Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

Should a girl be allowed to wear protective eyewear while jerking a guy off?

Type: Content

Submitted by lk2fireone (194)
Cumshot to the eye is a no-no 33% 18 Votes
Eye cumshot is natural lube 19% 10 Votes
If it's designer goggles 7% 4 Votes
OK to do with skanks 4% 2 Votes
OSHA should require this 6% 3 Votes
Don't really care 31% 17 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

54 Votes Total

Feb 13, 2009

Poll Replies (17)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

badandy400 (103) I can not say that I ever gave this one much thought. I am not a cum shot fan, so it does not matter much to me. I will say that in most scenes eye protection would look pretty retarded though.
02-13-09  12:29am

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (220) She should be allowed to hold one of those little battery-operated fans over her face so it'll make the stuff fly all over the room.
02-13-09  02:11am

Reply To Message

3

Colm4 (10) Though wearing protective gear for this purpose does look a bit stupid, I do think that the guy should not aim for the eyes.
I think it hurts pretty bad for the girl.

02-13-09  02:37am

Reply To Message

4

ramscrota (12) Most scenes the girls usually have their eyes shut, don't they? I think that's the best way around it. Goggles & protective ghar looks stupid, and rob the shot of it's erotic clout.
02-13-09  04:10am

Reply To Message

5

lk2fireone (194) I've seen some pretty stupid-looking goggles that girls were wearing in some photoshoots. But instead of having her eyes closed, this way the girl can better see what she's doing. So, designer goggles is the way to go. Maybe the idea will catch on, and I can get an early copyright and make some money.

The important thing is taking care of the models, so they are not the walking wounded. We need professional standards in the world of porn.

02-13-09  04:53am

Reply To Message

6

kkman112 (12) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

Haha, Drooler! If you ever find a vid like that, send it to me! LOL!
I don't really care either-way - it should be up to the girl and the producer. The girl should be able to decide if she wants to and the producers/directors should be able to decide if it is something that goes along with the theme of the site.

02-13-09  05:58am

Reply To Message

7

messmer (137) What badandy400 said!
02-13-09  09:43am

Reply To Message

8

turboshaft (24) I can't say I care too much, but shots to the eyes were talked about in ramscrota's recent cumshots thread.

There is a "Pink Eye" video series where the objective is to specifically target a (usually) reluctantly held open eye. The whole point there is to not have anything protecting the girls eyes.

I occasionally see girls with glasses -- which can make for a hot studious look -- but I hate it when they splatter the glasses. It looks awkward and mean for the girl, like some sort of dumb Jackass-style porn prank. Plus, it always makes me wonder if they're the girl's glasses because she would then have to go and sanitize them afterward (boiling, a strong acid, etc.).

It's dirty work, and everyone has eyelids anyways.

02-13-09  11:36am

Reply To Message

9

Drooler (220) Really, I'd rather see the girl blow the guy to orgasm, then she can decide whether it's "like or "love" -- spit or swallow. Then she can slide her tongue and/or cheekbones up and down his shaft and flick away at the little bits.

See? Isn't that a pretty good idea? Does it ALWAYS have to be blow then cumshot/facial? The way that porn is made these days, you'd think there was some LAW that REQUIRED the girl to take a flying face-full.

BTW, what I described in the first paragraph is closer to what's in "vintage" porn from the '70's and '80's.

02-13-09  12:19pm

Reply To Message

10

Wittyguy (95) OSHA needs to get involved as more government regulation always makes things better ("We're from the government, we're here to help" .... NOT!) No government involvment on condoms but flying man goo must be regulated as an unauthorized use of air space or overseen by the medical boards as a Pink Eye Protein ProtEction Regulation so all the chicks can say "Don't PEPPER my face, dude!".
02-13-09  12:25pm

Reply To Message

11

TrashMan (Disabled) sorry, but the eye should be off limits...
02-13-09  12:53pm

Reply To Message

12

RagingBuddhist (65) If they're going to wear goggles, they should have to also wear rubber gloves. They're both equally stupid looking so they should be a set.
02-13-09  01:39pm

Reply To Message

13

pat362 (371) I've never been a fan of facials, so how about we simply stop making them and this way there will be no need for weird eye protectors.
02-13-09  06:33pm

Reply To Message

14

Monahan (42) REPLY TO #13 - pat362 :

Agree with Pat362.

Cum dripping from an internal or such does something for me but facial cum shots make absolutely no sense at all to me. Especially after a guy has to jerk himself off to force an ejaculation.

A great cum shot is when a guy is about to explode inside and pulls out just in time. That tells me that he was really getting off on the fuck.

02-14-09  11:14am

Reply To Message

15

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #6 - kkman112 :

The more I think about it, the more I like this idea: As the guy is about to go off, the girl waits to hold up that little whirring fan at just the right moment. Will it hit her face or the fan?

That would be fun to watch. Since cumshots are so stupid anyway, might as well have some stupid fun with them.

02-14-09  01:16pm

Reply To Message

16

pat362 (371) REPLY TO #14 - Monahan :

I also enjoy creampies because at least it makes sense from a sex point of view. I have no problem with a blow job that results in ejacalation, but it must remain in the mouth. She doesn't have to swallow, but there can't be any pulling out and the guy shooting all over the place. That is one of the reasons why I much prefer older movies to most of todays stuff.
02-14-09  05:09pm

Reply To Message

17

C Spanker (2) Cum in the eye is was one of the hazards of the job and needs to be accepted. Eye protection should not be allowed unless it is glasses they wear throughout the scene.
02-28-09  08:15am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.