Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : nadiencendia (83)  

Feedback:   All (256)  |   Reviews (52)  |   Comments (31)  |   Replies (173)

Other:   Replies Received (130)  |   Trust Ratings (42)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 59 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit 21Sextury.com


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Amazing quantity of content: +10.000 scenes right now.
-Good quality of content: well filmed, well lit, well performed...
-Gorgeus European models: Sophie Moone, Sandy, Eve Angel, Blue Angel and MANY more.
-Different niches: lesbian, BJ, feet, squirting, interracial...
-Videos are offered in streaming and for download, with different qualities.
-Newest videos are offered in HD; older videos may have lower definition.
-No daily download limit.
-New fun sections: interactive videos and live cams.
-Price is quite reasonable, specially with the PornUsers special discount.
-No regional pricing.
Cons: -Navigation is confusing: all the sites look exactly the same and somtimes is difficult to find your way around.
-Some links and taps do not seem to work (I haven't managed to use the filters in scene search, for instance)
-Scenes get repetitive after a while
-Some sites are no longer updating (e.g. BlueAngelLive) or are updated every now and then (e.g. SweetSophieMoone)
Bottom Line: This site/network is a classic for me: I keep coming back every now and then, since I discovered PixandVideo and ClubSandy ages ago. I am a recurring customer, so as you would imagine my comments will be generally positive.

First of all, this site is huge. No matter what kind of sex you are into, you will most probably find it here; no matter how fast you watch or download porn, you will never get to see all that there is to see here.

The second big asset of this site are the girls: mostly European girls, including some of our most beloved classics: Sophie Moone, Sandy, Eve Angel, Blue Angel... It is true that some of these girls do not work for 21Sextury as much as they used to (Eve Angel has her own official site with DDF now, and Blue Angel apparently has also decided to go in another direction with her career); but users will be happy to find dozens of scenes of these hot models, as well as hundreds of others less know but equally beautiful.

As for video quality, I think it is more than acceptable; in fact, the most recent videos are so HD that they may be as big as 700Mb. Older sets (which when they were filmed in 2002 looked to us crystal clear) may seem a bit grainy and are better watched in a smaller player.

As for the scenes themselves, they are very professionally made: they have lots of light, lots of colour (sometimes even a little too much if you ask me), girls always look awesome and both image and sound are impecable. My only complain (and "complain" may be too strong a word) is that after a while scenes get a little repetitive: same movements, same positions, same angles... Maybe it is not 21Sextury's fault: maybe there is just so many ways that you can perform sex in front of a camera...

Another great aspect about this site is its price, specially with the PornUsers special discount and with no annoying regional prices. The site also includes a separate "credit" system, which has to be bought separately and gives you access to the new "Live Cams" and "Interactive Sex" scenes.

The weakest aspect of this site is probably navigation: all sites have been morphed to have exactly the same look, the same structure and the same navigation tools, which could be fine, except that some of this tools don't work that well (scene filters, for instance, or some of the link tabs), and sometimes it is not easy to move from one site to another, or from one site to the main network page. In general, I miss the old days when ClubSandy or PixAndVideo had very recognizable looks, for instance...

In general, this network offers great quantity and quality for a good value. For me it has lost a little bit of its initial charm now that everthing looks too "uniform", but for new members it will be a very good investment.

09-02-12  11:08am

Replies (4)
Visit Streamate.com


Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Hundreds (thousands?) of girls from all over the world
-All girls have video and chat, some also have sound (music and/or voice)
-You can peek at the girls for free (until they kick you out of their chat)
-Some girls are stunning
-Some famous actresses use this service (Anita Dark, for instance)
-Billing is clear and efficient
-You can set a maximum daily spending limit
-Customer service is amazingly good
Cons: -Not all girls are equally good-looking (in fact some are utterly unattractive)
-Most girls don't respect their announced schedule (if they have one), and at some hours there are very few online
-Navigation and search options could be improved
-Prices are quite high and variable
-Quality of videos is also different from one girl to another
-Almost no sense of community (their loss...)
Bottom Line: I recently discovered this site because I follow Anita Dark on Twitter and she uses this platform for her webcam shows. And I got hooked quite rapidly. You have access to an amazingly big catalog of women (some are stunning; others are just ok; others are straight ugly) who are ready to satisfy most of your needs and requests.

As a new customer, the best idea is probably to peek into the free version of some of the hot girls' chats, adding the ones you like to your favs, and then returning to them for private or exclusive sessions when you feel like it. Some girls allow you to chat with them for free for a while, traying to lure you into their pvt webcam sessions; others are quite direct: the first thing one girl said to me was "pvt or leave, bb". In my opinion, that's a huge marketing mistake: even if the girl was quite hot, I left :)

My experience with this site so far has been quite good: after navigating the catalog for a while (which can be a bit difficult, because search options are a bit confusing) I chose a bunch of girls (my favorite two are lucky.star and SexyAngel1, by the way) and started chatting with them. After seeing that she were nice enough, and absolutely stunning, I decided to go for a private session with lucky.star. I had already told her what I wanted, and she went straight to business. I was one satisfied customer.

The most important con of this site is its price. The price per minute in private sessions vary from 1.75 to 3.50 (judging from what I have seen so far), so if you stay for a while with a model, the bill can get a bit steep. You can also set a maximum limit per day (25 is the lowest), but even so, you could end up expending 750 in one month... :) You also have to pay extra to access some "celebrity chats" or to watch previously recorded sessions of some girls. It's all about the money, you know...

I also have to add a word about their customer service, which, at least for me, has been excellent. I had a problem with my account; a live support pop-up window opened up in the site itself, and somebody from their customer service help me solve it; I also had a couple of questions about ratings and video quality, and I recieved an immediate email response from them. Way to go, guys!

03-23-11  07:14am

Replies (0)
Visit Nude Fight Club

Nude Fight Club

Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good to High quality videos and several download and streaming options
-Good quality pictures, downloadable as a .zip file
-They have convinced some of their top stars (Blue Angel, Sophie Moone...) to be part of this site
-Updated twice a week (aprox.)
-Part of the 21st Sextury site network (offered as a loyalty bonus)
Cons: -Action and setting are always the same (boring!)
-Not all models are equally good looking (although average is high)-
-Archive is still small to medium-sized (77 sets right now, some of them backstage sets)
Bottom Line: I was one of the people who "meh-ed" when I saw that they were opening this site and adding it to the 21st Sextury network. Well, after tree months I have got access to the site thanks to the loyalty bonus, and my opinion is, well... meh.

I should clarify that I am not that much into catfights and nude wrestling. It's not one of my favorite niche. It can be hot, if it is well done; but it can also get quite boring. That is the case, in my opinion, with this site. The reason is that the setting of the videos is always the same (a boxing ring, always the same boxing ring), and the action are also more or less the same: the two girls fight more or less passionately for a while, they take each others' clothes off, and they end by licking each other or rubbing against each other. This last part is sometimes hot; but it's not much different from what we get in other sites.

I wouldn't say this sit is bad, specialy considering that it is offered as a loyalty bonus; but it lacks any imagination or variety. Why not change the setting, add some oil, water or mud from time to time, tell the girls to do other stuff (I don't know what, something, anything).

Also, another thing that I don't quite like are the backstage sets. I have spoken against them in other sites as well; here, they don't take so much space from "real" updates, but the problem is, they are too similar to the actual scenes that are posted separately: they are, basically, just the same scenes, filmed with a different camera from a differente (wider) angle. A cheap way of having two sets for the price of one.

Bottom line: not a bad site if you get it as a bonus; if you are really into female nude wrestling, I would bet that you can find better stuff out there -although I haven't checked.

01-18-11  06:59am

Replies (2)
Visit Squirting Files

Squirting Files

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Some of the best "squirters" (Cytherea, Flower Tucci) are here
-Girls do squirt "something"
-The site is updated every week
-Good video quality and different streaming and download options
-Pictures in .zip files
Cons: -Archive is quite small (94 sets right now)
-Few to no extras or bonus content
-Not all models are equally hot
Bottom Line: When I wrote my previous (now expired) review, I said that the site was not updating any more (there is in fact a two year gap between July 2007 and May 2005 in which the site was not updated); well, since then, 21st Sextury has brought this site back to live, and it is now regularly updated with a new set every week.

I won't get into the discussion of whether squirting is real or not; whether it's cum, urine or any other vaginal fluid. Girls in this sets do squirt some colorless liquid, as a result of vaginal and G-spot stimulation: that's all I can say for sure. And for me that's enough.

This site is an exception in the 21st Sextury network, in that it includes sets by well-known American actresses like Cytherea, Aubrey Addams or Flower Tucci, and not so much by the usual Eastern European models that are its trademark. (Maybe Eastern European girls do not know how to squirt?).

This site is, in general, good-not-great, even if you are into squirting videos: the models are not stunning; the archive is still not that big, and you get no bonus content or extras. Also, some of the models don't look like they are having that a great time: it is more like they are being squeezed than "pleasured".

I wouldn't quite recommmend this site as an individual site; as a part of a network, it's ok, but we all know that 21st Sextury can do better; and that there are other better squirting sites out there...

01-09-11  09:29am

Replies (0)
Visit Deep Throat Frenzy

Deep Throat Frenzy

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of 21st Sextury network
-Models are cute and sexy in general
-Different video options (streaming and download; low, medium and high quality)
-Pictures are downloadable as a zip file
Cons: -It was last updated in 2008
-Archive has only 84 scenes
-You won't find models such as Sophie Moone, Blue Angel, Sandy or Eve Angel here
-Videos are strictly focused on blowjobs (see bottom line)
Bottom Line: I am not a great fan of blowjobs, so this site is not essentially my ideal type; I decided to write this review because I wrote a previous one when the site was still alive, and there are no active member reviews for it.

This site is another one of those that 21st Sextury offers in its bundle, to fill it and increase the number of "offered sites": it's basically a dead site, last updated in 2008, with a fairly small archive (84 video+pictures sets), focused exclusively on blowjobs.

Models in the site are usually ok, although, being slightly more kinky than other 21sextury sites (such as Clubsandy or Pixandvideo) you won't find here some of the stars that we have all come to love: Sophie Moone, Eve Angel, Sandy, Blue Angel...

As for the technical details, the same pros and cons as for other 21sextury sites apply: quality of videos and pictures is good, they offer several download options, pictures in .zip files, etc. Bonus content is non-existant, unless you consider like that the 21st Sextury network in which this site is included.

To sum up, this is a very limited site, placed in a very specific niche, and no longer updated. You really have to love blowjobs to like this site.

01-09-11  08:59am

Replies (0)
Visit Blue Angel Live

Blue Angel Live

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Blue Angel. Cute, gorgeus, fresh, funny. Truly amazing.
-The site is part of the 21st Sextury network, so you get it quite cheap.
-Good picture and video quality (several options for download, and also streaming option)
-Acceptable website design (although it could be improved)
-Acceptable but not huge archive (88 videos exactly)
-Varied content (solo, g/g, b/g, foot fetish, wrestling, etc.)
Cons: -Random and very limited updates lately
-No personal contact with Blue Angel
-Almost no bonus content
-Search options are limited
-Content is not always exclusive
Bottom Line: Oh, how happy I was when I saw that 21st Sextury was opening a site devoted to Blue Angel, one of my favorite models of all times, cute as a button, sexy as hell, and judging by her interviews and backstage videos, nice and funny too! But after a year and a half of existence, my ilusions have quickly decayed, and I no longer see this site as becoming one of my favorites...

And the reason is that it offers almost no new content (no new updates since november, for instance) and Blue Angel doesn't seem to be quite involved in the site (no diary, chat or bonus content from her). Maybe, as I said in other occasions, they wanted this site to replace Sweet Sophie Moone, and now that Sophie is back they don't need it any longer; or maybe Blue Angel decided to take her career elsewhere (to the US, for example) leaving 21sextury with no new content from her... I don't know. But with its current content and update frequency, this site is no longer attractive.

As for the rest, you get the usual 21st Sextury pros and cons: you have several video download options (from low to HD quality), you can stream videos, picture quality is good, web design is fairly ok (although search options continue to be quite limited); customer support could be improved (I sent them a message some weeks ago about a problem with streaming; never heard back from them), etc.

My bottom line is quite simple: I would never, NEVER recommend this site as an individual site, except for people who are crazy in love with Blue Angel and want to get very good quality stuff from her; as a site that is part of a bigger network, it is acceptable, but only as far as they catch up with updates and start offering exclusive content (most of the sites added recently can also be accessed in other 21st Sextury sites). It's a pity, because I really was hoping that this could become a web porn classic; unfortunately, I'm afraid it won't...

12-29-10  03:30am

Replies (0)
Visit Vivid


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good video quality (HD for newest movies)
-Big movie archive
-Regular updates
-Beautiful actresses (including Vivid Girls such as Jenna Jameson, Briana Banks, Brea Lynn, etc.)
-Good price (with the PU discount)
-Nice web design, stylish and glamorous
Cons: -Navigation is not easy, videos are only listed chronologically
-Too many problems with the scenes, sometimes it's a pain to watch one single scene)
-No download option, only streaming
-Search tools could be greatly improved
-Bonus content is non-existent, or at least I haven't been able to get it.
Bottom Line: I felt kind of obliged to write this review, since I wrote a previous one some years ago and the site has changed quite a lot since then. So I took advantage of the PU offer, and joined (it is not a big sacrifice, really :P)

And yes, the site has changed, and in most aspects it has improved: it offers the same old Vivid style movies (stylish, wel lit, glamorous, gorgeus big-titted girls...), in acceptable to good quality and with some improvements in the navigation and search options. Contrarily to what other users have said (probably referring to the old version of this site), the archive is quite big (I've calculated around 600 movies), with each movie splitted into scenes, all of them accesible individually.

Now, to the cons. In my experience, the worst thing about this site is the tremendous amount of time you waste trying to watch a single scene. Most of the time, the site charges up to a point, and then it stops. And I haven't found a way to avoid this, or to make the site work properly. It's really frustrating to search for a movie, and when you have it, not being able to watch it because the site won't load properly. And this happened to me a lot; almost all the time.

Another big fault for me is the limited ammount of search options the site offers: there is a search box where you can look for actresses and movie titles, but there is no alphabetical list of titles, there is a category filter but it's hard to understand and to use, and scene description is not clearly stated.

In summary, my experience with Vivid.com has been highly disappointing. I have been able to stream (not download, there is no download options) a bunch of scenes which, it's true, are not available elsewhere, but I've also lost a good deal of time clicking F5 and reinitializing my browser to try and access movies and scenes in the site. And that's just no way to enjoy porn.

I would say that those low ratings, in the range of 50s, are too harsh on a site that includes gorgeus girls and good movies, but I also wouldn't strongly recommend this site.

11-13-10  11:53am

Replies (7)
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Huge archive
-Updated regularly (a new video every 2/3 days; new pictures every other day)
-Gorgeus models (mostly Eastern European, I would say)
-Beatifully shot pics and videos
-In new videos you have different video qualities and formats
-Zip archive for picture sets
Cons: -Navigation and search options are minimal
-Yes, it's only g/g action, so it can get repetitive
-Some models appear under strange, unusual names
-Bonus content is minimal or non-existent
-Silent sex means less narrative or fantasy involved
-Almost no preview before joining the site (bad marketing strategy, in my opinion)
Bottom Line: I finally decided to join this site, which had been for a long time on my "to do" list, and I have to say that I am not dissapointed. Of course, you have to know what you'll get when you join, but I knew it, I was expecting it and I got just exactly that: all girl-girl, classy, mid-core (if you get what I mean) action.

The picture and video sets all have more or less the same style and structure: a very quick and unimportant segment were the girls interact and decide to get into action, and then a few minutes of licking, kissing, scissoring and some light fisting. The girls are generally very hot, mostly in a European, thin and athletic way.

From the technical point of view, newer video sets offer three different download options (HDV - 1280 x 720 @ 4Mbit; HDV - 852 x 480 @ 2Mbit and HDV - 448 x 256 @ 1Mbit); older sites have less options and poorer quality, as could be expected. Updates come quite regularly (one video every 2/3 days and a new picture set every other day or so), and most of them -although not all- are paired picture/video sets.

Now, let's get with the cons: the most important one, yes, is that there are only so many things girls can do to each other without getting too kinky or hardcore (and you won't find any of that kind of stuff here), and most of the girls don't speak English, so scenes tend to look a bit repetitive after a while. There are variations, of course (location, number of girls, positions), but it all has the same style and kinf of look to it.

The design of the site could also get some improvement. It's easy to navigate, but has too few search options. Models are only displayed alphabetically (more on that later) and the description of the scenes doesn't let you, for example, to look for all the sets involving foot fetish action (which is something that I, as a foot lover, would have liked to see).

About the model archive, it was very frustrating for me to see that many of the best known European models are listed here under different and completely unrelated names. For example, Eve Angel is Daphne; Blue Angel is Beatrice; Eufrat is Juliette; Sophie Moone is Sophie M. (well, that one was easy), etc. I don't know the reason for this, but it makes it very difficult to find those models, specially since there is no "alias" or "aka" index anywhere in the site.

Bottom line: I really like the site. It has its cons, but it is probably one of the best g/g sites you will find. Obviously, if you are looking for something more hardcore or with more variety, you will get dissapointed; but then again, why did you join a site called Sapphic Erotica if that's not what you are lookin for? :P

09-21-10  10:10am

Replies (2)
Visit Club Sandy

Club Sandy

Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Sandy is still hot
-Huge archive (1400+ videos) with some very hot models
-Good video quality in new sets
-zip file for pictures
-Updated regularly (a new set every 2 days)
-Included in the 21st Sextury pack
Cons: -Has lost much of its personal touch
-Some occasional download problems (common to all 21Sextury sites)
-Site design is poor (it was much better before they pushed all the sites together)
Bottom Line: I thought I should write a new review of this site, seeing that the last one I wrote was so long ago, and the site has changed quite a bit since then. For one thing, the site has lost a lot of the personal touch which made it different from other 21st Sextury sites. One of the things that I loved about this site was that once a month you got the chance to chat with Sandy herself; that's gone now, and there is also no bio or blog from Sandy, so it's really a weird "model-centered" site. The only thing that makes this site different from Pix and Video is that from time to time you get a site featuring Sandy, who, by the way, is still hot no matter what other users say :)

Don't get me wrong, this is a good site, just as Pix and Video or Lezcuties are good sites too; but it doesn't have the extras or bonus that you would expect from a site focused on one single model, specially considering that it did have those extras in the past.

Still, you get good content for your money, regular updates, good video quality, a huge archive with gorgeus models (quite a few sets from Sophie Moone, since her and Sandy used to work a lot together) so I think you won't complain if you get this site in the 21st Sextury combo. It's just, well, it could be better, and it HAS been better in the past...

09-04-10  03:50am

Replies (0)
Visit Hot Legs and Feet

Hot Legs and Feet

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Gorgeus European women
-Amazing foot fetish action (solo, g/g and some b/g)
-Really huge archive, updated every day (one day with a picture set, next day with the corresponding videos)
-Several video download options
-zip archives for pictures sets
-Part of the ddfprod network
Cons: -Best days of this site are long gone
-If bought indepentently it's quite pricy
-Some "new" sets are just re-editions of older ones
-Older sets have not been improved since they first appeared and have quite low quality
Bottom Line: Hot Legs and Feet continues to be my favorite foot fetish site, although I think that it's "golden days" are now over. I remember when I first joined, Sophie Moone was in her full splendor and making tons of videos for DDF; the same could be said about Eve Angel, Anetta Keys, Sandra Shine... Now most of those models are retired, working for 21st Sextury or in the US, and the new models that have appeared since then don't have the same sex appeal or charisma. Or maybe it's just me...

In any case, this site works very well for someone who is looking for foot fetish action: it has quite a lot of solo sets; many girl/girl action sets, and quite a few boy/girl sets. It is updated very regularly (three new sets a week, consisting on pictures and video) and in its new sets it offers different download options and qualities. Only good things can be said about directing, lighting, editing, etc. None knows how to capture the beauty of female feet in action like these guys.

My last consideration is a quite obvious one: this site is included in the DDF Productions network deal, so if you are interested, I would recommend joining the whole network for a bit more money, because you will get access to other good sites too.

09-03-10  05:30am

Replies (0)
Visit Squirt 4 Real

Squirt 4 Real

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Squirting looks real (well, as real as it gets)
-Easy navigation
-Acceptablee video quality
-Some g/g action, although most of it is solo
-Good site design
Cons: -No updates any more
-No live shows any more
-It's basically a solo site, although the title doesn't indicate so
-Jamie, the main model in the site, is ok, not extremely hot. But she really knows how to squirt
-Small archive (around 70 videos, no pics)
-Action gets repetitive and kind of forced after three or four videos
-Really pricy for the content it offers
Bottom Line: I got a membership to this site by accident, or by mistake: it was a pre-checked membership that I got when I joined Flashy Babes, without even noticing it. So I thought, now that I have it, let's try to enjoy it.

But the sad truth is, there isn't really that much to enjoy. The site features mainly just one girl (Jamie) who knows how to squirt enormous ammount of liquid, and sometimes makes scenes with other girls and tries to get them to squirt. And even if she gets it, it most of the time doesn't look erotic, but rather mechanic, as if she was squeezing them more than trying to make them cum.

A huge con for this site is that it isn't active any more: the last video update was added in 2008, and the last live show (which was probably one of the highlights for becoming a member) was in 2007, so there can be no hopes of new content being added any time soon.

It's funny that the site has a section on Female Ejaculation, which tries to be kind of scientific, with graphs and all. But it's not anything that you can't get for free elsewhere, and it's not really what you want to get in a porn site.

My bottom line: don't join this site. It may have been fun around 2007, when you got to see live squirting action, but now it's just no worth it.

08-28-10  05:07am

Replies (0)
Visit Pussyfoot Girls

Pussyfoot Girls

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Some very well known actresses, such as Cytherea, Katsumi
-Easy navigation, several search options
-Lots of bonus sites in the Filth Freaks network
-Acceptably sized archive (not huge, just big enough)
-Good price (PU discount), full access trial membership
Cons: -Not updating any more
-Video quality is quite low, even in the "high wmw" option
-Video scenes are splitted into 4-6 smaller videos, and there is no full scene download option
-All the content is taken from the (now extinct) Pussy Foot'n series
Bottom Line: If it wasn't for the 1$ trial membership, and considering the previous review by James4096, I never would have joined this site. But 1$ trial memberships are so tempting...

And the content of the site, as if could be guessed by its titled, is basically the scenes from the foot fetish series "Pussy Foot'n". Nothing more, and nothing less. Having watched most of those movies before, the site was quite dissapointing...

The cons are quite big, in fact: the quality of the videos is not great, there are no updates any more... The only thing that I really liked is the site navigation and search options: each scene is tagged, you can look for models by name, scene or chronologically... If it only had good content to go with that good site structure, it would be perfect.

When you join the site you also get access to quite a lot of other sites from the Filth Freaks network, for different niches and fetishes (big boobs, big butts, grannies...). However, none of those sites attracted me the slightest bit, and a lot of them aren't updating any more, just like Pussyfoot Girls.

All in all, my conclusion is similar to James's: this site is not really worth a whole month membership; maybe a trial suscription, to download the few scenes that are really hot, is enough for any foot fetishist. And for the rest, this site offers nothing of interest. The only really great thing about this site is its price.

08-25-10  02:19am

Replies (0)
Visit Euro Girls On Girls

Euro Girls On Girls

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good picture and video quality
-Different streaming and download options
-Good picture and video archive
-zip file for picture sets
-Gorgeus European models including Eve Angel, Blue Angel, Eufrat...
-Good lighting, directing, editing, etc.
-Included in the DDFProd deal, or accesible as an independent site
-Quite a few lesbian foot fetish sets
Cons: -Not all content is exclusive to this site (but all content is exclusive to DDFProd)
-Some sets are photos only: to access the video you have to join Sapphic Erotica and pay a different membership there
-Action can get a bit repetitive after a while, since there is no "plot" or dialogue in the scenes
Bottom Line: I have rejoined (once again) the DDF Productions network, and when I do so, I do mainly because of Hot Legs and Feet: the first site that I ever payed for, and probably my favorite one, ever. However, among the other sites that are included in the network, Euro Girls on Girls is, I would say, the best one and the one that is closest to my taste.

As the name indicates, it's a site devoted almost exclusively to lesbian action. The quality of pictures and videos is the usual in DDF, and for most of the sets you will find different download options (wmw, qt, mpg...) and streaming qualities. The girls are also the usuals in this network: cute European models, including personal favorites such as Blue Angel, Eve Angel or Eufrat.

The cons are quite small compared with the pros: for example, I don't like that marketing strategy in which they offer you a picture set (most of Nelly's sets, for instance), and when you try to watch the video you get a message saying: "This is a photo set cortesy of Sapphic Erotica, please join, etc.". It's quite frustrating, and although I may join Sapphic Erotica in the future, right now I am tempted to stay away because of this not so elegant way of advertising.

Also, the content of this site is not completely exclusive, although it is all DDF Prod stuff. Some sets are published simultaneously in other sites of the network. This may be a small nuisance because you may download the same set or video more than once from different sites.

The reason why I gave this site an 85 and not higher is because I find that, as an individual site, it is a bit pricy. On the other hand, as a part of the DDF Prod network, it is a great and welcome addition to the other sites and niches, even if it wasn't the reason you joined it in the first place.

08-13-10  03:49am

Replies (2)
Visit Flashy Babes

Flashy Babes

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 08-13-10  03:53am  (Update History)
Reason: Horrible customer service
Pros: -Very professional-looking site, with a personal touch
-Very artistic pictures
-Some really cute girls
-Around 480 video scenes and many more picture sets
-Full trial
Cons: -Very few search options
-No zip files for pictures
-Some models are just not that hot
-Extremely softcore content: solo scenes, sometimes not even nude scenes
-Most videos are backstage clips, which are really not that hot
Bottom Line: I have to say that I joined this site with a trial membership of just 1$ for 2 days, as an ex-member of Twistys. And it's a good thing that I did, because if I had paid the whole 14.95$ to join it, I would probably be very dissapointed right now (and most probably, my rating for this site would have been lower too).

In general, I would say that this site has more cons than pros: although the photography and video direction are good, and the clips and pics look classy enough, they are just too softcore for my taste, being all solo sets, and not even masturbation sets: just the girls posing and teasing, sometimes without even taking all their clothes off.

Also, the navigation of the site could use some improvement, by adding some search options or classifying the sets by category (posing, teasing, stripping, backstage, for example), or offering the girls in alfabethical order, as well as in order of preference and order of appearance.

Another major con for this site, as other reviewers have pointed out already, is that they don't offer .zip files for pictures. I am not a picture fan myself, but for a site that, like this one, seems to depend so much on pictures, it's a really big mistake.

The girls featured in this site are, generally speaking, quite regular, and most of them are complete strangers to me (the only exception being Sunny Leone, who in any case is not one of my favorites). Some girls are really cute; others are not. I feel as if the site was missing at least half a dozen extra-hot models (American or European) to make up for a complete catalogue: the famous ones, the cute unknown ones and the fillers.

All in all, I am not truly satisfied with this site: although the photographer and director does a good, professional job, I don't feel like this site excels at anything in particular. Only if you are into softcore (and I mean, really soft), you may enjoy the treats that this site has to offer.

Update: I have downgraded this site from 78 to 70 due to their horrible (and I mean abysmal) customer support. I joined with a trial membership, and cancelled it (three times!!!)during the first two days; however, I was charged for the whole next month. I have emailed them four or five times, and still no response. I am wondering if this is just a coincidence, or if it's a premeditated strategy to lure you with the trial membership and then charge you the whole month no matter what... Anyway, I would recommend staying away for this site unless you really, really don't mind paying for a one month membership.

08-06-10  07:20am

Replies (8)
Visit Twistys


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Amazing ammount of content: many more pictures than videos, but that's quite usual, isn't it...
-Good update rythm: two-three picture sets and two videos a day
-Really beautiful girls (mostly American big-titted actresses, but also some European cuties)
-Easy navigation and different search options
-Good picture and video quality, specially in recent sets
-No download limits
-Good pricing, considering the content they offer
-Full trial membership (I received a special 1$ discount for "old customers: best deal ever).
Cons: -Downloads are at times a bit slow
-Content may be too softcore for some viewers, specillay after a while (and the hardcore part of the site is really minimal)
-Not all content is exclusive
-Some company ads, not too annoying though
Bottom Line: I rejoined this site thanks to a trial membership offer that I received in my email, for being and "old customer": 1$ for three days, renewable at 14.95$ a month. Probably the best invested buck in my whole life.

The archive is huge. That's probably Twisty's most salient quality. Being one of internet's "classics", it has so much content (more picture sets than vids, but that's quite usual, isn't it) that you would need months to download and browse it all -specially considering that download speeds aren't always the best. The quality of the videos varies depending on their release date, newer videos being offered in three different qualities.

The models/actresses are mostly American girls with huge tits -a lot of them, fake-, but you will also find a handful of sets by some of our favorite European models, such as Sophie Moone, Eufrat, Eve Angel or Nella (here as Nellie Hunter). Most girls are absolutely stunning, so no complains there.

The only possible dissapointment about Twistys is that it is too softcore, or too regularly softcore: most sets and vids are solo masturbation sets, very beautifully lit, acted, filmed and edited. This is great, but it can get a little too repetitive once you've watched it a dozen times with a dozen different girls, and the bunch of lesbian or hardcore videos available are just not enough to balance this feeling.

But this is just to say something bad about a good site: good in ammount of content, in quality of pics and videos, in model selection and even in price, if you are lucky enough to get a discount (PU's offer or other one). It could be a good holiday idea, to get a Twistys one month membership and download as much as you can...

07-28-10  11:43am

Replies (7)
Visit Foot Factory

Foot Factory

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Clean and efficient navigation
-All exclusive content
-Classy, artistic pictures and videos
-Acceptable archive size (+300 videos, +3000 picture sets)
-Beautiful models (including Valentina Vaughn, Justine Joli or Dita von Teese, for example)
-Full trial membership
-Pictures are downloadable in .zip format
Cons: -Mostly solo, softcore content
-Very irregular updates
-Somewhat dark in style and lighting
-Videos with music (I hate that)
-Not a wide choice of formats and qualities for video download
Bottom Line: So, following my quest for new and exciting foot fetish sites, I joined this site, which I knew mostly because they released a couple of videos as movies in Hotmovies.com. To join, I used a "trial membership" option that appears as an "easter egg" if you try to surf away from their Join page: for 2.95, I got complete access to the site for three days. Great deal, I am really thankful after my extremely dissapointing experiences with other trial memberships recently.

As for the site itself, well, to enjoy it you have to know what you are going to get, and you have to like that kind of stuff: it's mainly artistic, classy, elegant, somewhat dark foot fetish solo/masturbation pictures and videos. It has an Andrew Blake ring to it, although without the BDSM.

Among the models who work(ed) for this site, you will find some of my personal favorites, such as Justine Joli or Valentina Vaughn, but also a lot of unknown actresses who are just ok. One thing that I hate is that most videos -not all- include a music soundtrack, which silences the moans and groans of the actresses. I really don't like that, it's a complete turn off for me...

On the technical side, the navigation is just good (you can only access the pics and videos in inverse chronological order, with no search options or categories) and the choice of video qualities and formats is minimal -inexistant for older sets. Another big "con" is the low rate of updates in this site: they come irregularly, mostly once every week, but sometimes every two weeks, or every three or four days...

All in all, I was dissapointed with the site, mainly because I am not that much into solo action, and because, although I can enjoy a softcore video once in a while, I prefer it not to be SO softcore. This site is clearly devoted to showing the beauty of the female body, and more precisely female feet, but I also expected it to show some hot f/f or even m/f action. Obviously Ed Fox is a great photographer and a talented artistic director, but it's just not exactly my taste.

07-27-10  02:44am

Replies (0)
Visit Footsie Babes

Footsie Babes

Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 07-23-10  02:56am  (Update History)
Reason: This is a new review, I don't know why it was catalogued as "expired review"...
Pros: -The archive is not huge, but big enough (248 scenes)
-Exclusive sets, mostly
-Gorgeus European models (including Sophie Moone, Blue Angel or Eve Angel)
-Excellent video quality and different download options
-Reasonable price: 19.95$ with the PU offer, and you also get this site in the 21st Sextury pack (which is probably the best option)
-Good artistic look in all the videos
-All-in-one zips for pictures
-Some variety in the type of sets: mostly solo and b/g sets, with some g/g
Cons: -Only 1 update a week
-No bonus content
-The style in the videos is elegant, but a little repetitive at times
-Some models do not look like they are enjoying themselves too much
Bottom Line: I was totally convinced that at some point I had made a review of this site, but apparently, I hadn't. So here I go. I was a member of this site some years ago, when it first opened and it worked as an individual site, and I am now a member again, thanks to the 21st Sextury pack offer. When it was just the one site, I remember that I used to get a little frustrated, because the updates were too slow (they used to "slice up" the sets through a whole week) and I didn't get any extra content. Now, with it being a part of this site-pack, it's easier to be patient and wait for the updates to come.

After visitting other few sites in this same niche, I think Footsie Babes is up there with Hot Legs and Feet and Foot Fetish Daily, as one of the top foot fetish sites available anywhere, probably in a close third place (HL&F being my absoluto favorite). It has classy and sexy models with beautiful feet, the quality of the videos is great, and the size of the archive is acceptable.

The bigger problem with this site, as with most 21st Sextury sites, is that it updates quite slowly (at least for my standards): just one update a week is not enough, and it can be really frustrating if you opt for a short membership and you don't like one or two of the last updates, for whatever reason.

And I have to say, that although it is difficult to say why, Footsiebabes tend to dissapoint me a little with their scenes. They have gorgeus models, they have good material, and yet, they tend not to hit the exact spot when dealing with foot worship, footjobs or foot fucking. I think the directors and editors should take a look at DDF and Kick Ass for inspiration on how to treat feet in a video, and also on how to set the appropriate mood for the scene... Anyway, I am well aware that this is just my personal taste, and other users may love the 21st Sextury way of doing foot fetish videos...

My bottom line, to sum up, is quite simple: I like this site, but I recommend getting access to it by getting the whole 21st Sextury pass, not as an individual site. If you are a foot fetish man like myself, you will enjoy it.

07-23-10  02:55am

Replies (2)
Visit Wicked Pictures

Wicked Pictures

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Gorgeous women
-Stylish and elegant movies
-Good archive size
-Most scenes are downloadable (contrarily to what some people, including myself, have said in the past)
-Very reasonable price, with the PU discount
-Easy to cancel
-Some moderately interesting extras (behind the scenes, Wicked Tube...)
-Movies directed by David Stanley (he is one of my favorite directors...)
Cons: -Site is really slow
-Search options could be improved
-Site navigation also could be much better
-All movies look a bit too much alike after a while (they do look great, just a little too similar)
-Not too much foot fetish centered content (a pity for foot fans like myself)
Bottom Line: So, I joined the site to take a peek, seeing that with the PU discount the price was really reasonable (although it was 9.95 for me, which is a little more than $9.95). And at first I was really dissapointed, because of the painfully slow pace at which the site charges. It's true that it has improved a little since: it comes and goes, but it always is too slow compared with other similar sites. It may be that they have too much traffic for their connection, or that the dozens of thumbnails that appear with each movie take too much time, I don'w know. It's really frustrating, that I do know.

On the plus side, Wicked Pictures is one of the best porn studios in the world: they have some of the hottests actresses (Jessica Drake, Jenna Jameson, Keri Sable...), and their movies always look great: classy, well lit, with a plot and characters... The only proble, for my taste, is that the sex scenes always look a bit too similar: the same positions, the same order, the same ooohs and aaaaahs...

Also, when I first joined this site some years ago, there was no download option (other users have said the same in their reviews). Now, you have the option of downloading almost every scene in DVD quality (although some scenes have broken links, like scene 3 of All About Keri, which I haven't been able to download). The download speed, however, is also another issue: it's also quite slow, and I have "lost" some downloads because the connection was broken before they finished.

All in all, and especially considering the low PU price, I think this site is really worh it, at least for a while. If they rearranged the site and solved those problems with download speeds, it would surely get to the lower 90s in my score.

07-12-10  04:12pm

Replies (0)
Visit Hot Movies

Hot Movies

Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Huge ammount of videos (and growing): literally thousands
-Several streaming options and qualities (from Low to Mega)
-Price is very reasonable (for streaming: 200 minutes for 19.95$, for example)
-Improved scene description and interface
-All kinds of niches and fetishes
-Includes movies ome of the best studios and directors (Vivid, New Sensations, Viv Thomas)
Cons: -Not all movies are available for streaming
-If you want to "rent" movies, it's much more expensive
-Older movies have worse video quality (and worse scene tagging and description)
-Sometimes (very, very few times) a movie won't stream as expected
-No pictures (that's not really a con for me, but it may be for some people)
Bottom Line: So, I just realized that my last review for Hot Movies "expired", so, since this is one of my favorite classics, I decided to write a new one. The fact that I am still a member of this site after more than two years should tell you that I am quite satisfied.

Basically, I think this is a site for movie streaming. You don't have pictures, and renting options are much more expensive. So you should accept the idea of watching porn online, and not "owning" it in your PC. If you can do that, this is the site for you. You have an enormous archive with tons of movies with many of the hottest actresses and from some of the best studios (Wicked Pictures being the most notable exception). And new movies are added daily (I am talking around 25 new movies a day, aprox.)

I really recommend this site, specially since it has no monthly rate: you can buy your streaming minutes and use them whenever you feel like it. Or even pay-per-view (an option I haven't used because it's more expensive). I only wouldn't recommend this site for people who want to download movies, or people who like pictures better than videos.

06-29-10  01:51am

Replies (3)
Visit Foot Fetish Daily

Foot Fetish Daily

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Medium-big size archive
-Good video quality (not great in older videos)
-Cute girls, some classics like Cytherea, Sunrise Adams or Jewel Valmont aka Ava Vincent.
-Easy navigation (by model, by type of action, by date...)
-Different styles and types of foot action (hardcore, lesbian, solo, etc.)
-Regular updates (they really do come daily)
Cons: -Very few download options
-Most models are just average, not ugly, not impressive
-A lot of the sets are solo action (Meet X, X self-sucking, X soles on glass, etc.)
-Best known actresses have very few sets or videos
-A bit high-priced (29.95$ a month) for this times of crisis.
Bottom Line: I was really hoping this to be a great, great site like Hot Legs and Feet (my all time foot fetish favorite, as some people at PU may know). And it wasn't. Foot Fetish Daily is not bad, but it's not great either. It offers a good number of pics and videos, with some really hot girls like Daisy Marie or Nicole Ray, for example, but you also get a huge amount of solo sets with anonymous models whose name, face and body you probably forget the next minute.

On the pro side, Foot Fetish Daily gets you access to at least a part of the Kick Ass Video archive (the ones who make Barefoot Confidential, the longest running and most awarded foot fetish video series, if I am not mistaken).

I don't see FFD as a long membership kind of site, even if it is true that it is updated daily. Unless, that is, that you like foot fetish solo videos, which are not my cup of tea: in that case, this may be the perfect site for you...

05-30-10  05:16am

Replies (2)
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network

Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -10 sites for the price of one (really good deal)
-Very hot models, including Sophie Moone, Eve Angel, Eufrat, Blue Angel...
-Different fetishes and niches: feet, blowjobs, teens, busty ladies...
-Good picture and video quality
-Huge archive
-Different download and streaming options
-Up to 3 updates daily
Cons: -Sometimes (very seldom) they reuse older material
-The main site doesn't "remember" the login details
-Some sets are pics-only
-Only two simultaneaous downloads (more if you are downloading from different sites within the network)
Bottom Line: As other reviewers have already stated, any "con" that we may find to this site-of-sites is nitpicking. The quality and quantity of the contents is one of the highest online; the girls are gorgeus and Denis de Francesco is a great photographer and director. Lighting of the sets is almost always perfect, just as make up, sound and picture. I only wish the models would "act" a little more and talked a little more, but them not being native English speakers, I guess that's difficult.

I don't think anyone who joins this site, and who liked DDFs previous work will be dissapointed. There is no trick, no limited access, no billing trap (that I know of). Just one year ago, I was happy to pay this same money to get access to just one site (hotlegsandfeet); know, I can also get access to nine other sites, and although some of them don't interest me at all, I do find occasionally some very nice sets that I would have missed if I was a member of just one site.

I see that 21st Sextury also offers now this kind of mega-pass: I may try it when my subscription to DDF expires, although I doubt that it will have the same outstanding level as this one...

02-24-10  07:40am

Replies (6)
Visit Eve Angel Official

Eve Angel Official

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The lovely Eve Angel
-Personal touch to the site (blog and contact with Eve Angel)
-High quality pics and videos
-Videos available for download in different qualities and formats
-Photos available in .zip
-Easy to navigate and nice appearance
Cons: -Some pics and videos are not exclusive
-The archive is not very big (yet)
-No sets with Sophie Moone (it's a pity she retired, I would really love to see a new set involving Eve & Sophie)
-Gets a bit repetitive after a while (but well, what solo site doesn't...)
Bottom Line: I agree with exotics4me that this is a very good site, in the line of other DDFProd sites. The design and structure of the site is simple, clear and welcoming, and Eve Angel is simply wonderful: beautiful, sexy and sweet. Also, another pro for me is that there are quite a few sets in which Eve shows and uses her feet in a sexual context, and I simply love that.

On the "cons" side, I find that the content of the archive is a bit limited, which is normal for a new site: it will get bigger with time and with the regular updates -which are, indeed, very regular-. I also find that, after watching quite a few of the videos, it ends up being a little repetitive, but this is also normal: every solo site, even if it tries to be varied in its content and sex niches, becomes a bit repetitive after a while.

All in all, I think Eve Angel Official is a great site, and it has the added value of having Eve herself really implicated in it. As what happened with SweetSophieMoone and other sites like that, my suggestion would be to join every now and then to see how the archive grows, more than a permanent membership.

In any case, I really hope that this site goes well, after Eve Angel's fiasco with her last "official" site, because she is really one of the most beautiful and sweet models around.

12-17-09  09:23am

Replies (0)
Visit Ashlynn Brooke

Ashlynn Brooke

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Ashlynn Brooke is hot
-Bonus access to other sites
-Complete and cheap trial access
-Downloadable videos
-Good quality
Cons: -Not a lot of variety in the sets
-Not exclusive content
-The archive is not huge
-Not much personalize content for the site
Bottom Line: Here is my advice: if you have a long weekend ahead in which you will have access to the internet and a lot of spare time, get the trial access to this site: in those three days, you will have time to view and download all the content of the site, and also take a peek at the bonus sites included in the offer. After those three days you will be able to decide if you want to stay or (most probably) cancel your membership.

Ashlynn Brooke is a really good looking young actress, and she really knows how to perform, but this site doesn't do her justice, and you will be able to find almost all the content in her Digital Sin / New Sensations videos.

08-01-09  03:48pm

Replies (0)
Visit Hypno Girls

Hypno Girls

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice hypnosis tricks
-Good acting from the girls (generally)
-High video quality
-Some extras
Cons: -Can't download videos
-Updated every now and then
-Some girls are just not hot
-Very poor design
-Tricks are always the same
-Some problems joining (now solved)
-A bit pricy for the content it offers
Bottom Line: I wanted to join this site for a long, long time, but for some technical reason I couldn't until just recently. Now that I am in, I see that the site has some pros, and a lot of cons: it's true that you probably won't find better hypnosis videos in the internet (which is kind of sad, really), but it is also true that you won't get many updates, and the fact that you cannot download the videos is a huge con, in my opinion.

My recommendation, if you really are into erotic hypnosis, is to join this site for just a month, see what there is, and cancel. If you really, really like it, you can come back in a year or something, to see what's new.

Also, a word to the wise: one month membership is 29.95; three months is 89.95, both recurring at the same price. If you use your calculator, you will see that you get absolutely no discount for long-term membership or loyalty. In fact, if you get the three month membership you will pay 10c more than if you get the 1 month recurring membership for 3 months! Isn't that kind of stupid?

03-15-09  04:24am

Replies (2)
Visit Open Air Pleasures

Open Air Pleasures

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Gorgeus models (Sophie Moone, Eve Angel, Jo, Sandy, Anetta Keys...)
-Good video and picture quality
-Different viewing and downloading options
-Acceptable -if not great- archive (around 120 sets)
-Bonus access to other sites if you are really patient
-Some (not much) bonus content
Cons: -Updates are added in small chunks, so you have to wait over a week to see the whole set
-Archive will grow slowly
-Some of the content is not exclusive (specially the sets with the most famous models)
-Limited trial access
Bottom Line: I am a member of this site thanks to a loyalty bonus given by Sweetsophiemoone. This site is quite good for those who like softcore, solo and girl-girl action, because that's what they will get here. The girls are gorgeus, the lighting and video quality is great, there are different downloading and streaming options...

In the cons side, just as the other new 21st Sextury sites, the slow speed of updates can make the site a bit boring after a while, because you have to wait a whole week to see a new set, and another week to be able to download it complete. Also, the price is a bit too high, and although you do receive bonus memberships to other 21st Sextury sites, you have to be really patient for that.

All in all, I would recommend this site to solo and softcore action lovers who like gorgeus European women and don't mind paying regularly for a long time in order to get access to the extra sites.

P.S. for foot lovers like me: there are quite a lot of barefoot models in here, but no foot action.

04-15-08  03:05am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 59 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.51 seconds.