Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Wittyguy (105)  

Feedback:   All (775)  |   Reviews (48)  |   Comments (88)  |   Replies (639)

Other:   Replies Received (389)  |   Trust Ratings (57)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 781 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
51
Visit Swank Pass

Swank Pass
(0)

71.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 8 member network
+ $6, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ Probably over 5000 photo sets (1020x680) with zip.
+ Thousands of video scenes
+ No DRM or download limits
+ Cancellation is easy (you know it's bad when this makes it as a "pro")
Cons: - Almost entirely nonexclusive content
- Search engine does not work. Finding anything of value is a royal pain.
- Quality is poor to average
- Majority of pic sets have fewer than 20 pics
- Majority of vids available only as clips
- Each site updates once a week.
Bottom Line: I really was hoping for more when I signed up, thinking that for $6 (I got off cheap) I would find some OK stuff. NOT!!!

Let's start by saying if you have ever been to a Deny DeFranco (DDF) site, Vivthomas, Karupspc, etc. you've seen all there is of value seeing here. All the content from the last few years appears to be shot by these major studios. It wouldn't be so bad but that the quality is worse (downgraded for this network) and often times you don't get the full scene at least for the pics. Some of the oldest material, mostly photos, I don't recognize so I can't say it's all nonexclusive.

Swank (and all the accompanying network sites) are originally magazine based. Like most magazine sites, they seem unable to make a decent leap to the web; unwilling to shake off what they do in print in hopes of actually having long term economic viability. Swank is apparently betting the farm that some fool will spend money on their mags in the future because they're not investing anything here.

You figure with a network the search would be a great way to bring things together. Nope. The search don't work. You can only browse by vids or pics or model directory. Oh yeah, a lot of sets don't have model names attached to them so good luck.

It gets worse because several of the sites have over a thousand pic sets. It gets worse again because some of these sites don't tell you on the pic preview pages how many pics are in a set so it's hunt and peck (some sets 4 pics, some 300: What's behind the curtain Monty?). It's just too exhausting to hunt and peck through the mounds of reheated content to find the occasional gem. While pic sets go back over a decade it's only the last few years of material where the sets have more than 20 pics per set. Guess what, some of the network sites won't even tell you what year the set was published ... more hunt and peck for gems ... more swearing. Oh yeah, some of the pics only max at 800 pixels despite the fact you click on the icon for large photos. Most of the content is solo, while there is more hc in the last year or two of updates.

The vids max out at 640x480. Some sites having nothing but clips available. Some are about evenly split between full length and clips. Again, all is nonexclusive and average to good quality. About the only good thing is that most of the vids appear to be hardcore.

About half the sites cater to big boobs. Otherwise the models are all over the radar from pornstars to amateurs. The solo model pics tend to be more glam oriented harkening to the magazine theme at work here. There is no content from the mags though besides the pics.

The only reason I can score this in the 70's is because they have a mountain of content and because they still have acceptable pic and video sizes. Don't waste your money even on the trial. Save your pennies and pay a little extra to see the original stuff in mint condition at the sites that sell Swank their material.

04-08-09  09:06pm

Replies (0)
Review
52
Visit Leg Action

Leg Action
(0)

71.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP
+ Full access to 8 other sites (Swankpass network)
+ 960 photo shoots and 343 vids
+ Zip download available
+ No download limits or DRM
+ Smallish watermarks
Cons: - Search function doesn't work & no model directory
- Pic sizes max out at 1020 x 680
- Vids max out at 640 x 480
- About 50% of vids downloadable in clips only
- Mostly nonexclusive contact
- Updates about once a week
Bottom Line: For the price I figured this one was worth a trial. I figured it wouldn't be HotlegsandFeet but I was still hopeful of getting some decent leg shots. As they say "hope springs eternal" ... and this site is just another mediocre pit stop on that long eternal road.

Legaction started as a magazine (the other 8 network sites are also mag oriented). These sites never seem to have their act together enough put out a quality web based product and this one is no different.

Most of this stuff is nonexlusive as they farmed out a lot of the photography. For the hardcore stuff, most of this comes from Deny DiFranco (DDF) so if you've been to his sites recently skip this place. The rest of the hc is stuff you've probably already seen on other mega sites. The solo material has more stuff I haven't seen before but I can't vouch for exclusivity.

The girls here range from known pornstars to amateurs to milfs. The quality of the sets/scenes varies greatly from poor to good.

Pictures: As I said, pics max out at 1020 x 680. The photo archieves date back to 1997 but the sets prior to 2006 are crap. You get about 8 - 16 shots per set there (aka: worthless). The newer stuff spreads out to about 60 to 250 shots. Unfotunately, most of the good stuff (aka newer) is also the stuff you've probably seen already. The quality is average (nothing HQ about it). Most of the pics are solo with about 25% being HC and lez.

Video: There is only a couple years worth of video but only half have full length downloads available. The full downloads range from about 20 to 90 minutes. You can download in wmv, ipod or watch in flash. The older clip based stuff is strange in that you get 3 or 4 short clips with the last clip having most of the content and length. Again, you've probably seen a lot of this stuff from the DDF sites and other megasites. Quality is so-so; the full length clips at, say, 40 minutes long only come in at about 250 mb in file size. About half the vids are HC and the rest solo or lez.

The search function looks good but it doesn't work. You can only search under vids or pics and even then the layout is random, not by date. A lot of models, especially in the pics, have only a first name or no name at all or a "wrong" name so good luck there. There is a model directory.

As a bonus you get a slew of crappy 3rd party streaming feeds that I thought went extinct years ago (thus providing proof of "nonintelligent design" at this site): When's the last time you've seen a streaming vids options at 56k, 128k or 250k? The 8 other network sites are similar to here but have their own content and niches.

As another mild downer, when I ran my card the confirmation page didn't appear. Thus, I had to venture to my email to confirm everything.

Basically, for you leg lovers this site is more like a hamhock then a beautiful gam. The only reason this one scores in the 70's is because of the volume of content and network availability.

04-08-09  05:29pm

Replies (0)
Review
53
Visit Taste The Babes

Taste The Babes
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A good amount of photos with attractive russian girls (about 240 photo sets with about 25% being hardcore) (photo size is 1024 x 680) (about 70 to 120 pics per set)
- Good full access trial price. You get access to about 20 of their websites and dozens of standard 3rd party sites (see "bottom line" below for clarification on this)
- Access to over 240 sites with full monthly membership
Cons: - No zips on photos
- Only about 40 vids (only a couple of them hardcore) with no dowload options (mpeg only); size is only 320x240 (aka don't join this site for the video content)
- Nonexclusive content
- Some advertising on the site
- No search function
- Have to re-enter username/password for each site
- No new updates, material is simply recycled
- 3rd part bonus links (HerfirstATM, Desperateteens, etc.) do not work and all contain nonexclusive material you've probably seen before
- Monthly membership of $40 way too expensive for what you get (in addition to the 20 or so main sites you get additional nonexclusive 3rd party bonus sets, upwards of 250)
- No response to site support inquiries
Bottom Line: I posted a comment about this site a few months ago saying it was worth the trial (I was originally a member a few years ago). Having come back here on a trial all I can say now is "NYET"!

First, TBP is advertising a 3 day, $2 trial. When you go to the billing processor you find out the trial is 2 days for $4. You get access to some of their other sites but I kept random log in popups that kept freezing up my browser (not good).

This site has been around for years yet their oldest update dates to November '07. Bad sign. There was absolutely nothing new in hardcore since the last time I was there years ago. They just recycle their old content as "new updates". You get access to Tastethebabes which is a clone and most of the other exclusive sites are amateurish mature sites.

On the plus side, their stuff is nonexclusive but mostly shared among their sites and I have seen very little of it elsewhere. The girls are attractive russians so if you've not seen the stuff before and are willing to download each pic (no zips) then you might consider joining for the trial.

However, I can in no way justify joining this site for the monthly fee of $40. There are some sites exclusive to their network that have OK stuff but there's not enough quality and not enough quantity to justify the price. Even justifying the trial here is a stretch. Today's PU poll question asks if you've gotten sick of porn before. This site makes me have to answer "Yes".

07-31-08  04:23pm

Replies (1)
Review
54
Visit POV Network

POV Network
(0)

64.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Access to 5 sites
- In expensive trial ($5)
- Some high quality vids and OK photos
- No DRM
- Exclusive content
Cons: - Sites are poorly designed
- Sites stopped updating as of 1/08 with few updates prior to that
- Most sets are lower quality vids and pics
- No zip and only one photo size
- Many dead links
- Not a lot of content
- Admitted history of problems with sites by the webmaster
- Newer pics have large watermarks that sometimes obscure "the stuff"
Bottom Line: This one was pretty much like a bad trip down memory lane. If you remember what porn sites looked like 10 years with broken links, one size fits all vids and photos and minimal web design then you have this site.

I took the trial primarily for povporn.com There were about 30 to 40 girls there. Of those, about 12 had better pics (1020 x 660) as well as good quality vids. The rest had 800 x 600 pics with low quality vids that have to be downloaded in segments. Two other sites only had about a dozen sets each. The main emphasis of the network is on Petersgirls which had the most content but was almost all softcore. By the time I got there, I was pretty much "done" with the whole thing and didn't look at much.

I got a good laugh at the Lapdancegonebad.com website. None of the photo links worked and there 8 videos. The main page had about 24 months of updates. There were no updates on any of the page. Instead there were some webmaster postings dating back to 2006 trying to calm customer complaints about bad links, slow updates, etc. His excuse then was bad support staff and people taking advantage of him. The next month, though, he was bragging about he was going to build a porn empire and turned down a $1 million offer for all his content. Apparently, he "relaunched" in the summer of 2007 but the same problems seem to have continued.

Basically, this network is a waste of time even for the trial offer. Let's just say I took one for the team here.

04-21-08  06:47pm

Replies (4)
Reply
55
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I say the old thread because otherwise (if it's something I've already commented on) I feel like I'm just repeating myself or else I ignore the newly revisited topic. Creating lots of new threads is good for drumming up immediate new interest but gets old if you're a regular.

07-30-15  12:49pm

Reply
56
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I vote "undecided" as I don't have any philosophical objections, just the observation that most people (male or female) who go topless probably shouldn't.

07-11-15  12:53pm

Reply
57
Visit Team Skeet

Team Skeet
(3)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

They were fun but it took a lot (and I mean a lot) of time to put together and I just haven't had time to spare the last few years. Additionally, the "pickings" have dropped off quite a bit the last few years as the forum has really quieted down.

04-29-15  01:52pm

Reply
58
Visit Team Skeet

Team Skeet
(3)
Reply of Khan's Reply

Mmmm. Just cleaned out my cache and clicked on the TBP link for the $10 monthly trial and I just get a dead page link. Maybe something wrong with my browser or something else.

04-29-15  11:50am

Reply
59
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

About the only way to get by in the 21st century without wifi is to live alone, own one computer, don't use a smart phone and don't have a tablet ... which basically means you don't live in the 21st century.

03-28-15  12:43pm

Reply
60
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(6)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

The credit system is basically worthless as it currently works. You get about 300 loyalty credits for a months membership and that allows you to buy one scene "forever" if you register your email with them. Guess I prefer the concept of "forever" meaning what I download and store myself. Currently, you can't use them to offset the cost of a membership.

03-08-15  05:32pm

Reply
61
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
Reply of Dorsai6's Reply

Cool. Good to know for future reference.

03-08-15  05:28pm

Reply
62
Visit Lez Cuties

Lez Cuties
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment

I just finished a subscription to 21sextury and while I spent very little time on this site it did look like they had some new content and that it updated every few weeks. How much is actually new? I can't say for sure.

03-04-15  12:59pm

Reply
63
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Porn is sort of like a restaurant in that once the entree breaks the $30 barrier you start to lose the customers. I'm a cheap bastard so even the $30 limit is high for me but that doesn't mean there isn't great stuff or niche stuff above that line.

03-04-15  12:58pm

Reply
64
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I never do the "Free" trials with the exception of DDF that no longer offers them. I have done some $1 trials in the past but only if they're through a reputable billing company and the terms and conditions make it clear that I got time to cancel before the trial ends. In other words, look before you leap.

02-28-15  01:08pm

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I would say some combination of "all of the above". Dimensions alone don't define HD. Actually, I guess I don't even know what a standardized definition of HD is any more. Too lazy to Google though.

02-06-15  12:36pm

Reply
66
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

Well, I stand corrected. I think the main people here have with this is the word "DRM". Too many bad connotations for us old timers. Given how much personal information we give up to social media and big data every time we fire up our browser, I don't have much of a problem with this any more.

02-01-15  12:32pm

Reply
67
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I hadn't really heard about this before. It makes sense from the production end and doesn't mess with legitimate users so I don't have a real problem with it. My guess, though, is that it's probably easy to defeat the codes or block them if you know what you're looking for.

01-31-15  01:38pm

Reply
68
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

A lot of old stuff that goes also can't legally be reproduced any more because of the all the documentation required now to show consent, age, etc. Also, who really owns the copyright to the old stuff is hard to track down. With porn being relatively cheap to produce I can't see many willing to go the expense and hassle of reclaiming the oldies and then updating them to current acceptable standards.

01-24-15  04:23pm

Reply
69
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Unless you're set on watching your collection on a 60 inch HD tv or monitor then "the biggest" doesn't always make sense.

01-22-15  12:26pm

Reply
70
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

It's just more likely to make me join. It really doesn't affect the score unless the price is an awesome deal or a total ripoff in comparison to what you get.

01-11-15  03:24pm

Reply
71
Visit Twistys Network

Twistys Network
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Reply

I think I'm a bit limited in my response in that my subscription just ended. I know they used to have more content (especially the old stuff) and I think that is now hidden in an "upgrade" feature. I didn't upgrade so I can't say for sure what comes in that package. However, even if I'm right, unless you're concerned about way old content (7 years or longer) then you're probably not affected.

01-10-15  02:00pm

Reply
72
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls
(4)
Reply of EverNight's Reply

Actually they have MP4 downloads now. They're at a lower resolution but they comprise most of the vids I downloaded and tend to look fine.

01-10-15  01:45pm

Reply
73
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Nothing kills a scene worse for me than actors who treat a shoot just like another day at the job or a comedy session.

01-07-15  01:02pm

Comment
74
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)

Navigation Bites

I bit on the $10 per month offer and man am I regretting it. I haven't been here in a few years and boy have things changed (for the worse) under the new management.

Everything is now housed under the twistysnetwork portal. You can select a site and choose pics or vids or both to view. Sh*t immediately goes south after that. The page display only allows for 20 scenes. After that you can only advance 2 pages at a time (big problem with a site this large). Say you're on page 24 and you can click on a scene. After you're done you click the "back" button on your browser; PRESTO, you automatically get taken back to page one (a problem with a Flash driven sites with no internal site "back" and "forward" buttons). Now you get to keep on clicking two pages at a time to get back to the page you were on and repeat ad infinitum, ad nauseum. If you were screening under just pics or just vids it forgets that too. If you were on a particular subsite of Twistys sometimes it forgets that too.

Using the advanced navigation doesn't fix the problem and neither does switching browsers. The url specs in the browser only show that you're on a single page no matter what internal page you might be on so you can't manually override the "back to square one" problem either.

Postscript: The next day I finally figured a work around, you have to right click on a scene and open in a new tab (duh me). Still, why should I have to do this? It doesn't help that their regular search engine is crappola either. The inability to page jump on a site with so much content is still a pain.

12-16-14  07:13pm

Replies (3)
Reply
75
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It all depends on whether your a "pic" or a "vid" collector. As I'm the former, I don't mind extra content in the pics section but it bugs me when the good stuff on the vids don't show up in the pics.

12-12-14  12:45pm


Shown : 51-75 of 781 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.24 seconds.