Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : dracken (246)  

Feedback:   All (648)  |   Reviews (121)  |   Comments (106)  |   Replies (421)

Other:   Replies Received (301)  |   Trust Ratings (66)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 130 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit 18 Years Old

18 Years Old
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - exclusive content of hot teenage girls. Maybe they are not all 18 but they look pretty young, don't get me wrong they are not little Lupe or lolitas but they look like young ladies ready to get satisfied.

- a lot of fun role-play. Almost each scene has a certain twist or fun little detail. In one scene the girl just graduated and is dressed in a cap and gown. In another the girl is a scout or a cheerleader. Seeing a hot teen try to cheer with cum on her face is extremely hot. However the girls never take it to seriously. They laugh at how ridiculous a scene is and everybody seems to have a good time as opposed to sites that go all the way trying to pretend the girls are something they are not.

- 175 scenes (video, photos and screencaps) wmv and mpg high quality formats as well as some other smaller formats and photos are zipped. For me again, the downloads went fine. Ten hq videos downloaded in about 30-40 minutes.

- easy to navigate + search for a model.

- network access
Cons: - as with all porn pros websites you have to accept the silliness of some stuff. Of course that girl didn't just graduate, of course she didn't loose her dog. It's all a show and you can tell it's a show. If that turns you on, this site rocks if it doesn't then it will annoy you.

- website loading times can get annoying at times. The whole network needs more servers as pages load a bit slowly.

- never got that streaming player to work.

- ads on the pages. Sometimes flashing , especially the ads for live cameras on the top

- the male character drives around in the beginning of most videos talking about all sort of stuff. Sometimes this is pointless and annoying, sometimes it's relevant and fun...it's almost a 50-50 chance that something said will piss someone off...
Bottom Line: I mentioned in another review for Cock Competition that the whole Porn Pros network has a jock / frat boy feel to it. Never is this more obvious than on this site (in my humble opinion)

I remember a discussion where the main character claims he never banged a cheerleader and the camera man laughs saying that now a dream comes true (spoiler alert: the guy has sex with a girl dressed up as a cheerleader). The whole site feels like that, fun, joking about everything, including the acting in the scenes and a bit high-school-ish. I would almost hazard to say that this is the site we would have made back in tenth grade when we couldn't get laid with the most beautiful girl around, but dreamed of having our own porn site (please tell me I wasn't the only one with that dream).

This whole approach works fine if you like to get amused by porn, however if you like it to be more serious or the girls to be completely innocent/abused/taking control of the situation...well this is not really the place for that kind of stuff. What they offer is mostly regular boy-girl scenes with nice angles, hot girls and a bit of role-playing/story.

Again, it all depends on what you want from your porn. There are other teen sites where the girls are little angels, there are other sites where the girls are little devils but here more than anywhere else I felt like the models were girls trying to act like porn stars and having a good laugh while doing it.

P.S. Some stats about videos and photos: hq videos vary between 512x218 and 740x404 and in size range from around 300mb to 500-600mb and photos come in at around 850px × 850px

08-05-09  01:07pm

Replies (0)
Review
2
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Decent amount of content around 5,606 videos (although most girl-girl and boy-girl scenes have three videos each) around 1,427 models and daily updates.
- Exclusive models
- More recent videos are available in multiple formats up to 1280x720
- All shoots have images available as ziped files, they also have a best of, which highlight the best photos in a nice gallery.
- All models look very natural, little make-up many are not shaved, just trimmed almost all look very next door girl
- The sex looks very natural, there are some awkward pauses, no insane penetration angles, the blowjobs look realistic.
- Overall the site has a fun, softcore feel with some close-ups of vaginas and blowjobs.
- A lot of the scenes have a before and after where they interview the models and the girls seem pretty relaxed (although there are some serious language barriers at times)
-In a lot of scenes the orgasms are or look real.
- Good download speeds
- Decent forum with many members
Cons: - Almost all of the videos have an old school feel to them, with highlights overblown and colors a bit faded. Even the highest resolutions feel a bit grainy.
- A lot of videos are broken up into various parts. Also the before and after interviews could have easily been lumped with the actual scene.
- Scenes tend to have a slow intro (I remember one video where the boy texts the guy for 3 minutes)
- The site's navigation is decent but takes some getting used to. There are videos labeled "intimate moments" which are basically solo masturbation shots, but there are also "solo shots" and "after dark" shots and when I say shot I don't mean a video I mean a collection of videos... trust me it makes sense but it takes some getting used to
- The girls are very natural looking and some could use a bit more make-up. I was expecting the same kind of models Backroomcastingcouch or Exploitedcollegegirls has, but the girls here seemed less attractive (IMO)
Bottom Line: Man, this site is something else. I've been a member of most major porn sites over the years and have seen many styles and combinations of content, but Abbywinters stands out as a unique product. If I had to compare it to anything else I'd say it's close to suicide girls in their focus on fun, softcore stuff and community (at least that's how suicide girls used to be back when I joined it a few year ago)

The great selling point of the site are the exclusive, natural looking models and the realistic settings and action. The site claims that all scenes are shot in the girls homes with their outfits and only (supposedly) with their boyfriends and/or girlfriends. To cement this claim there are before and after sex interviews where the girls explain what felt good and what they were nervous/ excited about, where they met the boyfriend, how often they have sex in private and so on.

Aside from scenes with boy-girl, girl-girl sex the site has "Intimate moments" scenes where supposedly the girls are alone with the camera and can be themselves as well as solo shots where the director interviews them a bit before the action. They also have a handful of "after dark" scenes where the girls are supposed to be dressed in nicer clothes and be more romantic. I hope they get more of these as some of the outfits were very nice, but for right now they only have a dozen or so.

Overall the site has a decent premise, unique content and a strong community of followers (and a great forum btw). If you like their style and the girls this place will be a great find and the 3 month membership a steal. However the scenes are far from perfect and you could easily end up disliking the site for how different it feels.

The navigation is efficient, but somewhat different from other porn sites and can get a bit confusing at first. The homepage shows the updates, but the preview images are not animated. The easiest way to browse is by looking at shoots and then either video shoots or image shoots (this way you get animated previews), but you can't easily view all models that video or only images and there is no way to search for top rated models or Russian models. Not to mention that older videos tend to be split into 10 parts and even more recent ones often have 2 parts.

Speaking of videos, I have to say that the girls look great in photos but in many of the videos they end up looking average, even a bit disappointing. I suspect that in order to maintain the vibe of the site everything is filmed with minimal equipment and it shows. Overexposed shots, some blurry close-ups, the sound of the camera taking photos in the background. It all contributes to make the site feel unprofessional. Don't even ask me how many scenes are shot in an extremely bright room with perfectly clean white walls or how overexposed reds look in half the scenes. Overall for me the technical quality was a huge disappointment.

The content itself is decent with a lot of the girls really into it and believable orgasms

However it's a bit slow paced for my taste. All sex scenes take several minutes before anyone gets naked. I personally don't see the need for a little make believe story (oh I'm a photographer, get naked. Oh we're watching tv, get naked) when there is a before interview where the girls say they are excited to have sex (especially when some scenes are only 25 minutes long).

Speaking of the interviews. Some have captions to translate the interview and those are great, the British accents on some girls are even better, but the broken English most girls have coupled with giggling every two seconds when they don't understand the question can get frustrating and took me out of the mood.

At the end of the day I see the appeal of Abby Winters, but I don't think I saved more than a handful of videos. The image sets are very good, but the technical quality and the poor set-up make this feel like old, old Pierre Woodman casting videos. I don't regret joining the site but it's not my cup of tea, I'll stick with Nubiles, which has a similar feel but much better navigation and quality videos.

05-01-12  07:24pm

Replies (4)
Review
3
Visit About Girls Love

About Girls Love
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 60 scenes of lesbian love, available for download as clips (around 20-30 clips) or full videos of three different sizes (WMV each)

- each scene has about 200-300 images at 1280px × 853px. Zipped archives available.

- there is a surprising amount of variation between scenes. the older ones seem a bit more passionate with more kissing and what not, but the recent ones have three girls drilling each other with toys. I am not a fan of lesbian sex, but even I downloaded a few videos.

- a lot of very cute models doing hardcore.

- a lot of sexy outfits including some sort of ghost rags, skirts and stockings...

- I really enjoyed how much the girls smile and laugh in each video, makes it feel like they are truly enjoying themselves. I only wish they had some anal dildo play...

- frequent updates
Cons: - this is one site where I really, really think English could have improved the whole experience. The girls seem to coax each other into doing the scene and having them whisper to each other in English could add a lot to the atmosphere.

- a search function would have been nice.

- a model page with info about the girls and maybe links to other videos in the network would have helped.

- there are quite a few unbelievable scenes, like the one where a girl sucks on another girl's strap-on and they both seem to orgasm...hmm I know they are acting but somehow the whole feel of the site is a amateur/real videos. Scenes like that kill the mood.

- I really, really wish they would use mp4 instead of wmv as the last one makes videos much larger without necessarily offering a boost in quality.

- more focus on models would be nice.
Bottom Line: This is one of the best lesbian sites I have seen recently, which doesn't really say much as I don't usually join lesbian sites. However, the girls are hot and they look into it. I am convinced at least half the girls on here are actual lesbians or bi-sexuals and you can really tell. Also I enjoyed all the variation and the slightly different attitudes of models, from forward and very sexual to very shy.

My only complaint as with all sites of this network is that they don't showcase their models enough. Just giving us a page with links to all their videos and a few more words past the usual "She was horny and wanted to finger her friend, watch them cum." I really think this site and the whole network could become awesome, if they only paid more attention to the awesome girls they have.

Also I wish they would integrate the site within the network. A search through all their sites for certain categories would be nice. I know many Russian teen sites don't do that, but why not raise the bar a little?

I mean the great content is already there, the showcasing needs a bit more work, why not do it and have a wonderful site?

10-05-09  07:01pm

Replies (0)
Review
4
Visit Access Matures

Access Matures
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Decent amount of images (around 100+ galleries per site each one with about 60-80 images downloadable as zip files, most images at 1024x768)

- Not all image galleries have videos, in fact most sites in the network only have around 30 videos split into clips, no streaming and no sense as to how the videos are named or what format they come in (anything from wmv to avi and one or two mpg's, but on the bright side most of the videos are at 720 x 576 or around there. So you have crystal clear images of girls pretending to have sex...


- Very good download speeds (on a network that couldn't even stream hulu I got my downloads in a few minutes) I am trully impressed

- A few cute models you have to hunt for through the whole network

- Some nice pantyhose scenes, girl eaten out through pantyhose, but nothing I haven't seen on other sites.

- The price is right.
Cons: - Bad/ no updates. I agree with the previous review that their updates are old content re-posted. I joined on June 17th and the latest update is from June 18th...hmm something fishy is going on here.

-Poor organization/ navigation of the site. I found images of white men in the Black and Matures section of the site. Many sites overlap with their content (saw no difference between coed matures and office matures) No way to search for models or a certain category (lesbian, hardcore, etc)

- For most of the scenes there is no penetration and there is a lot of old men giving head to young chicks. The lesbian content is a bit more hardcore, with some actual dildo penetrations. But if you expect more than three images of a cum-shot, or maybe some anal...keep dreaming.

- Overall very disappointing models, compared to the 21sextury's grandpas fuck teens the models here are just disappointing. They look very average and even the MILFs...well I wouldn't put the F there...
Bottom Line: I joined this site because I enjoy seeing teen girls getting fucked by old men. I was part of 21sextury and they left me wanting more. The joining page here promised more teen girls and less MILFS's which is not really my cup of tee anyway so I said, sure sign me up.

However, once I joined I discovered that the whole network could be reduced to three categories: old-men giving head to girls and some lesbian content and young boy on old woman action. Overall a tad bit disappointing for a network that promises "ultimate mature porn."

Then I realized that the videos are broken into clips...I hate putting clips together. As if that wasn't enough once I have my videos I get to see some seriously unrealistic sex scenes (or some men that have enormous penises and can bend them in unbelievable ways) Basically 70% of the content is barely a notch above what you could see on Softcore, late night TV porn.

The rest 30% of the content is either lesbian or young men on old women (they actually have some images of penetration there)

To add injury to the whole thing I can't even search for the one or two cute models that I found. (There is a very cute read-head in the mature co-ed and then in the lick matures section and I feel like she has to be somewhere else...If only the preview thumbnails were more descriptive, or if they had a search function)

So yeah, overall I'm very disappointed with the network and will look to get my money back. But, they do have good speeds, a decent price and if you really like MILF's with young boys it might be worth the one month fee.

I'd look at All over 30 or old and young gangbang or 21sextury...anyway, hope this helped.

My advice? Stick with

06-17-10  06:58pm

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit Altered Ass Holes

Altered Ass Holes
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - still only 16 videos and none of them have the full video download option. Get ready to take down 7-16 1 minute clips and them merge them all together. The video quality is around 640x480 and going down in the older scenes.

- there are screencaps for almost every scene as well as high-res photos at 533px × 800px and 720px × 480px. The lack of a zipped archive made this very frustrating. the best way to get the images being via firefox Downloadthemall and selecting download links on page.

- a few very cute models such as Hillary Scott before she got all that work done on her (she actually looks adorable) hailey page and a few more.

- pretty rough anal videos.

- access to the whole meat members network and this site is very well integrated allowing for searches within the network from the site's main page.
Cons: - site hasn't been updated since 06/07/2006. I don't suspect anymore updates will be added.

- video quality is okay but could be much better.

- server speed could be improved AKA slow downloads for me and the streaming, when it worked, was slow as hell.

- no search option within the site itself. Not that many user friendly features.
Bottom Line: This site is worth it if you're really crazy about the models and want to see how they looked back in 2005. Otherwise there isn't enough here to keep you busy for more than an hour.

The action is good, the photos very nice and the models hot, but the fact that you have to take down clips and then merge them. The lack of zipped archives and the slowness of the servers, just makes you want to yell at the screen. Which is the opposite of what porn is supposed to do :)

I enjoyed the site as part of the whole network but I would recommend against it on it's own. There simply isn't enough here to entertain one. Taken as a whole the network might be interesting and I have a review on it as well, much higher score than this site...

The only reason this site get's more than the minimum is the good quality images and the models, which were very cute.

It's a shame since a little more work could have taken this site into the top ten of it's category easily.

10-30-09  03:33pm

Replies (0)
Review
6
Visit Amateur Violations

Amateur Violations
(0)

60.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Around 48 scenes and they seem to update every 10 days or so.
- Videos are available in multiple formats including HD (1250x700) and smaller formats (640x320 and I believe even 320x). They have streaming, a trailer for the scene as well as HD images (3,000px × 2,000px and zip files available) and screencaps.
- The whole network has some cute, exclusive models and this site in particular has a few hot girls (check out Eve Evans and Lexi bloom)
- The theme of this site (as far as I can tell) is weird amateur-looking stuff that didn't really fit anywhere else. As such you have a scene where a girl is on the phone while getting fucked, a gloryhole scene, a girl with a bag over her head and a scene where the actors get "caught" by an angry parent. Overall I'd rate this site funny, rather than hot. Good for a chuckle and some scenes have a few good POV BJ moments, but overall a bit of a mixed bag.
Cons: -As mentioned above the site really feels like an odds and ends closet, this doesn't fit anywhere else so let's put it here. This could explain why there are several scenes that seem to have been split up to make it appear as if they have more content updates. Overall there are actually only around 20 or so scenes here.
- They have ads both to live cams and other sites. Install adblock and you should be good to go, otherwise it can be a bit of a pain.
- Several of the scenes are much shorter than described (5 minutes as opposed to 36) I assume if you grabbed both videos for one scene and merged them you'd get the full time length. Anyhow, it feels cheap of them to pad the site like this
Bottom Line: Don't get me wrong, I love the Pornpros network. Their stuff is consistently both funny and sexy. They somehow manage to get some good looking exclusive girls and they have some great scenes with little funny interviews and stories. However I don't understand why this particular site exists. It feels like a complete hodgepodge of random scenes that don't fit together and for the most part aren't even particularly hot or interesting.

I guess the idea was to have a bunch of amateur scenes with random funny stories behind them. One girl takes revenge on her boyfriend and calls him while getting fucked by another dude. Another girl doesn't realize when the condom breaks and is mad after the dude cums inside her. Two lovers get caught in the act by an angry parent, a gloryhole and a girl who gets a bag over her head.

In theory all these sound kinda funny, maybe interesting, but I fail to see why we need an entire site of such scripted "funny" porn stories. To make things worse many of these stories are broken up into two updates for no apparent reason other than to make it look like they have a lot more updates than they do.

The Pornpros network always had a frat house vibe of "Bro, let me tell you this crazy story while we drink cheap beer and pop our collars." For the most part this doesn't bother me, in fact I enjoy it once in a while (as corny as it is this vibe is much better in my opinion than abusing girls on film and calling that porn) However this site along with the public violations one always felt out of place on a porn site; they are almost more at home on a jackass reality show than on a porn site, in my opinion.

I mean I enjoy a funny story behind my porn, but what is the point of doing an entire scene where the girl has a bag on her face? Or why have a scene that ends up with 3 minutes of the girl spiting the cum in anger and saying it tastes fucking weird? These are funny stories that you'd share with friends not porn you jack off too.

To add to the disappointment most of the scenes look like they were filmed in a very dark room with a cell-phone. The camera work is not nearly as good as most of the network and while I understand that they wanted to go for an "amateur" feel, in the end, when I can barely see a girl's vagina, I just feel cheated. Not to mention that now I suspect several of these scenes are old stuff they ripped from somewhere else and are just recycling. (I hope I am wrong but I am suspicious of some of these older looking grainy films)

Anyhow, once you get past the mixed content there are some nice scenes here. Some of the girls are cute (again, if you join check out Eve Evans)and they do have sex or at least give BJ's. My recommendation is to see if you like a girl and then check out her scenes on the rest of the network since they are always better.

That being said I have to say that in the end this is a very subjective review. Maybe some people really like this kind of funny story porn, I for one just felt confused and disappointed at the poor video quality.

Now please don't judge this whole network based on this review. They have some great content, just check out 18 year olds or disgraced 18 or any of the other great sites they have. This is just a small weird site that I don't think is really reflective of the network as a hole.

10-23-11  07:55pm

Replies (1)
Review
7
Visit American Bukkake

American Bukkake
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A lot of scenes (way over 200), starting all the way back in 2004 and up to January 2011.
- Videos (640x320, 340x240 for the older stuff, which unfortunately means most of the content here) and images (720x480) although no zipped archives here.
- A lot of pretty good looking models and a ton of guys who cum on them. We're talking about dozens of dudes in most scenes. Basically, I don't think I've seen any other site which shows this much cum on a girl (excluding fake semen). The Gokkun scenes, where the girl actually swallows a lot of the semen are even more intense.
- A lot of behind the scenes videos were you get to see the girls get ready, some candid interviews and a few mistakes.
- Access to the entire network which includes a lot more oral fixated videos.
- If you have not gotten any of these videos before, and like bukkake and oral sex this network is a decent value
- relatively easy navigation, didn't have any issues with log-in or downloading or streaming stuff
Cons: - This site doesn't seem to be still updating (although others in the network do update)
- Too much of the site's content is focused on behind the scenes videos. I love those scenes, but with a lot of the videos at around 340 resolution and the more recent ones almost entirely BTS, it feels like we're missing out (In fact I believe they have some behind the scenes for videos we don't even see on the site.)
- The site needs a serious face-lift. The navigation right now works, but it's lacking. No search functions, no easy way to sort through the different types of scenes. No model pages. Compared to many other sites this feel like it's missing some basic features.
- More download options and more/ higher resolutions would be great.
- Overall content can get a bit repetitive.
Bottom Line: I joined this network because I had never seen any of the videos from JM Productions before and as far as I can tell none of those scenes are available anywhere else on the internet in one place. Not even Videobox has all the DVDs from the American Bukakke or Gag factor series. So basically if you enjoy seeing good looking girls getting covered in cum you can't miss these videos and VOD would be way more expensive than a months membership on this site.

On the other hand the sites in the network feel a bit like they are the bare minimum necessary to get 30 bucks out of you. The design is very basic and a lot of the older stuff they offer is in poor, poor resolution (for this site which hasn't been updating recently that means a lot of the content is not very qualitative).

The other reviews here already pointed out that many scenes that are on DVDs are not available on the site, there is no HD and there is way more Behind the scenes stuff than necessary (Gagfactor has a much better mix of BTS and actual content.) To this list of complaints I'd like to add that for a bukakke site there isn't that much actual bukakke here. Several of the videos are actually lesbian bukakke or reverse bukakke, both of which are squirting in my book and don't belong on a site that writes half it's title in a semen-like font.

Also while I understand that this site is strictly focused on bukkake, I wish they had more fore-play. Not necessarily sex, (although a few of the scenes where they have a good old gang bang before the cum are nice) but more stripping, more of the girl getting naked. Right now most of the scenes feel like they start in the middle with the girl already masturbating and go on from there.

Another annoyance was the lack of a better preview page. Right now once inside the members area you get on huge list with the female models name, the date the scene was updated, a small thumbnail that is often not very descriptive and the length of the clip. It's not enough to really sell the scene. I'd love a models page or a category search so I can find all the lesbian bukkake scenes quickly.

Now that I got the negative points out of the way I'd like to focus a bit on the scenes, which for the most part are great. They have a few with actual sex (if you join check out Chastity Lynn's anal bukakke, it's great) and a lot of scenes with many, many men cumming on one girl that usually plays with herself a bit before the actual cum-fest. If you enjoy facials, ruined make-up, a lot of cum and some swallowing you really can't miss these videos. All the models seem to have a good time and they joke around a bit a the end of the video.

We also get a bunch of more or less interesting twists (birthday cake with cum on it? bukakke in a gym? Martini glass or dog bowl filled with cum? They have it) There are also a bunch of different outfits, corsets and even some light BDSM.

Another highlight are the Behind the scenes which for the most part are petty good (I preferred the ones on GagFactor). If you enjoy seeing girls get ready for the scenes, joke around with the camera guy, change from regular street clothes to sexy outfits then this site will be a nice surprise. I personally really enjoyed a few scenes where you get to see the girl without make-up, acting very casually, but you have to be interested in BTS to really see a great value here.

So overall, this site doesn't rank as high as Gag Factor (see my review for that site as well before joining the network) but still offers some nice scenes for anyone who loves cum-shots. The lack of recent updates, low resolution and the niche appeal hurt the score and while there is a lot of fun in the scenes here I don't think they have as much personality as other sites in the network.

Basically I'm recommending this to fans, for anyone else check out the other sites in the network or consider another place to get your facial videos :)

10-02-11  07:32pm

Replies (5)
Review
8
Visit Anal Acrobats

Anal Acrobats
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -hardcore action
-hot/cute actresses or at least interesting outfits
-mostly lesbian action with golf balls, dildos and some other weird objects (I like lesbians so this is a plus for me)
-relatively easy navigation
-access to whole network
-nice streaming options
Cons: -the scenes and girls get a bit repetitive. you know that a golf ball is going to go into her ass
-the gape can get a bit too intense, to the point where I felt sorry for a girl or two
-the download speed is very, very slow
-the network offers also similar looking girls/scenes so the bonus sites are kinda disappointing (or a bonus if you just wanted hardcore anal action)
Bottom Line: Overall if you like anal action this is a good place to see some exclusive content. Many cute girls (including two dressed like rabbits, hopping around before they fuck and one dressed like a bee) but a somewhat boring theme after you've seen inside the colon of 5-10 girls.

08-01-09  03:31pm

Replies (0)
Review
9
Visit Anal Hell

Anal Hell
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 114 videos in HD (1200 x 720), standard WMV (380 x 200) and quicktime format. Available for download (went around 400kb to 2 mb when I had two videos going) as well as streaming (which was pretty fast). However many videos are truncated into 2 parts.

- About 180 photo galleries (683px × 1029px) with somewhere around 200 photos per set. No zipped archives that I could find, but some very hot photos that were not available as videos (as far as I could tell).

- Many hot, but well known models. Both male and female (Hillary Scott, Lucy Lee, James Dean, etc.)

- The scenes are pretty intense with some serious gape and a lot of anal action. Most of the scenes have some sort of story (boyfriend brings a flower over, sex ensues pretty quick)

- Access to a whole network of HD videos. Including Teenage Whores, Just Legal Babes, Geek Girls sex and a bunch of other HD stuff (65 sites in total including some nice solo sites). Also you get some discounts for other sites.
Cons: - I liked this sites design but it lacks some basic features such as a search by category for example. The site has anal with toys, group sex and deep throating but you have to dig for it. They don't even offer a model search. Also I would like a little bit more integration within the network, the site shows recent updates from all sites but no network wide search.

- Couldn't find updates schedule, although the updates do happen (almost weekly). Why not brag about it?

- Personally I found most of the stuff on the site not really that arousing. I have seen most of the models have anal before (the scenes were new, but the models are mostly well known women) If you want to see fresh faces or real young adults this isn't really the place. Also the scenes are very brief (around 12 minutes each) with no time devoted to developing the story or characters involved (aka no interviews or more than a smudge of storyline)

- Each video saves as vid_01.wmv so you have to go back and rename stuff
Bottom Line: Overall this site delivers what it promises: high quality videos and anal. But there is room for much improvement, a more user friendly interface, more variety in the scenes (not necessarily as in having the girls do the crazy stuff from Anal Acrobats but as in having more plot, maybe an interview, maybe more outfits. Stuff that would bring the site out from under the "Generic" tag where it is right now.)

As it stands, right now, I wouldn't necessarily spend more than a month's worth of membership here. Evil Films has much more intense action and places like First Anal Quest have a lot more variation in models and outfits.

However, this doesn't mean that the site is bad, along with its network it's a decent deal, especially if you're not that into anal as to want only a site dedicated to that niche. There are lesbian anal scenes, solo scenes here as well a many classic sex scenes. Furthermore if you want crystal clear image this is one of the best HD sites out there.

But don't expect the kind of exclusive models and close connection to the actors that other, smaller websites offer. This is a big network and it feel like one. It's almost like the Playboy or Hustler network in that regard, with a feeling of old school, classic porn to it. If that makes any sense.

Either way. I hope my review was at least somewhat useful and please feel free to ask any questions you may have.

P.s. Each scene is about 12 minutes long so what they gain in high quality they loose in length or video. This also means that if a scene is longer you will have 2 or 3 pieces...a tad bit frustrating but it probably made sense for the webmasters at some point...

09-18-09  03:13pm

Replies (0)
Review
10
Visit Anal Recruiters

Anal Recruiters
(1)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 30 videos with multiple download options ranging from (320x240 to an impressive 1920x1080)

- very good download speeds will actually allow you to get that 1920 and 1.something GB monster video on your harddisk in about half an hour or so. It was also nice to see that the pages still loaded fine despite me downloading a lot of stuff.

- only site where you can see a deaf girl have anal sex...the variation in girls and their reactions is impressive. This is one big bonus of this network, a lot of different stuff goes on from huge rubber dicks in a NYU student to slightly abusive treatment of petite girls. But it's all hardcore and it's all pretty intense.

- 35 photo sets with zipped archives and around 200 or more photos each ( photos are at 1440px × 960px)
Cons: - no network integration AKA no whole network search for scenes where a model appears. No model pages, no category search (although this site is called anal recruiters so if you can't guess what kind of content it has...)

- some picture sets downloaded much slower than the videos, no clue why.

- better previews of the videos would have been nice. I remember for a girl called Amber Rayne the preview is a close-up of her ass and a guy riding it...a photo of her face/ outfit would have been nice...
Bottom Line: The discount at PU combined with the size of the network makes this a very good purchase for all fans of hardcore sex and I mean hardcore. Some of the girls really look like they are in serious discomfort. For me this didn't really work but seeing young and often very cute girls get abused is a turn-on for many and this is the network for them. No teddy bears and slow stripping videos here.

What I found particularly interesting was seeing the same girl in different scenes around the network...I just wish they had a model page for each girl that appears more than once or a network wide search. Also It would be nice to see a clear update schedule. I mean in the member section you can see that updates are taking place but you don't know what's up next. Nonetheless, the network is growing and they constantly add more exclusive content so that's awesome...

All and all this is a nice network deal, but Anal Recruiters isn't really the best site on here. Facial Abuse has a lot more content and I'd even hazard to say that it has more anal scenes than this place. However it's a nice bonus and for 20 bucks this place is definitely worth your time. As long as you like hardcore sex.

P.S. the HD videos are awesome...

10-08-09  03:26pm

Replies (0)
Review
11
Visit Ass Bangers Ball

Ass Bangers Ball
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 85 scenes each one available as 640x480 WMV or Ipod format, as well as a few images (around 20-30 images per set, not that many but enough to get an idea of the action)
- Zipped archives available and images are up to 3072x2048 although the lighting is not always the best in the photos.
- Most scenes have two girls that get pounded by several guys. There is a ton of anal, deepthroat and DP. Also there are some serious cumshots with multiple guys covering one girl in semen. Pretty intense stuff.
- Access to the rest of the network which has several good sites with multiple updates. A lot of fetish/ extreme action here including BSDM, latex, and fuck machines.
- Some very cute models and fun costumes (there are a few masks, a Indians vs cowboys theme) lost of stockings and high heels.
Cons:

- Last update published 2010/12/02
- Several scenes have strange cuts during the scene. I understand that this is necessary when you are shooting an orgy with multiple people, but it still feels strange when the action suddenly changes.
- Some models are really disappointing (older looking, strange body types) More make-up or better light might have helped the scenes. It's also strange to see a very cute girl paired with a woman that is not the same body type/ look.
- Navigation is okay, but feels a bit outdated, would like more categories/ search functions. Right now the main search tool is a type in yourself deal, which can be a bit hard if you're new to the site.
- Sometimes the focus of the scene is not necessarily on the most interesting action. For example a girl is getting DP'ed but the camera is focused on her giving a BJ.
Bottom Line: For the price this network is very decent, as long as you like pretty extreme content, and enjoy BSDM. They have several sites dedicated to rough sex and orgies with this one being a very interesting one. Almost all scenes feature two girls and several guys (there are one or two video with only one girl and 4 or 5 guys, but for the most part expect dozens of dudes.) The focus is on anal sex and DP, although several times I believe only one of the girls does anal.
I say I believe because the action can get pretty confusing, which is understandable when you have 12 guys and 2 women having sex. However, the scene editing doesn't help the situation. In one scene we cut away from a sex scene to a shot of the other girl crying out in what seems genuine pain, we cut back to the sex and then back to the distressed girl after she presumably got some more anal lube. That is 4 cuts within maybe 2 minutes, completely unnecessarily in my opinion. Unfortunately this happens a lot in the more recent scenes. They cut from one girl to the other almost every few minutes and seem to have a lot of close-ups of either one of the girls face or her genital area then cut and switch around.
I understand the difficulties of filming an orgy and I have to say that all things considered they do a pretty good job, but less editing would have been preferred. It's not like the scenes are incredibly long, most of them come in around 32 minutes which I believe is on the short end considering how much material they could get from two girls having sex with multiple guys.
Aside from the way the videos are edited the site doesn't seem to update anymore, so that's a big downside, but considering they have almost 100 intense scenes I am okay with the amount of content (just don't plan to spend a whole year on this site)
The final issue I had with the site was that the model quality is hugely varied. They have some incredible looking girls that I couldn't believe were ready to do this kind of action, but on the other hand they have some ladies that would be more at home on a big and beautiful site or on a mature page. Combining the two types of models in one scene can make for some awkward moments, especially since they like to cut from one girl to the other pretty fast.
Speaking of the two girls, I was a bit surprise to see that in several scenes the two females don't really interact that much. The focus is mostly on the two girls getting pounded by the males, almost separately from each other. At times you could easily forget that there were two women involved in most videos.
Aside from the points above the site was a very nice experience. Downloads worked fine ans streaming was excellent. I wish they had more images available for each scene, but the few they do have are all pretty hardcore action so no major complaints there.
The navigation and design of the site felt a bit outdated, but still very functional and while they could use a more improved model page or a category search I had no issues previewing and finding content.
The bottom-line: A good site for anyone who likes orgies and hardcore sex. Worth checking out for a month or two, especially if the rest of the network looks appealing to you.

11-14-11  03:42pm

Replies (0)
Review
12
Visit Ass Teen Mouth

Ass Teen Mouth
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 08-14-09  06:03am  (Update History)
Reason: Expanded on previous review.
Pros: - All the teen core club sites have good quality videos of hot teenagers doing hardcore, ATM is no exception. 54 sets of both video (Wmv at 640 x 480) and anywhere from 200 to 500 photos per session at either 853px × 1280px or 1280px × 853px. Sadly no zip files for the photos, but, on the good side, they are not screen caps...

- Simple browsing. There are 27 pages and each page has two girls on it. It's a nice format and the site design works but it's maybe too simple at times a good search function would have helped a lot.

- As the whole Teen Core Club network this site has some of the hottest European teens out there, and they all do hardcore scenes (deep throat and anal are a must for each model on this site).

- The newer videos with girls make-up running as they gag are incredibly hot.

- Camerawork and lighting are good, the videos look great and the photos are of a superior quality. Overall much better than other teen sites I've seen.
Cons: - In my experience this was one of the worst sites from the Teen Core Club network when it came to loading times and downloading videos. This site over a period of 2 months+ failed to load at least 5-7 times. Even when I wanted to access it today in order to write this review it failed to load. Not to mention that navigating it while downloading three or four videos is impossible. More servers please!

- The content is a bit lacking with only 50-ish scenes may of the girls available here also doing hardcore on other sites of the network. Some of the older videos are disappointing, looking exactly like the videos on Try Teens or Girls Got Cream.

- The lack of a better (or any) search feature is a big problem of the Teen Core Club network and I won't re-hash all the issues it causes. Also the fact that all videos are downloaded with the same name can cause some confusion and unwanted over-writing of files.
Bottom Line: Overall the site is nice and it was pleasant to see some of my favorite teens from this network really get into hardcore gagging and anal sex. Most of the older videos can be a bit repetitive as the content is not as extreme as advertised, but the more recent videos are really hot. I don't know who decided to put eye-liner on the girls before they choke on some dude's penis but it was a stroke of genius, making the scenes look great and very hot.

However the same problems as the other network sites plague ATM as well. Lack of model search or a top rated search or any bio for the models as well as sometimes slow download and navigation speeds. If you read anyone of my Teen Core Club reviews you probably heard the whole litany of "They have great models why don't they do more to showcase them." Well, ATM is no exception and just a bit more work from the webmasters would go a long way into making this a better website.

As it stands now, ATM has some good content and many hot girls. It's worth it as part of a network and even more so if you like hardcore teens that look extremely hot while doing crazy stuff. But on it's own, well it still has some growing to do before it can stand on it's own.

08-02-09  05:09am

Replies (1)
Review
13
Visit Asshole Fever

Asshole Fever
(1)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -When you join the site you get instant access to the 21sextury network of 30 or so websites and eventually you have the entire network.

-Very nice bonus program (after a few months you end up paying 10 bucks and you get a ton of websites that range a lot of niches)

-Each of the 351 scenes has zip images as well as video (most have mp4 and wmv as well as HD and normal version)

- The navigation is decent, no need to log out and back in, you can select different thumbnail views and the models pages are nice to navigate. Overall no problems navigating the entire network from one place.

- Some very hot models (Aspen is gorgeous in her recent scene, but there are several keepers here)

- The site delivers what it promises, each scene has prolonged anal sex usually with some gaping shots, some DP thrown in for good measure.

- The images are shot independently of the video, which means that you get a few more nice angles instead of screen caps of what you already saw.
Cons: - The site still has some bugs, do not try to navigate the site while downloading stuff and keep in mind that after each session your download list will become useless and you need to log in again.

- Download speeds can vary a lot sometimes slowing to a crawl.

- Some info on video sizes would have been nice

- All the girls have a very mainstream porn look, as opposed to the teen sites in the network here every girl has a ton of make-up and each scene goes pretty much the same way (girl plays with herself a bit, blows two guys and gets pounded) No backstage videos, no interviews and the few videos where the girls talk are in broken English with a pretty thick accent.
Bottom Line: The site improved a lot since I last visited it and the interesting loyalty program makes this a nice place to visit for the long term. The biggest issue I had was that the focus is on creating a very mainstream porn feeling. The teen sites like Lezcuties and analteen angels are much more unique and I feel like the models are highlighted much better, but on here almost each scene feels like a hustler video. If you have gorgeous european models who are willing to do anal, why waste it on cookie cutter stuff?

Luckily lezcuties and some other sites in the newtwork make up for this, but even adding a few backstage scenes to make you feel more connected to the model could improve the feel of the site IMO.

Other than the overall feeling of the site I didn't have any major issues. While I was concerned about technical problems I have to say that so far I have seen nothing worse than the bugs competing websites have. The downloads worked fine as did the streaming (which was slow as hell though, much rather download the videos and enjoy them without lag)

The navigation works and although more search options would have been nice there are several options that made me happy (the ability to change how you see the thumbnails made me a happy man)

So if you like hot European girls and want more hardcore action that Nubiles can offer than this could be a good place to check out. I'd say it probably ranks above Teen sex mania's Gag and gape in my book, just because most scenes look more energetic and it ranks as high as teen core club because of the cute models. If they could get more girls like Aspen, Amabella and Cherie we'd have an awesome network.

In case that last paragraph where I mention names sounded confusing I recommend browsing the free tour since it allows you to view all the models and decide for your self is this is a site that you'd like or not.

01-03-11  08:46pm

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit AT Movs

AT Movs
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - around 122 scenes and frequent updates every 4 days. The scenes can be downloaded as video clips (just a piece of the larger scene), (320x240) Flash format or WMV ranging from (320 x240) to (1280x 720) (the last one is amazing, great quality)

- very hot, amateur looking girls. If you're really into Russian teens then you'll probably recognize a few girls, but not that many. There is a lot variation although most scenes have the same guy (Andrei) and involve intercourse. More outfits as well as some lesbian scenes would have been nice...

- bonus access to the network

- ability to rate videos and save them in yoru favorites folder.

- easy browsing and nice preview options (you see a bunch of screen caps not just one or two)

- the scenes have a certain home made feel to them.

- can see upcoming updates
Cons: - the video descriptions are very generic. In this scene Anna will get fucked hard...
I'd like to actually read a bit about the model, maybe a few stats such as age, preferred position, etc... especially since some models appear more than once.

- a search function per categories would be nice. There are some anal and DP scenes but you have to really dig for them.

- better download speeds would be nice, but hey maybe it was just my connection

- the ads for other sites can be a bit frustrating but nothing flashing or following your screen.

- an interview or some more foreplay would be nice. I enjoy seeing girls strip and play with themselves and the site could use longer intros like that. Also subtitles for the scenes where the actors talk in Russian?
Bottom Line: All and all this site is very good. The girls are hot and they all have that certain barely legal look about them. The new HD video is awesome and offers some very nice scenes. It is also nice to see some anal scenes...

However things could still be improved a bit regarding the site itself. You have great content make it shine through a more user friendly site. Allow people to search for certain categories of sex (anal,DP, lesbian, etc...) Maybe offer a model page like TeenDreams or Nublies has. Some bio about the model, maybe a few stats and videos she can be seen in.

Also a bit more original descriptions could help. Tell us a story instead of stating the obvious. The site is good, go that extra step to make it really stand out and remain with the users, make it more personable, more unique...

Interviews or at least subtitles in videos could go a long way in that regards. It would help people connect to the models, which will assure that users stay users for a long period of time.

However, these are all details that could be easily fixed. The core part of the site is there the good looking girls and the hot scenes.

So is this worth it? If you like teens and videos that are clearly foreign and feel amateur-ish yes. If you want perfect lighting and advanced camerawork as well as large, fake boobs and oiled up bodies...neah look somewhere else.

09-22-09  05:03pm

Replies (0)
Review
15
Visit Back Room Casting Couch

Back Room Casting Couch
(1)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - about 130 videos and a new one every Tuesday evening. Unfortunately the videos are all different sizes, quality and can either be mpg or wmv, some of them only one or the other.

- some seriously hot girls. Look through the tour to see some very cute girls, and if you look on the porn tubes you can usually find one or two previews to his videos (only the highlights, for the good stuff you have to join)

- the scenes seem very unscripted, it's just a dude with a camera and a girl. Which means that sometime he runs around setting stuff up or he chats with the girl while she lubes herself, if you like that kind of real, pierre woodman-like stuff that you'll love this site. If you prefer perfect light, professional zoom-ins and generally more mainstream stuff, this might put you off. On the other hand seeing a girl hold a camera and then seeing how it shakes as she cums (and either they are incredible actors or they really cum) makes this site very unique.
Cons: - Download speeds can be slow at times. I got anywhere from 50kb to 900, no clue why or how.

- Whole site is very amateur-ish, just like the content. There is one video were he even says he accidentally forgot to turn on one camera so we just get one angle. I thought it was funny, but other people might feel cheated out.

-Some girls only do solo (only one or two, but still a tag system would have been nice) Unfortunately the site has no search and the descriptions are not always very clear. I remember for one girl he says he can't believe she does anal, well she doesn't :)

-Some girls are not first time on video. Nicole Ray and Chastity are both professional models and I bet a few more of the girls are too, kinda shame really since the amateurs are so much cutter. There is one read head soccer mom who tries anal and her scene is incredibility hot.

- No photos, really a shame.

- No bonus sites. I understand a year or two back the site came in a package, no more
Bottom Line: This site has two very big bonuses going for it. Hot amateur girls. Many of the models are truly shy and a bit uncomfortable and it shows, also the guy is not a huge douche like other porn models. I think I mentioned this before but he closely resembles Pierre Woodman, he is there to convince these girls to have sex on camera, but he won't abuse them more than they want to be abused and that makes the whole video a lot more enjoyable. Going back to that hot read-head soccer mom I mentioned before, she tries anal and is clearly uncomfortable and he immediately stops the scene instead of pushing it. The whole moment along with the look on her face lets you know this is real, unscripted sex, but with much better camera work than a truly amateur scene.

Oh and there is also the twitter, which the guy uses to posts future interviews and ask for feedback, very nice usage of the web 2.0 media.

Unfortunately, here is where the good things stop and I have to mention the very plain site design, the lack of bonus features, the lack of a decent search button and the fact that we don't get photo-sets. For the same price I pay here I can get a Nubiles or Little Mutt subscription and get three times the content. It's true those sites don't have the interviews and the whole "real" setting, but then again you can join woodmanX and get similar content and a lot more of it (then again woodman is more expensive and not all scenes are in English).

So, the bottom line? I love the site, but I can see how many people wouldn't feel the same way. It lacks in features and if you don't LOVE the pov, interview, reality kinda videos these will leave you feeling a bit cheated. I for one will download a bunch of the videos and probably join back in a year or so for the updates, in the mean time I am following the twitter feed and will enjoy that incredibly hot read-head (did I mention here already ? I feel like I did :).

08-16-10  11:10pm

Replies (12)
Review
16
Visit Beauty Angels

Beauty Angels
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 180 scenes and they update the site very heavily (I believe thy had an update per day for September so things are looking good)
- A lot of cute models doing mostly hardcore action (including a lot of anal and some lesbian anal toy play)
- Each set has video as well as images downloadable as zipped files. (Images are around 960px × 1,440px or 1,440px × 960px. Videos come in three categories high WMV files, Medium FLV and "portable" quality MP4)
- The network, while not perfect allows for easy log-in in all the websites you are a member off so you can easily search for more scenes featuring a particular model. Or you can try to use the advance search function which (almost always) returns pretty accurate results
- Each update has a nice tagging feature so you can quickly tell what the scene will contain, the model name age and date it was added onto the site.
- The action in the videos is varied and pretty hot for the most part. Good camerawork and nice models
Cons: - There are a lot of small issues with the site and the network in general, many of which I mentioned in my review of Fuckstudies. The thumbnails are not very revealing as to what happens in any given scene, downloads sometimes cut out for me. Many of the models are re-named so it makes it hard to find a particular model (Aspen is named Galina for example)A few of the links are broken taking you to the main page instead of where you wanted to go to. All models are 18, even if they have scenes on the site in 2009 and 2011.
- Aside from the network wide minor issues this site has a few odd quirks of it's own. Several of the scenes seem to be taken from other sites (some in the network some not.) They have at least one scene from Firstanalquest and a few from other sites.
- Along with the non-exclusive content the variation in the scenes is a bit strange. You have a few videos of solo girls with toys, some lesbian, some threesome, some hardcore anal. It all feels a bit chaotic
Bottom Line: I've been a member of this network for a long time on and off. My latest membership was probably a year and a half ago and a lot has changed since. They always used to have more unknown models doing pretty hardcore stuff with male models that looked about their age. Overall there was a feeling of home made amateur Russian videos, with kinda crappy lighting and awkward scenes (I remember a few where the male model couldn't get hard enough to properly fuck)

This all changed for the better since I was last on the website. The male models seem a lot more confident, the camera work is improved and the WMV high definition (which is not truly HD, but close) was a much needed addition. All the while the girls are still cute and a bit awkward, making for some very hot scenes. Note how I said some hot scenes, because not all scenes are that great.

Sadly, a few of the girls are not the most beautiful or young looking models out there, and while I know that what constitutes beauty is very subjective teens with massive fake boobs just seem off-putting on a site such as this. Also girls that seem really not into it or even in pain make for very bad scenes. It puzzles me how on the same site you get girls that positively seem to jump on the guys cock along with girls that look confused and generally uncomfortable with the whole deal.

Furthermore, to be honest the lesbian scenes didn't do it for me. On Lezcuties you get some very hot girls who seem all the way into it here maybe every other video seems to have that kind of passion. If you have a lesbian scene you must get girls that are into giving head, sucking nipples and caressing as opposed to just grabbing toys and jamming them in their partner.

Since we're talking about inconsistencies among models I guess I should mention the solo action. You have some models that do anal toys, some that fist themselves and some that just use their hands very delicately. Overall it's a bit strange and some more ways of filtering content would be nice.

I realize that criticizing models or their level of enthusiasm is a very subjective way to approach a site review, but the inconsistency between how the models act within the same network makes for an odd experience. I guess the fact that scenes are used from different places is to blame for this, but still, more careful selection of the scenes included in the site would help.

Also a way to quickly sort the type of scenes would help. It's strange to navigate the site and see 3 solo girls along with a hardcore anal gape all on the same page.

Better navigation in general would be nice. The site right now is a bit clumsy and the search failed me several times. For example I couldn't figure out a way to see just the models that appear on one site, probably no one cares about this feature since all sites seem very similar. I for one had hopped that Beauty angels would be more focused on solo, maybe some lesbian action, definitely more stripping and focus on the models. Instead half the scenes are identical to the rest of the network with brutal anal sex to the point where the rest seem out of place.

I guess the moral of the story is that you should join the whole network and expect more content similar to hardcoreyouth or analteenangels than met-art or nubiles. The focus is on hardcore action and while the site does deliver, at the end of the day I still felt like something was missing. The rest of the network offers enough other content to compensate but this particular site could benefit from a bit of reworking and a different approach.

Overall if you never joined the network or if some of the models seem incredibly attractive to you, a month of membership is not bad. But make sure that you also want the content on Fuckstudies, teenmoviemania and tricky masseur. If you want just anal action, Firstanalquest might be a better fit and if you're looking for hardcore gorgeous teens consider teencorenetwork.

09-08-11  12:16pm

Replies (0)
Review
17
Visit Becky's Dungeon

Becky's Dungeon
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 54 photo galleries with anywhere from 150 to 400 photos each. No zipped archives and the photo quality was very different ranging from 525px × 700px to 825px × 1100px.

- around 228 WMV (320x240) videos and about 12 MPEG videos. No streaming, just downloads. However the download speed is quite good. A minor inconvenience is that a lot of the larger scenes are split into two or three parts. Also some of the videos are not exclusive but rather taken from slave-videos.com

- around 64 cellphone videos. My phone doesn't support this mode so I couldn't say how good it is, but any 3g phone should work

- Scenes usually have a dominatrix and a submissive girl who is tied up and tortured in quite a lot of ingenious ways from needles through breasts to pumps, clamps and all sorts of twisting devices. A lot of focus on the breasts, some scenes don't even showing the girl's vagina. This doesn't mean that clamps on vagina's or penetrations are not present in some scenes, just not so often.
Cons: - A huge disproportion in the attractiveness and type of models used. From MILF's to Chubby and to Teens this site has almost every kind of model. And they don't have any way of sorting through them.

- In my opinion to much focus on the breasts. There are scenes where the girl still has pants on when they are done.

- Some scenes were a bit too graphic for me, the breasts turning purple or bloody from all the smacking and wax pouring and what not. But I guess that is a good thing if you're really into extreme breast mishandling.

- Poor quality on most videos. 320 is not really that good, also most scenes only run a few minutes.

- The photo galleries are ordered per model so in one photo gallery you may see the same model in 3 different outfits or stages of bondage. I wish they had made separate galleries for each one of those sets.

- Sometimes the quality of the lighting is questionable, making it hard to see what is going on. The small video resolution is also part of it.
Bottom Line: A good site for bondage, especially if you like breasts. Access to streaming videos from ABEE.net (I hope that's how it's spelled...a big network full of bondage videos) is a great bonus, and the exclusive content can satisfy anyone with a passion for abused women.

For me it didn't really work because it didn't have enough penetration or focus on the models (they have a brief description about the model and the shoot, but I usually like to see more, get familiar with a model before I see her abused...) Also I felt some stuff was way too graphic...

Unfortunately it seems that the newer updates are from slave-videos so they are not exclusive anymore. Also the 3-4 minute video clips don't really satisfy as they could if it was all a bigger video.

Overall, the site does some good things (exclusive content, some cute models, some very hardcore breast brutality) but does a bunch of other things wrong (lack of navigation features, not that much content, content isn't that qualitative, wide differences in how cute the models are/how big the photos are.)

I'd recommend it for anyone who really enjoys breasts with clamps on them or anyone curious to see girls covered in hot wax, but if purple breasts are not your thing, this site is really not for you. If you also don't care for streaming definitely look elsewhere.

09-02-09  02:50pm

Replies (0)
Review
18
Visit Brand New Faces

Brand New Faces
(0)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -many amateurs (around 120 videos I believe)
-exclusive content(as far as I can tell)
-hot interviews and sex scenes (look for the two cousins who show up together and then have sex on two different days)
-good streaming player(very fast and nice)
-pretty good previews
Cons: -a bit hard to navigate/download stuff
-many Latino women and not that many teens
-some videos are disappointing compared to the previews/what is promised
-not able to download videos
Bottom Line: Overall the site is a very nice amateur site, with funny girls that seem genuine as opposed to all the fake boobed girls out there. Most of them are also beautiful and ready to get dirty. The user-options leave one unsatisfied, however. Anyhow it's a site worth checking if you like interviews and sex scenes.

08-01-09  03:56pm

Replies (0)
Review
19
Visit British Doggers

British Doggers
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Maybe 11 videos and 78 photo sets of various quality (mostly really bad stuff, videos are around 320x240 and images are around 768px × 1,024px)
- They have zipped images and some hardcore action, some stripping, all outdoors
- The site came bundled in a network deal so I guess I didn't technically spend money on this particular site.
- Navigation worked okayish most of the time and the whole using the site experience was adequate (downloads worked, I didn't get kicked out suddenly and the links worked)
Cons: - Very few videos and few images. To make things worse the quality of most images and all videos is very poor. The scenes have inadequate lighting and for the most part mediocre camera work.
- No diverse options when downloading size or quality wise. In fact, overall the site looks like it was made 10-15 years ago and never updated the technical side
- Some sets look recycled from the '70 some look like they belong on a different network (I swear I saw a bangbus set on here) I don't think there is anything remarkable or interesting about the content, it seems all non -exclusive image sets from diverse places and poor quality clips.
- Nothing British about the models, no apparent rhyme or reason to the scenes. No modes page or way to easily browse the scenes.
- They have adds for other sites in the members section
- While they do daily updates it looks like they simply recycle content, the newer content looks just as bad as the old, with no foreseeable improvement.
Bottom Line: I don't know what you're interested in but this site doesn't have it, trust me you're probably better off with a Google image search. I have seen preview pages for some sites that were way more impressive than the members section of this site. Why? Well let's take a quick tour

The video section is a joke, 11 scenes at 320x 240 resolution with very, very generic porn action. Even more interesting the oldest video is from august this year and the most recent is from September, combined with the fact that all scenes look like they were filmed before digital cameras were invented it's pretty obvious they are recycling content.

The photo section is a bit better, we have around 80 sets with anywhere between 20 to 100 images each. Some look like behind the scene photos (the girl smiles next to a guy with a flaccid penis) some look like screengrabs from a hardcore movie and the rest look like old discolored photos you might find in your dad's collection.

The action in the scene is all over the place, there are some scenes where the girls don't even take their clothes off, some DP, some stripping outdoors, some dildo... overall a hodgepodge that doesn't make any sense. You have anything here from Hillary Scott deepthroating a dude to stuff that would maybe be at home on Met-art if they decided to give up on good quality, HD photos.

So the content is poor, the quality of the images and video is bad,the website navigates like an amateur project put together by someone with minimal HTML knowledge. There is no way to find specific categories of action or particular models, to get to the scenes you have to click the images, but not the texts, although they are links as well. Oh and don't even bother with streaming the videos, of navigating the images with their image browser that is also a joke and will break on you.

Overall there is nothing here that redeems the site. I got it as a special deal when I joined a network and was just impressed at the poor quality. If I had paid to be here I would demand my money back, it's simply a poor site. Maybe the sites they offer as bonus are better (I didn't check those out so maybe those are awesome and worth it... but I doubt it.)

09-16-11  04:46pm

Replies (3)
Review
20
Visit Brutal Dildos

Brutal Dildos
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 390 scenes (120 anal an the rest lesbian or vaginal) (Potentially way more videos with the network membership but had some errors, see bellow)
- Both American and Russian models of good quality :) What other site offers Aspen and Chastity on the same page?
- Earliest content is from 2005, but there seem to be a lot more recent updates, with several videos posted this year (07 of 2011 seems to have been a great time for them) (However the updates seem completely random)
- Very hot and very extreme action. I wouldn't say they are better than anal acrobats, but the site is up there. Great close-ups of massive gape, a lot of ass to mouth and indeed brutal dildos
- Very good looking models who truly seem to enjoy the action.
-Decent options when it comes to downloads (1920 WMV to 640 mp4 or mpg, although older content is just 640 and 320) Overall all the scenes I looked at were very decently lit and played well. Photos are zipped and good quality
Cons: - The main issue I had with the site was in the network area. For example the lesbian section of the site actually leads to huge strap-on lesbians site. This doesn't mean that brutal dildos doesn't have lesbian content it's just categorized under the solo archive. This would be fine if the links worked properly, but half the time trying to go to a different site in the network lead to me getting a big error and having to log back in. Which also meant that all the downloads I had going were canceled. In the end the webmaster was nice about it, but so far the issue is still not really fixed.

- Speaking of content being categorized wrong, there is no real way to sort through the scenes. You get a vaginal or anal dildo checkbox but that is it. No way to select the age of the model (which ranges quite a lot) or if she's Russian or American

- To make things worse the bonus pics and movies are a joke. Old content that looks dated and is hard to navigate.
Bottom Line: So what is the bottom line? The site promises brutal dildo action and delivers it plenty. Sure there are some quirks with the network and sure some of the models might not be the hottest girls on the planet (especially the older updates have some really questionable girls) but damn the site delivers.

Each video is about 20 minutes and they tend to start with the girls stripping a bit, playing with themselves and generally getting ready. Then we get one or two huge novelty dildos and depending on the video we get to see some incredible vaginal stretching or some massive anal gape. For the most part the girls seem really into it and suck the dildos periodically, play with themselves and look into the camera often enough. Also it's nice to see them riding the dildos and look really excited.
The enthusiasm of the girls is what really sells this site. I've been a member of many hardcore and anal sites and very often you get a girl that looks bored or uncomfortable, not here sir. This is one of those few sites where the models all seem into it and the fact that they do the insertions themselves seems to make most girls a lot more comfortable and open. Great job in that aspect.

So far the site seems great, enthusiasm, great action, decent videos, hot models (again, the more recent ones are great, with a few hidden gems in the archive) however there are several flaws that bring the score down.

One of the flaws inherent in a dildo site is that some scenes will simply look fake, when a girl kisses the balls of the dildo, trying to look sexy it sadly seems mostly stupid. I get that they should lick the dildos but why do they have to pretend it's a real cock? Also since no one is really cumming in these shots most scenes kinda just end. Some girls try to seem satisfied, but some just look the same and the video cuts to black. A bit more acting towards the end could really help some of these scenes.

Also for a site that is all about extreme insertions you get a surprisingly little amount of DP or variety among the toys (I swear I started to recognize the dildos from one scene to the other) I guess I'm a bit spoiled by Analacrobats, the ultimate when it comes to anal and dildos, but it just felt like this site could benefit from a bit of creativity. At least many of the models have stockings and cute outfits so that somewhat redeems things.

Finally one other thing that bothered me about content was that some "recent" updates are clearly older material (given away by both in the way the models look and act as well as the lack of a HD version of the video) I guess that is bound to happen but I still felt a bit cheated. To make things just a bit worse I found one or two videos from other sites. No big deal but a bit of a shame really.

I already mentioned that I had some connectivity issues with some sites in the network not automatically logging me in (most worked fine, but once it a while I'd get a bad cookie or something) Also, like I mentioned the bonus pic and movie section is mostly some very poor quality jpegs and some old DVD's that are really a let down.

But enough with the negative stuff. Like I said for the most part the site delivers and the network helps make it a decent deal, especially if you're bored with boy girl hardcore sex and you have most of Anal Acrobats already. There are some great scenes here and while you're bound to recognize many of the models they are still cute and willing to do some pretty crazy stuff for your entertainment.

Before you join do make sure you're okay with extreme dildo action. If you're troubled by girls gaping orifices, ass to mouth and other generally intense sex this is not for you.

09-09-11  11:36pm

Replies (2)
Review
21
Visit Butt Bomber

Butt Bomber
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 36 anal photo galleries with around 27-30 photos each at anywhere between 744px × 492px and 1024px × 678px A bunch of other bonus galleries brings up the number of photos but they are not anal (teen, tranny, mature, etc.) No zipped files

- more than 50 feeds through adultlegalporn2go mostly anal stuff but a bunch of other videos as well for streaming. It's stuff from DVD's though and it's all a mess, gay and straight feeds mixed together, teen and mature, a horrible mess...

- there are a bunch of videos (I'd say upward of 50) available for download as well as streaming but they are all from pretty famous anal DVD's (show me gape, anal driven, etc.) Also they are cut into around 20 pieces each which makes it a pain to download. Finally, browsing the videos is a pain

- the scenes are good, usually a selection of the best a certain DVD has to offer. But they are not exclusive.

- weekly updates

- bonus stories and e-zines such as guide to sex, advanced foreplay, etc.

- adult games
Cons: - this site has no exclusive content that I could find. It's all from DVD's and when you download the videos it will tell you which dvd it's taken from.

- the browsing is horrible. There is no search, there is no back button (yes you read that right no back button when you browse the galleries or videos) and there is now way to see an overarching All Videos or All galleries page.

- there are a dozen ads that flash, move around with the page and generally just annoy the heck out of me.

- each video scene is cut into pieces, a LOT of pieces around 20 or more each...

- overall just frustrating to deal with.
Bottom Line: I joined this site through a bigger offer and that is the only reason why I don't hate myself. I mean, don't get me wrong the site delivers a decent quantity of anal videos but there is no exclusive content and (this is the big problem I had) they butcher the DVD scenes they do offer into small videos that are a pain to download and merge together.

I have found several good scenes on this site and promptly added them into my Videobox favorites you know why? because Videobox allows you do do searches, has a much better streaming player and it lets you get the whole scene in one file.

Heck this site didn't even bother with a model search or uploading the whole DVD or maybe offering some way of seeing every scene before deciding on one.

To be fair the site does have one bonus over the likes of Videobox, namely that it offers photo galleries. But the images are not correlated with the videos and each gallery is only 20-30 photos big.

Add in the annoying ads (first thing when you log on is a big add that you must click in order to hide), the so called bonus features like a "free" chat room that takes you to another website or the poorly written stories (I guess I could pay a monthly fee to read x-rated stories on my laptop)

All and all the site has too many drawbacks to stand on it's own. The store is nice (some good discounts on anal DVD's) but other sites offer the same amount of DVD's as a free bonus (First Anal Quest) So yes you can get porn here, good quality porn, but in a butchered version, or you would join another site that offers a lot more for a smaller price.
Bottom line: Would not recomend

09-22-09  04:07pm

Replies (1)
Review
22
Visit Butt Man

Butt Man
(1)

60.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -New network design, and much easier to navigate interface. Also the site loads much faster

-Around 345 movies ranging in quality and age (from recent movies to 80's mullets it's all here)The lowest quality I could find was 512x 384 and there are about 39 HD scenes with more on the way.

- Streaming, downloading, navigation it's all pretty flawless and the new design of the site makes it easy to find specific categories of videos. The only issues I had was with HD streaming but that could be my internet connection.

- The site has a schedule of updates planed until 2011, each video coming with a small preview. A very nice addition that makes it a lot easier to see what you're getting in the future.

- Most scenes are hardcore with plenty of anal and a nice variation between more POV rough sex and old fashioned "story" based scenes. Most of the more recent updates are very good quality, but some of the older movies reminded me of grainy Italian porn I watched in my youth..
Cons: - A little bit to mainstream for my taste (see more in the bottom line.)

-There is a huge variation in the quality of the videos, from grainy porn filmed with a hand-held camera to very, very professional shots. There are a few amateurs (mostly Latino girls in the Bend Over Brazilian Babes DVD series) and mostly seasoned porn actresses, that you probably saw on other sites (not a lot of young models, BTW).

-The model browsing is nice, but feels lacking (I feel that maybe half the girls shown in the videos are in there and some don't even have a profile image.) All the male models are in there though if you want to quickly find all scenes Kid Jamaica shows up in (why you'd want to I have no clue...)

- The lack of images is very disappointing

- Sometimes streaming, especially for HD videos wouldn't allow me to skip through the video, again, this could be just my connection, so no bad karma for this.
Bottom Line: Up above I mentioned the very mainstream feel of the site, let me explain what I mean by that. Despite the variety in scenes most of the videos felt very similar to every other porn out there. Sure you get scenes filmed in the 80's and scenes filmed nowadays where the models look all shiny and the light is perfect, but it's almost like there is no difference between the two. The girls look like porn stars and the guys look like body building jerks. They are thrown together for some unlikely reason, standard fuck scene and then it's all over.

Of course, this is the recipe for most porn, but when all the girls look similar (they all have that porn star look) you need more than the classic recipe to make for an interesting site. Give me interviews with the girls, extreme close-ups or some funky costumes, which are all things that other sites do...

Maybe I got spoiled by some of those sites, but for some reason Buttman felt very commercial, almost to the point where it wasn't fun and virtually indistinguishable from other mainstream sites (the only way to tell I wasn't on Hustler was that some scenes were in Italian and there were fewer scenes). At the end of the day, sure we have anal and ass eating and hardcore, but if you were to randomly pick a porn DVD out of a bargain bin you'd probably get something very similar to the Buttman site. Which begs the question, why should I buy a membership here when I can get Videobox for much cheaper? Or the before mentioned Hustler where I also get some funny porn parodies and a ton more DVD's?

The few highlights of the site are the Fashionista DVD where you get Sasha Gray in pleather and there are also some scenes from Faye and Gianna Michaels, so those are kinda interesting. Also American Anal Sluts, their newest series shows a lot of promise as the girls seem a lot more "real," more honest and that makes them a lot more interesting (considering that series is the most viewed on the site it seems like most people agree with me).

So what is the bottom line? I was unimpressed by the site and had it not come with Anal Acrobats, which is an excellent anal lesbian site, I wouldn't have bothered. There are better anal sites out there and better mainstream porn sites (first anal quest and videobox) It's interesting to see the time travel from the old scenes where we have hairy women and men in pink shorts to the modern POV scenes with Russian models, but considering only about 50 or so scenes are truly worth saving...not sure if it makes sense to sign up. Before you decide in it check out the rest of the network and if you really like some other site, this is a nice bonus, otherwise I'd say you're not missing much.

Maybe in a year or so, one the new HD videos are up and they have more interviews and unique videos, maybe...

11-16-10  12:49pm

Replies (2)
Review
23
Visit Cable Guy Sex

Cable Guy Sex
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - around 60 HD videos (1280 per 800 I believe) as well as access to the whole HD porn pass network.

- around 20 photo galleries with around 100-200 photos each at 685px × 1024px. No zipped files

- if you have a fetish for a cable guy this is the place for it. The guy will wear a hardhat most of the time and the girls occasionally do nibble on the actual cable. Other than that this is a pretty regular porn site, with some group sex and some good old guy on girl. I have no clue as to why this deserved an independent site as opposed to being part of geek girl sex or teenage whores, but I guess it does...

- most models are hot and the videos are very good quality although the content is pretty standard...

- easy navigation and good servers.

- the network is awesome if you want HD porn. One of the best out there.
Cons: - scenes are rather short and they are often cut into multiple parts so the actual number of videos you get is not 60 but more like 25.

- the image gallery isn't really worth it.

- videos all save with generic name...had to go back and rename everything

- does anyone actually have a fetish for cable guys? I mean the whole pizza delivery guy was kinda funny but this site borders on weird. It's a niche that didn't need filling I feel like...
nonetheless as part of the HD network this is an okay deal, just adding some more sex scenes.
Bottom Line: This site is rather small compared to others in this network and the content isn't really that unique or special that it would motivate a sale. I guess it's another website in the network and maybe it can tip the balance towards buying a membership, but not by much.

The scenes are good and the HD is awesome (I have never seen genitalia glisten like they do in these videos...very cool) but there isn't anything above regular porn here. Expect middle of the road material with average girls, but in HD. I said this before but I'll repeat it becuase it bears keeping in mind. This is a big site and it feels like one. The content is similar to what you'd expect in Playboy or Hustler. It's hot and the girls look gorgeous but most of the time they are middle of the road.

If you have a particular preference for anal, rough, teen, lesbian, mature, etc. then you can probably find a better site for the same price. If you don't know what kinda porn you like or if you like the big magazines but don't want to join them, then HD porn pass is for you. (Thy also have a great Indian porn section...) Otherwise, and especially if the HD doesn't sound amazing keep looking.

Personally, I only came back to this site due to the bonus section of Teen Models (join it and get the HD porn pass for free...much better deal...)

All in all, a good site that targets middle of the road people and cable guy fans.

10-17-09  05:34pm

Replies (0)
Review
24
Visit Cartoon Hardcore

Cartoon Hardcore
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -a bunch of images in pretty good quality. Nothing that looks like it was drawn by monkey having a seizure, however, a lot of the updates are just random hentai (Japanese cartoon porn) images and I swear some were stolen straight from old hentai video games.

-One of two of the cartoon strips were actually kinda funny/ mildly interesting. But overall not worth the hassle.

- hmm...I actually think that was about it when it comes to the good stuff...
Cons: - I have yet to find a good cartoon porn website, but this is not it, here are just some complaints I have:

-Bad navigation, the whole site looks like it was made in the 80's and has no way to navigate the images easily.

-No videos, some animated gif's but nothing really interesting

-No updates since 2001,

-No zip downloads, unforgivable for a site that only has images.

-Content that seems stolen from video games and other sites (one cartoon strip even had a watermark for cartoon sex.com on it)

-Nonexistent customer support.
Bottom Line: A friend of mine who is much more passionate about hentai showed me the site as an example of how NOT to run a porn webpage. The place is poorly managed, has almost no original content and the bets images and strips seem stolen from other places.

Compared to a place like Jab which creates original cartoon porn this is a joke. It's nothing more than a random collection of google images, at best. on top of it all, most of the content is just 3D images with all the appeal of a piece of clay.

On the very, very small positive side, most of the images are decently drawn (probably because they were made by artists outside the site who then had their work stolen) and some content was amusing. Sadly I couldn't download anything because there was no zipped archive and I couldn't even move through the images with a back and forth command ( you click on an image then go back and click on another and so on until you decide it's not worth it and leave the site)

Bottom line: I am amazed that such a bad site still exists out there and truly recommend people avoid it. There is nothing redeeming on there and considering the last update the whole network is probably long dead. If you really like cartoon porn, go and check out Jab, it will be a much better experience. Or join a bigger network that has hentai as a niche site. Please skip this one though.

06-25-10  05:57pm

Replies (0)
Review
25
Visit Casting Couch Teens

Casting Couch Teens
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - They claim around 2000 scenes, I counted around 150 on this site and a few more bonus scenes, however you get access to an entire network so maybe if you add everything up you'd eventually get 2000 (a pretty nice network btw. with a lot of young adult action).
- Scenes are available as clips or WMV at around 480x 360. Sadly no HD available as far as I can tell
- Images are available at around 667px × 1,000 but no zipped archive as far as I could tell
- Some seriously hot teens, some of them exclusive (of at least I haven't seen them around) and some pretty well known porn stars. The action is very hot, although we never get more than the standard boy girl scene (no anal, no deepthroat etc.)
- Several of the girls are pretty good actors or really, really enjoy the sex. If you join check out Carmella Diamond getting her ass licked. I have not seen a girl moan that much in quite some time.
- Okay download speeds, no issues with time-out or log outs. Okay webdesign
Cons: - The entire network doesn't seem to update anymore. Which is really a shame. I think they occasionally throw a video up, but months go by without anything new.
- The quality of the videos is poor. Fuzzy images, poor light in some scenes and while the images are better they can't really save the site from a technical aspect.
- Web design is way too basic. No real search options, the descriptions of the scenes are very bare bones. The whole network here feels outdated and desperately in need of some love.
Bottom Line: I am really saddened about this site. The models they have are great, a lot of very, very cute girls (they even have the Cherish & Cali twins doing an appearance). They have a nice mix of better known models as well as some girls I never heard of.

What is even better is that all the girls involved look very realistic. I couldn't tell if the orgasms were faked and quite often you actually believe that these are naive teens surprised that this is a porn audition. Great job, I wish that all porn sites had models this dedicated.

Even better each scene is long, at around 30 minutes. They start off with an interview that turns sexual pretty quick. In a way it reminded me of the Back room casting couch site or Exploited college girls, but the models here know what they are getting into and play along very nicely. Instead of awkward giggles and shyness you get some gorgeous looking girls playing coy and it actually works.

However, that is pretty much where the good things stop and the negative aspects come in. The content is great, but the quality is horrible. VLC player crashed twice when I tried playing these clips. I get strange green screens and fuzzy images. The resolution is bad and the light in some scenes is terrible. You have a great looking girl give head to a dude and look in the camera just as the whole screen becomes a mess of pixels.

Streaming requires extra plug-ins, no zipped archives for images and what they call the photo gallery is screencaps from the movie. You want the digital stills for the actual photos, which half the time are overexposed anyway.

To make things even worse the updates are slow to come, maybe one every few months or so. I think since the last time I joined (2009 I believe) they added about 5 or 6 scenes, all in the same bad quality.

Now, on the positive side you get access to a few other great sites like teeny bopper club and big cock teen addiction, both of which also have awesome content, (with the same technical limitations sadly)

Bottom-line: If you like teen content I'd join this site once just to get all the awesome content, and never come back. They wasted some great models on shitty web design and poor video quality.

P.S. The 69 is only because I absolutely love the models here and the way they act. Otherwise this would be a 50

11-07-11  07:18pm

Replies (4)

Shown : 1-25 of 130 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.52 seconds.