Squirting Pussy Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Flower Tucci (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of good network
Has same model in all videos, hence the name
Fair price, $25...only because of network
Extremely easy, clean navigation
Site does not require daily log in
A lot of hardcore and multiple girl scenes
Photos have zips
Videos are long |
| Cons: |
DOWNLOAD LIMIT, same as rest of network
NO LONGER UPDATING, what you see is what you get
Bit rates on videos needs improvement
Photos are of a small size
Not a lot of content
Could use more of the aspects of a model site |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is really just a bonus to add to the rest of the network. Unless you really have a thing for Flower Tucci this site does not support its command of $25 a month. Hell with the 15 movie per day limit it would only take you 2 days to download the 28 videos.
The 28 videos are about 50 minutes a piece at 1.2 MBit/s. This quality could use some work, but I would not expect to see anything since they are not even updating. It would take 10.7 GB of your hard drive to get the videos and 1.03 GB to get the zipped photo sets.
The content of the scenes is nice though. They also include some very attractive women for group action. Many times there is three women including Flower.
Of course, Flower herself is a rather good looking woman. So I see absolutely no issue in seeing her in every scene.
Every scene is hardcore, which is good and bad. I know a lot of people like hardcore, and I do too. But, I do like to see some pure lesbian videos especially when it is a site dedicated to a specif model. Or perhaps a solo scene or two.
The site lost points mostly because it is not big enough and it is not updating. I do not hold this against the network though. I understand it is pretty hard to update a specific model site if she does not come back for anymore shoots. The site would get an 85 if it were larger and at least still updating.
It is certainly worth a look at, but mostly on as a secondary to other sites on the network. |
| Respond: |
6 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Squirting Files (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Squirting is hot
-Some of the classics (Cytherea, Flower Tucci...) are there
-The quality is good |
| Cons: |
-Very few videos
-Very pricy for the content
-Slow updates (chunked video system)
-Few extras |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm a member of this site thanks to the loyalty bonus membership offered by Sweetsophiemoone.com. And if I weren't, I mean, if I had paid 29$ or more to enter this site, I would be very pissed off right now. I mean, yes, there are some squirting videos and pictures, with some of the most famous squirting actresses (Cytherea is the queen at that), but that's it. The collection includes less than 30 videos, there are no other extras, and you will have to wait for over a week if you want to see a full new video set.
If you are dying to see new squirting sets, or if you are a millionaire who doesn't care about money, then you may as well join, and you will find some quality content; but if you, like me and like almost everybody else, have to carefully choose which sites you become a member of, then don't choose this one.
Follow-Up:
Apparently the site is not being updated any more: no new updates since July 2007, and no news for at least more than a month. Do not join this site unless you don't mind it being a zombie! |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Squirt Bukkake (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-lots and lots of squirts
-unique content
-can download in mpg, and wmv high and low. Mpg is 1300k, 400x300 and wmv is 1100k 448x33
- you actually get to see cytherea squirted on for a change
-access to 45 other sites with meat pass
-the girls being squirted on are attractive such as cytherea, ashley blue, Nikki Nievez, Crystal Heart, Linsay Lane, Julie Knight, and other porstars
-vid caps for every video
-simple navigation |
| Cons: |
-no full scene download
-there are no real orgasms, everything’s so fake
-the high res pics are not that good
-only 26 scenes
-updates only every 2 weeks sometimes even longer
-many of the squirtes are not attractive
-streaming videos look poor and load slow |
| Bottom Line: |
- the site started 12/07/2006 last update was 7/27/2007
-The videos contain a huge group of girls who like gang up on a girl or guy( usually girl) and start walking over them fingering themselves then squirting all over there face. They do it one by one till they all have a shot, some do it multiple times and the group cheers on each girl. Its very unique and I never seen anything like this. The reality of the squirt is very questionable. This stuff has to be fake, the girls like put there finger in thier cunt and like 2 seconds later, loads of clear liquid come shooting out. They make it seem so easy and there is rarely any build up to each squirt. Most people couldn’t even pee as much as some squirt on here. My guess is each girl sticks a hose up her pussy, fill it up with water, and then when its time to go they squirt it out. Ive seen girls on here just rub there pussy lips and a big load comes out. Sometimes they even just show a girls pussy squirting cum without even showing them, and it jumps scenes. Its so phony. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
