Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

Have you watched so many porn videos that erotic pictures can no longer arouse or "get you off"?

Type: General

Submitted by Duante Amorculo (0)
Yep, definately 14% 7 Votes
Getting there 14% 7 Votes
Maybe 16% 8 Votes
Not sure 0% 0 Votes
No, not exactly 22% 11 Votes
No, abosutely not 33% 16 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

49 Votes Total

Jul 29, 2009

Poll Replies (16)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) I'm not sure what the difference is between "Maybe" and "Not sure". Both answers seem about the same to me. Anyway, it definitely takes more eroticism in a picture to arouse me than it did when I was a teenager.
07-29-09  12:46am

Reply To Message

2

Jay G (65) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

Not exactly for me means some pictures that used to turn me on don't anymore. I need prettier girls, more action, more passion now than years ago. A girl in a swimsuit could get me off years ago....not so often now.
07-29-09  05:02am

Reply To Message

3

james4096 (126) I'm a not exactly too. Like what Jay G said.
07-29-09  05:45am

Reply To Message

4

Denner (233) The answers could use some closer definitions - but still a fine poll.
This user is a video-freak - started up browsing porn many years ago when for exampel Persian Kitty first started - AND at a time when videos where in a lousy quality. (before that - my former girlsfriend and me liked to watch 8 mm - especially Swedish Erotica - US-made, BTW).
So for years I've had tons of photosets - but when the video-deal got better, I turned to that.
Now - and for the last 3-4 years my main interest is videos - solo and hc/bg - the old style one on one - pretty conservative there.
Still can get exited by some rare/really fine photosets - especially of newer models - and here MetArt is one of the best (but, alas - their videos are not worth much).

07-29-09  05:52am

Reply To Message

5

GCode (101) I'm in the getting there stage. While I enjoy photography from sites, I'm already to the point that the artsy stuff like MetArt does not get me aroused at all. While I can appreciate the vision and what they are, as far as getting me aroused I can fully say that I need harder stuff for that. Clearly, I'm sure this is from just seeing harder content (either softcore or hardcore) in general so much. However, even the harder softcore stuff (I.E. ALS Scan) are getting a bit on the boring side for me as well. But, not fully, somedays I can look at some of my favorite models in photography and really get excited (for a lack of a better term). Although, during these times, I usually will start with the pictures but I always end up watching videos of the model or sets eventually.
07-29-09  10:00am

Reply To Message

6

Lionheart (47) I need videos to get the job done while some pictures can turn me on it's not when I was younger looking at playboys, i don't think playboys can turn me on anymore
07-29-09  02:07pm

Reply To Message

7

Drooler (220) I don't know how many porn videos it would take for me to become desensitized from erotic pictures, but it hasn't happened yet, and I've watched quite a few and have quite a collection!

In fact, my interest in videos (mostly hardcore) tends to wax and wane, while softcore photos remain a constant source of arousal.

Thus, the premise of the question posed just doesn't jibe with this user's experience over the years.

07-29-09  04:33pm

Reply To Message

8

pat362 (371) I suspect that I've seen too many videos to think that sexy pictures similar to a Playboy spread can get me aroused. It might peak my interest but I'd want more than just the tame picture. In return a good erotic story still gets me hot.
07-29-09  06:55pm

Reply To Message

9

exotics4me (463) It mainly depends on who the model is for me. Some models can make a photo set very sexy with their expressions. I've always thought Gemma Massey was one of the best at this. The opening pictures of her sets she has a curious but shy look, this goes on to become playful, then she can turn it on to come get me now levels. I don't think I will ever change in that sense. It is probably the same reason I prefer solo videos, I get those same feelings from the models and their expressions.
07-29-09  09:13pm

Reply To Message

10

Monahan (42) REPLY TO #7 - Drooler :

Ditto that except that well produced softcore videos can really get my motor going as well. Generally, most photos no longer get my interest except when they are of my A list babes and are taken by a true pro.
07-29-09  10:19pm

Reply To Message

11

PinkPanther (46) If anything, pics get me off even more, for some reason - cause I have so many scenarios to apply my imagination to
07-29-09  11:07pm

Reply To Message

12

turboshaft (24) Tastes change, and therefore arousal does as well.

For me, it isn't necessarily dependent on the format -- photo, video, or whatever -- but really the eroticism. And it's not desensitization, but a change in the eroticization of one thing over another. For example, I used to like hardcore content more than softer, solo girl stuff, but now it's the opposite. I was never desensitized, just re-sensitized to something different, and I can only guess what the future holds (hopefully fewer anti-porn laws?).

Of course, sometimes it is the format, and I simply like seeing certain things certain ways. Though I don't like hardcore as much as I used to, I would prefer to see it in video, instead of in a photo shoot. But I prefer solo, and sometimes girl-girl content, in photos more than video. A hot girl (or two) can really shine in a well shot photo set, but can come off like a real bitch or a real bore in a video.

07-30-09  10:00pm

Reply To Message

13

turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #6 - Lionheart :

(This also applies to pat362's reply.)

I have never been a fan of Playboy for the women -- too much smoke, and not enough fire. I have to give the editors and writers credit for making a magazine that has naked women in it (well, usually partially naked at least) but I still prefer the articles!

07-30-09  10:07pm

Reply To Message

14

Duante Amorculo (0) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

I intended "maybe" to mean an unsure probably and "not sure" to mean the opposite (an unsure probably not).
07-31-09  12:16am

Reply To Message

15

indybt30 (6) I have been getting off to porn for 25 years and it has never failed to arouse me. Having said that sometimes it doesn't arouse me to the point that I just HAVE to masturbate.

I will have to say that it does seem like you get a little desensetized. It seems like after awhile you have seen pretty much everything there is to see.

07-31-09  06:51pm

Reply To Message

16

dracken (246) For me it's all about the girl in the scene, how passionate she is, how good looking and so on. Sometimes small things like a smile as she takes her top of do it more than a whole video. I have a few favorites from a wide range of genres (softcore photo shoots, even non-nude ones as well as hardcore bondage stuff)...but so far I have never been bored by porn, only bad quality porn :)
08-09-09  02:52pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.