Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : LPee23 (20)  

Feedback:   All (173)  |   Reviews (12)  |   Comments (11)  |   Replies (150)

Other:   Replies Received (60)  |   Trust Ratings (7)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 60 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Visit 18 Magazine

18 Magazine
Reply of LPee23's Review from tangub:

This brings back memories, I remember joining 18Magazine what must be something like 10 years ago when it was just a small stand alone site with about 18 models, I think I did get a couple of bonus solo model sites with it too though. Looks like some great old content in this network for photo collectors.

I'll have to try and get around to joining because there are a couple of models there whose content I would like to collect namely Ariel Rebel and Katie Fey (Jenya D at Metart) so thanks for reminding me about this network. Only drawback though is the $40 price tag.

03-30-15  03:37pm

Visit Met Art

Met Art
REPLY TO #1 from lk2fireone: (LPee23's Reply)

I've been a member of Metart at different times for the last 10 years or more.
I can't say I've seen every photo set or video they have posted.
But I never came across a peeing scene.

My guess is that the person who told you about the peeing scenes was talking about Grigori Galitsin, who contributed to Metart in its early days.

Galitsin did make some videos featuring peeing, masturbation, lesbian sex, but that content was posted on his own site, not on Metart.
And the Galitsin photo sets that were posted on Metart (which were strictly softcore), were removed from Metart, after Galitsin ran into legal problems with Russia.

03-22-15  01:59pm

Visit Simon Scans

Simon Scans
REPLY TO #2 from MargulisAZ: (LPee23's Reply)

yep they are back up there now

03-03-15  07:13pm

Visit Brazzers

REPLY TO #6 from Pyrenees: (LPee23's Reply)

Its a simple story really Lisa Ann got paid to do a PSP scene but when it was over she told her fans she was terribly sore from the experience. VISA was already hesitant over the whole "Anti-Woman" nature of James Dean scenes including PSP. So Brazzers pulled 99.9% of the scenes (All of PSP) and about 70 other scenes of a similar nature. What they did not realize was how badly this would impact their fan base. It took several years for them to recover and they lost many fans forever over the fiasco. You see a lot of people dont download they just assume they can stream a scene forever. It was quite a shock to loose so much content. PSP was arguably always their top site. Now you have to get PSP scenes in torrent form. Unless you know someone personally. If someone has all the PSP scenes (Not in torrent form) post here and let us know lol.

03-01-15  12:10am

Visit Brazzers

REPLY TO #5 from Khan: (LPee23's Reply)

Just a FYI ... The PM to Pyrenees doesn't work because his account is still in a pending status. Which is only to say he hasn't got around to activating it yet. We'll hope he gets around to that shortly as it's nice to have someone new submitting.

02-28-15  06:53pm

Visit Brazzers

REPLY TO #3 from Pyrenees: (LPee23's Reply)

Well I will tell you two things. #1 Some of the PSP scenes are still on Brazzers website (About 30 of them on different sites). You can recognize them by the male actor, the situations and how there is no screen shot of the shoot (As if to hide where it comes from). #2 I have every PSP scene and they are not that great (With the exception of the Lisa Ann shoot, you know the whole reason VISA told them to pull the plug. That one is golden). I agree with you that people should let it go. But there is profit to be made why not sell each scene for $5 each under a different provider (Adult DvD Empire VOD) and make a crap ton of money and make their clients happy.

02-28-15  05:28pm

Visit Brazzers

REPLY TO #1 from Pyrenees: (LPee23's Reply)

I am glad others see the light =)

02-28-15  01:12pm

Visit Czech Casting

Czech Casting
REPLY TO #1 from Jay G: (LPee23's Reply)

My mistake, glad you pointed it out.

02-19-15  04:47pm

N/A REPLY TO #8 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks. I'm actually enjoying my The Classic porn membership. They have an amazing mix of Euro and American stuff which is what I'm looking for.

02-09-15  05:52pm

Visit Lady Sonia

Lady Sonia
Reply of LPee23's Comment from RagingBuddhist:

"I am not interested in ANY explicit content at all myself..."

Yeah, we all know it's a business, but getting it thrown in your face like that... nice.

02-07-15  04:51pm

Visit Brazzers

REPLY TO #2 from EverNight: (LPee23's Reply)

Sure here are 2 examples:

Jennifer White "DP for cheating Whore" and Diamond Foxxx "Big Cock for a Homewrecking Lesbian".

They stand out a bit because they'll be the ones with no preview picture.

02-01-15  03:05pm

N/A REPLY TO #8 from Jay G: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks for the clarification. I have no problems with watermarks if they're not distracting, but my experience with DRM & music has influenced my dislike of DRM. I was burnt badly & learned, often I paid and got no useful product, but I admit it was a few years ago, but why would I ever take that chance again?

02-01-15  06:44am

N/A REPLY TO #14 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

I guess that is part of the appeal but there are some thing in porn that I simply don't want to watch because I find them degrading to the women. Spitting, Slapping, Facials, pee are all things that I avoid because I find that it's a degrading act being perpetrated against the women and therefore a turn off for me. I don't judge them impartially because I'm unable to be impartial on those subjects.

I'm sure you view pee scenes with a very different eye than me and more power to you if you can find such scenes. They aren't that rare but they are still a fringe item that is getting much harder to find. At least new stuff.

01-27-15  06:41pm

N/A REPLY TO #12 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

The problem you seem to want to overlook is that pee is not actually water. It is waste material in the same vain that shit is except that urine's main component is still water and therefore ingesting it is unlikely to cause any ill effect but you don't see people drink their piss or play with it because instinctively we know it's not meant for consumption.

I think that is why having an open mind is not going to change any of what I wrote. In fact it's likely to have the opposite effect as you consider the implication of someone pissing on somebody else.
Mind you I get the feeling that you don't see it the same way as I do but that's alright.

01-26-15  06:23pm

N/A REPLY TO #10 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

So unless I'm reading you wrong than basically watersport sites have for the most part all had issues with CC processor. I could believe it because pee is and always was a less than defensible part of the porn industry which is why most producers over the years have avoided shooting it or at least they found loopholes to shoot it. Why do you think you saw so much squirting.

I know Brazzer had to remove most if not all of their P/P content or face a loss of cc processors but frankly I never really believed the reasons they offered because their stuff wasn't any worse than the stuff Kink was shooting at the same time and still does today. I think there may have been other factors which we may hear about one day.

01-25-15  05:28pm

N/A REPLY TO #8 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

The only thing I can think of that is now censored and not available (except maybe on illegal sites) is underage porn. I'm not talking about always illegal underage porn so much as now illegal porn. I believe the legal age for doing porn is some European Countries used to be 16 and there are a couple of under 18 teenagers who did porn. Their stuff is no longer available because the legal age changed over the years and their stuff became illegal to own when once upon a time it was legal.

01-25-15  10:35am

N/A REPLY TO #4 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

The two biggest stumbling blocks for what you are talking about are availability and money. Finding the original master for those older videos is going to be a really hard because they may no longer exist or they belong to too many different people that finding and dealing with all of them will be next to impossible. I mean there must be a digital versions of most if not all older videos somewhere on the net but quality is usually on the poor side. That's where the money stumbling block comes in to play. I mean the technology is likely already here but paying someone to clean up older videos is going to cost way more than you can ever hope to make back and sadly now that people are salivating over the arrival of 4K videos then I don't know how big the market for videos that will be significantly lower will really be. I know I'd join in a second but I think I'm now part of the minority in regard t older porn.

01-24-15  07:14am

Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
Reply of LPee23's Comment from Drooler:

I also noticed the old Teenrotica content showing up on MC Nudes. They've been doing this since August 2014.

Peeing isn't what I'm into, but the image dimensions are larger, which is good since the TR 2000px max size of yore is actually a problem with the newer higher resolution monitors when you want to zoom in on something special, be it a smile, a nice backside, or, for some, a shaft of gold.

01-22-15  02:11pm

N/A REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (LPee23's Reply)

It does, as long as the site's okay with that. I prefer IDM over Free Download Manager because it offers support (I had a problem with FDM that couldn't be resolved). One other thing I really like about IDM is that it allows me to download just about any streaming video. I download a lot of DIY videos from YouTube and it's handy to have them available for playback even if you don't have an internet connection.

01-17-15  06:58am

Visit Twistys Network

Twistys Network
REPLY TO #1 from Wittyguy: (LPee23's Reply)

I think I'm a bit limited in my response in that my subscription just ended. I know they used to have more content (especially the old stuff) and I think that is now hidden in an "upgrade" feature. I didn't upgrade so I can't say for sure what comes in that package. However, even if I'm right, unless you're concerned about way old content (7 years or longer) then you're probably not affected.

01-10-15  02:00pm

Visit Abbey Brooks

Abbey Brooks
Reply of LPee23's Review from graymane:

Eloquent piece of work, LPee.
Ain't much on the likes Abby Brooks' stuff on themes of this nature has to offer me, my friend ..... but I clearly see an important, yet
cautious reminder, and very important eye-opener for those who do.

Superbly written review, LPee. You do us proud.

12-06-14  02:41am

N/A REPLY TO #5 from Monahan: (LPee23's Reply)

Ditto what LPee23 said.

11-24-14  02:26pm

Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
REPLY TO #7 from rearadmiral: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks for that. I've watched a few already and they don't seem to any less graphic than before.

11-02-14  01:16pm

Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
REPLY TO #5 from rearadmiral: (LPee23's Reply)

I did. And I joined immediately to download what I wanted. I wonder if the videos are edited differently now.

11-02-14  12:11pm

Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
Reply of LPee23's Comment from pat362:

I don't know if you have more info than me but as far as I know. The total number of scenes will remain the same. The same thing that is happening to HGB happened to bound gangbang. As far as I know those scenes are still there. I have not idea what the new sites content will look like but I'll be a lot happier if there is less slapping, chocking a spitting in the new scenes. I think getting a woman to perform in a gang bang is already a difficult task. Asking her to be treated like crap is so much harder.

11-02-14  11:03am

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 60 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.34 seconds.