so, after about a week of going thru all of the videos on the site, ive noticed the last few have really gotten rediculous..honestly, the most recent one, was of a naked chick carving a pumkin...THATS IT!! i swear! it was followed up with a very soft masterbation episode..but it was crap..it is getting so far away from when the site first started, with picking drunk chicks up and bringing them home blah blah...very very little of that as of recent...soooooo
i came on here to refresh my memory of the reviews...i read from the sites webmaster that they are adding old scenes as they are getting remastered, and if you emailed him he would reply quickly...well, one out of two isint bad...its been 3 days and i still havent heard from him...the good news is i went back just to see if there were any new scenes added...and much to my pervin pleasure....YESSSSSSS...and they look very promising...hot chicks..in bars ..you know, the good stuff!!...anyways, i havent watched them yet...but im impressed with this part of the site..
also on a side note, i think if they added afterhours exposed as a bonus site, it would look more attractive package, eventough many of the scenes are taken from the same night or even same scenes...anyways, thats all...now time to watch those old scenes!! ;))
AFTER SECOND THOUGHT.
i might have been navigating the site wrong..i guess there is no way to tell when the older remastered scenes were added..they give the original date but not the revised added into the new site date...ugh, im confusing myself now!!
bottom line, prob worth a month or two, if they include afterhours exposed, (just to make sure you see all the drunken filth!)
Could be a much better site - certainly its advertisement is good, but the site isn't as good as the ads. Too small a collection of videos to justify the price. Very little hardcore. Used to be better in the past.
I just joined the dancingbear.com 2 day trial. The videos have no download option even though on their website it says "Watch or download this video" on every video update! Before it just stated "watch this video" but now since they updated this to "Watch or download this video" on all the videos, I decided to try it. In the members area no download option was available (8-26-10)you can still only stream the videos. I explained this to customer service in a email but in response they just cancelled my membership without commenting on the download video false advertising. I expected more from Bangbros, the owner of this site!
Outdoors sets, apparently shot in Eastern Europe interest me. Also those done in bars, public transportation and so on. Are they all acted with no real bypassers? I guess it'd be hard to find a bus driver that accepts that kind of action, a bar owner might be easier with even willing audience. Of course it's clear that all the touching and action is scripted, if for nothing else, at least to avoid STD's and such.
The newer stuff seems to be more indoors sadly. I wouldn't really call it public if it was shot in a private party or event.
Trial memberships only give very limited access to the site. You have to purchase a full month's membership to view the pics in full size or download full movies (or more than the first few very small clips of the films).
The site has a lot of content and may be worth the price of a full membership, but the misleading, limited trial is a turn-off.
Does anyone have connection issues with this site?
This is the only site where I have problems signing in, as well as navigate within the site once I'm in. If I want to be successful I have to hit the "reload page" button on my browser over and over until I finally connect. Just clicking once on the link won't do it because if I do it that way I could sit there for minutes waiting for a page to load and it never does. I thought it might be my browser but this is the only site where this happens. Any helpful suggestions would be appreciated.
I think the rearadmiral has done a great job summing up this Kink site. While BDSM is not really one of my niches I must say that the scenes I have watched so far are worth a subscription. Quality and inventiveness are excellent.
Since my last comment about this site, the site administrators have updated the site and made all pages available for viewing. After fixing the problem, I can honestly give Enrique's Beach a positive recommendation. It's a very unique site that features hot Asian nudist girls -- along with hot white hairy hippie chicks -- at the beach which is a rarity elsewhere.
I've sent emails many times and no one ever responds. They have 12 pages of picture sets;however, they have disbled the first 6 pages; therefore, you are only getting half of what you paid for. It's a shame that the owner is so arrogant and careless because this site has a lot of potential -- this could easily be the best nudist/voyeur site on the net.
Most of their high-quality pics are from Baker Beach in the Bay area. This site features a lot of sexy Asian girls, Latinas, topless, nude,thongs, and even a few hairy girls which I particularly love. A lot of sexy white girls too and even some hot hippie chicks.
"NEW PHOTO VIEWER posted January 24, 2010
Our members requested a better way to view our photos and now we've delivered! When you click "VIEW PHOTO SET" on a model's video, you'll now access the new photo set viewer. You can surf to any photo set right from the viewer and also download the high resolution zip file!"
There are two photosets at Eroberlin currently that have images at 3872x2592 (both of Cayenne), available in zip format only as the message on the home page makes clear.
The rest of them go no larger than 1600 px -- when the photos are in landscape orientation. 1080 is normal for portrait.
This would be a pointless quibble on my part were it not for the fact that Eroberlin itself labels those two 3872x2592 photosets of Cayenne as "high resolution" and labels all of the other photosets available on the site as "low resolution." Mind you, this is not from the photo viewer, which doesn't label but provides download only through a simple disk icon. But from each model page, there are buttons for downloading zips, and when you click them, "low resolution" is the only option available -- except in those two Cayenne cases already mentioned.
But just to make sure, I downloaded several sets from the viewer anyway. It didn't make any difference.
Well, Eroberlin, if you don't call them "high resolution," I guess I won't either. But how do you explain the statement you made, quoted above? You're telling people that they can get something from your site that even you don't believe you have!
This is NOT just an alteration of my latest review of Ero Berlin - but more like a runner-up - and a suggestion for the site-owners/webmasters - after being a member for a month - and leaving now.....
First: you still got some damn fine videos - AND some with dirty talk.
1) Your updates are really not worth the price: 5 (or maybe 6, the most) in a month....not ok.
2) Your site is maybe the slowest, I've come across in a long time (browsing) - downloads a little better.
And again: Too bad, because you've got some very fine potentials here, and I guess a lot of more serious pornusers will get fed up with the slow speed and the too few updates...
Look forward to improvements here, because this is in many other ways a great site
Since there is already a good review on this site. I would only comment that the site seems to be new with slightly limited content so might be worthwhile to wait for few months before joining as its not updated daily. Content seems to be professionally done. Download speed seems to be ok but the downloads do not resume. So using download managers won't help much. I would love to see them allowing downloads to resume as HD contents to some might be small but to me is a large download.
This was originally intended to be a review, but...
It's been quite a while since I had membership at this site (around August 09). I wanted to write a review at the time so I took some notes, but then it got forgotten during my busy summer days... so I decided to post some things about it as a comment instead.
I joined because I received a 1-month special price for any kink.com site for $19.95 (not recurring). At this price I felt like checking out Public Disgrace, which overall brought exactly what I expected, nothing more, nothing less.
A few facts from back that time:
- Average set of pictures seemed to be usually between 130 - 160 pictures, but would range from 60 to 300 in some cases. There's an option for low (533x800) and high (1200x675) resolutions.
- Video length was around 60 minutes on average, while there were some clips that were only 20 minutes long, some were close to 90 though. You have the choice to download the scenes or the whole movies in 4 different formats: ipod mp4 640x360, hd mp4 (highest quality) 1280x720, hd wmv 1280x720, wmv 960x540 (and I could stream these too though); plus there's flash streaming too (selectable low, medium or high quality settings).
- Download speed varied between 400kb/s to 900kb/s (very satisfying), but when doing multiple downloads at once I reached the total of 1500kb/s download speed, which is straight forward great
- Updates seemed to come every 4 - 7 days
I missed that I had no access to any other sites of their network. On the other hand you do get some bonus, random hardcore material that's compiled from all their network's sites, plus you get the "Behind Kink" which shows you some behind the scenes stuff which was interesting.
I liked the site's design and structure, I thought it was very easy to navigate... at the time the only thing they lacked was a 'download all pictures in one' direct link, but that's about it. You can look up models, find out about all the scenes they did for Kink, and they also have a calendar where you can see the upcoming shootings.
As a side note, I feel pretty confident that all the action done by supposedly outsiders was faked. Also, in regards of the previous comment from mbaya about the legality of their outside actions, I do have to agree that it's somewhat worrying. I have not heard of any country in the world that would allow the possibility of underage people coming across public sex / porn filming in public, and there are situations where it's obvious that they just disregarded these regulations (where the tram or cars passed by, etc). Sure it's probably rather easy to get away with it on spot in Eastern Europe, but the fact that they - as a huge network - can get away with this on the long run and make money in North - America by selling the very proof of their irresponsible practices is somewhat concerning. Then I might be wrong.
Overall it was good but nothing extraordinary. As far as I know regular price would be $29.95/month, which I'd think is a little too much for what you get.
The site is no longer updating. (It may have been replaced by the Dirty World Tour that is now part of the Bangbros network.) I think you may be able to get it for $10 if you call the support line directly (1-866-346-1785).
Maggie claims that:
"On Public Nude Sluts there are "No rules and no limits."
Well as stated in the site facts there's a daily dl limit of 1 GB. I am puzzled as to why this isn't considered being a con and not even mentioned in the review?
A site that is MUCH better than Public Nude Sluts is Nip-activity, which received a lower score than this site, even if there's NO dl limit on Nip-activity, and it has lots of longer running HD videos!
Why, if I may ask?
And one thing more:
The site facts states that use of downloadmanagers aren't allowed, yet Maggie says they should work...?
Why would you want to use a dl manager when all you can dl is 1 GB a day?
Like the idea of sex in public - reminds me of my younger days.
AND there's a lot of good intentions here at this Bangbros-company site - good fantasies about sex in a lot of different places.
But, quite honestly - I do not understand how a production-site like BB can agree on the way the site's audio is worked out.
It's almost embarrasing to listen to this certain guy getting - oh, BTW - well known models - to have sex.
We all know the models in question - and of course, the deal is that you "just met them on the street". AND that's quite ok!
But still - to listen to this same guy in weird english and a whole lot of stupid questions/comments - man, that's not a turn-on - BUT a turn-off.
Hope BB will get better at this site in the future...
I thought I should update everyone on the Public Invasion site. I have been able to access the Bangbros network with my Public Invasion user name and password. That is a big plus. The negative however is that the site has not been updated since June. Hopefully they're just taking a summer break. I would add that if you are a collector of eurobabe scenes, this is a must for a month stay to pick up scenes that you cannot get elsewhere.
1. When I signed up the form stated the price was $24.95; after I paid the completed purchase page said I was charged $29.95. I immediately used the chat line and was told it was a mistake and was given a $9.95 rate.
2. The first nonmember page says that if you subscribe you get 500 invasion scenes plus " full access to the Bangbros network". This is incorrect; the access is only to the Big Ass Pass Network with a couple of a third tier sites.
I am happy to have a $9.95 rate but I wanted to be sure people knew about the situation.
I recently wrote in the forums of this site and my critique was removed in less than 24 hours. Please note that #6 was wrong and I did add a reply to note this. Basically, the video I thought was reposts was video that appeared on another site (jackass-nudebeach.com) so it was not reposted for this site. Here is what I wrote:
Subject: We are not that stupid
While I appreciate the site there are several problems that could be addressed to make the site much better. However, I am guessing that those who own/manage it are soooo rich that they do not care to make more money, or they smoke pot all day and are unmotivated to improve it. In either case here is what needs to be fixed, because for those of use who subscribe and browse the collection from time to time...to put it bluntly...we are not that stupid to notice that...
1. Making 20 videos out of a single 5 minuet clip and then spreading them over a 5 month period doesn't mean that the site has more content. It just means the user has to spend more time downloading a bunch of short clips instead of one. I assume the owners feel this increases the appearance of their content and/or dissuades users from using more bandwidth. In either case it sucks and makes the experience second rate to quality adult sites.
2. Video shot from above that shows shoulders and bald-headed men plain suck and should appear very rarely. If I wanted to look at the tops of naked bald headed men I would find a spot in the ceiling of the men's locker room at the local YMCA.
3. High Definition video is NOT up-converted standard definition video OR compressed HD video made to be smaller in file size so that users use less bandwidth. Just because a video appears in HD aspect ratios doesn't make it HD, and yes we can tell. Come on most of us HAVE HD or are members of sites that offer REAL HD (e.g. ilovethebeach.com). Real HD doesn't take up 9MB for 17 sec clips but about 50+MB.
4. Did I mention how STUPID clips that are less than 1 minuet are...
5. Taking captures of the REAL HD video (which is not made available to subscribers) and then posting it as "pictures" is weak. It is quite obvious that this is what you are doing...
6. You may have 190+ pages of video content (mostly due to the STUPID 17 second clips), but that doesn't mean you need to repost so many videos. Sure most people will get tired of wading through the STUPID 17 second clips, but those of us with memories longer than goldfish are quite aware of how many reposts appear in the course of a year.
To summarize this site could be SUPER cool. It could have the quality that ilovethebeach.com has with its content. But it appears that those who manage this site are cheap and prefer to cut corners and maintain their profit margin instead of increase it. It could be such a great site too which is what makes it a shame...I do wish they read this and consider some of what I have said (even if it was caustic and sarcastic).
Even though it's not marketed with any other networks, does anybody know what "family" this site belongs to? Kind of like how BrandiBelle is run by the Bang Bros people but it's not marketed or included in their network.
The tour of this page looks similar to some networks out there all the way down to design but I can't figure it out. There's a special deal if you are a Bang Bros member, but they have deals for Reality Kings, Twisty's, etc. as well so "Dancing Bear" is not necessarily run by them.
This site seems like an interesting genre that hasn't been touched, although I don't believe that the women actually doing the bj's or sex are "real women" as the tour videos say. It's probably like other reality sites (bang bus) where models mix in with "real women" in a real-life situation and the one's that actually start to do stuff for the camera are the models.
I joined last month, mostly cause I've always been curious about the site. The price was right- $4.95 for the first two weeks, then $8.95 a month after that, so I took a two-week peek. Unfortunately, there's so little to see, I couldn't even put a decent review together.
13 models, some with a set or two, some with a few more, for a total of just under 4000 pictures. The pictures are definitely the strong suit for this site, running in the 1300 x 800 range. There are only 10 videos up in wmv format that average under 2 minutes a piece. They looked okay - 640x360 resolution - but they're just so damn short. The update schedule is erratic as hell, some coming about 2 weeks apart.
If I had to put a number on it, I'd give it a 70. Nice concept that seriously needs to grow.
When the site was launched this fall, there was a lot of concern being shown in the members forum about the legality or appropriateness of shooting in public. The outdoor scenes were deliberately shot in Eastern Europe, where laws are less strict than in the US, as well as the fact that penalties and fines are lower. Immediately members from Eastern Europe had a lot to say. What also generated a lot of criticism from members was that many scenes seemed to show no concern if children, or even adults were witnesses without their consent. The rules at present do not permit children to be witnesses, nor unwilling adults. Many scenes have cars passing by. How can anyone know if there are children in the cars? How can anyone know if the adult passengers consented? These are still unanswered questions in my opinion. While the site is very exciting, are they following their self imposed rules? Are they violating any laws? Who knows.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.