Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo (0)

Marcus (47) 06-02-13  11:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)

Won't be joining out of principle

There's only one review in this recent flood that I would call balanced and fair. The others seem disproportionately biased. None of them seem to justify why their scores are so much higher than any of the other sites reviewed here on PU. Most of the pros seem applicable to most sites reviewed on Porn Users.

It makes me angry that their site admin sends people here to write such glaringly unbalanced reviews. It comes across as desperate and because episodes like this ruin the integrity that PU has, I won't be joining the site out of principle.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (4)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


thaavi (3) Ok, I need to reply about two things:

All the facts and technical details are here http://www.thebestporn.com/review/idreamofjo/#review. There is no need to duplicate these data in any of members reviews. No member review is balanced and fair, every review is subjective and created from very own feelings and that´s the sense of it, to point out some things that cannot be described as just a simple fact.

Admin didn´t send us here to write glorifying reviews. He only mentioned it is possibility to write a review here, that´s all.

06-03-13  02:56am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #1 - thaavi :

If you think that because TBP has done a review and offered technical info that you and almost everyone else who has done a review doesn't need to add anything then you have completely missed the point of PU and the people who post reviews.

Here's a list of things that you might want to consider.

1-TBP's review is already 4 months old so there could have been some changes since that review.

2-We all see things a little differently so it's important that a review have as much info from the reviewers point of view so that we can see the site through his or her eyes.

3-None of us would have had an issue if only one person had posted a less than decent review but there are have been 5 reviews in the last four days and only one had the decency to write an unbiased review.

4-Do you realise that 2 of the reviews had zero cons and the other 2 had lack of BTS content as the con. I sometimes have a hard time finding cons in some sites but I still try to add some because there is no such thing as a perfect site.

5-Almost everybody said that she is artistic and creative as a pro. That sounds nice but what does that mean? If you had at least written more info talking about the content then those words would have had some meaning.

06-03-13  06:42pm

Reply To Message


thaavi (3) REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :

1) the number of realised scenes had increased, there were about 30 updates since the review:)

2)I tried to offer info I think is relevant and important, not everything you can measure or count

3)I personally think no review is unbiased, it´s a basic contradiction, only some of them tries to look unbiased, only unbiased review is a review that recites facts

4)I think there were some cons mentioned, I will try harder to find more, I promise:)

5) The scenes in interiers are subordinated to certain meaning, atmosphere - with the decorations and with the clothes used, make-up and also music used. For example there was a scene with broken mirrors placed on the black walls giving interesting reflections and Jo wearing special outfit to accent the scene or there was a noir-like scene or stylized scenes in a rent castle rooms. Another thing is great work with natural light from sun, windows, candles and camera filtering, there is also a big variety in outdoors - scenes on a cliff, river bed, autumn wood, at a lake, on a watchtower, etc. There was also storyline lately including 12 episodes.

06-04-13  03:42am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #3 - thaavi :

The comment section is not where you should be posting this info but on your review. The people interested in the site probably won't read comments if there is a recent review.
06-04-13  06:41pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.