Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (368)  

Feedback:   All (1921)  |   Reviews (152)  |   Comments (125)  |   Replies (1644)

Other:   Replies Received (1057)  |   Trust Ratings (71)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 51-75 of 1644 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
Reply of Jay G's Comment

I'm not 100% sure but I think the lower price is for Woodman Casting X and if you pay the higher price you get Wake Up 'n Fuck too. WUNF is worth the membership fee. It isn't considered a stand-alone site here so there is no way to add a review, but it is a great site. Let me know if you want more information on WUNF.

03-06-15  07:44am

N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

I don't trust tour pages that won't let me see what they have to offer. If they have a great site why not let me see it? Unless the site gets rave reviews I won't join a site that won't even let me see what models they have before kicking me to their join page.

03-06-15  07:42am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have to confess that I have no idea what this is...

02-21-15  05:44am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nope. Not really sure why either. One of my favorite models is Maryjane Johnson. I could look at pics and videos of her all day long. But those of her when she was pregnant do nothing for me. Maybe it's the 'protector' gene in me that comes out and displaces the 'pervert' gene when I see a pregnant woman.

02-18-15  02:24pm

Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
Reply of pilotguy's Comment

It always baffles me why a site like this has to stoop to such shady practices. As you've probably read in other comments you aren't the first PU member to be burned by BB. I got burned too - twice. I do still join the site but I treat it like a minefield as one errant click of your mouse and you end up with additional charges. BB has some excellent porn so it makes me wonder what they hope to gain by pissing of customers.

Just a warning - don't click on any links in any promotional emails you get from them. If they have your credit card information - surprise! - you just joined. The sender for their emails that I get is "Support." Support, my ass...

02-13-15  01:01pm

Visit I Worship Anal

I Worship Anal
Reply of bumbinky05's Comment

Thanks for posting the warning. This is a site that I would have considered joining but I'll definitely stay away knowing what you went through.

02-13-15  12:57pm

Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
Reply of Triple's Reply

It's still ticket based. There is a 'free' section, but it's older stuff.

02-12-15  03:21pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Most times I've encountered them there was an option to turn them off. Otherwise, I'm no fan of them.

02-12-15  03:20pm

Visit Pornstar Network

Pornstar Network
Reply of standard's Review

I had joined this site a while back when joining through TBP gave you the upgrade for free. That free upgrade is no longer offered. What I didn't realize was how useless the PSN membership is without that upgrade. I was planning to rejoin soon thinking that it wouldn't be too bad, but after reading your review I think I'll reconsider that. You just saved me some money and frustration. Thanks!

02-10-15  06:08pm

Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
Reply of Scotchfan's Reply

Thanks for weighing in on this thread. You make some valid points that will be useful for anyone else considering a membership here.

Towards the end of my one-month membership I realized that I needed to think about the site differently from a traditional membership-based site. I really did need to be more selective, but that isn't a bad thing. The next time I join (and there will be a next time with a three-month membership) I'll go in knowing that I need to approach things differently.

One point you mention that didn't occur to me but really needs to be highlighted is the sheer number of updates available here. It may have been me who contrasted LP with Kink. if I did it was more about the type of porn rather than the frequency of uploads, but you're right: this site adds a lot. And what they upload isn't cheap to make so buyers should expect to pay more.

I've always made the point that I'm willing to pay for porn because that means that more porn will be produced. The LP model is a clear example of that.

I'd agree that even with the confusing business model, the quantity of some unique and amazing porn makes this a best-in-class site. Admittedly this is a small class, but LP rules it.

02-10-15  06:05pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Thanks to TBP and PU I am usually able to join sites that I know I'll like and will be high quality. So once I join I will usually download everything that I want within a week.

02-08-15  05:20am

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
Reply of greg909's Reply

No. The individual photos come in at 1600x1065. To get the higher resolution you have to download the zipped set.

02-07-15  12:21pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I have to plead ignorance on this one. At a minimum, I download 1080x720 but in some cases that still looks like crap. I suspect that the dimensions are just one piece of the puzzle and that bitrate is a big part of it too.

Coincidentally, I think this an apt use of Justice Potter Stewart's comment about porn: I can't define it, but I know it when I see it.

02-07-15  05:29am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I look for quality and good reviews. My porn tastes are broad enough that I can be happy with a wide selection of sites.

02-04-15  05:46pm

N/A Reply of pornwatcher's Poll

It seems that so much of porn these days seems to skip over the woman's pleasure. But if we're permitted some editorial licence, my favorite oral to watch is a man or woman going down on a woman who is on all fours. Add some rimming in and I can watch that for hours...

02-03-15  05:30am

Visit Digital Playground

Digital Playground
Reply of host2626's Reply

I agree. That's ALWAYS a deal-breaker for me too. The only reason I joined was based on stingerxxx's comment that if you have Internet Download Manager the site streams in HTTP so you can capture that. Without that knowledge I would never have joined the site.

I hope I haven't broken any of the PU rules by revealing that.

02-03-15  05:27am

Visit Passion HD

Passion HD
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

I always read the TBP reviews but a disadvantage that they have (and I'm sure that this is the same of any review site, of any product) is that they aren't long-term customers. I rely on the TBP members who spend a longer time at the site over multiple memberships to find the real weaknesses at a site. Take download limits, for example. I don't fault the TBP reviewers for not finding a limit (provided that it isn't really low) because as a reviewer they're less likely to use the site as a real customer. If it's a snowy weekend and that new site I joined has a 100GB limit then I'll find it and report it. A reviewer, who is a more casual site user, would likely not find a 100GB limit.

I don't think that the TBP reviews are less objective than the user-based ones. They're likely more objective. But as a commercial review site they just don't have the time to spend on a site that a PU member has.

As for not flagging that scenes aren't exclusive, I really can't fault them for that either. Some of the PU regulars are encyclopedias of porn and I rely on those members for some of that information.

01-31-15  04:58am

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I have done so (or at least I think I have). Legal Porno claims to have a code embedded in each download that they can trace if the video ends up on a tube site. That doesn't bother me at all. If it helps stem piracy then go for it.

01-31-15  04:50am

Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
Reply of Pele's Reply

Thanks for taking the time to add your comments. I really like this site but their business model is certainly unusual. The porn they offer is certainly unlike anything else on the internet (that I've seen, and I'm an active buyer).

Thanks for noting that with the three-month membership there is an option to buy tickets at a discounted price. Another commenter figured out that the three-month option is the best deal but your information makes it clear that this is definitely the best way to go. I'll likely rejoin in six months or so, and when I do I'll follow the excellent advice I've been given here.

Welcome to Pornusers. This is the best site I've found for reviews and user-based participation. The staff here are excellent and the members offer a wealth of information. I hope you stay around and continue to contribute.

01-31-15  04:47am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Not at all. In most cases I wouldn't know anyway.

01-29-15  02:52pm

N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

I agree. Well said.

01-28-15  03:04pm

Visit VideoBox

Reply of mike11w's Reply

You and I are roughly the same age and for me the golden age of porn was from maybe 1993 to 2000. A lot of the reasons for that are personal and specific in that prior to 1993 porn videos were very hard to get where I lived thanks to draconian laws. But it became available in the early 1990s as porn started to move to gonzo. Gonzo then was a lot more fun to watch then the plot-based stuff of the 1970s and 80s. Those were the days when John Stagliano and Joey Silvera were creating and defining what would become modern porn. I do wish the quality was better, but I'll always be happy with a site that allows me to rebuild the porn video collection from my early days.

(In a way it's like music I guess. I grew up in the 1970s and most of the music I listen to is from that era. I'm not sure I could name five modern, popular bands.)

01-27-15  05:25am

N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

Going under the knife is the only potential reason that I would stop collecting NEW material from a star. It would never stop me from collecting and watching pre-surgery scenes though. And this isn't a hard-and-fast rule for me either. One of my favorite stars is Aubrey Addams and I continued to collect and watch her scenes after she got some (entirely unneeded) modifications. But those add-ons weren't garish and didn't hurt her overall look, except for a diminishment for guys like me who prefer small breasts.

One example of a model I used to actively seek out was Teagan Presley. Her meteoric rise in the business was entirely predictable given her looks and attitude. But then she took it to the next level and modified her looks substantially to join the ranks of models who do that and then seem to achieve a notoriety rather than fame. I don't collect new Teagan scenes, but the old ones will have to be pried from my cold, dead hands.

01-27-15  05:17am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I agree with all of the above. The only additional comment I can make is that I'm grateful for TBP/PU.

01-27-15  05:08am

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

For me, getting stuff is just as important as having it.

01-24-15  10:36am

Shown : 51-75 of 1644 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.15 seconds.