Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (3017)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (237)  |   Replies (2664)

Other:   Replies Received (1461)  |   Trust Ratings (83)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 3017 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

LOL. And what has ATK Exotics done lately for Kwanzaa? It's comin' up pretty soon, y'know!

12-21-14  02:39pm

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Picked "other" on this one because it's more of a quality than quantity question to me. There can be heaps of "holiday" (always Christmas or New Years, of course) content available in Dec. and Jan. as far as I'm concerned so long as it appeals.

Over the years, I've collected a pretty good pile of the stuff with "that special holiday rear cheer" in mind. Back when Sophie Paris was active, I now recall, she did some stunning work at Hegre-Art in the red and white. It has traversed several hard drives since then.

Hey, it sure beats seeing stupid ads and the same old Christmassy crap on TV/the Web/print.


12-21-14  04:59am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Given the choices of things lickable, the armpits wouldn't have come to mind had I not seen it on a porn site.

12-17-14  05:34am

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I choose "a fair amount," though my habits have certainly changed. There's often nothing on that I'll watch faithfully as I did in the '70's and '80's, only specials that interest me (in the arts) or documentaries. Most of television is for dolts (reality shows about extra-marital affairs, etc.) or political whiners (Fox/MSNBC).

At least there's PBS! I'm thankful for that.

I read somewhere recently that one network paid about 4 times as much for syndication licensing of "Walker Texas Ranger" than another did for "NYPD Blue." I think that might tell you something about the average viewer.


12-14-14  06:25am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Reminds me of one of those jokes that ends with "Oh, that was just the demo."

I don't know why there are sometimes differences in photo and video content of a scene. Did someone have a fit of uncontrollable coughing during the video? Or, for that matter, while taking the photos? Or did someone simply not give a shit?

I usually preview a scene by looking at the thumbs, so no matter which medium is missing the sought-after juicy bits, it sucks whether they're not there when the download finishes or you never knew that they WERE there.


12-13-14  04:48am

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not even interested in the sporting variety whence the pisser achieves (or attempts to achieve) record distance across a horizontal plane.

12-09-14  12:20pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Sometimes I just want to know what the users say about a site, but if I'm thinking about joining one, I'll head for TBP for all of the nitty-gritty such as described by Monahan.

12-06-14  03:14pm

Reply
8
Visit Nextdoor Models

Nextdoor Models
(2)
Reply of standard's Review

Enjoyed the review. Have been a member a couple of times. It's true what you say about the sameness of the settings and clothes.

Two gripes that I have with the site are 1. the oversized watermark, which sometimes competes with the girl and/or one of her fine features, and sometimes wins, and 2. the excessive repetition of the same or similar poses in galleries that go from 150 pics and up.

But there are girls there I've not seen anywhere else, and some of them are pretty hot.


11-23-14  07:50am

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Same as LPee23; would join once to get the archived stuff. I've done it before.

11-22-14  10:13am

Reply
10
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

Might be interesting to see the responses to a poll using only terabytes as the unit of measure. I've crossed the 4TB mark, for example.

11-16-14  05:58am

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Never, never, never! People would think I was some kinda sex maniac.

11-10-14  04:19pm

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I like the starkness of it, once the preliminaries have been checked off. It's great when the camera angles and editing are good, disappointing as hell when they're not.

11-06-14  04:23pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

Faves are keepers. Downloads are for getting them. Have been going over some stuff not seen for a while and guess what? MORE faves!

11-05-14  04:02pm

Reply
14
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

That's fair enough. It's not surprising that two people would have different views and tastes--and responses--to the same kind of material.

11-03-14  03:35pm

Reply
15
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Excellent review as it is thoughtfully in-depth and informative.

Personally, however, I'm not one to renew with the site just because I really dislike the way Ryan goes about things. I think that of all male performers I've seen, he's one of the most distracting and visible in the scenes, tossing the girls this way and that in a sexual frenzy. He does live what excessive editing and camera cutting would otherwise do post-production. I just can't enjoy watching that kind of porn.


11-02-14  07:28am

Reply
16
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Sometimes I like to watch the "pretext"/beginning and sometimes the foreplay, but I don't watch much of the BJ part. Usually, though, I find exactly where the belly-down backdoor part is first, or the standing backdoor part. The scene will always have one, 'cause I always look through the caps before I decide to download or not.

11-01-14  07:17pm

Reply
17
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

As far as taste goes, it really hasn't changed since I was a strapping young man. Mostly what has become more refined and narrowed is my knowledge of were to find what I like.

10-26-14  03:14am

Reply
18
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I wish there were more softcore material of at least of couple of stars, Whitney Westgate and Natalia Starr. I'll explain.

For one thing, I'm more into photos for softcore. There are "softcore parts" in photosets from Brazzers, Bang Bros., Porn Pros, and similar sites, but they don't do it as well as sites such as ATK Galleria or MetArt. It's just a matter of the style of the shoots.

But it's no big deal.


10-24-14  04:06pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

Dick slaps generally don't bother me. They don't happen that much, in my viewing experience anyway. A guy would have to be masochistic to keep doing it a lot. Besides, I doubt that any penis has the ability to do any real harm, such as bruises or fractures.

So it's the sight of a guy smacking a girl somewhere with his member that must turn some people off. In the face (not the mouth amid oral sex) turns me off, but it's nothing compared to throat grabbing and putting a foot on the girl's face. That's what really chills my blood.


10-19-14  06:05am

Reply
20
N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

78.1 is where mine stands. Anything above that, therefore, should be considered a compliment.

10-18-14  12:55am

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

When it's out of synch, it gives a new twist to "What's Up Tiger Lily?" But that's OK; I usually watch 'em pre-talkies.

10-13-14  07:45am

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I wonder what the purpose of the question is. Is it an inquiry that might lead to a policy of some sort, should the majority seem to be in favor of one? I'm just wondering.

Sometimes I mind if the topic has been brought up before. I ask, "Why start a new thread?" But it's not a big deal. I'll go whatever way things go as far as the forum is concerned.


10-11-14  11:59am

Review
23
Visit Ashley Doll

Ashley Doll
(1)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Ashley is sweet and beautiful
-content is almost entirely exclusive (exception: one huge Hustler gallery)
-navigation is simple and straightforward
-design is simple with a good color scheme
-ample number of pics in each gallery; varies from approx. 80 to over 200
-videos in 4 formats (WMV low (960x540), WMV high (1440x810), iPhone, and iPad)
-fast-moving downloads (1.5-2.5Mbsp)
-reliable billing company: Epoch
-blog and forum are active with Ashley posting/participating, though the forum isn't terribly active on the member end
Cons: -only one file size for pics in zips: huge (4752x3168; sometimes 5184x3456); FYI: enlarged in galleries 1067x1600
-galleries display no more than 15 thumbs per page
-in gallery section, number of pics per gallery and file sizes not stated; in video section, lengths, file sizes, and dimensions of videos not stated
-updates once a week with a photo gallery or video
-15 videos to date
-41 photo galleries to date
-shoots are "professional," which doesn't always mean great
-monthly membership price of US $29.69 will discourage some from joining
Bottom Line: I really liked this site. It's softcore without toys. I knew it was kind of a splurge given the amount of content, but it hasnít given me any buyerís remorse.

Ashley first came to my attention through David Nudes, where she is "Taylor Ashley." She's also appeared at Hustler, Twistys and Met-Art, and even did a bit of b/g hardcore at Exploited College Girls. As she makes clear in her blog, she does not intend to do any more hardcore with males. However, she is bisexual, so who knows if she'll take the g/g route some time?

More on photos: Ashley definitely has a way with the camera, gushing sweetness with her smile and her eyes. She has a nice, trim frame with lovely all-natural boobs and an ass that will make you glad to be alive just to see it. I only wish that the photos didnít have so much hot streaming sunlight coming over her, especially in the indoor shoots by windows, but thereís enough good stuff after that kind have been pitched out.

More on videos: These are mostly posing and smiling and stripping without any music or talk to speak of. There are just a scant few that have her masturbating and moaning, but they are nice.

Clearly, this is a single-model site for the softcore fan with a few extra bucks to reallocate from the beer fund to something thatís gonna last a while longer. With that in mind, I recommend it.

10-11-14  05:10am

Replies (1)
Reply
24
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I click. Therefore, it is.

Usually.


10-09-14  06:50pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If the cameraman really has something worthwhile to say, then fine. It just hasn't been my experience.

10-07-14  11:27am


Shown : 1-25 of 3017 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.61 seconds.