Hairy Women Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. We Are Hairy (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Some hairy models are forthcoming and natural. Many are attractive or beautiful. There is no download limit. Videos are mostly solos, which is fine, and there a fair amount of time is devoted to closeups, which I like. |
| Cons: |
Files have a different name than they appear in at the site. Thus the site might refer throughout to “This Model playing with hairy pussy on bed” but delivers “ThisModel_HiddenPinkPanties”. This, combined with a URL system that disarms cookies, makes it all but impossible to keep track of which files you’ve downloaded and which you haven’t.
Videos plagued by artificial masturbation with lots of sighs and moans: really irritating. Also the site often instructs women to ‘masturbate’ by snaking their hands around their thighs from behind, a move as artificial and labored as it sounds.
Despite assurances to the contrary, downloads break under any Macintosh download manager I’ve tried.
Too few women of color (or age).
Minor- files are named according to some object in the room, not by date, so there’s no sequence to the files, as is the case at a major competitor. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not a naturalistic site, which I prefer, especially for hairy models. If you don't mind very artificial masturbation videos with -lots- of ooooh's and aaaah's for no reason, you'd do fine here.
Hint to somewhat improve your ability to see your download history- delete the nonsense string ahead of "members" in the url and reload before downloading. |
| Respond: |
8 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
|
2. ATK Natural & Hairy (6)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
1) Hair is paramount. If'un you like hair on broads, then here you won't be disappointed.
2) Site boast of having millions of pictures. Well, bully for them. I'd have to say that might be a bit of a stretch.
3) Claims to be 12 times the size of any other hairy site. Does it also mean 12 times the cost?
4) zip files for downloads. Small watermarks on pics, larger on videos. No DRM.
5) Promotion touts of having 1577 models.
Well, I guess if they say so .....
6) 5,549 videos. Could be, but the 30 days I was there they musta been in hiding.
7) Updates appear to roll in as promoted.
8) HD on more recent shoots.
9) Some very pretty gals are in the lineup, European, Asian, Latina and American; predictably, a lotta plain-Jane's are there, too. Then there are those who're are just plain ugly.
10) You have solo, soft core, toy, boy/girl hardcore, and lesbian.
. |
| Cons: |
1) Sometimes I'd corralled a beauty only to suddenly see her wander off somewhere.
2) Poor selection of medias, having WMV pitted against two other unknowns.
3) Streaming went smoothly, however, Buffering was unceasingly long and tedious.
4) From my viewpoint, I thought the video-shoots and directing sorely lacked the quality subscribers deserved.
5)Same-'olé-same-'olé .....what with too many and long closeups, and particularly ones that dwell on the genitalia. I can only assume The guy shooting just falls asleep at his camera. The man must belong to a damed good union.
6) Small watermarks on pics, bigger ones but none obtrusive on videos
7) Maybe it's my lack of electronic wizardry, but I simply couldn't find the combination to opening pics on a full screen. |
| Bottom Line: |
Prepare to stare at a lot of hair.
Hair here, hair there, hair everywhere.
Nary model dare to be hair-bare, and that's fair
(jus' thought I'd throw that in)
I went for this $21 deal because I strongly favor seeing natural hair where it's supposed to be on women. It's sexier, more erotic, and adds that important element of realism to the scenes.
This site does a very good job of giving us that, but sadly, eroticism falls woefully short. For one thing, the girls move around too much. No sooner than I get into a clip than the model jumps up and leaps onto something else. Another erotic spoiler is the over-use of smiles ....I know readers don't share or agree to that, but when a gal is in the throes of sexual release, smiles ought to be minimal.! They're necessary I know, but porn isn't Comedy Central and I just don't find them compatible with serious porn.
Cameramen and directors here tend to follow the same old trend that shooting genital closeups are gold. When, for crying out loud, will these numb-nuts wise up and give us a break, already?..... Thanks to vaginal over-exposure I think I now know more about the female pussies than my x-wife's gynecologist.
In my judgment, I'd recommend this site for all who wants to see hair. Otherwise, it's just plain-old generic porn.
Admittedly, I got a bang-for-my-buck for what I paid, but I don't think I'd opt for thirty. |
| Respond: |
16 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Hot Hairy Honies (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Around 160 scenes with a somewhat erratic update schedule but it looks like generally they get around 2 scenes up per month. The club 69 network gets an update almost daily though.
- As far as I could tell all exclusive content, a lot of interracial sex with a black male model and mostly European models (some French some Russian good mix)
- All scenes have images but no zip and the quality is only medium (around 525px × 700) They do offer a slideshow option on the site that works moderately well.
- The site does deliver on the hairy promise, all models look very natural
- A mix of models, some mature women, some more overweight girls and several skinny young looking girls. Overall the site seems focused on natural looking women, pretty minimal make-up, not the most flattering light, and pretty standard action
- A lot of stockings, high heels and corsets.
- Good download speeds, no log-outs, no issues streaming content. |
| Cons: |
- All videos are only 640x400 resolution, with some less than ideal camera angles (they seem to really like to film stuff sideways here) and rather basic light.
- No real search options. While they provide a search bar looking even for basic stuff like mature or BBW doesn't return anything. They really need a better tagging or content filtering system.
- While it's nice to see a mix of natural looking women, the site is too disorganized. There are 18 yo looking girls as well as very mature MILFS on the same page. It's hard to find the kind of model you're in the mood for.
- Almost all scenes have b/g sex, no anal, no group sex, very little solo or lesbian action. Some older scenes have a bit of a story to them while recent ones are pretty much just gonzo sex that can get a bit boring. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site not really because of the hairy aspect as much because of the promise of pretty spectacular creampies and extensive use of corsets and stockings on natural almost amateur looking girls.
On both accounts the site delivers pretty well. All scenes I looked at ended with a creampie or the guy cumming oh her vagina, a nice change to the pretty standard facial at the end of most porn clips.
Also the vast majority of scenes start with the girls in some sort of corset/ bodystocking and a lot of them keep it on the entire time, making for some pretty hot, almost clothed sex scenes.
That being said the technical quality of the videos killed the mood for me. You only get one download option as wmv at 640x400 or you can stream the same quality scene as a flash movie. Even worse the scenes are often not lighted well so you get very dark zoom on the woman's vagina, considering all the girls are hairy/ natural looking and the male model is often black good luck seeing what is going on in the dim lights.
Another disappointment was the lack of a good search option. There is no real way to separate the younger looking models from the older ones. There is no way to select only the handful of lesbian scenes and good luck finding all scenes where the girl does deep-throat.
One telling aspect about the site's technical quality is the fact that the copyright at the bottom of the pages say "materials are © 2009" which is probably the last year the websites were updated.
Bad webdesign, bad video quality, but decent looking models (if you like natural/ amateur looking girls) and pretty okay action.
The one reason I say pretty okay action despite the good cumshots and outfits is that oftentimes the camera work is bizzare. They focus too much on close-ups with several scenes not even showing the girls face until 4-5 minutes into the scene. There are also a lot of strange cuts, one moment she is giving the guy head, the next they are having sex, no transition just a rather strange jump. Add to this tons of side angles and you have some rather odd video choices.
To make things a bit more complicated there are several scenes where this doesn't really apply, the lights are better and the angles less extreme, leading me to believe that they get the content from several directors. However there is no way to tell what is what. Better content tags would have really been helpful here.
The bottomline is that I enjoyed about 30% of the content on the site and the rest of the network did offer some nice action with mature women, but overall the experience was rather disappointing. Higher resolutions and a more modern web design are absolutely necessary for this site, until they make these changes I'd only recommend this to hardcore fans of natural looking women. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
