| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
from rearadmiral:
Informative review! I have to admit that this is one of the few popular sites here that I haven't joined. Their confusing pricing scheme kept me away at first, but that's fixed now. So after reading positive reviews like your I think it might be time that I finally join.
|
09-03-12 05:05pm
|
Reply
2
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
from Monahan:
I have no argument at all with nadiencendia's review. However users need to be aware of the site's less than honest business practices.
I signed on to 21sextury on August 28, 2010 through its Zoliboy.com site. The deal back then was that the longer one stayed, the more sites were accessible until a subscriber was permitted access to all sites.
I got what I was promised until sometime in January, 2012 when the network split into two networks; 21sextury and 21sextreme. Because I was originally signed up through Zoliboy, I lost access to 21sextury because Zoliboy was now part of the new 21sextreme network.
Initially I was promised continued access to 21sextury but every month when the membership renewed, I was bounced off the 21sextury site and had to submit a trouble ticket for reinstatement. Then I was told that my original "lifetime" deal expired and that I would need to sign up separately with a new subscription to regain access to 21sextury.
Be warned. 21sextury is, indeed, a superb site for great content and production values, but if they decide to split the network again, all bets will be off and all promises will "expire."
I agree with the 93 score for content but give it the lowest permitted score of 50 for its business practices.
|
09-02-12 07:50pm
|
Reply
3
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
from TheSquirrel:
Great review. I agree with you, both about the pros and the cons, and for me, this place is one of the best.
|
09-02-12 04:49pm
|
Reply
4
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from Claypaws:
Obviously a valid point. But, speaking as someone who, as most PU members will know by now, finds little interest in video, I must say that Sophie Moon's videos are amongst very few that can sustain my interest. She has, or had, a performance style unique in my opinion, with a powerful camera presence that I have seen in nobody else. I am convinced that her on camera orgasms are genuine - I think those contractions are pretty well impossible to fake.
My only regret is that many of the early videos are available only as low quality MPEGs. I would willingly pay a membership to SSM alone if they had access to the video tapes and could remaster them.
I have had memberships to the network, though not in the last three years. Of all that I downloaded, Sophie Moon's videos are the only ones I still watch and hers and Mia Stone's pictures the only ones I view.
|
09-02-12 02:36pm
|
Reply
5
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from pat362:
I think that Sophie is more or less retired from porn now and sadly uses this site to promote the fact that she's still a pornstar when she does her escort tours. It's a wellknow fact that porn girls make a lot more money than your average escort. They are only 8 new scenes this year and 4 of those are solo while the other 4 are g/g.
I'm not judging her decision but I agree that no one should join 21sextury for new Sophie scenes. You will feel cheated if not robbed.
|
09-02-12 11:51am
|
Reply
6
|
Hot Movies
(1)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from Hotmovies:
Hello Nadi,
Glad you like our site.
We still offer the "1 minute free" for users when their minutes gets below a certain threshold.
This allows us to keep offering minutes to those that need it, but stop users from collecting thousands of unpaid minutes.
We had some issues with abuse where people were creating multiple accounts and storing up over 1,000 minutes in each.
If you ever need anything, let us know. We are listening.
Best Regards,
James
|
08-27-12 06:55am
|
Reply
7
|
Hot Movies
(1)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from hodayathink:
I noticed this too, and was hoping it was just a glitch on my end that would be fixed soon.
It was fun while it lasted, though. Now I've gotta make sure I use these last 100 minutes well.
|
08-27-12 04:18am
|
Reply
8
|
Streamate.com
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ace of aces:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
that seems to me that it`s the best way if i email them once more before i open up a new account. were youre favorites deleted as they reopened youre old account?
|
01-10-12 08:44am
|
Reply
9
|
Blue Angel Live
(1)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from Porndog:
Please see my review. I think we are being taken as suckers.
|
12-21-11 03:52am
|
Reply
10
|
DDF Network
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from careylowell:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
...sorry but I've been away from this site for many months and only today read your cts. When i re-do my review of the site I'll grant them a rating in the low 80s.
|
08-17-11 12:47pm
|
Reply
11
|
Streamate.com
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Thanks for the tip. It's not as slow as actually entering the room and you get the benefit of not being banned by a trigger-happy model but I find it has a extremely slow response time compared to other cam sites' similar functionality.
It's also worth stressing that this feature only seems to be available at Streamate.com and not at its various clones. Since most models actively promote their cammodels subdomain, this feature is likely lost by many users.
|
03-24-11 12:43pm
|
Reply
12
|
DDF Network
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from monty2222:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Yes, the Eve Smile & Brandy Smile and the two Eve Smile & Nikita sets are some of the best I've found so far.
I've just been through the Sophie Moone sets and I must say that it's a lot easier when a girl only has ~20 updates. Sophie has more than a 100 sets and it's a complete clusterfuck of pictures only sets, duplicates, foot fetish (which I don't care for) reposted at the other sites where you don't expect to find such content, low resolution sets at one site with remastered high resolution duplicates reposted later at another site so you download the poor set first and then discover the high quality set afterwards...
The Eve Angel sets looks to be a similar challenge, luckily I have a reasonably good memory so I usually notice if something looks a bit too familiar. :-)
|
03-24-11 12:57am
|
Reply
13
|
DDF Network
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from anyonebutme:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
That's what it is, a content provider named Fred, many sites purchase his works. DDF started buying content from him about a year ago, all the sets that end in "fa" such as:
http://ddfprod.com/gallery/www.1by-day.com/025fa/Megan
then 21Sextury just recently with their new Daily Sex Dose site are using content from the same provider.
|
03-23-11 10:51pm
|
Reply
14
|
DDF Network
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from monty2222:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Thanks for the recommendations, they are much appreciated. :-) I noticed something odd btw: Eve Smile, situated next to Eve Angel, ensnared me (something about the short hair, it's so rare in porn) and while checking whether she had content at other sites I found that her scene with Brandy Smile was also at 21sextury (or one shot at the same location in the same clothes), which surprises me I wasn't aware that they shared/licensed the same content.
|
03-23-11 02:17pm
|
Reply
15
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from RustyJ:
They've managed to hook me with their very reasonably priced full loyalty price bonus. Now I do not dare to break my subscription with their new subscription system and all, at least until I can figure it all out...
|
03-03-11 09:47am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from lawless:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Indeed, I don't watch porn to see tons of cocks ;)
|
03-01-11 09:13pm
|
Reply
17
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from RustyJ:
I noted the same. Could it be just another clone content site from another subscription package?
|
02-02-11 07:37am
|
Reply
18
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from Sandstone:
Heya Nadiencendia,
You have keen eyes to notice that :) It is, unfortunately, a minor bug caused by our constant upgrade work. Thanks to you we noticed it and we are working on to repair it.
Really sorry for the misleading issue. :)
|
02-02-11 07:03am
|
Reply
19
|
Nude Fight Club
(3)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
from mbaya:
I have tried a few similar sites and the only one that is at all worthwhile is kink's ultimatesurrender.com. This was a really good review by the way. I know how difficult it is to write up a site that you don't care for, especially if you are not really into the content either.
|
01-20-11 08:40am
|
Reply
20
|
Twistys
(6)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
from Shap:
Thanks for the Review nadiencendia :)
|
01-19-11 08:15am
|
Reply
21
|
Fucked Hard 18
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from squirrel:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Yes, it's a bit repetitive, but that's not really a negative at all. The girls, of course, are different. And the same-old scene and format is really what makes this so great -- you just don't see female bodies in all their curvy beauty like you see them here. Finally, I sure haven't seen much more satisfying "plain old sex" like you see here.
I gave it a 100 because there's just nothing really "negative" at all, and it is absolutely unique -- and good. You can download it all within one month's subscription, and it's well worth that cost to get this content in your hands. This is really me trying to wave my arms in the air and yell to everyone, "This is worth checking out!"
|
01-11-11 04:34pm
|
Reply
22
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Yep, that's happened to me quite frequently as well. I was about to download a new update but got nothing but a picture. Sadly, I can't reconsider my membership because I took it out long term some time ago and now will have to wait until my membership expires. I gave this net a good score in my review but it sure does have its occasional hiccups.
And you're right support is not very responsive.
|
01-04-11 09:17am
|
Reply
23
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tom22:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Yeah, and I always thought the huge majority would be those that prefer full body length shots. That's not to say there is never a time for a close-up, but geeezs you can't just part the camera at her butt-hole, which is what most sites do.
And they love shots from the floor looking up at almost a 90 degree angle of the girl. What's up with that? I wouldn't complain about it except that its so common. It's a lousy angle, but they love it and do it constantly.
Many of these sites that love this ultra close up crap would have 500% better camera work if they just put the camera on a tripod and never touched it throughout the entire scene. Honestly, I'd much prefer that to the constant and unnecessary movements, swatting of the camera, and too close-up all the time.
But if you want to see some good camera work, (not great, could still use some improvement) but some "good" camera work, checkout the Teen Mega World sites. The Russians have got the right idea on camera work. Good for them !!!
|
12-31-10 11:10am
|
Reply
24
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from Tom22:
You are exactly correct Nadiencendia. 21Sextury has slipped back into the old porn paradigm of a constant TOO-CLOSE camera. Marketers of porn have pretended that POV (so called Point-of-View) camera work is something new. It's not, its been one of the curses on porn from day-one.
Thankfully some porn sites are finally learning to keep the camera back so you can see the overall action. The Russian sites are leading the way and they are kicking-butt on all the old style American and Euro sites.
Shooting a porn scene is not rocket science, its just 1) get adequate lighting, 2) keep the camera steady 3) get proper focus and DISTANCE and angle so you can see the overall action. It's that simple, but they still manage to mess it up by trying to keep the camera stuck up the girl's butt.
Yes, a close-up is good sometimes, but it shouldn't be ALL the time. And they zoom the camera too fast, and constantly make unnecessary camera movements and generally swat the camera around like its a tennis racket. I don't know what they are thinking.
Hey, it took the porn industry 40 years to lean to turn the lights on. Honestly, go look at some old 'classic" porn and notice that about 90% of the scenes don't have adequate lighting. I guess it will take them another 40 years to figure out we would like to see the ENTIRE girl... not JUST her tits, not JUST her butt, not JUST her face.... LET ME SEE ALL OF HER PLEASE !!
Well, maybe they will figure it out someday, but my hopes are dimming, especially seeing 21Sextury fall back into the same old trap.
|
12-30-10 11:59am
|
Reply
25
|
Hypno Trick
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Ok, just a quick follow-up to let you know what the editor found.
She said ...
"We have a note on this listing that credit card joins are not available ... you can only join by their check system, Web Transaction Services, Inc. I was able to get to the check processor page, so it appears the join ability is still functioning."
"Unfortunately we don't have a working user/pass for the site so I can't see if there are any updates currently, but ... the last time we were able to get into the site (January, 2010), a note was made on the listing that content counts had not changed since 2007 even though dates were showing as current at that time."
She went on to explain that some sites will rotate content in and out, keeping their dates showing current but the counts won't change. Sometimes this is legit and they're actually rotating content and other times they just change dates to make content appear to be current when in fact content hasn't changed at all for long periods of time and the counts reflect that. There's no way of knowing which is the case with this site.
The note she mentions about no credit cards available whould show on the TBP listing page.
Sorry we couldn't offer any more solid info but that's all we could find out.
|
12-30-10 11:03am
|
