Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Public exhibitionism porn with a little disgracing.
470 scenes that include downloadable videos and photos.
Broad array of models are featured here, shapes, sizes, colors.
The outdoor scenes are my favorite and are the best examples of public exhibitionism I have seen.
The scenes are full of different fetishes. Anal, DP, multiple cumshots, hose, legs, oral, vaginal, sex toys, it's the closest I have seen to a site that brings up the old saying of "everything but the kitchen sink".
Cons:
Stopped updating in January of 2019, the site had a banner on it that said there was going to be new content over the summer, but it never transpired.
The newer scenes feel more contrived. There's less feeling of spontaneity.
Bottom Line:
This is the type of site I could really get into. The majority of scenes start with a naked woman being walked around in public or displayed indoors for people to look at. The disgrace part is usually not that disgraceful.
The scenes all have a familiar start, but after the start there really is no way to know where the scene is going. I think that's a very important part of a niche site like this. You know the woman is going to have sex, probably anal sex, probably oral sex and get cummed on, but you don't know how many guys are going to be involved, if another woman is going to show up and maybe give her oral or use a Magic Wand on her or where they will end up as far as the location.
I didn't list it as a pro or con, but one part I think falls between those is the length of the scenes. Some of these scenes are over an hour long and they can be tiresome to the viewer. Just when you think they've settled into a position, they change positions, change rooms or locations and everything starts over again. I'm not for sure how to grade that part. It's good in some scenes and very distracting in other scenes.
I do know that most of the scenes are very hot even if you want to grab them and tell them to stop moving around so much. The women on this site seem to be well-prepared for the multiple penetrations and that takes away the disgrace part for me. You will see a few acts of what I would call violence, like slaps and spitting, but usually the woman is as aggressive as the men.
I don't think no new updates hurts it unless you already have all the scenes. At 470 scenes, most averaging nearly an hour, it's not likely that you're going to run out of this content if you're really into it.
The public part could be questioned as a lot of the scenes are indoors with an audience. This is like the previous might be a pro, might be a con, I think some of the hottest scenes on it are the indoor ones. Maybe it just makes the performers more comfortable.
The production quality is good, but I do think they could use more direction or more cameras. Sometimes the action is focused on where there's not much action.
It's still a very good site on an excellent network and worth checking out if you're into exhibitionism.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very big network dedicated to fetishes - 52 different sites.
The site works well. Probably better if you know what niche/fetish you are looking for.
Some mainstream fetishes like feet, hose and BDSM. Some fetishes that I believe are rare these days, including 3 sites with models that are smoking cigarettes, some bondage that makes Kink look tame and some like Brutal Castings, that are hard to even watch.
They do feature series videos that are interesting, both in story and how the scenes play out. There's not enough of those.
Quite possibly the corniest fetish -- hypnotized models. Those are entertaining to watch.
Cons:
I know this shouldn't be a con since it is a fetish network, but some of the content is extremely hardcore, maybe the most hardcore I've seen.
Navigation isn't very good, there's no model list, but you can click a model's name in a scene and see all of her scenes.
Can't tell if it's updating and number count looks lower than the last TBP review.
Bottom Line:
This is the definition of a hit or miss network. About 20 of the sites are interesting to me, with 10 getting most of my attention. The other 20 are ones I'm not interested in at all.
I am into foot fetish and hose. They have over 500 scenes pertaining to foot fetish and/or hose. That's my money worth.
These series which they list as sites have some very good, interesting scenes with stories: Waitress POV, Teen Creeper, Teens in the Woods, Helpless Teens, Hostel XXX, Operation Escort, Internet Creeper, and Strap-On Squad. They just don't have enough of those. Five of those sites have 20 or less scenes on them. Three have 10 or less.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The older scenes are not as consistent. Some don't list what the download's resolution is and there is only one option to download "high".
The quality is overall very good.
I think the site Pantyhose Creep is maybe the most interesting one for me, but it only has 44 scenes on it.
I counted around 3,500 scenes, it's not exactly easy to count these as they list all 52 sites one page with a number out from it. I'm not going to sit here and punch 52 numbers into a calculator. I went over the numbers in my head and came up about 600 short of the last TBP review. It's possible I'm missing something or not counting something, but that shows the problem with the navigation as well.
It's a good, somewhat confusing network if you are into fetishes. I think those that like foot/hose would be as pleased with the network as I am. If you're into the really rough sex you would probably like some of the sites on here. Those into bondage, they have 10 different sites with bondage as the main theme.
I don't think it's updating. I accidentally forgot to cancel it and am on the second month of my membership. I haven't noticed any new scenes and there's not a tab for "updates". They have a good and different network here, but they do need to put a little work into making it more functional and easier to find what you're looking for.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+4K is available for every video right down to 270p, this is rare
+Fabulous production values captured in a manner entirely separate from its companions, cinema-like standards makes you feel agog
+Light BDSM, male domination focus no extreme kinks/apparatus here straight and lesbian
+100 videos from when I left last month, 20-70 mins length each (35 mins average)
+Update schedule at every five days
+Images (avg. 100 per shoot) available in 3000x2000 vice versa, some of them look wonderful
+Much like the others, Deeper is packed with the most esteemed and celebrated performers
+Scenes are shot in various environments
+Favourite and customise your own collection of talent and content
+Rate videos and models
+Comment on videos
+Similar black interface to Blacked Raw, simple navigation
+Deals page has discounts for other sites
+Very friendly and responsive director, Kayden Kross in the comments
Cons:
-No additional access to other sites
-Some scenes have intrusive spotlights, others have tragic lighting which create tedious experiences – generally the videos have dark lighting which I dislike
-Content is bland considering the moniker, stories are paper thin and compared to what I was expecting
-Model aesthetic differs from other Lansky sites
-Some shoots feature music that is too loud or lasts too long, should fade out much earlier
-Sizeable files, 4K range from 4GB to 11GB and 1080p from 2GB to 6GB etc
-Tragic search engine remains, no advanced searching available
-Can’t rerate scenes or models even if you’ve made a mistake
-Site can time out after some inactivity
-Notification bell cannot be disabled
-Little info on model profiles, only a brief bio
-Thumbnail previews only work on the main page (latest six updates)
-Oldest videos have no accompanying image sets
-No TBP Discount
-No downloadable trailer previews, could be handy with these file sizes
Bottom Line:
Extra information:
No condoms (my preference)
A preface if you will. One weakness I’ve identified among Lansky’s sites are repetitive stories. While I praise his glam oriented vision, occasionally I felt that his production values would provide leverage. Good, creative stories freshen content up and can help combat the monotony folks at PU identified so I’m unsure why it’s low on the priority list. For me his sites are in the supreme bracket across the entire porn tree, but indeed this is a blemish overlooked.
By bringing Deeper into the fold, my interest was instantaneous as the name alone is possibilities galore, they could fill voids that have long been overdue: content with story behind it. Kayden Kross of TrenchcoatX was identified as an important figure to embark on this new project. She packed her bags to shift here from her old site, replacing the latter site and is thus at the helms of Deeper. I’m unsure of the semantics, but that’s the gist of it. You can search for TrenchcoatX but the link will redirect you here instead.
Deeper is the newest addition to Lansky’s ever-growing glam matrix. As mentioned before, this one is very much unlike its companions. Presentation wise. I would class their videography as a lush, premium blend of cinematic porn, with elements of gonzo through certain cuts and captures. Naturally you’ll think of Sex Art, but not so fast. They shoot material that could be stripped from shows and movies in my opinion. Not that it’s a bad thing by any means. Anyhow, it appears they’re trying the inquisitive and curious approach. All videos are available up to 4K, they aren’t messing around here. The talent pool is also unsurprisingly chock full of the most fabled adult stars kicking.
Let’s crack on. Needless to say, the moniker alone should depict a greater focus on story but I found that the emphasis I’ve been chasing hasn’t really been met. Instead, Kayden is churning out more BDSM material compared to her earlier work which I’m not keen on. It has its appeal, males dominating women through light BDSM but I think Deeper could and should be more. I don’t mind the odd shoot on it but recently it’s become so lopsided on that niche. Yawn, it’s just not my cup of tea - they should mix things up like they did before like with Lesbian content and amp up the dialogue.
Despite the intimate shots, the light-handed stories blot and hollow my curiosity, wasted potential. The natural model presentation Lansky is known for isn’t the same here either. Bright nail polish and lipstick are copiously used on newer material. I can appreciate a new site carving a distinguishable position among its siblings but thematically it’s not very cohesive. Over the years, Lansky’s beauty aesthetic played a major role on cannoning his body of work and name to the pinnacle. It’s off-kilter for this value to not follow suit in these parts.
More issues surface. While videos are exceptionally crisp, I don’t enjoy all aspects of it. The lens flare doesn’t add much and is at times obnoxious, but the lighting is another story altogether. It can get very bad. Some scenes contain a distracting spotlight, others would be disastrously unlit to the extent you see little to nothing of interest. It’s not very provocative if that’s the goal - they verge on unwatchable for me. Generally the videos have dark lighting which I’m not on board with. I also find it bizarre that some supplementary image sets are in settings that do not match with the video. This concerns the action, not solo imagery.
The more videos I watch, the more I’m unsure whether it belongs under the Lansky umbrella. Not because the quality isn’t there (it certainly is) but because it differs so much aesthetically. It hasn’t fit in snugly as I’d hoped. It’s an awkward one because it’s arguable that the Raw sites differ in that aspect as well. Either way, the name “Deeper” is ingenious. In theory it should yield a virtually bottomless pit of ways to get creative. At the moment though, they are not maximising their possibilities and potential to boot. Their content is quite inconsistent, varying from stylishly elegant to basic run of the mill couple porn or light BDSM with little bite to it. The model aesthetic bothers me as well. I don’t mind Deeper switching things up, but for me that’s a Lansky core that should be adhered to. Their older updates were better.
Expectation got the better of me. I have no aspirations of returning in the near future because for all intents and purposes, I found them underwhelming and bland even with regular updates. They need more creativity and dialogue to ascend to something greater. Something “Deeper”. Inside the Lansky fortress, this is the first site I’ve found pretty mediocre honestly. It didn't give me that wow factor. Give it a shot if you’re into these kinks. Perhaps it’s for you.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The biller is Rocketpay. I have had positive experiences with them.
-Comes with the Kink Network of 66 sites
-Discount through Pornusers
-Archive of 112 updates
-Very big name pornstars.
-Very educational, making this site unique
Cons:
-Not updating any longer. The last was in February of 2016.
Bottom Line:
The Kink Network was reviewed at 88 by The Best Porn and 89 by Rabbits Reviews. On Pornusers Wraith gave it a score of 85, Exotics a 94 and Pyrenees a 95. Kink University has not been reviewed by The Best Porn, but it was rated at 69 by Rabbits Reviews. On Pornusers marcdc1 reviewed it at 91 and Rear Admiral at 88.
There are presently 112 videos available. It is no longer updating and the last was in February of 2016.
The director of the University is Danarama and he costars with some big name pornstars such as Nina Hartley, Abella Danger, Lorelei Lee, London River, Bella Rossi, Daisy Ducati, Mona Wales, Charlotte Sartre, Holly Heart, Siouxsie Q, Emma Haze, Isis Love, Penny Barber and Bobbi Starr. There are both black and Asian women.
The videos are explanations with demonstrations of how to safely do many of the things that are to be found on Kink, which specializes in BDSM. Some examples are fisting, flogging, caning, pegging and lots more.
I am not really into all of that and never expect that I would use these videos as a reference. I am keeping nine videos that are of a more general interest.
I have kept videos about blowjob basics, humiliation, anal, pornstar sex tricks, cunnilingus, analingus, oral play and oral taste test which analyzes different diets and how they affect the taste of oral sex both on men and women. Especially enlightening Is one on how to make a woman squirt. This is very interesting and most definitely something not to be found on your everyday pornsite. The videos are very hot porn, as well as very useful. The explanations are very detailed and easy to understand.
As part of a huge network at a discounted price, it was diverting and somewhat enlightening. As porn it is unique I know of no other site anywhere like this.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
It is rare, in my opinion, to see a site of unique, fetish content on a network -- House of Taboo is that.
Over 1,250 videos and 1,250 photo sets.
They are only averaging a couple updates per month, but there is a huge, excellent network included (DDF).
Should appeal to those that believe sites like Kink are too hardcore or too fetish-heavy. This is more like mainstream porn meets their kinky friend for a night of fun.
Rarely seen props and contraptions; in my opinion, these are probably made for DDF to be less strenuous or stressful on the models.
Very mainstream porn models are even in these scenes. With the content being exclusive I would think those are rarities.
Cons:
Some of the models look overwhelmed even in the lesser restrictive bondage and props.
Not a high percentage, but 10% of the scenes don't even use a fetish. Maybe their costumes are the fetish? It's not a big deal.
Bottom Line:
Kink's Network is my favorite bondage, BDSM network, but House of Taboo shows a lighter, more mainstream accessible side to bondage and BDSM.
I couldn't possibly cover all the niches and fetishes they cover. You do see a common theme of light bondage. It could be the model's hose tying her legs open or bounding her arms behind her back. They use minor ball and gag devices as well. They have scenes with what I believe in a homemade pillory, head/hands through holes to present the model as helpless.
In the cons, I mentioned some of the models looking overwhelmed. For some viewers of this type of content that is a good thing. When you watch bondage porn both the male and female are usually equally experienced and adept at using the bondage. You don't get that feeling here. You feel like the woman just had her arms bound behind her for the first time. I wasn't for sure if that is a con or pro. Experienced bondage sex can become repetitive. I listed it as a con because that could bother some viewers. It doesn't me. The House of Taboo scenes are entertaining and most of the time you see a very enthusiastic struggle from the female model. In my mind, they are torn between fighting the bondage and submitting to enjoy the sex.
One of the biggest differences between House of Taboo and a site like Sex and Submission is the amount of major star models on House of Taboo. The scenes are on the harder side of mainstream hardcore, including double penetrations, bound mouth with anal and even bound mouth and hands double penetration.
The newer scenes (last 12-18 months) could pass for Kink scenes, that is how hardcore they are becoming. I will share a tip to look at the older content if you are looking for the less hardcore. The older content has more girl/girl scenes and lighter fetishes like urinating/nurse watching and even a fucking machine similar to Kink's.
It is a steady progression and there is content from 2006 - current.
I have not had any problems using the site. It could be a little better with helping me (you, anyone) find similar scenes to the ones we like. They have tags and they work well, but I have seen some scenes that the tags are not right on.
If you are a downloading type, the photo sets can be downloaded and this genre is a good one for photos. I prefer their download options of videos. They have 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. The sites with too many options make it easy to click the wrong one. The streaming player is okay, it buffers a lot when I use it, but it could be my internet connection. The older videos do not have streaming option. They only offer downloads on those.
You also receive 16 other sites with the network. There have content in all of the mainstream categories.
House of Taboo is either my 1st or 2nd favorite site on the network. I will try to cover the fetishes I see the most often on it: urinating, light bondage, rough girl on girl, dual penetration, anal, costume (usually latex suits and masks) and props that could be as simple as a ball gag to a pillory. If I could fix one thing about it it would be more updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. Plenty of top tier talent
2. Site has been around for years so it has a large library.
3. Frequently updated
4. Top notch fetish themed videos.
5. Great download speeds
6. Older videos have been re-uploaded, joined together and in the mp4 format.
Cons:
1. Site is showing it's age
2. Videos are small by today's standards.
3. As in ALL porn, scenes are repetitive but even more so here as it is a nitch network but it's what we came here for so it's a very minor neg.
4. A bit expensive at $39.99 a month ($29.95 if joined through the best porn link)
Bottom Line:
My bottom lines are short and sweet and directly to the point. Note: I never score higher than 95, a top score always makes me think a webmaster is trying to entice new customers.
I have been a member of some of their sites on and off for years and loved the content. I was thrilled when I joined last year after a long absence to find that not only did they become a network but re-uploaded their older scenes joined together and in mp4 format. That is a massive accomplishment because their catalog is freaking huge and still growing steadily.
Videos are well shot and in my opinion are top notch.
Videos feature dom/sub bondage themes. This isn't your daddy's porn!
Now to my two biggest cons:
1. Site is in need of an remodel. It hasn't changed much in years. Notice I said REMODEL instead of OVERHAUL. The site is old and needs a few tweaks but is far from a train wreak. While the site is functional is just looks old and could seriously benefit from a facelift. The model index is quirky in that when clicked on opens up on either the newest or most popular models with no way to sort. I did find a workaround though: search a model name then when it loads delete the name in the search line and hit enter with it blank. Now it brings up a fully functional model index that can be sorted by male/female, body type, boobs, hair color, pubic hair, and ethnicity.
2. The videos are quite small by today's standards. The highest they offer is 720p. This is even the case with the most recent uploads. This for me is a very big deal, both of my monitors are full 1080p and I have a 4K tv connected to my pc so the 720 size always looks a bit fuzzy. This is the only site I have come across that doesn't offer 1080p and 4K on their newest videos. I can forgive 4K as that format has yet to be integrated on half the sites I frequent. Most of the sites nowadays have only three size videos: 1080, 720, and whatever size for mobile. I'm sure they shoot on digital cameras so I don't know why they don't offer at least a 1080 size. This is another issue that could be addressed in a site remodel, ditch the outdated sizes and come up to industry standard.
So to finish up, starting at 95, -4 for the outdated site, -2 for the expensive membership, and another -4 for the video sizes. I wouldn't join this site without a discount but do love the content.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Men begging for a pegging.
Most of the scenes are believable.
Around 450 scenes with new scenes being added twice a month.
An underrated niche that is -- according to research -- more common than we think.
Some of the scenes lead you into the what did I just watch feeling, but most of the guys believably enjoy being dominated by the wide array of Kink models.
Included with the Kink network, which has 83 other Kink sites.
Cons:
A few of the women models do not do a very good job of convincing the viewer they are dominating the man.
I would like to see gangbang action, 3 or 4 women with strap-ons, taking turns on the guy.
Going against the first con, some of the women do too good of a job of convincing they dominated the man.
Bottom Line:
I have been a member of Kink's network since the launch day. I like the debauchery of their content.
Divine Bitches is my favorite Kink site. It is not perfect. None of the Kink sites are. You have to come into these sites with a suspension of disbelief. That is why Divine Bitches is a good site for me. The guys do a believable enough job of making you think they are willing to let the woman stick her dildo up their butt - just so they can get closer to her. I have seen numbers as high as 20% of married couples have experimented with pegging. Of the married couples I know, the number is even higher.
There is not a lot of story in these scenes. Kink sometimes can get too deep into a story. The setting and feel of the scenes has changed over the years. The older scenes relied on a very attractive female model seducing her boy toy into bending over for her. He was usually given -- in trade -- vaginal intercourse with her. The settings included doctor's offices, bedrooms, hotels, the more recent scenes go to a more dominant style of the female giving him no choice. He could be tied up, blindfolded, whipped into submission or in a few of the newer ones, the female is much bigger physically.
All Kink scenes have a short part at the end where the males, females involved in the scene talk about the experience and how much they enjoyed it.
There are scenes that include cuckolds. Those are not common, but are as believable as any cuckold scene is. It usually involves the acting wife to use her strap-on on her acting husband, in his butt, in his mouth, while the other man has sex with her or receives a blowjob from her.
This is common on Kink, the older scenes, are usually the best ones. One disappointment for me is Kink seems to no longer look for that one model that can consistently pull the niche/scene off. Mia Little has been featured several times in the last year; she is good at this niche, but they almost always put the man in bondage.
My favorite recent scene features Aaliyah Love dominating Corbin Dallas. As small as she is and as many times as she has been the submissive one, she seems to channel an inner dominatrix. Her and Corbin seem to really enjoy the scene.
The scenes are very long for scenes without much story and with usually only two people -- averaging in the 50 minutes to 70 minutes range -- you get your money's worth out of these scenes.
I would be remiss to say some straight men probably would not like this content. Some of the scenes do get very rough. There are some in the older scenes where you think the guy's balls are going to literally explode from the rope torture. The content has been toned down now. It is like watching a regular porn scene except it does not start with the woman on her knees, but she usually is on her knees at the end of the scene.
With a year subscription, I do not download a lot, the scenes can be very large in file size. Their streaming player works very well for me. Against the type of site it is, some of the best scenes, are the ones where the woman starts to laugh -- in a feeling sorry for him way. I would like to see them bring more of the mainstream models in to shoot these scenes. There are several scenes where the female pats the male on the back and hugs him like she is sorry she is doing that bad thing to him.
I like the dark humor in Kink's style of porn and Divine Bitches does dark humor as good as any of their sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some story to the scenes
- A-list models
- High production values
- Affiliated with other high-quality sites
- 86 scenes
- New scene added every five days
- Multiple resolutions offered
- Photos available
- Logical, usable site design
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- No TBP discount
- I’ve had problems with this company/biller combination in the past
Bottom Line:
I joined Deeper because every other site under the Mad Cheddar umbrella is a Greg Lansky site and I like his work. (Tushy, Blacked, Vixen, etc.) I figured this would be another Lansky site and fully expected that I’d like it just as much. It turns out that it isn’t a Lansky site and it’s quite different from what I expected and from what I would normally subscribe to but I like it and I’m glad I joined. While the site seems to be a collaboration between several porn stars it appears that Kayden Kross is now the primary director for scenes here.
Describing the scenes available here isn’t easy as there is a wide variety. They all appear to be loosely story-based though the similarity ends there. Some are a little rough with some playful bondage while others could be called couples-oriented* or Glamcore. Another commonality is that the site hires only A-list models and all the scenes have class-leading production values. (This is a clear link to the Lansky sites.) The scenes are all ‘standard’ porn in that the site offers two-ways, three-ways and lesbian scenes. Anal, however, is rare.
I’ve read on other forums where Deeper has been accused of pulling a fast one in that the scenes are all or mostly from a site called TrenchcoatX. While this is true, I don’t think Deeper is trying to pull a fast one. In fact, they link to Deeper at TrenchcoatX. I think, but I’m not certain, that TCX is a VOD site and it may not allow downloads. Now that TCX is a large enough site it seems that they have spun off Deeper as their traditional subscription-based site that allows downloads. I’m not 100% certain about this but it is an educated guess based on time spent on both sites. It also appears that Deeper may have some exclusive scenes.
The site is currently quite large with 86 scenes available. The site continues to grow with a new scene being added every five days.
The scenes are available to stream (with only one resolution) and to download with seven resolutions available: 270p, 360p, 480 Mobile, 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. I found bitrates to be better than average on all resolutions and the scenes showed no pixilation or stuttering on playback.
Photos are available as singles or zips in a 2000x3000 size.
The site layout is simple, logical and easy to use. It uses the same layout as all the other Mad Cheddar sites so if you’ve subscribed to one of those you’ll feel at home here. The scenes can be sorted by date, by star and tags are also available.
I had no issues using a download manager to queue the scenes and I found download speeds to be on par with or better than other sites of this calibre.
I can’t point to any specific negatives on this site though I have had trouble with the combination of Mad Cheddar and the biller they now use, VXNBILL. I’ve had three instances of unauthorized memberships being charged long after I’ve cancelled so I’ll be keeping an eye on my card.
The other minor negative is that the site doesn’t offer a TBP discount though when I joined there was no discount offered but it happened that they were offering a $10 Memorial Day special. Let’s hope they make us PU members an offer we can’t refuse.
The bottom line is that while this site is not what I expected and not what I’d usually subscribe to I like the site itself and what it has to offer. The scenes are all A-list models in scenes with a bit of a storyline and high production values. The scenes are offered in multiple resolutions and download speeds are good. If you like high-quality porn with a storyline and a bit of an edge this site is worth looking at. Now if they’d only offer us a bit of an incentive…
*Caveat: I like sites like Hookup Hotshot and Legal Porno so I may not be the best judge of what is truly couples-oriented.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large network
Quality Videos
Cons:
Some sites no longer updating
Poor search features
Lack of variety of models
Repetitive themes
Bottom Line:
I have subscribed to a couple of Kink.com sites off and on for almost a decade now. My favorite sites were Ultimate Surrender and Fuck Machines. Kink use to not be a network and you would have to subscribe to their sites on an individual basis. This could be bad for some and good for other.
I personally preferred the sites separate as more attention to detail was giving. A good example of this was Ultimate Surrender's model stat page. Back in the day I could search a model's stats and view the videos she either lost or won. This feature has been taking away since kink decided to make the site a network.
The models (female models) range from slender to somewhat curvy. Within the last year they have included one bbw model. Scenes get repetitive with the same look for each model. This is a minor grip as I understand this is a personal preference for me.
My last issue with the site is repetitive themes. You have two or more sites that have the same exact concept for it. An example of this would be Men in Pain and Divine Bitches, which both involve female domination and male subs. I think they would be better off having one big site rather than two or three with the same exact niche.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The much-maligned public sex site of the Kink network.
- There are a few newer sites that are trying to do the same genre and niche but Public Disgrace, to me, is the best at it and you get access to the Kink network too.
- Very good download speeds, 80% and up of my max.
- All of the scenes over the last year and a half are at least 50 minutes long and some are over an hour. (The importance of this will be in the BL)
- Still has that Kink style of quirkiness in the majority of the scenes.
- Though I think the creativity has dropped a little over the years, they're still setting the bar for production values.
- For this type of content, their catalog is huge, by my count they have 481 scenes. Most sites like this one have less than 100. And they update twice a month, like clockwork, including sometimes three times a month if the weeks fall right.
- If you're just focused on this site or one of the others on the network the navigation is very good.
Cons:
- I think they still have some problems with laws, you kind of get the feeling that it might disappear one day and never come back.
- If you're not careful the content can seem to be very repetitive but it's probably not fair to say that considering it's public sex.
- Another one for those who like to nitpick, not all scenes are truly "public". All scenes do have a crowd of people watching but seem to be in controlled environments.
Bottom Line:
Public Disgrace pushed boundaries when it first opened. The mere thought of what their scenes had them would make most people's eyes bug out of their head. They have a model or in a few cases, models, meet them somewhere usually public, could be a bus, could be a park, could be a bus stop, an adult video store or pretty much anywhere public you can think of. Most of the scenes start with the model being stripped, bound by rope and led around a city. If that makes you laugh or smile you'll probably love this site. In some of the scenes they stay in fairly public place but I've never been fully convinced that any of these areas aren't controlled environments. Does that take away from the experience? Not for me.
The model(s) is the most important part of the Public Disgrace scenes. Some are either really horny or wanting to leave a good impression. Those models are touching the clothed people while two guys are double penetrating her. Some are not as involved with the crowd and whether it's fair or not, those scenes fall pretty flat for me.
There's even a comment here on PU about when Kink was shutting Public Disgrace down. And they were down for awhile but out of nowhere, they showed back up and started updating again. This is the biggest compliment I can give this site and Kink overall:
This site is why I join Kink's network with year memberships. There's months that I only get two new scenes then the lucky ones with three and I think those scenes alone are worth the subscription price. I like other sites on the Kink Network but I could join once a year to get those scenes. The Public Disgrace updates are ones I don't want to wait for.
Not to advertise a different site but to show how difficult this style is, especially in the United States, Brazzers had Asses in Public. It was similar to Public Disgrace without bondage. The last time I was on Brazzers, Asses in Public only had a dozen or so scenes. It used to have near 100 but they had to take some of them down. Public Disgrace/Kink obviously spends a lot of time making sure they are cleared to shoot this style of porn.
You will notice a difference in the scenes if you go back and watch scenes from the first few years compared to now but I do believe in the last year and a half, their scenes have improved from where they were. The was a lull when no new scenes were coming out then they went to shorter scenes that were 20-30 minutes long. As mentioned in the pros, the last year and a half has scenes that are at least 50 minutes and a few go near 75 minutes. In this style of porn (exhibitionism, voyeurism, especially), that's a big deal. It gives more time for the buildup, the parts that don't look as controlled. You also get to see the model often laughing, sometimes blushing and I think that helps keep Kink on the "good guys" list as it shows the model's willingness to be involved in this debauchery.
The Kink quirkiness: This is the only porn studio I know of that surprises me. Sometimes it's something goofy like for those Game of Thrones fans, shortly after the Cersei "Walk of Shame", Kink put two nude models in a near identical walk of shame scene. There's psychology going on there since they know a lot of guys and women too were aroused by the Game of Thrones scene. There's more too, like the elderly man who jumps into a scene and starts groping a model. Is it staged and planned? Maybe but it's more than other studios are doing.
This site itself has 481 scenes as of 8/14/2018, they do have pictures but I still haven't seen a way to download them. I would think only the public pictures would be of any value to a viewer since you might see things you didn't catch in the video.
I'll mention that in my Kink Network review, I said Public Disgrace now has a subtitle of "Sluts in Spain". I'm not for sure why they did that other than to release two scenes that I assume were shot in Spain. I don't know where the majority of these scenes are shot but do know in the older scenes, there are some from San Francisco. I thought the Sluts in Spain was their new main location to film from since their header had the subtitle in it but it does seem to be just a few scenes as the newest scenes no longer say it.
It takes brave people to do these scenes. I would imagine performing in front of even planned audience members, would make it difficult for some models (both the males and females). Public Disgrace does by far the best job of it and their models, overall, are the most believable in this style of porn.
I do not list their video resolution as a con, anymore. The videos max out at 720p resolution but with the scenes being around an hour each, anything bigger on the resolution and the file sizes would be massive to download. It's still not perfect but it's well-above similar sites and in a class of its own.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. Nice high quality camera work
2. Large selection of movie types
3. Large number of movies available
4. Movies are a good length
Cons:
1. Very low down load limit per day. 3 to 15 HD movies per day.
2. Hard to unsubscribe from. (Seriously why make dead unsubscribe pages, you're just driving people away)
3. They try to add on expensive services when you sign up.
4. They sell your contact information without asking. (Possibly they ask in their privacy statement)
5. Movies get repetitive very quickly due to lack of original ideas
Bottom Line:
Why do some sites treat their customers like this? These are people willing to pay you money for your site!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the most unique and largest networks on the internet.
- Kink covers lots of ground in niches, also there is a large variety of models (body type, race, hair length, etc...).
- I have seen others say they have DL speed problems but I haven't had any. I download at 85% of my max download speed.
- Depending on your depth of interest in varied niches, one could easily say this network has the most value of any network.
- The network continues to grow and offers access to 71 sites. Will detail in BL.
- Update schedule is inconsistent but there's right at 2 updates per day (across the network).
- High quality throughout but not HD (720p max).
Cons:
- There's the obvious; Kink's content isn't for everyone but I do think most people could find at least a few of the sites appealing.
- Navigation is okay but it can be frustrating thanks to so much content (across the network) and some poorly tagged scenes.
- It's hard to say a network with 71 sites is losing steam but they do have their times when the content is inconsistent from scene to scene.
Bottom Line:
The first time I reviewed the Kink network it was right after they had launched the full network. I was shocked to see so many sites I had joined before but with the network all were available for 1 price. The old saying of "Too much of a good thing is never enough" doesn't really apply here. I can't imagine how someone could go through this whole network in a month, even two or three months, if I'm focused, I can scour two or three sites, download what I want, in about a month. You definitely get your money's worth.
The basis of Kink's content is in bondage, rough(er) scenes, light torture, excellent production values including costumes and sets. Because the number of sites it comes with keeps growing, I'm going to list them in groups so you can see the amount of depth this network has. I will separate gay men, transsexual, into their own groups. The rest includes male with female, female with female, groups.
Then there are these that are straight male, woman and some bisexual women but these focus more on the women dominating men and/or women (asterisk is dominating men):
I really have trouble believing any network or even DVD site has that many genres and niches covered under one subscription. Similar to Pink Panther's comment about Evil Angel having filters to filter out content you don't want to see, Kink also gives you the ability to filter out the transsexual and/or gay content.
There's a few things I have noticed this time as a member. One of my favorite Kink sites is Public Disgrace, it has had its share of controversy over the years but I now notice it is named, "Public Disgrace ... Sluts In Spain", all the archive content is still there and up until June 2018, they had been releasing 2 scenes per month. Only one in June and none so far in July.
Overall, it feels like the updates have slowed somewhat. The amount of sites is also much higher than it usually advertises, 71 to 23 that TBP advertises. But a lot of those sites are newer and don't have a lot of content on them. I also don't remember if the gay content used to be counted in the Kink network.
My interest in the network hasn't changed much. Public Disgrace is still one of my favorite sites. Ultimate Surrender is a great site but in moderation as the content does become repetitive. Fucking Machines features a lot of more mainstream models. Sex and Submission is as accessible as 95% of hardcore/bondage DVDs you'll find. The Upper Floor is still as far-reaching as it ever was. I'm under the impression at this point that its goal was never really realized so they just use it as a roleplaying/rich/wealthy society type fetish. There really is something for everyone and they do have pictures available for download but those vary from site to site.
The only technical knock is one that has been there for years and it's that the videos are 720p. I've told this before, that's my preferred video resolution so it's not a big deal to me. More importantly, the Kink scenes are relatively long compared to most porn scenes, some go over an hour each, so even the 720p versions are often 3-4 GB each. The only real disappointment I ever have with the Kink network is the lack of time. They have content of two of my favorite "softer" models, Lana Lopez and Satine Phoenix but I usually forget to download them. On average, I keep a membership here 6 months out of each year but a lot of times, I won't visit it for 2-3 months at a time. My score is a little lower than my first review of the network but that's because of the lesser updates, especially Public Disgrace and the newer sites not updating enough to make up for the older sites slowing down. It's still the best of non-mainstream porn and the best value as well.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique site
- Authentic, hard BDSM
- 163 scenes
- Updates weekly
- Hot models
- Zany scenes
- Multiple resolutions available
- 4K for additional cost (yes, I see that as a pro. Please see below for an explanation.)
- No download limits
- Supports download managers
- TBP/PU discount
Cons:
- Slow download speeds
- Definitely not for casual BDSM fans (thats probably a pro depending on how you view it.)
Bottom Line:
My first review of Assylum was almost four years ago and there have been some key improvements, mostly almost four years of added scenes. Two criticisms I had of the site back then was that it was small and the relatively high price meant it wasnt a great value for the size of the site. The size of the site is definitely nothing to criticize now, with 163 unique scenes. There are also six interviews and BTS scenes and two Directors Cuts of a couple of classics. The site continues to update with the addition of one new scene per week. And to make the site a better value there is now a TBP/PU discount.
The other main difference between my first review and this one is that the original premise of a model showing up at the Assylum for therapy for some sexual perversion is mostly unused now. A message on the site from November 2017 notes that while the site wont give up completely on therapy they are going for more authentic domination and submission. Honestly, I dont see much of a difference and I dont mean that in a bad way. The scenes are still zany, over the top and unlike anything else Ive ever seen on the internet.
Being a BDSM site the scenes all have that as a theme and given the name of the site almost all of the sex is anal. Apart from anal sex there is a lot of anal play with insertions. Many of the scenes have some bondage. Watersports are frequent and f-on-m rimming is almost universal.
In his well-written and more recent review than my original one, mbaya takes a more negative view of some of what goes on in the scenes. His review is well worth reading too. Its just that mbaya sees a lot of the zaniness in a negative way where I see it in more of a positive way. (Like Olivia Kassidy in a cheerleader outfit with a piss enema being held in her ass by a butt plug and made to jump up and down while reciting degrading cheers. Well thats porn gold! No pun intended there)
The physical appearance of the models is something that mbaya and I also diverge on but he is definitely accurate when he notes the number of tattooed models. I suspect thats an occupational hazard in this porn niche. I find that a majority of the models are very attractive. I think that it is a credit to the site that they are able to attract so many A-list and beautiful models. Surely that has to say something about what goes on behind the scenes that the women feel safe and in control. Its also telling that some of the models have multiple scenes too. (Not counting the scenes theyve done for Assylums sister-site Slave Mouth.)
The main male talent (and site owner) seems to attract some negative attention. I dont share those thoughts. Sure, hes an average guy and he wears a mask in every scene but I dont find that detracts from the scenes at all. If anything, his average looks and mask add to the power imbalance that can be so hot in a BDSM scene.
The production values in the scenes are great: the lighting, sound, camera work and editing are all top-tier.
The scenes are available in three or four resolutions depending on your membership. 852x480 (700kb/s), 1280x720 (1800) and 1920x1280 (6500). 4K resolution is available if you pay for a premium membership. Some may criticize the site for charging more for 4K but I see it as the opposite. I dont need 4K and appreciate that I can pay a lower fee to avoid it.
The site supports download managers for queuing scenes. It also seems to support multiple simultaneous downloads. If the site once had a daily limit it either doesnt now or that limit is high. I downloaded a lot on my first day back and didnt hit a limit.
If the site has a flaw its download speeds. Ive noticed this in all the times Ive joined. I normally see 40+MB/sec on sites but this site seems to be capped at 4. Given that some of the file sizes are large (these are long scenes) it would take a long time to download a 4K file.
The only other criticism of this site must be obvious: it is most assuredly NOT for everyone. This is extreme BDSM with some sexual and non-sexual acts that would offend a lot of people. If youre a porn collector and prefer softer stuff this is not the site to dip your toe into the BDSM world. This site is authentic, hard and unique. Some of the S+M is hard enough to leave pronounced marks. Occasionally there are tears. But since we all have different tastes we should appreciate that there are sites that cater to a wide variety of niches.
So would I recommend this site? Absolutely if youre into hardcore BDSM; absolutely not if you arent. The site offers porn that is definitely not cookie-cutter. If you like authentic and unique BDSM with hot models in professionally shot scenes then this is a site worth exploring.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The extreme side of 21 Sextury, a network with 16 sites, the TBP review only lists 13.
- A little bit of everything from transsexual to lots of older with younger, will break it down in BL.
- Very good download speeds.
- Technical quality is high with 1080p option dating back to the 2010 range. Pictures are also of high quality and downloadable. The last few years pictures are over 5000 long end.
- Not for sure what the regular price is but I used the TBP very good discount of $9.95.
- Not nearly as many models as 21 Sextury but still 1,225 but that does include males too.
- I feel like a broken record on this one, has some very rare scenes of Euro models from the mid-2000s, yes, I had another hard drive problem and need to get those back.
- Navigation is very good for a network.
Cons:
- There's going to be content here that's not for everyone. This can vary from the actions to the models. Which is exactly what I think 21 Sextury was going for with this network. Different is good to me but a lot of people won't like it.
- I feel petty even saying this but their network lists updates for the entire network, there is a sidebar that lists all the sites available but maybe if the scenes had their site name under the preview photo?
- 13 updates in 30 days (May 2018) isn't very good for a network of 16 sites.
- Zoliboy hasn't updated since March 31, 2018, that was my favorite site on this network.
- Only 4 of the 16 sites are updating and a lot of the content on the sites not updating is from pre-2010.
Bottom Line:
21 Sextreme is different. There's transsexuals, 60-70 year old men with 18-22 year old women, 50-70 year old women with younger men, there's fisting, there's gynecology, domination, pissing and one of my old favorites, zoliboy. If you find yourself getting bored with the same content over and over you'll probably like this network.
This different style of porn isn't always for me. My porn interests seem to be from extreme to the other. My ideal porn is a pretty woman stripping her clothes off and masturbating. I rarely get tired of that but when I do, I just blame the model and find a different model. The varied content here is all captured in high quality videos and pictures. They're receiving a bonus 5 points just for having such high quality photosets on what is largely a video site.
I haven't noticed any 4k videos but there's 8 years of videos with 1080p option. I'm still happy with the 720p. Both the videos and pictures are easily distinguishable as 21 Sextury because of their warm colors and lighting.
Here's a list of the sites included. I'll list the active and updating first:
Grandpa's Fuck Teens (every other week) Lusty Grandmas (no set schedule, 7 updates in May)
Old Young, Lesbian Love (every other week) Teach Me Fisting (every other week)
That's it. Zoliboy was updated last on March 31, 2018, so maybe it's just taking a few months off but otherwise, nearly all the sites on this network have stopped updating. I think this shows the lack of updates better than anything, in May 2018, as of the 29th of May, there are 13 updates for May and that's across 16 sites.
Maybe isn't my place to say this but I think it's time to start including these sites with the 21 Sextury network or merging it with 21 Naturals.
The even worse part about these sites that aren't updating is the majority haven't been updated since 2010, meaning, much poorer video quality.
The good, at least for me, is the old content (mostly on Zoliboy) that included the top Euro "softcore" models from the mid-2000s. I had an accidental hard drive erase that deleted all of my 21Sextury, 21Sextreme content which included a very large collection of Eve Angel content. Also Anetta Keys too.
I don't know if I'm right or not and it probably doesn't matter but some of these sites look old DVD content. Also is worth mentioning that not all of the content is exclusive anymore as I've seen some of the 21Sextury content on Bang.com.
If you like old/young porn they seem to be focused on that niche right now but other than that or if you're a dumbass like me and deleted and entire hard drive and need to get some of your favorite content back, there really isn't much going on in this network. I don't know what has happened and do also have a membership to 21 Sextury network but haven't started looking at it to see if it is also dropping off this much. I didn't think I would ever see the day that 21Sextury was only putting out 13 updates in 30 days on an entire network.
The final score is generous since they at least kept the old content that I accidentally deleted and for the high quality photosets. Not for sure I want pictures of a 19 year old woman getting pounded by a grandpa but can't beat the technical quality. If you've never been a member and like the variety then I would recommend it for a month. If you've been here before and downloaded most of what you want, I can't say you're going to find much new.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- FemDom at its best
- Female Domination preformed by some of the
world's finest Dominas in real BDSM scenes
- A lot of BDSM and Fetish topics covered
- Movie quality is pretty good
- Unified movie type. All movies are HD or SD
MP4's
- Movies can be watched online or can be
downloaded
- All scenes have pictures which can be viewed or
downloaded in a zip file.
- Very good and helpful support
- Easy navigation due to clear top menus and page
numbers at the bottom each the page.
Cons:
- A few videos seems to be upgraded SD to HD
movies
- Basic search box. A faceted search with filters
would be an added value to this great website.
- A few videos are what I like to call instruction
videos. With all due respect but such videos are
not my cup of coffee.
- Scenes are not released as a whole but they have
what I like to call a modular update system in
which several scenes are updated in time. (cfr. The English Mansion type of update process.
- The website can be slow at times
- Information regarding Mistresses need some
updating
Bottom Line:
The owner / creator of this website has put a lot of thought in the title and name of the website. It reminds me a lot of the typical Hollywood films of the 50's. The sign up process is pretty straight forward and there are no cross sales. The Primary Payment Processor is CCBill the alternative one is Verotel. The scenes are called films. Site navigation is great but the search option can be reviewed. The general site performance can be slow at times. The site features 74 Mistresses from which the majority seem to be British or UK based. There is a Mistress index and additional information regarding the Mistresses but it can use some reviewing (broken links). All films can be viewed or downloaded in either HD or SD MP4. The file sizes are rather small (from 3:26 - 85:22 MB up to 2:31:00 - 1,91 GB). The site currently features 682 films. A bit pity that the films for the majority are rather short. Please note that all films which are released can also be downloaded and viewed in parts. A few films have been released in one part but the majority varies between 2 and 11 parts next to the complete film. Each film comes with pictures and varies between 5 and 118 pictures which can either be viewed (pic by pic or slideshow) or they can be download in a zip file. Video and picture quality are great. The site updates daily but films (scenes) are not released as one but rather in parts and often over several films (scenes). You can compare it with the update system of The English Mansion. Lots of BDSM and Fetish activities are very professionally preformed by Female Dominants. Films are shot in- and outside (Dungeon, office, Doctors cabinet, in a park,...). Sometimes you'll see one Mistress vs one or more slaves or two or more Mistress vs one or more slaves. Being a submissive in real life I often visit a Professional Female Dominant. I saw a lot of BDSM and Fetish activities I already experienced. Besides one of the Mistresses featured on this site is the one I'm hoping to visit next time. The FemDom content on this website is of very high quality and a lot of BDSM and Fetish activities are well and professionally covered. Please note that some Mistresses run their own Dungeon and have years of experience in BDSM. To the real FemDom enthusiastic this site is definitely a jewel. Their support is very great. I only took one month of membership but I will certainly renew my membership.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Ameatures (this will also be negative. While there are more "real" action and less acting. Many of the models look shell-shocked and not really enjoying themselves.)
- Lots of variety in age and body shape (little in ethnicity),
- British models - I love an accent
- Almost 150 vids as of December 1, 2017
- Lots of anal and squirting
- "degrading" is kept fun and playful (although there was too much spit play for my taste)
- MILF that are MILFS (c-section scars and stretch marks mean casting is done right
Cons:
- Ameatures - models don't always seem to be enjoying themselves
- Sound and lighting are sub par. Decent you can see the action but not high quality
- I recognized a couple of the models but most are unknowns (maybe this is just because I'm in the USA?)
- Some of the models are non-native English speakers which makes them hard to understand.
Bottom Line:
An enjoyable site. I'd like to see them grow more before I re-up my membership.
All in all an enjoyable site - but not worth the membership at this time. The network is also too small to help sell it.
I'd wait on buying for another year or two after they've had a chance to roll out more videos and improve the quality.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Premier kink content. Scenes are very heavy on BDSM - lots of spanking, whippings, gags, and discipline. Most scenes have an interesting setup with why the
- Includes access to 24 sites each with its own focus
- Updates once/2 weeks (approximately)
- Over 550 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top fetish models. If she's a big name she's probably worked here. There's also more diversity of ethnicity/body type/etc. than any other network, I can think of.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- pix available as .zip files
Cons:
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site has had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- Rather pricey - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here
-That quality comes at the cost of large files. This can be a little frustrating because each video contains an approximate 10-minute post-interview in which the model explains the good time she ha
Bottom Line:
The theme of most shoots a "slave" is trained. The earlier shoots typically show several "days" of training with new skills being developed each day.
I give this site a solid buy. The action is hot. There's a lot of it. Updates keep coming. There's plenty of variety. I think kink should keep this site going.
I enjoyed this site a lot - in fact, it's one of my favorites in the network. Like the rest of kink it's not for the faint of heart. There's lots of electricity play, fisting, gagging, anal, and "impact play". That said there is a pre and post interview to make clear that everyone enjoyed themselves during the shoot. I especially like the fact that top talent will shoot for kink. The scenes with Riley Nixon, Holly Micheals, Lyla Storm, and Allie James were particularly good
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Kink has a lot of pros:
1) As of today I count 11,262 videos
2) Their unique BDSM Content is without equal
3) Their is NO Download Limit, NO Download Limit
4) Even their oldest scenes have Trailers and photo sets! So their are a lot of Photo Sets in HD.
5) They have some of the best Porn Stars in Exclusive BDSM Sexual activities.
6) All of their Original Content is Exclusive
7) You can view their content by 36 categories or 40 unique Channels
8) They cater to all brands of BDSM Kink and to all genders. Strait, Bi, Gay and Trans.
9) Their membership has never been so affordable as it is now!
10) No cross check sales, simple to join, simple to cancel.
Cons:
Kink has a lot of Cons:
1) Their is no 4k HD and most of their content is lower quality 1080p than what other sites offer.
2) If you do not like BDSM then you will find next to nothing to enjoy on this site. It is a very niche site.
3) Their is NO Download limit. But occasionally you to need to pause and restart a download. And you might have to occasionally relog in.
4) Their older content is unique but some of it is terribly degraded with pixelation and frame tearing.
5) About half their porn is by non name porn stars with tattoos and not top tier bodies.
6) Recently they added some non exclusive content and it is far beneath their quality standard.
7) Their needs to be a better search engine (Like you can find on Bang!) because it is hard to find for example every DP scene, some simply fall through the cracks.
8) Sometimes their content can feel too calculated and not passionate enough.
Bottom Line:
The Good
How do I begin to talk about a site I have joined numerous times for over a decade long? I love this site. It is not the most hardcore site on the internet. But it does a good job of being just edgy enough to be realistic. I feel like this site has fallen on some hard times over the last few years because of politics and laws in the states it is shot in. But hopefully they will turn the corner and come out the other side refreshed and bring us the quality porn we all need and deserve.
This site still takes top talent like Carter Cruise and Ashley Adams and puts them through the paces. And for me that is the most important thing. Just keep hiring the best talent and your site can make a comeback.
The Bad
While it is true Kink is not in its prime anymore. Their is still hope that they might overcome their recent difficulties and come out the other side stronger than ever. But this is not entirely Kink's fault. Other sites with far fewer regulations have come out of no where and made some of their content seem tame.
My suggestions for Kink
It is time to push the envelope again. How about a few new sites? You guys could do spanking better than Elite Pain for example. The "light" spanking aspect of kink has always been my number 1 criticism of the site.
You also have a opportunity to have men and women wrestle in the ring then have sex with a lot of Frontal Doggy, Frontal Doggy is where it is as in my opinion in current porn and some of your old Sex and Submission videos catered to this very well.
Also you could make a Flexible Girl site where they have sex with men in a number of great flexible positions. Their is not enough good quality flexible porn but you can find some might fine flexible porn scenes on Kink. So why not play to that strength?
Also no one wants to see condoms so if you have to move to avoid them you are doing us all a service! Its a fine line between keeping a scene hot and protecting all of the actors and actresses.
The Bottom Line
The bottom line is their is NO better BDSM site on the internet even today. Think about the unique things Kink brings to the table. Women having sex with machines, Kink is the best. BDSM Gang Bang DP's, Kink is the best. Women Wrestling Women then having strap on sex, Kink is the best. The fact is kink is the best at the kinds of BDSM it does with the lone exception of spanking. Sure Kink could be a littler rougher in my opinion but they strike a great balance for all the rules, regulations and politics they currently have to deal with.
Look at kink this way. You used to have to pay upwards of 40$ PER Site to view Kink Content. And now you can get the entire library for $30 a month. Their is not great value that that. I will admit I joined during a sale but for a average price you get access to the king of BDSM porn. Kink is my number 1 suggested BDSM porn site and is one of my most trusted sites.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Huge. Even if you don't care about half the network, there's still tons of content.
- Good quality video
- Some storylines here and there.
- Big name and unknown models
- No constant logouts and re-login demands. Thanks, webmasters. Unfortunately, it makes the download limits much more obvious.
Cons:
- Strict download limits. Maybe not technically, but very much a thing.
- Lots and lots of wrestling. That may be pro to some.
- Pretty specific niches that aren't going to appeal to most.
- Lots of tattoos. It fits with the theme, I guess, but it's unusual to find models without them.
Bottom Line:
You've probably heard of Kink, even if it's just as a mental note to avoid. It's an enormous site. Like I said in the pros section, even if you don't have any interest whatsoever about half (or maybe even three quarters) of the content, there will still be tons of stuff for you to investigate.
The pros are pretty obvious. It's one of those binary sites that people are either going to say "yes, I'm going to join that eventually" or "nope, get me outta here." With that in mind I'm going to deal mostly with the drawbacks.
I was surprised to find lots and lots of rasslin. That might be a big draw to some, and if so then join right now, but it's a safe bet that if you find an actress you like, half or so of her scenes will be wrestling. That's fine if you're into it, but it begins to feel like filler after a while.
Tattoos seem almost tame here, but you'll see lots and lots of tattoos. Matraisse Madeline, a lovely dominatrix who has a great deal of work here, has them on her biceps now, which I personally think detracts from her very, very classic beauty. Oh well. That's fashion these days. Whatever floats your boats.
There are thumbnails that will be under an actress' page that you'll click and realize you can't access without paying more money at another site. Please stop this nonsense, webmasters. When customers who paid to view content at this site need to pay somewhere else to view content that is presented as available, those customers aren't excited and happy to learn that the thumbnail they just clicked will cost more money. If you insist on bothering members with ads behind the paywall, put the ads in a separate section that requires additional clicks. Don't pretend something is available to your paid subscribers when it's not.
There are traditional (not sneaky) ads in the site after you've logged in and are browsing, too.
And now the main reason for the below-average score.
The site is huge. Did I mention that already? Enormous. Years of content. And you won't be allowed to download jack. Sure, you can get a few movies here and there, but the download links time out very, very quickly. You'll get 403 errors on the next links in your queue after downloading something as small as a 250MB video.
I get the feeling they want to make it a streaming site. Eventually it gets to the point where you just give up. It DEFINITELY gets to the point where you aren't going to renew the expensive subscription for another month.
Webmasters, paying customers want to pay you for your product and to encourage you to make more of your product. Yes, I know there are pirates out there who don't want to pay for your stuff, and I'm guessing your approach is an attempt to limit that, but I'd suggest focusing more on people who want to, and will, give you money, because we'll just quit paying after we discover the inconveniences placed only on people who want to give you money. And then we'll forget about ever rejoining your site again.
Worse, we'll tell other paying customers how bad the experience was, and other paying customers will reconsider giving you their money, too.
Bottom line: Lots of content, but unless you're into streaming it's too much of a PITA.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
*****This review is for the kink.com channel of strapon squad ******
- video stills available as .zip files
- kink is adding videos a few times a week - but the videos are all from years ago (see cons)
- Dirty talk is emphasized ("you want this don't you" - that kind of thing.) But often sounds put on and disingenuous.
- 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - however, this looks compressed to me
- multiple qualities available for download so you can save drive space
Cons:
- Sound quality was an issue. I would guess they don't use a boom mic so action goes from bearly audible to wake the wife up LOUD.
- The last update was in 2016.
- Videos are about 20 minutes long. Much shorter and the 45 minutes of action typical of kink shoots.
- as of August 11, 2017, only 15 videos available. (******the full site of Strapon Squad has 100s)
Bottom Line:
It looks like kink.com has licensed some of the content straponsquad.com to add to their network. I liked what was available more than I thought I would although the production value isn't as high as native kink content. I've certainly been spoiled with my membership. The focus of the site is pretty straight forward girl on girl domination often 2 on 1.
I wish there was more available through kink.com The quality looks good and the content has potential. They posted 3 videos that were light hearted - a nice change of pace; but a little boring.
The limited content keeps this from being a buy. With only 15 adds since January, it doesn't make sense to buy kink.com if this is the only site you're interested in. However, if you liked SS and are missing them since they haven't updated in months kink has similar sites that will scratch your itch.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
*****This review is for the kink.com channel of bizarre video******
- video stills available as .zip files
- kink is adding videos a few times a week - but the videos are all from years ago (see cons)
- Variety of fetish content (bondage, insertions, master/slave, wax play, machines, latex, humour - rare find)
- 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps
- multiple qualities available for download so you can save drive space-
- Thye have been adding a new video every day so hopefully, the lack of content problem will get better.
Cons:
- Videos are about 15 minutes long. Much shorter and the 45 minutes of action typical of kink shoots.
- as of July 28, 2017, only about 6 videos available. (******the full site of wasteland.com has 100s)
- videos can be disorienting - some of it looks like it was shot on a shoulder cam.
- It's hard to say many cons when there's such limited availability.
Bottom Line:
It looks like kink.com has licensed some of the content wasteland.com to add to their network. I wish there was more available through kink. The quality looks good and the content has potential. They posted 3 videos that were light hearted - a nice change of pace; but a little boring.
Kink now has over 40 channels (but counting this one with only 6 videos in it is a little inflated.)
The limited content keeps this from being a buy. Wasteland may be worth checking out on its own but if you think you can get enough of their content through a kink subscription - you're wrong.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Intense gangbang content. 4-7 guys in each shoot. Very rare to find a site dedicated to bondage gang bangs.
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Close to 100 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top models. Asa Akira, Bobbi Starr Christy Lynn. SARAH SHEVRON, plus plenty of international models
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Download video stills as a zip file
Cons:
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here
-That quality comes at the cost of large files. This can be a little frustrating because each video contains an approximate 10 minute post interview were the model explains the good time she had
- DEAD SITE hasn't updated since 2013 (this is what kept it score out of the 90s)
Bottom Line:
While kink.com transitioned to a different gang-bang theme (hardcore gang-bang) there was a different flare here so it's not a true translation.
Other than no longer updating this is a great site and I recommend it even though it's small. The shoots with Sarah Shevron alone are worth joining for.
There are plenty of good setup for those of us who like "plots": paying off gambling debt, cheerleader captured by other team, boss with tables turned, etc.
If you're looking for the perfect combination of bondage and hardcore content. This is it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bills using Verotel, Segpay and Epoch. I used Segpay, but have never had any problems using any of these.
-Updates once a week. This is as good as it gets for a rare niche site.
-Good size archive of 114 HD videos.
-The site says most videos are 40 to 50 minutes. Many videos are an hour or more
-Very imaginative as well as creative, one of the best. In 2015 the site won the Rabbits Reviews award for originality. In 2015 it was nominated for an AVN award and in 2016 it was nominated for an XBIZ award.
-There are two channels of audio. The second one is available and you can hear the female model describe the action and her reactions to it.
-Decent mix of ethnicities, body types and ages. However. most are white and in their twenties. Mostly, but not only known porn stars.
-All content is exclusive
-There are no download limits, DRM, broken links or failed downloads. A well run site that gets the job done.
-The members area has zero advertising or offers for upsell.
Cons:
-No discount through PU.
-Far too many tattoos, both on the males and females.
-Main male star has a microscopic penis and always wears a mask.
-In spite of the obvious originality, there are too many videos that fail because they are just too gimmicky, too much circus acts porn, or are simply too long. Too much of a good thing in a long video can also make it seem endless.
-Some videos have been taken down that I saw on the site a few years ago. Why?
-Most updates do not include photos. Of those that do, most are of non zip downloadable tiny sized photo sets of less than a dozen. This can only be described as an embarrassing disaster for an other wise good site.
-The search engine works only so-so though. For example, if you want to find all the videos starring a performer, you may not find them. If you are looking for all the latina videos you will find some, but not a second one with the same star.
Bottom Line:
Soon after this site went online a few years ago, I signed up for a membership. It had only a few videos then and I felt it was just too soon to write a review. I liked what I saw, so I decided to take the plunge now that the site has had time to grow to 114 updates. To my surprise a few of my old videos were no longer online. What they had in common is that they were a bit tamer than the later updates.
If you like Kink videos, this site is a bit similar, but features specifically a lot of anal action. It is somewhat comparable to Everything Butt. If you like one you would probably like the other. If not, beware this is one VERY extreme BDSM site with a focus on degradation. What the models go through is so creative that it has won awards from Rabbits Reviews, AVN, and nominated for an XBIZ award.
The premise is that what you see is a doctor, with help from female nurses and a male assistant, giving therapy to a female who is anally perverted. Giving the patient an overdose of her perversion is supposed to cure her. The action is diabolical, but never verbally overtly mean spirited. If anything it is a bit matter of fact and clinical, which makes it seem as if it were some demented and twisted form of actual therapy.
There is no real story or acting. What they do is try to make each scene natural and undirected by telling them what they are about to do before they start and then letting each scene act itself out. There is no telling the performers do this for five minutes and then ten of that.
Mostly the performers seem into what they are doing, although there is not much visible enjoyment. Often there is pain that leaves marks and bruises, tears and signs of discomfort. The anal mostly is without any warm up or lube. There is a lot of ATM as well as a LOT of female on male analingus. Like other BDSM sites, toys and rope play are used a lot. The way the degradation theme is used is by using a kind of mind play. Some examples are saving the models tears and using them as anal lube, urinating on the women, using their property such as a handbag or their shoes as receptacles for cum or urine and then pouring this down their throats. Sometimes they have them repeat degrading words while the sex is going on, or perform sex acts while on a moving prop. This is a BDSM site as much as it is a sex site.
The action is often extreme and on the border of what is allowable in porn. I would not be surprised in the slightest if one day they get shut down. Given the attitudes of the present administration in the US, I would say if this appeals to you, join now or you may never get another chance.
In spite of its many pluses, I could never give this site a perfect score or even come close.
The video quality is top notch, but many of the models are not. There are a few better looking models such as Anneliese Snow, Desiree Lopez, Sarah Shevon, Penny Pax, and Casey Calvert, but mostly these are overly tatted less than A list rather unattractive women. Many models are goth or punk--strange hair color and metal rings in the nose are fairly common. Unlike the usual male porn stars, the doctor is rather tiny down there and always wears a leather mask. His male assistant has no personality and probably got his tats on sale at the dollar store.
The videos are quite long with many over an hour. Often I found myself fast forwarding as the action is sometimes not worthy of the length of time. I like analingus, but watching it in the same position for twenty minutes or a half hour doesnt work for me. The same is true for ATM done over and over for 20 minutes. Further, some scenes are too weird and circus porn to be hot. Putting a cow head on a model as she is receiving anal? What were they thinking? Too many videos simply dont work for me. In contrast, a decent number are over the top excellent and I think they are what makes the site worth joining. If I had to quantify which videos work, I would say about half to two thirds. That comes to about 60 to 75 top quality creative porn videos out of 114. I readily admit I am fussy and not all the videos on any site work for me, but usually it is a lot more than half.
If PU could work out a discount it would be even better. Right now a membership through PU is inexplicably five dollars more expensive than joining through Rabbits Reviews.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Premier kink content. Scenes are very heavy on BDSM - lots of spanking. There's a good mix of partner action and multiple partners. Most scenes have a interesting set up everything from revenge to naughty maids.
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Updates once/week
- Close to 700 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top fetish models. If she's a big name she's probably worked here. There's also more diversity of ethnicity/body type/pregnant etc. than any other network I can think of.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
Cons:
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- Shoot have some stills that you can preview before loaded the video - but no downloads.
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- photo zips have been added back - but when I was last a member they didn't reapply that for the whole back catalog
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here
-That quality comes at the cost of large files. This can be a little frustrating because each video contains an approximate 10 minute post interview were the model explains the good time she had
Bottom Line:
***April 22, 2017***** After reviewing some wise comments from the community I decide to back away from the 100 point score I previously entered. I hate the notion that "you can't score a 100", but they are correct this is not the site to exemplify that notion. THANK YOU for taking the time to critique me.
I know some people will challenge my rating of 100. Please read this before killing me in the comments. I rate a site based on what it reports to be. And S & S does exactly what it says. They deliver hardcore kinky BDSM content with flawless production values. You can see and hear all the action. The camera doesn't jerk around wildly and there are interesting "plots". I could knock them down to a 98 or 99 because "no one is perfect" but to me it's not about an arbitrary measure of perfect; it's how close did you come to delivering what you promised. Sex and Submission hits the mark.
Kink is a huge player and I view Sex and Submission as their flag ship site. It is one of the more frequently updates; gets the bigger talent, and has the broadest appeal. That said: Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here.
Although it is pricy I think everyone should check out kink.com; and S&S in particular. They allow 5 previews a day and the previews give a good taste of what's inside. Along with Brazzers, Reality Kings,and Naughty AmericaI I view kink.com as something you owe it to yourself to at least get a months membership once.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Great lighting and sound even when there's multiple partners (a problem many other sites have)
- Humiliation included: "slut" "cock breath" that sort of thing
- Almost ever shoot has anal
- More model diversity (ethnicity) than you find in most places.
- Great talent. If you have a fetish model you like that shoot from 2010 to 2015 she's likely here. Lexi Belle was the 1st model.
- Over 225 shoots.
- In a site like this it matters who the male talent is and they are also exceptional Kirk Lockwood, Otto Bauer, Maestro, really bring out the passion in the female talent.
- Allows download managers.
Cons:
- No longer updating. Last update was March 2015
- Disproportion number of tattooed models (does't bother me, but I know it's a turn off for some. )
- Organization could be better the tagging system is weak there are missing tags and search is limited.
- Pricy. If you're only looking for this site and not the power of the network then don't spend you money for just this site.
- No way to favorite things you'd like to come back to
- Stark settings mostly a dull room with ropes for suspensions. (I know I know it's a dungeon)
Bottom Line:
Great mix of bondage and rough sex. I found a lot to like here. I wish the site was still updating.
While not worth the price to join in and of itself as part of a wider network it, I consider it a buy. I keep my membership for a few months.
Some advice for those that follow after me: let the comments that accompany each shoot be your guide. I wasted a lot of bandwidth seeing what I like and what I didn't.
Plenty of great talent I really liked Roxanne Rae, India Summer, Bella Rossi, and Penny Pax (love Penny's kink content).
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
