Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Launched in 2004. Mostly focused on girl-girl action (some hardcore ff/m and m/f action but that's an exception, not the rule)
- Picture galleries really stand out. While most sites do them at twisty's they shine.
- High-quality video. It's gotta be 1080 at least cause it looks amazing on my old monitor (no 4K for me)
- as of September 3, 2021, 3519 scenes
- Amazing talent. All my favorite MYLFs are here (Lauren Philips, Brandi Love, Cherie DeVille, Britney Amber), along with lots of new stars (my sense is that many new girls start out with girl/girl shoots). I particularly liked finding: Scarlett Bloom, Kadence Marie, Molly Stewart (and while I'd seen here before ALEX COAL is fantastic)
- Tags available
- Good descriptions of each shoot
- Streaming player has advanced controls (skip 10sor 30s, volume, full-screen toggle)
- like/dislike, favorite, watch later allow for flexible scene sorting.
- short plots than straight to the action
- never a bad shoot Light/audio/drct. all good
Cons:
PROS CONT:
- diversity in casting (tattoos, age, ethnicity. Not body shape pretty much everyone is "porn star perfect"
- excellent search features the "filter" really helps narrow down what you're looking for.
- Updates come once a week
CONS
- download will cost you extra (one fee gets you both .zip downloads of photo galleries and video shoots).
- ads behind the paywall. Heck, you have to click past an ad every time you log back in.
- No previewing/trailer available. So you have to check out the pictures or skip through the video to see if it's your thing
- most models have boob jobs. I love all shapes and sizes but I know some have a real aversion to augmentation.
- cross-sales are everywhere. It would be nice if they threw the occasional shoot from one of those sites at you just to see if it was up your alley
Bottom Line:
I *hate* the way the industry is moving toward low prices to get in with streaming extra fees for downloads. I know it's fighting the tube sites and such but still, this old-timer doesn't like it one bit. I feel like I'm constantly being hit up for money.
I generally don't buy many girl/girl sites but this one exceeded my expectations. Normally these sites can be overly repetitive; not at twisty's they did a good job of keeping the action moving and different in each scene (that said focus here is on mainstream and
not kink porn).
I went in for a year membership (I figured with streaming-only I didn't want to be rushed in testing them out). While I'm not disappointed. I won't be re-upping either. My main motivation was wanting to check out Holly Randell's work. I've been listening to her podcasts and wanted to see it for myself (twisty's is also a sponsor of her podcast) so I guess advertising works)
I went with a B+ grade because they do everything well but are not killing it. I think there must be better all-girl stuff out there somewhere. I like that they have good organization and a deep catalog. But the big killers are not being able to download (I'm sure others know how to cheat that - but I'm not interested). Also holding them back is a general timidness. There's no character here. Other than all girl/girl what's the hook? (Maybe I'm jaded and that should be enough - fair enough)
Twisty's is above average in every way (booking/directing/production) I don't think I saw a bad shoot of anything in the last 2 years). That said there's nothing that's standout or exemplary either. They do very well. But they're not pushing themselves (and maybe they don't need to, to hit the target audience they're going for)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
For people that love lesbian and solo scenes, this can be an interesting network. It has a lot to offer in terms of body type and ethnicity. For the most part, models are good and they know how to move in front of a camera.
There is a lot of choice in terms of content. Do you prefer soft and sweet girl\girl actions? Then Sapphic Erotica got you covered. Are you a fan of fisting? Fist Flush has some very good videos. Do you like to watch girls masturbating? Give Me Pink offers a good catalogue. There are even interviews with girls that shot for Sapphix, if you want to have more details. For every video there is also an attached photo gallery
You can download films on your device with no extra cost, which is not at all granted, as a lot of websites make you pay extra for this feature.
There are also some live shows with chat. Personally it is not my cup of tea, however it is a nice addition to the package.
Cons:
The website has a quite outdated design. It looks and feels like one of those free tubes. It is not a premium experience to me. If you usually watch porn on your mobile devices, avoid this network at all costs: it works very well on computers, but on my android phone and tablet it is slow, the player is clunky and lacks options, plus the buffering is eternal. Considering that people tend to navigate on the Internet with smartphones, I would say that this is not a wise strategy.
Bottom Line:
Sapphix Network is a quite decent package if you are really into lesbian porn. They are on the market for a lot of years, therefore I do not understand why they don't offer a better user experience, redesigning the layout a little and optimizing the content.
Videos are in Full HD, which is fine, but more and more premium porn networks are offering 4K definition for the same amount of money. It is granted at this point. They really should step up their game.
I personally think that this can be a good purchase, if the subscription would be around 15 dollars per month. Paying 30 bucks for this, is definitely too expensive, considering that there are better alternatives on the market.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining any site in the small network gives you access to 5 sites.
The 5 sites are listed in the Bottom Line section of this review.
-Navigation is basically simple.
-There is a text file that describes the action of the video very well.
-Also, plenty of tags to describe the action of the video. So search is easy and can be very detailed, if you want it to.
-Newer videos have a definition of 320p through 4K. The 4K video file size is around 3.35 GB for a 23 minute runtime video, so the coding seems efficient.
-The content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is poor. Other PU members have written that they find the models to be attractive. I disagree completely. I respect the opinion of these PU members, but find it hard to agree with their opinion.
-I find the quality of the videos and photo sets to be poor. The images are not crystal clear, but either slightly unfocused or with a slight haze to the image. But since the models are not attractive to begin with, I wouldn't mind watching the video with the images in complete darkness, so I wouldn't have to view the models at all. (That is a joke, but also has an element of truth. These models are far below the attractive level of the Teen Mega World models, and comparing the models at Wet and Puffy to the models at the Wow sites is like comparing night and day: the Wow site models are fucking georgeous; the Wet and Puffy models are unappetizing.
-The online mechanism for viewing photo sets is clunky. Slow to load images.
-Pre-checked cross-sale.
Bottom Line:
The 5 sites of this network include:
Wet and Puffy We Like To Suck
Wet and Pissy
Simply Anal
Eurobabe Facials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Membership in any one site gives you access to all 5 sites.
The stats for Wet and Puffy network:
Over 27000 photos. and
Over 480 models.
They advertise that the photos are the best ultra high definition picture sets.
They advertise that the tags, filters and layout of each page makes browsing simple.
The thumbnails that illustrate the models have washed out colors.
Even models that appear young and attractive at competing sites look plain and unattractive at this site, in the photo sets and videos.
You examine a photo in a photo set, and it appears as if the photo was taken with a filter that makes the model appear slightly out of focus.
Each photo set has 2 definition zip files, low and high.
The low definition is 666 x 1000 pixels.
The high definition is 2267 x 3400 pixels.
In the photos, the models are uniformly unattractive. They are plain-looking women. You go to a local mall, you find plenty of good-looking teens or twenty-year-olds. The models at this site are mainly in their twenties or thirties, and they are far less attractive than the normal twenty-thirty-year-old you find at your local mall. One reason is the photos have washed-out colors, so the skin tones of the models are not pleasing. A second reason is the models themselves are below-average in level of physical looks. Plus many of the models have lots of tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Even though the site advertises "best ultra high definition picture sets", I look at sets and feel the quality is far below the quality of any photo site, in any technical feature you can think of: these photo sets are shit. Teen Mega World, which is a hardcore teen site, has photo sets that are far superior in technical quality to the photo sets at Wet and Puffy. The the quality of the teen models at Teen Mega World is far superior in attractiveness to the Wet and Puffy models.
The Wet and Puffy models are mainly plain to unattractive. The photos are not worth collecting. They aren't even worth viewing.
Note: some of the live cam girls are really attractive.
Note: my opinion seems to be in the minority.
There are some attractive models at this site, but they are not presented attractively at the site. Delphine and Nika O, two girls who normally look very attractive at other sites, look washed out (in color and skin tones) and blah at this site. How a girl is photographed can make a huge difference in her appearance. Besides which, most of the models at this site are not that attractive to begin with.
Maybe I should have my eyes checked. I look for attractive girls at this site and can't find any. Some of the girls are attractive at other sites, but not at this site. I know that beauty is supposed to be in the eye of the beholder. The average female at any local mall, or even your local grocery store or Walmart, is far more attractive than the models at Wet and Puffy.
Maybe my problem is expectations: I assume that most models are chosen for their looks. But at this site, I think they were chosen for performing hardcore sex. Without bothering to filter for attractiveness.
The photo play mechanism for viewing photos online is clunky. Images are slow to load. The images themselves are poor in color, poor in clarity. You aren't viewing sharply defined images of the model.
The composition of the photo is poor. The sets are inexpensive or cheap and lacking in any imagination.
Overall, the photo sets are a waste of storage space, and not worth viewing.
I was a member of this site before, and wrote a review that highlighted how poor the site was, in terms of the attractiveness of the models, the poor quality of the photo sets. But my memory is poor, and I forgot how unappealing the site was. Which is the reason I rejoined. I was stupid.
Other PU members seem to appreciate the site much more than I do. They cite the attractive models at the site, the ease of navigation, the low membership price. I agree the membership price can be low: PU has the first month's membership for $15, or $60 for a year.
I agree that navigation is simple and effective, that Vendo and Epoch are fine billers.
But I can't agree the models are attractive.
Poor models, poor photography. And that kills the site for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Young, cute, college-aged, pretty lesbian sex.
More hardcore in some scenes than I expected.
Scenes are mostly over 30 minutes, with some nearing one hour, good stories and setup.
There are subtitles, but the scenes I watched are speaking English. They do have other language subtitles too.
Updates twice per month, currently 468 scenes with downloadable videos and downloadable pictures.
The video quality is excellent. All scenes have at least 1080p, with the newer ones having 4K.
Cons:
I listed the more hardcore scenes as a pro, but they do a very good job on the more softer, teasing style scenes. I don’t know if they should just try sticking to one way or the other.
The older scenes include some solo which I’m not really into with these young models. They are not very sensual by themselves.
Bottom Line:
I have a love/hate relationship with the younger female models porn scenes. I have tried multiple teen sites and find myself bored with the solo scenes of these models who don’t even give me the idea they know what they’re even doing. It could be nerves or shyness, but that’s the hate side of it for me. When you put two or three (a lot of these scenes have more than 2 females) females together you at least get a little more sensuality and even aggressiveness from them.
There is some inconsistency from scene to scene. I don’t know if they maybe alternate producers or writers, but some of the scenes are so good they make some of the other scenes seem poor. One of the best scenes I have seen is their newest one. It is two college young women watching a movie and they decide to masturbate together. I think they could have stopped there and the scene would have been great. Instead, it turns into a lesbian scene where the action doesn’t replace the eroticism lost from them masturbating together. I am being critical of a job I wouldn’t want to have. I wouldn’t want to decide this is when you all are going to stop being innocent and become horny nymphos. That scene is stuck in my head. They started out, believably nervous about even masturbating together, then 10 minutes later, they were in full 69 and going at it like pros. I haven’t been in that situation so I don’t know if it would progress that quickly.
The models are very pretty and cute. There’s some ethnic diversity. The production is very good. The stories are believable. The sex is even believable, but not to the level that I would believe these are real lesbians. I’m not even for sure that’s what they want you to believe. The scenes rely more on tease, seduction, which would be more in the realm of bicurious or even straight becoming bicurious.
The video quality is close to as good as I think you can get. They have downloads from 160p up to 1080p on all 468 scenes, with around 40-50 of the scenes having 4K. The most enjoyable part for me -- and it goes back to the young ages, is everything that happens before the pussy licking starts. The kissing, touching, and masturbating together, I like that style with these younger models. There are a few things I haven’t seen much of and those include strap-ons or tribadism. The writers could convince me the young models do not know about tribadism, but it does seem strap-ons with young models would be commonplace.
The site would score higher with more consistency. It jumps from three college young women being silly and playful to two college young women being serious and showing similar to real feelings of love. There’s the inconsistency of being near hardcore in one scene to softcore in the next. That may be subjective to me since it does give some variety, but it does seem like the women I want to see do the hardcore, stick with the softcore and the ones I want to see doing softcore do the more hardcore scenes. That definitely is subjective and should detract from the overall content. It’s a great lesbian site and the stories along with production and high technical quality push it up my list as one of the better lesbian sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of my first times trying Kink out. This is one of the better sites for my taste in porn.
High-powered machines with dildos on them being used on women in various ways.
The scenes are long, I would even say that is part of the “pain”. Most are 40-60 minutes.
The remastered versions of their older videos have 1080p downloads.
Lots of squirting, writhing orgasms, messy orgasms, this is a site that I believe we can be assured is showing real orgasms.
All scenes are downloadable, but the highest download option on most is 720p
Cons:
No longer updates, but it is all new to me.
The noise of the machines, the women screaming, moaning, sadly, to me takes away some of the eroticism.
Would be hard to justify as a purchase by itself. The scenes, even though I like them, are very similar.
Bottom Line:
I joined Kink two other times in the past, but did not look into all the sites and even once, joined Kink Men, without realizing it gave me full access to the whole network. Nearly everything on the network is harder than I like or prefer, but I like to try different things.
There’s no story or plot or any secret about these scenes. A woman is going to lay down on a table, possibly strapped (bondage) to the table or against a wall, there are multiple variations as to how they position the women. Some have ball gags in their mouth which I believe helps with the noise level. I feel bad for saying that, but some of the scenes are unwatchable based on all the noise mixed with the women’s screams.
The last update was on August 20, 2020 and it was a remastered Sasha Grey scene. I have noticed most of the sites on Kink have a lot of recent remasters. The only difference I see in those is they have a 1080p download option. With the length of these videos they are large files even in 720p.
I think what I liked most about it and it’s why my score is positive is that the models are often mainstream porn models. This seems like a niche made for amateurs, but the mainstream models, many of which are sexy, show a side of these models that you don’t see in their mainstream scenes. I’m not sure if that is a good thing -- for the porn industry as a whole, there are some known “innocent and sweet” models on here showing they are wild and experienced, but that’s what happens when a woman watches too much porn. I start noticing things that are not that important to the point of the scene.
I believe the other strong point is you’re seeing real orgasms on this site. There’s not a way to fake an 8 inch dildo hammering inside the woman for 40 minutes. There is squirting, puddling, sticky messes and the women do talk about the experience. They all seem very pleased and satisfied!
The rest of the site is basic, but that’s not a detraction. The scenes are laid out 20 to a page, the download options on the majority of scenes are 720p, 540p, 360p, 288p and 270p. There are pictures, but it seems like to me this is the one site where pictures are not useful. There’s too much movement.
I would recommend it to anyone like me who is interested in something different and tries Kink out. I believe this is the least hardcore or possibly “offensive” of their sites. They do excellent work with the cameras and in making the models at least seem comfortable.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site is part of the X Empire network of 5 sites.
So you get access to 5 sites with your membership.
-The good-quality photosets have a zip file.
-There are model indexes: one for the network, a different index for each individual site.
-The model's page has links to her videos.
-There is a cheaper streaming membership. Downloads require a more expensive membership.
-Videos come with lots of tags describing the video. They have a text description of the video that's so brief it's worthless.
For example, the complete text description for a Scarlit Scandal video is: "Scarlit Scandal loves her ass spanked while she's being fucked and Jax Slayher makes sure to turn Scarlit's cheeks red as he plunges his piece deep into her pussy." The tags do a much better job describing the video.
-Members can add comments on the model's page. Useless, except for fans wanting to show their appreciation of the model.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-No information for the models (except for a generic name).
-Ads on member pages. Easy to ignore, because they are placed at the bottom of the page.
-Most of the models at the site are White, but there are a few Black, Asian, and Latina models.
Bottom Line:
The site is based on real life events (I read that from a motion picture, but it adds meaning to the sex shown in these videos: think of your sister, your mother, your grandmother, exploding with lust when they are with the women of their dreams.)
The site theme is lesbian sex.
The sex featured at Lesbian X is young teens and MILFs, so you get a mix of young teens and attractive older women.
The site has 140 videos.
Videos have your choice of definition from 360p through 4K. The 4K option was added a few years back for the newer posted videos. Before that, the highest resolution was 1080p.
You can stream the full video, or a trailer for video.
There is an accompanying photoset for each video.
Photosets range from 99 photos to over 400 photos.
The soundtrack for many of the videos is an overpowering music beat. Either turn the volume down, or mute the volume and put on the song "I Want To Know What Love Is" by Foreigner, to heighten the mood. That song is a much better background than the canned music in these lesbian videos.
The videos are standard lesbian videos: lots of kissing, licking, sucking, stroking, some use of toys. The models are surprisingly clean: not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of models with over-large breast implants. The sets and costumes are nice.
I thought the lesbian videos were pretty much plain vanilla: although the models are making lots of noises to show excitement, the videos lack real heat. I've seen some videos at Teen Fidelity, Rocco Siffredi or other sites that had real heat. That I thought were arousing.
Lesbian X is a different approach where the performers are acting more naturally. However, when I say they are acting more naturally, what I mean is that these models are role-playing for cash, there's little or no real passion. In spite of the moans and groans and squirting.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
The site doesn't impress me much.
Although the models are clean and attractive, the models at other sites can be more attractive.
The update rate is slow and irregular: There have been 9 new videos in the last 12 months.
The content is exclusive.
Navigation is easy.
But there's little that's exciting to watch at this site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discount of $9.95 for the first month. Recurring at $24.95/mo.
-Exclusive content.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-User name is your email address, and you can choose your password, so they are easy to remember.
-Video choice of definition: 240p through 1080p. No 4K available for the site.
-Since the site focuses on female solo masturbation, the tags do a fine job describing the sex action of the video.
-They have a text listing of all the model names at the network (without any thumbnails).
You click on a model's name, it brings up the model's page, with large-sized thumbnails of the model, her videos at the network, and hot links to her content, with a very brief physical description of her attributes.
-PornDoe has a live cam channel. I'm not into live cams, so I didn't explore the channel.
Except the thumbnails show a lot of cute girls.
And there are some free videos and clips, mainly from Club Sweethearts, which is the new name for Club Seventeen.
Cons:
-Poor navigation. For a relatively small site, the site layout is poor.
Sometimes the whole network is fucking stupid.
You might have to navigate (click) through 2 pages of ads to get to the site you want to examine.
Sometimes they present the site in a foreign language, instead of the English language I'm familiar with.
Sometimes you are logged out of the network when you switch channels, and when you try to log back in, you have to click through 2 separate pages of ads before you reach the home page.
-There are ads on every page in the members area, once you get past the 2 separate pages that are only ads.
-Archive site. The last update was apparently Sep 04, 2017.
-They have a photoset for each video, but the photosets contain maybe 10 to 14 photos per set, and are not worth collecting.
-Two pre-checked cross-sales on join page. Be sure to uncheck the cross-sales, because they are limited trials that quickly turn into expensive memberships.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-There is a download limit of 100 videos per month, for the network. A download from any site in the network counts toward that limit.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Quest For Orgasm has 80 Scenes. So it's a small site. But you get access to the Lets Doe It network, which has around 15 sites. The star of the network is The White Boxxx, where they select attractive models and present them in glamcore style as some of the finest, most attractive models on the internet.
-You can sort the videos by newest, most popular, most viewed, or by longest.
-The models range from OK-looking, to attractive, to very attractive. But much more effort is put into making the models more attractive and glamorous at some of the other sites in the network, especially The White Boxxx site.
The models are white, Eastern European girls, late teens to early 30s.
The videos have a runtime from about 28 minutes to about 40 minutes at Quest For Orgasm.
The videos start out with an interview with the model, her life, why she got into porn, what she likes about porn, her hobbies. Trying to make the models seem real, that the models are normal people. After the interview, the model takes off her clothes and uses different toys to achieve orgasm.
Aside from the lousy navigation (the ads, the site time-outs), I didn't find most of the masturbation scenes that erotic. There is no fantasy element. It's porn stars using dildos to achieve orgasm.
Add that it's an archive site with no new content.
Add that there's little effort put into making the models attractive.
I signed up for a one-year membership to the network.
But the increased ads and the fast time-out and the increased difficulty of using the network mean this is my last membership to the network.
I don't have the patience to keep clicking through to find the content that I like.
That's in spite of how gorgeous some of these models are.
This is one of the poorer sites in the network.
I'm giving the site a score of 71.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
It's still here. There are new girl/girl scenes updated once a week, many with hot models like Gianna Dior, Eliza Ibarra, Vanna Bardot, Scarlit Scandal, Emily Willis, etc. The site currently shows 1,438 videos and 1,311 photo sets. Videos look good at 720 p. New photos download at 3265 X 1837.
Cons:
For whatever reason, Twisty's has been straight-out gutted in the past 13 months. TBP's December 2019 review refers to 8,638 videos and 18,350 photo sets. I'm sure that's accurate. Since that time, 7,200 videos and 17,049 photo sets have been removed from the site. Nicole Graves' site, which used to be part of Twisty's Network - gone. Nicole Graves herself, who was 1 of Twisty's most popular models has 1 scene on the site. Annete Dawn's site - gone. Blue Fantasies - gone. Euro Foxes has 4 scenes. Mom Knews Best - last updated March 2019. Amy Reid, who had many great scenes on the site - 0 content. Susanna Spears, who had many great scenes on the site - 0 content. Devon, who had a lot of great stuff on the site - 0 content. Etc, etc. If I had to guess, I would say that only the exclusive material is still here, and not much of that.
Bottom Line:
Twisty's used to be a special site before it was sold to Brazzers' parent company. They took a site that was one of several sites that just licensed material from various producers and made it special by a) producing increasing amounts of exclusive material and b) caring about the site and its members - with a forum & GREAT customer service. Now it's a site that's being gutted for who knows what reason with diminishing updates starting last month. Up to December 19, there were updates every 3-5 days, then the Christmas present was for updates to slow down to once a week. I have this site as an add-on that I got years ago, so I've got no reason to give it up, though it's sad how much material I no longer have access to. I can't give it lower than a 60 given that they are still updating with pretty hot babes, but be aware that if you are expecting the glory days of Twisty's, or even expecting the content from the glory days of Twisty's to still be here, you're very likely to find yourself terribly disappointed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Nearly all solo girl content of some very attractive European models.
- Has some variation in the scenes including speculum and bigger insertions, reminds me a lot of Give Me Pink.
- Very high quality on the video downloads.
- Good download speed (80% of my max)
- Uses Epoch as the biller.
- Downloadable photos in low quality or high quality.
- Updates once per week.
Cons:
- Pre-checked cross sale at sign-up
- Anytime you’re dealing with a solo site you’re going to run into the potential of the scenes being too similar.
Bottom Line:
I would say to anyone that is a fan of Give Me Pink, you should give this site a try as the shooting style and action itself is similar to it.
The main selling point of a solo site is the looks of the models and how believable they are. These are European models so you’re not going to get a lot of dirty talk or feedback from the models to go by and I think that does hurt a little, at least now in 2020, years ago we didn’t care about something like that. The models here are mostly white with a few darker models. The body types are in-between slender and average. I would say they are all attractive.
There are 979 scenes just on this site and you also get access to 4 other sites. The site has a few scenes that are not solo with a second woman helping but those are rare. I think most people that are into solo porn would be just as happy if there weren’t scenes with more than one woman. The solo content they have here does have some teasing in it and that to me, is a major part of solo porn. If the model can’t get you interested or keep you interested you’re probably not going to watch her masturbate either. You’re not going to find any soon to be major solo stars on this site. That’s also one of the frustrating parts about liking solo porn. You could watch 10 scenes and every other one could be considered poor. I think solo porn brings in your own fantasies and because of that what I may like, you may not like.
These scenes are good enough to give a try if you’re into solo porn. They have nice photo sets with usually 100+ photos in each. The models are often clothed at the beginning of the scenes and at least try to tease. The photos can be downloaded as zips. The video download options stand out as well. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p, 320p and a WMV version as well. Each scene also has a trailer if you want to watch a little before downloading the full scene. If you give it a try make sure to make note of this, the photo zip downloads are in with the video downloads. At first, I didn’t think they had any photo downloads, but they do and give you a low and high option.
The site also has a very deep, I’m going to say, too deep of a search engine that gives you hundreds of options to choose from in your search. I tried a few of the more obscure looking options and got 0 results. That’s why I say it’s too deep. Still the site is part of a full network that comes with 4 other sites including some pissing fetish sites. Their quality is plenty good. Their navigation is as well. There’s not a lot to complain about and they also use Epoch as a biller so it’s easy to subscribe and cancel.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hardcore lesbian porn with a few guys making recent appearances
- 555 scenes as of 11/27/2020 with 3 updates per week during current times.
- Video downloads at 320p, 480p, 720p and 1080p.
- Decent quality photo downloads that are 90% screencaptures.
- Good download speed at 80% of my max.
- Mostly fun scenes even if they’re trying to be more hardcore.
Cons:
- Some of the older scenes have been removed.
- It could be easier to find scenes/actions with better tags.
Bottom Line:
Hot and Mean has been around a long time. There’s reason to believe early in the site’s life there were maybe some problems that caused them to have to remove some of the scenes. I do remember the site being more hardcore in the earlier days. It’s a little more advanced when it comes to lesbian porn. You will see some slapping, even some spitting but it’s hardly violent or anything like you would see on a Kink channel.
They have a large collection of 555 scenes. This is growing quickly as the updates have sped up to 3 per week. I want to say there was even a time they had stopped updating this site but something must have changed. They do not have any 4K videos. The newer videos have 1080p, 720p, 480p and 320p. The 1080p videos are nice and crisp. The 720p are even good quality. The photos could be better quality and they could have more photos of the models in their clothes before the scenes start but that’s not really a big deal or anything to complain too much about. You can download them in a zip.
The name of the site gives you an idea of what the content is like. There is usually one of the models who is being the “mean” one. Their definition of mean is broad. It could be that she’s bratty and wants the other model to do what she wants. That is a change from the old content. The older content had more of the degrading talk and slaps.
I will add that if you join be sure to join through PU/TBP. I received full downloads by going through the PU links. Those downloads usually cost $15 extra.
The models are your standard hardcore American models. There are some tattoos, some implants but overall, the models are very attractive. You will get some inconsistent performances with some of the models being the typical “just here for a check” models. It’s still a large site and has a lot of good content it that gives you a little different view of lesbian porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Incredibly hot messy female orgasm site.
There are 66 models, some have multiple scenes.
69 scenes, probably the only time I will ever get to say that number in a review with two updates per month.
Reading all the reviews by males talking about the female cum in the scenes is fake. I will leave it at that.
Video and photo quality is exceptional and are available in unlimited downloads.
Easy to cancel and navigate except for a few bugs
Cons:
If you go to the model list it will show you 24 models, if you click to go to the next page it shows you the same 24 models as page 1 and if you click on page 3 it shows you the same 24 models from page 1. The dropdown box does work for finding all the models.
Upsells are everywhere. They also show you scenes from sites you don’t have access to.
Maybe it fits better in cons, reading the reviews by males talking about the female cum in the scenes is fake.
Bottom Line:
I probably need to clarify my pro/con jabbing at the male reviewers for saying the female cum in these scenes is fake. It may be in some of the scenes, but from the looks of the scenes they are editing and cutting parts throughout the scenes. I am not -- as a woman, going to say the female cum is fake. It takes a very relaxed and aroused woman to produce a messy orgasm like is seen in these scenes. Some sex toys like the Magic Wand Plus are known, especially in edging a female, to cause very messy orgasms. What I notice is the women are usually very wet and starting to show messiness near the beginning of the scenes. That makes me think they are being prepped prior to the sex starting. There also is a lot of male giving the female oral sex before the intercourse starts. I am not trying to be hard on the male reviewers, but I can say women can cum that much. I am also not insinuating they are just not taking the females they have been with to that level. As I started this, I said the female needs to be very relaxed and aroused. A lot of women are insecure about showing that much sexual energy. Either way, I really love this site and hope it will update more once the pandemic is over.
This is a site that doesn’t really need stories or plots. It’s about the female’s pleasure. Which is different from 99% of straight porn out there. The models are all professionals. They are mostly young, though a few MILF models are present and they are believably horny. Despite little to no story there are scenes with extended setups like public masturbation and flashing before the scene starts. Which would also lend to the female being aroused before the guy even touches her. Is it really that hard for guys to believe a woman could get even more aroused about sex than a man does?
The site could be bigger though I picked the right time to review this since there are 69 scenes. I don’t think you will see many 69s, at least not in my memory of the scenes I have watched. With only 2 updates per month it will take a long time for this site to have a lot of scenes, but hopefully, they will stick to the current style or formula instead of making it less erotic just to produce more scenes. I will say there isn’t one scene I plan on skipping over.
The download options are another major positive. Each of the 69 scenes can be downloaded in 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The pictures are not as impressive at 1500x1000 and the downloadable sets only have 30-50 pictures in them with most of them being taken during the sex parts.
The only thing I can find to complain about is the size of the site, but in my few years of experience of porn viewing and collecting, I usually look at a site’s size by how many scenes I want to download, not by how many scenes they have. Most sites I join, even ones with thousands of scenes, only have 50-100 scenes I download. This one has 69.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very cheap at $9.95 a month
Vendo is a biller I trust
968 videos and part of five site network as well
Stockings and pantyhose in many scenes
Has been updating once a week during pandemic
Works well on my cell phone.
Cons:
For me the models are hit and miss as to their looks
Too much standard masturbation porn aimed at men.
Bottom Line:
Wet and Puffy has a lot to like about it. At $9.95 a month I took a chance as I like to see women masturbating. I swear I am not a lesbian, but I have had offers where I was tempted.
It is a very large site with 968 videos and a very large network is included. When I took the tour before signing up I saw a lot of videos with stockings and pantyhose, so I thought what do I have to lose? The models use all kinds of toys and methods to get off. I saw a lot of dildos and wands. I also saw them using a pussy pump and wondered why would they do that? How would that feel? What I realized is that they do this to make their pussies look bigger and more inviting for men to look at. I did not find pumped pussies to be sexy and I think men would like this type of scene more than I did. I like to see wet pussies shaking with real earth moving orgasms.
The models are Eastern European pros who were mostly very much eye candy. But as I watched more and more videos I realized their looks were hit and miss. Many did nothing for me. They often seemed like they were just going through the motions and lacked enthusiasm. In most scenes I thought they had real orgasms, but they rarely seemed to be having fun. I like masturbation scenes with models losing themselves in the heat of the moment, maybe even to the point of forgetting they are on camera.
To the site’s credit I must add that I saw a fair amount of anal play and even some dp. Since many of the scenes can only be called extreme, there were many that were exciting to watch. There are just so many scenes that I did find quite a few worth keeping. I also discovered Ria Sunn, a blond beauty that I thought was just too pretty to ignore. I am a big fan of hers after seeing her here.
I think 80 is fair score as it is a very large site at a low price.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Pegging and anti-pegging action
163 scenes but is no longer updating.
Sexy male and female models. Including many mainstream models.
Has some of the first mainstream pegging scenes, dated as 2000.
Video quality varies, but most of the scenes have at least a 720p option, the newest ones have 1080p, the oldest ones are maxed at 480p.
Scenes also have photo downloads and the videos are usually long (anti-pegging causes longer)
Cons:
No new updates, the older video quality is not very good.
This will never be a niche for everyone.
Bottom Line:
I believe the best pegging site is Divine Bitches on Kink's Network. For those that don't know what pegging is it is when a woman uses a strap-on dildo on a man anally. Anti-pegging is considered his reward of getting to have sex with her after she is finished. I think the first mainstream male performer willing to do pegging was Christian XXX. He was also one of the first mainstream male performers willing to do scenes with transsexuals. He has a lot of scenes on this site including the oldest scene from 2000. While pegging hasn't ever had a big following this site surprised even me with mainstream female stars like Jynx Maze, Kristina Rose, Brooklyn Lee and Megan Foxx taking on the role of the pegger.
I do think the better scenes on this site are as good as Divine Bitches scenes. Pegging isn't something I have tried, but it does seem sadistically erotic to think a man would even want to have sex with a woman after she used a strap-on on him and I do believe that is a strong part of my attraction to the pegging scenes. Being from India, the mention of sticking something up a man's butt would get you possibly stoned -- and I'm not talking about drugs. The guys in these scenes are all common performers in this niche and most of them are very masculine, handsome guys.
There are 163 scenes to download or stream. The site looks like a lot of niche sites. There are some scenes from the early 2000s, things picked up around 2010 and started slowing back down around 2014-15. More than half of the videos have 720p and around 1/3 have 1080p as the highest download option. The rest have 480p as their max resolution. Divine Bitches is the same way when it comes to resolution quality. A lot of their best scenes are only available in 480p.
I believe this site is a good representation of what is known as "fair play". If she gets to stick that dildo up your butt, you get to have sex with her. I know this is an assumption on my part, but I think the sex with the female receiving looks more real after she has stuck the dildo up the guy's butt. I don't know if maybe they form some kind of otherworldly bond from the role reversal, but the scenes are all good and worth downloading for fans of pegging and anti-pegging. I can only recommend it to those who know pegging and like it. For anyone else, maybe take a peek at it and see if you think you would like it.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful models stretching themselves out for all variations of masturbation.
Long, slow becoming fervor masturbation that clearly shows orgasms.
404 scenes with updates seeming to stop 2 months ago.
The site is easy to use with simple searches or complicated if you want to jump into the advanced search.
The scenes include a long video (by masturbation standards) and photo set. Downloads are unlimited.
No ads that I have seen.
Cons:
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes.
Bottom Line:
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes.
Bottom Line:
I see this type of site as being something porn fans will either love or dislike, not hate. You are going to see a lot of spread pussies. There is some teasing. There is some anal play. There is a beautiful model in the same setting as the previous beautiful model spreading her pussy, teasing and possibly playing anally. Some of the models seem to be made for this kind of porn. Their scenes are very good. They love being watched, they love teasing, they love you seeing them having an orgasm. I think if that sounds good to you, you will love the site. If you need more than one person you will probably dislike the site.
It makes me think a site like this is where every gynecologist found their interest in becoming a gynecologist! I do see a site like this as female-positive. The models look stunning, you would not expect them to jump up in a chair and start spreading their legs looking like they do. They look more like they are going out on a nice date. Hopefully, someone bought them a nice dinner before they put on these performances.
The video quality is great, but inconsistent. Of the newest updates, two of the 4 newest do not have 4K, while the other 40-50 do have 4K. That makes me think they may have recycled old scenes. That was a newer term to me until recently. If you are interested in the 4K versions of these videos, you better have a lot of hard drive space and a fast internet connection as some of those are as big as 15 Gigabytes per scene. They do offer lower, in my opinion, better options with the 720p and 1080p versions. The photos add a nice touch. These photos show the model before the scene starts.
There are some unbelievable insertions, but those are in the older scenes. One has a woman masturbating with a baseball bat! The camerawork is a positive or negative for the site. There are a lot of close-ups. I believe close-ups during masturbation are only good if the model is rubbing her clitoris. If her fingers are inside her or a toy is inside her it doesn't make much sense to me to go close-up. I would classify this as a fetish site even though there are no definitive fetishes being played to unless, the pussy, is a fetish. All you need to ask yourself is do you want to look at 400 pussies? That is why I said I don't think any porn fan would hate the site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Overwhelmingly large lesbian site that has content from as far back as 2003.
Over 1,000 models.
1,816 scenes with new updates being posted every 3 days.
Each scene includes downloadable photos and videos.
Advanced search allows the user to filter multiple tags.
Very attractive models, could possibly be a con.
Good price for all the content you get access to.
Cons:
There is a professional feel to everything. The models are nearly all Europeans and the porn feels that way.
The advanced search will likely confuse just as many people as help them.
Consistency is not always a good trait.
Bottom Line:
This is my first time joining this site. While I am open to lesbian content, it is not my favorite and I have to be in the mood for it. This site is a good example of that. I won't deny the quality of the content or the beauty of the models, but some of the content feels forced, scripted and the newer scenes do not offer much variety. The professional feeling is a con to me. Everything looks like a porn set. This automatically loses me a little bit. You can even use the advanced search to see the actions used in each scene go in phases. It's like they pick up on what's popular and use it in every scene until it's no longer popular then they find something new to add.
That is more my subjective opinion. I have been using lesbian sites like Girls Out West which is on the other end of the spectrum. Some of the scenes here are outstanding. It does seem to matter who the models are. Which offers some inconsistency, but the production is highly consistent. I would like to see more action letting the women work within the scene without so much direction.
From an objective view there isn't much wrong. They list 1,000 models, but it looks like more than that to me as one page says, "Our latest 1,000 models". They have a little of everything too. See a short list of what all different actions they have in their scenes.
374 scenes with 69.
298 scenes with at least 3 girls.
57 scenes with fisting.
95 scenes with tribbing (I don't agree with their number on that one, it seems much higher)
74 scenes with strap-on dildos.
The video quality is very good, they have 1080p downloads available on some scenes from 2004 and 2005. Starting in 2006-07, all videos have 1080p and for the last year or two they added 4K. Many attractive models, high quality video downloads, photos for the photo lovers and still updating during the Covid-19 pandemic. I think the only real faults with it are if you're into amateur action, scenes that make you believe the actresses are into it the lesbian sex, or if you want any kind of story or setup, you may be a little disappointed. The site does do an excellent job of capturing the action on camera (professional) and showcases the models' bodies.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Over 950 solo scenes of mostly attractive US and Euro girls pleasuring themselves.
Straightforward site design and navigation, with scenes listed as pages of thumbnails showing title, release date, pussy type and rating. Scenes can be filtered by multiple category tags of which there are many. Search function works well.
Site works well on mobile devices with previous and next scene links in scene detail page.
Scene detail page provide streaming, downloading and viewing photo slideshow, also model name, release date and scene duration. Can rate the scene, leave comments and add scene to favourites. Clicking model name brings up the her info page showing detailed info and her scenes.
Model gallery shows a list of paged thumbnails with alphabetic filtering, or can filter by pussy type. Can also select model name from dropdown list. Model thumbnails also feature pussy close-up.
Cons:
PROS (cont'd)
Videos can be downloaded as 1080p, 720p, 480p and 320p, photosets can be downloaded as ZIP files, either high or low quality.
Good download speeds with no download limits and downloaded videos are good quality with reasonable file size.
Membership discount via PU and other links found with google.
Easy signup and subscription cancellation via Vendo (but see cons).
CONS
Signup page a little confusing - the username and password fields are pre-filled with random username and password, but you can just delete those and choose your own, so long as each are at least six characters long.
Pre-checked cross-sells on sign-up page.
Links to pages are a bit slow - clicking a link results in 5 or so second pause before the page loads, but once loaded the page is responsive.
The filter tags are not alphabetically sorted, making location the tag you want more difficult.
Scene listing thumbnails don't indicate which scenes are favourites.
At 1600x1071, high quality photos aren't.
Bottom Line:
If you're a pussy worshipper then you'll love this site, though but I do think the Pussypedia feature is just a gimmick to distinguish it from other sites. Oddly the scene detail pages don'tmention the pussy classification at all.
It also includes access to other sites in the Puffy Network which is the parent site.
The site is easy to use and functional though I found the tagged categories to be sometimes inaccurate when using them to track down scenes I'd be interested in, so you're probably better off just browsing all the scenes and picking from that. Having said that, I'd rather have the option of selecting scenes by tag than not have.
The Pussypedia classifies a woman's pussy as either Puffy Peach, Big Taco or Juicy Cherry - the detailed descriptions for each are interesting enough but at the end of the day, I'm less focussed on the type of pussy and more focussed on the woman as a whole, hence my opinion that it's a marketing gimmick for the site - I'm sure others will disagree :)
About the scenes:
-scenes are solo, starting off with the girl stripping and playing with herself, using her fingers or a selection of toys. Some scenes feature no toys at all, just the girl using her fingers to stimulate her clit or finger her pussy or asshole.
-there are a few DP scenes in that the girl has something stuck in either hole whilst fingering or thrusting something else into the other hole.
-due to the selection of toys, there's plenty of variety in the all solo scenes, though I did spot at least one scene where the camera man's fingers make an appearance to finger or play with the girl's pussy.
The featured toys/tools range from large to small dildos, large and small suction devices (which for a Puffy Peach distends the pussy quite a bit), some speculum-type inserts that open up the pussy for an interesting look inside whilst at the same time stimulating the labia, to vibrators used to stimulate the clit or inside pussy and clit simultaneously.
-some toys are large and fill her pussy or ass, others are slender/shiny which tend to be used in the ass.
-some scenes feature "chunky" balls on a string that are inserted and swallowed up one-by-one by the pussy, then slowly pulled out using the tiny bit of string dangling outside. Some scenes feature an inflatable dildo.
-usually the scenes end with the girl cumming and sometimes pissing.
-scenes average about 20 minutes long, though some are over 30 minutes and some are as short as 10 minutes. For the lingerie lovers out there, quite a few scenes feature stockings and panty-hose which for me, nearly always adds to the hotness.
-scenes are well produced and good technical quality, with good camera angles and close-ups of the pussy action.
-some scenes feature pissing, which some folk will like but it's not really for me, but having said that, when a girl cums she'll often need to pee so I guess it's all part of the action in some cases.
The photosets are the weakest part of the site, with no proper high-quality/resolution photosets available and the so-called high quality option maxing out at 1600x1071 pixels. The low quality pics are 1000x666. Compared with other sites the photos aren't that well lit but as someone more interested in the scene videos, I'm not too bothered about the photos but I mention them here for those for whom photo quality is important.
The signup page offers a choice of full access (USD 9.95 for 30 days, recurring at USD 29.95), streaming only (USD 9.95 per month recurring) or a PAYG option where you purchase tokens used to buy individual scenes, which seems a crazy option given that the smallest number of tokens cost USD 19.95 - to be honest I didn't notice the latter options when signing up and just went with the default full access option for 9.95, which is great value.
Considering the content and price, I recommend this site overall, particularly as it includes the rest of the Puffy Network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Bills using CCBill and Segpay
Can search by name or type of scene
PU has a discount
If this was fast food it would be described as Super Sized. I see 950 videos and photosets.
Many steamy black, Latina and Asian models. Many nice looking white blonds too.
Nice variety of ages from young and barely legal to MILF.
Cons:
Most videos are nice HD, but many here are not. I think a lot of the oldest videos are remastered lower quality.
The tour does not have trailers.
The videos start on autoplay before you get to download.
Most videos use pornstars, not amateur models, unlike other sites on the network.
I like some story with my sex. Very few have any story.
Bottom Line:
This site has never been reviewed before here on Porn Users. As it has been around since 2003 and has 950 lesbian videos and photosets, I am rather surprised.
When I first checked this out I was not impressed by the tour. I could see the content is easy to search by model or other search terms, but could not learn much else. They apparently think we don’t need to see trailers for the videos. I think there are some, but if you click on one it takes you to the page where you sign up. It was one huge site and PU has a nice discount, so I took a chance.
The network features a lot of amateurs. This site has some, but for the most part the models are known American pornstars. Not bad, but not what I was hoping for. I wanted real chemistry. For me the site was hit and miss on the heat scale.
However it all depends on who is signing up for the site.
If you are a guy who likes your standard porn star lezzie experience, the site delivers big time. It has many slick well done lesbian scenes with pretty stars and the usual action, such as dildos and other toys, magic wands, scissoring and of course what they call here muff diving.
A funny thing though as nearly all of the models are shaved so there really is no muff to dive into.
I did very much like the variety of the models. There is a nice amount of different ages, body types, as well as many black, Latina and Asian models. They even have a hot scene starring Ana Foxxx.
Mostly the scenes are one on one, but there are also some threesomes and some orgy scenes. For me the best scenes were teen and MILF paired together.
For me this was probably an 80 to 85 site as it just has so many videos that some turned me on.
For guys I think you might rate this higher, maybe in the 90’s.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are running a current special of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
But the special one year price is $60, which is very low.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So ISP does not keep a record of each member page you visit
-No streaming or download limits that I can find.
-You get confirming emails on signup, with your login details, subscription id, order details (price and duration of membership), credit card used, etc.
-Most videos are available in 320p through 4K definition.
-Videos have a runtime of 20 to 30 minutes.
-Photosets are available in zip files in 2 definitions: low and high.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-User name and password are computer generated, so have to write them down. But they are in the confirming emails, so can copy and paste into login page.
-The site has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, but the thumbnails are usually poor photos of the models: a home photographer could easily take photos that would make the models more attractive.
You look at the thumbnails of the models, and realize that the girls in any mall would look much better than what these models look like. How you photograph a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears.
I look through the thumbnails of the models, and I find some models I'm familiar with, such as Delphine, who is a very attractive blonde model, and at this site (at least, in the thumbnail), she is not attractive. Nika O, another attractive model, looks poor.
If a site does not have attractive female models, I usually have little interest in the site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Even the models I know can be very attractive, at this site thumbnails, are not attractive.
-The online photoplayer is slow.
-The quality of the photos varies. From poor to OK.
-I've seen many screen caps at competing sites that were far better quality than the photos at this site: two problems with the photos at this site: the models are not made up to be attractive. The second problem is the quality of the photos: they are just poor photos. Even models that I've seen can be very attractive at other sites, at this site, they are not attractive. The colors of the photo are poor. The model looks poor. The photosets are a waste of time.
I look at the photos of Nika O, an attractive teen. I know it's her, because I've seen her at other sites. And I've seen her at other sites with the same name. But at this site, in the photos, she looks like poor. At MetArt, Nubiles, ShowyBeauty, she is an attractive young teen. Sexy. Erotic. An object of desire.
At Wet and Puffy, she is a piece of meat I would not look at twice.
Am I over-reacting? I don't think so.
Porn is fantasy.
But if the image of the model is so unappealing, the value of the porn is damaged.
There was a recent poll at PU that asked: "Do you feel high-quality photos are an important part of a site's content?"
Well, the photos at Wet and Puffy are not high-quality photos. They are low-quality photos, that degrade the value of the models, that degrade the value of the site.
Sites like X-Art, the Wow sites have good to excellent photosets, that display the attractiveness of their models.
The Teen Mega World network has improved the quality of their photos over the years, to the point where the photos can present attractive young teens and contribute to the quality of the network.
The photos at Wet and Puffy are poor photos, that degrade the value of the site.
Even when they do have models that are naturally attractive, those models are presented as un-attractive females.
Holly, another attractive model, has 1 video at Wet And Puffy. An attractive model, pretty face, voluptious body, but the video is hurt by the skin tones of the model. She's just not attractive.
At Wow Girls, where she's listed as Barbie, she looks great. At Wet And Puffy, because of the poor skin tones, she looks blah. Not pretty or attractive.
The lighting and other factors can add or detract from the value of a video, and at Wet And Puffy, the photos and videos are poor. Even when they take a pretty model, she will look poor or unattractive in her photos and videos at Wet And Puffy.
BOTTOM LINE(Start of):
Site theme: The site classifies a woman's pussy into one of three types:
puffy peach, juicy cherry or big taco.
So the site focuses on pussies and toys.
Whatever it takes to get a woman off.
(Except no men are allowed.)
So you get all kinds of masturbation with toys.
-You get access to 6 sites with a membership.
wetandpuffy
weliketosuck
wetandpissy
puffynetwork
simplyanal
eurobabefacials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Porn is fantasy.
One of the main factors I look at is how attractive the models are.
The models at Wet and Puffy are not presented attractively.
That is a major negative factor, for me, at least.
So, in spite of the current special price of $60 for one year, I would not join this site.
That is a personal judgment.
Other PU members have found the site to have value.
Homegirl gave the site a score of 90.
mbaya gave the site a score of 95.
tangub gave the site a score of 84.
It's a large site.
Over 900 videos.
Over 900 photo sets.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Comes with the five site Puffy Network.
Interesting pussy classification system.
Pretty big site, 953 videos, with lots to love about it.
Lots of great looking women
Special price on PU of only $14.95 for a month
I loved Lady Dee, what a woman.
Cons:
I saw mostly white women but this is ok. More variety is better.
Bottom Line:
Just the other day there was a poll that asked “How do you like your pussy?” I answered “wet and juicy”. This site is Wet and Puffy and it also answers the question. It is all about hot girls getting off by masturbating. It gives a new meaning to do it yourself.
It comes with Puffy Network, but the other four sites are not ones I cared about as they are focused on women and men having sex together.
One thing I found to be fun was that they have a great way to search by types of pussy.
These are the three pussy types they have on the site: big taco, juicy cherry and puffy peach. I have never heard of doing this and I think this is very creative and original. I have a pretty good idea of what each of these are. Within these you can do a detail search using hairy, pussy piercing, shaved and trimmed pussy. My first choice is hairy juicy cherry. Yummy.
The models get themselves off by using all kinds of dildos, pussy spreaders, toys inserted both vaginal and anal, anal beads and pussy pumps. The action includes lots of pussy close ups, panty play, and my favorite one, which is opening up those pussy lips and stretching them.
The orgasms look realistic and not fake, unlike many porn sites. This is very much 100% on the hot meter. I think they had a lot of fun making these scenes and I am glad they shared the fun with me and you.
The women are mostly white, and very thin. I loved Apolonia, a Latina from Spain with a Juicy Peach pussy, who had one scene and adored Chloe Lamour, three scenes, who also looks Latina and her pussy is Big Taco. My favorite though was Lady Dee who has a vaguely exotic and very special Asian look. I want to see a lot more of her in lesbian scenes. She has a high level of sexy enthusiasm that I can’t take my eyes off. She had only one scene with her Juicy Cherry pussy that I couldn’t take my eyes off.
The only black models I found were Luna Corazon and Luciana, but they don’t do anything for me.
The site is very friendly to use and anyone can find anything they want without much effort.
They have 953 videos as of today. That is enough to keep me busy for a lot longer than a month, but they are having a deal right now that is a bargain. For only $14.95 you can download all you want for thirty days.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I liked the preview as it lets you see what you will be paying for.
-Everybody here likes CCBill
-The site is very easy to use and find what you want.
-Lots to see on the site. It would take more than a month to check out completely
-Pussy, pussy, pussy, wide open and sometimes wet. When you get tired of pussy, let me know.
Cons:
-Almost only white girls. I like to see more than just them. I liked Cristina Miller a whole lot though.
-No other sites come with it.
Bottom Line:
I rather liked this site as it delivers what it promises ion the previews. If you like to see spread open pussy, this is a great site.
Some of the scenes are just spreading their pussies, but often they stretch those lips wide open and you can see everything. Sometimes they use a medical device and put a small camera inside so you can see every last detail. Sometimes it feels like you are in a doctor’s office and it is not so sexy. However, these girls seem to enjoy what they are doing, bringing out heir exhibitionist sides. How do I know that? In a lot of the scenes you can see them getting wet. This works for me.
Some scenes have two girls, but it is not a lesbian scene. They just spread each other. I would get so hot from doing this that I could not help myself. What a missed opportunity.
The site is pretty big and includes both videos and photosets. I counted about 1200 videos and almost as many photo sets. They offer 4K if you need that.
The site is easy to use and you can find everything, even sorting by pussy type. This was very original and there were some categories I never thought of like tongue for a pussy with an extra part inside that looks something like a tongue.
So how are the girls? Well they were pretty but a lot of them were not all that. I have seen better looking models on other sites. On the other hand, how many sites showcase pussies like this? The other fault is that the girls were almost only white. I know this is a European site, so I can’t be surprised about that.
I had to check out one that was not European and not even white, and she is Cristina Miller. It says she is from Ecuador and she has some nice, very sexy Latina color. She has three scenes here as well as three picture sets. These were just great. If anyone knows a site that has more of her, please let me know.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Quite possibly the most genuine porn in terms of performer enjoyment that I've ever come across.
Great diversity in body types of the performers - something for everyone.
Huge amount of content that can be streamed or downloaded. Archive of video clips totaling 5427 according to the site, dating back to 2006, and all around 5 to 15 minutes long, with HD option offered on videos since 2009.
Frequent updates - appears to be daily while I've been a member.
Community forum that's contributed to by staff from site, the performers, and members.
Cons:
Unable to search videos by niche.
Many of the performer's videos are released as a part 1 and 2. This doesn't take away from the quality of either part as a stand alone video, this site generally ensures at least 1 orgasm happens in each vid - but it looks like there's often a week long gap between both parts being released, even though they were both shot from the same performance.
Bottom Line:
This site makes a point of using genuine amateurs for the most part, and letting them masturbate however they want to capture how they best achieve self orgasm. The resulting content, in my opinion, is 2nd to none in both the female masturbation niche, and in terms of depicting women genuinely having a great time and getting off.
I found the lack of being able to search by niche a little disappointing. They do somewhat make up for this by having a 'List of Lists' section on their forum, where they encourage members and performers to make their own lists of videos with desired niches (i.e. body types, squirting, toys, etc.). I do appreciate why they've gone this route - likely taking the view that all performers add equal value to the site and their vids deserve to be enjoyed rather than categorized, but I personally would've liked the option.
None the less - it's difficult to be too critical of the most genuine porn I've come across. If you're after female masturbation videos, look no further!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the most realistic, most believable and most natural porn site on the internet.
- 5,408 scenes of mostly solo masturbation but also has lesbian and some male/female.
- I've been a member here off and on for over 10 years.
- Uses GMBill, a lesser known biller but I've never had any problems with them.
- Updates daily, sometimes twice.
- Women of nearly all shapes, size and looks.
- Navigation takes some getting used to but I've been a member enough that it's pretty easy to use and find what you're looking for.
- Scenes vary from closeups of the model's face to more explicit scenes that show everything.
- Defines the word erotic in the porn world better than any other site.
- Very high technical quality on videos, see bottom line.
- Categories that make it easy to find what you're looking for once you get used to the names of the categories.
- Very good download speeds (85% of my max)
Cons:
- It can be overwhelming. The model list is next to impossible to use to count the models.
- Will apply to any and everyone that joins it, there will be some models you won't find attractive.
Bottom Line:
A long time ago, I gave this site an 85. That was also when most of the content just focused on the model's face and showed very little nudity. I enjoyed some of those scenes but thought it was too soft which is unheard of from me. I even like non-nude "porn".
The scenes have become more explicit though nowhere near as explicit as most sites. There's a connection, for me, between the model and her willingness to be more explicit, to be more vocal and that's a selling point for me. It's women enjoying themselves naturally and most look very comfortable doing it. I don't even know if that's true. Maybe the ones that just show their face/expressions/moans just aren't in the mood to show more on that day.
I do lean towards and favor the ones that show more. Some of them will pull up porn on their laptop and masturbate while watching it. Which kind of makes me laugh a little since I think it shows us men are more impatient than women. You never see them fast forwarding. I also like the minimal production, the lighting, I have bad eyesight and it gets worse when looking at bright lights. The scenes are very good for those into voyeurism.
The numbers can be a little confusing. With 5,408 videos, I'm using their number on that, this is a very large site. They have 2,269 scenes listed as studio. 1,208 listed as fantasy and adventure. 898 listed as homemade. 411 as close-up. 377 as video diary. 157 as lucubrations and 88 as loose ends.
Most of those are self-explanatory. The loose ends ones are shorter, there's outdoor pissing, talking, and as shown by the number this is a very small part of the site. The video diary ones once fooled me into thinking they were interviews but they're not. All that I've watched are masturbation including some exhibitionism.
The video quality on the newest scenes tops out at 1080p, there's also a 540p version and a 270p version. The scenes are short enough that most of the 1080p versions are at or around 500MB each.
Graphic descriptions usually aren't needed for porn but one of my biggest fetishes is hard nipples. You can watch scenes here where you can see the models nipples getting harder. This content is now very appealing to me. My last review of it was during a period of my porn journey that favored and preferred hardcore content. Now, I can see, hear and enjoy this porn possibly the way it's supposed to be.
I didn't list this as a con only because I think it would detract from the scenes, there are no pictures. Most of these models look like they've got themselves ready to go and perform, so throwing in "how about we take 150 photos real quick" might break that momentum.
It's also one of the few sites that has bios for the models that seem real. They list their favorite books, movies and music. Depending on your own taste in those, you can pick up on one for example, saying she's an ABBA fan.
I do like the girl/girl scenes as these seem to be very believable, a major selling point in lesbian porn but really don't care for the male/female scenes.
I think it would be easy for some to miss the model search feature. I know it's right there but it is very in-depth. I use the nationality filter to look for models that fit a look I usually prefer like Brazil where I found Ana B who might be one of the most expressive and active models on the site. Even giving the view of her masturbating on her stomach. If you're patient with the model search you find out it's very useful. You can pick nationality, type of scene (solo, friends), even age range.
If you're going to complain about anything on it I would say the layout, having 513 pages of 10 scenes per page is overwhelming. Use the model search. They do list the model's name and if you click it you can see all of the model's scenes which at least lets you focus on the models you like best.
I don't think this is a site you can really take in over one month. I'm thinking it's going to take me 3 months to get everything I want.
It's a good example of why it's so hard to score a site a 100. There are just minor problems that stop it from being perfect. On a personal note, I would like to see a few more Asians. And looking for them showed another minor problem, the older, I would even say oldest scenes are 480p. I found that when I found a Japanese model from 2008.
Beyond those minor complaints this is a site that does erotic better than all the sites I see promoting themselves as erotic. I also want to mention I haven't hit any download limits but haven't download more than 10GB or so in any of my days as a member.
Great site, now if I can just get myself to cancel it after another month or two.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that's about women having very visible, messy orgasms. Call it the opposite of a cumshot site.
- Smaller site than I realized with only 58 scenes but this is a relatively rare niche and they are updating once per week.
- Mostly top-level models that even I know of like Maya Bijou, Autumn Falls and Kali Roses.
- Very high technical quality on the videos.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Segpay for billing.
- Believable orgasms.
- Scenes average 35-45 minutes
- Unlimited downloads and streaming.
Cons:
- Tough con to talk about the size of the site. It's a newer site and those into this type of content would probably download all the scenes. Quantity vs Quality debate rages on.
- It could use a promo considering the size of the site.
- They have other sites that you can add on as a whole for $69 more. They also include each model's scenes from their other sites in the model list. It makes that $69 offer look more enticing. That's a con to me.
Bottom Line:
There's very few things I like better in sex or porn than seeing a woman's pleasure. Sites like this are not that common. You almost get the feeling the guys are competing to see how many times they can make the female they're paired with have an orgasm. It's a nice change of pace from scenes being focused on making the man cum.
Autumn Falls scene on here is the best scene I've seen her in. This site makes you wonder how many of the female models are holding back in other hardcore scenes on other sites. There is a relatively high percentage of both males and females that find their partner's pleasure more important than their pleasure. We don't see that much in porn.
Most of the action is pretty standard. Male/female, no threesomes or group sex or lesbian scenes. The only unique part about the content is the focus on the woman having orgasm(s). There's a certain level of tease in the scenes ... from the male. Not stripping or anything like that but pulling out as the woman starts to orgasm then penetrating and speeding up. Some of the orgasms the women have are those world-ending, mind-blowing, whole body shaking orgasms.
The technical side of the site stands out.
The videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, the 720p option has two formats (mp4 and wmv) and 480p. That's on all 58 scenes.
The navigation could be better but since it's smaller site and all scenes are focused on the woman's orgasm it's not quite as important. There are no tags or search features. You just click scenes and they load up.
You do get some public content. Some of the scenes start with the model inserting a remote vibrator in herself and the male controlling it, could be by the pool, could be in a moving car.
You won't be shorted on orgasms. While Autumn Falls scene is my favorite of these, there are scenes with 7 orgasms, even 8 orgasms with other models. There are also squirting orgasms in some of the scenes. Notice my use of "some" that's because of the lack of tags. I would have to watch about 45 hours of these scenes to give exact numbers.
After joining, I realized adding the full package would have been a better option and deal but then again only a few of their other sites appeal to me. I've become a niche porn viewer. With the rare exceptions where there's a model I really like. I could watch Autumn Falls fall off a toilet and enjoy it.
I'm going above my average on the score since this niche is one I've always been interested in. It reminds me a little of the Japanese scenes where the men see how many times they can make the women orgasm. Add the very high quality of the videos and hopefully they'll keep adding new scenes every week. The pictures could be better quality, 1500 long end with zips and are the hybrid studio/screencap sets. This is where they film the model by herself to get 10 or so pictures/caps, usually fully clothed and going into tease, then the sets become screencaps from the video. Very good site for those into the niche, probably an average site to those not into the niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Beautiful Czech models spreading, gaping, fisting, and playing with toys, often with a big smile
+you can preview the whole site
+clean, well-designed website with no ads or upsells
+billing through CCBill a top tier reputable biller
+videos in four sizes (4K, 1080, 720, 540)
+picture sets in 2400, 1600, 1200 px
+updates six or seven days a week (see bottom line)
+model bios and very entertaining scene descriptions
+excellent tag system with searchable tags and filters
+excellent photography
+excellent community with comments, surveys, and ratings of models
+Site owners listen
+full downloads
Cons:
-mostly Czech models, so very little ethnic diversity
-repetitive sets
-no bonus or network sites
Bottom Line:
This is my second review of PJ Girls and I have to be honest--this is one of my favorite porn sites on the internet. It's small and has niche content, but it sticks to it's niche well, the content is excellent, it never misses updates, and the site owners listen to the members. I'm even more impressed with the site two years after my last review. So many sites drop off in quality over time, but PJ Girls hit it's stride early and has kept up bringing us fantastic Czech models showing every inch of their pussies.
The site itself is clean and well-organized, even if not flashy. It has no upsells and no ads, so there's nothing to distract from the content. There are multiple ways to filter content--by content type, model type, pussy type, model name, or by tag. This can be further sortable by date, downloads, comments, or rating. In all the content is easy to find, and easy to preview. You can preview the whole site without being a member, but downloads are for members only. It does mean you can check out all the content you want before joining--a rarity nowadays.
Technically the site downloads quickly (100% of my max speed). It has four sizes of video, including almost all but the oldest content in 4K. It has three sizes of picture files.
The site updates alternating videos and picture sets every day except Sunday (bonus content is released on Sundays). Bonus content is available to members after three continuous months of membership. The videos are generally about 15 minutes in length, and picture sets around 100 pictures.
The models are generally Czech, with a large majority of them young, thin, and pretty, though there are some MILF and mature models, and some "thick" models. But the vast majority are white. The models seem eager to spread for you, often with a big smile.
The site allows up votes and down votes, and a favorites option for each set. Comments are common, and the user base very avid and enthusiastic. The site owners are respectful, helpful, and listen to their users.
It's a great site. It's niche content, but it sticks to its niche and provides lots of great content. They've not dropped off a bit in two years, and I have to up my score from a 96 to a 98. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED if you like spreading, gaping, and some fisting.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very complete preview pages.
-Bills through CCBill, the very best and most reliable biller.
-Updates every other day for videos as well as for photo sets. Great for a niche site.
-Nice mix of ages and body sizes. Teens to MILFS, skinny to BBW.
-Most scenes are available as first rate 4K.
-Huge archive of more than 1100 videos and a photo set for every video.
-The scene descriptions are extremely complete and detailed.
-There is a quick download link that works well.
-The webmaster is very hands on and answers emails quickly
-Top quality bonus videos and photos for long term members after 3 months.
-Extensive tag system that is very interesting. See below.
-Nine language choices.
-No download limits
Cons:
-Not much ethnic diversity. Almost all models are thin, white and from the Czech Republic. This is to be expected from a European site.
-I would have preferred less toy use
-Standalone site with no extras, but the archive is so big you may not care.
Bottom Line:
There are some people that grow on you. The more you know them the more you like them. I am that way with this site.
This is my third review of this site. I still am amazed at how well done it is. The porn world is full of big megasites that produce tons of content and have a big staff. This is a small independent. They have managed to take a disadvantage and make it a plus. The customer service is second to none. They listen to the members and take advice well.
The site describes itself as the masters of gaping. It is an accurate description but the name tells you nothing about the content. Usually in porn gaping refers to anally, especially after a lot of ass play or anal sex.
Here the gaping is vaginal. What you get are videos and photosets of women gaping their vaginas, using fingers, devices such as speculums, dildos, and Magic Wands. Many of the models get visibly turned on by the scenes. In the archive of over 1100 scenes there are 254 tagged as juicy. You see wet vaginas, a result of explicit, erotic exhibitionism on film. I love this, the fact that they are turned on by making me hot.
The tag system is very effective. There are 42 helpful tags. The pussy ones are incredible. They have tags for shaved pussy 935 videos, trimmed 295, hairy 33, huge 398, tight 177, juicy 254, which is a wet pussy as they are turned on, and tongue 89. They describe tongue as being located at the very bottom of the vaginal opening (near the anus) and this pink part has the shape of a triangle or a tongue. It's probably a residue of the hymen. The shape of this 'tongue' differs from woman to woman and its appearance is rare, at about 10% of women, the site explains. They say even when it exists, its visibility depends on the pose, lighting, angle or width of gaping.
.
I was expecting the videos to suffer from being formulaic, but that is not really true. In some there are toys, but not all. In some there is some masturbation, but not all. In some there are two women. Sometimes both gape, but in some the model remains clothed, but gapes the other one.
My only complaint is very subjective as I would have preferred less or even no use of toys.
For the most part the models are first rate, well known prominent Eurostars. Some I recognized are Cindy Shine, Angel Wicky, Antonia Sainz, one of my all time favorites Satin Bloom, exotic superstar Lady Dee, Victoria Sweet, Paula Shy, Lexi Dona and Angel Piaff,
Jasmine Webb and Alisha Mae are black UK models and Cristina Miller Latina. Now if they only got Apolonia LaPiedra from Spain, I would give this site a 100. Just kidding as one model is not worth adding a few points.
Some videos and photo sets are available only to members after a three month or more membership. They are added once a month and are absolute top quality.
The preview tour is open and very complete. The member’s pages are easy to use and uncluttered. There is no advertising. The scene descriptions are very complete, detailed and are very comprehensible in English. No ridiculous and laughable machine translations.
Navigation is simple and I found no download limits or broken links or other problems. There is a choice of nine language options. I have never seen this many on another site. They are English, German, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Japanese, Polish and Czech.
I will pay this site a rare and high compliment. I will sign up for another year as it is worth it. I never do that. One month and on to the next one is my style.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
