| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
LOL. This should have been my answer, with 50+ having a slight advantage!
|
03-12-13 02:08pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I remember getting the email from the guy and having to read it multiple times to make sure I wasn't confused. The worst thing is that I really liked the site (aside from the streaming-only) and gave it a high score based on content but I said in the review that potential members needed to be aware that it is streaming only. As I recall now, his beef wasn't that I told people it was streaming but that I said he was unclear whether it was streaming. He pointed to his Terms of Service which were VERY vague as proof that he made it clear to people that the site was streaming only. I don't think the TOS was clear at all, and even so, how many people read the TOS before joining a site?
But I am still convinced that regardless of what he said his issue was, that he was really mad that I probably killed 90% of his potential business from PU members by pointing out that there were no downloads. (The site was new and hadn't been reviewed by the TBP folks yet.)
|
03-09-13 04:26pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Ditto RB's comments. There is one site I really like with assholes in charge of the service function.
But apart from that, I will stay with a site that provides good support/webmaster interest and will drop a site after one month with a shitty webmaster when I have a need to contact him/her.
|
03-08-13 09:28am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from jberryl69:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Well seriously - it's not like we see each other in church on Sundays, so what is there to hide? Who else would you talk to like this? Maybe, just maybe your Doctor but then we don't cost anything do we?
|
03-02-13 01:44pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I had no idea, or noticed then forgot, that the user can change the icons of individual folders. In 7, I've found the collection of options (in "properties," of course), but even the transparent ones (there are a few) show that curving shortcut arrow. Still, it's a neat trick.
|
02-23-13 06:27am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I'm thinking of trying to cut my collection down a bit but it won't be a quick process. My attitude of 'save everything you can get' really no longer applies since storage is cheap, and I don't think this whole internet porn craze will be going away any time soon!
|
02-11-13 05:15pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Cybertoad:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
For you Budda there should have been who has and addition to their house to store harddrives LOL
|
02-10-13 10:32am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from jberryl69:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Actually RB - it wasn't the city that didn't have the money to keep them, but rather Art Model made some bad business decisions leading up to the move. Yes, it had to do with money, but Art was held accountable by the fans. Too bad - Art was an innovator and forward thinking owner but this particular move was rather short sighted in creating good will from the fans in Cleveland.
|
10-30-12 11:17am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from Cybertoad:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I still have copies going back to Dos 5.0 to Windows 7 pro and everything in between. Made it a deal to get them all just in case lol.
Seriously I did tech work and got most free . I have a set of dos 6.22
un-opened floppies with book. LOL
|
04-04-12 04:34pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Cybertoad:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I didn't put 2000 as and option but share you good taste in OS's.
2000 was a work horse. Sad that MS never caught on to how good it really was.
CT
|
04-02-12 02:32pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from otoh:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hmm - actually I agree with RB (er, not that should be a surprise!)
I generally prefer solo, no toys - au naturel is always better, more realistic. Occasionally I don't mind toys; and if it's girl-girl, then I think a bit more raunchy is better than some of the more insipid touchy-feely material.
|
03-30-12 12:23am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I was just watching a little of one his videos the other day. I skipped through looking for something remotely entertaining, possibly sexy, but just couldn't stand it.
Never mind that his first order of business is to deep throat the girl until she is red in the face and vomits all over herself--I'm assuming he requires them to eat something beforehand--but just the fact that they look absolutely miserable, in pain, and not completely consenting is both a turn-off and also pisses me off. Woe to the poor girl who physically fights back (hint: he doesn't let that stand in the way of his boner assault :-O ).
He doesn't edit everything out, or just repeats a cut from a different angle, and you get a taste of just how much of an asshole he is performance wise, unless you consider fuck-her-until-she-screams "professional."
|
03-06-12 10:39pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from littlejoe:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
last month i just about reached 250gb. i think i got down to 500mb
|
01-12-12 04:29pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, I agree here, and I'd probably throw a tantrum while I'm at it.
"Unavoidably" better mean the police have arrived at my doorstep just to "look around," but I tell them to come back when they have a search warrant. Like any responsible citizen I patiently wait for them to return--while wiping the hell out of my hard drives as fast as I can click my mouse. I can only hope a police officer thinking "I smell porn in these here parts" is not considered an exigent circumstance...though they'd probably have busted down my door a long time ago if it was. (Gee, am I paranoid or what?)
Knowing my luck they'd return with a warrant that doesn't include going through my computers--d'oh! : - (
|
11-13-10 05:08pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Your comment brings back memories of seeing 8mm films and low-grade projectors available by the hundreds at the back of most porn magazines. I remember wanting to order some but knowing that they'd be seized at the border. Remembering this makes me grateful for new technology.
|
11-07-10 04:13am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I did not realize you are nearly as much of a download whore as I am. 30 TB is a very respectable collection. It is good to know that someone else is trying to download all the decent porn the internet has to offer too, for backup purposes I am sure! Some day they world might thank people like us. You know, when the feminist groups take over and delete it all from the internet and and it is all lost!
On a serious note, do you have a method of organization that is effect as such a volume? That is one thing I have not be able to do yet.
|
07-26-10 05:34am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
30TB!!!!!!! This man may be more than a mere Buddhist, he may be the real Dalai Lama! All hail!
|
07-10-10 04:40pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from pat362:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
You are a cunning seducer but I'd recommend putting the seat down all the time for a better overall result. This way you won't lose as many points and this may save you from having to watch a couple of chick flicks.
|
07-09-10 06:55pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from slutty:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Ah, that would perhaps be better in this case ;)
|
07-08-10 10:25pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Of course not. : - )
|
07-04-10 07:27pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Sorry. I agree that paying for a limited access trial is nuts. I have done it where the charge is $1 or so just to see what's there, because the webmaster wouldn't make much money if the teaser is crap. But with prices like $9.95b for a limited access trial, they can keep their site.
|
06-14-10 08:24am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
It's a full trial, not a limited trial.
It's 4.95 Euro for the mandatory 3 day full access trial, and 19.95 Euro for each subsequent 30 days.
|
06-13-10 08:59pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
That would be me as well.
I let my fellow PUers' comments guide me whenever my libido is exercised by a site that is new to me but looks appealing.
The old reviews, when followed by new reviews that tell a different (better?) story tell me whether or not the webmaster really gives a shit about improving the site or is just interested in the revenue stream from porndogs who sign up without doing any research.
|
05-31-10 10:17am
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks, RB - I'll put those words (4:3) to the dealer!!!
|
05-09-10 09:30am
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, I think the girls look expensive enough already without being 'shopped until they look like something that a space agency might come up with in its spare time.
|
04-18-10 08:51am
|
