Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-many cute models
-some decent photosets
-some HD videos added
Cons:
-recycled updates
-limited supply of videos
-many models featured on other sites owned by the same company
-quality of videos varies greatly
Bottom Line:
Mike18 is probably the best known of the Russian twink sites. The model is quite adorable and sexy. He smiles a lot and seems to enjoy his work unlike the other gay for pay boys he works with.
Mike has also been around for quite a long time. The site is not really new as it would be called Mike40 by now. It also has the same models so many other sites have from the same company.
Of all the sites in this group, Mike18 is the best and usually has the most content. The problem is they take off much of it so it can be recycled back as an update. When one joins, they don't know what to get.
The site also is one of those notorious ones which has no place to check what models and videos are offered. That makes it even more of a guess work and should be a red flag to those who wish to join.
The price itself varies but has stayed at $25 a month for now.
Some of these sites offer bonus videos but they are usually of low quality both visually and model wise.
If one needs to have Mike in the porn collection, this site is worth it for a month. If one already does, then this site has nothing new to offer.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Excellent production values
+A lot of content available in high definition
+Fully downloadable content, not DRM
+Download in flash, wmv and mpeg4
+133 videos, which includes 770+ scenes_
+Pics downloadable as zip file.
Cons:
-No system for browsing through pictures, have to open each one separately.
-Content can become repetitive
-Model search facility could be better
-All pics are only screencaps, no original model pictures
-$34.95 expensive for one month fee, although incentives if stay a second month, or are member of more than one Kink.com site.
Bottom Line:
This is another offering from the ever professional and high quality Kink.com network of sites.
This is more than just a nude all male wrestling site. The guys are generally quite hot, and the matches seem to be taken extremely seriously, with three rounds, plus a sex round, where the winner gets to do what he wants with his loser. These guys are serious about the contest and are skilled wrestlers. Obviously, this being a kink.com site, the rules are slightly different, additional points being won for ass-fingering, cock stroking etc.
The site includes a forum which is regularly added to, and there are live shows every month or so, where fights take place in front of an audience and members can chat whilst the match is taking place.
Updates are every week-10 days, and the videos are lengthy, at about an hour each. All videos are available at 960x540, and are in three resolutions low, medium and high quality. The videos are also broken down into smaller scenes.
The strengths of this site are definitely the concept and the videos, it's the pictures that let it down.
Although the site boasts 33,360+ pictures, they are all screencaps from the videos. It could really use some different photos of the models. Although the pics can be downloaded as zip files, when viewing them on the site, there is no slideshow facility so you have to open each picture separately.
There is a model search function, which gives you the models basic stats, and a link to all their videos on the Kink.com network. The problem is that when you click on a video you are directed to the videos on the Kink ppv site, so, even if you are a member of the sites (and I'm a member of 2 Kink sites) you cannot open the videos unless paying, so you have to remember the video, go back to the original site, and try and find it... This is disappointing from a company that really does produce excellent material and is so professional in every other way.
At $34.95, the site is expensive. The fees go down if you subscribe for two months or more, and if you are a member of one site, you can get another membership for $19.99 I believe.
This is a high quality site, well thought out with a great concept and excellent production values. There are a few problems with the pictures and search facility, and the content can become repetitive. But I'd definitely recommend it for a month or so, to download the material.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Big collection, useful website for full members. I have over 30 DVDs already downloaded from this website. They really add something new every day and I was amazed by collection.
Cons:
None.
Bottom Line:
Highly recommended website. I never cancel my membership if "ready for iPod" option will be added.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Updates twice a week, all updates are exclusive
- Latest updates are available up to Full-HD (1080p)
- Site got finally rid of WMV and DRM, all scenes are DRM-free MP4 now
- There's a video for almost any fetish you can imagine
- Model and production quality is very high
Cons:
- Downloads can be very slow sometimes
- Updates from Bonus sites appear on the members start page and videos page, you have to specify, you only want to see Boynapped updates every time
- Charges 24,95 Euros, even if it says it's 24,95 USD/month, that's a 30% plus
- Pre-checked cross-sales (auto-renewing trial memberships)
Bottom Line:
I was very glad to see, the site got rid of WMV and especially DRM, so I gave it another try, even though I was very unsatisfied last time I joined thanks to technical difficulties. Their content was always very unique and I don't know of a similar site delivering you british kinky twink porn at professional production quality. I didn't get disappointed, the site is completely remade and all videos are re-encoded to DRM-free MP4 available as streaming video and download. Most latest updates are available as 1080p HD video and they look stunning, you defenitely need a decent internet connection, though, because some videos can be over 3 GB big. Sadly, I never got to full download speed and sometimes even had terrible speed, but if you want to see your video instant, you can always stream it. The variety of scenes is very wide, there is a scene for nearly any fetish you can imagine, you can search for your favourite fetish by using tags, you can even search for multiple at once. Right now (01/2013) there are about 330 scenes and about 150 models (including bonus sites, you can't dismiss those on the models page) available for your pleasure. Model and production quality are very high and the models play their role really good, I haven't seen bad acting or bored models so far. Before joining watch out, what they charge you in your local currency und un-check those pre-checked cross-sales for trial memberships, but all-in-all if you are into kinky british twinks, I can highly recommend joining.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- very young and natural looking guys
- you get to know the guys in personal interview clips
- good forum, where the makers of the site as well as the boys discuss with users
- huge amount of content
- guys look like they're really enjoing themselves
- good preview, where you can see all content you can expect
Cons:
- only real time player options
- they try to convince you to use firefox instead of internet explorer, but I had no problems in accessing the site with IE
- some guys are shown over and over again
Bottom Line:
All in all the site is excellent. A lot of young and attractive boys, who really seem to enjoy themselves. The best thing is that it has a personal touch not found in many porn sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Possibly the biggest solo male site.
Most of the guys are masculine enough to appeal to straight women.
Over 500 solo videos on this site, the number could be higher, but I’m not watching every scene to see if another man slips in later in the scene.
Newer videos have up to 1080p – but no 4K.
Easy site to use and download from. Works with free download manager.
Photos that can be downloaded, but I don’t look at the photos.
Cons:
Some of the guys just are not going to appeal to straight females. I’m only mentioning that because the title of the site, “Next Door Male” has nothing in it to show that it’s a gay model site.
The last update was 6/11/2019
Video quality matches the site’s inconsistency. This site has scenes covering a 15 year period. It doesn’t look like anything has been remastered.
Bottom Line:
This is the best site on the Next Door Studios network – if you are a straight woman. The whole theme is solo men. I’m going to say the majority of these men could be believable straight men. There is a whole “tough guy” or maybe it’s a military vibe with the guys. I’m not American so I’m basing that on stereotypes. There are a lot of tattooed guys. Short hair, muscular physiques, not a lot of really big dicks, so I guess they are really going for the “guy next door” look with their models.
The scenes show one of the weaknesses of solo men porn. They aren’t trying to tease the viewer, they aren’t talking much, they are just trying to cum as fast as possible.
I do like that the scenes are filmed in different houses/rooms, and it makes it look like these guys just showed up at home and decided to record themselves masturbating. One solo men site I was on had the men all using the same room and couch to masturbate on. It was like being a fly on the wall of a sperm clinic.
I listed over 500 solo scenes in the pros. The number is closer to 600, but as mentioned, I am not watching them all from start to finish to make sure there’s not another guy in some of the scenes.
The one part that is a concern is the video quality. This took awhile and might not be exact, but in 2012 they added 1080p. That is only about 1/3 the total videos. The other 2/3 were before 2012. Those either top out at 720p or 480p.
I think with this niche and seeing that it’s no longer updating, you have to take what you can get and not complain too much. I don’t think they can add much personality to the scenes since the created “masculinity” might not hold up as well. Besides tattoos, beards, there are UFC posters on the walls in some scenes and most of the guys are “hairy”. I have learned enough about gay porn trying to find solo men scenes that I know this more masculine look is a niche in gay porn.
The scenes give very little to talk about other than a man sits down or stands in front of a mirror and starts masturbating. It’s a very good site and network if that sounds like something you would like.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
* Unique content
* High production values
* No DRM
* Choice of WMV or MP4 files
* Hot models with guy-next-door paticipants
* Updated with one big scene reliably once a week
* Excellent smooth flash player with large screen, loads real fast and lets you jump around instantly.
* High quality, high-res videos are crystal clear and smooth, and brilliant camerawork - very professional.
* Superb customer service
* Lots of feedback on videos
* Decent $29.95 per month often discounted by $10
Cons:
- Main odels are hot but need more variety - mainly white, American, clean-cut with good bodies.
- Same models in several scenes
- Not a massive archive of footage yet
- Sometimes I miss the more raw amateur feel
- Many "straight" models don't even come near to being convincing, some poor acting.
- Live cams cost extra
- No access to other network sites
- Some imagination in scenarios but can get a little samey.
Bottom Line:
Basic idea - one hot guy is "forced" to be naked in front of groups of guys, tied up, humiliated and made to serve.
I love the way the site sticks to the basic idea of all the guys focusing on the one guy relentlessly instead of pairing off with each other. Also good - the main model is usually classically hot, but some more ordinary guys get to use them too! They show some imagination in the scenarios and there's a good amount of outdoor action in some pretty public places!
They have a few recurring themes - one is the "gay mafia" where a queeny model is harassed by a "straight" guy who is then stripped and humiliated by a bunch of toughs from the gay mafia. Sounds my ultimate fantasy but sadly the "straight" guy is sometimes swishier/camper than the gay guy he's supposedly abusing, and the fantasy is totally cut out when you see the before and after videos in which the "straight" guy couldn't make it clearer he's really gay!
Many have commented that the interviews ruin the fantasy. I think they are there for legal reasons, but other sites have done it and made it hot - the models agree they did it of their own free will, but keep up the act - reluctant and ashamed, admitting they only did it for money. Not here - the guys grin all over their happy gay little faces! They should have the interviews as seperate scenes so you could have choice, but they're still covered legally.
The standard price is $29.95, which is reasonable, but sign up for their mailing list and it's often "on sale" at $19.95 for a month.
The video quality is awesome - beautifully shot & crystal clear. The downloads offer a choice of MP4 or WVM in 1280x720 resolution (lower res is also available) and the in-browser flash works flawlessly. Great customer service, feedback is encouraged - a class act.
For all this technical brilliance, I didn't renew. They've got the production values, hot models and slick camerawork - but they've forgotten that kink is supposed to be sleazy and naughty - no matter how hardcore the action, it somehow feels unreal, a little sanitized. I enjoyed it and would join again now and then, but somehow they need they keep the quality but regain a little sleaziness!
Combine the technical brilliance and service of this American site with the raw sleaze of a British one, you'd get perfection! This site gets right what the British ones don't, but sadly the reverse is also true.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Site offers 194 scenes (updates once a week)
- 166 models with very unique authentic looks and styles
- Recent scenes are available as 1280x720p MP4
- All scenes offered as stream and download at very fast speeds
- Detailed model (including video interviews) and scene information available
- Production quality is very high, lightning, cutting and camera work seem very professional
- Offers a 3-day-trial-membership without limitations
- Site navigation is very easy, you can browse by model, tag, rating, views, date etc.
- Allows multiple downloads and (with limitations - see cons) download managers
Cons:
- You have to login twice and answer a CAPTCHA
- No actual search-field
- You can use download-managers, but can't browse the site during your download, as only one program can be logged in
- Interviews are streaming only, there's no option to download these
- There are a few scenes that only exist to advertise products (Spunk Lube, Fleshjack, ...)
- Some scenes didn't work as the files were corrupt, support was non-existant
Bottom Line:
Alternadudes is definitely a unique site featuring several kinds of alternative styled models like surfers, rockers, emos, punks, goths, skaters, guys with tattoos and piercings. Their styling doesn't seem fake, most models are very authentic. Model age is ranged from 18 to early 30s and some scenes offer a quite unusual model mix. The amount of solos is - especially for older scenes - quite high with alot more duo scenes appearing recently.
The site runs actually on a WordPress blog as CMS, a thing I've never seen before, but it actually works out pretty well, the only thing I'm missing is an actual search-field. You can search by model, tag or date and you can sort both - models and scenes - by number of views, ratings, date and name. You can leave comments on model and scene pages and you can rate them or add them to your favorites for later browsing. Model pages give alot of information and I actually think those information is honest, a thing I rarely see, because dicks are smaller and models might be older than what other sites tell you they are. There are model interviews for nearly every model on the site.
All videos are available as stream or download in different sizes up to 1280x720p HD MP4. Every scene is available as medium-quality WMV. Streaming and downloading is very fast, you can download multiple scenes at once and download links do not expire. You are limited to streaming one scene at once, though. Download managers are supported, but you can't browse the site during your download, because you can only have one session logged in, so you are logged out of the site in your browser while you use your download manager. Model interviews are streaming-only, you can't download them.
Production quality seems to be very professional, lightning and camera work are very good, some scenes get sent-in by amateur models shot at their home, quality depends on the model's setup. There could be a bit more story line, most scenes start right away, it's sad, because there's a wide range of sets they use to shoot videos and it would be very easy to create a story out of those.
Extras are a monthly desktop wallpaper calendar and behind-the-scenes action. I didn't like the wallpapers, but the behind-the-scenes were fun and interesting to watch.
Photos are often vid caps, you can tell the site's focus is videos. They are available for download as ZIP or as slideshow.
Overall the site is very unique and offers you exclusive content, you'll see nowhere else. Videos are very enjoyable, but 4 updates a month is not enough to pay $29,95 / month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Over 220 videos
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Great production value. Lighting/sound/talent is all top notch.
- While every shoot is always in the theme of a man denied his orgasm - there is always a new twist. Including holiday themed debauchery.
- Exclusive content.
- Robust community. Pretty much every shoot has a lengthy set of comments. You can really get a good sense of the content from the comment sheet.
Cons:
- Defunct site. Last update was January 2013.
- Organization is horrible. You can filter by amount of circumcised or uncircumcised hair - but can't filter searches.
- Shoots have some stills that you can preview before loaded the video - but no downloads.
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Little model diversity. Most are straight out of central casting.
- TBP review says that there is straight/bi/gay content. I only saw gay content - not sure why the difference.
- International models. I prefer everything in English.
Bottom Line:
Gay porn is not my thing. But I figured sense I have the membership, and no one has yet posted a review, I'd give my impressions. Hopefully this is a dispassion and fair assessment. I didn't score it down because it's not my interest, after all it's not the sites fault that I don't like it's product.
If they guys are acting here they're doing a damn good job. It seemed to me to be very genuine pleasured distress as they got close to cumming and then were knocked back down.
If this is an interest of yours I'm sure you'll be very happy with Men on Edge.
Don't despair that Kink.com (the network site) has stopped updating this site. They still have 24 sites going 7 of which in their gay category.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Massive gay porn site that excels at solo scenes.
Daily updates
Nearly 6,000 scenes and even more picture sets
Downloads are unlimited, and everything can be downloaded.
Fun and playful scenes which I think is different for gay porn.
Video downloads are 4K, HD and smaller mobile sizes
Cons:
Gay porn is becoming “gayer” and less friendly to us straight women.
Mostly young guy models
Bottom Line:
I slowed on my joining of gay male sites. It is the closest straight women have to pornography focused on the male anatomy, but as time goes on, the gayness of the genre has started taking away the ability to fantasize the guys are performing for me.
My cons are not cons for some people and I think even their major audience (gay men) would find as pros. The male models are generally young, fit and clean-shaven. I think there is a large group of gay men who love that niche and if you are one, this site does the twink, metrosexual look very well. The other con is how much gay porn is turning gayer. Little touches that I’m sure gay men love seeing are reminding me I’m a straight woman and not a gay man. Use of dildos is an example.
The review is intended to also promote the site to the gay man audience. There are high quality and unlimited downloads of videos and picture sets. The videos can be downloaded as high as 4K and offer small mobile resolutions as well.
There’s no real story to the scenes. It’s either solo and supposed to be like you’re a voyeur watching the guy masturbate or men having sex with each other. The solo scenes are good enough for me, but do wish they would reconsider the use of sex toys during masturbation. If a woman uses a strap-on dildo on a man, I like it. If a man is having anal sex with another man, I can at least fantasize I’m sneaking a peek of them having sex. If a man is sitting by himself and while rubbing his penis, turns on his side and shoves a 9 inch dildo up his butt, I really can’t fantasize I’m involved or interested in that at all.
The site does have daily updates and I believe does the gay porn genre as good as any site. The navigation is also great and it at least lets me separate the solo scenes from the hardcore ones.
There is a playful and fun side to some of the scenes and it’s worth mentioning. I have said many times before that gay porn is far behind straight porn. That is because gay porn, regularly, uses nothing to make it distinctive or original. Some of the scenes on Boy Fun use roles and titles to add some fun and even my first ever exposure to gay false incest porn. That does add a whole new dimension to gay porn since it’s stepbrothers and uncle by marriage as examples. Those scenes at least make sense to the viewer and likewise, it helps turn the genre into aimed solely at gay men. I would rate this site even higher if I didn’t feel out of place watching it, but I felt like this type of gay porn is off-limits for us women.
-only a few dozen videos on this site
-quality of videos vary
-few photosets available
Bottom Line:
When I was a member of Crush Him a few months ago I only had access to this site. The company has since added several other sites with much more content so I have upped the score.
The models are cute for the most part with many being exclusive. Others come from sister sites from the owner.
The good news is there is a lot more content now which makes it worth the cost. I wish some of those Euro sites would do the same thing and merge a few sites so we could save money.
As for the videos themselves, they are amateur and the quality shows. Some are out of focus but others are rather well done.
There are some cuties as well as average Joes in this site. I do like overall feel the site is going for. It does need improvements as it does recycle some older stuff as new. Still, there is original content that manages to be made and released.
The main thing is the site is improving and that is what I like to see. I will join again and update this review.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A network of gay sites and it’s worth a look for straight women and gay men too
Includes access to 5 sites and advertised as over 30 channels
Over 2,000 scenes and picture sets on the whole network.
Everything is downloadable and the downloads are unlimited.
Video download quality goes up to 1080p
It's the most entertaining gay porn I have seen
Cons:
The combination of 30 channel claims and faulty navigation make using the network, more difficult than it should be
If you’re tired of straight false incest porn; here’s you a whole network of gay false incest porn
Bottom Line:
I joined this network back months ago, but didn’t ever review it. I rejoined a few weeks ago and am happy to review it with the proclamation of it’s the most entertaining gay porn I have seen. The network includes access to Say Uncle, Brother Crush, Family Dick, Latin Leche, Perverted Perps and the site, not a joke, Missionary Boys. The sites do a good and at least maybe believable job of living up to these themes. The brother crush site is stepbrothers having sex and playing with each other. Say Uncle is older men dominating younger men. Family Dick is just all-around false incest. Latin Leche is of Latin men spilling their boy milk for each other. Perverted Perps is a lot like any of the false cop arrests someone and makes them have sex to free them. Missionary Boys is young men in Missionary outfits and doing things with each other and with the older men too.
Definitely a step in the right direction of perversion. I never realized how politically correct gay porn is until I started seeing themes like Missionary Boys. That’s definitely pushing the genre ahead or behind – depending on your view.
I have not seen many gay sites that even use themes or outfits in their scenes. I may get booed or pelted by tomatoes for saying false gay incest does not seem as ludicrous as false straight incest. I’m sure there are stepbrothers who see their stepbrother nude for the first time and realize they like it. I’m sure there are older men who try and take advantage of their younger nephews or stepsons and yes, I’m sure there are cops and authority figures who abuse their power to get the sex they are ashamed to tell their wife about. Most of all, Missionary Boys, may just be the most believable gay porn site ever created. I say that with no ill-intentions and as a Catholic.
The network has almost 2,000 scenes and 2,000 accompanying picture sets. There are no limits on downloads and downloads come with the basic subscription. One thing to make note of is the price. It shows as $50 per month, but when I signed up, there was a $14.95 promo for the whole network and downloads included.
I do think the dark humor twist is needed in gay porn. I’ve heard many gay jokes told by gay men about sitting on grandpa’s lap and uncle helping with a shower. But it does seem the gay porn world is highly politically correct and not touching the taboo themes.
This network is very good porn for a gay man and some of it still has appeal for straight women. It’s at least partially entertaining and giggle-worthy at times and it’s updating with a huge back catalog. Great network that I believe is the best of the gay networks.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Exclusive content
-Good video production
Cons:
-Navigation is not the easiest
-There are many other sites lumped together which cost additional
-Expensive ($29.95) site for a few videos (44)
-Must get a very expensive premium membership for more access to other sites
Bottom Line:
I found this site on Rabbit Reviews and joined as it was discounted for a day. I must admit they have an interesting site but it is set up quite differently. I think I'll stick with Porn Users for now.
Brother Crush is exactly what it claims to be but with step brothers. It involves videos of younger men getting caught by older men which leads to the typical sex scene. The video production is quite good for the most part and the models are exclusive.
Most scenes feature models in their thirties and above which is good if you like mature men. They are all in shape and most are quite good looking.
It can be a task trying to download the scenes once you log onto the site. They don't do a good job of separating content from other sites not paid for. This makes the entire site feel like a rip off at times as the content is limited for what you get.
The only way around this is to purchase a yearly membership to the host site for $365. That seems a bit high for most of us porn fans.
As for Brother Crush, there are only 44 videos to stream and download. If not for the discount I wouldn't have joined as it costs $29.95 a month.
I do think this is how most mega sites are run these days. The problem is you see a hot model and want to watch his other videos only to find out they are on another site you must now join.
Maybe some of the older sites have spoiled me with their many thousands of older videos I have access to when I join them. They all had to start off with such few videos as well at one time.
I doubt I will join this site again as it just doesn't have the content I like. There were several videos featured with a few really hot models so I joined. But once I saw the rest, I wasn't too impressed. Maybe others will like them as they feature more mature models.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Exclusive content
-features daddies and twinkies and bears, oh my!
-unlimited downloads
Cons:
-Not the easiest site to navigate like Brother Crush
-Expensive site on its own for what is offered
Bottom Line:
There was a question on the poll page about joining a site because of one model. I joined this site because of two identical twin boys who do a shower scene together. They don't have contact with each other as this is just a fantasy site. But they are quite hot and I joined it because of them. It didn't hurt this site was also on sale at the time.
As for the other content, I'm not really into daddy porn. There are fans of this type of site and they should be pleased with it. There are over 100 videos for them to enjoy. Again, people can be full members of the premium site by paying large amount of money for a yearly membership.
As far as quality goes the videos are of good quality. They don't have 4K which is for those who really care about that sort of thing.
There isn't much to say about this site other than it delivers what it offers. Obviously the models aren't related as this is just fantasy. It just isn't something I ever fantasized about. In fact some of the scenarios are downright creepy but that's just me.
This is a site that has a niche following. The videos are well made and most are well lit. For those wanting this stuff I recommend it. There are over 100 videos on this site so it might be worth a full membership price.
As for me, I joined and saw but didn't really like. I gave the site a lower score because of how it is put together. As far as content is concerned, I would rate it a bit higher if I was interested in such videos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large network of gay sites
16 sites included with the network.
Newer videos have 4K downloads.
Unlimited downloads including photo set zips.
Over 8,000 videos and photo sets.
Still updating weekly
Cons:
Several sites are no longer updating
If you’re a gay male you’ll probably love the content, but being a straight woman who likes to watch gay porn, there are not enough solo scenes.
Bottom Line:
Next Door Studios is probably one of the best buys in the gay porn genre. You get 16+ sites, hot guys, up to 4K downloadable videos that are unlimited and downloadable photo zips. There are over 8,000 combined videos and photo sets. The navigation could be better or better yet, they could have more variety in the scenes so that better navigation is required.
It is my one complaint as a straight woman. There are not enough solo scenes. Figuring out how many is enough is difficult, but I do know there are not enough solo videos. Do the genders in porn work that way? Solo female porn is very common, but it’s just not that common in male porn.
I do believe and have talked about this before in reviews of gay sites, me being negative about lack of solo videos is probably a positive for gay males wanting to join the site.
The basis of this network is based around individual models, but they seemed to change that direction at some point. About half of the included sites are of individual gay male stars. The other sites play off the “next door” name like Next Door Male and Next Door Buddies.
It is difficult for me to judge the quality of performance since I’ve never been a part of gay male sex. It does seem like the majority of the scenes attempt to showcase the models’ looks and bodies as much if not more than the actual action. That makes it seem like solo scenes would be very popular.
The scenes are short on the stories, but if you know of gay porn with stories, you’ve been on sites I’m not familiar with. Most of these scenes are based on guy sees a guy he likes and they have sex. There’s no rhyme or reason or set reason/fetish for one wanting the other except for sex. I am guessing that is how gay porn fans prefer their porn, but I would like to see more stories and even explanations, maybe even some type of betrayal of a “straight” man being with a gay man and his girlfriend/wife catching them. Did I just do more with gay porn stories than the entire industry has done in 20 years? I think so. As much as we expect porn to evolve and keep up with the times, it’s kind of ironic to me that gay porn (males and lesbian) do not try going outside their genre. It seems like a gay sex scene turning into a bisexual scene or even more in group sex would be popular.
Either way, for standard gay porn Next Door Studios is one of the better values in terms of quality, quantity and value for your dollar.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The Adult Time of gay porn is what I was told about this network. I think it’s owned by the same company that owns Adult Time.
It comes with 17 sites and they are currently offering a free month access to their new site NextDoorTaboo. I didn’t add it as I’m most interested in the solo scenes.
Some of the sites in the network are updating with 4K scenes, most have all the download options Adult Time has with 360p up to 1080p and all the resolutions between those.
Currently advertises 3,599 exclusive videos on the network and 1,513 models.
Has downloadable photo sets, they list them as total photos not total photo sets and have 215,509 photos currently.
Averages a new scene per day.
Cons:
I would have been happier if it were 17 sites of solo men!
The oldest scenes which include a lot of the solo scenes are from 2005 and only have 480p download option
Better use of the tags. I also see this in straight porn too. Why list “masturbation” on a scene that eventually turns into sex?
Bottom Line:
I joined this network based on a recommendation from another Porn User member. Overall, I am pleased with it. I recognized some of these guys from other gay sites I have joined. I am hoping gay sites will think about the other market they appeal to and that’s straight women who like to watch men masturbating.
They have 17 sites on the network and I’m going to review a few of those separately since they have more focus on solo men. Compared to the other gay sites or networks I have tried, this one really stands out and above the others. There are seven of the “Next Door” themed sites and seven “solo male” sites including one I am very familiar with – Cody Cummings. It also has one more site called “Stroke that Dick”.
This number surprises me since if it’s true this is by far the most solo men videos I have seen on one site. Using their search and filters it says there are 1,720 solo scenes. This is where I took some points off.
Using just their tags it shows 1,093 solo scenes. That’s still a lot more than I have seen anywhere, but it’s still an inconsistency I would rather not see happening. Even on the 1,093 solo scene results there it a second filter to filter within the results and there’s “Anal Sex (16)” listed. It just doesn’t seem like this should be that hard to say, “There’s one guy in this scene and he masturbates.”
One review I read of this network said the downloads cost extra, but they haven’t been extra for me. Even the 4K downloads come with the membership.
I did find their ads to be annoying too. When you sign in you get one of those upsell pages like a lot of straight porn sites have where it shows 9 or more sites you can add to your membership. In the member’s area, there are ads along the bottom of the screen too, but they’re not too annoying.
This is as close to a gay network that can appeal to straight women as I have found and it’s why I’m giving it the score of 94. See my individual reviews of some of the sites on the network to see which ones have the most solo or best solo scenes.
Other gay sites are included, but are not listed including Yes Sir Boys, Bound and Gagged, Boynapped and My Dirtiest Fantasy.
High Kink production values.
Cons:
Four of the listed sites are no longer updating.
Scenes can be very repetitive.
Very little masturbation
Bottom Line:
I have a fetish for watching men masturbate. It's not one that is easily fulfilled. There is some masturbation here, but most of what they have here is similar to the straight Kink content.
Thirty Minutes of Torment is a man being bound, touched, whipped, spanked and put through 30 minutes of torment by another man. These scenes are okay. There's only so much believable safe pain before it starts to become uncomfortable to watch and this site, for me at least, pushes that limit.
Bound Gods is probably the best of the sites and it's a very large site that is still updating. While it's not much different from Thirty Minutes of Torment, there is less of a violent edge to it. It has nearly 600 scenes in its back catalog and there are varying themes which is also different than Thirty Minutes of Torment. You see the production values more on this site.
Bound in Public is a lot like their straight site Public Disgrace. You have a group of men dominating one man and while it says public, a lot of the scenes are not in public. It would appeal to those into male exhibitionism which I think is very rare. It's not a small site either at over 240 scenes, but it is no longer updating.
Butt Machine Boys is the closest the network comes to male masturbation and is the gay version of Fucking Machines. Men use the powered and motorized dildos on themselves while masturbating. I do like this content quite a bit as there is a common theme with all of these sites have muscular men on them. It only has around 150 scenes and isn't updating, but for those into male masturbation they might want to download all of the scenes.
Men on Edge is the most unique site of these. The scenes while not much different than the other sites on this network, bring in some story and there's more of a feeling of dominance which isn't easy to do with two males. This is another bigger site at over 300 scenes and it is still updating.
My feeling with this content is they tried to go for male/gay versions of their straight sites and the men just aren't flexible enough to perform the scenes the way the female performers do. Some of the content is very sexy, while some of it just makes me look away. There doesn't seem to be much of a middle ground.
They also have the gay site Naked Kombat that is their gay version of Ultimate Surrender. It has the same positives and negatives as the female version. Some of it looks planned/staged as the action seems to change at the same time in each scene. There are cringe-worthy moments like a guy having his dick in another man's butt and the guy falling back on his dick.
There are multiple other gay channels including the ones I listed in the pros. They have 7 other ones and a bisexual male site with male/male/female scenes. These look like licensed content from larger standalone sites.
The videos follow a Kink standard of the largest available resolution being 1280x720, their streaming player works well which is important for me on a network like this. It let's me scan through the scene to see if there's going to be parts I would be interested in.
With Kink's production values I think they could do better with the gay genre. I would like to see them take the bisexual niche and do something like a male masturbating with a female in a cell watching him and a male in another cell watching him. Whichever one orgasms first gets to have sex with him. I think that shows why I don't score this site higher. It just feels like they took the straight content and made it into gay content without really putting any thought into the scenes.
It's not bad and is one of the better gay sites I have been a member of. I would think it appeals to gay men more than straight women and it's good if that's your interest.
The score would be lower if not for the very attractive, athletic men they feature.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gay site that involves bondage, domination and some impressive bodies.
Updates once per week, the site has 375 scenes on it.
Most gay sites are going to interest me with solo scenes, this one has 0, but this does seem to be a different take on gay porn than I’m used to.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and mobile versions of the downloads.
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are as many aggressive gay porn fans as straight ones.
Cons:
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are some gay porn fans completely disgusted by the idea of a woman watching gay porn.
The titles of the scenes read like poor Erotica quotes, “Cum Breed Me”? Really?
Tries way too hard to establish dominance and submissiveness without using real human nature. There’s a therapist inside me.
Bottom Line:
More so than any other site on this network, this one is filled with combative comments from the members, and it reached the level, for me, of making it unappealing. This reminds me a lot of the Kink Men sites. These scenes are the most creative I have seen in gay porn and there is the establishing a role which you rarely see in porn. The first problem for me was there are no solo scenes. Reading the comments kind of made that clearer to me. There were a lot of comments about wanting to see real gay chemistry in the scenes. That’s not going to happen in solo gay porn. If gay porn fans are having problems enjoying scenes with multiple men having sex, they probably don’t enjoy solo men either. That’s why it hard to find solo gay men porn. I guess I need to branch out to transsexuals.
The scenes on this site almost all revolve around establishing a role. There is bondage, there is even physical dominance and you get the ones with the guys who like being the submissive and I can only think to say, those scenes are cute. It’s cute watching a man be submissive and seductive. I did notice the one solo model I liked a lot was receiving a lot of hate. Maybe I’m sensing that he’s not really gay and the gay fans don’t like him. This site does show some of the technological advances of the network. Most of the sites I have reviewed on it are not updating. This one is and it is once per week and they have up to 4K on the newer scenes. It just looks like gay solo porn has died.
These scenes have some appeal to me. Some of the guys are very attractive and I think the roughness and aggressiveness of the scenes are shooting those testosterone levels up and you’re getting to some very impressive erections. I don’t have as much interest in how the scenes play out or end. This is not good porn for a straight woman. The scenes I watched showed more of a love/fascination with each other than I am used to seeing in gay porn. I’m not for sure if that’s what gay men want either. I know that I like softer hardcore in male/female porn, but I don’t have interest in seeing the male and female seem fascinated with each other and in love. I will recommend this site to gay men. I won’t to straight women. I will also it has made me think twice about gay porn unless I know there are solo scenes. There are only so much nice bodies can cover. Some of these guys are more obnoxious than the straight guys that we normally associate with being obnoxious. Not my cup of tea.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Network of 5 gay sites that has some appeal for women.
Currently has 696 scenes and averages 2 updates per week.
Videos and photos are downloadable with no limits.
Navigation is handled through tags.
Group scenes which I think are better than the one on one, but not better than the solo.
Includes access to a large streaming network.
Cons:
Still not enough solo scenes, not in relative comparison to the total number of scenes.
Sites seem to change focus. Gay Public Hardcore has most of the solo scenes on it, but the scenes leading up to the solo scenes are two guys in public. The solo scenes are not that public.
No model list, I have noticed most guys that are in solo scenes have other solo scenes on gay sites. There are also no model names on the scenes.
Bottom Line:
I saw several solo videos from this network while streaming videos. I probably should have checked further into how many solo scenes they have as the number is under 30, but they are good. The guys for the most part are handsome and fit except for the strange masked man who appears in numerous scenes. I do think the masked man kind of fits the whole feel here since there is no model list and there are no model names on any of the scenes. The one guy you know is the masked man.
This is maybe the 5th or 6th site I have joined that are considered “gay” sites, but it the first I have seen with orgies. The site Gay Bang Boy has scenes with as many as 10 or more men in each scene. This has its pluses, since I like to see men masturbating, the ones not directly involved in the sex are usually standing around masturbating. Some are guys just masturbating together. The only problem with these scenes is there are masked men. The masked man referred to earlier wears a black mask that covers his face. The masked men in these orgy scenes are more like Halloween masks. It is just a little strange.
They have 696 scenes with 2 updates per week. The videos can be downloaded in 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are more like screen captures and can be downloaded too.
Besides the orgies surprising me, a lot of these orgies have men that look 18-21 and some that look over 50. It kind of reminds me of Party Hardcore except they’re in a house with no women. The camera does get lost at times and tries to show too many of the men at one time. It is still is new to me see all-male orgies.
The other sites, Bareback Boy Banging, has some group (5 or less), threesomes and some male/male. It seems like adding more than just two guys makes these scenes more arousing to me – a female.
The site, All Barebacked, is small and hasn’t updated in 2 years, male/male scenes with one threesome. These scenes are a little on the rougher side.
The last, Boys Club for Men, is a blend of young/old and group, a few of these scenes are very good, the five guys in a spa scene is one of the better gay scenes I have watched.
All in all, it’s one of the better “gay” sites I have joined that also at least caters somewhat to women.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-exclusive content
Cons:
-not as many videos as advertised (497 advertised, more like 90)
-some of the models are subpar
-no photosets except for screencaps
-most of the videos are not HD
-high charge what what content there is
-webcams placed in the videos section instead of the webcam section
-download limits
Bottom Line:
When you buy Boy Locker, you are getting three other sites with the deal: Boy Banged which features older men and twinks (some are rather ugly); School Boy Videos which feature the most videos and some cute twinks; and Gay Teen Boyfriends which only offers two videos.
The site charges $30 recurring or $50 nonrecurring (which is one of the highest rates I have seen for a porn site). The site also is rather misleading in so many ways including how much content it has.
The models shown are cute, but there is no model index which should of been my first warning. Always look for a model or video index before joining a site or buyer beware.
The models themselves are mostly the emo types which is fine if you are into them. They have rather large dicks and seem to like what they are doing. However, many of the models border on ugly which may be the reason there is no index.
If you like Daddy/Twink hook-ups, there are 12 videos on that one section (and others scattered throughout the site.
The bonus section has a few videos from other sites that are streamline only. They are more for advertising than anything else.
There are no photosets available and that is the way it probably will be in the future.
The navigation of the site is OK and the videos are easy enough to download (although I did encounter problems with video freezing on streamed videos). I just wish they would really have the content they advertised. I believe they count the webcams as videos which are a separate entity.
This site needs a lot of improvement before I can recommend it. You don't get much bang for your buck here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The first time I’ve seen a gay casting site. It has his plusses and minuses.
There are 76 scenes that feature a short interview, some solo play, then some sex.
The video quality is very good. All 76 scenes have up to 1080p downloads.
The interviews can be too much information or interesting. A very different vibe from female casting videos.
Has at least one part I will talk about later in the review that is a major turn-on for me and I think for other straight women.
Cons:
I don’t know if they stopped updating or the Covid problems possibly halted production of these scenes. I mention Covid only because these are supposed to be amateur male models. I assume most pro models are tested.
One thing I will never find sexy is a male stripping and teasing like a stripper.
Bottom Line:
This site has a feature that I see as a major turn-on. It really could just be one for me. The guys start off dressed and walk into an office. They are not aroused. The difference in the grow-er and show-er dick. That is fascinating for me to see and watch. Some of the guys drop their pants and underwear and look to be 2-3 inches at most, within a minute or two, they have grown to 5-7 inches. There’s a lot of turn-on in that for me. I don’t have the same turn-on with the show-er type. You also get at least some masturbation at the beginning of the sex casting part.
The interview can be interesting. Some of the guys say they are really bisexual. Others talk about when they knew they liked guys. Maybe it’s just that I haven’t seen gay casting before that makes this so interesting to me? I am used to female casting sites where the questions tend to be, “When did you lose your virginity? How old were you when you started masturbating? What is your favorite position?” These interviews are going into topics I can’t say I have even heard gay men I know talk about.
The sex in the scenes doesn’t seem as genuine as in the sex in the scenes on their other sites and that now makes me question female casting videos. These gay casting videos seem more like the casting director is trying to really see what the aspiring model can do, while female casting seems to be more about the casting director just getting sex.
the site stopped updating right around the time Covid became a pandemic. I hadn’t even thought about the possibility of how a casting site with amateurs could be forced to stop. I don’t know if pro models stay tested so it’s not a problem but bringing someone in off the streets into an enclosed office and exchanging bodily fluids would make the risk even higher. This is a site I would like to see continue or some other site to try. The interviews are interesting, even the too much information ones.
I don’t think this site would convince anyone to join the network, but it is the only time I’ve seen a casting site for gay porn. With the getting to watch the grow-er grow added, it made it a site I liked.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A large gay network of 11 sites.
The network averages 3-4 updates per week.
As a whole, there are 5,047 scenes and 890 male models.
The scenes over the last few years have up to 4K downloads.
There are pictures that can be downloaded.
Cons:
Really poorly named sites that do not offer what the names of the sites say.
Less than 100 solo scenes across the entire network.
Bottom Line:
I only felt one of the sites from this network deserved its own review and I will admit, it is because I not only prefer solo gay, it is really the only gay porn I can get into. This is a good network for gay porn. It’s not that good for straight women looking to get in on the naked men part of gay porn.
The site names could be the most misleading part of the network. One of the sites is named Circle Jerk Boys. It has 1,055 scenes on it. Of those 1,055 scenes, the categories show 45 scenes with masturbation and 4 scenes listed as “orgy”. There are no tags for “group” or “circle jerk”. And looking at the scenes, all I see are ones with two guys having sex.
They weren’t done there. They also have a site called Boyz Party. Looking at the categories on it there are no tags for group or orgy and it lists 3 masturbation scenes with 0 solo scenes. I can see 8 solo scenes on the first page. As professional as everything newer on the network is, these other sites seem to have been left out of the professionalism. The Boyz Party really looks like it could be a good site, it’s just none of the tags or categories are right on it.
The other sites on the network would be good choices for gay men. This network seems to be focused on the gay relationship, love, romance and there are even stories in the scenes. There are plenty of handsome guys on Men Over 30, Extra Big Dicks and I found the Pride Originals to be interesting. It has interviews and the sex scenes are scripted. Sometimes, I think scripted could be better for porn.
Compared to most of the gay sites I have joined, the quality of the videos and photos is much better on Pride. I really could be running into a wall where I cannot relate to what gay men like. Are gay men really that different in sexual interests than straight women? I’m basing that on it seems straight men and lesbians like the same things when it comes to women.
I would recommend it to gay men. I would recommend it to straight women if my separate review for Men Over 30 sounds good to you, but if not, I really believe this network is for gay men. It’s possible even the Pride word being in the title could be telling us that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gay network that is run by the same people as Adult Time. With this many gay sites I have to wonder if they will eventually have a Gay Adult Time or just add all the Gay scenes to Adult Time? This is the second gay network I have reviewed from Gamma.
Nine sites are included and combined they have 4,502 videos.
Videos are downloadable with the subscription I bought, but they do also offer a streaming membership as well, make sure to pay attention when signing up.
This is just an observation: There are more masculine men on this network than other gay networks I have been on. I see the word “bear” a lot and you get the bigger build, hairy (beards, chests) here than on other gay networks.
Currently averaging 4 updates per week.
Plenty of scenes here for straight women to enjoy too.
Cons:
If you have any kind of preconceived notion of what a gay man looks like or acts like, it is probably going to be messed up by this network. A lot of these guys look like big, burly lumberjacks and athletes. I am listing that in cons for the gay men readers who prefer the twinks.
Just an outsider’s opinion, there is not as much to do in gay sex as straight sex. I join gay sites for the solo scenes, but some of these guys in male/male scenes were sexy enough to watch and I just felt like they need to add a woman. That is an idea even. How about a site where a woman masturbates while two men have sex?
Being in my 30s, I really do not see a lot of these guys looking like they’re under 30. I am saying that in response to their site “Men Over 30”. Most of these guys look in their 30s to 40s. There is a total of 2,543 different guys. This is a large network. They also offer photos and their count is just over 250,000 total photos. They have some niches here that I had not seen before like Beards and Bulges, Husbands in Lockdown and I think those could interest straight women.
My main interest is the solo videos. This did create a problem. They do not have categories. They have tags so if you find a solo scene you will see the solo tag, BUT you cannot click it. They have 10-20 tags per scene, but none are clickable. This left me with one option and that was to use the search box. I am getting mixed results with that. A few test examples based on their tags:
I searched for “solo”
Eight of the first twelve scenes that came up are solo. Which is not bad, but it does show a weakness when trying to find specific tags/niches.
I searched for “jerking off” which is one of their tags.
The first problem is it doubled every scene so there is Live Life, Scene #02 listed twice in the first 12 results. Of the first 12 results for jerking off, only 3 are solo guys.
It’s going to take some work to find all the solo scenes, but there is a large collection of them that I have already downloaded (100+).
I don’t know if I am just not very knowledgeable about gay porn or sex, but the site Circle Jerk Boys, which I expected to be a group of guys masturbating together really isn’t. It has a few scenes where the guys are masturbating together, but most of those turn into standard sex.
That is really my biggest complaint. Make the content easier to sort and search. This is the first site (gay, straight, transsexual) I have been on that has tags that are not clickable.
You do get very good quality videos. It is similar to Adult Time’s video download options with 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
It looks like for the current situation with the pandemic they are releasing compilation videos and that is okay with me since I didn’t have any of the content. I cannot speak for gay men, but this network does lean more towards the big, athletic, bear type male models than twinks. Some of the most commonly seen tags are “Athletic”, “Beefy”, “Muscular” and “Jock Strap”.
Besides the issue with finding what you are looking for this is a very good network.
-high quality videos
-high quality photos on some models
-Gorgeous models with many being exclusive to Gay Hoopla alone
-good value for streaming only memberships at $10 a month
-decent amount of videos on tap
Cons:
-navigation of the site could use some improvement
-daily download limits
-most models do not have photo sets
-photos can only be downloaded one at a time
Bottom Line:
There is a new kid in town by the name of Gay Hoopla. Okay, the site has been around for two years but this is the first time I discovered it. I must say, the models are gorgeous college age types with most having natural body hair on them! What a refreshing thing to see these days! Most of the twinkie sites have the models take a razor to their bodies before joining the site. Not this one!
The site has over 200 videos featuring solos as well as duos of the models. The one problem is I can't view the videos before I download them. It could be I haven't found a way to view them yet. I like to watch the video before I use up computer space as well as downloading limits.
The photos are also non zip types which means downloading one at a time. I don't mind this as I only like a few photos from each scene. The quality of the photos is also quite good.
The videos are of high quality except for a few of their earlier ones. Those are still decent, but not as good as the newer stuff.
The site updates quite frequently with new content at about twice a week. Not bad at all considering some don't update at all or recycle older stuff.
There are three tiers of membership available:
-Streaming only at $9.99 a month.
-Streaming and downloading at $29.99 a month recurring
-Streaming and downloading at $39.99 a month one time only fee.
Cancelling is easy as the site goes through well known agencies like Epoch.
Bottom line: I needed to wash the bad taste out of my mouth after dealing with two sites which were rather of poor quality in many ways. Gay Hoopla showed me there are new sites out there who care about their members.
I should add here I love the many times the models shower in the videos. There isn't enough of this in the gay porn world in my opinion. I love watching young men relaxing in the shower. They don't have to jack off or do anything sexual and that's fine with me.
Highly recommended for those into college boys.
(PS: I figured out how to watch the videos! Just click twice.)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Great for fans of Zack Randall
-some cute models
-exclusive content
Cons:
-many models are the homely amatuer types
-the site has stopped updating (but does acknowledge it)
-quality of videos varies from poor to excellent
Bottom Line:
There was a time in the 2000s when thousands of gay porn videos were produced. The quality of the scene and models quite varied. This was done because of the new computer revolution of pornography. It didn't matter about the quality as long as there was quantity. And that is a problem with sites like Zack Randall.
Zack Randall was a cute twink porn star who did videos for many companies at the time. He had a hairy body and a big, uncut penis along with a great face. Mr Randall has collected most of his videos and offered them in this site.
The site also grabs many of the mentioned videos from the top as his scenes would not make a site with much content. These videos are rather the same smorgasbord offered by so many other sites these days.
The models range from twinks to jocks and mature to rugged. Many are homely (which some may find attractive) and others are well just there.
The site itself costs $24.95 (there is a special going on as of this review of $14.95 a month) a month or $49.95 for three months. All are recurring unless canceled.
This is a site to get when first starting out in porn as the older stuff will be new to the member. For old pros like me, it is there for recollecting Zack Randall's body of work. (I do think he is adorable).
There is a models guide which many of these types of sites don't usually have. Take a look and if you like what you see, then join up for the lower cost. If you only like Mr Randall, then the price is worth it for him alone.
Beware of checked boxes as the site owner is known for placing them in randomly. I guess they want to keep us on our toes.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
