Your review was quite complete and makes me interested in joining.
A few weeks ago I spent a week in Quebec City. The Boardwalk near the Frontenac Hotel was so crowded that it took maybe fifteen minutes for the crowd to thin out enough for a photo of it. That hotel is the most photographed location in a city that is full of historic sites and is like a museum. I can't imagine how they could shoot a porn scene there. That takes guts. I also saw the horse drawn carriages as they are everywhere.
I thought the local young ladies were mostly very attractive and would make for good porn models, as long as they did not go overboard on the poutine.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
-Bill through Epoch
-Full access one day trial is only $1
-HD quality videos are 1280x720, about a half hour long
-Photo sets are zip downloadable
-Very attractive models
-Only 18 videos. Preview page shows 32
-Anal is not the focus, but is in every scene
-Only one download option for videos, two for photos.
-Photos are screenshots
-Photos are 1050 x590 low quality
-Photos are only landscapes with no portraits
This review is of the one day trial for only $1. At that price this website is a steal. In stark contrast, I would not recommend joining at the full price of $24.87. As it is a standalone site with no network access, I would never pay that much for so few videos.
The videos are made by the same people as Team Skeet, yet it is not part of that network. The quality is very nice at 1280x720, but there are no other download options. I would hope for 1920x1080 or even 4K.
The photo sets are mere screenshots and seem to be an afterthought. At 1050x590, the quality is not there and they did not think that a few portrait photos would have been a plus.
The models are uniformly attractive and are late teens to early twenties in appearance. The site does not list or tell their ages nor does it tell you where they are from. They appear to be Eastern European, maybe Russian. There is zero dialog in any of the scenes. There is no way to do any searching.
I suspect that the site is stripped down from what you would get at the full join price. I found only 18 videos, but the preview page shows 32, as well as additional download options. The May 13th review by “The Paysites” mentions 35 videos. The preview page mentions that discounts were available for other sites, but I did not see any.
It mentions that there are weekly updates, but the ones that I saw were undated.
For $1 you get 18 well done videos of very attractive young ladies doing anal. There were no circus tricks and nothing extreme or rough. I would not have minded if they had scenes like this, but yet this site was well worth the join price. For $1 I can overlook some minor criticisms.
Since there was no download limit, I got all the videos in less than the one day access that I paid for.
I have recently been a member of Nude Sport Videos from the same parent company. I would expect the videos and photos to be of excellent quality. 1280x720 is quite sharp and the older videos have been remastered. Special Exam looks like a nice, quality site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
-Top notch models. Many are well known porn stars. Some others are doing their very first porn scene here.
-HD 1280x720 quality videos for an incredible past eight years worth of updates.
- 1029 videos and a photo set for each one.
-Nice mix of ages and ethnicities.
-Easy cancellation through the website.
-Photo sets are not zip downloadable.
-Photos don’t capture the action well.
-Photos from the most recent update are only 1200x800
-No 4K quality video downloads
This is a website from Kink.com, which puts out some of the highest quality porn. The video quality, attractiveness of the female models and camerawork are consistently top notch.
This site is one that I have never joined before, although I have been a member of most of their other ones.
I was not sure if I would enjoy videos of solo action, as that really does not appeal to me. My major complaint about other solo action sites is that the models are acting and do masturbation by the numbers. This type of scene would be totally too fake for my taste.
In contrast, this site is real, and I mean VERY real and there is no acting. The models cannot fake what goes on here. Porn stars are generally very jaded from doing so many scenes and not much gets them off. This site does that and more and in spades. Even the most skeptical viewers will find the videos focus on genuinely getting the models off.
They end up drenched in perspiration from the intensity of the action and are literally shaking. Most times they have multiple orgasms. Believe it or not, one scene is advertised as having 57! It is true as I counted them. No acting even in that scene and definitely no attempt at faking it.
What exactly do you get here? The videos show a kind of machine similar to a power drill, but with various sized dildos mounted on them. Sometimes they use two or three of them at a time. One scene even has four. There are several different machines and various sizes of dildos, ranging from normal size to huge. There is mostly vaginal penetration, but some scenes are anal only and many are of double penetration. There is even a scene or two with penetration vaginally, anally and one going in and out of her mouth.
Often niche sites tend to be formulaic and that can be a turn off here too. However, there are scenes that involve light bondage and feature more than one model. A few scenes were shot in Japan and have a different feel to them. Most of the models are familiar porn stars, but some are newbies who have never done porn before. There is a nice mix of ethnicities and ages. The site does not get stale as much as you might think.
The site started in 2000 and updates every seven days, so there is plenty to see here. I counted a massive total of 1029 videos. The oldest are of lesser quality as you would have expected, but are still watchable. The photo sets are not zip downloadable and not very interesting, as they do not capture the action well. Oh well, no site is perfect.
I was pleasantly surprised that I really enjoyed the action here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
- The best quality video download option is 4320p 8000k. This is considerably better than the usual 1080 HD.
- Photos come in at 1920x2880 Exceptionally sharp and clear. There is a photoset for each video.
-Updates are once a week, which is fine for a specialty niche site.
-There is a discounted monthly join price of $14.95 through the TBP link. This is not mentioned on TBP.
-Part of a network of 46 BDSM/spanking/fetish websites.
-Very repetitious. Each scene is a clone and all that changes is the model. A few times the male talent changes, but mostly it is the same man over and over. The same set, the same dialog, the same action.
-There are so far only 20 videos. A year from now this site will be MUCH bigger.
-The photos are screen caps and there is no zip download option.
-Nearly every model has tattoos and some have a lot. This is a major turnoff for me.
-Much of the network is no longer updating. Those sites have been dormant for some time and have very low, unwatchable quality videos. I found the network of little value.
Before I say anything further, I want to thank fellow PUer Pyrenees for mentioning this site. Without him I would not have known that this site existed. He is truly a man of vast knowledge about porn.
Just so it is clear where I am coming from, I am not a fan of BDSM or fetishes. I do like forceful sex though. The BDSM seen here is no comparison in roughness to some sites, in fact it is BDSM done rather lightly. Kink does much harder scenes. As far as rough sex I would say it is at the mid level and no comparison to many harder sites, for example Face Fucking/Facial Abuse.
Every scene follows the same scenario, even at times the same script. The model comes for an interview. There is a very tame casting tape and then there is a lengthy discussion as to what she wants for her future in modeling. She is asked to strip down to her bra and panties. At that point she refuses to take those off and the casting agent gets agitated and ties her hands with rope he conveniently has in his back pocket. He then takes off her bra and panties, He fingers her and forces her to suck his cock, followed by vaginal. There is never any anal on this site.
The scenes are generally quite passionless. In the PU website review by AK he states that “Those concerned with the reality aspects will be happy to hear that the acting isn’t good enough to make anyone think that the scenes aren’t completely choreographed”. The models never act surprised and generally just go with the flow as events unfold.
The reason that I mention this is that Ava Taylor has stated that her scene here convinced her to leave porn. In that scene, she shows a degree of discomfort, but never surprise. She has claimed that she was lied to by the site ownership and that it was to be a simple blow job scene. This may be true, as I just don’t know. All I see is a scene where she is passively just very accepting of whatever is happening. Next issue. If they lied to her then what about the other models? In some other scenes the models sometimes seem into the action, agreeing by saying “Yes Master” and “Ok I will do what you want“. In some scenes the models seem emotionally uninvolved and passive. Do they lie to models as to what to expect during their scenes? It is unclear. Apparently they told them something about what to do as the scenes are virtually choreographed clones.
I would have given the site a higher score, but there are two major negatives. With only 20 videos it is simply too small. The other negative is the number of tattoos to be found here. There is enough ink to write a book.
Although I check it doesn't matter, I should qualify that. When reviewing a weak website, it may be hard to find pros and the bottom line may not have much to say either. I find reviews of weak sites to end up as short.
There still is a full access three day trial for $9.95. I see the newest videos are in high quality 1280x720 and about half of the older videos have been remastered to 1280x720. Being remastered, they are not as sharp as those being shot now.
The site has only a small handful of low quality, short videos. I downloaded everything in five to ten minutes. I contacted CCBill for a refund and they refused. I wrote to the webmaster and they never answered. Not at all recommended. The bonus sites were low quality scenes from DVD's. Many, maybe mostly broken links that took multiple tries to download. Nothing I downloaded was worth keeping. The 70 that it got from Duke is way too high.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
-New updates every other day.
-561 videos, about 7 minutes each. The site is decent size and actively growing.
-The 2015 videos have 5 download choices with the best quality being 4K.
-The biller is CCBill. Trusted and reliable.
-The models talk to you, but not while they are actually stripping.
-No download limits.
-The 4K videos did not play in Windows Media Player. They did play using VLC, but with severe stuttering.
-All videos have music that is either hip hop or techno crap. I found this distracting as well as too loud.
-All videos have the same sequence: blouse, skirt, bra, panties. Too formulaic.
-The photos are 1600x900 low quality screenshots. Only 103 photosets compared to over five times as many videos. I saw only landscapes and no portraits. Very uncreative.
-Far too many models are either fake blonds or have excessive tattoos.
-Zero ethnic variety, with only white British models. Other UK based websites include black or Indian models. None from any other European countries either.
As I discovered “Bopping” means dancing. This website specializes in videos of British women stripping while dancing. Most if not all are porn stars.
The models are all white, with no ethnic variety. On other UK based sites, I have seen black or Indian models and I would expect the same here. There aren’t any from other European countries either.
Far too many of the models have tattoos, which is most definitely not to my taste. In some cases the tats are small and not distracting, but there are many that have so many that it is a major deal breaker. Not hot in my book. There are also a pretty fair number of fake blonds, also not my taste. When you factor in that there are other models that I simply don’t find appealing, you start with 146 models and only about half interest me at all. There are 561 seven minute videos so that leaves about 250 to 300 or so that I like. That is a good number that includes some knockout models who know how to make stripping truly erotic.
The videos are very sharp, with the most recent coming in at 4K. Unfortunately, I could not get these 4K videos to play on Windows Media Player, but they did using VLC, but with stuttering. In all fairness, HD 1920x1080 works for me so I did not care much.
The photos are zip downloadable, but are only screenshots at 1900x600. Only landscapes and not worth saving.
The models strip out of costumes such as nurse, flight attendant, policewoman, construction worker, student, cheerleader, maid, or office worker. Some strip out of ordinary everyday clothes too. Only a very small number strip out of a bikini or other stereotypical stripper clothes. I liked the choices of costumes.
However, the sequence is always the same: Top or blouse, bottom or skirt, bra, panties. An occasional other sequence would have been hotter. There are very few videos that offer any teasing previews, such as showing panties while still wearing a skirt. Too formulaic and the videos could have easily been improved. Typical problem with porn as they get a great idea, in this case stripping, and then the creative process stops.
I like that the models talk to you and even give jerk off encouragement. Nice interaction wit the viewer. I love hearing them talk as you get a break from the music, which is mostly hip hop or techno crap and played too loud.
For me the bottom line here is that the videos that work are excellent, but could be a little more explicit. In spite of the many videos that do nothing for me, many are quite excellent. With updates every other day the site is growing and I would recommend joining in spite of some glaring weaknesses.
There is now a download limit of 20GB a day. The best quality videos are generally over a GB and some as much as three. At that rate it would take more than a monthly subscription to download them all. Further, there are numerous broken links that cause failures to get the entire video. I have complained that some days I get as few as three or four videos. Customer service has told me that there is nothing they can do to correct this. BEWARE!!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.