Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit In The Crack

In The Crack (1)

Active
85
mbaya (356) 03-14-09  03:19pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-Stunningly beautiful girls. Some of the best on the internet. The girls are from the US, Canada, Hungary or the Czech Republic and the scenes are shot in those locations also.
-Huge site. Despite not being part of a network, there is really a lot here. There are 271 updates, each is about 3 to 6 clips of between 3 to 15 minutes. Some are longer.Three download options, only WMV.
-Nice text description and screenshot for each video. Truly helpful.
-Most videos can be downloaded as almost 1080i HD 1280x720 or 1080p superior HD 1920x1080. This is truly great quality and as good as any site I have ever joined-very highly recommended.
-High quality photo sets for each update.
Cons: -No search engine. Just like FTVgirls, the updates are listed in order. There are multiple videos and photo sets for each girl, but no easy way to find all of them. The so called search engine doesn't function well. It looks for keywords in the text describing each video. If you look for "black" you may get "black dress" or "black earrings" etc. Not helpful if you want to find all the peeing videos or the strip ones.
-No support for download managers. Very slow tedious downloads if you have to look at descriptions of easily 1000 videos and then download the ones you want one at a time.
-No ethnic, age or bodyshape variety. I found two Asian models and two Black ones.
Bottom Line: The site has solo girl videos (there are also a few lesbian videos that are ok) that focus on either stripping, displaying assets, masturbation, looking inside with a speculum, or peeing. Most videos showcased their pussy or ass or both, but some focused on their face or moving erotically while fully clothed. Nice mix that provides some variety.

While I did not find all of the videos to be my taste, there are lots and lots of scenes to choose from.

The girls on the site are professional models, and a few are pornstars. This is both a big plus as well as a minus. The plus is that they are quite attractive, are well made up and know how to move erotically. They manage to not look like typical pornstars-no fake boobs, only a few fake blonds, no fake moaning or overacting.

Generally they play up to the camera in a sensual way that works well. Picture a girl pushing her pussy right in your face and then opening her lips to show you what's inside. By looking directly at the viewer, they generally create a personal link that can be very appealing as well as arousing. The minus to professionals is that they are totally dispassionate and are just doing a job. No enthusiasm, no feeling of daring exhibitionism as you would get with real non pro amateurs. The camera work is close to perfect. I feel most porn camera work is terrible and hurts more than helps videos. Here it is done right.

Specifically, the shots are straight ahead, no diagonals except for the earliest videos. Next each video starts with a focus on whole girl and only gradually moves in for closeups. This is a slow process that creates a buildup to the best parts at the end. Many times I preferred the buildup to the the extreme closeups.

The sets are a big plus also. Most sites use a house, even a hotel room. Here you get outdoors in the Virgin Islands or great homes in the Czech Republic, for example. Makes for a very professionl, polished, well planned video.

The only reasons for not giving the site an even higher score is the lack of a search engine, the lack of support for download managers, and the lack of variety in the models. It is very good for what it is, but it cannot be described as all that I hope for in a 90 level website. Overall a very creative and interesting way to showcase solo models that I hope other sites imitate.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (15)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

ControllingMind (Disabled) Great, this site is on my rapidly expanding 'to join' list, so I was hoping a respected member would do a current review.

The only thing I really dislike is the lack of DL manager support. I would still try the site once tho.

Just one question - What format are the downloads xvid avi, wmv or the dreaded MP4?

03-14-09  04:11pm

Reply To Message

2

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #1 - ControllingMind :

The video has no other option than WMV. Please post how you like the site after you join.
03-14-09  06:36pm

Reply To Message

3

ControllingMind (Disabled) REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :

Thanks, yep I will do.
03-14-09  06:45pm

Reply To Message

4

Monahan (38) All sites operated by Dev8, including this one, are summarized at indexxxed.com so if you want to search all scenes for a specific model on a specific site (or all sites) you can go to indexxxed.com. It's a free site, BTW, and a place to go to find trailers for every scene on every site operated by Dev8.
03-14-09  09:13pm

Reply To Message

5

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #4 - Monahan :

Good to know, so thanks a lot. I just looked and don't see this site listed. TBP does not say anything about DEV8, but says it is from Charisma.com. Are you sure?
03-14-09  11:24pm

Reply To Message

6

Monahan (38) REPLY TO #5 - mbaya :

OOPS. The similarity of this site to Ass Traffic and similar sites screwed me up.

Indexxxed.com is not related at all to In The Crack or to Charisma.

Sorry about that.

03-15-09  11:12am

Reply To Message

7

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #6 - Monahan :

Thank you for your response. The style of the sites is quite different. Dev8 feels Eastern European, eurobabes approach. This feels like something else in its style, because it is Canadian. Culture has a feel to it that is intangible. It just comes across in a different way.
03-15-09  12:58pm

Reply To Message

8

Monahan (38) REPLY TO #7 - mbaya :

I've got In the Crack on my long list (it's over my max of $30) of sites to check out once I win the lottery and don't care about price any longer and it's in there with the Dev8 sites (they are all $30) in the high interest group. But I'm still checking the sites that are under $25 which are, by and large, quite good.

Because I've only checked out the preview site (gotta love Andie Valentino's super hi-def sample-1920x1080 (1080p) full HD) I really don't know much about the In The Crack site except what I see there. Dev8 provides a lot more opportunity to sample their stuff and I agree with you about the feel being European. (I believe, based on the TBP review, but do not know, that Dev8 Entertainment, Ltd. is a British Virgin Islands company.)

03-15-09  01:37pm

Reply To Message

9

turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #8 - Monahan :

Yes, I was surprised mbaya did not mention price in his review -- $35 is not exactly cheap, despite how beautiful their content is. Even if they had better search functions, I would still give them a score in the 80s with their current price.
03-15-09  02:33pm

Reply To Message

10

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #8 - Monahan :

Please feel free to ask about whatever you need more information about. As you may have noticed I rarely give high ratings to sites. I feel the content is especially good, except for the lack of variety in the models. The videos play at least as well on my tv as does my fiber optic cable. I also agree the tour is not much of a sample.
03-15-09  04:29pm

Reply To Message

11

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #9 - turboshaft :

I feel the price is fine considering the quality and quantity. I have never paid this much for a site, so I was also skeptical. In spite of its flaws, this is one of the best investments I have ever paid for porn.
03-15-09  04:34pm

Reply To Message

12

turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #11 - mbaya :

Yes, you definitely get your money's worth for the first month, but after that it seems like a small discount or something would be in order if you were to continue as a member.

Their content does seem like a pretty good investment though, because even as HD video and hi-res photos become the standard, their older stuff is still unique enough and decently shot to be worth saving.

03-16-09  02:02pm

Reply To Message

13

turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #10 - mbaya :

Though they don't really offer a lot to sample, I love how you can browse through their whole collection for free and read the video descriptions. I still check their site to see which videos have certain material when I am about to watch them. I just wish they would say what is also included in the photoshoot section (might entice me to join again, since I do love their photography).
03-16-09  02:06pm

Reply To Message

14

littlejoe (23) great review. im signing up once my ftv account stops

how does it stop you from using a download manager such as flashget?

06-28-09  10:02pm

Reply To Message

15

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #14 - littlejoe :

I can't remember if flashget was a problem. When you sign up and check it out please post so others will know. I hope you like the site.
06-29-09  07:36am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.