Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Visit Sharing Paris

1. Sharing Paris (0)

Pay
Active
93
marcdc1 (165) 03-14-07  06:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Paris is incredibly HOT. She does a great job at talking dirty, and has a kinky side that I really like.

Downloads are fast without sacrificing quality.

Pix are hot with a lot of finger banging action

While I'm new to this site I would definitely recommend it to those who like amateur sites
Cons: Still a new site - I look forward to more content!

Site is part of naughtyathome company but you don't get all in one membership. Nor is there any information about getting a multi site discount.

(PS I love naughty at home with Desirae! see my review of her site)
Bottom Line: Good site definitely give it a test drive if you like Amateur sites with a bit of kink.

I think this will grow into a high quality site and it's best to get in on the ground floor if you stay with a site for a long time (this way you lock in to pricing while it's low).
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ryanne Redd

2. Ryanne Redd (0)

Pay
Active
85
xexbot (36) 06-21-12  11:11am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Let me preface this all by saying I am an absolute fan of RyAnne Redd. Arguably, why else would you join her site. So, let me give you the break down.

RyAnne is a super-hot redhead with a full bush of red pubes. She really is very unique in terms of her appearance and her particular niche. For those of you unfamiliar with her, she is a popular, and somewhat of a rare commodity, in the "hairy/hirsute" niche. She also has about the most perfect pair of breasts I have ever seen. So much so I called them "Breasts" and not "titties" or "ta-tas" like I normally would.

She is trying to fill a variety of fetishes. She does some jerkoff instruction, some cuckolding, and various other stuff. In a way it is similar to what some women like Mistress T are doing.

Video wuality is pretty good. You get a choice between HD flv, mp4, and "Ipod."
Cons: Strictly solo material so far. I have seen her in at least one POV blowjob video in the past, but there is nothing but solo material on the site and it would be nice to see her actually fuck someone else or whatever. She's hot, but there are only so many solo videos you can get away with before it starts to just me "lingerie of the week."

Low amount of video content. I'm not going to give you an actual count because this is a new site and it's not fair to her to condemn the site for not having a ton of material yet. That being said, though, it is a shame she couldn't at least get some of her previous videos on her new site.
Bottom Line: At the moment I have to say the jury is still out on this one. I gave the score of 85 simply because there are thing that make me think this site may be a lot bigger soon. They have links/buttons already in place to scroll through pages of videos and seem to be designing the site basically as you would expect any other soloists site to be. Can it be improved, sure. Better search capability, greater diversity in material, etc. The usual stuff.

The selling point here is that it is RyAnne Redd, and if you are a fan, you are probably an obsessed fan. It's worth a month's subscription just to snag those few extra videos of her.

I have an issue in that I am a huge fan, so I want to just shower her with accolades, but I also think that as a customer other people might want to know what they are paying for. If people don't subscribe, then the site will most likely fail. But telling people to subscribe to a site that has very little to offer right out of the gate isn't really fair to them. If you're a fan, a month's membership is a good way to show your appreciation and encourage her to do more, and I'll leave it at that.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Playful Alice

3. Playful Alice (0)

Pay
Active
70
troglodite (69) 06-30-07  11:59am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (34), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: * Alice is very cute, and flexible! Her personality does get a chance to show in her vids too.

* Vids and pictures look pretty decent at 640x480 and 1200k.

* Site is easy to navigate

* She does have a webcam, though I didn't manage to make any shows during my membership (and they weren't as often as advertised).
Cons: * Video updates were few and far between - I think there were 2 during my month of membership

* Action is very tame and some vids are virtually non-nude, despite even though the tour says "Inside my members section I get really naughty and fully naked!!" She does - but don't expect it a lot. She likes to cover up the good bits a lot.

* Content is still sparse - only 9 vids so far. I don't recall the count of picsets unfortunately.
Bottom Line: After joining sites for several years now, I've joined a lot of the ones that have been around a while, so I sometimes jump a bit soon at new sites, and this was the case here. It's a very recently-launched site, and as such it just doesn't have the content to support the price tag just yet, and I was left wondering - is it my fault for joining too early, or should they have had more content available before launching?

After one evening, I felt I had seen all the site had to offer currently, and was left to count on site updates, which didn't really occur too awful regularly. Having also joined two of this company's other sites in the past (Wild Eva and Hardcore Mandy), I wasn't sure whether to expect a site with mostly tease content (like Wild Eva) or more explicit stuff which I tend to like better (like HC Mandy). Unfortunately, it was very similar to Wild Eva, but with less daring content, and much less of it.

On the bright side, I like Alice's look much better than either of the two aforementioned girls, and in time, this site can certainly grow to match their quality. Right now, however, I can only really recommend it to people who really find Alice to be super-hot. And even then, you should beware that this is mostly softcore-tease content. Don't expect to see her o-face or even more than a few coochie shots and you may end up completely satisfied.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sharing Paris

4. Sharing Paris (0)

Pay
Active
60
james4096 (126) 07-20-09  04:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Download manager friendly
- Exclusive amateur content
- Paris is a supercute redhead
- No DRM
Cons: - No more updates
- Photo resolution is poor.
- Video quality is bad
- Not much content
- Design and navigation are poor.
- Expensive for a dead site, almost $24
Bottom Line: This site looks like and is made by the same people who do naughty at home, which is a site I really enjoy. It is a similar site, a sexy slut wife fucking and sucking her husband and other guys too. She fucks guys and in a few scenes messes with girls. The photography and action is shot in an amateur style, which is not necessarily a bad thing for some people. Paris is a really nice looking redhead, but the problem with this site is that there are no updates. I don't know when the site stopped updating, but it was probably sometime 2007 or 2008. The updates aren't dated, but on the preview page they claim that they updated on July 20 or 109(?), that's a lie. There is not much content to begin with, you'll find 80 photo sets and 44 video scenes in the member/s area. The site has basic and outdated design and navigation, all the videos on one page and all the photosets on another.

The photos are 600x900 with no zip downloads. The videos are 420x316 641kbps wmv's. Basically both the pix are well below what you'd expect to see today. There are a few standard feeds, but nothing great.

This site wouldn't have been bad if she had kept it going. This is a dead site with outdated content. I do believe this girl is still working, I saw her do some fetish and a few mainstream porn videos. I like the way she looks and I always love real amateur porn, but I would advise against paying money for this site alone. I do not recommend this site unless you absolutely need to see this girl.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lucy Daily

5. Lucy Daily (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
the centaur (3) 04-27-10  10:54pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Quality of videos and pictures are very good
- "Lucy" is an original looking model that has both qualities of being amateurish and professional
- You get a variety of other model sites when you sign up that are just as good
- No hidden fees or cross sales when you sign up
- Get access to her cam shows
Cons: - Price seems a bit to steep for the amount of content currently available
- Content doesn't get updated that often, if any.
- The teaser trailer shows different videos than what is actually offered in the members area. This is a big con to the site since the ones shown in the teaser look far better than the ones offered in the members area. Seems like a con to get you to sign up with hopes of these being offered.
Bottom Line: For the price to sign up, the content available already is close to being worth it, if there were more videos being offered and regular updates. The videos shown in the teaser look a lot hotter than the ones offered in the members area and since they are not offered, than signing up for this site mainly from what is shown, cannot be summed up from the saying of "what you see is what you get". Mainly because it isn't.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Strawberry

6. Club Strawberry (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Licker (0) 06-17-14  11:19am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: None
Cons: Old, very, very old material as in stuff from 2000
Low, low resolution. Like 640x480.
Very tiny amount of content: maybe 20 sets in total.
Content is regurgitated content from other sites as well.
Advertised content is not found in the website.
Bottom Line: Don't bother. The material hasn't been updated since Saddam Hussein was still in power. It's a dead site with the same 20 sets rotated over and over. Not even worth the $2.95 trial.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Redhead In Heat

7. Redhead In Heat (0)

Pay
Active
50
pat362 (371) 08-25-11  06:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +There are 64 videos which can be downloaded in WMV.
+There are 94 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+CCbill is the CC processor.
Cons: -The videos all fall under bad with crappy 320x240 resolution, bad camera angles, bad lighting, and even a few out of focus shots.
-All the phototsets are 640x480 resolution.
-I'm pretty sure the content is identical to the one found on mandingogirl.
-There is very little info about the videos or phototsets so you have to open the file to find out what you'll get.
-They are still updating with new content but quality is so bad that I'd be willing to bet that it's just recylced content from years ago.
Bottom Line: *Dawn is not your typical bone thin young woman but is instead a pretty chubby all natural red head woman who has a southern accent and likes enjoy having sex with multiple partners at the same time. She seems to favor IR perfromers.

*This site could have been something good but the videos are so bad that tube sites wouldn' bother using them. There is no reason for anyone else to get taken in by their less than honest preview. Videos in 320x240 resolution should not exist today and any site that offers only this type of resolution should close shop right now instead of stealing money from fools like me.

**I'll post a comment about mandingogirl as well because I suspect that they share content or may even have the exact same content. I can't be 100% sure and I'm not joining them to find out. One bad decision is enough for me. Neddless to say avoid mandingogirl because it's not going to be any better than this one**
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-7 of 7  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. None

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.