Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : skippy (36)  

Feedback:   All (83)  |   Reviews (21)  |   Comments (9)  |   Replies (53)

Other:   Replies Received (53)  |   Trust Ratings (23)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 83 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm not into pregnant, but there are a few scenes where girls in shape, but lactating. That's kind of interesting.

12-08-12  10:36am

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

In college. Half the frat house was watching as we were on a beach weekend... I saw one or two as they walked by, but didn't know they were ALL watching until we were done and I don't think she ever knew.

12-08-12  10:30am

Reply
53
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Ditto for me. The MA network is tops, although you don't get access to all of the sites without paying extra.

12-08-12  10:25am

Reply
54
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

Depends on your definition of gay site. If gay means men only, then no. If ALSSCAN is a gay site (lesbian), then yes.

12-08-12  10:22am

Reply
55
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

All of the above.

12-08-12  10:17am

Reply
56
N/A Reply of OneMan's Poll

My answer is F: too much fake grunting, groaning and moaning.

12-08-12  10:10am

Reply
57
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I never do the live webcam thing but once I was on Met Art and saw a girl named Mila, one of my all time favorite models, in an active webcam. I got into a 1 on 1 with her. She was everything I imagined she would be and the interaction was terrific! 10 minutes and $50 later (including tip) I was the happiest guy on earth. That will be the only time....probably...

12-08-12  09:59am

Reply
58
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Kind of a gap there. I download more than 10 but less than 50.

12-08-12  09:55am

Reply
59
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I've known several dancers and a handful of pornstars. I WOULD marry a dancer (most of the ones I knew were financing their educations and got out). I would NOT marry a pornstar. The problem is that literally all of the pornstars I've known have been drawn into pornography from dancing, then nude modeling, then porn. Somewhere around doing porn, the sense of normal gets really messed up. The girls are highly influenced by the folks around them, most of which have a twisted sense of what normal is. The result is implants and enhancements, extreme acts, and other things that the girl might not normally do. And that is just the external influences. Layer on the childhood background some of the girls have which say it is OK to do porn. Something tells me conversations with her dad would not be particularly normal. Then there's the psychology of the girl herself. Ever heard of polyamorous? It is a very poorly understood psychological condition of a person who can't love just one other person. It is one of the effects...or maybe one of the motivators behind many pornstars.
I'm not saying there aren't a few pornstars out there with terrific, perfectly normal personalities. What I am saying is that I would find it difficult to maintain common values with most pornstars, which is a primary basis behind marraige, isn't it?
I am very happily married. Porn is a release and a fantasy. Why screw that up?


12-08-12  09:38am

Reply
60
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Two words...CROSS SELLING! I have unchecked all the boxes, only to find them mysteriously rechecked after something like a mistyped CC was corrected. Once or twice I didn't notice until processing was complete. NOTHING misses me off more than that and I've blasted several sites because of it.

12-08-12  09:23am

Reply
61
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Hello? King sized bed! Towel off and move to one side or the other!

12-08-12  09:20am

Reply
62
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

I did not vote on this one since the answer "in whatever location is the least obtrusive" was not an answer. Danni's hard drive had a huge logo but most of the time they put it in whatever corner worked best. Most of th esites I prefer don't have them.

12-08-12  09:17am

Reply
63
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

You really need an "Other" here. For me it is the whole package, including the girl, set, quality of photography, etc. So it is a 1x1x1x1 thing where something missing(a 0)= 0.

12-08-12  09:13am

Reply
64
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

With most girls, a little makeup is a good thing. I absolutely can't stand the bright color or rainbow eye shadow common in Eastern European countries. Makes a girl look like a clown.

12-08-12  09:09am

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

See my response under "TVs" poll. Including game consoles and computers, I have 12. Never watched a blu-ray porn, though. :-(

12-08-12  09:07am

Reply
66
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

If I find a model particularly attractive, I will move all her stuff into my OMG folder, regardless of name. There are about 10 girls in there now out of about 200,000.

12-08-12  09:04am

Reply
67
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I don't really have TVs. I have A/V setups in 3 rooms with A/V recievers, Tivos, stream-capable Blu-Ray players, and game consoles. One setup is a dedicated A/V room with the setup bove, plus a PC, a projector and 12 foot projection screen.

The problem with TV and TV related services is that they are too clean. I can get PPV porn on any hotel TV, but not in my own home because Amazon and the other mainstream vendors won't carry it. Huge, huge, HUGE market opportunity when you consider what VCRs did for the industry.


12-08-12  08:57am

Reply
68
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Eh, it's more about the ability of the photography team than the location. Well..Although outdoors is usually fine, I'm not thrilled with the girl in the woods shoots where she pretends there is no photographer present or is partially hidden behind a tree.
A good photographer with a good model, good technique and a good demeaner with that model can successfully shoot anywhere.


12-08-12  08:45am

Reply
69
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I was in Vegas several years ago for business and the hotel was hosting some kind of porn convention. Can't recall what it was...maybe Vivid. Everybody had lanyards and badges, but I was able to walk right in because I had a lanyard and badge from my covention...nobody really looks at the things. Lots of toys, dolls, porn stars, etc. Remember Raquel Darrian? She was there. That pegs the timeframe. '92 maybe?

12-08-12  08:35am

Reply
70
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I am all for legalization and taxation at both the state and federal level. It would help the economy and allow the DEA to go after the heavy hitters dealing with the really bad stuff. Bot...

The only concern I have is the impact this would have on kids. For drinking, laws are strict and the impact of small amounts of alcohal on the development of kids brains is generally minimal (as proven by studies and by European countries that allow kids to drink). Don't bash me, but I am not convinced that pot does not have an impact on the development of young brains. As a kid in the 1970's I was 11 when I started smokong pot and was pretty much done with it by college. I do think it had an adverse affect on me. As a kid, I did not delineate much between pot and marginally more dangerous drugs like coke (the snorting kind back then, thank god), speed and quaaludes. (Adults, with a more developed sense of reason, can probably understand the difference and not leap to other drugs.) I also think legalization might make it easier for kids to get weed, especially if it were a common thing around the house (purses, top drawers, etc). Alcohol laws prevent an adult from giving alcahol to a minor, but do not prohibit kids from raiding the liquor cabinet and do not encourage parents to lock up the booze. And as somebody above mentioned, unlike alcohol, second hand pot smoke is still effective at giving somebody, kids included, a buzz.
So, although I'm in favor of it, there would need to be several safeguards in place that I'm not sure are there yet. Some combination of both alcahol and tobacco policies would need to be implemented.


12-08-12  07:07am

Reply
71
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

The only non-digital I have could be considered collector stuff, "Oh God, She's Nude!" and similar, hidden away in a dusty box I last saw about a year ago. The best of my digital stuff, dating back more than 15 years now, is on a protected hard drive on one of 3 computers in the man cave. Older stuff and archives are on protected external drives stored away. Like any data, you can't exactly call it valuable, but it is worth backing up because it would be very expensive or impossible to replace.

Next good question: Do people have backups?


12-07-12  11:25pm

Reply
72
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

You mean the walk around in body paint shoots? They were Awesome!

11-30-12  09:47pm

Comment
73
Visit The GF Network

The GF Network
(0)

Unsolicited Spam is never good....

I thought I'd write a comment here just in case anyone thinks no review means this site might be worth it. In this case it isn't.
I am constantly getting unidentified anonymous spam from this network. Anonymous spam....the worst possible kind. I've joined enough sites to know that when a legitimate site emails you, there is a link back to the site and there is an option to unsubscribe. Not with these emails. They are completely anonymous and say something like "(your name here), you won't believe this." Never, ever trust a solicitation to an adult site that does not adhere to ethical business practices. "Ethical" in this case means they properly identify who they are, what they want and how you can tell them to buzz off if you want to.

Now...about the site. At some point, I was a little curious about "Watch my Girlfriend" and another site in this network, so I joined. $30 totally and completely wasted. The "Network" recycles many of the same images across many sites. A significant number of images (look closely at a few on the Sluts with Phones teaseer page) are NOT EVEN REAL PHOTOS! They are graphics! Many others are photoshopped. Many of the images were....obtained elsewhere and reposted. And the vast majority of them are not nude. There are no regular releases of new material and the material that is there is not organized with dates. What you get is a very small collection of crappy images. The ones on the teaser page are the best of the bunch. The rest are "user submissions" or something to that effect. Some of th esites doen't seem to update at all.

Although the concept seems interesting, I am practically certain that the only objective of this network is to hit-and run with your wallet. There are a lot of really excellent sites that will set you back far less than this garbage. You generally can't go wrong with the high scoring sites reviewed here at PU.

Just stay away from this one. SO not worth it.

Oh, and you PU editors, if you want to do a real community service, let me know and I'll put up the money for a subscription to this network so you can give it a real review.

11-30-12  09:30pm

Replies (0)
Comment
74
Visit Sluts With Phones

Sluts With Phones
(0)

Unsolicited Spam is never good....

I thought I'd write a comment here just in case anyone thinks no review means this site might be worth it. In this case it isn't.
I am constantly getting unidentified anonymous spam from this site and others in this network. Anonymous spam....the worst possible kind. I've joined enough sites to know that when a legitimate site emails you, there is a link back to the site and there is an option to unsubscribe. Not with these emails. They are completely anonymous and say something like "(your name here), you won't believe this." Never, ever trust a solicitation to an adult site that does not adhere to ethical business practices. "Ethical" in this case means they properly identify who they are, what they want and how you can tell them to buzz off if you want to.

Now...about the site. At some point, I was a little curious about "Watch my Girlfriend" and another site in this network, so I joined. $30 totally and completely wasted. The "Network" recycles many of the same images across many sites. A significant number of images (look closely at a few on the Sluts with Phones teaseer page) are NOT EVEN REAL PHOTOS! Many are photoshopped. Many of the images were....obtained elsewhere and reposted. And the vast majority of them are not nude. There are no regular releases of new material and the material that is there is not organized with dates. What you get is a very small collection of crappy images. The ones on the teaser page are the best of the bunch. The rest are "user submissions" or somthing to that effect.

Although the concept seems interesting, I am practically certain that the only objective of this network is to hit-and run with your wallet. There are a lot of really excellent sites that will set you back far less than this garbage. You generally can't go wrong with the high scoring sites reviewed here at PU.

Just stay away from this one. SO not worth it.

11-30-12  09:10pm

Replies (0)
Reply
75
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

To each his/her own, I guess. When I look at a beautiful girl on a good site, at least one thought I have is how nice it would be to go down on her until she cums and says stop. But after seeimg a few shots of peeing, that thought vanishes. Now..on the other hand...I have been told that one of the reasons there is soo much pee on the lesbian sites is because the photographers are tellig the girls to imagine themselves peeing on the tens of thousands of guys who are getting off seeing them naked. So if you see a girl peeing, she was probably fantasizing about peeing on YOU!

09-23-12  04:19pm


Shown : 51-75 of 83 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.08 seconds.