Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : luv lickn clit (19)  

Feedback:   All (166)  |   Reviews (11)  |   Comments (8)  |   Replies (147)

Other:   Replies Received (68)  |   Trust Ratings (24)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 166 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I think most women have very negative attitudes toward porn, in part perhaps because they have fears that they won't measure up to the generally hot young women who do porn. I think they also reject the notion of casual sex that is often times implied by porn. In addition, I have only rarely encountered women who actually enjoy watching porn. Romance novels are their "porn", and most women I've known love reading them.

05-09-13  08:01am

Reply
27
Visit Nubile Films

Nubile Films
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Great review Rearadmiral! Is this site related in any way to Nubiles.net-the teen mega site?

05-08-13  04:51pm

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Lionheart's Poll

Some are hot, some are not, but overall its very uncommon, so really a non-issue for me.

05-07-13  12:56am

Reply
29
Visit All Panty Pass

All Panty Pass
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Thanks for the positive comments everyone! I took a few notes before I wrote this one. I considered doing separate reviews of the sites, but they are very similar and many of them are quite small.

05-03-13  05:38pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I do a lot of news reading and general researching stuff online, but there's nothing like a good old fashioned book.

05-03-13  05:36pm

Review
31
Visit All Panty Pass

All Panty Pass
(1)

68.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: --The 15 different sites on this network try to cover all the sub-niches of panty fetish (up-skirt, young girls, shiny panties, UK panties, etc).

--All but one of the sites have both photos and videos.

--Site navigation is simple, in part because there is not a huge amount of content.

--Some of the material is pretty good--in particular some of the photo sets on Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys

--The flash player gets the job done.

--Photosets have zip files, and are small and download fast (usually in seconds).
Cons: --One of the biggest problems I had with this site was the generally low resolution of the material, with photos ranging from 900 to 1280 pixels on the long dimension, and as many as one third of the videos below 640 x 480 resolution.

--Many of the photo sets and videos are named using a name that consists only of numbers and letters (e.g. 008ch). To make matters worse, on many of the sites, the models don't even have names. There are no model pages with links to all of a model's sets and videos--you have to find them among the single list of photo sets and/or videos.

--This is archival material that is really starting to show its age (older hairstyles, etc).

--Roughly 50% of the material is non-nude or non-fully-nude.

--The sites have updates, but the total number of photo sets and videos doesn't change, so it certainly appears that they use some type of content rotation system.
Bottom Line: As a guy who loves to see a hot girl in a sexy pair of panties, I am often disappointed by the lack of attention paid to them on many standard softcore porn sites. So I decided to look around and join a panty site. I don't really like the British approach to "knickers", so I settled on All Panty Pass.

This is a collection of 15 individual sites, each of which focuses on a different sub-niche of panties. The sites are listed below, each followed by 2 numbers: the first being the number of photo sets they had when I was a member, and the second being the number of videos they had (my membership expired about a month ago).

Cute Panty Girls 925/154
Panty Honeys 267/66
Panties Next Door 281/44
Legwear Passion 159/63
Shiny Knickers 152/14
Best Nylon Girls 106/46
Jeans and Panties 101/101
90s Panties 128/0
Wet Panty Lickers 82/74
Skirts and Panties 54/42
Kitty's Panties 58/53
Panty Girls UK 47/23
Only Shiny 36/27
Sexy Soccer Panties 32/32
Virtual Panty Girls 151/22

I'll just cut to the chase and say that the site was really disappointing. This is archival material that is starting to show its age. Overall photo/video resolution is low, the file naming system and lack of model names is ridiculous, and the general quality of the panty content is good but not great.

The first thing I discovered when I entered the site and went to Panty Honeys was that a significant number of videos are low resolution. The first 3 I clicked on were all 320 by 240--so small as to be basically worthless. Just as I was starting to think I had been totally screwed, I clicked on one that was 640 by 480. The resolution of the videos is actually quite variable (Panty Honeys had 10 different resolutions among the 66 videos), both within an individual site, and across sites. The best site for video was Jeans and Panties, where they were all 720p. Most of the sites have some 720p, but the amount varies. The 2 biggest sites (Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys) each had a significant number of videos that were below 640 by 480 (20 out 66 on Panty Honeys). The videos are all downloadable with no DRM. The flash player works well and let's you scan through quickly.

The photo sets are the best feature of the sites. They are generally well lit and focused. However, the resolution is low (usually 1280 or 1024 pixels on the long dimension), and many are non-nude. Because of the small size, many zip files are less than 10 MB, and download within seconds.

The weirdest site was the Virtual Panty Girls, which consists of animated photo sets and a few animated videos. It must have taken a lot of time to create this material, but I didn't find it erotic at all.

Navigation is simple, and each of the sites has the same layout. The opening page shows the latest updates and upcoming updates, and has links to pages for all photo sets and all videos. When you go to the photo or video pages, there is a row of thumbnails across the top for individual photo sets or videos (varying from about 5 to 9 thunbnails). There is also a list of number links for the next page of photoset/video thumbnails. Because there are so few thumbnails on each page, there are more pages and clicking than there need to be. Each site also has a link to the main All Panty Pass page, which has links to the individual sites.

As noted above, many of the models are not given a name, and there are no model pages where you can find all of girl's photo sets and videos on each site. This along with the number/letter filenames means that once you've downloaded the material to your hard drive, you really don't know what is what. Forget about a search feature on the sites and network...they don't have one.

About one-third to one-half of the material is non-nude, or non-fully nude. Even though the focus is panties, I do want to see what's underneath, so this was very disappointing.

With the low resolution, aging material, and plain Jane site navigation, the site has the look and feel of a site that is 10 years old. The price was $21 and change for a month, and while I didn't feel screwed, I think they would generate more revenue if they lowered that to $10 or $15 a month.

Bottom Line: There is some content here worth downloading, but the cons outweigh the pros, and I find it difficult to recommend this site.

05-02-13  05:39pm

Replies (4)
Reply
32
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Yeah Drooler, its really annoying how some sites like CNN.com have pop-ups (pop-up fucking anyway) that defeat any blocker I've tried!

05-01-13  09:31pm

Comment
33
Visit Bikini Riot

Bikini Riot
(1)

First impressions of Bikini Riot

I just joined Bikini Riot, and really like the site so far! Lots of gorgeous women in sexy bikinis! The photos and videos look great--vids are 720p HD (last couple of years), and both photos and videos are well done. Site navigation is simple and intuitive. On the negative side, there's too many fake boobs for my taste, the update frequency is a bit low (though there is a lot of archived material), the high res pics are only 2000 pixel on the long dimension, and the videos are basically the same thing every time. But that's really not bad when the girls and their bikinis are so hot! I haven't even gotten to the 2 bonus sites yet. I'll post a review in 2 or 3 weeks.

04-29-13  03:41pm

Replies (1)
Reply
34
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(3)
Reply of ex1am's Comment

Ouch!!! That is so wrong!!!

04-29-13  03:31pm

Reply
35
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Barefoot for me. I have never understood the heels fetish! They do nothing for me.

04-29-13  08:03am

Reply
36
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams
(1)
Reply of Dracula's Comment

Dracula, if you did sign up, please do a review. It's been a long long time since I was there.

04-27-13  09:36pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

It has run the gamut for me...some fast helpful responses, and I've also been ignored a couple of times too.

04-27-13  09:31pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I haven't really seen any that would make me seriously question their legality. I do pass over models that are dressed in such a way or posed on sets that are designed to make them look under age (stuffed animals, etc). Early 20s is my preferred age for models--I think that is the peak of a woman's physical beauty.

04-26-13  09:25pm

Reply
39
N/A Reply of plan b's Poll

I grew up a Saints and LSU fan, and feel fortunate that both teams have won a championship in recent years.

04-23-13  09:10am

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I think some areas will have stricter laws, but the industry will always find ways around them. There's just too much money to be made.

04-22-13  11:50am

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes, especially if there are some of my favs in the archives. But I wouldn't stick around if its not updating.

04-19-13  05:25am

Reply
42
N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

I've taken the plunge a few times, and learned the hard way that a good review is better than any free tour.

04-17-13  11:07pm

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Occasionally I come accross a photo set where I will do some spot airbrushing myself, but it's usually cleaning up razor burn in a model's pubic area. That can sometimes be distracting.

04-15-13  07:38pm

Reply
44
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

There aren't many girls who can take a fist and truly enjoy it. Over the years, I've only seen a few good fisting scenes. I am definitely not a fan of the extreme insertions niche. I'd much rather just see the girl cum--and in almost all cases that does not involve a fist in her pussy.

04-13-13  09:19am

Reply
45
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I picked "other" because what I really look for is a complete gallery of all the models, with a thumbnail (or more) of each photo set and video she has on the site. After that, I like to see a few photo and video samples to get an idea of the site's style. And of course, the girls have to be hot--hopefully including several of my favs.

04-11-13  10:19pm

Reply
46
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

Yes they did turboshaft, but the movie had robots that you could have sex with.

04-09-13  06:33am

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes, the value is important. A $30 a month site needs to have what I want. I cut a little slack to less expensive sites.

04-09-13  06:29am

Reply
48
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

We are way more than 10 years out, but the idea of a highly realistic sex robot is intriguing! Anyone remember Westworld?

04-07-13  06:43am

Reply
49
Visit Eva's Garden

Eva's Garden
(1)
Reply of Drooler's Comment

I hope they don't go under--I have them on my list of sites to join. Maybe if they take a break from updating, they can come back from the brink.

04-05-13  10:23pm

Reply
50
N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

A few websites have good tours, but many don't. That's why I luv this site!

04-05-13  08:57pm


Shown : 26-50 of 166 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.9 seconds.