Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : skippy (42)  

Feedback:   All (103)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (12)  |   Replies (67)

Other:   Replies Received (66)  |   Trust Ratings (23)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 66 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Drooler: (skippy's Reply)

Lorena and Marketa (Belonoha) are other good examples. Thanks. Cassidy Raye comes to mind, too.

09-14-14  09:26am

Reply
2
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
Reply of skippy's Comment from brotherlove:

It's actually changed a whole lot since just last year 2012. Daily updates have been reduced from 3 photo sets and 2 videos to 1 of each. Power search was removed at least a year ago. They no longer listen to user comments and eliminated the forum. Pretty much they no longer interact with customers. They don't shoot any European models located in Europe anymore any such content was shot at least 6 months ago. Tammy Sands, one of the best photographers they used no longer shoots for them. Holly Randall, the other best photographer they used rarely shoots for them anymore. They have started using some crappier photographers to make up for it. Oh and they now fix the ratings and supposedly are dumping the treat of the year contest after the fallout of fixing this years contest.

They're now purely driven by money and don't give a lick about customer satisfaction or new content quality. Download historical content but much of the new stuff is disappointing.


09-11-14  08:49pm

Reply
3
Visit POVD

POVD
(1)
REPLY TO #5 from frank nasty: (skippy's Reply)

So to answer my own question the newer videos are 1080p starting with the Kacey Lane scene. Like skippy says some of these videos still aren't great so far as quality goes, but others are. More recently all the videos have been high quality, still not the best quality by far but still a pretty good 1080p, so hopefully they have got it together now. Honestly only about 3 videos are not up to par since the 1080 switch. The updates are pretty consistent, about twice a week. I would have to say the strongest aspect of this site is the performers. There are some really hot ones here and it is definitely worth a look if you are a fan of pov. I am still not happy about them trying to fool people into thinking they were getting the highest quality 1080p videos when they were getting 720, or the blatant lack of consumer support. If they can keep it going like they have been I think they have a strong chance of becoming one of the best POV sites out there. Check it out.

09-03-14  01:17am

Reply
4
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review from greg909:

One of the things that really annoys me about Femjoy is that the thumbnails they post to represent each set is VERY misleading. Many of the sets are poorly lit, not very sharp, have the wrong color balance, and the model is miles away from the camera. Yet the editors on Femjoy take the best shot in the set (there's usually only one that's any good) and crop it significantly to look like the model is much closer. Then they pump up the light levels (which they don't do for the photos themselves) and adjust the color to a more accurate balance. As a result, the set's thumbnail looks very inviting, but you're really disappointed when you see the set itself. Don't be misled by their Updates page -- the actual content is rarely like it.

09-01-14  05:09pm

Reply
5
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review from Cybertoad:

Fantastic review, gees I am not huge softcore but you may have convinced me to join.

08-31-14  08:26am

Reply
6
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review from rearadmiral:

Great review. Sites like this aren't usually on my radar as I prefer hardcore, but I do occasionally subscribe to softcore sites like this and I always enjoy them. Thanks for providing the information that there are a lot of outdoor scenes and scenes where the video is shot at the same time as the photo shoot. I'm a big fan of both of those. I suspect that I'll check this site out based on your review.

08-30-14  03:15pm

Reply
7
Visit Eternal Desire

Eternal Desire
(0)
Reply of skippy's Comment from Khan:

I can't speak to discount offers you've seen elsewhere, but ...

Spot checking, I still show the special discounted price we list for this site.

Try clearing your cache and any cookies you have associated with the site and then revisiting directly from one of our links.


08-10-14  02:17pm

Reply
8
N/A REPLY TO #10 from Drooler: (skippy's Reply)

ROFL, that was well-said.

08-10-14  11:02am

Reply
9
Visit POVD

POVD
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review from frank nasty:

So I have had mixed experiences with povD in the past. When I first joined in Jan 2014 It seemed very cool. I was very impressed with the shooting style. It seems like pov where mostly the entire female is visible on screen is quite rare. Idk why this is, just butt cheeks or boobs or just a face on screen by themselves is not appealing to me as a viewer... I digress...
The first 10 or so scenes are hot. Great performers, sets, shooting, and high quality video resolution. I was happy, I thought that I finally found a credible POV site that would update regularly.
now for the second month. I was very excited to see Janice G. there but I was quickly disappointed to find the video quality was horrible. Not offered in 1080p, only 720p and the pixelization was plentiful. I mean this was not even good 720p; it was not clear video, it was dark and the color was way off. I don't see how they can get away with saying "highest quality video on the net" and not even offer a quality 720p or 1080p, much less 4K (which most would argue to be the highest mainstream quality these days). It is clearly not the highest quality.
There was also the issue of an oversized watermark that covered 1/4 the screen which included the pussy, but at least that got taken care of, eventually.
I have also noticed that they have started "recycling" many of the girls now. D.Carter is in 4 different scenes and there aren't that many vids on the site yet ...not cool. I mean maybe if they had her in different costumes or something to switch it up I would say "its cool" ...but its not

This has been my experience on povD.com


My main question to you is are the videos looking better yet? I mean are they back to 1080p? and at what update/girl did the 1080 start back up on? Any 4K yet?
Are there any other POV sites you know of that offer the full body view I am looking for? I have checked out many and so far all I really liked are povd, P.north.com, & HW101. The latter 2 sites are good but hardly update. HW101 over at Naughty A. is def worth a look if u like this style and haven't seen it.
I be very happy if one of these sites could offer up an ebony babe in full body pov. If you know where I could get a scene like this let a bro know. I would greatly appreciate the heads up, and thank you for any info you may provide.

Good day & good fapping 2u.


07-28-14  02:36am

Reply
10
Visit Babes Network.com

Babes Network.com
(7)
Reply of skippy's Review from Monahan:

Thanks for a great review. The Babes site was one of the very first sites I joined and it was good (not great) at the time.

Your comparison, for example, to Met Art is perfect as a reason why Babes goes off my short term join list. I like the technical excellence of Met Art but I literally fell asleep watching one of their videos last year when I was still a member (boring video, but a sip of Glenlivit scotch contributed to my drowsiness. I don't think I've ever dozed off watching a porn video.

I've evaluated the "lifetime" deal and did the match as you did. Unless you stay a member of a site for an extended period it's not a deal by any stretch of the imagination.


06-14-14  05:46pm

Reply
11
Visit POVD

POVD
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review from host2626:

IIRC, all their videos have this fish lens distorted effect, like the ones in Spizoo's PornGoesPro. This "House of Mirrors" effect doesn't do it for me, zero excitement.

I understand that making proper POV is difficult. Even more so when you are a cheapass wanting to do it alone.

So either you do it with a normal lens, and convince your viewers who never had sex that it's exactly how it goes, you either see the closeup of her face or a closeup of your dick as if your eyes were popping out of your navel. The sad thing is that they believe it.

Or you use a fish eye lens to widen the field of view, thus completely distorting her body. Neither of this is exciting for me, and the proper way to do it, by having someone else hold the camera a bit higher that the guy's head, is almost never used.

It seems that mostly it's some guy wanting to get laid, have us pay for it, and make a living out of it. Understandable, I'd do the same :). Why pay a second guy to hold the camera, customers will swallow any crap. Some even think that it's normal to have camera shake, your pelvis is in motion after all and all that. No it's not, IRL your eyes are not fixed in their orbits, they move by themselves so your image is stable. There is no excuse for shaky cam, as there is none for any Hall of Mirror porn.

Anyway, /rant off, sorry. I wish my search for a proper POV site was over. Tired of having to content myself with 5 seconds of non-crappy footage in one video out of 10.


05-22-14  09:40pm

Reply
12
Visit POVD

POVD
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review from rearadmiral:

Great review. I like the level of detail you provided and the rationale behind some of your comments. Reviews like this make PornUsers a valuable tool.

05-19-14  01:10pm

Reply
13
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(2)
Reply of skippy's Comment from Monahan:

I agree with your point and will add another element.

I, as you, would go for the cost per day bargains of 1 year memberships. But when new (to me) sites showed up on PU I would sign up for one month with the idea of going for the 1 year deals if I liked the site.

That tendency created a serious overload where I had 3 sites at once with 1 year memberships and found that I was unable to take advantage of them all (the time aspect). In fact I discovered that I would access one of those sites only once or twice a month which negated the economic benefits altogether.

Nubiles, however, by their misguided pricing strategy, makes it easy to opt out of signing up for a full year.

These days I will go in steps; one month, three months (if it is cheaper on a daily rate basis) and, after seeing what my visit rate has been during the 3 month membership period, will decide that the annual membership makes sense.


04-27-14  11:22am

Reply
14
Visit Goddess Nudes

Goddess Nudes
(2)
Reply of skippy's Review from TheSquirrel:

Not my sort of thing, but very good descriptive review. Shame there are no videos.

12-02-13  09:42am

Reply
15
Visit Goddess Nudes

Goddess Nudes
(2)
Reply of skippy's Review from graymane:

A review this comprehensive deserves a favorable response.
It certainly cut through any resistance I might harbor.
Only fly in the ointment are the absence of videos.

But hey! I couldn't agree more; at ten bucks you can't go wrong.
Great review, skip. sorry I missed your previous ones.


11-30-13  09:54pm

Reply
16
Visit CL Erotic

CL Erotic
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review from graymane:

Haven't seen you around before .... but having seen this well-written review, I'll be on the lookout for future ones.
Would Be nice to have you visit us in the forum .... we could use your talent.
Thumbs-up!


10-26-13  04:13pm

Reply
17
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
REPLY TO #2 from lk2fireone: (skippy's Reply)

Thanks for the clarification.

It was an empty day, so that is why I posted my comment/reply.

I do think that MetArt is a great site.

I never got a refund from them. But I was never double-billed from them, as far as I know.

Stay well.


09-20-13  02:48am

Reply
18
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
Reply of skippy's Comment from lk2fireone:

I've been a member of MetArt many times in the past. I've also been a member of some of the newer sites in their network.

But I've never gotten a refund from them.

Maybe I should send an email complaining about how they seem to favor some members over others.

I've never even sent them an email to their customer service, that I can remember.

But I agree that MetArt is probably the best site for softcore erotic teen photos on the internet, considering their price, high quality of photosets and models, and massive content.

If there was some way they could improve their videos, I would give them a 100% score. But they seem to be trying to make their videos slightly more erotic.


09-19-13  10:17am

Reply
19
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(4)
Reply of skippy's Comment from lk2fireone:

The offer and its details were posted at the PU site as a reply by the Webmaster to some comment.

The offer was not posted as news at the Diesel Access network, that I could find.

But if the offer does go into effect, that would be an inexpensive way of getting access to all of Diesel Access network and the two WOW sites.


03-05-13  03:53pm

Reply
20
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(4)
Reply of skippy's Comment from lk2fireone:

Read "What happened to the new membership network access" comment by elephant posted to 18 only girls site.

The webmaster stated in a reply several weeks back that there would be a new program giving access to Wow Girls and WOW PORN if you were a member of the Diesel Access network.

I don't recall the exact details.

But he stated in a reply to elephants comment above:

Reply date 2013-03-03


Webmaster Hey guys! Like always, it took a bit more time. The alpha version was not up to my expectations so I sent it back for improvements. I think, it will be released during this week, my best guess it will be Tuesday or Wednesday but again, something may go wrong!

Thank you for your interest!


03-05-13  03:38pm

Reply
21
N/A REPLY TO #20 from RustyJ: (skippy's Reply)

Just timeout and then you need to login again. Some sites seem to kick me out after as little as one hour.

02-22-13  09:19am

Reply
22
N/A REPLY TO #12 from Drooler: (skippy's Reply)

Yeah, there's someone at MPL who does not take criticism very well. I've had an experience or two myself. It's still a great site. It's like eating at a restaurant that is as famous for its food as it is for the churlishness of the hospitality staff.

02-20-13  04:33pm

Reply
23
Visit Katie Fey

Katie Fey
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from PinkPanther: (skippy's Reply)

Ariel's awesome and there is TONS of material on her site. It's oddly organized - you'll find a lot of material under her blog, for instance. It's easy to miss things if you don't click around in all the nooks and crannies.

02-19-13  06:00pm

Reply
24
Visit Katie Fey

Katie Fey
(0)
Reply of skippy's Comment from skippy:

Looks like I need to keep looking around. There is one bonus site that isn't bad called Ariel Rebel. Although I don't recall seeing the girl before, the solo site has Recent updates, decent vidos, etc.

02-18-13  08:55pm

Reply
25
Visit Petites Parisiennes

Petites Parisiennes
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review from gaypornolover:

Thorough review, this seems to be a popular site I'm always seeing it reviewed.

02-18-13  06:35pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 66 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.06 seconds.