Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : turboshaft (24)  

Feedback:   All (676)  |   Reviews (11)  |   Comments (13)  |   Replies (652)

Other:   Replies Received (234)  |   Trust Ratings (41)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 678 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I wish they'd shut the fuck up!

But, somehow, even worse is the sleazy heavy breathing when the camera mic is set a little to high and you can just hear the guy's wheezing throughout the scene--think Phillip Seymour Hoffman in Happiness, and sometimes with much the same dialogue. But at least there it was funny.

10-08-14  06:32am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

One of those lazy porn tropes I don't care for at all.

I guess some are into it; like it makes the scene truly "hard" or something, but I find it unnecessary and disrespectful. You can easily make a scene hot and nasty without so blatantly hating the women in it. And rough sex in general doesn't actually require such contrived name-calling to make it entertaining.

For my money, Kink.com is the biggest culprit of this practice, especially when they have a mini interview at the beginning where everyone comes across as happy and friendly...followed by an hour of stilted slurs and put-downs. Their whole schtick is consensual nastiness yet can't seem to give up the verbal abuse.

10-01-14  06:26pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Except for the racially-focused genres (which I find to be part of the problem), no.

08-26-14  07:18pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Prefer the option of picking my own, especially if the membership goes on for a while--and this should be true of any site requiring a password.

If you're allowed to pick your own password (using a password generator) that's longer and more complicated, then the site's isn't necessarily more secure.

08-23-14  01:31pm

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

CDs already gone this way have for serious data and video storage.

Audio CDs have been around since 1982, but they aren't impervious to the effects of time and environment. The aluminum alloy used isn't exactly the most corrosion-resistant material available--if at least being considerably cheaper than gold--but it's pretty amazing to think that CDs are still around after three+ decades. (LaserDisc is, of course, older, but it's not truly digital nor has it ever been that popular.)

07-23-14  03:35pm

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

True, in the sense that you kept an "old shoot" because it had some value to it, beyond what a new shoot may only have in pixels. I've kept (and backed up) plenty of old material that's not HD and frequently delete newer stuff.

07-21-14  11:43pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

I think I first heard "landing strip" in middle school (probably the only knowledge I still retain from then, go figure), so I thought it was American vernacular. I generally think of landing strips as narrower than the "rectangle" the poll is referring to--though to say it could always use more study is an understatement!

As always, Wikipedia has an article on it, and I also found a helpful line drawing comparing the more common styles--see the difference between "Mohawk" and "Landing Strip."

I like to think there is some international board or committee secretly meeting somewhere to standardize the terms and their definitions. :-)

07-16-14  05:31pm

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Supply and demand; plenty of both, so a lot of people don't feel the need to pay for what they see as a nearly bottomless well of smut. And everything is digital, so pirating takes almost no effort, arguably easier than even subscribing to a site.

Outside of porn, I have a hard time being totally sympathetic to larger companies that can afford some pirating and don't work to make it more attractive for viewers to pay. HBO is the best example at the moment. A premium cable channel that offers no online-only subscription because of current infrastructure and provider agreements. They don't want to piss off the cable monopolies, and way more Americans' homes are wired for cable TV than high speed Internet. So they figure it's not yet time for standalone Go service yet--and they are well aware that lot of people pirate their most popular content.

07-11-14  05:11pm

N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

Been meaning to replace/upgrade my current 2+ year old smartphone (Luddite!), though with my phone plan I should only have to pay for a relatively small "upgrade fee," not the actual phone itself.

07-07-14  06:28pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I prefer things full screen, so if the offending photo/vid doesn't pass this test reasonably well then it's straight to the trash bin.

I have plenty of old 640x480 vids that besides being smaller aren't unwatchable, and it's not like the content was ever secretly shot on Imax or something. But I was recently going through stuff I had downloaded from VideosZ and eventually I just started deleting whole folders; the content was just not worth the space.

07-03-14  07:30pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes, always; but fortunately that's not too often. Compared to iTunes--which seems to offer updates every couple of days--my preferred browser (Firefox) isn't too frequent, though I inevitably lose an add-on or two for a couple of updates.

Outside of my computer, my PS3 can be a real pest for updates; it basically doesn't let you use certain games or online apps (like Netflix, for example) if you don't sign in and go through a system or game update. Nothing more irritating about the system than sitting down to watch something on Netflix or play a game and wait ten or fifteen minutes for an update to download, install, and restart. :-(

07-02-14  05:51am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Bottom Line, since I tend to ramble (though this is usually a good sign that I like the site). I also sometimes have trouble coming up with a good score.

06-13-14  02:47am

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Put it into a holding area, though this had been suffering from overcrowding recently. I get lazy and don't bother to organize and upload it to a hard drive.

It's good to review things before just arbitrarily saving it to an external drive. A boring thirty minute video can be an incredible waste of space. Of course going through a few of these just to find out they're all trash/recycle bin worthy can feel like an incredible waste of time. Tags have been helping some cases, especially if I want to quickly find a certain actress or act and avoid duplication (especially due to something stupid like having an older version I saved at a different resolution).

06-02-14  07:04pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I'll add a qualifier to this that would make me love bukkake--albeit in person more than onscreen--a reverse bukkake! :-0

You know, one of those crazy scenes were some "poor" guy is surrounded by a bunch of women who stand over him and then "squirt" on him. Of course part of my fantasy is just being able to remember all their names, but a man can dream...

Or an all-girl bukkake, though those can be kind of rare. JM Productions was producing some pretty entertaining ones in their all-girl gangbang "Violation of" series from mid-1990s to the late 2000s.

05-30-14  10:40pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I don't really care about it, in that I don't go seeking it out and it's pretty easy to avoid in porn, since it's a genre that by name alone is an automatic trigger warning.

I find that with lots of guys and one girl on the receiving end it becomes less sexual and more stunt-like. So you really just end up watching it for the spectacle (spunktacle?) of seeing a woman handle that many "splashes" rather than seeing much semblance of any real enjoyment on her part.

The only time I might seek it out is if there is a certain performer who I thought of as "innocent" of such boy-girl acts and wanted to watch her perform in something outside her usual comfort zone. But once is more than enough in even those rare cases.

05-30-14  10:58am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

LOL! Thanks for the morning laugh, Drooler!

And we all should've taken Karl Marx's Das Bukkake more seriously. :-)

05-30-14  10:51am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I feel that several times a week--spread across multiple days, of course--can qualify as "frequent." Even pornographers need the weekends off. ;-)

There are a few blogs I follow that update multiple times per day and can't even keep up with them, and these are ones written by a single person. I don't expect a reasonably sized porn operation (a handful of people) to update more than once a day. All those 'shopped photos, edited videos, and childishly dirty scene descriptions/terrible translations take time.

05-28-14  09:32pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Webcams seem to emphasize all of my general complaints about porn and turn them up to 11--shitty video quality, terrible-to-nonexistent sound, weak lighting, messy set, and just boring "action."

I'll take a decent quality non-webcam video where the performer acts as if she is playing to the camera than a piss poor one where she's actually doing that.

05-23-14  01:34pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'd say in the B to C range, really depends on the individual woman. C cups can look silly on some smaller-framed women and starts to look like evidence of enthusiastic implanting--the "top-heavy" look, if you will.

05-20-14  06:44pm

N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

That's the whole point--you're not supposed to know! ;-)

That being said, I never get "the porn look" excuse for labiaplasty. Hardcore porn in general seems to have all shapes, sizes, and colors of lips; they're hardly what I would call uniformly small and symmetrical. Even big-breasted, bee stung-lipped models will sport a variety of labia that would furrow the brow of many plastic surgeons. It's softcore/"nude model" stuff that seems to have models with little-to-no labia, as I'm assuming too big may be considered more explicit.

05-19-14  08:03pm

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Surgery involving those "other lips" usually means reduction not enlargement. And even that I find totally unnecessary and one of the penultimate results of societal ignorance over female anatomy. Big labia are not the result of "too much" sex or masturbation--a common myth that's easy enough to exploit by practicing surgeons, and a stereotype that seems to epitomize our cultural obsession with virginal women. The same way possessing a giant penis is no guarantee of being some sort of sexual dynamo--no offense to all the burdened PU'ers. ;-)

What exactly is so attractive about unnaturally enhanced (facial) lips that make people go in for injections? It just looks like someone went a little wild with the lip gloss or got attacked by a swarm of bees, neither of which I find attractive.

And what is so unattractive about big pussy lips? Every person is unique, especially with regards to their body, and I wouldn't hold the body a woman was born with against her. I will even go so far as to say I like them, just as a "fuck you" to all the asshats who are so swamped with sexual advances from women that they can turn away and shame all those they deem inferior because of bigger labia.

05-18-14  06:32pm

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I was going to say "Other" and add "By nature, because we are all human." I don't think sexual desire is itself perverted, neither is seeking out something to satisfy that, even if it is largely fantasy.

And this is why I say "To live out a fantasy" because porn is the great emancipator of the wild fantasies we all have that are too impractical and unrealistic for what most people are looking for in real life. Yeah, two or three or however many girls at once sounds fun, but real life doesn't exactly bookend itself like a porn scene (nor do I need to apologize to more than one girl at a time).

05-12-14  05:53am

N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

Is this about the Donald Sterling's girlfriend?

Supposedly she was the team's archivist--whatever that entails--not really his girlfriend or sexual partner, but he apparently gave her four cars and a duplex worth nearly $2 million since meeting her in 2010. So who says love isn't blind? Granted the guy's racism is a much bigger problem than the nearly half century age difference between them...but it must be nice to be able to afford to spoil her!

05-04-14  06:28pm

N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Don't forget razor burn, pat362! ;-)

In fact pubic shaving in general can show all kinds of flaws when presented in HD: the redness, bumps, and those annoying missed spots. I'll gladly volunteer myself for select--highly select--shaving of female performers if pussy and ass depilation is too delicate a task to be done alone. And even if you deplore the bush-free look do you honestly also want a fully forested ass?

05-01-14  05:44pm

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Though I usually take a certain pleasure in declining to answer such questions I will say "Maybe, maybe not" on this one. :-)

I have watched stuff in groups that might have been just large enough to constitute an "exhibition purpose" that I don't think (legally) bought/downloaded content is allowed for--of course I had no idea if this was ripped or copied stuff in the first place.

If you ever look into the legalese surrounding buying/downloading/renting content it's actually pretty restricted. You don't actually own the content, just a license to personally view your copy, not show it to a big group and definitely not to make money off of it.

Performers probably have it much worse though, as I doubt most of them even own a little if any of their content, and probably have to sign away ownership of it for all space and time before the cameras even start rolling (seriously, appearance releases can read like something that an astronomer had to be consulted on).

04-28-14  08:37pm

Shown : 26-50 of 678 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.8 seconds.