| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Comment
I haven't been a member at these sites for a while, but when I was I found the number of anal scenes was pretty good. I'm a big fan of anal and I'd have noticed if it was rare. Not all the models do anal, of course, but those who do seem to do a lot. Someone with a current membership may be able to give you more specifics. I'm not a big fan of multiples, but there are those too.
|
05-13-13 03:46am
|
Reply
27
|
Class Blowjob
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
It looks fixed now, and thanks for posting this comment because that looks like a pretty good site.
|
05-09-13 05:12pm
|
Reply
28
|
The Training Of O
(2)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Excellent review!
I'm a fan of this site too. While I'm a big fan of the Day 1 auditioning, what I don't like is that finding Day 2 through 4 can be a bit of a chore. They might call Day 1 "Seven Whore Roundup" and then the remaining days are named after the model they chose on Day 1. That's a bit of a issue for me.
Like you also, I wish there was some option to mix-and-match some Kink stuff with one membership. (Actually, you can sort of do that with the addition of the Kink Channel with Videobox, but the file resolutions are lower on VB than you can get on kink.)
|
05-09-13 05:08pm
|
Reply
29
|
Nubile Films
(1)
|
Reply of
The Captain's Reply
Thanks for jumping in and answering that. I would have guessed that there was no connection since the sites are so different and have different parent companies, but that occurs elsewhere too. The cross-sell on sign-up (not pre-checked) is for Nubiles.net so I thought that there might be some connection.
Your site is excellent and I appreciate you stopping in to answer the question. I know you can't please everyone, but a little more anal and some facials would be just about perfect!
|
05-09-13 05:01pm
|
Reply
30
|
Nubile Films
(1)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for the support!
|
05-09-13 04:57pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
Mmmmm... glasses...
|
05-07-13 05:26pm
|
Reply
32
|
Babes Network.com
(2)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I don't have a DL cap - yet. But I could at least tolerate one that allowed me to download as much as I wanted outside peak hours. That actually makes some sense.
|
05-05-13 10:35am
|
Reply
33
|
Gag Factor
(3)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
That's too bad, but it seems that studio websites are usually poorly done anyway so this isn't a big surprise.
|
05-05-13 10:34am
|
Reply
34
|
Gag Factor
(3)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
I sure hope someone answers and confirms that they have been upgrading the video. I was a member a couple of years ago and a lot of the quality was crap. I'd take a new membership pretty quick if someone could answer your question in the affirmative.
|
04-30-13 06:04pm
|
Reply
35
|
21Sextury.com
(11)
|
Reply of
TheSquirrel's Reply
I must be living under a rock since I didn't know there was a third "21" site. I'd never heard of 21 Naturals before. If it is as good as the other two I'll definitely have to give it a try.
|
04-30-13 06:00pm
|
Reply
36
|
21Sextury.com
(11)
|
Reply of
Jent's Comment
TheSquirrel is right: the pricing structure is just like a normal site now though you can build up credits when you're a member. They used to have a unique and frustrating membership, but that's gone. I joined both 21Sextury and 21Sextreme for the first time a couple of months ago and they are among the best sites I've joined. Highly recommended!
|
04-30-13 05:59pm
|
Reply
37
|
Nude In SF
(1)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
According to your comment it was almost exactly four years ago, and I think you are 100% accurate in your assessment: nothing has changed since then. (Except that it is technically twice the price now because they shortened the membership from two weeks to one, but that really isn't a big deal because there is very little here and a determined member with a normal internet connection could download everything they wanted in a couple of hours.)
I really, really, really wish that there were more sites with good public nudity in American (or Canadian or Western European cities) but I realize that the current legal climate probably prevents this. Not to sound like a shill, but if you do like public nudity, the best I've seen is Teasers VOD.
|
04-30-13 05:54pm
|
Reply
38
|
Babes Network.com
(2)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
Great review, and based in large part on it I'm adding this to my list of favourites and will probably join soon. Like you, this isn't exactly my usual kind of site, but for a different reason. I prefer harder porn than this, but after taking a membership to X-Art a while ago I realized that I really did like this softer stuff too. And I'm glad to hear that I'll recognize a lot of the models!
I hope the download manager issue was temporary. I like a lot of Manwin sites and I sure hope they don't start blocking managers on other sites.
|
04-30-13 05:49pm
|
Reply
39
|
Val Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I'm more of a video collector and these sites tended to favour photos. I've kept some of the videos and they were probably substandard resolution even five years ago. One of these days I'll take the plunge and join a couple of solo sites again.
|
04-29-13 05:37pm
|
Reply
40
|
Bikini Riot
(1)
|
Reply of
luv lickn clit's Comment
I've been interested in this site for a while but the preview does seem to show a lot of 'enhanced' models as you point out. I'd certainly appreciate a full review when you can get to it.
|
04-29-13 05:35pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Barefoot is my preference, but I don't mind footwear either - as long as it makes sense.
|
04-29-13 05:33pm
|
Reply
42
|
Val Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I've always wondered about that too, and can only conclude that it has to be the model's choice. But it seems to me that once a model gets into this business she might as well go all the way.
My biggest beef with these solo 'teen' models is that they are almost always poorly done. I'll admit it has been a while since I joined one, but the picture and video quality tends to be poor.
But like you I'm still drawn to these sites. This one (and the network) are on my list of sites to join at some time.
|
04-25-13 05:32am
|
Reply
43
|
Wow Porn
(1)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Excellent review as always. I'm really glad to hear that the webmaster has created a good bundle of sites with the network. I'll definitely be renewing my membership soon.
|
04-25-13 05:29am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, I guess this is another area where I'm a bit out of the mainstream. I'm not a big fan of vaginal fisting, but I doo keep an eye out for anal fisting. Male on female anal fisting is pretty rare though. Probably for a good reason...
|
04-13-13 05:36am
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I'm not really sure what the question is, but if it is something that is bad for me, then the answer is yes.
|
04-01-13 05:45pm
|
Reply
46
|
Dominated Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks for the comments Jay.
|
03-10-13 02:46pm
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I don't consider that I 'live here,' but I do pop by a couple of times per day...
|
03-10-13 05:53am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I remember getting the email from the guy and having to read it multiple times to make sure I wasn't confused. The worst thing is that I really liked the site (aside from the streaming-only) and gave it a high score based on content but I said in the review that potential members needed to be aware that it is streaming only. As I recall now, his beef wasn't that I told people it was streaming but that I said he was unclear whether it was streaming. He pointed to his Terms of Service which were VERY vague as proof that he made it clear to people that the site was streaming only. I don't think the TOS was clear at all, and even so, how many people read the TOS before joining a site?
But I am still convinced that regardless of what he said his issue was, that he was really mad that I probably killed 90% of his potential business from PU members by pointing out that there were no downloads. (The site was new and hadn't been reviewed by the TBP folks yet.)
|
03-09-13 04:26pm
|
Reply
49
|
Girls Do Porn
(2)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
What an excellent review! Seriously. Detailed and thorough with every word contributing to the overall point.
This is a site I've thought about joining and I still might even though it has a lot wrong with it. I think just having a reputable biller is enough to cure a lot of problems because I know my risk is just the cost of the membership.
|
03-09-13 05:06am
|
Reply
50
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Good point on a possible source of material for them.
I discovered something that I thought was odd about the site. I'm going through there and replacing some of my favourite scenes that I had downloaded as lower-res wmvs with the best resolution H.264 on offer and I noticed that Burning Angel studio gave VB almost everything in HD whereas other studios have nothing in HD. I assumed that VB licenced the material and decided how to upload it, but it may be that they're licence is a lot more restrictive.
|
03-09-13 04:56am
|
