Beauty Angels (2)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
||- Around 180 scenes and they update the site very heavily (I believe thy had an update per day for September so things are looking good)
- A lot of cute models doing mostly hardcore action (including a lot of anal and some lesbian anal toy play)
- Each set has video as well as images downloadable as zipped files. (Images are around 960px × 1,440px or 1,440px × 960px. Videos come in three categories high WMV files, Medium FLV and "portable" quality MP4)
- The network, while not perfect allows for easy log-in in all the websites you are a member off so you can easily search for more scenes featuring a particular model. Or you can try to use the advance search function which (almost always) returns pretty accurate results
- Each update has a nice tagging feature so you can quickly tell what the scene will contain, the model name age and date it was added onto the site.
- The action in the videos is varied and pretty hot for the most part. Good camerawork and nice models
||- There are a lot of small issues with the site and the network in general, many of which I mentioned in my review of Fuckstudies. The thumbnails are not very revealing as to what happens in any given scene, downloads sometimes cut out for me. Many of the models are re-named so it makes it hard to find a particular model (Aspen is named Galina for example)A few of the links are broken taking you to the main page instead of where you wanted to go to. All models are 18, even if they have scenes on the site in 2009 and 2011.
- Aside from the network wide minor issues this site has a few odd quirks of it's own. Several of the scenes seem to be taken from other sites (some in the network some not.) They have at least one scene from Firstanalquest and a few from other sites.
- Along with the non-exclusive content the variation in the scenes is a bit strange. You have a few videos of solo girls with toys, some lesbian, some threesome, some hardcore anal. It all feels a bit chaotic
||I've been a member of this network for a long time on and off. My latest membership was probably a year and a half ago and a lot has changed since. They always used to have more unknown models doing pretty hardcore stuff with male models that looked about their age. Overall there was a feeling of home made amateur Russian videos, with kinda crappy lighting and awkward scenes (I remember a few where the male model couldn't get hard enough to properly fuck)
This all changed for the better since I was last on the website. The male models seem a lot more confident, the camera work is improved and the WMV high definition (which is not truly HD, but close) was a much needed addition. All the while the girls are still cute and a bit awkward, making for some very hot scenes. Note how I said some hot scenes, because not all scenes are that great.
Sadly, a few of the girls are not the most beautiful or young looking models out there, and while I know that what constitutes beauty is very subjective teens with massive fake boobs just seem off-putting on a site such as this. Also girls that seem really not into it or even in pain make for very bad scenes. It puzzles me how on the same site you get girls that positively seem to jump on the guys cock along with girls that look confused and generally uncomfortable with the whole deal.
Furthermore, to be honest the lesbian scenes didn't do it for me. On Lezcuties you get some very hot girls who seem all the way into it here maybe every other video seems to have that kind of passion. If you have a lesbian scene you must get girls that are into giving head, sucking nipples and caressing as opposed to just grabbing toys and jamming them in their partner.
Since we're talking about inconsistencies among models I guess I should mention the solo action. You have some models that do anal toys, some that fist themselves and some that just use their hands very delicately. Overall it's a bit strange and some more ways of filtering content would be nice.
I realize that criticizing models or their level of enthusiasm is a very subjective way to approach a site review, but the inconsistency between how the models act within the same network makes for an odd experience. I guess the fact that scenes are used from different places is to blame for this, but still, more careful selection of the scenes included in the site would help.
Also a way to quickly sort the type of scenes would help. It's strange to navigate the site and see 3 solo girls along with a hardcore anal gape all on the same page.
Better navigation in general would be nice. The site right now is a bit clumsy and the search failed me several times. For example I couldn't figure out a way to see just the models that appear on one site, probably no one cares about this feature since all sites seem very similar. I for one had hopped that Beauty angels would be more focused on solo, maybe some lesbian action, definitely more stripping and focus on the models. Instead half the scenes are identical to the rest of the network with brutal anal sex to the point where the rest seem out of place.
I guess the moral of the story is that you should join the whole network and expect more content similar to hardcoreyouth or analteenangels than met-art or nubiles. The focus is on hardcore action and while the site does deliver, at the end of the day I still felt like something was missing. The rest of the network offers enough other content to compensate but this particular site could benefit from a bit of reworking and a different approach.
Overall if you never joined the network or if some of the models seem incredibly attractive to you, a month of membership is not bad. But make sure that you also want the content on Fuckstudies, teenmoviemania and tricky masseur. If you want just anal action, Firstanalquest might be a better fit and if you're looking for hardcore gorgeous teens consider teencorenetwork.
Reply To Review