| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
There are elephants that stand on their hind legs. There are dogs that leap through rings of fire. There are trapeze artists flying through the air.
And then there's bukkake ...
|
05-17-13 02:22am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've been really incensed in the past when I thought the thumbnail represented the photo, then found out by paying the site for the content that the model was much smaller in the picture before the cropping.
It's a simple concept: Show us what we're really paying for. (And save on your own time/money continuum by not bothering with cropping.)
|
05-13-13 12:34pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ads are like weeds. They will grow anywhere they can. If I say "a few are OK" then you'll hear my voice fading as I slide down the slippery slope.
To me, having paid for a site membership carries a contractual implication that I've paid for the experience of getting the content without the distraction of ads, just as it is when you pay for an app on your mobile or for a book (the kind with bound, paper pages).
|
05-11-13 02:41pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Probably for the same reason that most men aren't interested in romantic movies or novels, to expand a bit on luv lickn clit's comment. Each gender has its own preferred genre of fiction.
|
05-09-13 11:04am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I read them for reasons given above. To be a little more specific on the wisdom of GI Joe, sometimes there's an important detail that none of the newer reviews have mentioned. The only way to know if that's true is to blow the dust off the oldies and crack the binding. I've never regretted it.
|
05-06-13 04:26pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
It's best to read in variety: "Other."
|
05-03-13 02:24am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
You said it about CNN.com. That and the TV networks (exception: CNN International) are at about the intellectually challenged level of the gossip fare as well. Didn't it use to be a good news source that didn't try to manipulate your emotions (on TV) or trick you into clicking one of those "spammy" links (site)?
Try this weird trick and just avoid it all together.
|
05-02-13 03:45pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, but I still need a pop-through blocker, a pop-in blocker, a pop-around-somehow blocker, and a pop-up-fucking-anyway blocker.
|
05-01-13 04:06pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Barefoot ... and just keep goin'.
I don't usually pay attention to footwear in a porn scene. If I do, it's probably because I'm watching the start of the scene and the girl looks really hot in heels or something.
But I don't usually start at the beginning.
|
04-30-13 03:09pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Ohh, yes, that's right. Her itty-bitty titties remind me of a neighbor girl when she was about 12 or so. Her younger brother, never one too terribly concerned with socially appropriate behavior, suddenly lifted her shirt in front of me one day.
But I like Tanner. I've watched her do all kinds of naughty things. And she's damned cute.
|
04-27-13 08:26am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
I don't think she looks as though she's in the seventh grade, though from what I've read, sometimes she acts like it. ;)
|
04-26-13 05:26pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I actually don't mind the "schoolgirl" schtick per se. It's kind of a fun role play idea when the model is clearly a mature 20-something. Or 30-something. It's like, "Let's pretend we're back in school, and it's time for back in school."
That being said, I've said, to myself, "Whoa. No, no," when I've seen a model who, while being of legal age, looked as though she could be in the 7th grade.
|
04-25-13 05:12pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
Easy question: Baseball. The people who think it's boring just don't understand, and the people who take it too seriously don't either.
|
04-24-13 11:23am
|
Reply
14
|
ALS Scan
(2)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Yes, they're the same. Since I only want a few of the "hi" sized pics, I've resorted to opening the pic, looking at the browser title bar, and using that to get the photo number and just typing it in in place of the super long goobledegook default file "names."
Another weird thing I hadn't mentioned before is that for some reposted sets, the medium and hi sizes are identical, though they are labeled medium and hi (or high, can't recall off hand). So you can download a zip of each and they're really the same size pics.
Anyway, I've liked the photo quality and babes (mostly) at ALS Scan, but with these new changes, along with the addition of hardcore, it's become less appealing.
I'll probably go back some time, but there's no hurry.
|
04-24-13 11:19am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've done it. Once per site.
|
04-20-13 02:05am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Send in the clowns .... (It's another circus act.)
|
04-13-13 04:55am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I'd have my 'druthers on this one, meaning "Others." The others above the other, that is, with the exception of "cool" design. It needn't be cool, just tasteful and easy enough to "process" with the old visual cortex.
For cool, I'll settle for the Miles Davis Quintet, the one with Shorter, Hancock, Carter, and Williams.
|
04-11-13 05:09pm
|
Comment
18
|
Eva's Garden
(2)
|
|
04-05-13 08:28pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Lack of info is a basic problem. A site should let you see what it's got. TorridArt is a good example of a site that does, as are MetArt and Hegre-Art. You can browse the content as a visitor and they tell you the specs on video and photo sizes and video formats available. AND they mention that they got this stuff in zip archives.
Sites that fall sort of such features in their tours are hard to trust. One wonders if they're hiding something or not.
|
04-05-13 07:10pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
My computer sleeps while I'm away, and sometimes I set it to "coma" with the power off.
|
04-04-13 12:14am
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use a download manager when it is more than I can manage on my own, but like some of the respondents above, I like to pick through things, "by hand," as it were, and just keep what I want.
I'd hate to see that my hard drive is 80% full and I wouldn't know where to start my spring cleaning.
|
03-30-13 01:25pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Good question, and if you can tolerate being lied to, just ask my ISP.
|
03-28-13 05:35pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I guess it comes as no surprise that it's hard to define something that is not real.
Had a good chuckle over your comment about Demolition Man, or whatever it was called. (Wonder if there has been a porn parody of that. They could call it "Fornication Man.")
|
03-28-13 05:33pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Put "virtual" in front of any word and it can only mean "not really." Virtual reality is not reality, and virtual sex is not sex. Whether it will be a virtual wave of the virtual future is something that is yet to be virtually seen.
|
03-27-13 01:51am
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I guess I must be a boyey boy, 'cause I like girly girls who are more into cock than Glock.
Actually, weapons of any kind have no appeal to me when there's peeling going on. Sex, to me, is a cooperative activity, without any big hints of dominance, coercion, or rejection.
BTW, I second what RagingBuddhist said. Those worn-out cliches ought to be stuffed into a landfill somewhere.
|
03-24-13 06:23am
|
