite funny stories behind the shootings
+ rather active community
Cons: - videos are essentially teasers to get you buy full DVDs
- "Latest video update" is a video shot back in 2003
- no full scene videos at all
- almost no translation in videos
- video quality is very questionable (at 600kBit/s it looks like VHS; how do they sell DVDs with such quality?)
- thumbnails are so small that are almost useless
- picture quality is not so good (resolution is up to 1600x1200, but photographer's work is not up to resolution).
- design is a joke
Bottom Line: I like the idea of the site (real nude girls in real city streets and other real public places), but the site has VERY serious deficiencies. The most annoying thing for me was the fact that they're selling the same content twice (charging for it twice). When subscribing to the site, they say "220 Video Clips", but once you're inside you find that videos are just "Free bonus", and essentially are just teasers to get you buy full versions at their DVD shop (xxvideo.com, where videos are sold at $35/90-minute DVD + S&H). Yes, there can be about 220 clips inside, but each clip is mere 2 minutes long, they date back to 2003-2004 and are NOT full videos (DVD versions of the same thing are substantially longer), plus quality is questionable by modern standards to say the least (both resolution and cameraguy work are subpar).

As for pictures - the main annoyance is their ultra-small thumbnails, which makes seeing what's going on almost impossible. Also IMHO this kind of content is much less interesting in pictures than in video.

Bottom line:
Adding FULL videos and sorting out thumbnails could make it an excellent site (especially with such creative guys behind), but at current state I don't see much value in it except for the big fans of this very niche (and even for them buying the same but FULL content from xxvideo.com at $35/DVD could be a better choice).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Public Expose

29. Public Expose (0)

Pay
Active
60
rearadmiral (326) 05-25-11  12:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - $5.95 2-day trial membership with no restrictions
- Bills through CCBill
- Approximately 120 videos
- Multiple video download options
- Some attractive models
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Mediocre quality videos
- Videos are all short duration
- Very small photo sets
- No photo zips available
- Small site
- Not part of any network to improve value
- No known models (to me, anyway)
- No updates since January 2010
Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of public nudity and I’m always looking for sites with good material. Unfortunately, Public Expose isn’t one of the better ones I’ve seen. It’s small, with only about 120 videos. The TBP review says that there are 148 videos, and it is correct that there are 148 videos on the site, but for some reason, there are many duplicate videos that even use the same name. There are approximately 120 unique videos here.

Having access to 120 public nudity videos shouldn’t be anything to complain about, but these videos are all quite short. They range in length from under one minute to just over five minutes. Most of the videos follow the same format in that an Eastern European woman is seen in some sort of an outdoor setting (fully dressed) and she flashes for the camera. If full nudity exists on this site, I’ve yet to see it. There are several scenes of two women flashing and making out a bit.

This may be subjective, but I found the scenes to be almost un-erotic: the models are mostly shy about flashing and many of the shoots are simply outdoors near other people. When I contrast some of the Eastern European public shoots available on ALS Scan and Public Disgrace, those on Public Expose come off looking pretty shabby. Certainly the women on Public Expose aren’t bad looking, but they aren’t great either. I don’t follow many Eastern European models, but I still didn’t recognize any of them.

Technically, the site was probably average when it was started several years ago, but it is well below what the average porn customer would expect today. Video resolution is quite low. It varies depending on which type of file you want and ranges from a low of 320x240 for a very low-res mpeg4 to ‘high’ of 720x540 (at 128kb/s) for a DivX avi file. I downloaded the DivX files simply assuming that since they were the largest they’d give the best quality, but if this is the best, it isn’t very good.

There are photos available, but the photo sets are very small – less than two dozen pics in some cases. That may be good news, though, when you learn that there is no zip option available.

If there is any good news about this site, it’s that they have a full trial available for just $5.95. Given that there are only 120-ish small videos on the site anyone with a half-decent internet connection can download every video in the five day trial period. And further taking from the value is that the site hasn’t updated in over a year.

Unless you’re a huge fan of public nudity and want to add this notch to your belt, I’d avoid it. It isn’t a bad value at the trial price if you go in with your eyes open and realize that you don’t get much for that fee. Just remember to cancel your membership before the trial ends.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Public Flash

30. Public Flash (0)

Pay
Active
70
exotics4me (463) 04-19-07  08:03pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Flashing looks to be 100% real and in locations that I have seen in person.
- Some of the girls are really cute, some are pretty, some are average.
- Models walk up to strangers and talk to them while flashing.
- Everything is average quality or better, pics and vids
Cons: - There really isn't a whole lot to see on here
- Extreme softcore, very little touching, just quick flash, stop, start over.
- Person videoing talks through the whole thing
- 3rd party content wasn't interesting either
Bottom Line: I've always been intrigued by exhibitionism and voyeurism, and had saw some samples from this site. I was expecting much more. The samples I saw were the most hardcore parts of the site, and those were even tame. I only downloaded maybe 4 of the girls' videos and pictures, but have never went back to them since downloading them. I would rate it lower, but it does say public flash, not public sex or public masturbation. It just left a lot to be desired for me. If they added maybe 1-2 more clips furthering the tease, then it would rate higher.

My best way to describe my feelings towards the site would be to say I feel like I was in a gym with nothing but women and I walked into the dressing room only to get the door slammed in my face at the last minute!

Definitely need more content and more skin for me and more touching. To put it plainly, it is a very vanilla site. Not recommended if you are wanting more than just basic flashing.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Public Flash

31. Public Flash (0)

Pay
Active
84
mbaya (356) 08-08-08  11:04am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Newer videos 720x480, many older ones 640x480.
-Nice archive, presently 117 video shoots.
-Many natural, attractive girls who seem to really enjoy flashing. Most of them are very enthusiastic.
-Attractive price through the link from TBP.
-Member forum. Provides news about future updates and you can post suggestions and comments.
Cons: -Many videos do not have photo shoots and many photo shoots do not have videos.
-Videos do not have a link to download the entire video at once. In the member forum the webmaster recently promised to add a link.
-Updates may take as long as two weeks for an entire shoot. Updates a few clips at a time.
-Photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file. Many photos poor quality. Apparantly not adding new photo shoots.
-May not be all exclusive as the main photographer has videos on other flashing websites.
-Bonus sites streaming only with poor quality videos.
Bottom Line: Most of the videos were a lot of fun and better than I expected. I counted three with oral sex and a few with a little masturbation, so not only skin. A lot of the videos were quite explicit. A variety of races and ethnicities as well as body types, although most were thin. Most appear to be amateurs, although the shoot of Hannah Hilton was good. I would definitely sign up again in a few months.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit X Nudism

32. X Nudism (0)

Pay
Newbie
87*
El Nino (3) 02-02-10  05:34pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - I like the site. I am a really big fan of porn that isn't shot in the studio and is more of girls just having fun by themselves - way hotter!
- There currently 81 pages of girls just posing and having fun WHILE NAKED!
- If there is a picture you like you are able to click on it to look at that particular one.
- TONS OF PICTURES
Cons: - It is kind of a pain to just keep scrolling down and clicking on the next page
- Nothing really happens when you are searching for keywords
- Repetitive, its a lot of the same types of pictures, girls taking pictures of themselves in the mirror WHILE USING THE FLASH...REALLY ANNOYING
- Not much to the site, pretty basic forum style website that incorporates girls being naked
Bottom Line: All in all its a pretty good site. I personally like these types of pictures because its the natural girls being sexy by themselves. It does get a little annoying with the flash issue but I can look over that. There are some pretty sexy girls on this site while others are ok.

Final word: I would go back again
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Newbie Nudes

33. Newbie Nudes (0)

Pay
Newbie
84*
Kensington Gore (1) 10-19-09  05:39pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Devoted community that genuinely enjoys the amateur porn scene.

- Clean,vibrant layout that makes it easy to navigate.

- Plenty of categorises which are being added to,refined and improved constantly.

- Low tolerence of scammers and fakes.

- Friendly moderation set up in chat rooms,no tolerence for abusive behaviour therein.

- Some truly erotic and down right dirty pictures can be found on this site so it has something for everyone.

- Growing collection of user submitted videos.
Cons:
- Forums can get rather wild with a minority spoiling an otherwise fun place.

- Obviously fake web porn pictures tend to crop up now and again.

- Voting system may need some modification or even removal for something less contentious.
Bottom Line: You will be drawn in by the sheer wanton abandon of user sexual exploits in NN.
In both picture and video form and give it some time and you will also be taking part in a well established "wild" but otherwise friendly community.

Chat rooms are also another place where you will have the opportunity to become more closely involved with the community,which offers more than just amateur erotica...but let's not pretend that's great all by itself ;)

All I would say is if NN could sort out the niggles like the more erratic happenings in the forum and the upset about the voting system this place can and will grow into something of a gold standard for Amateur Erotic websites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exhibitionist Paradise

34. Exhibitionist Paradise (0)

Pay
Active
81
Bacchus (30) 01-11-07  06:36pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: *Plenty of amateur content.
*Amateur content is very amateur and has plenty of couples to choose from.
*Despite some video quality issues, the couples are very believable.
*Majority of videos are thumbnailed to prevent undesirable content.
Cons: *Updates are rare.
*Some video quality is poor.
*Archived material is not thumbnailed making it frustrating if you do not want to see three hundred pound amateurs having sex.
Bottom Line: EP has the potential to being a very entertaining amateur website. The quality of videos from their contri's needs to be scrutinized more and bad quality video needs to be rejected and video you can actually see and understand should be accepted.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit British Doggers

35. British Doggers (0)

Pay
Active
55
bacardiancoke (22) 02-17-09  07:19am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Features outdoor activities.
Cons: - Non exclusive content
- "British" is inaccurate in nearly all sets.
- It isn't actually about dogging!!!!
- I don't expect a site to which I am giving money to have ads!
- They are recycling their own content from 4 years ago.
- Poor pic and vid quality.
- Appaling site layout and navigation.
Bottom Line: Before now I have been able to offer a fairly balanced view of porn sites and have points of merit as well as critique. With British Doggers though, disappointed doesn't even begin to describe my experience.

So, I'll start with the positives. It is a site that features outdoor activities of others.

Previously being a member of this site, I decided to pay it a re-visit to see what the modern content looks like.

And......... it's exactly the same content that I saw 4 years ago recycled.

It is not actually about dogging (I would recommend that the site creators take a look at just what dogging is, or look to Killergram for tips.)

It is recycling content from the turn of the century (and some looks like it is from before.)

The bottom line - it is the first site that I have ever subscribed to where I have cancelled my subscription on the same evening.

This content was fresh in 2004 - maybe it is time that British Doggers closed its doors for good?

If you are looking for dogging in the meantime then I'd recommend that you look elsewhere, you won't find it here.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Voyeur Realm

36. Voyeur Realm (0)

Pay
Active
65
mbaya (356) 01-14-09  08:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-Full access trial that also includes full access to nudesportvideo.com
-Weekly updates, over 300 short videos.
-Russian girls that look like amateur, girl next door types. Little or no makeup.
-No dialog, no interviews, nothing spoken.
Cons: -Too many very skinny girls. I don't want to see ribcages.
-Need more variety of body types and ages.
-Not really voyeur. Obviously staged. This can be a plus-see below.
-Many videos poorly photographed. This is common for this genre, but it is not erotic.
-Often have cheesy background music.
Bottom Line: It is transparent that these are not genuine voyeur videos. This is a minus if you care about truth in advertising, but to me this is a plus. I prefer that a girl's privacy was not invaded. More importantly, the girls here play up to the camera. There is a lot of explicit nudity and an attempt at teasing. There are also clips of upskirt, panty teasing, stripping, under table, etc. Unfortunately too many videos are just weak and basically don't work. Like so much in porn, a good concept, but the execution just isn't that good. I kept only 6 videos of the more than 300.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bikini Voyeur

37. Bikini Voyeur (0)

Pay
Newbie
92*
richard (3) 05-22-07  04:15pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: Some good quality, FULL LENGTH bikini and wet t shirt contests
Large collection of beach videos
Good collections of photos
Cons: No longer seem to update downloadable videos
Bottom Line: The only thing wrong with this site is that they no longer seem to update with new videos that you can download.
On the positive side, what is there is fantastic. There are 40+ good wet t shirt contests, and a good dozen or so bikini contests (well, at least they start in bikini's). These are also FULL LENGTH videos (some up to 30 minutes in length!) with nothing left to the imagination (and all fully downloadable). Great quality and camera angles for the best view in the house.
There is also a large photo collection of these and other contests, and photos from beaches around the world.
I would recommend this site to anyone!! Join for a month, download the full length videos and enjoy.
The only thing that stops this site from getting 100 is the fact that they no longer seem to update video clips that you can download. The have gone to video streaming, which isn't that good when the internet connection connot keep up, and these clips are only part of a whole contest.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Home Spy Video

38. Home Spy Video (0)

Pay
Active
74
Bacchus (30) 01-27-07  01:27pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: *Tons of video pages to sift through
*Almost the entire site is hard core
*Voyeur section available
*No hassle streaming videos
*No DRM
Cons: *There is absolutely no content categories.
*Userid/password tends to get kicked back on occasion
*Some content quality is below average or even poor
*Screen shots do not always depict what you are downloading
Bottom Line: If you are looking for improving your amateur library and want quick short hardcore clips, then homespy video is for you. There is an attempt at putting the videos into categories but they don't tell you what they are in. You just start noticing certain chunks of videos all being in the same niche which can be irritating. Quality of videos can suffer as well and some are not even viewable but the content is there and the majority of the videos are solid.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Beach Hunters

39. Beach Hunters (0)

Pay
Active
77
Tom929384600 (5) 04-05-08  05:19pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A lot of nice voyeur videos from (russian?) beaches
- Navigation is ok and easy to check
- Trial available
- multi filetype support
- some videos are high definition
Cons: - some videos are realy bad quality or wiggly
- increased amount of FAKE voyeur videos found in last months
- most "video episodes" are discontiguous :(
- very rare closeups scenes
Bottom Line: if you like couples or naked women and men on beaches doing nasty things you will love beachhunters!

The amount of videos (seperated in several categories like "sex on the beach" or "topless") is huge and there are even HD videos available.

Good is that there are several oppotunities of downloading the files in different filesizes and formats.

Not so good is that there are no or very rare closeups videos or scenes :(

Even if the most beachhunters videos are REAL i have noticed that they upload a non irrelevant amount of FAKE VIDEOS that are staged and NOT real voyeur! Thats why i have to diminish my rating from 80 to 77.

In general beachhunters is absolutely worth a look for everyone who is in voyeur videos!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Beach Hunters

40. Beach Hunters (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
TheMoreYouKnow (4) 07-02-14  03:02pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Updated: 07-02-14  03:11pm  (Update History)
Reason: Thought score maybe a bit too low, weighing the quantity of the material that the site has to offer.
Pros: Content Quantity. As of July, 2014 Beach Hunters indicates to non-members of amassing well over 3,600 "full-size” video clips. Now that may sound a lot, but take in account these videos are in 3 different formats (avi, mpg, mp4, wmv) counted as separate videos.

Content Categories. Videos and photos are set in categories so that members can easily find material to their preference. Categories are as follows: sex on the beach, foreplay, nudism topless, change room, not straight.

Content Variety. Every body form imaginable, age (within legal limits of course) and sexual orientation is captured on site. Beachhunters' videographers seem to have no scruples on what they capture on the beach; skinny, curvy, wrinkly, morbidly obese, it's all here.
Cons: Photos. Photos are very poor quality screen shots.

Editing. Many clips contain 3 plus minute of no activity, where the subjects are on their backs barely moving an inch. A great deal of editing could be used in the majority of their videos for the lack of activity as well as shaky hands syndrome, however Beachhunters seem to opt in using their editing talents into chunking up their videos in order to extend their library quantity, with no consideration given to their quality. Sadly this seems to be a common practice among these type of voyeur sites.

Sound. Videographers don't seem to be aware of the concept of self-noise, meaning when they move their equipment, it gets fairly loud. Do they know where the volume switch is on their equipment?

Recycling. Currently outside from membership access, I have visited their site to see if they in they had any fresh material worth to join up again and have noticed from their latest screen shots, they are reposting material from years ago!
Bottom Line: If you're into photos and not much into videos, don't bother with this site. However despite the site's extremely poor edited content, they do have plenty of material for at least one month's membership, however due to its recycling of content, I wouldn't go further than that or ever consider going back again.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit I Love The Beach

41. I Love The Beach (0)

Pay
Newbie
93*
LORKIN (3) 01-17-09  05:47am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - HD clips
- A lot of bigtitted women. And it's all natural of course (with a few exceptions).
- Some of the women there are better looking than pornstars or supermodels. Incredible!
Cons: - If it had hardcore too, it would be the best site in the world.
- I'm not sure, but is it really legal to view that?
Bottom Line: Fantastic women, topless on sunny beaches. Just like Heaven on Earth.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit I Love The Beach

42. I Love The Beach (0)

Pay
Newbie
88*
TheMoreYouKnow (4) 06-05-14  07:35am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Updated: 06-05-14  02:35pm  (Update History)
Reason: With a reflective comparison to other voyeur beach sites. A higher score just seemed more reasonable.
Pros: Excellent amount of videos containing some gorgeous women.

Some decent quality in HD videos in their more recent years.

They do not recycle their content.

Great quality in pic resolution, offering true sets.
Cons: Sone of their real old videos (plus 5 years or so) are so tiny, makes one wonder, "Why bother?"

I think in their advertisements, they're really underselling in the amount of nude material available on site.
Bottom Line: I have an affinity for voyeur sites, and from my experience. These guys are the best out there. Worth the money.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit I Love The Beach

43. I Love The Beach (0)

Pay
Newbie
95*
David19 (4) 09-01-14  02:30am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: This site does a pretty good job providing photos and videos of women's breasts from various topless and nude beaches around the world. The photography is apparently candid although I have heard differing views of whether some of the women may actually be professional models. Whatever the situation, the photos and videos tend to be of much higher quality than I've seen on similar sites. They do a good job of doing close-ups of the women's breasts, and also have some really good videos of women walking on the beach. All breast sizes are featured, although there is perhaps a slight bias towards larger breasts. They've also added some new features recently, including an ability to rate galleries and videos and a ranking of the most popular photos and videos.
Cons: There is not any hardcore material on the site--it is strictly softcore. Although there is some totally nude material, I find the topless materical to be of higher quality. Also it would be nice if there was more material showing couples canoodling on the beach. Even if they are not actually having sex, showing a nearly nude couple enjoying themselves together allows one to imagine what it might be like watching them having sex--and I'd like to see more of that. There are too many women alone or with girlfriends and not enough with men.
Bottom Line: Overall the basic premise of the site is to use women who happen to be topless or nude on beaches as candid models for a softcore porn site. The women have definitely consented to be topless in a public place, but not necessarily to be photographed--but given the public setting the photography is legal. Generally speaking I consider this to one of the best sites in its genre out there. Many beach voyeur sites seem to be of very low quality, but this one does a great job of portraying the women shown on it in a sexually provocative manner.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit They Didn\'t Know

44. They Didn't Know (0)

Pay
Active
53
lk2fireone (194) 03-31-11  03:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Multiple choices for downloading a video: High, medium, or low quality.
But the quality of the "high quality" video is not very good.
-Content is dated.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy login.
-Very easy switching between network sites (Do not need to re-enter your login information, just click on a hot link).
-Long time before site timeout.
Cons: -Archive site. Last update was 2009-02-07.
-Small site.
-Models are not named in the videos.
-No model bios.
-Default filename for downloading videos is "high", "medium", or "low",
for high, medium or low quality selection. So have to manually rename videos for sorting or saving.
-But that's not a big problem, because due to low quality of even the "high" quality videos, who wants to save these videos anyway? The models
in the videos are not named, the videos are poor quality (in terms of erotic quality and video technique). I'm watching one video with a guy and
a girl, and it's not until 4 minutes after the video starts that you can easily see the face of the girl. Until then, the heads of both the guy and the girl are mainly cut out of the frame, and it's not until the 4 minute mark, when the girl drops to her knees to give the guy a blow job, that you can clearly see the girl's face.

CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION
Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED:
-The site design has a hot link for each video, named: "Watch Picture Gallery", which is what the site calls the photoset. But every video link that I clicked on to see the "Watch Picture Gallery" led to a Picture Gallery with no pictures. So I do not think this site has any photosets. Which is OK, because I was expecting the photosets to be low quality anyway, based on the rest of the network offerings for photosets.
-Videos are supposed to be viewable in flash stream. But some links to watch the video in flash stream don't work. I kept waiting for minutes for some videos to load and play, but all they did was keep loading, without playing.
Again, this is not a big problem, because I was just testing the site to be able to write this review, and I already decided the site was basically worthless. If I had really wanted to watch these videos, I might have been frustrated.
-Slow download speeds. This is the first site in the network where I did not get my maximum download speed. Instead, I was often getting about one-half of my maximum download speed of 620-630 KB/s.

BOTTOM LINE:
The site theme is voyeur porn. The girls and couples are supposedly unaware they are being captured on film. So if that idea/niche turns you
on, maybe you will get extra satisfaction from the videos. I would prefer videos that are erotic, or well shot.
Because these are supposed to be voyeur videos, many of them show the girl apparently in the distance. She is only a small part of the frame. So you often don't see her close-up, in good detail. I guess this is supposed to add to the voyeur-sexiness of the filming, but I would prefer to see the standard closeup of the girl, where I can clearly see her face and body, instead of seeing some person in the fucking distance.
These are really cheaply made videos. Most of the videos are shot with the model by herself or with a guy, in a car, at a lake or meadow. The choice of shooting the model in a car makes for lousy camera angles, terrible framing of the girl (head or other body parts often cut out of the picture). Or the car seat or roof blocks your view of the girl. The lake and meadow locations are very windy, so there's a lot of microphone noise. Controlling lighting for an outdoor scene is more difficult than for an indoor scene. The girl's face and body goes in and out of shadow constantly, so you don't get a really clear view of the girl.
Video specs:
High quality:
Frame width x height: 1280x720
Total bitrate: 4320 kbps
The bitrate is very high, and would support high definition video. But I would classify these videos as "crap" videos. Pardon the French. Lousy
video technique. Not naming the models in the videos. Minimal erotic appeal.
Number of videos at site: 44
Videos run from 5 minutes to about 17 minutes.
-Bottom line: the site can be considered a bonus site as part of your Teen
Mega World network. But the site itself has little value. It would be better if they just eliminated the site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Voyeur Tan

45. Voyeur Tan (0)

Pay
Active
79
Getreal (Disabled) 12-06-07  12:47pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Unique exclusive content
Fair amount of Content
Decent looking amateur models
Pictures and videos
update 1 time each week
Cons: Needs more content
Low quality videos and pictures
Priced a bit too high
Bottom Line: If you are really into the Tanning bed fetish then it may be worth a shot. I really think this is more of a $15 - $19.00 per month site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Voyeur Tan

46. Voyeur Tan (0)

Pay
Active
62
RagingBuddhist (63) 09-24-09  10:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Unique, exclusive content
+ wmv files offered in three resolutions - 176x144 @ 96k/bs, 320x240 @ 351 kb/s and 640x480 @ 763 kb/s
+ 31 weeks of content at the time of this review
+ easy navigation (see cons)
+ $19.95 for rebills (see cons)
Cons: - only one update a week, consisting of two tanning bed shots and either one shower or one peeing scene
- from *one* to ten pictures of each set and they're video screenshots of the medium resolution video
- at some point, content must be rotated out (see botton line)
- navigation is easy because there's not much to navigate to
- some scenes are non-nude
- watermark is large and distracting
- $24.95 a month is high for what's here and $19.95 is steep for a month's worth of updates
Bottom Line: I wish there was a way to wrap this site up better. What some might consider a pro, doesn't strike me as either a pro or a con. Along with the 31 weeks of updates, there are 3 pages of "old style content", meaning before they got a higher resolution zoom camera. But each page is only 3 scenes with 10 screenshots of each scene. There are also 4 pages "blow job cam", 1 "sex cam" and 1 "hand job cam", each with the accompanying screenshots. Even with all that, this site is, at best, a one-shot join. A month's updates amounts to only 12 scenes, averaging 8-9 minutes each, per month - maybe 15 scenes if you join at the right time of the month, as they update every Monday. I don't see that as $20 option either

The possible rotation of content is a curiosity. I know I've seen scenes in the flash sites that aren't offered here, but nothing has rotated out while I've been a member. I'm also pretty sure they've done more than the 9 episodes of "old style content" that's online - but where are they?

I'm pretty sure this is all staged, which really isn't too much of a bother for me, but a few eye contacts among the scenes kinda killed the fantasy a bit.

Taken directly from their FAQs:
**********************************
Question - Why does your site look so unprofessional or plain compared to others?
Answer - This is not my specialty. I just do this on the side. This is not a big production company producing allot of fake content. I mostly work with Photography. I am not a professional web site designer. But 96% of my members are happy with the content. If you are one of the 4% that is unhappy then go get a life because you may never be happy. Sucks to be you! All this came by accident when I seen how many girls wanted to lay in the tanning bed. So that is when the hidden camera idea cross my mind. In time I have made very many improvements to the camera position and quality.

Warning! Stupid questions will go unanswered.
**********************************
All in all, I think this is just another low maintenance, money maker for the people running the site. A unique little niche that's "just there" if you want to see what they have.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Beach Voy

47. Beach Voy (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
TheMoreYouKnow (4) 06-05-14  02:16pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Excellent high-resolution photo sets of gorgeous women.

Predominately Nude.

Mostly exclusive content.
Cons: Has not updated in years.

No Zip Files.

Not many videos.
Bottom Line: This is an image site. Don't bother to put any money down if you're here for the videos, because they're fairly sparse in quantity. Definitely worth at least one month's membership. Wouldn't bother for 2.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sneaky Peeks

48. Sneaky Peeks (0)

Pay
Active
74
WeeWillyWinky (88) 09-01-07  08:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Nifty idea.
- Zip files for pics, which is the only way to go with these kind of pics.
- Videos are of good quality.
- Updated regularly.
Cons: - Small amount of content for the price.
- Vids stick to the core idea but are repetitive and tend to be boring.

- BACK OF SOME GUY'S HEAD IN A LOT OF THE PICS.

- Minimal acting and/or improvisational skills.
- Some REALLY bad boob-jobs.
Bottom Line: I enjoyed two of this company's other sites, Panty Maniacs and Panty Amateurs, and so I thought I'd give this a try. It's not nearly as good as those other sites, but it has potential.

The picture sets are shot in a frame-by-frame style which unfortunately means most of the pics are redundant. They have the look and feel of high-quality vid-caps. Only voyeur and/or panty afficianados need apply. There is some nudity but not much. And too many implants.

Someone had the "brilliant" idea of placing some guy's noggin in many of the photos, which is supposed to enhance the voyeuristic feel of the sets. This is a gigantically BAD idea. Since when did peeping become a team sport? I don't want to look over another guy's shoulder to get a glimpse of some cutie in her unmentionables, nor do I wish to have said unmentionables obscured by a large male cranium which always makes me think of Shaun of the Dead. Tell Shaun to take a hike and I'll hold the cyber door open, thanks.

As for the vids: the quality is very good and looks decent full-screen on my 22 inch monitor. But, I wish these girls would have something to do in the bathroom rather than stand around gazing into the mirror or off into space. I don't mean watersports or anything like that, I mean, give them a task. Let them do something. Most of the time the girls look bored and are overly conscious of the camera. I wind up embarrassed for THEM when I'm supposed to be ashamed of MYSELF.

Some good fun here regardless.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pantyhose Peepers

49. Pantyhose Peepers (0)

Pay
Active
90
Marianna (Disabled) 06-10-07  05:43am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: * multiple videos formats
* photos in zip format
* zipped videos
* fast downloading
* exclusive content
* bonus 4 sites access
* good price
* bonus feeds
* good customers support
Cons: * videos quality could be better
* some photos quality is average
* site design needs improvement
* hard to navigate
* more models would be good
Bottom Line: a great site with lots of content to download.
photos and videos are zipped making downloading very easy. bonus feeds and fast downloading will make u happy but sites design and hard navigation will bring u down.
content is exclusive, models look very good and customers support is very helpful.
when u join u will get access to 4 more bonus websites for free which will keep u busy for a while!
try it if it catches your eye!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pantyhose Peepers

50. Pantyhose Peepers (0)

Pay
Active
94
roseman (253) 04-15-07  03:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of content available for download.
- Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format.
- Videos are zipped and you can download them easily.
- Website design is pretty cool and navigation is quite easy.
- Downloading was pretty fast for me.
- Bonus sites access (4).
- Bonus content.
- Member's support e-mail.
- Inexpensive (for what you get in total).
- Site has it's own personality.
Cons: - Would prefer some more models.
- Some photos and videos quality could be better.
- Wish they could give access to all of their sites.
Bottom Line: A very good adult website that can definitely confirm the phrase '' A site that worths my money ''. Good work.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 57 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Upskirt Times (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.2 seconds.