Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : nineinch (8)  

Feedback:   All (44)  |   Reviews (12)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (32)

Other:   Replies Received (9)  |   Trust Ratings (15)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 44 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of great looking women
- enough pics and videos to keep you busy for a long time
- Many of the videos are candid
- Clear authentic sound quality with some close oral sounds
- Nice hardcore. Nothing too brutal
- Plenty of softcore (my preference)
Cons: - Limited video format: split in 2 (softcore) or 4 (hc)
- Could be more creative: Kinkier stuff, more teasing by women, experiment with makup and fetishes.
- needs better search engine (not big issue)
- more oral teasing and and oral sex.
Bottom Line: Great site with lots of good content. I like more solo videos and shots. They are focusing on the amateur angle, but they could take more chances on new angles.

10-01-07  08:18pm

Replies (1)
Visit Babes.tv


Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Hot top models looking super glamorous in video and photos.
Models often masterbate with dildos.
Discounted access to other glamour sites from same company.
Clear audio on most videos.
Music doesn't overpower sounds of models.
Jessica Jaymes rocks!
Cons: Not the most content (not the least either)
Video updates are once or twice per week?
Content could be more daring.
Bottom Line: Great softcore content. The class is dripping in most scenes. Showcases some of my favorite models. While it may not be the only site with these models, it seems to have a lot of original content.

03-20-07  09:47pm

Replies (1)
Visit Danni.com


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: No DRM!
Top Models
Large collection
great variety of scenes / themes
great photography and direction
keywords help search navigation
Lots of breast content
Cons: not all of the original videos have been remastered.
Some photosets are small.
Bottom Line: If you are into softcore, then you must have heard of Danni. I have been a member from time to time and the latest version has even more stuff. While they got rid of some of the old "extra content" links (like SoftBodies, etc...), I don't really miss it. Also, getting rid of DRM will get me coming back.

Danni has always maintained a wholesome, safe site, where the models seem to be having a good time. Sometimes the content is a little too safe.
The models play an active role in the content as in the "My Own Video" series.

It even reminds me of the old Playboy - with Danni playing the role of Hef. I love it for it's candy sweetness, while others may hate it for the same reason.

07-22-08  10:51pm

Replies (2)
Visit Real Peachez

Real Peachez

No Review.
07-08-07  09:05pm

Visit VideoBox


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge video catalogue in multiple resolutions.
Fully downloadable.
Many categories of video.
Has both hardcore and softcore.
Download just the parts of the movie that you want.
Many top porn stars.
Many ways to navigate through content.
Cons: Could use more softcore.
Indexes could include a few more categories.
Site was down (overloaded?) two times that I tried to connect. Seems to have been resolved.
Some of the movie choices have more violent hardcore than I care for.
Bottom Line: Has many of the movies that pay-per-view sites offer, but fully downloadable without restriction. I often click on the suggested scenes, because they are what I am looking for.
I disagree with some of the comments that the movie choices are too narrow. There is a lot of variation in the types of movies.

03-20-07  09:18pm

Replies (0)
Visit Alta Smoking

Alta Smoking

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: select group of girls
erotic smoking
sexy videos - no DRM
quality photos
nice makup and outfits
Cons: small site
updates could be more frequent
no zip download for pics
could use higher resolution on pics and video
Bottom Line: one of my favorite smoking sites. I don't care about actual smoking - more models could pretend with an unlit cigarette. The girls are fashion model quality.

Site could be cheaper or have more content.

11-02-07  11:43pm

Replies (0)
Visit Reel Pass

Reel Pass

No Review.
08-07-07  07:32pm

Visit LV Legs

LV Legs

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good photos of about 100 hot ladies
many types of nylons used
pics in 200K or 400K sizes
many models have several sets
most sets have some pics with bare breasts and pussy
Cons: no videos
no zips
primitive site layout (model index only)
Bottom Line: I love many of the photos, but I wish there were videos. Many models have great legs and asses. Many shots master the tease and understand legs and feet fetish.

I would come back if they added videos.

04-06-08  08:58pm

Replies (1)
Visit Draggin Ladies

Draggin Ladies

Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Models interact with camera very well.
- Sexy clothing
- Good masterbation scenes.
- Most vids are 640x480 and good bit rate.
- Sounds come from models: talking dirty, moaning, sucking noises.
- No DRM.
- The previews really show you what you get.
Cons: - Unusual payment company, but they did honor my advance cancellation of autorebill.
- Models could spend more time with unlit cigarette - tease with it (some do).
- They might attract a wider variety of model types by not requiring the the models actually smoke the cigarettes.

Bottom Line: There were only a few models that really did it for me, but they were worth it. I would rejoin if they brought back Ashley Fires or Cassie Young for new stuff.
I also love sites that give lots of free stuff up front.

01-08-07  08:36pm

Replies (1)
Visit Alta Heels

Alta Heels

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: hot leggy models
intimate situations
models talk to camera
Cons: Download limit disables your account. They should at least warn you that you are approaching limit.
Limited selection.
Model Tiffany removed and yet she is still shown on the front page (before joining)
Instead of consolidating sites to bring more content for less money, they decided to split off content to multiple sites.
No ZIP files for pics.
Bottom Line: If you are into intimate videos of leggy women, then this site has some better models.
On the other hand, they are taking a rip off the customer approach with download limits that shutdown customer accounts, and splitting up the content.

06-20-10  08:19pm

Replies (3)
Visit Oliver Klozov

Oliver Klozov

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are some hot girls here.
Girls play with the camera a bit - lots of teasing.
About 450 picture sets.
I signed up for 9.95 by joining Nextdoor-models
No video DRM.
Cons: Very limited video content (about 70 girls with videos)
No ZIP file download for pics
Video updates to site are infrequent
Many videos have poor resolution. They seem to be fixing that, but new softcore video updates are so infrequent.
Bottom Line: There is some rare footage of a few stars as well as some good camera interaction. I don't know, but the material seem original. I just don't think it is worth full price for most. I'm not even sure about 9.95, but I might come back in a couple of years.

03-14-08  07:26pm

Replies (0)
Visit Ember 19

Ember 19

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Ember is cute.
You can download all 5 videos of her (no DRM)
Cons: The site was hacked by AKINCILAR
Only 5 videos
Videos are extremely amateurish
Attempting to access pictures leads to hacked message
No zip files for pictures
Bottom Line: I don't know what made me try the site. I have seen her on other sites and I always thought she had a great smile. Unfortunately, her site is growing mold (and hackers).

I emailed ember19@gmail.com , but I have not received a reply. I'll update if things improve. I suppose they need to rid themselves of hackers first.

11-17-08  05:49pm

Replies (0)
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I figure there is rivalry among porn stars to have the best tatoos. But when large areas of their body are completely covered it seem like they are more interested in winning tatoo competitions than in serving their porn customers. I suppose they could do both, but it takes a bit for me to get used to.

Also, some women seem to do it for porn marketing. I forget who it was, but the first time I saw gift wrapping ribbons on a girl's legs I thought she was making herself more of an object of desire.

I would take an arm full of tats over fake boobs, any day. But I would rather see a tongue, nipple or clit post over either.

06-27-15  06:36am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It depends. I don't like to see rough hardcore if the woman isn't fully enjoying it. Also, I like to see teasing. Some actresses tease better in solo while others do it better in hardcore.

03-21-15  09:37pm

N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

Maybe I should have said other. Most pay sites are helpful, but a few are scams.

02-26-15  08:43pm

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I don't have a problem with sites wanting to track their content and go after crooks who illegally share it. At the same time, I do want them to publish and protect the explicit rights of the consumer. There should be no ambiguity in terms of what the DRM is supposed to do and some basics about how it works. I don't mean they should divulge exactly how it's done, but I do mean the behavior and legal rights of the consumer in plain English (as well as the 30 pages of legal sh*t).

01-31-15  07:30pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I generally prefer solo scenes, so I might pass up a good solo scene because the pic mislead me to think it had sex.

12-13-14  03:06pm

N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

It's not as bad when I use someone else's private information. :) With Poodle I have to make sure I am using TLS (disable sslv3 from browser). My biggest concern is trusting that my information is going to a trusted company. I use cash in a lot of stores now (especially Target). Who can you trust?

11-08-14  06:07pm

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

As a guy, I prefer a good sperm-count of pix to a poor egg-count.

Seriously, out of 50 pix I sometimes only find 2 or 3 that I really like. If there are only 10 pix in the set, then I might long for a slightly different angle, facial expression or pose. For me, the model's facial expression is a big part of it.

08-11-14  07:03pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It depends on how much space they take up. I can keep dozens of older videos for the size of one 1080p HD. For that reason I usually just go for 720p. I even go for 540p in some cases. I would rather delete a few big new files than some of the older gems. I play the older smaller videos in 2x size, because they retain some of the clarity while my poor eyes appreciate the larger size.

07-04-14  06:21pm

N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

I don't know about aliens in the Whitehouse, but Graymane's story got me to stop surfing porn until I could stop laughing.

04-05-14  03:33pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The DownThemAll plugin to Firefox is very flexible and can be tuned to any number of files or pieces at a time. You can also put in delays to make it more human-like. I'm sure the web site owners can tell, however. If I do 1 file per site with delay, that shouldn't have an impact on other users' experience.

02-23-14  07:18pm

N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

I'm very nervous about scams and malware. I haven't been burned recently, but I use sandboxie for all new sites and I am very cautious. If PU accepts the site and there are reviews, then that's a form of assurance. http://www.siteadvisor.com also helps.
If I have confidence, then a good preview makes a huge difference. To put it another way, not having a preview will usually turn me off. I don't join Danni any more because the preview is so limited.

04-17-13  04:50pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

What matters to me is the emotional and creative parts of porn. Some softcore scenes are really dull and there are hardcore scenes that have better acting, teasing and the like. However, a lot of hardcore scenes don't give the female model enough of a role. They often devolve into dom - submissive or outright humiliation of the woman. Not that I like dom women either. I just like the models (directors, etc...) to remember that I am the paying customer. The woman should look at the camera and get me off. That usually works better in softcore.

12-27-12  11:07am

N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

My niche is faces. I like tongue posts, braces, puckered lips and eye liner. Smiles, objects in mouth, and sucking noises. Eyes that blink, wink, widen in wonder. Faces that say f**k me and the face of orgasm. Blue, green and hazel eyes. Good makeup or no makeup. Well-placed glitter and beauty marks.

But, at the end of the day it's what she does with her face that matters. One of my favorites is a close up of Sophie Strauss begging for me to blow my load on her face.

09-03-12  09:35am

Shown : 1-25 of 44 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.51 seconds.