Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (358)  

Feedback:   All (1899)  |   Reviews (147)  |   Comments (125)  |   Replies (1627)

Other:   Replies Received (1049)  |   Trust Ratings (70)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 1627 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Anabolic.com

Anabolic.com
(0)
Reply of qvtta's Comment

This sucks. In its day, Anabolic was my favorite porn studio and they knocked out some amazing porn. I hope that this is a biller problem and not a site problem. I see that the secondary biller is Epoch and I trust them but I don't know how easy it is to get billed through them.

If your membership does finally get resolved can you post a review or at least a comment with some details please? Information on file resolutions would be great.

And welcome to PornUsers. I hope you stick around and continue to contribute.


03-14-15  06:51am

Reply
27
Visit Ghetto Gaggers

Ghetto Gaggers
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment

I'm no fan of download limits but I can live with reasonable ones. The problem is defining what's reasonable and you hit the nail on the head. 20GB per days sounds reasonable, but is it when a scene can be as much as 3GB? I don't think so... They need to up the limit (or scrap it altogether).

03-14-15  06:46am

Reply
28
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(3)
Reply of pat362's Review

Thanks for the review pat. I agree that the site needs some growth, especially at the price they're charging. When I joined I got a discount offer in the email but as I stated in an earlier forum thread I stopped getting those email offers from all Fame sites. Maybe they were losing money on me because I took them up on their offers so often... (I'm just kidding, because by using their offers I pretty much retained a recurring membership by cancelling and rejoining on a new discount offer almost immediately so all I was getting were the new updates.) They really need a discount. There was a lot of buzz about the site when it first came out but now that it has died down $30 for this volume of porn isn't a good deal no matter how great the scenes are.

03-14-15  06:44am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think that it is likely that all of us who post here are probably both smarter and pickier than the average porn surfer just by virtue of being here. For most of us here porn surfing (and more important, buying) is a hobby rather than randomly browsing through a tube site to relieve some 'stress.'

I'm guessing that the 'average' porn surfer these days is someone who relies on tube sites for stolen porn. That alone definitely makes a vast majority of us here different from an average surfer.


03-14-15  06:39am

Reply
30
Visit Southern Bukkake

Southern Bukkake
(2)
Reply of bkreidercrhl's Review

I love sites like this but wasn't aware of this one. Thanks for posting the review. This seems like Cum on Her Face which I don't think updates any more. I liked that for the many outdoor bukkakes they had and some of the zany peripheral things they did. In one scene one of the female models arrived to an outdoor bukkake on a bike where the pedals drove a dildo up and down through the seat and fucked her while she rode.

I note that the TBP specs on the site list it has having really low resolutions on the downloads. Can you post some info on that please? If they use a resolution on newer scenes that reflects what is average in the 21st century then I'll likely join. If the scenes are really still 352x240 then I'll stay away. A resolution like 352x240 belongs in the 1990s. Any information you can provide will be appreciated.


03-14-15  06:36am

Reply
31
Visit Teen Mega World

Teen Mega World
(3)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

Great review of a great site. I'm a fan of it too.

I agree 100% that using numbers as scene names is annoying. I hope some webmasters see your comment and think about it. I usually rename the scenes as I download them but it would be nice to have the option of renaming later and still having some hope of knowing what the scene is.


03-14-15  06:31am

Reply
32
Visit Nuru Massage

Nuru Massage
(2)
Reply of PigPoke's Reply

I understand what you mean. I can't watch more than a few scenes back-to-back because they get repetitive, but I still like the site and the scenes a lot. For me, a quirk is that the scene set-up is probably more important than the sex itself so that's one of the reasons I like this site and the whole massage niche in general.

03-14-15  06:28am

Reply
33
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't have a lot of interaction with webmasters, but when I do it does influence me. I'm keeping a recurring membership going for one site now because I want to support a really customer-friendly webmaster.

There are other sites that I won't ever rejoin due to a bad experience. In one case I was accused of site ripping in one day that was later found to be the site's weak security that allowed someone to hack in and steal everything. The webmaster admitted his mistake but didn't apologize. But the real winner is a webmaster who threatened me with legal action for posting a review here that said the site was streaming only. It was streaming only and I guess he wanted that to remain a secret to fleece others.


03-08-15  08:14am

Reply
34
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(1)
Reply of Jay G's Comment

I'm not 100% sure but I think the lower price is for Woodman Casting X and if you pay the higher price you get Wake Up 'n Fuck too. WUNF is worth the membership fee. It isn't considered a stand-alone site here so there is no way to add a review, but it is a great site. Let me know if you want more information on WUNF.

03-06-15  07:44am

Reply
35
N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

I don't trust tour pages that won't let me see what they have to offer. If they have a great site why not let me see it? Unless the site gets rave reviews I won't join a site that won't even let me see what models they have before kicking me to their join page.

03-06-15  07:42am

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have to confess that I have no idea what this is...

02-21-15  05:44am

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nope. Not really sure why either. One of my favorite models is Maryjane Johnson. I could look at pics and videos of her all day long. But those of her when she was pregnant do nothing for me. Maybe it's the 'protector' gene in me that comes out and displaces the 'pervert' gene when I see a pregnant woman.

02-18-15  02:24pm

Reply
38
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(4)
Reply of pilotguy's Comment

It always baffles me why a site like this has to stoop to such shady practices. As you've probably read in other comments you aren't the first PU member to be burned by BB. I got burned too - twice. I do still join the site but I treat it like a minefield as one errant click of your mouse and you end up with additional charges. BB has some excellent porn so it makes me wonder what they hope to gain by pissing of customers.

Just a warning - don't click on any links in any promotional emails you get from them. If they have your credit card information - surprise! - you just joined. The sender for their emails that I get is "Support." Support, my ass...


02-13-15  01:01pm

Reply
39
Visit I Worship Anal

I Worship Anal
(0)
Reply of bumbinky05's Comment

Thanks for posting the warning. This is a site that I would have considered joining but I'll definitely stay away knowing what you went through.

02-13-15  12:57pm

Reply
40
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of Triple's Reply

It's still ticket based. There is a 'free' section, but it's older stuff.

02-12-15  03:21pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Most times I've encountered them there was an option to turn them off. Otherwise, I'm no fan of them.

02-12-15  03:20pm

Reply
42
Visit Pornstar Network

Pornstar Network
(1)
Reply of standard's Review

I had joined this site a while back when joining through TBP gave you the upgrade for free. That free upgrade is no longer offered. What I didn't realize was how useless the PSN membership is without that upgrade. I was planning to rejoin soon thinking that it wouldn't be too bad, but after reading your review I think I'll reconsider that. You just saved me some money and frustration. Thanks!

02-10-15  06:08pm

Reply
43
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of Scotchfan's Reply

Thanks for weighing in on this thread. You make some valid points that will be useful for anyone else considering a membership here.

Towards the end of my one-month membership I realized that I needed to think about the site differently from a traditional membership-based site. I really did need to be more selective, but that isn't a bad thing. The next time I join (and there will be a next time with a three-month membership) I'll go in knowing that I need to approach things differently.

One point you mention that didn't occur to me but really needs to be highlighted is the sheer number of updates available here. It may have been me who contrasted LP with Kink. if I did it was more about the type of porn rather than the frequency of uploads, but you're right: this site adds a lot. And what they upload isn't cheap to make so buyers should expect to pay more.

I've always made the point that I'm willing to pay for porn because that means that more porn will be produced. The LP model is a clear example of that.

I'd agree that even with the confusing business model, the quantity of some unique and amazing porn makes this a best-in-class site. Admittedly this is a small class, but LP rules it.


02-10-15  06:05pm

Reply
44
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Thanks to TBP and PU I am usually able to join sites that I know I'll like and will be high quality. So once I join I will usually download everything that I want within a week.

02-08-15  05:20am

Reply
45
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(3)
Reply of greg909's Reply

No. The individual photos come in at 1600x1065. To get the higher resolution you have to download the zipped set.

02-07-15  12:21pm

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I have to plead ignorance on this one. At a minimum, I download 1080x720 but in some cases that still looks like crap. I suspect that the dimensions are just one piece of the puzzle and that bitrate is a big part of it too.

Coincidentally, I think this an apt use of Justice Potter Stewart's comment about porn: I can't define it, but I know it when I see it.


02-07-15  05:29am

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I look for quality and good reviews. My porn tastes are broad enough that I can be happy with a wide selection of sites.

02-04-15  05:46pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of pornwatcher's Poll

It seems that so much of porn these days seems to skip over the woman's pleasure. But if we're permitted some editorial licence, my favorite oral to watch is a man or woman going down on a woman who is on all fours. Add some rimming in and I can watch that for hours...

02-03-15  05:30am

Reply
49
Visit Digital Playground

Digital Playground
(2)
Reply of host2626's Reply

I agree. That's ALWAYS a deal-breaker for me too. The only reason I joined was based on stingerxxx's comment that if you have Internet Download Manager the site streams in HTTP so you can capture that. Without that knowledge I would never have joined the site.

I hope I haven't broken any of the PU rules by revealing that.


02-03-15  05:27am

Reply
50
Visit Passion HD

Passion HD
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

I always read the TBP reviews but a disadvantage that they have (and I'm sure that this is the same of any review site, of any product) is that they aren't long-term customers. I rely on the TBP members who spend a longer time at the site over multiple memberships to find the real weaknesses at a site. Take download limits, for example. I don't fault the TBP reviewers for not finding a limit (provided that it isn't really low) because as a reviewer they're less likely to use the site as a real customer. If it's a snowy weekend and that new site I joined has a 100GB limit then I'll find it and report it. A reviewer, who is a more casual site user, would likely not find a 100GB limit.

I don't think that the TBP reviews are less objective than the user-based ones. They're likely more objective. But as a commercial review site they just don't have the time to spend on a site that a PU member has.

As for not flagging that scenes aren't exclusive, I really can't fault them for that either. Some of the PU regulars are encyclopedias of porn and I rely on those members for some of that information.


01-31-15  04:58am


Shown : 26-50 of 1627 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.19 seconds.