Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 51-75 of 200 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Rocco Siffredi

51. Rocco Siffredi (0)

lk2fireone (196) 09-14-10  10:13am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Large amount of content.
-Wide variety of content of sexual activity.
-Current Site Stats (2010-09-14):
Movies : 998
DVDs : 212
Actors : 1019
Hours : 440
Total Size : 398 Gb
-Site is currently updating. Updates 1 video clip every 1-4 days (very irregular update schedule).
-No DRM.
-No site timeout.
-No watermark on older style videos.
Cons: -Navigation is basic and awkward.
-To log on to the network, you have to enter through the site you joined
through. You can't log on directly to any of the sister sites you have access to. Once you log on to the site you joined, only then can you enter
one of the sister sites you have access to.
-Moving around a single site is basic and awkward. To search for files at the site, or to look through the files available, have to look at lists from drop-down menus, or have to click many times to change from different pages. There is a lot of material at this site, and it's cumbersome to try to glance through the different video and photoset files.
-Need a fast ISP connection to play the streaming videos, otherwise the streams will frequently stutter and stop.
-A few good-sized thumbnails to show what the models look like in each video would be very helpful.
-A simple listing of the models appearing in each video would be helpful. Many models in videos are not named.
Bottom Line: Viewing options:
Download options: high and low resolution.
Streaming options: high and low quality.
Other options: trailer or screen capture.

Frame width by height: 720x480
Total bitrate: 2128 kbps

Quality of the video depends on whether the video is the high quality or the low quality option. Also depends on how long ago the video was shot.
The more recent videos are higher quality.
High quality streaming is not high quality. It is higher quality than the low quality, but it is nowhere near what some sites have as high quality.
These are professionally shot videos, but the overall quality could be much better in many ways.
One example: I am watching a scene where Rocco and a second man are both on a woman. In parts of the scene, you are seeing the action through a large block of clear plastic or glass. You want to see what's happening, without having a block of plastic obscuring the action. Remove the plastic, or shoot from a different angle. This is not the camera-man trying to be artistic, it's just the camera-man being lazy or stupid and
not bothering to shoot from an angle that clearly shows the action.
Site content:
You have a lot of vintage porn (101 videos) and even more straight recent
porn (892 videos). The vintage porn tries to add a little story-line to the sex, maybe even have some costumes. It's basically sex, with a little
story that is a negligible attempt to add some flavor or meaning to the sex.

The more recent porn also has a tiny story-line, but it's really just straight sex. The actors follow a script that is mainly fucking and
sucking, with little conversation (the female models probably don't understand much English, and English is what appears to be used to
communicate in the videos). Minor roughness and humiliation to the sex, but not a lot of hard-core roughness or hard-core humiliation. Most scenes are group-type sex, where you have 3 or more people fucking. Cunnilingus, bj, vaginal and anal sex in almost all scenes. No homo-erotic action of boy+boy. You do get boy+girl, 2 boys+girl, 2 girls+boy, or more than 3 people). Some girl+girl action in some of the scenes, but the main emphasis is on the boy+girl action.
I was a member of this site a year ago. At that time I found some videos that I thought were really good. But I can't find those videos now. If the videos are still at the site, I can't find them because of the poor navigation.
There is a large amount of video content, and the videos are split into series where the type of sexual action is changed from one series to
another. The models are mainly Eastern European females.
Rocco Siffredi is the star of the site, he's featured in most videos, and he can become annoying at times with his heavily accented English and overly boyish charm.
The quality of the videos is OK to good, not great. The large amount of content, and the wide variety of content means there is plenty of material to search through.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit ALS Scan

52. ALS Scan (1)

artnoir (17) 08-20-10  07:40pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - A fantastic array of beautiful girls
- Very detailed and "up-front" photos
- High quality vids, offered in three different formats; 1280x720 HD DivX, 1280x720 HD MP4, 1920x1080 HD WM
- Older models have their videos remastered and published
- Director's blog - you can read and find out what's going behind the scenes and grab some exclusive vid's or photo shoots
- Lots of mqsturbation and self-toying action
- Their castings are featured on video, and photos /w commentary
Cons: - The website design. I've been a member three times, and it hasn't changed much from when I first joined in 2002.
- No search function
- Too much fisting for my taste
- Too much focus on "perfect breasts and no tattoos", come on, let in a girl that have some personality and quirky feautres.
- ALS hasn't published all videos of their older models (instead they sell them on DVD for 49.99 o so), come on.
Give us long time fans everything that was ever made with girls like Joanne, Jana, April, etc to download, and I'll be an happy customer.
- Download speeds. It averages at 150 kbit/s per file, and I ave a 8mbit/s line, and there seems to be a 2 or 3 file downloadlimit.
- Only works in IE
Bottom Line: I think that ALS has run it course, yes it is still joinable, and it's not a bad site to join (especially if it is for the first time), but as a third time member I must say that I'm not impressed.

It feels like time stood still, and yes, they do HD, but it is so boring to watch.

And most of the new models are rubbish. They should have picked up at least 10 new models that they discarded from the casting sessions (because she looked unhappy or had a tattoo), come on man.

It's not good enough!
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Dominated Girls

53. Dominated Girls (0)

RustyJ (145) 08-14-10  08:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Lots of sex in bondage. I'm not really after spanking and pissing so I don't miss that.
-Gorgeous big name Euro stars dominated here. Aletta Ocean, Madison Parker among others.
-High quality video looks really good. 1080p is a reasonable download choice if you have big display and a good connection.
-Gags and nipple tweezers everywhere.
-Male talent doesn't irritate me yet. It's rare to see Euro stuff without that handful of smug looking guys in every scene (there are ladies watching too).
Cons: -Heavy on ropes. Rope bondage is my least favorite type. Needs more stock, bars and other rigid, heavy stuff.
-Little repetitive content with same props and scenes used over and over. Little too dark at times.
-21Sextury cons apply here too:
--Bad download issues without download manager
--Small pictures
Bottom Line: This is one of the three fetish sites on 21Sextury. Why there needs to be three is beyond me and I only got this one when joining. The others are Enslaved Gals and Mighty Mistress and they appear to be more female on female stuff.

Alone this stuff wouldn't be worth 85 score. I have to wait and see but I guess the total score of fetish stuff on 21Sextury might be 90 or more. However these three sites together are less than 10% of the whole package you get, eventually for 9.95$ a month. A steal if you asking me.

They have 124 scenes at the moment, roughly 50 in 1080p, another 50 in 720p and rest in low rest. Pictures could be much bigger but they are good quality.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit House Of Taboo

54. House Of Taboo (0)

RustyJ (145) 08-14-10  12:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Great variety of the popular BDSM fetish niches. There's bondage, spanking, latex, leather and even some more rare stuff like pissing and medical play. If you are into this stuff, you'll like this site.
-Nicely arranged site with clear subcategories (spanking, bondage, latex, pissing and a medical fetish section).
-Some seriously hot stuff if you are into these niches. It's as hardcore as it gets and the models are mostly great looking European big name stars.
-None of the frustrating catch and release bondage or removing the fetish wear as the first thing. The theme stays strong over the whole scenes. Also as the talent is non English speaking, there is none of that "Yes Master! Yes Master!" nonsense that I don't really like to hear.
-All DDF Prod pros apply. Same great quality all over the site. Photography is outstanding always and video quality is consistent in all but the older clips.
Cons: -Updates are quite a random grab so you might get something great or wait a whole month to never see anything you like. I for example would like to see more sex in bondage and good looking fetish wear and less solo pissing or g/g spanking.
-Split scenes that are added as separate updates. That means you see undressing and spanking from one scene as update on one week and the hardcore action as an update next week.
-Apparently some old material has gone missing. There are dead links and I can use Google's image search to find scenes that are not on the site anymore.
-Nitpicking for sure but once you are through what they have, you wish they had a lot more ;)
Bottom Line: Take my score of 93 for this site as a sub score within my review of DDF Prod in general (I gave it 90). I don't see anyone subscribing to these single sites anymore as a whole network can be had for little more.

All in all this is a serious strong point within DDF in my book. Along with HandsOnHardcore this one basically makes the whole network for me. The material is pretty unique and I don't think even kink.com comes close in HoT's special niche. This material kind of reminds me of old stuff you could find in Hustler's Taboo magazines way back in early 2000's.

I'm not quite sure where this site is going in the long run. The older material seems of higher quality to me in terms of uniqueness and ideas. I also get slightly irritated with that smug looking Euro male talent they have been using lately. You can only view so many clips with these choky ice's or george uhl's in it if you get my point ;)
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Brutal Dildos

55. Brutal Dildos (0)

killahla (4) 07-26-10  01:49pm
Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: *Extreme content
*High-quality videos
*Decent models
Cons: *Slow downloads
*Old content is of a lower quality
*Potential website glitch
Bottom Line: Extremely big dildos... check. Hot girls willing to take said dildos in both holes... check. Extreme action with said dildos and said girls... check.

Based on the size of the "brutal" dildos used, there's little doubt that this website falls under the extreme sex category.

The problem with most extreme sex websites is that they usually aren't as extreme as they advertise themselves to be, and the featured girls usually aren't in the upper echelon of the aesthetically pleasing department.

Not so with Brutal Dildos. The action is very extreme, not only due to the sheer size of the dildos used, but also the velocity at which their used.

A lot of the girls featured on Brutal Dildos are actually mainstream porn actresses. That's really a breath of fresh air, if you ask me. If you've been around the porn block long enough, you've probably noticed that the actresses that perform in the extreme porn genre are either age-challenged, weight-challenged, looks-challenged or all of the above. Not so with the girls featured on Brutal Dildos - most of them are actually very hot.

Besides the dildos, the quality of the videos, the download speed and the website experience (for lack of a better term) are also brutal. That's to say, they take away from the overall enjoyment of the website.

The quality of videos is average compared to the quality of videos on other adult sites. That in itself is not a deal breaker in my opinion. What is a deal breaker, however, is the download speed.

Videos take a very long time to download. Even though I have a fast Internet connection, the videos don't download at speeds anywhere near to what my connection speed is capable of.

I'm not a website expert, so I don't know how to technically describe what I'm about to say, but... something just ain't right with the website. As I mentioned above, the download speed is very slow. In addition to that, the website is slow to navigate, and after being a member for months, all of a sudden one day, I was unable to successfully log in, even after multiple attempts (which consequently caused me to cancel my membership).

Overall, Brutal Dildos is a good website for those of you fancy the extreme stuff.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Huge Strapon Lesbians

56. Huge Strapon Lesbians (0)

pat362 (375) 06-25-10  08:22pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -They currently have 76 scenes(all dated).
-They update with one new scene per week.
-Access to 6 other sites.
-Movies can be downloaded in parts or whole.
-Videos com in 640 & 1920 WMV as well as 640 MP4.
-You can use a download manager.
-The performers are all identified with their proper name.
-The toys used do match the name of the site.
-Photosets can be downloaded in zip format.
Cons: -The only way to search for a scene is by it's date, the type sex (vag/anal) and it's score.
-Although you get 6 other sites. Only 3 of those may still be updating with new content.
-The photosets have a resolution of 1200 x 800 but they appear more like teaser material than an actual desire to satisfy their customer.
-The price is pretty steap for what you get.
-Older content on the other sites is of poor quality and looks very dated.
Bottom Line: This site belongs to the same people that own norestfortheass or they use the same director locations and performers. I was a recent member of N.R.F.T.A so the similarities in content, performers and styly is obvious. I can't prove it but I think they saw an opportunity to make more money by stopping to update content on one or more of their network and creating this new site with that content. I would have prefered paying a couple of dollars more and getting this content with my norestfortheass membership.

I think that only brutal dildos and maybe Sasha Rose are still updating but the prior is again content that could and should have been added to the N.R.F.T.A network and not this one.

If you like Girl/Girl action with huge toys that penetrate vaginas and anus than you will be satified.

To be avoided with anyone looking for serious passion between the performers. Some were able to portray it but most missed theboat.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Girls Abuse Guys

57. Girls Abuse Guys (0)

StrapMe (3) 05-20-10  08:30am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Excellent movie resolution
+Full length videos
+Beautiful actresses
+All videos run until male climaxes
+Good variety in video themes
+Upcoming videos are hackable...you can get them before they are released on the site if you manipulate the urls
+Fast downloads
Cons: -$29.95 just seems like too much to pay per month for a porn site.
-Limited number of still shots
Bottom Line: Out of all the F2M strapon sites I have seen (and I have seen almost all of them as of this date) this one seems to have the best quality scene direction and some of the most beautiful women.

There is a tremendous variety in the types of scenes although most seem to be two women on one man...something that I like. About half of the videos involve women who are wearing clothing with a strapon over their clothing. I prefer to see women who are at least topless. There is also good variety in the types of women involved - large breasted to small - blondes, brunettes and readheads.

There is no interracial action which may disappoint some, but I consider a plus. I've just never been attracted to black women. Give me a blonde with large natural breasts and a huge strapon any day! Speaking of natural breasts, many of the women are natural, but there are also some who have rather large fake breasts. Nevertheless, they are all beautiful.

Unlike sites like "Strapon Tryouts" (another favorite of mine), Girls Abuse Guys seems to use smaller strap-ons. I'd prefer to see larger like the John Holmes - something at least 10 inches and 3 inches in circumference.

As far as F2M strapon sex is concerned, the sex is pretty normal - no double penetration and no fisting that I recall.

I would like to see scenes where the guy gets to penetrate one or both of the women especially while the other woman penetrates him. Maybe even a double penetration of one of the women by a strapon and the male would be good, but then I guess that would not be girls abusing guys, would it?

The bottom line is this site is worth a month's fee to download all of their current videos. They are some of the best for F2M strapon lovers.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit German Goo Girls

58. German Goo Girls (0)

John7777 (5) 05-14-10  03:34pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Exclusive content
Good quality videos
Good quality pictures
Full membership gets you access to a bunch of bonus sites.
DRM free videos
Updates regularly.
Cons: Costs $34.95 to join.
Downloads are HUGE. 30 minutes or longer wait is normal.
Almost all the bonus sites are video streaming only with no downloading options.
The few sites that include video downloading may still have DRM protection on them.
A lot of the bonus sites never seem to update or update very rarely.
Doesn't make it clear what is and isn't a bonus site.
Going to a non-bonus site may end up getting you charged for a full membership to another site without even knowing it.
eurorevenue.com is a complete nightmare to cancel your subscription from.
Bottom Line: It's sad because germangoogirls.com can very easily stand to be one of the better bukkake sites out there. The videos are truly great but do to the $34.95 price tag and their horrible business practices this site is very hard to recommend to anyone.

It's true you get access to plenty of bonus sites but almost all are video streaming only or have DRM protection still on them. Most of the bonus sites never seem to update or they have the exact same videos/content as the others sites.

The one thing that truly kills this site is the way they seem to do business. They don't make it clear what is and isn't a bonus site. If you make the mistake of clicking on a non-bonus site or simply trying to close out a pop up ad like I did, you may end up getting charged a full membership to the site and not even know it.

At least when they where doing business with epoch.com you get a friendly warning of "Thank you for you business" window pop up and at least when they where with epoch.com it was possible to get a refund for this mistake.

The credit card processing company they are with now eurorevenue.com is a complete nightmare to use. It's almost impossible to cancel your subscription without actually calling the company or locking your credit/debit card and getting a new one (Like I had too).

With the large price tag and a lot of hidden dangers on the site it's in your best judgement not to join this site. If you do your going to regret it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Brutal Dildos

59. Brutal Dildos (0)

sylvern (15) 05-11-10  08:54am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Massive dildos, enthusiastic girls, and extreme penetrations in all holes. Great action in general, anal scenes in particular are delightful.
* High quality videos (DRM free) which can be streamed or downloaded (in full or in parts) in a few formats (WMV, MP4, flash). Most recent videos are 1920 res (HD) which is excellent to see, earlier vids are at 640.
* High resolution photos for each scene (almost always 1200x800px landscape or 800x1200 portrait)
* About 300 solo scenes on offer stemming back to 2005
* Access to a good number bonus sites including Huge Strapon Lesbians, Sasha Rose, and several others focusing on Anal, Dildos, Lesbians etc. You also get access to bonus DVDs and pics which are mainly in the 'extreme penetrations' category.
* Billing with Epoch and CCBill.
* Regular weekly updates
Cons: * Variable attractiveness of models, although this has generally improved with recent updates.
* Billing with Epoch needs fixing; if you live in EU they charge you 29.99 which obviously isn't the same as the $29.99 they advertise. If you encounter the same problem, join with the alternative biller (CCBill) instead.
* Main page is slightly misleading as it advertises lesbian scenes as part of Brutal Dildos which are in fact featured on its sister site. Not a big issue though as you get access to it as part of your membership.
* Members area is a bit tacky in design and the search function could be improved as you currently can't insert names or keywords you might be looking for.
* Older videos from '06/'05 are of poorer quality, but again not a big issue because that's only to be expected.
Bottom Line: Huge dildos and extreme penetrations - the basic premise of the website is fantastic. There's something very appealing about girls stretching their holes and having a lot of fun in doing so. It's why I joined the website previously back in '07, only to eventually leave because the quantity and quality could have done with more improvement.

Coming back now and having had some time to mull over the changes I'm really pleased that they've continued to update consistently, have introduced new toys into the mix, and have included many more anal scenes. The majority of the action is still pussy oriented, and I think the balance on the whole is good. The newest movies are of very high quality and a treat to watch; pics are of good resolution and there are always several video formats for each scene. You get a lot of bonus stuff too to keep things relatively interesting, and you'll probably find yourself spending a fair bit of time on Huge Strapon Lesbians as it features excellent raunchy action.

There are some small negatives about the website as mentioned above. They could make browsing a bit more pleasant and the quality of models could still improve further. If they want to really compete with the leading sites online they'd probably have to bring the picture quality up a notch. I would personally like to see more frequent updates as well, but having remained consistent over the years is to their credit. All in all these are fairly minor critiques - if you like girls mounting big dildos, then this fits the bill and it's definitely worth subscribing to.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit ALS Scan

60. ALS Scan (1)

rearadmiral (388) 05-04-10  04:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Stunning models
- All models are young, petite and shaved
- Some great scenes on location in Europe and the Caribbean
- Pictures and video available
- No DRM
- HUGE volume of material available
- Some public nudity
- The public scenes are very well done
- Simple, if somewhat dated, navigation
Cons: - No search function apart from searching by model
- Less public nudity than I expected since it was heavily promoted in the tour
Bottom Line: The reason I joined ALS Scan was because the previews showed that there was some public nudity available, and as a big fan of that I joined for that reason alone.

While Im not a big fan of solo softcore sites, I have to admit to being really impressed with ALS Scan. This is an excellent site that offers some stunning women in both videos and pictures. All of the women are pretty much of the same body type petite and small breasted. For a guy who thinks small-breasted petite women are the best, this makes the site even better. There is a decent mix of Eastern European models and American women. Some porn stars make an appearance too, like Courtney Simpson and Faye Reagan. Most of the models are also fairly young (18-25) and, as the sites name says, all of the ladies are shaved. So if you like petite, young, shaved models, you should consider a membership on the strength of that alone.

Many of the video/picture shoots take place on an indoor set, but there are a lot that are shot in the Caribbean. These are visually outstanding. Apart from solo girl action, there is some peeing, some toy and speculum use and some girl/girl stuff. All of it is well shot.

The videos are classed into two broad categories: masturbation and photo shoot. The photo shoot scenes are pretty interesting as they give a behind-the-scenes perspective on what goes on.

I joined because the site promised some public nudity. There is some of that, but not a lot. What is there is excellent though, and for a big fan of public stuff that alone was worth the price. All the public nudity is done in Europe with European models. For a site into solo girls, they really seem to understand public nudity. Unlike some other sites (Nude in LA) the public nudity isnt matter-of-fact and sterile. It is really well done and the titillation and risk are well presented. They also do something that Ive never seen before and hope to see more of that is using body paint to paint a skimpy outfit on a nude model and then send her out to the streets. This is really innovative and a lot of fun to watch. I appreciate that the editors chose to film the painting too this adds to the fun.

But ALS Scan also has the technical side right too. They offer several different choices of resolution with the HD being visually stunning. Other reviewers have covered more of the technical stuff below.

One drawback is that there is no search function. I had no way to easily find the public nudity even though each scene was categorized in that way. Likewise, there is no way to separate out the photo shoot scenes from that masturbation scenes. Some search function would be an improvement.

I may not be a big fan of solo girl sites, but Im now a big fan of ALS Scan. The people behind ALS present some stunning models in well-shot scenes and make it available through an easy-to-use and modern website. Overall, an excellent value.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit ALS Scan

61. ALS Scan (1)

turboshaft (24) 04-05-10  12:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 250+ smiling, skinny, shaved, super-hot hot models
+ Still almost purely solo- or girl-girl action that stays pretty entertaining
+ Amazing quality:
videos: HD up to 1920x1080 @ 300 kb/s
photos: hi-res are roughly 3900x2600px
+ Great quantity too; archived vids back to Apr 2007, photos much farther back
+ Daily video updates, new photo set released every two days
+ Download speeds have a lot of ass; I normally got about 1.3MB/s with a DL manager
+ They donate some of their pervy profits to charity, in case philanthropy is a deciding factor
Cons: - Large percentage of videos are just BTS, and with photo sets the BTS is usually just mixed in
- Some models' content takes a long time to get released or simply stays unreleased
- Site design works well for what it is, but still has NO search function
- They are beginning to delve into boy-girl content, even if only lightly (read more in BL)
- Despite the fun some content can get predictable and routine
- 2 years since my first review and I still wish they would shoot more American girls or non-Euro girls
- I don't get to meet these girls in person! :-(
Bottom Line: What can I say that hasn't already been said so many times and so well about one of my all time favorite adult sites over the years--hell, over the history of much of the crazy web itself, seeing how these guys have been finding and shooting hot shaved ladies since 1996. And since they have been doing this for so long they know a thing or two about getting the goods; great photo and video quality, lots of content, fast access, and above all some very happy models, many of whom come back wanting more.

That last point, happy models who become 'repeat offenders' shall we say, is not something I take lightly when I am looking for a new site to join and it's something where ALS has never faltered. I may be in the minority when I say this, but I genuinely don't enjoy porn where the performers, know matter how willing, are abused, beaten up, disrespected, or at the end of the day just left dissatisfied and unhappy. Of course ALS being in the girls only genre probably helps keep things in check but it, like the majority of sites, is still owned and run by a male and caters to a primarily male audience.

And despite all of this male input the output for many years was totally female; female models with female assistants in most cases and a female co-performer or two in some others. But in the past few years they have, if ever so slightly, started to also use male assistants, or at least made them more visible in both photos and videos--not my cup of tea, thank you very much. Even more alarming--or simply the next logical step, depending on your view--they have just recently shot an actual boy-girl scene. It's yet to be released and is described as a blowjob scene with swallowing, but time will tell as to where ALS steers its content.

Generally speaking, and if you're not looking for hardcore content, there's a lot to love here and at least a little to hate. So take your pick; young, skinny, shaved, mostly white models who are not too shy, so don't be surprised by a single model performing many if not all of the following; peeing, fisting, speculum and other crazy insertions, anal, and near constant spreading. The site design may not be impressive to many, nor may be the large amount of BTS, but don't let it fool you--as girls-only content goes they do not disappoint.

I do wish they would be more consistent in releases though. They still have a habit of letting members vote on models' scenes to determine release order and this can mean months before a model's whole shoot is available, and some just never gets released at all. I guess this is a good thing--so much content that there's not enough time to release it all--but I would like to see it eventually. And as unique as some of their content is it can get predictably routine; toy A into slot b, and so on.

But damn if they don't make it look hot time and time again with each new model they find and corrupt. All these years and I'm still sold! :-P
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Visit In Focus Girls

62. In Focus Girls (0)

Helvetic (8) 02-16-10  07:12am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Young nice-looking European models
+ Actions varying from masturbation to peeing, fisting, etc
+ Pictures up to 2000px
+ Downloads in zips
+ High Def Videos (1280*720, 4Mbit WMV; .MOV is also available)
+ no DRM
Cons: - more types of models would be nice
- price conversion $1 = 1 for Europe (but still not so bad:
- some lack of passion in models
Bottom Line: A nice site for those looking for masturbating and doing other funny things, from peeing to fisting, young European girls. Even though it looks like the diversity of actions is decreasing with time (at least fisting has hardly been observed in the latest updates), this may distract only some long-term users; for site beginners it is fully compensated by the total amount of content.

It would probably be better to have more types of models, but, at least, all existing ones are really very nice-looking (and, well, is it possible at all to satisfy both conditions?). And, in addition, it's a really great number of different faces there, so one will spend rather a long time before memorizing all of them.

A special word should be written about resolution of pics and up to 2000px for pictures and 4Mbit WMV for video it practically covers what most home systems can process; presence of .MOV format for video can be good for Mac users. And, note, all that comes even for Europe for only 20/month (some special offer); for those paying in $$ it's even better,
as the figure is the same ($20)
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Sic Flics

63. Sic Flics (0)

Murkk (2) 02-14-10  02:51pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site is a very niche site. I thought I'd check it out and see what's up. There are about 1400 or so videos. They show lots of fisting / pissing videos, and some are very extreme.
Cons: Most of the 1500 videos are small in size and quality (80 mb or less). Many of them have been ripped off from other sites and internet content. Most are short 2-5 min clips. The videos haven't been tagged for easy searching. There is only about 5 videos / week update, and most of them are very short in length.
Bottom Line: I wouldn't recommend this site. Seems I'm 0 for 2 this month in selecting sites. They really need to either get some exclusive content or find some higher quality full lenght videos to put on their site.

Overall, there are better sites out there that give better content.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit ALS Scan

64. ALS Scan (1)

adrenalinrush (5) 02-09-10  01:56am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: +++ daily updates
+++ great models + primilary teens
+++ big archive for movies and galleries
++ newer videos in hdv quality (16:9) older ones are in 4:3 format
++ no DRM or download limitations
+ easy navigation
+ good price
Cons: --- inconsistant design
--- outmoded technologies in use e.g.popups (without scrollbars when needed)
-- some girls wear braces
-- the repetitivness of content is obvious but part of the concept
Bottom Line: ALS Scan is a good blast from the past till the present. They were part of the porn history online and had formed their own unique style.

ALS Scan has shaved girls only. You'll find them often in solo, girl girl, oiled up, toy, pee, speculum and veggie action or in combination of those.

They offer exactly what they promise and that makes ALS Scan a perfect match for those who seek for flexible teens, small tits, spread legs and other kinky stuff.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit In Focus Girls

65. In Focus Girls (0)

anyonebutme (14) 02-05-10  06:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -well encoded 720p videos
-new exclusive content added daily
-large archive of hot European girls masturbating
Cons: -photoshopping of images increasing as time goes on
-a medium level of passion in most videos
Bottom Line: The other reviews cover all the major details, no need to recite them again. Great site for solo masturbation videos, and some peeing scenes still finding their way into the new updates. Three fisting scenes released in all of 2009 - most videos are straight masturbation - fingering / toying. A lot of outdoor settings. Good, though the frequency of updates that really makes ones eyes pop wide open, are not too frequent. But then again, this site is still better than the direct competition! Hope the photographers will improve on this just a little more.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Latina Abuse

66. Latina Abuse (0)

MortTort (3) 01-23-10  11:58am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-23-10  10:31pm  (Update History)
Reason: Factual errors
Pros: - High quality video, offers downloads of 720p and 1080p for all videos done within a little over a year, about 30+ per site.
-Picture sets are nice and appear to be taken directly during filming, not like some other sites where the pictures don't match up to the actual scene.
Cons: - Download speeds restricted
- Navigation could be a lot better, no model search or anything of the like.
Bottom Line: I love the high quality videos and the scenes are different. But, it is very repetitive and they are a little too over the top. I have a hard time feeling any arousal toward a woman who has here own spit all over her face let alone the dbags filming and acting in the video are spitting on them as well. The spitting just gets extremely annoying and all you can think about is punching the cameraman/narrator in the face. The only real good thing about the site is that they have caught up with the times in video quality.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Meat Members

67. Meat Members (0)

dilbert4100 (10) 01-19-10  10:05pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Lots of content
-Content is unique and original
-Multiple download options
Cons: -Often has very slow download speeds depending on the time of day
-Most videos are only available for download in clip formats.
-No ZIP downloads for pics.
-Many of the sites are dead.
Bottom Line: Okay, the little stuff first. The website is pretty easy to navigate, which is always a plus. When searching for a particular star, I recommend typing in the name rather than trying to search through the alphabetical listing. Those listings are either by letter (which will show you every scene by every performer starting with that name and not in alphabetical order) or you can do a search in alphabetical order (but there is no separation between letters and requires you to search through page after page until you find the performer you are looking for). That part is a mess, I know. You also have the option to search by genre or select whichever site you want, which goes without saying I suppose.

Now for the not so small stuff. I have to say I'm really disappointed in this site. It looked so promising with lots of really good porn, and for the most part, the porn is pretty good. It's unique and interesting. The visual quality is okay, but unless it's absolutely terrible, I'm not usually worried about something like that. Sure, HD quality would be nice, but in all honesty, it just takes up more space on the hard drive.

There are a lot of dead sites, which is understandable considering how long this network seems to have been around. However, only 7 or 8 out of the 52 available sites seem to be updating on any sort of regular basis.

Most of the videos are available for download as clips only, which, I could understand for the really old stuff, but it seems like if the material is more than a year old it gets put in the clip only bin. Then there are the pics which are not available for download as ZIP files. Honestly, everyone does that now, but not these guys.

Finally, we come to the download speeds, which can be really slow. I mean we're talking about less than 50 Kbps slow. When you put this together with large clip only downloads and no ZIP files, it makes me wonder if the owners of the network are having some serious issues with their bandwith.

In the end, I'm not sure I can recommend this network of sites. The content is good, but honestly, I don't think the download speed issues and the lack of ZIP files for the pics and numerous clip only downloads can over come the content. As they say, the devil is in the details.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Meat Members

68. Meat Members (0)

Robbi81 (4) 12-19-09  06:47am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Many unique niches for everyones taste
- Updated several times a week
- A good mix of amateurs and professional models
Cons: - About 75% of the sites are dead
- Some of the sites are not "exclusive" footage
- Slow upload of pages and downloads
- Customer service could be better. Some difficulties when cancelling
- Navigation could be updated
Bottom Line: A unique network that has sites for many fetishes. Was a very good network 2 years ago, but needs to be updated now to become competition with other networks.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Drilled Mouths

69. Drilled Mouths (0)

james4096 (126) 12-13-09  02:37am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - You get access to 25 other sites
- zip downloads for photosets
- no DRM or daily download limit from what I could tell
- No silicone
Cons: - Not much content. Only 45 scenes
- Only 2 updates in 2009
- Only download option is wmv
- The content might be exclusive, but it might also be available to other sites as a feed based on the url
- Older videos are lower quality.
- The videos have generic file names. 3 digits, for example 698.wmv.
Bottom Line: The scenes here are almost always one girl and one guy. It usually starts out pretty tender, but in no time he's trying to jam his dong all the way down her throat. After the bj they fuck a little bit and then a pretty good cumshot. I would say this is moderate deep throating action. Don't get me wrong, sometimes it's intense, but definitely not as hardcore as facial abuse. The girls are all able to take a cock down their throat and there's a fair amount of gagging, but it's not very rough or violent. And I don't recall any vomiting. I don't know if that's good or bad, that's just how it is. I felt the scenes were repetitive at times. For example the girls always end up sucking the guy off at some point while grabbing on to her own ankles. Anyway, all of the models are Eastern European. None of them are those super beautiful busty Czech girls you see on the net today, but nonetheless they were all at least cute. All natural though, no implants. I liked them.

The latest videos in high quality are 832x468 with bitrates ranging from 2000kbps to 3145kbps. Every video has full scene download and split clips. There are two qualities of wmv to download and two in streaming flash. Older videos are smaller and have much lower bitrates like 716kbps. Some vids don't have watermarks, and some do.

Photos are 800x1200 for the latest stuff and for the older stuff 680x1023. Most people don't join this type of site looking for photos, but every scene has them, and zip downloads too.

Though I liked the scenes enough, there just isn't that much content at this site and it doesn't seem like it will be growing any time soon. You do get access to around 25 other sites though. I'm not sorry I joined at all, but I must give this one a low recommendation.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit In Focus Girls

70. In Focus Girls (0)

propaGhandi (5) 12-09-09  12:56pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + some very sexy young girls
+ daily updates
+ no DRM
+ HD videos
+ HiRes Images
+ plenty of viewing options
+ zip-files
Cons: - site design
- navigation needs improvement
- needs more diversity in the models
- can turn into a daily routine
- more babe details please
- slow downloads
Bottom Line: Yes, the site provides great quality - pictures and videos - and an phenomenal archive. But I would love to have more diversity in the girls. Many of the babes here have the same look.

The lack of model details and slow downloads frustrated me a bit.

A site re-design and the usage of common technologies would increase the browsing experience drastically.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Dirty Director

71. Dirty Director (0)

pornpundit (3) 12-08-09  08:56am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: perhaps the most raunchy site on the net
these gals are true honest to badness trailer trash. the site proves that the dirty director will fuck anything on two legs no matter how ugly. still nasty nasty nasty
Cons: the quality of the flicks are atrocious. perhaps the last site ion the net to download in 360 resolution. has used the same camera his mother gave him when he was 18. too cheap to hire a camera person the pov gets both boring and tedious. i plead with the webmaster to start video production with decent equipment as there is a great facination of watching these true southern sluts do their anal thing. to add insult to injury the cheapscate refuses to provide one click downloads but instead cuts the vids inio small maddining snipits
Bottom Line: nasty true southern trailer trash gals who ,more then likely are doing video for the first and last time but oh so real!! now if we can get the director to hire an assistant and stop using methods that were lacking even in the 1990's,allow us one click downloads,the score would soar into the eighties
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Teach Me Fisting

72. Teach Me Fisting (0)

mr smut (42) 11-27-09  11:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + exclusive content and network access (limited for the first 2 months)
+ weekly updates on Friday
+ Site seems to have no download limit
+ lots of fisting and even some double vaginal or anal fisting
+ over 250 unique scenes and 193 different models
+ the newest videos are also available in full HD as WMV or H.264
+ good mix of well known models and some newcomers or one timers(?) as well
Cons: - you have to enter a captcha code every time you login
- pictures are only 1280 pixel on the long side
- some older videos are only 448x336 pixel large
- photo series sometimes have only very few pictures
- models are often heavily rouged I like a more natural look
- no model bios not even measurements are given
Bottom Line: This is a site dedicated to fisting content only and it's a quite nice one. I was happy to see that this one is diectly available for me too after I joined Lusty Grandmas. It's fun to explore the huge archive using the beta version of the new user interface even though it still needs some work.

Lots of the scenes contain crazy stuff like insertion of huge dildos or baseball bats and female assitents fisting the models. As already stated in my review on Lusty Grandmas this is real hard stuff and maybe not everybodys taste. I only wonder why so many of the younger models seem to speak no english at all.
Also I was distracted by some of the comments the guys filming the models made.

Within the last few days I experienced some problems when downloading content from this site. Sometimes the downloads won't start or what's even worse stop after already having downloaded some hundred megabytes. Guess I'll try to make my download manager work with this site.

For someone being interested in stuff like this I'd recommend to have a look at it. The download problems costs some points but the content is 100% o.k. as far as I'm concerned.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit American Bukkake

73. American Bukkake (0)

mbaya (366) 10-25-09  10:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-Weekly updates
-Easy navigation, but no search engine
-Photo sets for every video however the photos are at best 750x500.
-Extreme number, 75 to over 100 participants in each video
Cons: -Too expensive for the quality and quantity of content. Comes with only one other site, gagfactor.com.
-Sparse download options. WMV 720x480, 1463 kbps at best, or stream as weaker WMV. Can download clips that are 320x240.
-Site advertises the price as $29.95, but I was charged $33.79. I am taking this up with CCBill as customer service never responded.
Bottom Line: Everything here has been released on DVD before. The models are nearly all pornstars, with a handful of amateurs. Most are fake blonds, but I found a minimum of fake tits or tattoos.

The site can be broken down into five kinds of bukkake videos.

Quite a few, maybe 20%, are behind the scenes. Some of this is interesting, but by no means all of it. In my opinion, they should not have bothered with this. This is one way to get weekly updates though.

Another group is reverse bukkake. In these scenes the lone guy is surrounded by a very large group of female models. There is no real sex going on here, but the women squirt in his mouth after masturbating. I don't care much for this.

The next group has the same concept, but all of the participants are women. I suspect that in both of these last two categories it is really piss, not squirting. This is too fake for my taste.

Another category is the pure bukkake videos. The model shows off her body and then gets cum on her face from sometimes as many as 100 guys. No sex, just facials. Mostly pretty entertaining if this is something that appeals to you. While I found them to be fun, I was also glad the length was only about 20 minutes each. They can get repetitious as it is basically the same scenario over and over.

The last category was what they call American Gokkun. These are similar to the bukkake videos, but the girls swallow all the guys cum. The closest site I could compare this to is Germangoogirls. On both sites the girls seem to welcome the large amounts of cum. On this one the guys just come in her mouth, but there is no sex or other physical contact. On GGG, there is plenty of sex and also large numbers of guys that cum in the woman's mouth. Here the videography is straightforward, just the action. On GGG, the lighting and artistic aspects are very distracting. I very much prefer the videos on this site.

I basically just paid attention to the bukkake and gokkun videos. I found them to be fun, but very similar. There just isn't much variety. A downside to the site that I didn't like is that the 78 videos posted after February 2008 are at best 720x480. That is ok, but hardly hi def. The videos from 2004 to 2008 were all useless as they were at best 320x240. The number of higher quality videos in the bukkake and gokkun categories is only 22. That makes the site very expensive.

Recommended, but the site is just too small for the price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Latina Abuse

74. Latina Abuse (0)

mbaya (366) 10-20-09  10:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted price through TBP.
-No DRM or download resrictions. With files about 1 GB each this is the only way to go.
-Hi Def videos in 1080P are available. Some of the best on the internet. So real you feel you are really there.
-81 Videos, about a half hour to 45 minutes. Short concise interviews of maybe 3 minutes each.
-Excellent videography. No diagonals, never a focus on the wrong part of the room. They seem to never miss the right shot to display the action.
-Supports download managers. Lightning fast downloads. I max out at 2.5MB
-Photosets for nearly every video.
-Almost all real first time amateurs. I recognized only two pornstars. As you might imagine the amateur's attractiveness varies, but they lend a touch of reality as they are not acting. No fake reactions, moaning, overacting, etc. Only a few, I counted only two, have tattoos.
-Part of a huge network of 22 good size websites.
Cons: -The site shows little, if any, respect for the women. Too much spitting, face slapping, and verbal abuse.
-No search engine, yet the models are on multiple sites in the network.
-Constant stream of emails from the network as a former member. When they offer a discounted price, you get maybe 12 to 15 emails telling you. I signed up as a member during a promotion and still got multiple last chance offers.
Bottom Line: This is a sister site to facialabuse.com and ghettogaggers.com. The focus here is on Latinas.

You don't get slick cookie cutter videos as you see on sites such as 8thstreetlatinas.com. What you do get is very forceful rough sex with a focus on face fucking. If you like facialabuse.com or ghettogaggers.com, you get the same type of videos. Check reviews of those sites for more details.

The models are nearly all amateurs. Most are quite attractive, natural looking and are a step above the quality to be found on facialabuse and ghettogaggers. As you might guess with amateurs, the quality varies.

Recent videos have much higher quality, with downloads at their best at 1080p. Unfortunately this is only 38 of the 81 videos. The rest are much lower quality with many at 340x240.

However, the site has been very actively posting in 2009 with 24 new videos. This is less than 1 per week, but better than other sites in the network. In contrast with these other sites, all the newest postings are available immediately for download. On the other sites, they have recently implemented a policy of making members wait for 28 days before they can download.

All in all, a good addition to a network of sites that is quite large. However, the rough sex is undoubtedly not for everybody.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Meat Members

75. Meat Members (0)

Jay G (67) 09-18-09  06:29pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Large variety of videos and pictures on over 50 sites includes interesting and strange scenes.

2. I've joined Meat Members many times over several years and the price just keeps getting better: First time I joined it was about $35, then $29.95, now with the Best Porn Discount it's just $17.95/mo USD for tons of content.
Cons: 1. Very, very slow downloads.

2. Content per site is much more limited than before with apparent "recycling" of old content as new after a hiatus of sorts. As a member many times before, there was a lot more content then for each site; now there are more sites with less content on each.

3. New system for finding content is now more poorly set up than before, and content-finding is very hit-and-miss. For example, put in the first letter of a model's name and thumbnails of scenes appear in no apparent order (definitely not alphabetical). You can't search by typing in a whole name. While the new setup makes it look like you can search all sites more quickly (similar to category and site-search found on other networks), the searches are very disorganized and lead to grainy thumbnails that don't seem very appealing at all and don't do justice to the actual content....so it's pretty much searching for the needles in the haystack.
Bottom Line: Despite its second-class content and site search functions, there's still some good stuff on this network (that's why I keep coming back). The lower price makes me willing to put up with the less appealing elements mentioned above.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 51-75 of 200 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Easy Site Search
Advanced Search

Most Reviews
1. Hard X (2)
2. Southern Bukkake (2)
3. Punish Teens (1)
4. Face Fucking (1)
5. Assylum.com (1)
6. ALS Scan (1)

View All : Most Reviews

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.16 seconds.