Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo (0)

exotics4me (463) 05-31-13  01:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (0)

Seriously?

I see this listed as being owned by Viv Thomas, and to be honest, looking at the preview page, that does not look anything like new content. Even worse, one of the new videos says it was released in November 2013. Just a friendly warning to those seeing the high reviews pop up.

I'm not saying it isn't new content, but that "reunited" set with Eve Angel in the preview looks like a set I have from the mid-2000s.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (20)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

thaavi (3) I am a member of this wonderfull site and I can assure you there are updates minimally twice a week. Yesterday on 30th May was an update. Yes, this site is done in collaboration with Viv Thomas, but the site is NOT a rip off, videos originally filmed for the site are being realeased there every single week!
05-31-13  03:05am

Reply To Message

2

pat362 (371) I checked the site out and I count 50 updates this year. That's 50 if you count videos and pic sets separately. Otherwise there have been only 25 updates this year. What I found interesting is that some of the new updates are actually from the future because they are dated Nov 2013. I think the webmaster should use that for promo because they are the only site that is able to release content ahead of it's being done.

I think Jo is a very attractive woman and I may one day join her site but it certainly won't be from any of the recent reviews or comments because these don't appear to be impartial and that in my opinion does not help the site but actually make me weary of joining.

05-31-13  03:40am

Reply To Message

3

Marcus (45) REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :

I agree. When a lot of biased (even if well-meaning) reviews flood a website profile page here on PU, it does nothing to encourage me to join.
05-31-13  09:59am

Reply To Message

4

pat362 (371) REPLY TO #3 - Marcus :

All I'll say is that a high score with no supporting data except for the insane adulation of the reviewer is a sure way to make the review useless. Case in point the two reviews for I dream of Jo. Sorry but you lose me when you describe a 32 year old woman has having a girl next door look. Jo/Monika is still an amazing looking woman but she has not looked like a girl in a very long time.

This may be a great site but none of the most I'll even go so far as to say that I'm now a little more nervous about content because of the reviews.

05-31-13  03:51pm

Reply To Message

5

Elmien (0) REPLY TO #4 - pat362 :

You know what if you take up every thing literally you will never be satisfied with anything. What I meant by the "girl next door" look is that she is down to earth, and very humble person.
For the nervous people that can't decide to join....
1. I can assure you there is a weekly update on this site.
2. It original and very artistic porn
3. The models that is used in this site is of the best.
4. Passion and sensuality
5. Photos and videos are of high quality.

05-31-13  11:49pm

Reply To Message

6

luv lickn clit (21) Two reviews by newly registered members on the same day does raise a red flag. But no doubt Jo is hot, and does some of the best girl/girl scenes available.
06-01-13  03:14am

Reply To Message

7

pat362 (371) REPLY TO #5 - Elmien :

Tell you what. Take a look at the reviewers with the most reviews and see what their reviews have in common. Then look at all of the recent reviews for Jo's site and you will notice that they don't have any of the important stuff needed to make a good review. What you basically have right now are a bunch of fans fawning over a porn performer and who cannot remove their feelings from their reviews.

The people who might be interested in joining want to know what they will find inside the members area and not that Jo is a girl next door type. They want to know if she does solo, b/g and g/g. What quantity of each. They want to know video resolution and photo resolution.

Let me see if I can make this simple. They want facts first and then fawning.

06-01-13  10:38am

Reply To Message

8

thaavi (3) REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :

Hahaha, funny, when someone tries to sincerely describe his feelings about the site and open his heart, people start to telling him, damn, it looks weird and not believable:)
06-01-13  05:23pm

Reply To Message

9

thaavi (3) REPLY TO #4 - pat362 :

Excuse me, Can you please describe me what you consider as relevant data???
I´m sorry that you haven´t met women in their 30´s that still has the next door girl look.
And btw. she is 31:)

No big deal, no offense:)

06-01-13  05:29pm

Reply To Message

10

thaavi (3) REPLY TO #7 - pat362 :

If you want facts and data that btw DO NOT TELL ANYTHING about how unique and special this or any other site is, you can always read the major review, over there are all the facts. People in their reviews were trying to from their heart and mind describe nicely what is the main attitude and what REALLY is going on there. But this is something some people are I dunno why very suspicious about and missing the whole point...

And btw. number of facts doesn´t mean the review is good.

Ok, just my opinion

Regards.

06-01-13  05:38pm

Reply To Message

11

Nick Spillum (13)
Webmaster
Hi there,

Thanks for commenting on this site The Nov 2013 is an error we here at Viv Thomas made on the site, it'll be fixed first thing tomorrow. Apologies for that, but trust me it wasn't designed to mislead anyone.

Secondly the point about original content. I can assure you Jo shoots content regularly and sends it over to us for editing. We release one video scene, and one photo set very week and sometimes additional bonus content during the week.

The "reunited" set was filmed this year, definitely not in the mid 2000s :) I think both girls would be extremely happy that they appear not to have noticeably aged in 8 years :)

06-02-13  12:02am

Reply To Message

12

ChaseGC (1) I'd like to know what set Jo & Eve did together in the mid-2000s where Jo looked 31 and Eve looked 29, when they were 23 and 21, respectively.

Do you guys really need reviews from site members who I have actually watched the videos? Can't you just make them up based on the number of typos you've found on the site?

06-02-13  02:19pm

Reply To Message

13

exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #12 - ChaseGC :

First thing to know is I have collected Eve content since 2003. I have an external with over 1 TB of Eve's content including the rarest of rare scenes like the gangbang scene, her interracial boy/girl scene, her Bubblegirls scenes and everything I've found from 21 Sextury to DDF to her first solo site eveangel.com to her last solo site eveangelofficial.com

Second thing to know is I'm a huge supporter and fan of Viv Thomas as can be seen by mid-90s score on his video site. I have no malicious reason to question if these scenes are recycled. If you need a link or proof of the scene I was talking about, see here at Viv's video site.
http://www.vivthomasvideo.com/modelConte...pe=videos&page=6
Bottom left hand corner with Jo in a lightly colored bed, just like the scene on the front page of I Dream of Jo, in the updates. Eve nor Jo have changed that much and it's based simply on one small vidcap on the new one. I asked on that one based on curiosity since I do collect Eve content and if there's some I don't have, I would like to have it.

Lastly and I mean nothing negative towards Viv's site with this, but his sites and content has become confusing. If you would like to see this, look at this link from his video site, http://www.vivthomasvideo.com/modelConte...pe=videos&page=6
Bottom right hand corner is a scene with Eve, Jo and a guy from the DVD Bubblegum Babes 5. It is dated on Viv Thomas Video - July 3rd, 2003. Now look on Viv's regular site, http://www.vivthomas.com/model/eve-angel/, click load more until 2010 scenes open and there is the same scene from Bubblegum Babes 5 listed as February 18, 2010.

I have every reason and right to question if it's new content since his other sites have changed formats and as you can see, Bubblegum Babes 5 has a 7 year gap on when it was released between his video site and his regular site. As for when Eve and Jo did scenes together in the mid 2000s, I have at least 9.

06-02-13  11:12pm

Reply To Message

14

exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #11 - Nick Spillum :

On the date one Nick, I didn't so much think it was meant to mislead as it is that I think it makes the site look poorly put together. I really couldn't even come up with a reason why a site would list an update that far ahead of time outside of sloppiness during the programming.

Glad to hear that about Jo. I hadn't seen new content of her anywhere.

I linked to Viv's video site to show that I wasn't just being negative about the reunited set. I'll put the link here too so you can see why I questioned it as a mid-2000s set. Bottom left hand corner.
http://www.vivthomasvideo.com/modelConte...pe=videos&page=6

Looks nearly identical to the vidcap of reunited on I Dream of Jo. As I told the other person, I'm one of the biggest collectors of Eve's content and was genuinely interested in knowing if it was just an old set that had been re-released/recycled. Not to get on Viv's regular site too much, but when they went to the new look and started putting more videos on the regular site, the dates did change a great deal. I used the example in the above reply of one scene that shows as released in 2003 on Viv's video site and shows as released in 2010 on his regular site.

It's also worth mentioning, as you all at Viv's sites probably know, Eve is one of the most recycled models in porn. Her first solo site recycled for nearly 3 years. DDF is still recycling her content on the Eve Angel Official site.

I will reply to your other reply on the one.

06-02-13  11:21pm

Reply To Message

15

exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #1 - thaavi :

thaavi, I never said it's a rip off site. I was asking if the content had been used on Viv's other sites, then reused here. It's a common thing for sites to do. Since I have the majority of the content for Eve from Viv's sites, I wanted to know if I was going to sign-up for I Dream of Jo and end up with a bunch of scenes I already had.
06-02-13  11:52pm

Reply To Message

16

exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :

Hey Pat, I'll probably give it a try since I too like Jo and especially if it has new Eve Angel content. The webmaster seems pretty genuine in what he's saying. The reviewers seem like nearly all other fly by night reviewers, looking for or getting a discount.

I did think that was funny about the November 2013 updates. Someone defended it somewhere on one of these as a "typo". Looking at my keyboard, I don't see how Nov could be a typo from May, maybe on the first letter since those are right beside each other, but the a-o keys are on separate sides. The future date bothered me mainly because Eveangel.com used a similar method when Eve left their site. They just mass removed the sets from 2004 and listed them as 2007 (which was the current year at the time). Maybe Khan at least gets a chuckle out of all this mess!

06-02-13  11:58pm

Reply To Message

17

exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #6 - luv lickn clit :

Agree completely on all of this. I especially love her scenes with Eve. The only model I've seen with better chemistry with Eve was Sandra Shine. Jo also seems to become a bit more kinky with Eve than the other models.
06-03-13  12:00am

Reply To Message

18

thaavi (3) REPLY TO #16 - exotics4me :

Looking for/getting discount? I´m still shocked by the suspicions made on us who are giving true effort...

The November 2013 is a date bug, I already informed the admin, the scenes with this date are already released on the site. So there is no self rip off

06-03-13  07:39am

Reply To Message

19

pat362 (371) REPLY TO #16 - exotics4me :

I like Jo and I also like Eve but ChaseGC's review gave me the info I needed to make an educated choice and her type of content is not going to be enough to satisfy me. I'd rather join a site that has both Jo and Eve videos but also other models and more importantly a little bit of variety. The only thing that seems to vary in her stuff is location and partner. I guess for a super fan or Jo that is enough but I would have wanted her to use toys in some of the videos.

Ah well. I'm sure some people are happy with her site and I really hope we stop seeing useless reviews of her site. There are now 5 reviews and only one is any good.

06-03-13  03:52pm

Reply To Message

20

thaavi (3) REPLY TO #19 - pat362 :

There is variety in locations - very stylish scenes indoors and lots of scenes outdoors (I don´t think any of adult models has so many nice outdoor scenes), variety in models, variety in hairstyle, makeup, clothing (which is very elegant and classy), and there are even some scenes with toys. I wonder what variety is missing. I´m just curious.

I only hope you stop judging other´s reviews, this is very rude to anyone who gives his original and sincere approach that you may don´t like, please don´t be so smartass about this, this is really something useless:)

06-05-13  02:37am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.