Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : hugow (3)  

Feedback:   All (11)  |   Reviews (7)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (4)

Other:   Replies Received (9)  |   Trust Ratings (16)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-8 of 8  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(3)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The girls are still beautiful. They focus on Ivana, Masha, and a few others.
Cons: I wrote a previous review for this site when it was youngporn.net and I thought it was so good I needed to terminate my membership early because I was spending so much time there.

This time round, I'm quitting early for a completely different reason. The servers are so slow this site is unusable. Every page takes forever to load.

On top of that, they have a "100% satisfaction guaranteed" sticker on their join page. Of course, two requests that they terminate my membership and refund my money went unanswered. I'm cutting my losses and just terminating.
Bottom Line: I'm not going back a third time.

01-02-11  02:07pm

Replies (5)
Review
2
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(4)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Drop-dead gorgeous MET-Art quality nubile models who, for the most part, you haven't seen elsewhere and who are not necessarily eastern european.
* Top quality photo and video shoots, though in smaller quantities than the usual sites.
* Imagine Met-Art with some hc: that's what you get here. There's not much b/g though it's increasing. Fair amount of toy insertion and a bit of soft Met-Art style g/g.
* Virtually no anal, gonzo, or other tasteless stuff.
Cons: * Boy/girl content is very limited but growing.
* No ability to "save" a favorite model.
* No ability to search for particular model types, though with the current relatively small amount of content, this isn't a problem. In fact it's a pleasure to look through the cover shots.
* No slideshow view. This is a must on a photo site of this quality.
* Would love to see a few more models with at least a bit of pubic hair.
Bottom Line: X-Art is that rare thing in the porn world: a truly erotic site. Not only are the models drop-dead gorgeous, but the photographer actually believes in editing. The result is quality, not quantity; eroticism not anatomy. The hc shoots, though limited in number, are tasteful and hot, though there are still far too many of the obligatory facial cum-shots that pervade porn these days. The non-hc content is so sexy that it works for me, even though I usually need a little "more." I also agree with one of the other reviewers that a bit more story-line and less studio shoot would be useful. I'd also love to see some real "behind the scenes" stuff to accompany some of the shoots.

With more hc content and a few more website features like slideshow and save favorite models, I would have given this site a 95. As it is, it's a great site for the price.

10-05-10  10:53am

Replies (2)
Review
3
Visit Explicite Art

Explicite Art
(2)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Beautiful, natural looking Euro women, with a variety of different looks and ethnicities, though mostly French-speaking. I view this as a nice change from the sites that have gorgeous but exclusively Eastern European women. A few women have some pubic hair left, which I view as extremely sexy, but most are shaved.

The photography and filming is top-notch.

The scenes are staged somewhat more naturally and are more varied than many porn sites, even though most of them are still in-studio under strobes. I liked seeing the studio set-up.

Performances also seemed somewhat more natural and hotter than on other sites. The men and women seemed less detached than in the Eastern Euro sites like teensexmovs etc.
Cons: No ability to save to Favorites.
Very limited search capabilities.
Many of the films come in two parts and need to be downloaded separately.
No streaming video.
No vidcaps, though virtually all of the films have a corresponding HQ photo shoot.
Way too much extreme HC for my taste. Most of the shoots end with anal. There is also peeing, fisting, and enormous dildo use. Maybe this is all now mainstream, but I find it a turn-off and sad. I hate to think that my kids, let alone my daughter, may come to think that these behaviors are a "normal" part of the sexual repertoire
Bottom Line: Explicite has no lack of beautiful women and original high quality content in terms of production values. However, the site needs work in terms of navigation options.

As for the content, it certainly lives up to its name. A little too well for my taste.

07-24-10  04:54pm

Replies (0)
Review
4
Visit Teen Sex Movs

Teen Sex Movs
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Cute euro girls doing exactly what the site says: having sex. Not too much anal, gonzo, violence, tastelessness. Fairly frequent updates.
Cons: Very poor navigation, no search functions, poorly organized with multiple model names. Older recycled content. Very slow download speeds. No slideshow option for photos. Only wmv format for vids.
Bottom Line: Teensexmovs is now the orphaned sibling of its newer sister sites, teensexmania and now Nubile Girls HD (not to be confused with Nubiles.net, though I'm sure that's the point). The content is basically the same on all three sites and each is accessible as a "bonus site" on the others. But the others have much faster download speeds, though not a hell of a lot else.

This is the second time I've become a member of this site. About a year ago, it seemed much better and fresher to me. Now it seems tired. The slow downloads suggest that it's being abandoned by its owners.

As far as the content goes, the girls are really cute but the sex situations are pretty much all the same: indoors on a bed. It is also really a turn-off when you see really cute girls, and some of the studs, chewing gum while they fuck. I mean really. Can we have some simulation of enjoyment, please?

Right now the best euro teen site for my money might be younglegalporn.net (formerly youngporn.net). Does everything reasonably well, and the girls are MET-art quality -- in fact many of them are MET girls.

05-20-10  11:29am

Replies (2)
Review
5
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Stunningly gorgeous models, photographed in the most tasteful settings.
Cons: This isn't soft porn -- it's flaccid porn. No heat at all. Cover thumbnails are small and difficult to see. Many sets don't seem to have working slideshows.
Bottom Line: After years of depriving myself of a MET-ART membership, I finally succumbed. What a disappointment. Maybe I'm just jaded, but MET-ART could be the perfect antidote to porn addiction. In the end, it's just one beautiful naked, hairless girl after another. Absolutely no heat, no spontaneity, no nothing. Vogue without the clothes. If that's your thing, go for it.

04-29-10  11:10am

Replies (4)
Review
6
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(3)

90.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Very beautiful young euro adults in a decent variety of stuff ranging from soft-core model shoots to hardcore. Site navigation is reasonably good. Movie and picture quality is adequate too.
Cons: Some people might complain that the site has an undue concentration on a few well-known girls like Ivana Fukalot, Masha and a few others. These girls are so beautiful that it doesn't bother me one bit.
Site navigation, save, and search options could be improved, but these are quibbles.
Sex scenes tend to be formulaic, but that's just porn isn't it.
Bottom Line: About as close to MET-Art hardcore as you can get. I'd say this site and teensexmovs are my favorites in the young adult category. I had to ask them to terminate my access before my subscription ran out because, as a porn addict, I was spending way too much time on the site.

04-01-10  10:34am

Replies (2)
Review
7
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams
(1)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Search and navigation functions are fairly good, and I like the "Add to Favorites" feature. Lots of cute models.
Cons: Not that much hardcore in relation to solo and lesbo. Seems like the updates are really from shoots that took place a few years ago. Difficult to tell which shoots are hc, solo, lesbo etc.
Bottom Line: For a big, well-established site, I was a bit disappointed. Models and shoots seem a bit dated, with the best models being ones that were hot a few years ago. For the money, I think I prefer Nubiles.net.

09-09-09  11:29am

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit Teen Pink Videos

Teen Pink Videos
(0)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Beautiful young girls, plenty of original content, zip files for photos, good movie options
Cons: Very poor navigation options. No ability to browse by anything other than model name or "date added." No ability to save to "favorites."

Very little HD Movie content.
Bottom Line: Good stuff, but suffers from below average navigation.

07-27-09  11:56am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-8 of 8  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.46 seconds.