Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (65)  

Feedback:   All (895)  |   Reviews (31)  |   Comments (90)  |   Replies (774)

Other:   Replies Received (503)  |   Trust Ratings (63)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 898 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
1
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)

Anybody since 2011?

Curious if anybody's been on this site since the last comments/reviews. I see on their signup page that they've remastered old videos but would like to get some member input on what's what before I consider jumping in.

10-23-14  09:51pm

Replies (0)
Review
2
Visit Busty Brits

Busty Brits
(1)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + 130 models
+ Excellent download speeds - average 3.5+ mb/s without a download manager
+ Lower than usual cost to join
+ Streaming previews for video
+ Zip files for newer picture sets
Cons: - 1990s layout
- split updates
- No search engine
- Some video quality really poor
- Lackluster and repetitive picture sets
- No set update schedule
- Only one file type for video - wmv
- Links that open to no content
Bottom Line: I know this site's been around for years so I knew I'd be looking at a lot of old video and pictures. The earliest content appears to date back to 2003 and I can't say I remember some of the video and picture quality being that bad back then. The newest video is a typical 1280 x 720 @ 4000+ kbps, well-lit, and look pretty good. But the older stuff is 640 x 480 @ 700+ kbps - those specs are somewhat deceiving because a lot of the old files are dim and blurry. Picture quality? The biggest are 1500 pixels on the long side. Meh. Going back in time gives you a not unexpected drop in size. And I've never been a fan of picture sets that contain portions that look like they were shot with a rapid fire shutter. Six, seven or more shots of a crotch that look like the model moved maybe an inch? WHY?

"What? No search function?"
"Split updates in this day and age?"
I think I actually said that out loud to myself when I first started running through the site. No excuse for that in 2014. There's also no excuse for links that open to blank and/or incomplete picture sets. I hit at least a dozen.

The content here really didn't do much for me. Some of the women are only busty because they're seriously overweight, some aren't all that well endowed and some (only a few that I saw) are siliconed. When I first joined, I jumped around the site a bit, ignoring the 1990 look to it, and downloaded maybe two dozen videos and a few dozen pictures, then I all but forgot about it until I got the email today that said my subscription was ending. Anyway, I went back, hit all the models' thumbs to see what else I might want and ended up with just under 100 videos and a few hundreds pics. Unfortunately, I can see me deleting a lot of files later as I really check 'em out. I also see that I'm going to have to break out the video editor to try to fix some color and lighting issues, even on some of the newer video.

I'm giving this site a 65 only because they're mostly true to their niche and because it's relatively cheap to join. All in all I see it as just another site that's probably best left as a one-time join for lovers o' the bigguns.

10-07-14  08:22pm

Replies (0)
Reply
3
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Very timely. Just joined Busty Brits. Even at $20, I'm not real happy with the 1990 feel to the site. A single small thumbnail preview for videos, no search function... Not a good purchase.

09-09-14  01:16am

Reply
4
Visit Euro Pornstars

Euro Pornstars
(0)
Reply of jook's Comment

Jook - This is what's known as "taking one for the team". I think everybody's joined a clunker at least once and that's where PU comes into play. You've already commented on your experience, now it might be good to actually review it to help warn other "victims" about what they might expect.

09-02-14  07:38pm

Reply
5
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of anyonebutme's Reply

Gee... thanks for clarifying that for me.

08-26-14  02:13am

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Czech Casting immediately comes to mind. Their lack of zip files for their thousands of pictures is the only thing keeping me from joining the site.

08-24-14  01:15pm

Comment
7
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)

Well here's a first

I was going back over the list of my old reviews to see what was what with some old sites I'd signed up for. The old timers on here might remember the "exchange" I had with good ol' Matt so it wouldn't surprise them that I was chuckling a bit before I even clicked on the link for this one.

NO MONTHLY SIGNUPS? Is he serious? $49 for six months is the minimum. That's a money grab I've never seen before.

Disgusting.

08-20-14  08:15pm

Replies (2)
Reply
8
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

The only times I can remember that I've had access
blocked have been when I've gone over hidden bandwidth caps.


08-12-14  11:36pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes. But I'm decidedly biased on the subject.

08-08-14  01:16pm

Comment
10
Visit Creampie Angels

Creampie Angels
(0)

Why bother?

The action is hot, the creampies are not. Why bother advertising creampies when they're so blatantly fake? As much as I hate the pull-out-to-hurry-up-and-cum-on-her-face routine, this site would have been better off doing just that, using a different name.

07-19-14  11:28am

Replies (0)
Reply
11
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Forgot to add:
Leave topiary art to trees and bushes other than pubic.


07-15-14  03:44pm

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

The proper term is, "stupid looking".

07-15-14  12:38pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I think another way to put it is, do your older, low resolution videos look crappier on larger screens? And, what do you do with those files?

As much as I now go for the highest resolution files I can find, I come from what I like to call the VHS era. The resolutions weren't great back in the day but they were definitely watchable. I guess that's carried through to today for me. I've deleted very few videos over the years due to poor resolution. When I do play an early video and it doesn't look good full screen, I drop the player size 'til it looks decent enough to watch.


07-03-14  04:51pm

Reply
14
Visit Overdeveloped Amateurs

Overdeveloped Amateurs
(0)
Reply of nomas23's Review

I can see that absolutely nothing has changed here. You didn't mention it, but I can easily figure that those broken up videos are still in 1990 style resolution to go along with the 1990 website design.

That strange link you saw was another money grab from this greedy little site. Last I recall, you have to pay for each month of the archives you want to see.


06-21-14  05:46pm

Reply
15
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Reply

Definitely going to try that. Thanks!

05-31-14  10:10pm

Reply
16
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

I'm almost sorry you told me those were Bang Bros sites. I really wanted to check both of 'em out, but I refuse to deal with those crooks. Thanks for the heads up!

05-21-14  06:19pm

Reply
17
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

Hey Khan - Do you guys ever contact sites to point them to comments here? Like I said above, I wrote to these people and they never responded. Not a great first impression and maybe a harbinger of problems to come if I signed up, but I'm really curious about this lack of encryption.

05-21-14  02:59pm

Comment
18
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)

Same company that owns Dancing Bear

Stumbled onto this site and saw the same general layout as Dancing Bear. Clicked on the join link and - whaddaya know? No encryption. Do people really sign up for sites like this? It's risky enough putting in credit card information when there IS some security. My email to the company about the Dancing Bear site went unanswered, didn't bother with it again. It's a damn shame they have so much money that they don't need mine.

05-20-14  07:55pm

Replies (7)
Reply
19
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(1)
Reply of clark kent's Comment

I just noticed the price hike, too. Definitely a deal breaker!

05-17-14  07:43pm

Reply
20
Visit Newbie Nudes

Newbie Nudes
(0)
Reply of Khan's Comment

I was wondering when this was going to happen. Good call, Khan.

05-07-14  03:45pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

The only things they have in common are the checkbook and the American Express card.

05-04-14  09:15am

Comment
22
Visit Dancing Bear

Dancing Bear
(0)

No encryption?

Went to sign up and saw no evidence of encryption. It says 100% Secure Server & Confidential Transaction, but there's no https, no "lock symbol"...nothing. Asking for a credit card number without any security? NOT happening!

05-03-14  11:40am

Replies (1)
Reply
23
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

A very timely poll for me. Just today I was looking at a bunch of In the Crack clips and thinking, "I wish to hell they would stop with the high heels".
To me, they're another porn cliché that needs to die along with those idiotic looking angel wings. Gimme bare feet, please.


04-27-14  05:12pm

Reply
24
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of LPee23's Reply

Thanks for the feedback, LPee. It certainly does look like they've finally spiced things up a bit.

04-05-14  03:49pm

Comment
25
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)

Again - Looking for current or recent members

It's been just over a year since I last made this request, so (also again) I probably have my answer, but...
Can anyone tell me if the videos are still saving the skin for the end of the clip?

And, please... site reps? I want to hear from subscribers, not the people trying to sell their material.

03-17-14  09:55am

Replies (3)

Shown : 1-25 of 898 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.01 seconds.