Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : LPee23 (16)  

Feedback:   All (159)  |   Reviews (10)  |   Comments (11)  |   Replies (138)

Other:   Replies Received (58)  |   Trust Ratings (7)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 58 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A REPLY TO #8 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks. I'm actually enjoying my The Classic porn membership. They have an amazing mix of Euro and American stuff which is what I'm looking for.

02-09-15  05:52pm

Reply
2
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Jay G: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks for the clarification. I have no problems with watermarks if they're not distracting, but my experience with DRM & music has influenced my dislike of DRM. I was burnt badly & learned, often I paid and got no useful product, but I admit it was a few years ago, but why would I ever take that chance again?

02-01-15  06:44am

Reply
3
N/A REPLY TO #14 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

I guess that is part of the appeal but there are some thing in porn that I simply don't want to watch because I find them degrading to the women. Spitting, Slapping, Facials, pee are all things that I avoid because I find that it's a degrading act being perpetrated against the women and therefore a turn off for me. I don't judge them impartially because I'm unable to be impartial on those subjects.

I'm sure you view pee scenes with a very different eye than me and more power to you if you can find such scenes. They aren't that rare but they are still a fringe item that is getting much harder to find. At least new stuff.


01-27-15  06:41pm

Reply
4
N/A REPLY TO #12 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

The problem you seem to want to overlook is that pee is not actually water. It is waste material in the same vain that shit is except that urine's main component is still water and therefore ingesting it is unlikely to cause any ill effect but you don't see people drink their piss or play with it because instinctively we know it's not meant for consumption.

I think that is why having an open mind is not going to change any of what I wrote. In fact it's likely to have the opposite effect as you consider the implication of someone pissing on somebody else.
Mind you I get the feeling that you don't see it the same way as I do but that's alright.


01-26-15  06:23pm

Reply
5
N/A REPLY TO #10 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

So unless I'm reading you wrong than basically watersport sites have for the most part all had issues with CC processor. I could believe it because pee is and always was a less than defensible part of the porn industry which is why most producers over the years have avoided shooting it or at least they found loopholes to shoot it. Why do you think you saw so much squirting.

I know Brazzer had to remove most if not all of their P/P content or face a loss of cc processors but frankly I never really believed the reasons they offered because their stuff wasn't any worse than the stuff Kink was shooting at the same time and still does today. I think there may have been other factors which we may hear about one day.


01-25-15  05:28pm

Reply
6
N/A REPLY TO #8 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

The only thing I can think of that is now censored and not available (except maybe on illegal sites) is underage porn. I'm not talking about always illegal underage porn so much as now illegal porn. I believe the legal age for doing porn is some European Countries used to be 16 and there are a couple of under 18 teenagers who did porn. Their stuff is no longer available because the legal age changed over the years and their stuff became illegal to own when once upon a time it was legal.

01-25-15  10:35am

Reply
7
N/A REPLY TO #4 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

The two biggest stumbling blocks for what you are talking about are availability and money. Finding the original master for those older videos is going to be a really hard because they may no longer exist or they belong to too many different people that finding and dealing with all of them will be next to impossible. I mean there must be a digital versions of most if not all older videos somewhere on the net but quality is usually on the poor side. That's where the money stumbling block comes in to play. I mean the technology is likely already here but paying someone to clean up older videos is going to cost way more than you can ever hope to make back and sadly now that people are salivating over the arrival of 4K videos then I don't know how big the market for videos that will be significantly lower will really be. I know I'd join in a second but I think I'm now part of the minority in regard t older porn.

01-24-15  07:14am

Reply
8
N/A REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (LPee23's Reply)

It does, as long as the site's okay with that. I prefer IDM over Free Download Manager because it offers support (I had a problem with FDM that couldn't be resolved). One other thing I really like about IDM is that it allows me to download just about any streaming video. I download a lot of DIY videos from YouTube and it's handy to have them available for playback even if you don't have an internet connection.

01-17-15  06:58am

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Monahan: (LPee23's Reply)

Ditto what LPee23 said.

11-24-14  02:26pm

Reply
10
N/A REPLY TO #6 from jberryl69: (LPee23's Reply)

Just a Wikipedia piece so it's hard to say how accurate it is but it's the best I could do under the circumstances. If I were ascribing percentages in porn, I'd say that Asian would have a higher percentage while African Americans probably less.

08-28-14  05:40am

Reply
11
N/A REPLY TO #3 from jberryl69: (LPee23's Reply)

Sorry LPee - The percentages in the US are so miniscule apparently since this is what the information I pulled was for. Sure you're not splitting hairs here?

08-27-14  10:03am

Reply
12
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Monahan: (LPee23's Reply)

What's a floppy? Are you talking about my schlong after about 2 minutes or so of serious boinking?

Seriously, the last floppies that were truly floppies were the old 5-1/4" deals. The 3-1/2 devices were far better because they weren't really "floppy." I still have some photos on the good old 5-1/4" guys just because I can't find any way to transfer them to a flash drive or anything else.


07-26-14  02:15pm

Reply
13
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Cybertoad: (LPee23's Reply)

Id love to read it cool

07-24-14  10:56am

Reply
14
N/A REPLY TO #9 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

I think it's great when sites remaster their older stuff because it gives newer members the chance to see those videos but a site should only use 30% remastered content as new updates and that's only if they update multiple times per week. Otherwise remastered content should bea bonus above truly new stuff.

The other important thing should be that older content should never be sold as HD if the site had to crop the older video to a small size so that they can actually make it HD.


07-22-14  02:03pm

Reply
15
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Cybertoad: (LPee23's Reply)

My review of their site recently was very hard due to what I viewed as mismanaged older content.

07-22-14  09:12am

Reply
16
N/A REPLY TO #7 from jberryl69: (LPee23's Reply)

With regard to the subject of 'older material', DFF would not be the only studio that has older material. But I would think it has to do with one's desire for specific older material that one desires. If you follow a retired performers work and want to collect it, you're going to have to suffer crappy video quality. (Think one of the more famous porn movies - Deep Throat.)

I once asked Jonni Darkko if he would redo any of his older work - He seriously doubted it due to lack of time & the cost constraints.

There is nothing amiss when a producer's catalog includes poor quality video, & while I'd love it remastered, better to have it available than not. Besides, it is content that already exists and has no continuing expense except the device on which it's stored. But then, isn't that one of the issues facing the end user own concerns with space in dealing with a collection?

I look at it like going to a library and finding an out of print book and then complaining that it's on the library's shelves because of the condition of the book.


07-22-14  06:36am

Reply
17
N/A REPLY TO #8 from jberryl69: (LPee23's Reply)

lol - I knew it really wasn't a trick question, it just turned into one. But look at the conflict of 1 & 2 - how can it be bad if you make more money with that strategy? One would be remiss if a survey of customers isn't done first.

I once worked for an trust attorney who's price for a trust was constantly keeping us in the weeds. My suggestion was to raise the price by 50% and if we lost 50% of the business (which was not going to happen - we lost 1/3 of the number we normally did) we'd break even but work less. In the actual case we got more money for less work. Now I know it's not the same thing exactly but if you putting a strategy in place (and true it might not work unless you tried it) to make more money let the suckers leave.

Netflix did this when they broke out their DVD & Streaming business into the same cost for each as the cost for both was. They lost my business but obviously their business has grown.


06-11-14  04:36pm

Reply
18
N/A REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (LPee23's Reply)

Ditto LPee23's comments.

Make 'em obvious ads so they cannot be confused as content links and I'm perfectly fine with them.

Don't overdo it like Naughty America has done. I did not renew my NA membership because the entire log in page was all ads and no content.


05-06-14  09:34am

Reply
19
N/A REPLY TO #6 from graymane: (LPee23's Reply)

I have to commend you, LPee ......It certainly can't be said you don't go all-out defending your stance on matters about which you comment...... in this case your recent poll entry.
This is a welcome discovery. Keep up the good work!


04-20-14  03:40am

Reply
20
N/A REPLY TO #12 from oldfizzywig: (LPee23's Reply)

OMG - that would be such a wild turn on.
In the cup and then a drink, and then maybe let my use my tongue to "wipe" round their pussy. What a truely erotic thought.


12-17-13  06:52am

Reply
21
N/A REPLY TO #5 from graymane: (LPee23's Reply)

Since this is a subject that obviously interest you, and I apologize for bringing it up so late in the poll, but I'm reminded of a number of stories of people lost, having exhausted their water supply, on a desert or otherwise dry terrain, who saved their own lives by drinking their own urine.

12-15-13  09:00pm

Reply
22
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(11)
REPLY TO #3 from biker: (LPee23's Reply)

I know I have downloaded scenes I already own from previous subscriptions, but I'm doing a little better at giving them file names that will help me find them and placing them in folders that separate them into categories. Those old shoots stand up, both models and photography.

04-06-14  09:31am

Reply
23
Visit Abbey Brooks

Abbey Brooks
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review from graymane:

Eloquent piece of work, LPee.
Ain't much on the likes Abby Brooks' stuff on themes of this nature has to offer me, my friend ..... but I clearly see an important, yet
cautious reminder, and very important eye-opener for those who do.

Superbly written review, LPee. You do us proud.


12-06-14  02:41am

Reply
24
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from RagingBuddhist: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks for the feedback, LPee. It certainly does look like they've finally spiced things up a bit.

04-05-14  03:49pm

Reply
25
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
REPLY TO #4 from rearadmiral: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks for the info. I'll definitely be rejoining soon.

04-27-14  07:00am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 58 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.43 seconds.