Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Sharing Paris

Sharing Paris (0)

Active
60
james4096 (126) 07-20-09  04:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Download manager friendly
- Exclusive amateur content
- Paris is a supercute redhead
- No DRM
Cons: - No more updates
- Photo resolution is poor.
- Video quality is bad
- Not much content
- Design and navigation are poor.
- Expensive for a dead site, almost $24
Bottom Line: This site looks like and is made by the same people who do naughty at home, which is a site I really enjoy. It is a similar site, a sexy slut wife fucking and sucking her husband and other guys too. She fucks guys and in a few scenes messes with girls. The photography and action is shot in an amateur style, which is not necessarily a bad thing for some people. Paris is a really nice looking redhead, but the problem with this site is that there are no updates. I don't know when the site stopped updating, but it was probably sometime 2007 or 2008. The updates aren't dated, but on the preview page they claim that they updated on July 20 or 109(?), that's a lie. There is not much content to begin with, you'll find 80 photo sets and 44 video scenes in the member/s area. The site has basic and outdated design and navigation, all the videos on one page and all the photosets on another.

The photos are 600x900 with no zip downloads. The videos are 420x316 641kbps wmv's. Basically both the pix are well below what you'd expect to see today. There are a few standard feeds, but nothing great.

This site wouldn't have been bad if she had kept it going. This is a dead site with outdated content. I do believe this girl is still working, I saw her do some fetish and a few mainstream porn videos. I like the way she looks and I always love real amateur porn, but I would advise against paying money for this site alone. I do not recommend this site unless you absolutely need to see this girl.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

GCode (101) Man james4096, you seem to be in a slump in joining some poor sites lately :( I checked out your recent reviews and there are so many in the lower numbers recently. I really hope you can get to join a nice site soon, I'd love to see a positive review SOME time soon! :)
07-23-09  07:58pm

Reply To Message

2

james4096 (126) REPLY TO #1 - GCode :

Thanks for your concern GC.

I admit that I'm a tough critic. Even though I give these sites low scores based on technical merit, I usually don't totally regret joining. I'm always looking for new stuff to feed my porn addiction and I usually can find something worth keeping from most sites I join. I just want to give others a warning.

Anyways, I have found a few nice sites thanks to reviews I've read here from other PU's.

07-24-09  01:22pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.