Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Zemani

Zemani (0)

Drooler (220) 06-17-09  01:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Daily updates ... but only from June this year
+144 Slavic models; quite a few never seen before, and some of them are darlins’!
+All exclusive material
+Mix of indoor and outdoor shoots
+236 galleries (avg. 126 pix each)
+Pics at 800px. 1200px, and 3-4000px
+All three pic sizes available under each photo thumbnail for individual pic saving
+All three pic sizes are zipped and linked on each page of each gallery
+Good visitor’s preview with demos of those pic sizes, a face shot of each model, and a “calendar” of updates you’ll want to familiarize yourself with before making that “buy” decision
+Good, consistent organization of content within models and galleries
Cons: -A fine mess of a model index. If there’s any organization here, damned if I know how.
-A few models are too low in body mass index, and a few others are easy on the eyelids.
-A few photosets are 2 from one shoot
-In case you were wondering, it has not updated every day since 2006. Scan those dates carefully. (The year 2006, btw, will take very little time!)
-50 videos, which might not suffice for those who crave photos in motion
-All vids are only in avi -- the gold standard for nude art, no? But they’re not “HD.” Specs of the sample I suffered through: 656x496, bitrate of 1744. Kind of amateurishly done, too.
-Vid audio is teckno muzik – the gold standard again!
-Occasionally has one or more of the problems typical of soft nude sites: excessive shadows, blurriness, lack of light, and models being made to be anti-photogenically “not really there.”
-Downloads kind of slow at around 280 – 340 kbps or so, but that means you can grab a beer! (hic)
Bottom Line: Pro or con, your call: Lots of models have only one gallery up, at least so far.

Not sure who Zemani is, if anyone. Have seen theories that, if it’s related to “Zeman,” it’s either Spanish, from “Zamora,” or Czech, meaning “small landowner.”

Maybe it’s a line of haute couture? Whatever.

There’s no “Master of Nude Art Zemani” here that I’ve been able to lay my finger on. Fact is, this site shows the work of various photographers and, as one might predict, variations on satisfaction are guaranteed.

Some of the girls seem very amateurish in both attitude and looks, so what you get are nude photos of average girls looking pretty ordinary.

Generally, though, I’d say I’m pretty OK with this site. Found some new material of Vika H, Lena, Rudi, Lolli, Jasmine, Jozel, Hannasya, Lenusya, Alena, and Alsa. Those are their names here. At MetArt, MetModels, etc., they’re nymed otherwise, of course, as is typical for Russian models.

But what have we here?? Lika, Mara, Evzha, Vita A, and Allana, who’s the cutest, jail-baitiest-lookin’ honey I think I’ve ever seen! Now mind you, I like ‘em skinny if they look healthy and have a nicely formed orb ‘round back. Anyhow, those are some of my never-before-seen choice babes. With so many amateurs, some are bound to be winners.

Well, I didn’t think I could possibly find another site in the soft nude genre, but here it is. And this one’s off to a good start with the now daily updates and its considerable “back” catalogue (yuk-yuk).

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


GCode (101) Content comparable to Met-art style photography as on the softer side of things? AKA a lot of sealed lips?
06-17-09  05:47pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - GCode :

Yes. Sealed. Or maybe hanging open a bit in spots. But no pink. No fingers reaching in.
06-17-09  05:51pm

Reply To Message


Denner (235) You cannot cover it all in one review, so just this about the videos (again):
It does not look too well here (your cons), but what about video-style:
Sexy, art, boring (you mention amateurish)...
What about videos of photoshoots (think most of us are not happy with those..)

But anyway - thanks for a swell review and a fine info about this new site - and some of the models here are WAUW....

06-21-09  03:39am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #3 - Denner :

I also looked at their recent vid of "Nirvana." She's sexy and lets you know, but the quality is lacking. Even if she weren't bathed in excessive back light at a window, it still would be strain to enjoy it. It just looks kind of crappy.

You know how it is when the cover page of a video looks delicious, but then you get to the real thing and it's a letdown.

There's a site that I've discovered and looked into that might not even be listed yet, and you might want to check it out: www.teenmodels.com. The pics are all exclusive material -- very toy and somewhat lez -- but it also has vids of the models -- mostly European. In addition, in the "Naughty" section, it's got hardcore vids of a lot of American girls and I can't say I've seen those vids before. See they've got one of Faye Reagan, doin' it!

But those vids are cut into pieces (Part 1, Part 2, etc.). You have to search and assemble. (There's always some stupid problem, eh?)

06-21-09  04:35am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #4 - Drooler :

Every cloud has a silver lining - and, man - I see two here..
Just ran through that www.teenmodels.com - never heard of it/seen it before, but it sure looks promissing - that'll be the first "silver lining"... I guess.

Still I have to try Zemani - too, those models has to get in my archives - photos and/or videos.

Thanks, Drooler for those tips/infos here - maybe summer has finally arrived in the little old kingdom of Denmark - at least at this fellow users pc.

06-21-09  05:56am

Reply To Message


shroom (4) Zemani is quite an average site in my opinion and I share the feeling of the reviewer.

The best thing about it is the models. A lot of them are really cute, have a natural feeling and most of them aren't pornly-shaved : it's nice to see a bit of pubic hair from time to time ;)

The biggest downside is the pictures' quality. They really need to improve in that department : a lot of weird sets & many blurry pictures (and no, not an artist blur).
Don't join for the videos either : you'll easily forget them after seeing them.


08-12-09  02:15am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) This site is very much like a junior Met-art. Zemani has some very yummy models, but one problem is that when you find a yummy model here, she often will only have 1 or 2 photosets, so you are left hungry for more. Site started back in late 2006, and I'm glad they are adding the updates at a much faster rate now.
09-08-09  11:39am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.