Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : LPee23 (22)  

Feedback:   All (205)  |   Reviews (13)  |   Comments (13)  |   Replies (179)

Other:   Replies Received (72)  |   Trust Ratings (7)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 72 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A REPLY TO #3 from Pyrenees: (LPee23's Reply)

I feel ya. I didnt have much to say on that poll question. I personally tend to re-watch my favorite scenes over and over. Like the Matador 18 holes scene with 4 girls and two guys. Or the Without Limits scene where Sandra Iron gets he fine bung plugged. But just like everyone else I like to mix it up too and look for something new and exciting. I love finding new Sheena Shaw scenes. August Ames has potential but needs a LOT of good directing or she reverts to dead fish mode.

08-03-15  11:25am

Reply
2
N/A REPLY TO #1 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

Why? What is the appeal in being able to count every pubic hair one a time? I like a pussy just the next guy but unless I have a real woman in front of me than I don't need to see as much detail as you seem to want from the ones on my computer screen.

05-19-15  07:05pm

Reply
3
N/A REPLY TO #7 from rearadmiral: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks for answering these questions. I'll definitely be doing this to speed things up.

05-16-15  11:18am

Reply
4
N/A REPLY TO #4 from rearadmiral: (LPee23's Reply)

Interesting point. By system drive I take it you mean my internal hard drive where the OS is? So if I point the download to an external drive (not SSD) that might speed things up?

05-13-15  04:14pm

Reply
5
N/A REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (LPee23's Reply)

My HP experience is a bit different. I had always had a Dell custom built and was careful to get as much performance as possible for my money. A few years ago I realized that my computer was getting a bit old and that I just didn't need the horsepower that I once did so I just went to Costco and bought an HP off the shelf. It's probably fine for what I really, really need, but I still find it slow. Part of that was a glitch that appeared early on. It had 10GB of RAM but then the whole computer stopped working. A tech couldn't explain why, but it worked fine if one of the sticks of RAM was removed. It made no difference which one was removed. There were two 4GB sticks and one 2GB stick so the 2GB was removed. But I find now that it doesn't like multi-tasking. If I'm downloading something using IDM then the computer is pretty much useless for anything else. Maybe IDM is a huge resource hog. And given the age of the computer I'd expect the USB slots to be at least 2.0 but the way they transfer data I'm guessing that they're 0.05! Sloooow!

Next time I'm likely going to have one built by a local shop. I've developed a relationship with this place because to send my HP for warranty work requires shipping it to some place faaaaar away and waiting for a month. I can pay and get it fixed in a day. But that means that warranty I paid for is money pissed away.

But I'm sure a lot of this is because I should have done more homework before buying...


05-12-15  02:09pm

Reply
6
N/A REPLY TO #8 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks. I'm actually enjoying my The Classic porn membership. They have an amazing mix of Euro and American stuff which is what I'm looking for.

02-09-15  05:52pm

Reply
7
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Jay G: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks for the clarification. I have no problems with watermarks if they're not distracting, but my experience with DRM & music has influenced my dislike of DRM. I was burnt badly & learned, often I paid and got no useful product, but I admit it was a few years ago, but why would I ever take that chance again?

02-01-15  06:44am

Reply
8
N/A REPLY TO #14 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

I guess that is part of the appeal but there are some thing in porn that I simply don't want to watch because I find them degrading to the women. Spitting, Slapping, Facials, pee are all things that I avoid because I find that it's a degrading act being perpetrated against the women and therefore a turn off for me. I don't judge them impartially because I'm unable to be impartial on those subjects.

I'm sure you view pee scenes with a very different eye than me and more power to you if you can find such scenes. They aren't that rare but they are still a fringe item that is getting much harder to find. At least new stuff.


01-27-15  06:41pm

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #12 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

The problem you seem to want to overlook is that pee is not actually water. It is waste material in the same vain that shit is except that urine's main component is still water and therefore ingesting it is unlikely to cause any ill effect but you don't see people drink their piss or play with it because instinctively we know it's not meant for consumption.

I think that is why having an open mind is not going to change any of what I wrote. In fact it's likely to have the opposite effect as you consider the implication of someone pissing on somebody else.
Mind you I get the feeling that you don't see it the same way as I do but that's alright.


01-26-15  06:23pm

Reply
10
N/A REPLY TO #10 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

So unless I'm reading you wrong than basically watersport sites have for the most part all had issues with CC processor. I could believe it because pee is and always was a less than defensible part of the porn industry which is why most producers over the years have avoided shooting it or at least they found loopholes to shoot it. Why do you think you saw so much squirting.

I know Brazzer had to remove most if not all of their P/P content or face a loss of cc processors but frankly I never really believed the reasons they offered because their stuff wasn't any worse than the stuff Kink was shooting at the same time and still does today. I think there may have been other factors which we may hear about one day.


01-25-15  05:28pm

Reply
11
N/A REPLY TO #8 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

The only thing I can think of that is now censored and not available (except maybe on illegal sites) is underage porn. I'm not talking about always illegal underage porn so much as now illegal porn. I believe the legal age for doing porn is some European Countries used to be 16 and there are a couple of under 18 teenagers who did porn. Their stuff is no longer available because the legal age changed over the years and their stuff became illegal to own when once upon a time it was legal.

01-25-15  10:35am

Reply
12
N/A REPLY TO #4 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

The two biggest stumbling blocks for what you are talking about are availability and money. Finding the original master for those older videos is going to be a really hard because they may no longer exist or they belong to too many different people that finding and dealing with all of them will be next to impossible. I mean there must be a digital versions of most if not all older videos somewhere on the net but quality is usually on the poor side. That's where the money stumbling block comes in to play. I mean the technology is likely already here but paying someone to clean up older videos is going to cost way more than you can ever hope to make back and sadly now that people are salivating over the arrival of 4K videos then I don't know how big the market for videos that will be significantly lower will really be. I know I'd join in a second but I think I'm now part of the minority in regard t older porn.

01-24-15  07:14am

Reply
13
N/A REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (LPee23's Reply)

It does, as long as the site's okay with that. I prefer IDM over Free Download Manager because it offers support (I had a problem with FDM that couldn't be resolved). One other thing I really like about IDM is that it allows me to download just about any streaming video. I download a lot of DIY videos from YouTube and it's handy to have them available for playback even if you don't have an internet connection.

01-17-15  06:58am

Reply
14
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Monahan: (LPee23's Reply)

Ditto what LPee23 said.

11-24-14  02:26pm

Reply
15
N/A REPLY TO #6 from jberryl69: (LPee23's Reply)

Just a Wikipedia piece so it's hard to say how accurate it is but it's the best I could do under the circumstances. If I were ascribing percentages in porn, I'd say that Asian would have a higher percentage while African Americans probably less.

08-28-14  05:40am

Reply
16
N/A REPLY TO #3 from jberryl69: (LPee23's Reply)

Sorry LPee - The percentages in the US are so miniscule apparently since this is what the information I pulled was for. Sure you're not splitting hairs here?

08-27-14  10:03am

Reply
17
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Monahan: (LPee23's Reply)

What's a floppy? Are you talking about my schlong after about 2 minutes or so of serious boinking?

Seriously, the last floppies that were truly floppies were the old 5-1/4" deals. The 3-1/2 devices were far better because they weren't really "floppy." I still have some photos on the good old 5-1/4" guys just because I can't find any way to transfer them to a flash drive or anything else.


07-26-14  02:15pm

Reply
18
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Cybertoad: (LPee23's Reply)

Id love to read it cool

07-24-14  10:56am

Reply
19
N/A REPLY TO #9 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

I think it's great when sites remaster their older stuff because it gives newer members the chance to see those videos but a site should only use 30% remastered content as new updates and that's only if they update multiple times per week. Otherwise remastered content should bea bonus above truly new stuff.

The other important thing should be that older content should never be sold as HD if the site had to crop the older video to a small size so that they can actually make it HD.


07-22-14  02:03pm

Reply
20
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Cybertoad: (LPee23's Reply)

My review of their site recently was very hard due to what I viewed as mismanaged older content.

07-22-14  09:12am

Reply
21
N/A REPLY TO #7 from jberryl69: (LPee23's Reply)

With regard to the subject of 'older material', DFF would not be the only studio that has older material. But I would think it has to do with one's desire for specific older material that one desires. If you follow a retired performers work and want to collect it, you're going to have to suffer crappy video quality. (Think one of the more famous porn movies - Deep Throat.)

I once asked Jonni Darkko if he would redo any of his older work - He seriously doubted it due to lack of time & the cost constraints.

There is nothing amiss when a producer's catalog includes poor quality video, & while I'd love it remastered, better to have it available than not. Besides, it is content that already exists and has no continuing expense except the device on which it's stored. But then, isn't that one of the issues facing the end user own concerns with space in dealing with a collection?

I look at it like going to a library and finding an out of print book and then complaining that it's on the library's shelves because of the condition of the book.


07-22-14  06:36am

Reply
22
N/A REPLY TO #8 from jberryl69: (LPee23's Reply)

lol - I knew it really wasn't a trick question, it just turned into one. But look at the conflict of 1 & 2 - how can it be bad if you make more money with that strategy? One would be remiss if a survey of customers isn't done first.

I once worked for an trust attorney who's price for a trust was constantly keeping us in the weeds. My suggestion was to raise the price by 50% and if we lost 50% of the business (which was not going to happen - we lost 1/3 of the number we normally did) we'd break even but work less. In the actual case we got more money for less work. Now I know it's not the same thing exactly but if you putting a strategy in place (and true it might not work unless you tried it) to make more money let the suckers leave.

Netflix did this when they broke out their DVD & Streaming business into the same cost for each as the cost for both was. They lost my business but obviously their business has grown.


06-11-14  04:36pm

Reply
23
N/A REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (LPee23's Reply)

Ditto LPee23's comments.

Make 'em obvious ads so they cannot be confused as content links and I'm perfectly fine with them.

Don't overdo it like Naughty America has done. I did not renew my NA membership because the entire log in page was all ads and no content.


05-06-14  09:34am

Reply
24
N/A REPLY TO #6 from graymane: (LPee23's Reply)

I have to commend you, LPee ......It certainly can't be said you don't go all-out defending your stance on matters about which you comment...... in this case your recent poll entry.
This is a welcome discovery. Keep up the good work!


04-20-14  03:40am

Reply
25
N/A REPLY TO #12 from oldfizzywig: (LPee23's Reply)

OMG - that would be such a wild turn on.
In the cup and then a drink, and then maybe let my use my tongue to "wipe" round their pussy. What a truely erotic thought.


12-17-13  06:52am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 72 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.64 seconds.