Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (3049)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (240)  |   Replies (2693)

Other:   Replies Received (1466)  |   Trust Ratings (83)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 3049 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I always hear calliope music playing in the background when I see fisting content, along with peeing, object insertions, and elephants standing on their hind legs with balls wrapped around their trunks.

03-26-15  01:10pm

Reply
2
Visit Cherry Pimps Network

Cherry Pimps Network
(0)
Reply of Avalanche's Reply

The reason I said that there wasn't full access to the model sites was because from the "Sites and Niches" menu, which opens up to a page of the sites, each with a photo, access was denied for the model sites. I see now that that has changed. Quite recently, in fact.

Thanks for the heads up on that. Cheers!


03-24-15  06:35pm

Comment
3
Visit Cherry Pimps Network

Cherry Pimps Network
(0)

ChloeAmourXXX

I joined ChloeAmourXXX for 19.95 (1 mo) thru Epoch not knowing it was part of the Cherry Pimps Network. The Chloe site already seems to have stopped updating (mid last month), but the content quality is really good. There are 22 photo sets and of those, 18 corresponding videos. There are only 2 photo sizes: 1024 px and 56xx px for viewing or downloading. There are three hc b/g sets and about as many g/g.

But I found there's more to it. You get access to the CherryPimps site and the CherrySpot site. Pimps has the Spot content plus the live show archives for each girl. There's a lot here. My download speeds (in 19th placed USA) run about 530kbps.

And I've got a few gripes. One, some older photo thumbs don't show, but at least their links still work. Two, the thumbs only show the top half of portrait-oriented photos.

Still, it's a buy for 19.95. (This last paragraph revised after message from site webmaster.)

03-24-15  02:57pm

Replies (3)
Reply
4
N/A Reply of exotics4me's Reply

No, I was thinking of something less complicated, like "Big Alien Dick." After all, we already have "BBC."

03-20-15  12:40pm

Reply
5
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Funny, I also first wondered if the space aliens might be sexually attractive. Why reject them if they can be incorporated into some good porn? And there would be new acronyms like "BAD."

Go ahead. Guess! ;)


03-16-15  06:12pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No, because I don't know what it means to be an average porn surfer.

03-14-15  01:31am

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It depends. And on what? I can't say. Sometimes I just don't care about it, and sometimes I really do.

03-08-15  08:00am

Reply
8
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(1)
Reply of Jay G's Reply

Well, it's probably true that they're related words. I think, for instance, that a rebate is actually a form of "bait."

03-08-15  07:58am

Reply
9
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(1)
Reply of Jay G's Comment

FYI, it's called "bait and switch."

03-07-15  06:02pm

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't think of my personal budget as the benchmark criteria for determining the overvaluation of pornography. But then, who knows? ;)

03-05-15  01:14am

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Pretty much the same as WittyGuy

03-01-15  04:51am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nope. Ain't never done that.

02-27-15  10:27am

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It always depends. I've seen a bit of goofiness for the first time from certain models and found it attractive, but with others, it's not so much. And if it's with food, forget it. Well, probably.

02-25-15  03:17pm

Reply
14
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

I usually power it off between brushing and flossing.

02-22-15  03:49pm

Reply
15
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I haven't been to the RabbitsReviews site in quite some time. But to answer the question: no, and I didn't know that blind banners to it existed in any pay sites.

Should they exist, it doesn't help at all in terms of trusting RabbitsReviews.


02-21-15  03:43am

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Something in my basic brain says, "Find woman not already pregnant!"

02-19-15  02:13pm

Reply
17
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

They'd be perfectly fine if they were realistic enough, meaning that they'd take things personally when there was nothing intentionally personal about a given statement and they'd remind you of something bad that you did five years ago and which hadn't been brought up in all that time.

02-15-15  08:32am

Reply
18
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

To me, paying for a site membership means there are no ads to distract my attention when or after I've logged in. People can feel free to express disagreement with that. Doesn't mean I'll change my mind. Maybe they could change theirs.

02-13-15  02:15pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Well, sometimes I feel a bit like Beldar ("Consume Mass Quantities!"), but the truth is I get the best and then some of the good enough.

"Everything" would take things a lot further, and I've got enough little hard drive friends hanging around my desk already!


02-09-15  04:41pm

Comment
20
Visit Babespotting.tv

Babespotting.tv
(0)

Babe Reposts Spotted

I had a look again at this site today, and they've been recycling some material. I checked my collection from previous subscriptions to make sure.

This is not to warn anyone away from the site, though, especially if they've never joined. It's a good one for lovers of the nude model genre.

02-07-15  08:57am

Replies (0)
Reply
21
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I'll look at the tech specs but, as Jay G points out, hi-def is what you see, which to me is clarity and depth almost to the point of being unreal sometimes. Unreal, probably, because I don't get hi-def as often as I get damn-good-enough-def.

02-07-15  03:22am

Reply
22
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

Other than differences in favorite models, my answer is remarkably close to that of rearadmiral--even the Charlton Heston allusion (minus the gun).

01-27-15  11:25am

Reply
23
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Comment

I also noticed the old Teenrotica content showing up on MC Nudes. They've been doing this since August 2014.

Peeing isn't what I'm into, but the image dimensions are larger, which is good since the TR 2000px max size of yore is actually a problem with the newer higher resolution monitors when you want to zoom in on something special, be it a smile, a nice backside, or, for some, a shaft of gold.


01-22-15  02:11pm

Reply
24
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If there's something good enough at a smaller size, I might skip the humungous one, or I might decide to wait and download later when I have enough time for it. But this doesn't happen that often.

01-21-15  04:50pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I've come across very few sites that will just autologin, but they are nice because it makes for immediate entry.

01-20-15  04:46pm


Shown : 1-25 of 3049 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.54 seconds.