Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

At what point do you think a porn producer would go before firing a star who's on drugs?

Type: General

Submitted by graymane (31)
On just suspicion alone 5% 1 Votes
Hear through the grapevine 0% 0 Votes
When it becomes obvious 9% 2 Votes
Only if it impairs production 64% 14 Votes
Ok unless it gets in the news 5% 1 Votes
Other 18% 4 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

22 Votes Total

Nov 29, 2013

Poll Replies (9)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

jberryl69 (Disabled) First, it would depend upon who the producer is and their sensitivity to drug use.

If a producer has a zero tolerance level, he'd not book someone he suspects of using. If a producer is ambivalent to drug use, then the criteria might be how it effects the production or his business in general.

11-29-13  06:22am

Reply To Message

2

graymane (31) I know a guy who gets drunk every night of the year.
Yet always attends and is on time for work at his job the next morning. and so far as I know continues to excel at it.
What is it they say??? "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."

11-29-13  06:27am

Reply To Message

3

Drooler (220) Depending on the drug, it could actually enhance production I suppose. The only girl I've seen who I think was out of it was Chastity Lynn. I do hope she doesn't ruin herself and her fine charms with substance abuse.
11-29-13  10:00am

Reply To Message

4

turboshaft (24) Since "on drugs" could mean any number of things I'm going to say "Only if it impairs production." If someone has an audience and can still work producers will tolerate a lot--just like in mainstream Hollywood, and to a certain extent in politics as well.

Read a few interviews or tweets of current performers and it's clear that pot is the go-to drug of choice at the moment. While it certainly doesn't help them come off as women who are more than airheaded eye candy they're aren't flying planes or engineering vaccines either, so no harm no foul.

11-29-13  12:35pm

Reply To Message

5

pat362 (371) I wish they would be proactive but I suspect that most would only do it if the performers becomes a problem during the shoot. Otherwise I don't think they care all that much.
11-29-13  05:33pm

Reply To Message

6

Thedebilman666 (Suspended) Where do you think most of the girls score their dope from? Directors/producers. Calm down, it was a joke.
11-30-13  07:27pm

Reply To Message

7

graymane (31) REPLY TO #6 - Thedebilman666 :

Still think you otta consider supplying one-liners for Late Night monologues.

As for "calming down" ....... not to worry, de666billion.
My antidote is working.
Your very clever retorts anymore are bouncing away like bullets off the chest of Superman ......or given I'm in my Wonder woman attire, my wrist bracelets.

So load up a full metal jacket an' let'em fly, guy.
It ain't R. Lee Ermey tak'n the rounds, anymore.

11-30-13  09:32pm

Reply To Message

8

Thedebilman666 (Suspended) About time SOMEONE grew up around here. R. Lee Ermy is a slack jawed f****t compared to me...I trained real men to be real men.
11-30-13  09:39pm

Reply To Message

9

marcdc1 (165) This question is a tough one. A performer whose judgment (consent) is impaired should not be on set. The moral/ethical/legal implications are obvious.

On the other hand to deprive someone of their livelyhood for rumors is wrong.

I think the line has to be if consent is impaired.

12-01-13  04:19pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.