Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (1)

hugow (4) 04-29-10  11:10am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Stunningly gorgeous models, photographed in the most tasteful settings.
Cons: This isn't soft porn -- it's flaccid porn. No heat at all. Cover thumbnails are small and difficult to see. Many sets don't seem to have working slideshows.
Bottom Line: After years of depriving myself of a MET-ART membership, I finally succumbed. What a disappointment. Maybe I'm just jaded, but MET-ART could be the perfect antidote to porn addiction. In the end, it's just one beautiful naked, hairless girl after another. Absolutely no heat, no spontaneity, no nothing. Vogue without the clothes. If that's your thing, go for it.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


PinkPanther (46) Different tastes. I love Met-Art, find their stuff quite erotic.

The photo-sets, that is. The vids still seem like they are made as examples of the most boring vids ever made.

04-29-10  04:39pm

Reply To Message


Denner (235) Been back to MetArt year after year - and still: my collection consists of very few MetArt-materials - mostly some photosets (forget the videos).
And again: I read this bottom line by hugow several times - and even if I like SOME MetArt photosets - I'm getting "partial" (like Virgil Tibbs said in the movie "In The Heat of The Night") to the bottom line by hugow.....can't help it...is this "inflation" of porn?
Is this just a going on and on in the same deal - for ever?

05-01-10  07:04am

Reply To Message


hugow (4) REPLY TO #1 - PinkPanther :

I agree -- the photo-sets are much better than the movies, which are a complete waste of time.
05-03-10  03:01pm

Reply To Message


Monahan (42) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

Agree with Denner. I'm a video guy and quit Met-Art after about 3 months. The photo sets are good with a lot of full spreads and excellent angles. But I agree; no heat at all, no insertions and very little eroticism.
09-03-10  11:46pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.