Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net (3)

Active
83
Drooler (218) 08-17-07  05:19pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Exclusive pics and vids
+Occasionally large pics option at 1800px from Nov 2005; from then, this size gradually becomes the norm for large over a few months
+SC and HC pics and vids (more often SC)
+Close to 450 different models now, often HOT
+Improved navigation (see below)
+Many ways to browse and access archives by date or model name or type
+Full length videos in mpg, and sometimes avi and or wmv; or segments that show preview screencap on mouseover
Cons: -Four to ten "full sized" pics in the 2-3000px range for many models, but why just those?
-Video segments only in mpg
-Videos OK on 1024x768 monitor, but not HiDef great
-Occasionally unappealing models
-Sometimes photos are too bright, too dark, or overly compressed
Bottom Line: The site has recently undergone a "remodeling job," resulting in better navigation and access to content. Points 1 and 2 in my "Nubiles Quibbles" comments here have been addressed! As for point 3, I haven't hit a bad link in the 2 or so months of update catch-ups I've been doing.

You can now download all small (apprx 1200px) or large (1800px) zips or individual pics straight from gallery pages. They also let you rate the gallery right there while you're in it. And what's more, they've added this feature to EVERY gallery, going right back to their beginnings in March 2004 (at which time, of course, they didn't yet have the larger pics).

Obviously, their webmasters know how to recode masses of pages efficiently, and my hat's off to them.

What's more, the first page a member gets to now displays 10 coming updates followed by 20 current updates and then the 50 most recent models. I do wish they'd put the current updates first, as it's what you'd expect. Still, it's a major improvement over what it was before.

Go further into the site for all of the archives, which are organized in a variety of ways (model names, by yr/month, etc.)

There's also a page of thumbs for the next 80+ coming updates (currently, that's to Sept. 7!)

What the site still needs are better quality & larger images & vids. Why not have 3000 px images as a standard size option instead of just a handful of such pics of each model, none of which are all that special anyway?

Follow-Up:
Just want to add: From the visitor's home page, clicking "updates" leads to ALL of the updates for this site, so you really get a great idea of what's there and some of what's coming. This is an excellent feature that I somehow missed before. Wish every site did this.

Bad news: Toys! Sybians! Vibrators! From the past month, only ONE photoset interested me. I can't see why they are taking this overly worn path. I'm reducing the score.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (11)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Monahan (40) Your review makes it sound like Nubiles is primarily a photo side with some video. Is that the correct impression?
08-17-07  05:25pm

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :

Not exactly. I have the site open right now, and I went to their "video" page (which I'd never done before). There's definitely more softcore than hardcore, but some of the hardcore babes are pretty hot (to me, anyway).

As far as volume is concerned, there's TONS. From the top of that page, I hit the page down key 60 times and the scroll bar had only moved down about 25%. That indicates there's a heap of video.

Just the same, personally, I'm not that into videos, so actually the bias toward the photos is just because I'm biased that way.

Anwyay, hope this helps.

08-17-07  05:34pm

Reply To Message

3

Monahan (40) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

Yes, it helps a lot. I prefer video and softcore so this looks like a good site. I think I'll check it out.

Thanks.

08-17-07  07:43pm

Reply To Message

4

PinkPanther (46) Good review. I've been a member for the first time for approx 1 month. I agree with your score. I find this to be among the best teen sites out there - better than Teen Dreams, not as exciting as ALS Scan.

The volume is impressive, the quality is good, I really like the "future updates" feature, the webmaster certainly cares about the members opinions, as you can tell from his participation in the forum, and I like a lot of the models.

I'm not sure, at this point, if I'll extend my membership between my initial 120-day join period, but I may be back before too long.

08-17-07  09:34pm

Reply To Message

5

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #4 - PinkPanther :

For me, the decision to extend the subscription or not really comes down to just one model that gets way under my skin. With Nubiles, this time it was Georgia, that American brunette that brings Demi Moore to mind. Every time I see that girl (on the net!), I just start melting in my chair.

Then I came out of it, and reluctantly cancelled.

They say that good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement.

08-18-07  01:31am

Reply To Message

6

Denner (233) As Drooler is not a video-guy allow me to make a remark concerning Nubiles and video (although I made a review in May this year):

Video-wise Nubiles is living up to a very good standard. I've been a member since May and the updates and quality of videos are growing. New models keeps comming up and Nubiles even do more hardcore-videos with very cute/sexy teens.

This site keeps getting better and better if you're a fan of teen solo- og hardcore videos - and they continue having a mix of US and european girls.

08-19-07  06:38am

Reply To Message

7

Nubiles Captain (30)
Webmaster
This is the owner of Nubiles. I want to thank every one for their comments, we use them to make the site better. For example, we saw the original comments from the Drooler about the navigation and that is why we changed them.

I am not yet convinced about going to a full 3000 px image size as even on a 1920 x 1200 monitor the large picture size takes up almost the entire screen. However I will keep this idea in mind.

Just this last month we added flash "you tube" style movies encoded at 1000 kb/s for instant watching. They are also in segments for viewing.

Thanks for your feedback.

08-23-07  09:50pm

Reply To Message

8

Nubiles Captain (30)
Webmaster
Can I ask what photoset you did like and if you don't mind. What you didn't like about some of the other recent ones so I can change those in the future?
02-09-08  10:01am

Reply To Message

9

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #8 - Nubiles Captain :

Maybe I should say what I do like and wish there were more of at Nubiles. One example is IMG_7101 of Aimee in her gallery number 3. Lea in her gallery number 2, lea_s2-0066. Kali in her gallery number 4, kali-s4_0064. Personally, that's what I like.

What I don't like is so much masterbation with toys. I've been a returning member to Nubiles because until the past month's time, it hadn't been a problem. Sites that obsess about it, such as OnlyCuties and Teenrotica, I just stay away from. I don't know what happened with Nubiles. If the surge in toying is due to other member requests, I can understand, but ...

Thanks for asking.

02-09-08  02:24pm

Reply To Message

10

Nubiles Captain (30)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #9 - Drooler :

I did take a look at those images and I see they are very hot. One thing I noticed is that those girls don't even do toys at all. Their limits stop at touches herself or explicit nude.

Did you see the first set of the new model Trish image trish-s1_0056.jpg or Loren in set 4 image loren_s4-0099.jpg. I was just trying to go through the recent girls and see sets without toys that had hot shots or at least I thought they were hot.

Do you think the sets should be all without toys or just more than there are now with toys? I find hot images both ways but thats just my taste and I know everyone is different. The hard thing is keeping everyone happy. For example there was a new review today posted here that says
-"Most models only strip"
-"The contents are too soft"
-"It would be nice to see some toy action"
but at the same time others don't want so much of this. Maybe its a good thing actually that I am getting both sides of the story because it shows the Nubiles has variety.

I just am trying to find the right balance to have both hardcore, toy and erotic posing for everyone.

02-10-08  08:49am

Reply To Message

11

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #10 - Nubiles Captain :

Trish is a doll babe, but none of what I've seen of her at Nubiles is quite like the shots I'd already mentioned. I didn't get any of her at Nubiles, and I looked through everything. Loren, sorry, doesn't appeal to me looks-wise.

Keeping everyone happy is a tiring job. I'd prefer no toys at all, but if they're going to be there, I'd really like shots (as I pointed out as examples) in the same galleries, without the toys. Those shots I pointed out are stellar to me because they include the beautiful girl's face, with a nice expression; her head, arms, and butt with no cropping; and they pretty much fill the frame. And there's no problem with blurriness, either. They are exactly what this porn user can never get enough of. (LOL)

I don't know why, but when toys get lots of attention, ass seems to go out the window most of the time, at least the way I like it presented. It's a syndrome in the porn world. Maybe you can buck the trend?

Thanks again.

02-10-08  10:50am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.