Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : nineinch (8)  

Feedback:   All (40)  |   Reviews (12)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (28)

Other:   Replies Received (9)  |   Trust Ratings (15)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-40 of 40 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I admit I'm vain and a little shallow. I like to see the model look at the camera as though I'm right there with her. My perfect video spends 70% of the time on the model's face with her frequent looks into the camera and doing something with her mouth. Assuming she has a pretty face!

05-24-08  08:57pm

Review
27
Visit LV Legs

LV Legs
(0)

72.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good photos of about 100 hot ladies
many types of nylons used
pics in 200K or 400K sizes
many models have several sets
most sets have some pics with bare breasts and pussy
Cons: no videos
no zips
primitive site layout (model index only)
Bottom Line: I love many of the photos, but I wish there were videos. Many models have great legs and asses. Many shots master the tease and understand legs and feet fetish.

I would come back if they added videos.

04-06-08  08:58pm

Replies (1)
Review
28
Visit Oliver Klozov

Oliver Klozov
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are some hot girls here.
Girls play with the camera a bit - lots of teasing.
About 450 picture sets.
I signed up for 9.95 by joining Nextdoor-models
No video DRM.
Cons: Very limited video content (about 70 girls with videos)
No ZIP file download for pics
Video updates to site are infrequent
Many videos have poor resolution. They seem to be fixing that, but new softcore video updates are so infrequent.
Bottom Line: There is some rare footage of a few stars as well as some good camera interaction. I don't know, but the material seem original. I just don't think it is worth full price for most. I'm not even sure about 9.95, but I might come back in a couple of years.

03-14-08  07:26pm

Replies (0)
Reply
29
N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

Talking may never be real, but very little about porn is real. I would rather hear chicks than music or guys. I like it when East Europe girls try to speak english. I like hearing the sounds their mouths make real close. So close that I can hear the shape of their throat and tongue. I like the sound of a tongue post hitting a dildo or anything else. I don't care what they are saying, but too often they think they know what I want to hear, but they don't. If I hear one more girl say "don't you wish this was your cock?" I'd rather hear "I wish this was your cock!" I also wish more girls would pretend to enjoy it. Laughing and playing with the audience are good. Some porn stars are experts at the tease.

Bottom line - I'd rather hear them try to talk than not. Moaning and other sounds are good too.


01-13-08  07:40pm

Review
30
Visit Alta Smoking

Alta Smoking
(0)

87.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: select group of girls
erotic smoking
sexy videos - no DRM
quality photos
nice makup and outfits
Cons: small site
updates could be more frequent
no zip download for pics
could use higher resolution on pics and video
Bottom Line: one of my favorite smoking sites. I don't care about actual smoking - more models could pretend with an unlit cigarette. The girls are fashion model quality.

Site could be cheaper or have more content.

11-02-07  11:43pm

Replies (0)
Review
31
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of great looking women
- enough pics and videos to keep you busy for a long time
- Many of the videos are candid
- Clear authentic sound quality with some close oral sounds
- Nice hardcore. Nothing too brutal
- Plenty of softcore (my preference)
Cons: - Limited video format: split in 2 (softcore) or 4 (hc)
- Could be more creative: Kinkier stuff, more teasing by women, experiment with makup and fetishes.
- needs better search engine (not big issue)
- more oral teasing and and oral sex.
Bottom Line: Great site with lots of good content. I like more solo videos and shots. They are focusing on the amateur angle, but they could take more chances on new angles.

10-01-07  08:18pm

Replies (1)
Reply
32
N/A Reply of DivBZero's Poll

agreed on ccbill and paycom. I would like to see a category for reviewing billing companies. When entering card info, I always check the name on the SSL certificate. I don't like it when porn sites take "up-front" info before passing off to billing site (like zip code or full name).

08-12-07  08:09pm

Rating
33
Visit Reel Pass

Reel Pass
(0)

86.0
No Review.
08-07-07  07:32pm

Reply
34
Visit Real Peachez

Real Peachez
(1)
Reply of DpornGuy's Reply

It is a blowjob / handjob scene. She's real cute, but she didn't seem overly excited.

07-08-07  09:09pm

Rating
35
Visit Real Peachez

Real Peachez
(1)

93.0
No Review.
07-08-07  09:05pm

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I don't mind if a model wants to get a fresh image and chooses a new name. Sometimes its even like a game of match the model to the name. I CAN understand why an individual model would want to change the name she is known by. If I think that this was exclusively at the model's discression, then my respect for the site actually increases!

I have also seen sites that use new names for every model. Even in this case it doesn't annoy me. But it does make me wonder what's up with that? I even wonder if some cheesy web sites use fake names because they are using stolen content. Maybe they are trying to defeat web crawlers that agencies use to locate stolen content. My other theory is that some web sites are so cheesy that none of the models would want their names associated with the site.

Also, if I only liked meat-loaf prepared one way, then I would seek out the restaurants that served it that way. I probably wouldn't care what they called it, though.


05-24-07  08:37pm

Review
37
Visit Babes.tv

Babes.tv
(0)

94.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Hot top models looking super glamorous in video and photos.
Models often masterbate with dildos.
Discounted access to other glamour sites from same company.
Clear audio on most videos.
Music doesn't overpower sounds of models.
Jessica Jaymes rocks!
Cons: Not the most content (not the least either)
Video updates are once or twice per week?
Content could be more daring.
Bottom Line: Great softcore content. The class is dripping in most scenes. Showcases some of my favorite models. While it may not be the only site with these models, it seems to have a lot of original content.

03-20-07  09:47pm

Replies (1)
Review
38
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)

93.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge video catalogue in multiple resolutions.
Fully downloadable.
Many categories of video.
Has both hardcore and softcore.
Download just the parts of the movie that you want.
Many top porn stars.
Many ways to navigate through content.
Cons: Could use more softcore.
Indexes could include a few more categories.
Site was down (overloaded?) two times that I tried to connect. Seems to have been resolved.
Some of the movie choices have more violent hardcore than I care for.
Bottom Line: Has many of the movies that pay-per-view sites offer, but fully downloadable without restriction. I often click on the suggested scenes, because they are what I am looking for.
I disagree with some of the comments that the movie choices are too narrow. There is a lot of variation in the types of movies.

03-20-07  09:18pm

Replies (0)
Reply
39
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

I prefer to see condom use, because they represent regular guys in porn. The ones without condoms have to go through regular testing or they are just a-holes who could be spreading disease. By employing condoms, a greater variety of hot women would consider hardcore.

03-01-07  08:22pm

Review
40
Visit Draggin Ladies

Draggin Ladies
(0)

67.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Models interact with camera very well.
- Sexy clothing
- Good masterbation scenes.
- Most vids are 640x480 and good bit rate.
- Sounds come from models: talking dirty, moaning, sucking noises.
- No DRM.
- The previews really show you what you get.
Cons: - Unusual payment company, but they did honor my advance cancellation of autorebill.
- Models could spend more time with unlit cigarette - tease with it (some do).
- They might attract a wider variety of model types by not requiring the the models actually smoke the cigarettes.

Bottom Line: There were only a few models that really did it for me, but they were worth it. I would rejoin if they brought back Ashley Fires or Cassie Young for new stuff.
I also love sites that give lots of free stuff up front.

01-08-07  08:36pm

Replies (1)

Shown : 26-40 of 40 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.06 seconds.