Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Maybe 11 videos and 78 photo sets of various quality (mostly really bad stuff, videos are around 320x240 and images are around 768px × 1,024px)
- They have zipped images and some hardcore action, some stripping, all outdoors
- The site came bundled in a network deal so I guess I didn't technically spend money on this particular site.
- Navigation worked okayish most of the time and the whole using the site experience was adequate (downloads worked, I didn't get kicked out suddenly and the links worked)
Cons:
- Very few videos and few images. To make things worse the quality of most images and all videos is very poor. The scenes have inadequate lighting and for the most part mediocre camera work.
- No diverse options when downloading size or quality wise. In fact, overall the site looks like it was made 10-15 years ago and never updated the technical side
- Some sets look recycled from the '70 some look like they belong on a different network (I swear I saw a bangbus set on here) I don't think there is anything remarkable or interesting about the content, it seems all non -exclusive image sets from diverse places and poor quality clips.
- Nothing British about the models, no apparent rhyme or reason to the scenes. No modes page or way to easily browse the scenes.
- They have adds for other sites in the members section
- While they do daily updates it looks like they simply recycle content, the newer content looks just as bad as the old, with no foreseeable improvement.
Bottom Line:
I don't know what you're interested in but this site doesn't have it, trust me you're probably better off with a Google image search. I have seen preview pages for some sites that were way more impressive than the members section of this site. Why? Well let's take a quick tour
The video section is a joke, 11 scenes at 320x 240 resolution with very, very generic porn action. Even more interesting the oldest video is from august this year and the most recent is from September, combined with the fact that all scenes look like they were filmed before digital cameras were invented it's pretty obvious they are recycling content.
The photo section is a bit better, we have around 80 sets with anywhere between 20 to 100 images each. Some look like behind the scene photos (the girl smiles next to a guy with a flaccid penis) some look like screengrabs from a hardcore movie and the rest look like old discolored photos you might find in your dad's collection.
The action in the scene is all over the place, there are some scenes where the girls don't even take their clothes off, some DP, some stripping outdoors, some dildo... overall a hodgepodge that doesn't make any sense. You have anything here from Hillary Scott deepthroating a dude to stuff that would maybe be at home on Met-art if they decided to give up on good quality, HD photos.
So the content is poor, the quality of the images and video is bad,the website navigates like an amateur project put together by someone with minimal HTML knowledge. There is no way to find specific categories of action or particular models, to get to the scenes you have to click the images, but not the texts, although they are links as well. Oh and don't even bother with streaming the videos, of navigating the images with their image browser that is also a joke and will break on you.
Overall there is nothing here that redeems the site. I got it as a special deal when I joined a network and was just impressed at the poor quality. If I had paid to be here I would demand my money back, it's simply a poor site. Maybe the sites they offer as bonus are better (I didn't check those out so maybe those are awesome and worth it... but I doubt it.)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice discount for joining through TBP.
-Nice balance of attractive models of all ethnicities, ages and body types.
-Constantly adding new clips. About an entire video per week.
-A very large archive at 205 videos.
-Some pornstars. Besides those that Rearadmirable recognized there is a great scene with one of my favorites, Laurie Vargas. She started in porn scenes three years before she appeared here and Amber Rayne one year before she appeared here. Neither has this sites videos listed in their video histories that I read about online.
Cons:
-All videos come as clips only. There should be an option for downloading the entire video.
-Low quality non zipdownloadable photos.
-Many older videos are of such low quality that they are not worth downloading.
Bottom Line:
Thanks to Rearadmiral's review I decided to go back to this site. His review is a very complete and accurate description, so I will try to avoid repeating what he said. I was last a member in August 2008. I liked the content, but the videos were not up to the quality I wanted. On an HD screen they were quite grainy.
Since March of 2010, the newest videos are shot in 1280x720, 4220kbps. Those are the specs for HD, but they aren't very sharp. There is a poll question on the site about an upgrade to 1920x1080. They have upgraded the older videos, but they could be much better.
What I really like here is the sense of fun on the site. The camera woman Kyndra, or Special K as she also calls herself, is unabashedly a lesbian and loves her work. She makes her models feel sexy by continuously complimenting them throughout the videos. Her style is much more that of a facilitator than of a director. She doesn't really tell the models what to do; she suggests in a way that makes them feel that they are daringly having naughty, exhilirating fun. They seem to get a natural high, a special thrill from showing off. The level of joking, smiling and laughing makes the site stand out from other flash sites. She makes them want to ever do more by continuously interacting with them. You get the feel that the two are having a conversation. The danger is that sometimes Kyndra is at the point of saying too much. A blabby camerawoman can get as dull as any blabby cameraman. However, she generally seems to say just enough to make the videos a hot experience for us viewers.
The videos range from flashing in secluded locations to opening up in front of total strangers who give their consent. Sometimes the models enter into work locations such as repair shops, stores , etc. The lighting there can be hit or miss. I feel that most of the best videos are shot outdoors. While there is a lot to be said about the daring spontaneous nature of the content, you also have some downsides. Lighting may prevent the viewer from getting details in closeups and sometimes the camerawork is a bit of a drawback. Kyndra is holding the camera in her hands, not a stationary tripod. The videos reflect her being unsteady, especially if she gets enthusiastic or nervous about getting caught. Flashing in public is illegal, as I am sure you know. . This leads to too much camera movement with not enough focus. Sometimes there is a lot of wasted video until a good location is found, so you may find yourself fast forwarding a bit.
As far as the photos, most are not at all related to the videos. As best as I can tell, none have been added since I was a member over two years ago and the lack of quality is evident. They are not zipdownloadable and come in at about 600x800.
My general impression is that the site is REAL reality television at its best. These videos surely beat the usual garbage that gets that title. At the TBP discounted price it definitely is worth a membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Among the best in the niche
- Mostly amateurs with a few well-known porn stars
- Updates regularly
- Exclusive content with U.S. flashing
- Some European flashing (which likely isn’t exclusive)
- Wide variety of body types, from full-figured, to large-breasted to petite
- Some variation in race and age, though most are younger white models
- Two options for file size
- Currently 105 full scenes
- Pictures available
- Excellent value for price ($14.95 USD per month)
Cons:
- Videos broken down into smaller segments
- No option to download complete videos
- Some models are a bit too tame
- Highest resolution video isn’t up current standards (the best is now 1280x720 which compares well to the older videos at 630x470)
- Pictures not available in zip format
- Picture resolution is average (1024x768)
- Site isn’t well organized
Bottom Line:
I’m a big fan of public flashing and nudity and there are few sites that do it like I like it. There are sites that offer European public nudity that offer more videos and are better organized, and there are sites that have American public nudity that are more risqué (Nude in L.A. comes to mind). This is a personal opinion, but those sites lack or don’t show the models being nervous and excited at the same time. Those sites treat public nudity as being an everyday occurrence. Not so with Public Flash. This site has a bit of a corny set-up for each and then moves into various open or public venues. Panties and bras are slipped off and then the model walks through various locations and flashes. Full nudity happens, but is rare. This may sound simple, and it is, but for fans of public flashing and nudity this is a site worth looking at.
As for the models, there is a decent variety. Most fit the typical porn mold by being young (18-25) white and petite. But there are some models who are fuller-figured, larger-breasted, older or different skin tones. Most of the models are amateurs (or at least that I haven’t seen before) but there are a few big name porn stars who appear, presumably early in their careers. This includes Aubrey Addams, Amber Rayne and Faye Runaway.
The site, like the models, is fairly amateur. Searching isn’t really an option, but since each segment has a big thumbnail you can see whether that model might be to your liking on the main page before you click the link. My biggest complaint is that there are no full length videos: each of the scenes is divided up into smaller segments. I realize why they do this for updating purposes, but once all the segments are posted I wish they’d offer a link for the full video.
The videos are offered in two resolutions, but only in wmv format. The best format isn’t bad, but it isn’t HD. The current best is 1280x720, though older videos haven't been updated and are still at 630x470. There are pictures available too, but they are not available in a zip format for easy capture.
Updates are fairly regular – appearing every few days – but each update is only two segments of the full video. It takes a couple of weeks for an entire video to be posted.
Still, for all the flaws, I’m willing to cut this site some slack. I may be wrong, but I suspect that this is one of the hardest niches to work in due to the risk. This isn’t filming sex in the back of a panel van or on a set in someone’s living room: these scenes put the models and crew at some legal risk in our Puritanical culture. The outcome is some fun video to watch as nervous young women flash in public.
This site offers decent value for the monthly fee if you like this niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Indian Hidden Cams promises that once you’re within the membership area of their website you are going to get private shoot indian voyeur videos of the most intimate actions of naughty indian couples caught on film. Tour page shows what they got and as an indian porn lover i just cant wait to go into members area.
Last time i been to this site 1 and half year back and now its totaly change website huge archive of pure indian hidden cam videos. Into is good some exciting nice clip as preview which makes me horny and i got craving to get into members area once agian after long time.
Members Area is very nice now compare to what 2 years back. Professionaly designed and i think control by any content manegement system.
- 572 Indian Voyeur Video
- 400 Bonus content white stuff but very good..
- Updates log are now available which is good
- Video run time now available which is good
- Comment option is available so i can write...
- Nice quality videos. Atleast Pure INDIAN...
Cons:
hmm this is hard part....
No multi format video download. Only 1 option.
The quality of the videos varies quite a bit and there are several different formats. You'll find some great-quality Windows Media files and you'll also come across some MPEGs, AVI files and even some Flash files that aren't quite as impressive. One thing about hidden-cam sites is that you're usually dealing with lower-quality stuff, but the poor quality of some of the clips actually helps with the realism of the content.
Download speed needs to be little slow i can say... but ok...
Couples now need HD camera if they shooting their own sex video so atleast quality will be good :)
Bottom Line:
Compare to what i have seen 2 years back its much much better. I can say they are on right track. Lots of content available.
I can give this site a tribute showing the secret sex of real indian couple or self shoot video of real indian couple sharign with this world. I love to watch these real indian housewife sex atleast they are doing what they like to do not acting like a hookers :)
Friends, if you love to watch sex of authentic indian housewifes or real indian girls then this site is right on top. go get the access and see it...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Content appears original
- Fairly easy to navigate
- Can use download manager
Cons:
- Videos poor quality
- Complete vids not available
- Updates very few and far between (doesn't appear to be much new at all)
- Basic design
- Content is poorly directed
Bottom Line:
I have a biased view when it comes to my porn (anyone who doesn't needs professional help imho) and when it comes to sites that rely on pics as much or more than vids it is about the quality and eroticism.
Exhibitionism can be very erotic and not something that has to "hit you in the face" with its bluntness. Unfortunately for UK Flashers, it falls sqaurely into the category of "blunt" in its approach.
Before I get onto the aspects of quantity, I'd like to look at the quality of the content, mostly as it is what is sticking out most to me.
Many of the models are not actually models by trade (yeah, obvious to many that they are working girls, but there are still those out there who believe that they are simply models trying to break into the industry.)
Whilst the models will have a concept of poses etc, a majority of the work and direction is carried out by the photographer. The photographer used for this site appears to have a complete lack of imagination (or interest) and the results are the same poses with the only variation being the location.
As for the poses themselves and the camera angles used? Unflattering on the models to say the very least, amateur in production, completely lacking in eroticism (many are plain seedy.) It's as though a bored 18 year old has gone out with his dad's camera, collared a few girls and led with the direction, "Show us yer gash!" There are user submitted sites out there with more professional content than here!
Harsh? Maybe, but combined with so few updates, a basic and tired design and layout and vid quality from early dsl days, this is a site that I'd struggle to recommend for even half the price that I paid.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Models seem to know what they're doing
- Site created by people who understand the niche
- Good range of models / situations
- Appears natural (not forced or heavily scripted)
Cons:
- Photos cannot be downloaded in .zip format
- Vids have to be watched/downloaded in clips only
- Appears to be no recently update photo sections
- Average number of shoots
- Get impression of recycled content
- Some content non-exclusive
- Site needs some work to bring it up to the standards that other sites have adopted as they have evolved over the years.
Bottom Line:
As a brand new user (not a former site member who's returned) this content all looks new to me, although the odd shoot with 1999/2000 imprinted on it is a bit of a give away with a lot of video quality and a few other artefacts in the background.
If you are a previous member, my advice, stay away there is a very good chance that you've seen all this material already and would be wasting your money reinvesting. This is no Met-Art when it comes to purity of archiving.
For new members though; I'm glad to say that the site is what it sets out to be, with a broad section of models and the producers make the most of the fairly limited number of variables that you can have in public exposure.
However, the site does then begin to let itself down in its presentation.
The design of the site tells you that it has seen little updating to code etc in the years that it has been live. Navigation is reasonable with a rudimentary gallery for each section.
Picture and vid quality then begins to show the age of both the site and shoots, and the lack of .zip downloads for photo galleries and only being able to view vids as clips leaves the site out there with other turn of the millenium businesses that have failed to move on. It is a shame really as with a few basic updates and more shoots this could be a great site that is already aiming well at a niche category.
Overall quality of shoots (other than viewing quality) is good, although it is bizarre that on some shoots where a model has clearly been out for about an hour there are only about 12 pics???? With basic flashing, maturbation, public participation and even oral sex/facials so plenty to go round and the site producers know exactly where to be aiming (unlike some sites who aim for a niche and completely miss as they've no idea or interest in it themselves, so well done there.
My view. Not bad; with a bit of work it could be great, but not bad.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
I was a member of this site about 3 monthes ago... it's a really huge collection of upskirt, panties, tight jeans and other voyeur and fetish content.. How i can see now - it was redesigned and updated sometime ago.. Now the index shows following info: PHOTOS: 64981 ; VIDEOS: 1281 - crazy amount.
Cons:
Right, it's a little bit hard to navigate inside ,cause too many sections , too much content...
Bottom Line:
I think that's worth too pay if you 're the real fan of those niches and you don't need to communicate with other members, cause Upskirt Collection still didn't have forum and other chatting tools inside that's why i canceled my membership after 2 monthes... like to discuss my minds with other members.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Features outdoor activities.
Cons:
- Non exclusive content
- "British" is inaccurate in nearly all sets.
- It isn't actually about dogging!!!!
- I don't expect a site to which I am giving money to have ads!
- They are recycling their own content from 4 years ago.
- Poor pic and vid quality.
- Appaling site layout and navigation.
Bottom Line:
Before now I have been able to offer a fairly balanced view of porn sites and have points of merit as well as critique. With British Doggers though, disappointed doesn't even begin to describe my experience.
So, I'll start with the positives. It is a site that features outdoor activities of others.
Previously being a member of this site, I decided to pay it a re-visit to see what the modern content looks like.
And......... it's exactly the same content that I saw 4 years ago recycled.
It is not actually about dogging (I would recommend that the site creators take a look at just what dogging is, or look to Killergram for tips.)
It is recycling content from the turn of the century (and some looks like it is from before.)
The bottom line - it is the first site that I have ever subscribed to where I have cancelled my subscription on the same evening.
This content was fresh in 2004 - maybe it is time that British Doggers closed its doors for good?
If you are looking for dogging in the meantime then I'd recommend that you look elsewhere, you won't find it here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Inexpensive three day full access trial not listed on TBP.
-Bill through CCBill.
-No DRM, download limits, no broken links, etc.
-692 videos of about a few seconds to about three minutes. Most two to three minutes.
-Avi 1280x720 or WMV 520x400, 1478 kbps. Good but not outstanding.
-Can use download managers.
-64,981 photos, 684x1022. Can be zipdownloaded.
-Multiple updates daily.
Cons:
-Many shots are outdoors, so the lighting is sometimes a problem. Often shot from so far away that the videos are not clear and this is not helped by the shaky camera work.
-In spite of decent quality videos, sometimes the movies are still grainy. I am sure this is due to some of the videos being sent in by amateurs.
-Very poor use of English on the site.
Bottom Line:
The site is split into several categories:upskirt, tight jeans, lingerie, sexy shorts, celebs, panties/bikini, downblouse/upblouse, cameltoe, tennis upskirt,and nudism. Very softcore, as none of the photos or videos have any sex or even masturbation. There are photos for each heading, but most videos are listed under the category upskirt. Many of the photos and videos are nonnude, but interesting, and many I recognize as not being exclusive. Many video clips are from the DVD series Dreamgirls for example. The celebrity photos can easily be found on Yahoo or Google. The photo sets can be quite good, although they might only be of seeing a girls panties up her skirt. The videos feature a lot of girls flashing while not wearing panties. I found the videos to be of decent quality and worth watching if you are fussy about which ones you bother with. The best ones are obviously filmed by professionals and the girls know what they are doing. Not hidden camera as the girls try to be provocative. However, nearly 700 videos is a lot and not all are worthwhile. All in all, a lot of enjoyable, entertaining photos and videos, but a lot that is of lesser quality.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Full access trial that also includes full access to nudesportvideo.com
-Weekly updates, over 300 short videos.
-Russian girls that look like amateur, girl next door types. Little or no makeup.
-No dialog, no interviews, nothing spoken.
Cons:
-Too many very skinny girls. I don't want to see ribcages.
-Need more variety of body types and ages.
-Not really voyeur. Obviously staged. This can be a plus-see below.
-Many videos poorly photographed. This is common for this genre, but it is not erotic.
-Often have cheesy background music.
Bottom Line:
It is transparent that these are not genuine voyeur videos. This is a minus if you care about truth in advertising, but to me this is a plus. I prefer that a girl's privacy was not invaded. More importantly, the girls here play up to the camera. There is a lot of explicit nudity and an attempt at teasing. There are also clips of upskirt, panty teasing, stripping, under table, etc. Unfortunately too many videos are just weak and basically don't work. Like so much in porn, a good concept, but the execution just isn't that good. I kept only 6 videos of the more than 300.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Gives you exactly what it promises
- Many, many galleries, split into themes like tits, asses, legs, and beach shots
- small selection of videos
- very frequent updates, about once a week I think
- site is easy to navigate and has a simple layout
- uses CCBill for easy billing
Cons:
- no zip files at all. This site is crying out for them
- many photos are a hit/miss thing; you either like them or you don't. Low signal-to-noise ratio
- no real nudity, but that's to be expected
- if you're a tit man, the ass galleries may not appeal
- needs more vidoes
- it's pretty expensive for what it gives you
Bottom Line:
My overall score is good because this site gives you exactly what it promises - it's for those of us who like to stare at pretty girls as they go past in the street, especially if they're not wearing much. It sticks to its niche and does it well - just lots of pages of photos (and some videos) of women in the street, mostly from eastern Europe by my guess. Obviously there is minimal nudity here (only on some of the beach shots) so you might find this dull compared to "real porn". The other problem is that you may only find 1-2 photos on a page that you like, and have to cycle through lots of them, but this is in the nature of the site. In other words, some really outstanding shots/videos, but most are mediocre.
So, I think this site does its job well, but at the current price, I couldn't justify signing up for more than a few months. If you love gazing at the girls you pass every day, then give it a try.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Newer videos 720x480, many older ones 640x480.
-Nice archive, presently 117 video shoots.
-Many natural, attractive girls who seem to really enjoy flashing. Most of them are very enthusiastic.
-Attractive price through the link from TBP.
-Member forum. Provides news about future updates and you can post suggestions and comments.
Cons:
-Many videos do not have photo shoots and many photo shoots do not have videos.
-Videos do not have a link to download the entire video at once. In the member forum the webmaster recently promised to add a link.
-Updates may take as long as two weeks for an entire shoot. Updates a few clips at a time.
-Photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file. Many photos poor quality. Apparantly not adding new photo shoots.
-May not be all exclusive as the main photographer has videos on other flashing websites.
-Bonus sites streaming only with poor quality videos.
Bottom Line:
Most of the videos were a lot of fun and better than I expected. I counted three with oral sex and a few with a little masturbation, so not only skin. A lot of the videos were quite explicit. A variety of races and ethnicities as well as body types, although most were thin. Most appear to be amateurs, although the shoot of Hannah Hilton was good. I would definitely sign up again in a few months.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fromt long time i was thinking when i will see real indian wife fucking by real indian men. I am really surprised by seeing this site. Real indian housewives kissing, jumping, sucking cock and oral etc etc with their beloved hubbies or boyfriends. This is the best ever site i have ever saw in my whole life in which i can see what i want to see. Real Indian Girl fucked by real indian mens. 110% authentic indian stuff, real people in real scandal or homemade stuff.
These Indian women are in their most sexual moments and they don't know they have a hidden cam on them! Indian hidden cams features real neophytes on hidden spy cameras.
- 80 Real indian hiddencam or spycam videos
- 40 Full lenght title with some honeymoon captured scene
- mpg and avi format with high resolution with voice as south asian i know what they speaking which prove their authenticity.
- Site design is attractive
- What they show in preview easy to find in members area
- Easy and user friendly members area
Cons:
Members area also got some white stuff as well which are also really good and selective. Some of them are real but some people just acting they know that camera is there.
Indianhiddencams.com by name is Indian site but i can see white stuff which i dont like btu as extra feature its good.
Site is recently launched by which you can imagine small amoung content which will grow as time pass.
No Streaming stuff and No Images.
Bottom Line:
I personally really enjoyed this site. Indian Hidden Cams is one of the better Indian hiddencam sites that I've ever seenas there is on 3 available so far :)
Of course you can't come in here and expect to find professional, high quality photography. These are just average people hoping to just capture a glimpse of something exciting on film. However I really enjoyed it. The excitement of watching the girls while they had no idea they were being filmed and to see what real couples do in the privacy of their bedrooms was pretty naughty as well.
A best site in a very very reasonable price which is just $19.95 a month.
Want to see real life indian couple in action, dont go any where this site is just for you!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of nice voyeur videos from (russian?) beaches
- Navigation is ok and easy to check
- Trial available
- multi filetype support
- some videos are high definition
Cons:
- some videos are realy bad quality or wiggly
- increased amount of FAKE voyeur videos found in last months
- most "video episodes" are discontiguous :(
- very rare closeups scenes
Bottom Line:
if you like couples or naked women and men on beaches doing nasty things you will love beachhunters!
The amount of videos (seperated in several categories like "sex on the beach" or "topless") is huge and there are even HD videos available.
Good is that there are several oppotunities of downloading the files in different filesizes and formats.
Not so good is that there are no or very rare closeups videos or scenes :(
Even if the most beachhunters videos are REAL i have noticed that they upload a non irrelevant amount of FAKE VIDEOS that are staged and NOT real voyeur! Thats why i have to diminish my rating from 80 to 77.
In general beachhunters is absolutely worth a look for everyone who is in voyeur videos!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Downloads smooth. Easy to get around site.
Cons:
Total number of site videos is a little misleading as the number of available videos includes the fact that for many of the videos, there are 4 to 6 different camera views of the same video. Some of the videos are in black and white, (or like night vision). Some of the videos are choppy and not clear. Defiently not worth the money.
Bottom Line:
I would not recommend this site as there are other sites, that cost less, that are much better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of Video Content
Very Easy Navigation
Updated Often with Lots of Content
Cheap and Long Trial Period
Newer Videos are High Quality
Decent Download Speeds
Pictures are Zip
You can Download different video formats(avi, mp4, wmv)
No DRM
Cons:
Video Editing is Horrible Video Clips are Redundant
Older Pictures are Screen Captures (poor quality)
Some Videos are Set-Up (fake)
Videos can be Too Short
Some "HD" videos aren't really HD
Very few pussy close-up videos/pics
Bottom Line:
If you are into casual public nudity and public sex then this site offers the most content for the price. There are about 110 pages of video clips with about 40 videos per page and 80 pages of pictures/screen captures, also with 40 sets per page.
You can download the videos in 3 different formats (avi, wmv, mp4) or stream them (except for HD videos). The pictures are available in zip files and sorted by date. In all there is a lot of content here, especially for first time subscribers.
The downfall, however, comes with how the content is presented. In some cases you get 15-30 seconds of a particular woman, and then in other videos (mostly the sex on the beach kind) you get 10-20 minuets. Also, a decent amount of the updates are continuations of previous scenes. There is one couple on here that appears in about 20% of the sex videos. They obviously swing a lot, but man how many times can you show them!
Also, the editing of the clips is horrible. You may get 5-7 seconds of one woman and then it cuts to another woman and then back to the first woman. It is annoying if you like one of them and not the other. Finally, some of the videos are fake (i.e. fake public sex or fake changing rooms). This takes away from the other "voyeur" content that is real and many of the members post complaints on the forums about this.
But when taken as a whole this is probably the best nude beach site on the net I have found. It just needs variety of content and better presentation.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Nifty idea.
- Zip files for pics, which is the only way to go with these kind of pics.
- Videos are of good quality.
- Updated regularly.
Cons:
- Small amount of content for the price.
- Vids stick to the core idea but are repetitive and tend to be boring.
- BACK OF SOME GUY'S HEAD IN A LOT OF THE PICS.
- Minimal acting and/or improvisational skills.
- Some REALLY bad boob-jobs.
Bottom Line:
I enjoyed two of this company's other sites, Panty Maniacs and Panty Amateurs, and so I thought I'd give this a try. It's not nearly as good as those other sites, but it has potential.
The picture sets are shot in a frame-by-frame style which unfortunately means most of the pics are redundant. They have the look and feel of high-quality vid-caps. Only voyeur and/or panty afficianados need apply. There is some nudity but not much. And too many implants.
Someone had the "brilliant" idea of placing some guy's noggin in many of the photos, which is supposed to enhance the voyeuristic feel of the sets. This is a gigantically BAD idea. Since when did peeping become a team sport? I don't want to look over another guy's shoulder to get a glimpse of some cutie in her unmentionables, nor do I wish to have said unmentionables obscured by a large male cranium which always makes me think of Shaun of the Dead. Tell Shaun to take a hike and I'll hold the cyber door open, thanks.
As for the vids: the quality is very good and looks decent full-screen on my 22 inch monitor. But, I wish these girls would have something to do in the bathroom rather than stand around gazing into the mirror or off into space. I don't mean watersports or anything like that, I mean, give them a task. Let them do something. Most of the time the girls look bored and are overly conscious of the camera. I wind up embarrassed for THEM when I'm supposed to be ashamed of MYSELF.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Flashing looks to be 100% real and in locations that I have seen in person.
- Some of the girls are really cute, some are pretty, some are average.
- Models walk up to strangers and talk to them while flashing.
- Everything is average quality or better, pics and vids
Cons:
- There really isn't a whole lot to see on here
- Extreme softcore, very little touching, just quick flash, stop, start over.
- Person videoing talks through the whole thing
- 3rd party content wasn't interesting either
Bottom Line:
I've always been intrigued by exhibitionism and voyeurism, and had saw some samples from this site. I was expecting much more. The samples I saw were the most hardcore parts of the site, and those were even tame. I only downloaded maybe 4 of the girls' videos and pictures, but have never went back to them since downloading them. I would rate it lower, but it does say public flash, not public sex or public masturbation. It just left a lot to be desired for me. If they added maybe 1-2 more clips furthering the tease, then it would rate higher.
My best way to describe my feelings towards the site would be to say I feel like I was in a gym with nothing but women and I walked into the dressing room only to get the door slammed in my face at the last minute!
Definitely need more content and more skin for me and more touching. To put it plainly, it is a very vanilla site. Not recommended if you are wanting more than just basic flashing.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- An original idea. Up close and personal faces of women (and men) experiencing orgasm alone or with a partner.
- Tons of content and all exclusive.
- Some good extra content: interviews and a busy member's forum.
Cons:
- The site is definitely one-note. It almost has more academic interest than erotic.
- Faces only, so it really requires that you enjoy watching people experience orgasm.
- True amateurs, so don't be dissapointed in their looks.
Bottom Line:
You may ask what's the difference between one woman's face as she climaxes, compared to another's. The forum posts by the site's members will help clear that up right away. The members have their favorites and with each girl having an ID number, the forums steer you to the moaners, talkers, screamers. (Sometimes they are a bit too helpful.)
Beautiful agony is reasonably priced to be a look for those with any interest in the artistic or erotic value. All others, steer clear.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
