Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : shroom (4)  

Feedback:   All (10)  |   Reviews (2)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (6)

Other:   Replies Received (12)  |   Trust Ratings (11)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-6 of 6  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(0)
Reply of Joymii's Reply

Nice to hear from the company :)

As for the connectivity, I checked today and your "updates" page shows now properly (I mean at a very decent speed).
Think this article sums up very well the situation: http://arstechnica.com/information-techn...-break-online-video/

As for the quality, the fact that I couldn't have a proper peek at your recent updates wasn't helping I presume.
You seem to have very decent looking models recently :)
I don't really have favorites. Though I must say I used to love Michael Sandberg's vids.
You should bring him back (as it looks like he's not making anymore videos) and let him shoot a longer feature with the models he used to work with on a regular basis.

Let me "somehow" disagree with the "one vid per week".
Now that I can really look around, it's: 3 for July, 2 for June and 3 for May which isn't exactly 1 a week (you used to have 4/5 per month couple years ago).

Thanks for your answer! I'll probably join back when I have more free time to spend on watching lovely models :)


08-03-13  10:21am

Reply
2
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

Yes, you're right (about your opinion) : it has merit even though I don't share it at all, and exactly for the reasons you're expressing ;)

I think the less make-up there is the better it is. I usually avoid Met-Art because of the generic quality it brings : they're on quantity side instead of the quality one.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that M-A is bad, but it really has nothing special.

That's what I like about Femjoy, that "Girl Next Door" feeling you're speaking about.
And more specifically, the artistic side they bring rather than the erotic one.

If I come back here, that's because they know how to picture nude girls without using artificial elements like make-up, toys...
And watching at the videos, I can clearly see that they enjoy being nude in front of the camera.

But indeed that's also a personal point of view, to each his/her hown :)


08-12-09  02:39am

Reply
3
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

Well, it's 19,95$/mo (or 99,95$/yr) if you come from PU/TBP. And that's a pretty good deal if you like HA.

Now if you hit the "Join" button directly from HA, then the monthly price is... 39,95$ (and 150$ for a year). I wouldn't consider joining HA at this price.


12-08-08  04:27am

Reply
4
Visit Querro

Querro
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

I was the one who asked that site to be listed here.
It was on my subscribe list, mostly because of its Femjoy look'n feel and because I had some hopes for their vids.

I can't write a proper review right now, but it's an average site, at least for me. I'd rate it 65/70. Not that it's bad, but there's nothing outstanding here.
Too much Photoshop on some pics.
Not enough vids and they're not that good, too amateurish.
It's a one year old site, with a regular update (a vid or a pics' set) once every two days (usually). So don't expect a lot of content.

In the end, that's just another softcore site.


10-05-10  04:25pm

Reply
5
Visit The Life Erotic

The Life Erotic
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

You're talking about Nikita getting nude in Prague ?
So far, that's the only set showing public nudity I've seen and that's clearly not the focus of this site.
But you can find many pictures taken outdoor.


06-15-10  05:30pm

Reply
6
Visit Zemani

Zemani
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Review

Zemani is quite an average site in my opinion and I share the feeling of the reviewer.

The best thing about it is the models. A lot of them are really cute, have a natural feeling and most of them aren't pornly-shaved : it's nice to see a bit of pubic hair from time to time ;)

The biggest downside is the pictures' quality. They really need to improve in that department : a lot of weird sets & many blurry pictures (and no, not an artist blur).
Don't join for the videos either : you'll easily forget them after seeing them.

70/100


08-12-09  02:15am


Shown : 1-6 of 6  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.57 seconds.