Vintage Porn Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Retro Raw (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-it does provide, to an extent, what it says it does...porn videos, mostly from the late 70s and early 80s
-sign-up seemed to be pretty efficient
-cancelling seemed to go OK, too, at least, I hope so.
-downloading was simple and i'd judge it to be pretty fast |
| Cons: |
Here we go:
- as mentioned elsewhere, there is no tagging or search function. You have to pick to DL on the basis of a single screen cap, and a small lo-res image of the (I presume) vhs cover, front and back.
- afore-mentioned images of covers, front and back and low-res...teh zoom fucntion didn't work and saving the pic and trying to zoom it, results in large pixels, long before you can make out faces or read names.
- I found at least two instances where the DL'd clip bore no resemblance to the supposed screen-cap
- many of the screen-caps focus on the parts...you have no idea, who, what face, situation, whatever turns your crank, is in the clip...other than 'parts'
- you can't DL a whole movie. With the selection that's probably not a big deal...but just saying.
- the clips are poorly edited. many, you hit play, and the first thing you see are those parts...maybe later you'll see a face or something.
- ltd selection, and of that selection, lots of Seka and Swedish Erotica. |
| Bottom Line: |
As mentioned in a comment, I was led to this site due to a strong nostalgic pull, having recognized a short clip as being from a magazine i had years and years ago. Curisoity overcame me and I went searching.
I totally agree with other reviews...it's not a great site, with a lot of 'compromises' in important areas, such as navigation and content. Other than fulfilling my specific nostalgic yearning, I don't see a lot of value there.
More than many sites I've visited, it is really quite ludicrous to sell access to such a site on a 'subscription' basis...the content that is there you can peruse and make your choices in an hour or two, and be done. And, whatever else might be said, I don't think that there's a lot of new 'vintage' and 'nostalgic' product to be made or found. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Club Kaitlyn (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
really hot classic pornstar. No DRM, full trial worked for me, good download speeds. |
| Cons: |
not too many videos (less than 50), quality is not real great (its older porn), not even close to all of her movies. No pictures, very amatuerish site |
| Bottom Line: |
Just do the trial membership. You should have not trouble downloading all the content on the website. Don't expect any of her really old content before she got implants. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Vintage Classic Porn (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Nearly 500 videos and 520 phototsets.
-Some pretty hard to find porn.
-You can search by decade or niches.
-Movies can be streamed directly online.
-You can download each movie in low, medium or Hi-resolution. |
| Cons: |
-You can download the videos in 3 possible resolutions but since the original material for each video is often awful then that makes the resolution unimportant.
-They offer a description of content in each video but they have omited the names except maybe for a Betty Page's name.
-Pics are for the most part tiny and quality is pretty bad on most of them. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I can't think of any reason you would want to join this site except if you are a rabid porn collector who has to have anything associated with the word porn.
-The majority of the content is what I'd call stag porn from the pics to the videos. I guess it's nice to know that a site is keeping these historical documents alive but I can't see anyone willing to pay 25$ to get access to it.
-I picked a bordeline score because there is still a lot of content to be found inside.
-In case anyone is wondering. I got access to this site through a special offer. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
