Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (218)  

Feedback:   All (2960)  |   Reviews (115)  |   Comments (237)  |   Replies (2608)

Other:   Replies Received (1452)  |   Trust Ratings (85)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 2960 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
1
Visit PJ Girls

PJ Girls
(0)

Good at What It Does

I'm winding up a membership to this site and it's been good for what it's supposed to do, which is focus on Czech pussy in exclusive scenes, using both photos and videos as the media. The models are usually the popular ones; they have reached a population of 80, plus there are four really older ones at the bottom of the list for those who would like ...

The pics come in two sizes, 2400x3600 and 1600x2400. You can also switch viewing sizes in the galleries between those. They're nice and colorful and the girls dress in sexy clothes, though they soon have them off in order to put the assorted instruments of cunt stretching in.

The videos come in two sizes plus they stream. I never downloaded any, but tried streaming one. It was pixelated on my 1920x1080 screen. However, their videos to download also come in that size.

I was hoping for a lot more ass showing on this site (the kind you find at TorridArt, for instance), but none was ever promised, so I'll live with it and make it a one-time join unless the owners would like to give that Czech butt a little more display time. I shall remain at all times ready to worship.

For those who like an ALS-Scans type of approach with not quite as many photos but certainly enough, this site is definitely worth consideration.

07-27-14  03:20pm

Replies (0)
Reply
2
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I made the acquaintance of a hairy-legged women once long ago (like 37 years ago). She lived with another woman in town. Back in those days, it wasn't so easy for girls like them.

07-25-14  07:08pm

Reply
3
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I've got about 15 unused blank CDs. I haven't touched them in at least 2 years. Something must have happened!

07-25-14  07:05pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I actually made up all of the possible terms. Can you believe it? ;)

Hadn't heard of it as "landing strip," nor had I consulted the very reputable (a-hem) Urban Dictionary, which is probably by now more voluminous than the OED.

But back to the real subject at hand: As far as landing on it, I suppose that's OK. At least from there one has a pretty good idea where the hangar is.


07-16-14  04:46pm

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

This is the fourth time this same poll question has been responded to. Currently, with 19 responses (half the votes, approx., of each previous poll), there's been a definite trend away from interest in 3D porn since the first poll in 2011.

I remember in the forum a while back when some people were saying it was the future of porn. Not yet, huh?


07-06-14  04:41pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Most of the stuff I have, even from 12 years ago, I was pretty picky about choosing. Ohh ... another thing: I paid for it.

I'll usually just view it in a smaller screen.


07-04-14  02:56pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Wittyguy and Khan understood the question. Thanks for the clarifications for those who did not.

07-03-14  02:46pm

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I actually like to see some of them up close if they look nice, but even if there never were any closeups of them, I can't say I'd mind too much.

06-29-14  05:04am

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The score reflects how much the reviewer recommends the site, and that's all based on the question "Is it worth it?"

Imagine two sites that are pretty equal in all respects except for price; it would make sense for the lower-priced one to get a higher score.


06-25-14  05:32pm

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

For those who don't understand the question, I'm sorry. I'd like to explain it to you ... but I don't have any crayons.

06-25-14  05:22pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Unwitting yet brilliant -- must be a natural.

06-22-14  05:12am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Somehow it seems that a boycott of a company that makes underwear has more chances of success than a boycott of a porn website with a webmaster of dubious character and/or unpleasant personality.

Guys slip into their briefs, it seems, for qualitatively different reasons than they click "join," even if they know the webmaster is a wretched troll.

And usually disputes with webmasters are more isolated and interpersonal. They don't incite the kind of activism that happens when outsourced textile workers are shut out of the factory after forming a union.

It's probably because there's a lot more at stake.

Well, at least we have our reviews ...


06-21-14  04:51pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Four if we don't count the ones that died and are "buried" on the premises. It's nice how they come right in their own little box.

06-19-14  12:07pm

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I feel that a review has to be written in prose, but the standard format for pro's and con's here is bullet points. That doesn't necessarily easy, because you have imply analysis based on what you expect people to want to know. Still, the bottom line I find harder to do if I really want to write it well.

If I don't give much of a squat, then there's no big difference. It all comes out like it's from a semi-automatic firearm: bullet, bullet, bullet ...

Lazy reviewers are actually better for lazy readers, anyway.


06-13-14  04:34pm

Reply
15
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

"Normal Clothes" is a broad category, but of course it is. To me, it's anything the model might be wearing that I might see a girl wearing on the street or at a social gathering, which could be business attire (the boss or the secretary), an evening gown, a summer dress, winter wear, fall fashions, or a pair of cotton shorts and a cut-off T-shirt.

It's a real turn-on to see them getting out of such things. Lingerie's OK, but honestly, it's more of a turn-on in real life.


06-03-14  01:51pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

Das Bukkake, that's hilarious.

05-30-14  05:35pm

Reply
17
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Bukkake requires a collectivist mentality. It is porn that slips and slides the viewer towards Communism. It is its last hope, and it will fail in its mission.

05-30-14  10:24am

Reply
18
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I always read it as an intentionally vague yet positive sounding phrase. It might appeal to those who think with ... well, not their brains.

It means "not every day," because if they did update every day, they'd say that and it wouldn't matter which organ the potential customer did the cognitive processing with.

A trip to PU or TBP would be a requirement before I'd considering joining.


05-28-14  05:40pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Thanks for taking the time to give me a load of info about ChromeBooks. I appreciate it.

05-24-14  02:34pm

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Oh, sure. And then I'd be getting, "You're kidding me. I've never seen them get their pussy lips done!"

BTW, I noticed recently that one of my favorite models/pornstars had hers done, and it really kind of upset me. I won't say who it is, but, again, wasn't needed!


05-18-14  01:17pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Most models don't look better after such surgery; many look worse!

About the only one I can think of who still looks OK after it is Monique Alexander, but she didn't need it. In fact, none of them need it because they're already good-looking enough. It's a risk to their appearance that they shouldn't entertain.


05-18-14  06:20am

Reply
22
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I wonder how the apps are on the Chromebook, esp. regarding Microsoft Office compatibility. (I hope the world will eventually move on to another standard, and thus really have standards, but I don't see it happening quite yet.)

Compatibility with Office, esp. Word, Excel, and PPT have been my biggest holdback on diving further into the newer portables. Have had a hell of a time with Apple stuff since they no longer play nice with Office (and vice versa).


05-17-14  03:23am

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I hate it when I see the thumbnail showing the subject filling the space, but then the actual photo has her dwarfed by a tree or a wall or something like that.

WYSIWYG ("What you see is what you get") is the best policy, besides being an avenue to self-awareness.


05-15-14  01:42pm

Reply
24
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

I wouldn't know what to think. Just seeing it isn't enough to judge.

05-04-14  07:29am

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

They are minor flaws most of the time in my experience. Some of the ladies have really lovely skin, and I mean in the videos.

Probably the most annoying flaw to me is ass rash. But I don't see that a lot. And when I do see it, it builds character -- in me.


05-01-14  07:32pm


Shown : 1-25 of 2960 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.47 seconds.