| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Poll
agreed on ccbill and paycom. I would like to see a category for reviewing billing companies. When entering card info, I always check the name on the SSL certificate. I don't like it when porn sites take "up-front" info before passing off to billing site (like zip code or full name).
|
08-12-07 08:09pm
|
Rating
27
|
Reel Pass
(0)
86.0
|
No Review.
|
08-07-07 07:32pm
|
Reply
28
|
Real Peachez
(2)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Reply
It is a blowjob / handjob scene. She's real cute, but she didn't seem overly excited.
|
07-08-07 09:09pm
|
Rating
29
|
Real Peachez
(2)
93.0
|
No Review.
|
07-08-07 09:05pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't mind if a model wants to get a fresh image and chooses a new name. Sometimes its even like a game of match the model to the name. I CAN understand why an individual model would want to change the name she is known by. If I think that this was exclusively at the model's discression, then my respect for the site actually increases!
I have also seen sites that use new names for every model. Even in this case it doesn't annoy me. But it does make me wonder what's up with that? I even wonder if some cheesy web sites use fake names because they are using stolen content. Maybe they are trying to defeat web crawlers that agencies use to locate stolen content. My other theory is that some web sites are so cheesy that none of the models would want their names associated with the site.
Also, if I only liked meat-loaf prepared one way, then I would seek out the restaurants that served it that way. I probably wouldn't care what they called it, though.
|
05-24-07 08:37pm
|
Review
31
|
Babes.tv
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Hot top models looking super glamorous in video and photos.
Models often masterbate with dildos.
Discounted access to other glamour sites from same company.
Clear audio on most videos.
Music doesn't overpower sounds of models.
Jessica Jaymes rocks! |
| Cons: |
Not the most content (not the least either)
Video updates are once or twice per week?
Content could be more daring. |
| Bottom Line: |
Great softcore content. The class is dripping in most scenes. Showcases some of my favorite models. While it may not be the only site with these models, it seems to have a lot of original content. |
|
03-20-07 09:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
32
|
VideoBox
(11)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge video catalogue in multiple resolutions.
Fully downloadable.
Many categories of video.
Has both hardcore and softcore.
Download just the parts of the movie that you want.
Many top porn stars.
Many ways to navigate through content. |
| Cons: |
Could use more softcore.
Indexes could include a few more categories.
Site was down (overloaded?) two times that I tried to connect. Seems to have been resolved.
Some of the movie choices have more violent hardcore than I care for. |
| Bottom Line: |
Has many of the movies that pay-per-view sites offer, but fully downloadable without restriction. I often click on the suggested scenes, because they are what I am looking for.
I disagree with some of the comments that the movie choices are too narrow. There is a lot of variation in the types of movies. |
|
03-20-07 09:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I prefer to see condom use, because they represent regular guys in porn. The ones without condoms have to go through regular testing or they are just a-holes who could be spreading disease. By employing condoms, a greater variety of hot women would consider hardcore.
|
03-01-07 08:22pm
|
Review
34
|
Draggin Ladies
(0)
67.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Models interact with camera very well.
- Sexy clothing
- Good masterbation scenes.
- Most vids are 640x480 and good bit rate.
- Sounds come from models: talking dirty, moaning, sucking noises.
- No DRM.
- The previews really show you what you get. |
| Cons: |
- Unusual payment company, but they did honor my advance cancellation of autorebill.
- Models could spend more time with unlit cigarette - tease with it (some do).
- They might attract a wider variety of model types by not requiring the the models actually smoke the cigarettes.
|
| Bottom Line: |
There were only a few models that really did it for me, but they were worth it. I would rejoin if they brought back Ashley Fires or Cassie Young for new stuff.
I also love sites that give lots of free stuff up front. |
|
01-08-07 08:36pm
Replies (1)
|
