Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

If other aspects are about the same, would you vote for or against a candidate with a clear position that adult industry should be regulated?

Type: General

Submitted by asmith12 (124)
Definitely for 3% 1 Votes
Probably for 3% 1 Votes
Not a factor for me 21% 7 Votes
Probably against 29% 10 Votes
Definitely against 44% 15 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

34 Votes Total

Sep 27, 2009

Poll Replies (13)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Capn (28) In my country there is quite sufficient regulation.
Further intrusion would not be welcomed.

09-27-09  01:43am

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (220) Same as what the Capn said. We have to prevent child pornography, but there are already sufficient measures in place for that. A candidate running with more regulation clearly as part of the platform would probably be of a political persuasion at odds with mine.
09-27-09  01:48am

Reply To Message

3

james4096 (126) Hypothetically speaking, if indeed that were the only big difference I had with the candidate, I might still vote for him. But like most people I normally end up voting for the lesser of two evils.
09-27-09  05:17am

Reply To Message

4

kkman112 (12) There seems to be plenty of competition, so there does not seem to be a need for regulation. I'm assuming you mean if a candidate would want to ban porn, in that case I would not vote for him/her. Considering the porn industry is almost as big as the movie industry (at least in the US), I don't see it going away here at any time. Now in other countries... depends on the governments. Some have already started wars against porn while a few others are starting to allow it.
09-27-09  05:35am

Reply To Message

5

pat362 (369) I said probably against mostly because politicians running for office and having anywhere in their
platform the mention of porn are more likely to have a negative view of it. It's not to say that they aren't watching porn or are of a much greater morale than the rest of us. Seeing all the sex scandals coming out definetely takes them out of the upper morale level. I don't think that any
politican having any positive biew on porn is ever going to get elected to any level of government.

I don't know if you heard but a town manager in Florida got fired because he's married to a porn star. Politics and porn don't go well together.

09-27-09  08:46am

Reply To Message

6

PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :

Unless you're in Italy
09-27-09  10:30am

Reply To Message

7

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #6 - PinkPanther :

Yeah! Cicciolina/Ilona Staller has proved that. While a member of the Italian parliament, she offered herself to Saddam Hussein if he would free hostages. She's also offered herself to Osama Bin Laden.

Puts a new twist on "giving back to the community."

09-27-09  01:28pm

Reply To Message

8

turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #6 - PinkPanther :

Yeah, you got love Italy. It seems as if their politicians can go around and have affairs without the same problems as in the U.S.
09-27-09  03:35pm

Reply To Message

9

messmer (137) I'm for regulating Banks and Stock Brokers, that's about it!
09-27-09  04:00pm

Reply To Message

10

badandy400 (103) With regulation comes control and access denial. It would not take long for the only thing we can see is what those in control want us to see. For those in control there would be too much temptation to gain power and support from as many groups as possible. If you want church votes it certainly does not hurt to be the guy who got ride of the church's only legal competition. If no currently laws are being broken then allow people to do what they will.
09-27-09  07:54pm

Reply To Message

11

Capn (28) REPLY TO #7 - Drooler :

Well, that is s lot friendlier than sending troops in! ;0)
09-28-09  10:36am

Reply To Message

12

uscue (39) What kind of regulation? You mean in a negative way or positive way? Porn can be regulated to make it safer for the performers, or it can be regulated to take away our individual freedoms of choice in what we watch. I'm guessing you were talking about negatively, but I didn't vote just in case. But all things equal, I'd vote for a candidate that is FOR PORN
09-28-09  05:21pm

Reply To Message

13

pat362 (369) REPLY TO #6 - PinkPanther :

Yes that's trye. I didn't think about that one. I don't know if she's still in politics but Cicciolina did get elected to office.
I'm just not sure at what level or the exact position.

09-28-09  06:16pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.